DOCSLIB.ORG

Detecting Gravitational Scattering of Interstellar Objects Using Pulsar Timing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Detecting Gravitational Scattering of Interstellar Objects Using Pulsar Timing Draft version January 1, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Detecting gravitational scattering of interstellar objects using pulsar timing Ross J. Jennings,1 James M. Cordes,1, 2 and Shami Chatterjee1, 2 1Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 2Cornell Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA ABSTRACT Gravitational scattering events, in which the path of an interstellar object is deflected by a pulsar or the solar system, give rise to reflex motion which can potentially be detected using pulsar timing. We determine the form of the timing signal expected from a gravitational scattering event, which is ramp-like and resembles the signal produced by a glitch or a gravitational wave burst with memory (BWM), and investigate the prospects for detecting such a signal using a pulsar timing array. The level of timing precision currently achieved for some millisecond pulsars makes it possible to detect −10 objects as small as 10 M , less than the mass of the dwarf planet Ceres, at impact parameters as large as 1 au. The signals produced by gravitational scattering could provide independent constraints on models of dark matter involving asteroid-mass objects or subhalos, and should be considered as potential false positives in searches for BWMs. 1. INTRODUCTION planets (Charnoz & Morbidelli 2003). Some such bodies If a compact astrophysical object were to pass near have even been directly observed: In particular, the as- enough to a pulsar or to the solar system to interact teroid 1I/`Oumuamua (Meech et al. 2017) and the comet gravitationally, it would slightly alter the motion of the 2I/Borisov (Guzik et al. 2019) have both been identified pulsar relative to the solar system barycenter, poten- as interstellar in origin. To produce a detectable timing tially producing a detectable effect on the pulse times signal, an asteroid-like ISO would have to be a few hun- of arrival (TOAs). The North American Nanohertz Ob- dred kilometers in diameter and pass within a few au of servatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav; Arzou- a pulsar. This is significantly larger than either `Oumua- manian et al. 2018a) and other pulsar timing arrays mua or Borisov, but smaller than the largest objects in (PTAs; Desvignes et al. 2016; Hobbs 2013) have col- the asteroid belt. lected hundreds of pulsar-years of high-precision (sub- Some theories of dark matter predict that at least microsecond) pulsar timing data as part of their ef- a fraction of it is composed of massive ISOs, such as forts to detect gravitational waves. The various regional primordial black holes (PBHs) or subhalos. As a re- PTAs collaborate to form the international pulsar tim- sult, several searches for ISOs have been carried out ing array (IPTA; Hobbs et al. 2010), which occasion- with the goal of understanding the nature of dark mat- ally releases combined data sets (e.g. Verbiest et al. ter. For the most part, these have involved microlensing 2016; Perera et al. 2019). The qualities of PTAs that surveys, which are sensitive to any object with mass make them well suited for detecting gravitational waves along the line of sight to a star. The pioneering MA- { namely, the precision of arrival time measurements and CHO (Alcock et al. 2001), EROS (Tisserand et al. 2007), the long spans of time over which they may be collected and OGLE (Wyrzykowski et al. 2011) surveys largely { also make them highly sensitive to perturbations of ruled out the possibility that the majority of dark mat- −8 arXiv:1910.08608v2 [astro-ph.HE] 27 Dec 2019 this type. ter could consist of objects between 10 and 100 M , An interstellar object (ISO) gives rise to a gravita- but did not significantly constrain objects smaller than −8 tional scattering signal in pulsar timing data if it passes 10 M (approximately 20 times the mass of Ceres). close enough to a pulsar or to the solar system. One im- Subsequently, attention has focused on primordial black −11 −8 portant category of ISOs consists of free-floating planets holes with masses between 10 and 10 M as dark and smaller asteroid- and comet-like bodies. Almost cer- matter candidates (Carr et al. 2016). The strongest lim- tainly, a large number of these bodies exist in interstellar its on PBHs and other relatively compact objects in this space, since the planet formation process is thought to mass range come from a recent microlensing survey of result in the ejection of large numbers of rocky bod- the Andromeda galaxy using the Hyper Suprime Cam ies, ranging in size from planetesimals to fully-formed (HSC) on the 8.2-meter Subaru telescope (Niikura et al. 2 2019). The implications of these constraints for the ex- shapes with the template