Annual Meeting of the United Kingdom Belize Association Latin American Centre, University of Oxford 1 Church Walk, Oxford

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Meeting of the United Kingdom Belize Association Latin American Centre, University of Oxford 1 Church Walk, Oxford Annual Meeting of the United Kingdom Belize Association Latin American Centre, University of Oxford 1 Church Walk, Oxford Saturday 7th October, 2017 9.30 am to 5.30 pm 9.30 am - 10.00 am Welcome - David Howard, University of Oxford and Neil Stuart, UKBA President, University of Edinburgh 10.00 am - 11.00 am Belize in the British newspaper archives: 1722-1900 - Victor Bulmer-Thomas, University of London Canals and borders: economic diplomacy and the Belize territorial dispute - David Gomez, University College London Access to Belizean history - Cathy Smith, University of Edinburgh 11.15 am - 12.30 pm Belize UK relations - Perla Perdomo, High Commission for Belize, London A case of Belizean exceptionalism? Exploring multi-ethnicity and political parties in Belize - Dylan Vernon, Embassy of Belize-Belgium Energy for Life: community service and leadership - Claudia Garcia, University of Westminster and Manuela Lue, Energy for Life Programme 12.30 pm - 1.15 pm Lunch 1.15 pm - 2.45 pm Developing community business in Belize to improve local livelihoods in Toledo - Neil Stuart, University of Edinburgh, Duncan Macqueen, International Institute for Environment and Development, Elmar Requena and Nilcia Xi, Toledo Institute for Development and Environment and Cathy Smith, University of Edinburgh 1 Forest ecology and management in northwest Belize - Sheila Ward, Mahogany for the Future, Nicholas Brokaw, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras and Laura Snook, Bioversity International Negotiating science and resource management in rural communities - Sophie Haines, University of Oxford Maya archaeology and global soil security: recent research at Marco Gonzalez, Ambergris Caye, Belize - Elizabeth Graham, University College London 2.55 pm - 3.55 pm Screening and director’s discussion of the award-winning film Yochi (2016) - Ilana Lapid, New Mexico State University, Kristi Drexler, New Mexico State University and Lee Mcloughlin, Wildlife Conservation Society-Belize 4.00 pm - 4.30 pm Concluding comments and planning for UKBA 2018, the 21st annual meeting 4.30 pm - 5.30 pm Drinks’ reception 5.30 pm onwards The Royal Oak, 42-44 Woodstock Road, OX2 6HT 2 Presenters and presentation abstracts Belize in the British newspaper archives: 1722-1900 Victor Bulmer-Thomas Victor Bulmer-Thomas is an Associate Fellow in the US and the Americas Programme, Honorary Professor at the Institute of the Americas, University College London, and Emeritus Professor of Economics at London University. From 2001 to 2006, Victor was the director of Chatham House, and from 1992 to 1998 he was the director of the Institute of Latin American Studies at London University. He edited the Journal of Latin American Studies from 1986 to 1997, and has authored or edited more than 20 books on Latin America and the Caribbean including, The Economic History of Latin America since Independence (Third Edition, 2014) and The Economic History of the Caribbean since the Napoleonic Wars (2012). He is a non-executive director of the New India Investment Trust and the JP Morgan Brazil Investment Trust. He has received honours from the governments of Brazil, Colombia and the United Kingdom. Canals and borders: economic diplomacy and the Belize territorial dispute, 1845-1865 David Gomez The diplomacy towards the Belize-Guatemala territorial dispute has not been widely researched, although the matter of the dispute itself has been increasingly analysed over the years. In general, the assumption has been that Britain’s handling of the territorial claim to Belize was rooted in its desire for colonial expansion of territory, and subsequently study of the dispute hitherto has been focused largely on its colonial legacy – that is to say, the legal strength of the competing claims to Belize. Viewing Britain’s handling of the territorial dispute as power maximization however has clouded study of the subject, and also obscures the tangibility of Belize within Britain’s wider foreign policy towards the Central American region at a particular temporal juncture. This study rejects the above assumption and argues instead that British foreign policy behaviour towards the territorial dispute was influenced by its economic considerations in the region alongside other factors. Consequently, for more than a decade starting in the mid to late 1840s, settlement of the Belize territorial issue was subordinated to Britain’s wider interests in Central America. Yet most of the scholarship on the dispute seems to have glossed over this angle of analysis; or, alternatively, has treated it somewhat tangentially. This study addresses this deficit, and the aim is to elucidate the factors that may have shaped British foreign policy towards the Belize territorial dispute between 1845 and 1865; and also to explain how these likely combined to influence British foreign policy behaviour over the matter. Using a theory of bargaining leverage in territorial disputes that combines issue linkage and economic diplomacy as foreign policy strategies, this study submits that Britain’s diplomatic handling of the territorial dispute was influenced by an interplay of three things: the salience of Belize to Britain vis-à-vis plans for the construction of a trans-isthmian canal; changes in the nature of interstate power relations in the international system in the first half of the 19th century and the way in which Anglo-American relations had unfolded. This theory suggests that Britain benefitted from the challenge over the Belize territory by adopting a peaceful approach to managing the dispute and by linking an economic issue that was highly salient to other weighty factors in order to secure compromises with regards to Belize. In short, the way Britain handled the dispute allowed it to first exclude settlement of the Belize issue from the wider Central American issue; to subsequently obtain agreement from America on 3 the boundaries of Belize and finally to elude any contention from America on the grounds that it had contravened the Monroe Doctrine when it eventually declared Belize a colony. David Gomez is a trade and private sector development specialist with over twenty years of experience in international development projects. He has specialist expertise in international trade analysis and negotiations; export development; services trade; and value chain analysis. David has led or participated in a wide range of technical assistance and capacity building projects implemented by international development partners including the European Union, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the Commonwealth Secretariat, the Organization of American States and the World Bank. He has worked in Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean and the South Pacific. David is currently a doctoral research student at University College London - Institute of the Americas and holds a Graduate Diploma in International Development with Distinction from the London School of Economics; an MA in International Relations (with Distinction) from the University of Kent, Canterbury where he attended as a Chevening Scholar; a Master of Laws (LLM) in International Trade Law from Northumbria University in Newcastle and a BSc in Secondary Education from the University of Belize. Access to Belizean history Cathy Smith, University of Edinburgh In this talk I want to reflect a little on my experience of doing historical research about Belize using records located in the UK, in Belize, and online. I will examine the conditions that influence access to and interpretation of ‘the archive’ of Belizean history: the creators and form of the remaining records; level of physical preservation; ordering and cataloguing by archivists; movement and final location of the material. I will end by considering the implications for Belizeans who may be interested in researching their history. Cathy is entering the third year as a PhD student at the University of Edinburgh, which has run alongside working as the project officer for a DFID- funded Darwin Initiative Project that has been training communities in Toledo District in Belize in savanna fire management. Her research looks at how the history of fire management of the lowland coastal savannas of Belize has been shaped by the interaction of global scientific ideas with that specific ecological, social and political context. Belize UK relations Perla Perdomo Perla Perdomo is the High Commissioner for Belize in London. Perla is part diplomat (spending ten years as deputy head of mission in Mexico City, and setting up the Belize Embassy) and part businesswoman - she has spent the past six years in the private sector where, as the General Manager of Travellers Liquors Ltd, she oversaw the global expansion of the brand. A case of Belizean exceptionalism? Exploring multi-ethnicity and political parties in Belize Dylan Vernon Despite diverse multi-ethnicity, with two dominant ethnic groups, and some favourable pre- and post-independence conditions for divisive ethnic politics, the modern politics of Belize has 4 not been characterised by ethnic-based political parties. In light of the divergent experiences of such Commonwealth Caribbean states as Guyana and Trinidad & Tobago, my paper asks to what extent is the Belize case exceptional and why? I examine elements of the relationship between ethnicity and political parties, since adult suffrage in 1954 and into post-independence Belize, by exploring what factors in the Belize context contributed to the evolution and dominance of ethnically-integrated parties. I argue that the primary factor
Recommended publications
  • Caribbean Regional