pulse shape using a Fourier- pected event rate are discussed further in Section6. domain matched filtering algorithm (Taylor 1992). Gen- A PBH or similar dark matter constituent would in- erally, averages with N 1 pulses are used, with typical teract with a pulsar in a manner indistinguishable from values of N being between 105 and 106. a baryonic ISO of equal mass. If they constituted a sig- The minimum uncertainty in estimating an arrival nificant fraction of dark matter by mass, PBHs would time comes from noise in the pulse profile measurement also be much more numerous than baryonic ISOs of the introduced by the receiver (radiometer noise). Comput- same mass. Because of this, pulsar timing has been pro- ing TOAs using a matched filtering algorithm minimizes posed as a means of detecting PBHs. Some proposals this contribution to the arrival time error for a given have focused on the Shapiro delay signal caused by ob- level of radiometer noise. In the absence of other sources jects along the line of sight to the pulsar (Siegel et al. of error, the uncertainty in arrival times computed using 2007; Clark et al. 2016), but others (Seto & Cooray 2007; matched filtering is given by (Cordes 2013; Lam et al. Kashiyama & Seto 2012; Kashiyama & Oguri 2018; Dror 2016): p et al. 2019) have discussed the Doppler signal, which is PWeff σMF = p : (1) more closely related to the timing signal described here. S Nφ Detectable encounters with ISOs are likely to be rare, Here P is the pulse period, S is the signal-to-noise ratio but examining a large volume of data makes their ob- (SNR), Nφ is the number of samples in pulse phase, and servation more likely. In this respect, it is important Weff is an effective pulse width, given by to distinguish between encounters with a pulsar and en- Z P −1 counters with the solar system. By analogy with the 0 2 Weff = U (t) dt ; (2) terminology used for gravitational wave signals, we call 0 the former \pulsar-term" scattering events and the lat- where U (t) is the pulse shape (normalized to unit max- ter \Earth-term" events. If many pulsars are observed, imum). the two scenarios give complementary sensitivities | In practice, TOA errors are larger than equation (1) since Earth-term events affect all pulsars, it is possible would predict, because other effects contribute. These to detect weaker events by cross-correlating the signals, include pulse jitter from the motion of emission regions but objects are more likely to pass near one of the pul- in pulsar magnetospheres; dispersion and scintillation, sars in a PTA simply because there are more pulsars. caused by propagation of the signal through the ionized This means that Earth-term events are more detectable interstellar medium; and spin noise, caused by interac- for large populations of very small objects, but pulsar- tions between the neutron star crust and its magneto- term events are more detectable for small populations sphere and superfluid interior. Of these, pulse jitter is of larger objects. uncorrelated in time, but scintillation, dispersion mea- In what follows, we calculate the shape of the timing sure variations, and spin noise are generally correlated, signal expected from a gravitational scattering event in producing gradual but random drifts in pulse times of ar- detail, and use the results to assess the circumstances rival. Spin noise has a \red" power spectrum with most under which such events may be detectable. In Sec- of the power concentrated at low frequencies. By con- tion2, we discuss the factors which limit the precision trast, radiometer and jitter noise have a \white" power of pulsar timing measurements. In Section3, we derive spectrum, contributing approximately equal power at all the expected timing signal. In Section4, we discuss the frequencies. conditions under which pulsar-term events may be de- Broadly speaking, pulsars can be divided into two cat- tected. Section5 describes the corresponding conditions egories: canonical pulsars (CPs), which are relatively for Earth-term events. In Section6, we review methods young and tend to have periods of order one second of estimating the number density of potential perturbers and surface magnetic fields of order 1012 gauss; and mil- in the galaxy, and speculate as to the frequency of de- lisecond pulsars (MSPs), which are much older and are tectable events. Finally, in Section7, we summarize our thought to have been spun up by accreting matter from results and draw conclusions. a companion. MSPs have significantly shorter periods (a few milliseconds) and weaker magnetic fields (of order 2. PULSAR TIMING PRECISION 108 gauss) than canonical pulsars. Additionally, MSPs Contemporary pulsar timing methods rely on the fact spin down much more slowly and have lower levels of that every pulsar has a characteristic average pulse spin noise (by a factor of around 106) than CPs (Shan- shape which is stable on time scales of decades.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix a Orbits
    Appendix A Orbits As discussed in the Introduction, a good ¯rst approximation for satellite motion is obtained by assuming the spacecraft is a point mass or spherical body moving in the gravitational ¯eld of a spherical planet. This leads to the classical two-body problem. Since we use the term body to refer to a spacecraft of ¯nite size (as in rigid body), it may be more appropriate to call this the two-particle problem, but I will use the term two-body problem in its classical sense. The basic elements of orbital dynamics are captured in Kepler's three laws which he published in the 17th century. His laws were for the orbital motion of the planets about the Sun, but are also applicable to the motion of satellites about planets. The three laws are: 1. The orbit of each planet is an ellipse with the Sun at one focus. 2. The line joining the planet to the Sun sweeps out equal areas in equal times. 3. The square of the period of a planet is proportional to the cube of its mean distance to the sun. The ¯rst law applies to most spacecraft, but it is also possible for spacecraft to travel in parabolic and hyperbolic orbits, in which case the period is in¯nite and the 3rd law does not apply. However, the 2nd law applies to all two-body motion. Newton's 2nd law and his law of universal gravitation provide the tools for generalizing Kepler's laws to non-elliptical orbits, as well as for proving Kepler's laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrodynamics
    Politecnico di Torino SEEDS SpacE Exploration and Development Systems Astrodynamics II Edition 2006 - 07 - Ver. 2.0.1 Author: Guido Colasurdo Dipartimento di Energetica Teacher: Giulio Avanzini Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aeronautica e Spaziale e-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Two–Body Orbital Mechanics 1 1.1 BirthofAstrodynamics: Kepler’sLaws. ......... 1 1.2 Newton’sLawsofMotion ............................ ... 2 1.3 Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation . ......... 3 1.4 The n–BodyProblem ................................. 4 1.5 Equation of Motion in the Two-Body Problem . ....... 5 1.6 PotentialEnergy ................................. ... 6 1.7 ConstantsoftheMotion . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 7 1.8 TrajectoryEquation .............................. .... 8 1.9 ConicSections ................................... 8 1.10 Relating Energy and Semi-major Axis . ........ 9 2 Two-Dimensional Analysis of Motion 11 2.1 ReferenceFrames................................. 11 2.2 Velocity and acceleration components . ......... 12 2.3 First-Order Scalar Equations of Motion . ......... 12 2.4 PerifocalReferenceFrame . ...... 13 2.5 FlightPathAngle ................................. 14 2.6 EllipticalOrbits................................ ..... 15 2.6.1 Geometry of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 15 2.6.2 Period of an Elliptical Orbit . ..... 16 2.7 Time–of–Flight on the Elliptical Orbit . .......... 16 2.8 Extensiontohyperbolaandparabola. ........ 18 2.9 Circular and Escape Velocity, Hyperbolic Excess Speed . .............. 18 2.10 CosmicVelocities
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Propulsion System Scaling for Asteroid Capture-And-Return Missions
    Electric propulsion system scaling for asteroid capture-and-return missions Justin M. Little⇤ and Edgar Y. Choueiri† Electric Propulsion and Plasma Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544 The requirements for an electric propulsion system needed to maximize the return mass of asteroid capture-and-return (ACR) missions are investigated in detail. An analytical model is presented for the mission time and mass balance of an ACR mission based on the propellant requirements of each mission phase. Edelbaum’s approximation is used for the Earth-escape phase. The asteroid rendezvous and return phases of the mission are modeled as a low-thrust optimal control problem with a lunar assist. The numerical solution to this problem is used to derive scaling laws for the propellant requirements based on the maneuver time, asteroid orbit, and propulsion system parameters. Constraining the rendezvous and return phases by the synodic period of the target asteroid, a semi- empirical equation is obtained for the optimum specific impulse and power supply. It was found analytically that the optimum power supply is one such that the mass of the propulsion system and power supply are approximately equal to the total mass of propellant used during the entire mission. Finally, it is shown that ACR missions, in general, are optimized using propulsion systems capable of processing 100 kW – 1 MW of power with specific impulses in the range 5,000 – 10,000 s, and have the potential to return asteroids on the order of 103 104 tons. − Nomenclature
    [Show full text]
  • Elliptical Orbits