    WORKING DOCUMENT SERIES CARIBBEAN REGIONAL GENERAL WORKING DOCUMENT 83 A SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE ON INCOME DISTRIDUTION AND THE FULFILLMENT OF BASIC HUMAN NEEDS IN THE CARIBBEAN REGION* *Antigua, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Is., Cayman Is., Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Kitts-Nevis- (Anguilla), St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Turks & Caicos Is. Clarence Zuvekas , Jr . Sector Analysis Internalization Group Office of International Cooperation and Development U.S. Department of Agriculture September 1978 i 3 Rural Development Division Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean Agency for International Development BESTAVAILABLE COPY WORKING DOCUMENT SERIES: CARIBBEAN REGION GENERAL WORKING DOCUMENT i\3 A SURVEY OF THE LITERATLTRE ON INCOME DISTRI13UTION AM> THE FULFILLMENT OF BASIC HUMAN NEEDS IN THE CARIBBEAN REGION* *Antigua, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Is. , Cayman Is., Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Kitts-Nevis- (Anguilla), St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Turks & Caicos Is. Clarence Zuvekas , Jr . Sector Analysis Internalization Group Office of International Cooperation and Development U.S. Department of Agriculture September 1978 i I This document does not bear the approval (nor imply such) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the United States Agency i for lnternationai Development, or any of j tneir offices. In view of its nacure as I G workiag paper, it should not be quoted I w!~hoci?erm;ssion of the originating O.:; -CZ. ,I; Any coinments wo"id be appreci- : L:2~, 6.;~can De addressed to the author , 6c: I 4112 ndditors Buiiding I I 14x1 & Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20250 BEST AVA MBLE COPY PREFACE Most of the data discussed in this survey were reviewed in an earlier document (Zuvekas 1978b) which presented a "profile" of small farmers in the Caribbean Region *I but was not intended to provide much interpretation or analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Workshops in Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Dominica, Grenada and Belize
    Report of the workshops in Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Dominica, Grenada and Belize. Possible use cases, people met and follow‐up ideas September 2014 Authors: Cees J. Van Westen, Victor Jetten, Mark Brussel, Faculty ITC, University of Twente Tarick Hosein and Charisse Griffith‐Charles, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago. Jeanna Hyde (Envirosense) Mark Trigg (University of Bristol) Report of the workshops in 5 target countries Page | 2 Report of the workshops in 5 target countries Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Invitation letter ....................................................................................................................... 7 2. Saint Lucia ..................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Participants of the workshop in Saint Lucia ........................................................................ 10 2.2 Map of Saint Lucia with indication of places visited during the fieldwork ........................ 15 2.3 Points visited during the fieldtrip / possible use cases ....................................................... 16 2.4 Follow‐up activities in Saint Lucia ........................................................................................ 19 3. Saint Vincent ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Border Restrictions Updated 6 April 2021
    Please note, although we endeavour to provide you with the most up to date information derived from various third parties an d sources, we cannot be held accountable for any inaccuracies or changes to this information. Inclusion of company information in this matrix does no t imply any business relationship between the supplier and WFP / Logistics Cluster, and is used solely as a determinant of services, and capacities. Logistics Cluster /WFP maintain complete impartiality and are not in a position to endorse, comment on any company's suitability as a reputable serv ice provider. If you have any updates to share, please email them to: [email protected] Border Restrictions Updated 6 April 2021 State / Territory Restrictions (Other Info) Restriction Period Source of Info URL / Remarks State of Emergency is extended until 18 April 2021. Color-coded system to guide response. Current level is Code Blue. All entry permits suspended until further notice. All travellers must provide negative COVID-19 test results within 72 hours before arrival and are subject to full quarantine of 14 days. Moreover, the American Samoa traveller is required to disclose if he/she had a positive result prior to testing negative. American Samoa Until 18 April 2021 Government, 19 March https://www.americansamoa.gov/ Cargo flights into the Territory to deliver or retrieve cargo or mail will be allowed, provided that each 2021 occupant of the plane must furnish proof to the Director of Health of a negative COVID-19 test results within 72 hours before arrival, and further provided tht no one will disembark withouth the prior written approval of the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize British Overseas Territories (Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Isla
    UNHCR staff monitoring programmes attheLoveAChild field hospital in Fond Parisien, Haiti. Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize British overseas territories (Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Montserrat) Canada Dominica Dominican Republic Dutch overseas territories in the Caribbean (Aruba, Curaçao, Saint Maarten, Bonaire, Saint Eustatius, Saba) French overseas departments (Martinique, Guadeloupe) Grenada Guyana Haiti Jamaica St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent and the Grenadines Suriname Trinidad and Tobago United States of America 348 UNHCR Global Report 2010 and the OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS l UNHCR continued to seek the political and financial l More than 80 per cent of UNHCR’s global resettlement support of the Governments of the United States and referrals are to the United States and Canada. Canada in order to fulfil its protection mandate and find comprehensive solutions for refugees. Working environment l In the United States, UNHCR sought to ensure that the country’s laws and policies, as well as their implementation, In the United States, the Government has confirmed its were in accordance with its obligations under the 1967 commitment to international obligations, particularly with Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. Specifically, regard to the parole of asylum-seekers. However, UNHCR promoted reforms to the way in which the refugee adjudications by the immigration courts and administrative definition is being applied under US law and monitored the and federal
    [Show full text]
  • Belize 2020 Human Rights Report
    BELIZE 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Belize is a constitutional parliamentary democracy. In the most recent national election, held on November 11, the People’s United Party won 26 of 31 seats in the National Assembly. Party leader John Briceno was sworn in as prime minister on November 12. The Ministry of National Security is responsible for oversight of police, prisons, the coast guard, and the military. The Belize Police Department is primarily responsible for internal security. The small military force primarily focuses on external security but also provides limited domestic security support to civilian authorities and has limited powers of arrest that are executed by the Belize Defence Force for land and shoreline areas and by the Coast Guard for coastal and maritime areas. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Members of security forces committed few abuses. Significant human rights issues included: allegations of the use of excessive force and inhuman treatment by security officers, allegations of widespread corruption and impunity by government officials, trafficking in persons, and child labor. In some cases the government took steps to prosecute public officials who committed abuses, both administratively and through the courts, but there were few successful prosecutions. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings There was a report that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. A team from the branch of the security force responsible for a killing or other abuse investigates the allegation and then presents the findings, recommendations, and penalties to authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Title Transforming Finance to Unlock Climate Action in the Caribbean
    TRANSFORMING FINANCE TO UNLOCK CLIMATE ACTION IN THE Application Title CARIBBEAN Country/ Region Belize, Jamaica, St Lucia Accredited Entity Caribbean Development Bank Approval Date 20/09/2020 GREEN CLIMATE FUND | PAGE 0 OF 2 Request for Support from the Project Preparation Facility (PPF) Application Title Transforming Finance to Unlock Climate Action in the Caribbean Country(ies) Belize, Jamaica, St Lucia Accredited Entity Caribbean Development Bank Date of first submission/ June 8, 2020 V.1 Version number Date of current submission/ August 27, 2020 V.2 version number Please submit the completed form to [email protected], using the following naming convention in the subject line and the file name: “PPF-[Accredited Entity]- [Country]-yyyymmdd” 2017 Project Preparation Facility GREEN CLIMATE FUND | PAGE 1 OF 9 Version 2.0 Notes • The PPF supports the development of projects and programmes and enhance their quality at entry into the Fund’s pipeline. With a view to enhancing the balance and diversity of the project pipeline, the PPF is designed to especially support Direct Access Entities for projects in the micro-to-small size category. International Accredited Entities seeking project preparation support from the PPF are encouraged to do so especially for LDCs, SIDS and African countries where no Direct Access Entity is accredited. All Accredited Entities are encouraged to articulate counterpart support for project preparation within their requests for support from the PPF. • A PPF submission should include below documents: 1. PPF request (this form) 2. PPF No-Objection letter1 3. Concept Note • Please copy the National Designated Authority (ies) when submitting this PPF request.