    1 Ellipse-geometry 1.1 Parameterization • Functional characterization:(a: semi major axis, b ≤ a: semi minor axis) x2 y 2 b p + = 1 ⇐⇒ y(x) = · ± a2 − x2 (1) a b a • Parameterization in cartesian coordinates, which follows directly from Eq. (1): x a · cos t = with 0 ≤ t < 2π (2) y b · sin t – The origin (0, 0) is the center of the ellipse and the auxilliary circle with radius a. √ – The focal points are located at (±a · e, 0) with the eccentricity e = a2 − b2/a. • Parameterization in polar coordinates:(p: parameter, 0 ≤ < 1: eccentricity) p r(ϕ) = (3) 1 + e cos ϕ – The origin (0, 0) is the right focal point of the ellipse. – The major axis is given by 2a = r(0) − r(π), thus a = p/(1 − e2), the center is therefore at − pe/(1 − e2), 0. – ϕ = 0 corresponds to the periapsis (the point closest to the focal point; which is also called perigee/perihelion/periastron in case of an orbit around the Earth/sun/star). The relation between t and ϕ of the parameterizations in Eqs. (2) and (3) is the following: t r1 − e ϕ tan = · tan (4) 2 1 + e 2 1.2 Area of an elliptic sector As an ellipse is a circle with radius a scaled by a factor b/a in y-direction (Eq. 1), the area of an elliptic sector PFS (Fig. ??) is just this fraction of the area PFQ in the auxiliary circle. b t 2 1 APFS = · · πa − · ae · a sin t a 2π 2 (5) 1 = (t − e sin t) · a b 2 The area of the full ellipse (t = 2π) is then, of course, Aellipse = π a b (6) Figure 1: Ellipse and auxilliary circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Body Trajectory Design Strategies Based on Periapsis Poincaré Maps
    MULTI-BODY TRAJECTORY DESIGN STRATEGIES BASED ON PERIAPSIS POINCARÉ MAPS A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Diane Elizabeth Craig Davis In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2011 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii To my husband and children iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Kathleen Howell, for her support and guidance. She has been an invaluable source of knowledge and ideas throughout my studies at Purdue, and I have truly enjoyed our collaborations. She is an inspiration to me. I appreciate the insight and support from my committee members, Professor James Longuski, Professor Martin Corless, and Professor Daniel DeLaurentis. I would like to thank the members of my research group, past and present, for their friendship and collaboration, including Geoff Wawrzyniak, Chris Patterson, Lindsay Millard, Dan Grebow, Marty Ozimek, Lucia Irrgang, Masaki Kakoi, Raoul Rausch, Matt Vavrina, Todd Brown, Amanda Haapala, Cody Short, Mar Vaquero, Tom Pavlak, Wayne Schlei, Aurelie Heritier, Amanda Knutson, and Jeff Stuart. I thank my parents, David and Jeanne Craig, for their encouragement and love throughout my academic career. They have cheered me on through many years of studies. I am grateful for the love and encouragement of my husband, Jonathan. His never-ending patience and friendship have been a constant source of support. Finally, I owe thanks to the organizations that have provided the funding opportunities that have supported me through my studies, including the Clare Booth Luce Foundation, Zonta International, and Purdue University and the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics through the Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need and the Purdue Forever Fellowships.
    [Show full text]
  • Interplanetary Trajectories in STK in a Few Hundred Easy Steps*
    Interplanetary Trajectories in STK in a Few Hundred Easy Steps* (*and to think that last year’s students thought some guidance would be helpful!) Satellite ToolKit Interplanetary Tutorial STK Version 9 INITIAL SETUP 1) Open STK. Choose the “Create a New Scenario” button. 2) Name your scenario and, if you would like, enter a description for it. The scenario time is not too critical – it will be updated automatically as we add segments to our mission. 3) STK will give you the opportunity to insert a satellite. (If it does not, or you would like to add another satellite later, you can click on the Insert menu at the top and choose New…) The Orbit Wizard is an easy way to add satellites, but we will choose Define Properties instead. We choose Define Properties directly because we want to use a maneuver-based tool called the Astrogator, which will undo any initial orbit set using the Orbit Wizard. Make sure Satellite is selected in the left pane of the Insert window, then choose Define Properties in the right-hand pane and click the Insert…button. 4) The Properties window for the Satellite appears. You can access this window later by right-clicking or double-clicking on the satellite’s name in the Object Browser (the left side of the STK window). When you open the Properties window, it will default to the Basic Orbit screen, which happens to be where we want to be. The Basic Orbit screen allows you to choose what kind of numerical propagator STK should use to move the satellite.
    [Show full text]
  • Perturbation Theory in Celestial Mechanics
    Perturbation Theory in Celestial Mechanics Alessandra Celletti Dipartimento di Matematica Universit`adi Roma Tor Vergata Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, I-00133 Roma (Italy) ([email protected]) December 8, 2007 Contents 1 Glossary 2 2 Definition 2 3 Introduction 2 4 Classical perturbation theory 4 4.1 The classical theory . 4 4.2 The precession of the perihelion of Mercury . 6 4.2.1 Delaunay action–angle variables . 6 4.2.2 The restricted, planar, circular, three–body problem . 7 4.2.3 Expansion of the perturbing function . 7 4.2.4 Computation of the precession of the perihelion . 8 5 Resonant perturbation theory 9 5.1 The resonant theory . 9 5.2 Three–body resonance . 10 5.3 Degenerate perturbation theory . 11 5.4 The precession of the equinoxes . 12 6 Invariant tori 14 6.1 Invariant KAM surfaces . 14 6.2 Rotational tori for the spin–orbit problem . 15 6.3 Librational tori for the spin–orbit problem . 16 6.4 Rotational tori for the restricted three–body problem . 17 6.5 Planetary problem . 18 7 Periodic orbits 18 7.1 Construction of periodic orbits . 18 7.2 The libration in longitude of the Moon . 20 1 8 Future directions 20 9 Bibliography 21 9.1 Books and Reviews . 21 9.2 Primary Literature . 22 1 Glossary KAM theory: it provides the persistence of quasi–periodic motions under a small perturbation of an integrable system. KAM theory can be applied under quite general assumptions, i.e. a non– degeneracy of the integrable system and a diophantine condition of the frequency of motion.
    [Show full text]
  • On Optimal Two-Impulse Earth–Moon Transfers in a Four-Body Model
    Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) On Optimal Two-Impulse Earth–Moon Transfers in a Four-Body Model F. Topputo Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract In this paper two-impulse Earth–Moon transfers are treated in the restricted four-body problem with the Sun, the Earth, and the Moon as primaries. The problem is formulated with mathematical means and solved through direct transcription and multiple shooting strategy. Thousands of solutions are found, which make it possible to frame known cases as special points of a more general picture. Families of solutions are defined and characterized, and their features are discussed. The methodology described in this paper is useful to perform trade-off analyses, where many solutions have to be produced and assessed. Keywords Earth–Moon transfer low-energy transfer ballistic capture trajectory optimization · · · · restricted three-body problem restricted four-body problem · 1 Introduction The search for trajectories to transfer a spacecraft from the Earth to the Moon has been the subject of countless works. The Hohmann transfer represents the easiest way to perform an Earth–Moon transfer. This requires placing the spacecraft on an ellipse having the perigee on the Earth parking orbit and the apogee on the Moon orbit. By properly switching the gravitational attractions along the orbit, the spacecraft’s motion is governed by only the Earth for most of the transfer, and by only the Moon in the final part. More generally, the patched-conics approximation relies on a Keplerian decomposition of the solar system dynamics (Battin 1987). Although from a practical point of view it is desirable to deal with analytical solutions, the two-body problem being integrable, the patched-conics approximation inherently involves hyperbolic approaches upon arrival.
    [Show full text]
  • Wobbling Stars and Planets in This Activity, You
    Activity: Wobbling Stars and Planets In this activity, you will investigate the effect of the relative masses and distances of objects that are in orbit around a star or planet. The most common understanding of how the planets orbit around the Sun is that the Sun is stationary while the planets revolve around the Sun. That is not quite true and is a little more complicated. PBS An important parameter when considering orbits is the center of mass. The concept of the center of mass is that of an average of the masses factored by their distances from one another. This is also commonly referred to as the center of gravity. For example, the balancing of a ETIC seesaw about a pivot point demonstrates the center of mass of two objects of different masses. Another important parameter to consider is the barycenter. The barycenter is the center of mass of two or more bodies that are orbiting each other, and is the point around which both of them orbit. When the two bodies have similar masses, the barycenter may be located between NASA the two bodies (outside of either of bodies) and both objects will follow an orbit around the center of mass. This is the case for a system such as the Sun and Jupiter. In the case where the two objects have very different masses, the center of mass and barycenter may be located within the more massive body. This is the case for the Earth-Moon system. scienceprojectideasforkids.com Classroom Activity Part 1 Materials • Wooden skewers 1.