    [Show full text]
  • With CCCCC for Belize, Dominica, Haiti, Jamaica, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Greandines 15 December 2018 | Entity Support
    with CCCCC for Belize, Dominica, Haiti, Jamaica, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Greandines 15 December 2018 | Entity Support READINESS AND PREPARATORY SUPPORT PROPOSAL TEMPLATE PAGE 1 OF 39 | Ver. 15 June 2017 Readiness and Preparatory Support Proposal How to complete this document? - A Readiness Guidebook is available to provide information on how to access funding under the GCF Readiness and Preparatory Support programme. It should be consulted to assist in the completion of this proposal template. - This document should be completed by National Designated Authorities (NDAs) or focal points with support from their delivery partners where relevant. - Please be concise. If you need to include any additional information, please attach it to the proposal. - Information on the indicative list of activities eligible for readiness and preparatory support and the process for the submission, review and approval of this proposal can be found on pages 11-13 of the guidebook. - For the final version submitted to GCF Secretariat, please delete all instructions indicated in italics in this template and provide information in regular text (not italics). Where to get support? - If you are not sure how to complete this document, or require support, please send an e-mail to [email protected]. We will aim to get back to you within 48 hours. - You can also complete as much of this document as you can and then send it to [email protected]. We will get back to you within 5 working days to discuss your submission and the way forward. Note: Environmental and Social Safeguards and Gender Throughout this document, when answering questions and providing details, please make sure to pay special attention to environmental, social and gender issues, particularly to the situation of vulnerable populations, including women and men.
    [Show full text]
  • Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Isla
    Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize British overseas territories (Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Montserrat) Canada Dominica Dominican Republic Dutch overseas territories in the Caribbean (Aruba, Curaçao, Saint Maarten, Bonaire, Saint Eustatius, Saba) French overseas departments (Martinique, Guadeloupe, Saint-Barthélemy, Saint-Martin) Grenada Guyana Haiti Jamaica St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent and the Grenadines Suriname Trinidad and Tobago Iraqi refugee who found work United States of America at the Hilton Hotel. UNHCR / T. IRWIN 264 UNHCR Global Appeal 2012-2013 North and America the Caribbean Canada and the United States of America continue to receive a expanding the authorities’ powers of detention, which could also large number of asylum-seekers. These two countries are also apply to people of concern to UNHCR. home to the largest number of resettled refugees in the world. There are fears that the global economic downturn will lead National security concerns remain the driving force behind to reduced assistance for refugee programmes both nationally policy decisions affecting people of concern to UNHCR in the and internationally. In the United States, where budget region. In Canada, legislation being proposed in response to a reduction issues are the focus of the political debate, it is not clear growing number of asylum-seekers arriving by sea, to prevent how the climate of austerity might affect refugee-assistance human smuggling and abuse of the asylum system may also programmes. High unemployment rates are also affecting people impact negatively on people who are in need of international of concern to UNHCR.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Review Report of Belize
    Country Review Report of Belize Review by Haiti and Tuvalu of the implementation by Belize of articles 15 - 42 of Chapter III. “Criminalization and law enforcement” and articles 44 - 50 of Chapter IV. “International cooperation” of the United Nations Convention against Corruption for the review cycle 2010 - 2015 I. Introduction 1. The Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption was established pursuant to article 63 of the Convention to, inter alia, promote and review the implementation of the Convention. 2. In accordance with article 63, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the Conference established at its third session, held in Doha from 9 to 13 November 2009, the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the Convention. The Mechanism was established also pursuant to article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention, which states that States parties shall carry out their obligations under the Convention in a manner consistent with the principles of sovereign equality and territorial integrity of States and of non-intervention in the domestic affairs of other States. 3. The Review Mechanism is an intergovernmental process whose overall goal is to assist States parties in implementing the Convention. 4. The review process is based on the terms of reference of the Review Mechanism. II. Process 5. The following review of the implementation by Belize of the Convention is based on the completed response to the comprehensive self-assessment checklist received from Belize, and any supplementary information provided in accordance with paragraph 27 of the terms of reference of the Review Mechanism and the outcome of the constructive dialogue between the governmental experts from Haiti, Tuvalu and Belize, by means of by means of email exchanges and during the country visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Antigua Australia Bahamas Barbados Bermuda Belize Canada (Except
    ENGLISH PROFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS BY COUNTRIES Proof of English Proficiency IS NOT REQUIRED of applicants from the following countries: Antigua Belize Grenada Irish Northern Ireland Tobago Australia Canada (Except the Republic Scotland Wales Bahamas province of Quebec) Jamaica St. Kitts Zimbabwe Barbados Cayman Islands Nevis St. Vincent Bermuda Great Britain New Zealand Trinidad Proof of English Proficiency IS REQUIRED of applicants from the following countries: Afghanistan Costa Rica Iraq Morocco Slovenia Albania Cote d'Ivoire Israel Mozambique Solomon Islands Algeria Croatia Italy Myanmar, {Burma} Somalia Andorra Cuba Ivory Coast Namibia South Africa Angola Curacao Japan Nauru South Sudan Argentina Cyprus Jordan Nepal Spain Armenia Czech Republic Kazakhstan Netherlands Sri Lanka Aruba Denmark Kenya Nicaragua Sudan Austria Djibouti Kiribati Niger Suriname Azerbaijan Dominica Korea, North Nigeria Swaziland Bahamas Dominican Republic Korea, South Norway Sweden Bahrain East Timor Kosovo Oman Switzerland Bangladesh Ecuador Kuwait Pakistan Syria Belarus Egypt Kyrgyzstan Palau Tonga Belgium El Salvador Laos Panama Taiwan Benin Equatorial Guinea Latvia Papua New Guinea Tajikistan Bhutan Eritrea Lebanon Paraguay Tanzania Bolivia Estonia Lesotho Peru Thailand Bosnia & Ethiopia Liberia Philippines Togo Herzegovina Fiji Libya Poland Tonga Botswana Finland Liechtenstein Portugal Tunisia Brazil France Lithuania Puerto Rico Turkey Brunei Gabon Luxembourg Qatar Turkmenistan Bulgaria Gambia Macedonia Romania Tuvalu Burkina Faso Georgia Madagascar Russia
    [Show full text]
  • With CARICOM Development Fund for Belize and Saint Lucia 04 October 2019 | Strategic Frameworks
    with CARICOM Development Fund for Belize and Saint Lucia 04 October 2019 | Strategic Frameworks Programme title: Readiness to support the development of a Credit Risk Abatement Facility (CRAF) for CARICOM States Country: Regional Institution National designated authority: Belize, Saint Lucia Implementing Institution: CARICOM Development Fund Date of first submission: June 06, 2019. Date of current submission / version number: V1.3 Readiness and Preparatory Support Page 2 of 19 How to complete this document? - Please visit the Empowering Countries page of the GCF website to download the Readiness Guidebook and learn how to access funding under the GCF Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme. - This document should be completed by National Designated Authorities (NDA) or focal points with support from their Delivery Partners where relevant. Once completed, this document should be submitted to the GCF by the NDA or focal point to [email protected]. - Please be concise. If you need to include any additional information, please attach it to the proposal. - If the Delivery Partner implementing the Readiness support is not a GCF Accredited Entity for project Funding Proposals, please complete the Financial Management Capacity Assessment (FMCA) questionnaire and submit it prior to or with this Readiness proposal. The FMCA is available for download at the Library page of the GCF website. Where to get support? - If you are not sure how to complete this document, or require support, please send an e-mail to [email protected]. - You can also complete as much of this document as you can and then send it to [email protected], copying both the Readiness Delivery Partner and the relevant GCF Country Dialogue Specialist and Regional Advisor.
    [Show full text]
  • Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Isla
    Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize British overseas territories (Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Montserrat) Canada Dominica Dominican Republic French overseas departments (Martinique, Guadeloupe, Saint-Barthelemy, Saint-Martin) Grenada Guyana Haiti Jamaica St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent and the Grenadines Suriname Trinidad and Tobago United States of America A Karenni refugee resettled from Thailand now studying in Toronto, Canada. UNHCR/N.CHAMPASSAK 2 UNHCR Global Appeal 2010–11 and the Working environment Canada and the United States of America receive a large number of asylum-seekers. Both have complex but well-established asylum processes and their acceptance rates are among the highest of any industrialized countries. They also receive the highest numbers of resettled refugees in the world. The Government of the United States has recently agreed to review a number of policies affecting the ability of refugees to seek protection in the country. For example, it is examining its application of terrorism-related barriers to asylum, which have unintended consequences on asylum-seekers and refugees seeking permanent legal status or those in need of resettlement. The United States is also comprehensively reviewing its immigration detention system, and considering procedures for providing protection to stateless people who are in the country without legal status. UNHCR’s regional office in Washington D.C. covers 15 independent countries and 12 overseas territories or departments, principally in the Caribbean. The region is characterized by mixed migratory movements. Nine of the 12 independent Caribbean States have acceded to the 1951 Refugee Convention and/orthe 1967 Protocol, but only the Dominican Republic has passed implementing legislation.
    [Show full text]