    [Show full text]
  • New Closed-Form Solutions for Optimal Impulsive Control of Spacecraft Relative Motion
    New Closed-Form Solutions for Optimal Impulsive Control of Spacecraft Relative Motion Michelle Chernick∗ and Simone D'Amicoy Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA This paper addresses the fuel-optimal guidance and control of the relative motion for formation-flying and rendezvous using impulsive maneuvers. To meet the requirements of future multi-satellite missions, closed-form solutions of the inverse relative dynamics are sought in arbitrary orbits. Time constraints dictated by mission operations and relevant perturbations acting on the formation are taken into account by splitting the optimal recon- figuration in a guidance (long-term) and control (short-term) layer. Both problems are cast in relative orbit element space which allows the simple inclusion of secular and long-periodic perturbations through a state transition matrix and the translation of the fuel-optimal optimization into a minimum-length path-planning problem. Due to the proper choice of state variables, both guidance and control problems can be solved (semi-)analytically leading to optimal, predictable maneuvering schemes for simple on-board implementation. Besides generalizing previous work, this paper finds four new in-plane and out-of-plane (semi-)analytical solutions to the optimal control problem in the cases of unperturbed ec- centric and perturbed near-circular orbits. A general delta-v lower bound is formulated which provides insight into the optimality of the control solutions, and a strong analogy between elliptic Hohmann transfers and formation-flying control is established. Finally, the functionality, performance, and benefits of the new impulsive maneuvering schemes are rigorously assessed through numerical integration of the equations of motion and a systematic comparison with primer vector optimal control.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Rfi Observations from a Low-Altitude Frozen Lunar Orbit
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20170010155 2019-08-31T01:49:00+00:00Z (Preprint) AAS 17-333 DARE MISSION DESIGN: LOW RFI OBSERVATIONS FROM A LOW-ALTITUDE FROZEN LUNAR ORBIT Laura Plice* and Ken Galal † The Dark Ages Radio Experiment (DARE) seeks to study the cosmic Dark Ages approximately 80 to 420 million years after the Big Bang. Observations require truly quiet radio conditions, shielded from Sun and Earth electromagnetic (EM) emissions, on the far side of the Moon. DARE’s science orbit is a frozen orbit with respect to lunar gravitational perturbations. The altitude and orientation of the orbit remain nearly fixed indefinitely without maintenance. DARE’s obser- vation targets avoid the galactic center and enable investigation of the universe’s first stars and galaxies. INTRODUCTION The Dark Ages Radio Experiment (DARE), currently proposed for NASA’s 2016 Astrophys- ics Medium Explorer (MIDEX) announcement of opportunity, seeks to study the universe in the cosmic Dark Ages approximately 80 to 420 million years after the Big Bang.1 DARE’s observa- tions require truly quiet radio conditions, shielded from Sun and Earth EM emissions, a zone which is only available on the far side of the Moon. To maximize time in the best science condi- tions, DARE requires a low, equatorial lunar orbit. For DARE, diffraction effects define quiet cones in the anti-Earth and anti-Sun sides of the Moon. In the science phase, the DARE satellite passes through the Earth-quiet cone on every orbit (designated Secondary Science) and simultaneously through the Sun shadow for 0 to 100% of every pass (Prime Science observations).
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Mechanics
    Danish Space Research Institute Danish Small Satellite Programme DTU Satellite Systems and Design Course Orbital Mechanics Flemming Hansen MScEE, PhD Technology Manager Danish Small Satellite Programme Danish Space Research Institute Phone: 3532 5721 E-mail: [email protected] Slide # 1 FH 2001-09-16 Orbital_Mechanics.ppt Danish Space Research Institute Danish Small Satellite Programme Planetary and Satellite Orbits Johannes Kepler (1571 - 1630) 1st Law • Discovered by the precision mesurements of Tycho Brahe that the Moon and the Periapsis - Apoapsis - planets moves around in elliptical orbits Perihelion Aphelion • Harmonia Mundi 1609, Kepler’s 1st og 2nd law of planetary motion: st • 1 Law: The orbit of a planet ia an ellipse nd with the sun in one focal point. 2 Law • 2nd Law: A line connecting the sun and a planet sweeps equal areas in equal time intervals. 3rd Law • 1619 came Keplers 3rd law: • 3rd Law: The square of the planet’s orbit period is proportional to the mean distance to the sun to the third power. Slide # 2 FH 2001-09-16 Orbital_Mechanics.ppt Danish Space Research Institute Danish Small Satellite Programme Newton’s Laws Isaac Newton (1642 - 1727) • Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica 1687 • 1st Law: The law of inertia • 2nd Law: Force = mass x acceleration • 3rd Law: Action og reaction • The law of gravity: = GMm F Gravitational force between two bodies F 2 G The universal gravitational constant: G = 6.670 • 10-11 Nm2kg-2 r M Mass af one body, e.g. the Earth or the Sun m Mass af the other body, e.g. the satellite r Separation between the bodies G is difficult to determine precisely enough for precision orbit calculations.
    [Show full text]