DOCSLIB.ORG

End of Project Evaluation Support to the Realization of Human Rights and Access to Justice in Kenya

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
End of Project Evaluation Support to the Realization of Human Rights and Access to Justice in Kenya United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) End of Project Evaluation Support to the Realization of Human Rights and Access to Justice in Kenya (2012 – 2015) November 2015 Evaluation Team Dr. Stephen Otieno (Team Leader) Sylvie Morel-Seytoux Norah Winyi Francis Kabwechere Kari Egge David Solomon Bassiouni Laura Wicks Samantha Nolan The Bassiouni Group Empire State Building 350 5th Avenue, 59th Floor New York, NY 10118 Tel: (917) 403-1136 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... 6 List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Background and Country Development Context ............................................................................... 12 1.1.1 Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) .................................................... 12 1.1.2 National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC) ............................................................. 14 1.1.3 Commission on Administrative Justice (CAJ) ........................................................................ 14 1.2 Overview of Project ......................................................................................................................... 15 1.3 Evaluation Purpose, Objectives and Scope ....................................................................................... 17 1.4 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 18 SECTION 2: ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS ............................................................................................. 20 2.1 Relevance ........................................................................................................................................ 20 2.2 Effectiveness ................................................................................................................................... 23 Result 1: Article 59 Commissions‘ Capacity Strengthened in Order to implement their Mandates More Effectively ............................................................................................................................ 23 Result 2: Capacity of Government Staff Strengthened to Apply a Human Rights Based Approach (HRBA) and Related Principles ..................................................................................................... 26 Result 3: Capacity of State Actors to Understand Government Obligation with Regards to Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Enhanced ............................................................................................. 29 Result 4: Strengthened Framework on Access to Justice at National and County Level Applying HRBA Approach ........................................................................................................................... 33 Result 5: Transitional Justice Processes Strengthened to Effectively Redress Historical Injustices .. 36 Result 6: Capacity of State and Non-State Actors Enhanced to Deliver on Their Human Rights Obligations .................................................................................................................................... 38 Result 7: Electoral Processes Monitored with Respect to Abuse of State Resources, Engagement and Participation of Women, Youth and Other Marginalised Communities ........................................... 42 2.3 Efficiency ........................................................................................................................................ 43 2.4 Impact ............................................................................................................................................. 51 2.5 Sustainability ................................................................................................................................... 54 SECTION 3: KEY LESSONS LEARNED ............................................................................................ 56 1 SECTION 4: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 58 ANNEXES ............................................................................................................................................ 62 Annex 1: Terms of Reference (TOR) ..................................................................................................... 62 Annex 2: List of Persons Interviewed .................................................................................................... 67 Annex 3: List of Documents Consulted .................................................................................................. 70 Annex 4: Data Collection Instruments ................................................................................................... 72 List of Evaluation Questions .......................................................................................................... 72 Annex 5: Evaluation Framework ........................................................................................................... 75 2 Acknowledgements The Bassiouni Group would like to extend its gratitude to the UNDP team; Hanna Ferguson, David Maina, Mary Njoroge and Francis Mwangi for providing oversight and guidance throughout the evaluation process. We would also like to thank Ms. Riika Raatikainen of the Finnish Embassy and Josephine Mwangi-Mweki of the Swedish Embassy in Kenya for their generous assistance to the evaluation team. The team appreciated the generous support offered by the focal persons from the three commissions, KNHCR, NGEC and CAJ. Many individuals, counterparts and stakeholders provided valuable feedback to the team by participating in interviews and focus group discussions – which allowed for rich and diverse data gathering. Our deepest gratitude is extended to all who engaged in the process to ensure that UNDP Kenya‘s commitment to the realization of human rights and access to justice for all reverberates clearly throughout this report. 3 List of Acronyms AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ASALs Arid and Semi Arid Lands CAJ Commission on Administrative Justice CAT Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment CBOs Community Based Organizations CIC Commission on the Implementation of the Constitution CIDP County Integrated Development Plan COTU Central Organization of Trade Unions COYA Company of the Year Award CPAP Country Programme Action Plan CREAW Centre for Rights Education and Awareness CRPD Convention for the Rights of People with Disabilities CSW Commission on the Status of Women CUCs Court User Committees CwDs Children with Disabilities DAC Development Assistance Committee ECJP Ecumenical Centre for Justice and Peace ECOSOC Economic, Social and Cultural Rights FBOs Faith Based Organizations FGD Focus Group Discussion FKE Federation of Kenya Employers GBV Gender-based Violence GOF Government of Finland GOK Government of Kenya GOS Government of Sweden GSU General Service Unit HIV Human Immune-deficiency Virus HRBA Human Rights Based Approach ICC International Criminal Court IDP Internally Displaced Persons IEBC Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission IHRD International Human Rights Day 4 IPCRM Integrated Public Complaints Referral Mechanism KEPSA Kenya Private Sector Alliance KFS Kenya Forest Service KII Key Informant Interview KMJA Kenya Magistrates and Judges Association KNCHR Kenya National Commission on Human Rights KNHREC Kenya National Human Rights and Equality Commission KSG Kenya School of Government LAPSSET Lamu Port, South Sudan Ethiopia Transport Corridor LGBTI Lesbians, gays, Bisexuals, Transgendered and Intersex MDAs Ministries, Departments and Agencies MDGs Millennium Development Goals MoU Memorandum of Understanding MTP Medium Term Plan NACADA National Authority for the Campaign Against Alcohol NFP National Forest Programme NGEC National Gender and Equality Commission NSSF National Social Security Fund NTV Nation Television OHCHR Office of High Commissioner of Human Rights in Kenya PALWECO Programme for Agriculture and Livelihoods in Western Counties PFM Participatory Forest Management PLHIV People Living with HIV PWD People with Disabilities PWGID Protection Working Group for Internally Displaced PSC Project Steering Committee SIGs Special Interest Groups TBG The Bassiouni Group TOR Terms of Reference UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEG United Nations Evaluation Group UNV United Nations Volunteers Programme 5 List of Figures Figure 1: Interview with Ms. Riikkaa of the Finish Embassy in Kenya ................................................... 19 Figure 2: Complaints handling mechanism by the commissions ............................................................. 25 Figure 3: County Secretaries at the NGEC Workshop Validating handbook on gender and Inclusion ..... 28 Fifure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kenya at 50: Unrealized Rights of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples
    report Kenya at 50: unrealized rights of minorities and indigenous peoples By Korir Sing’Oei Abraham Two young Turkana herders near the village of Kache Imeri in Turkana District, northern Kenya. Frederic Courbet / Panos. Acknowledgements also currently represents other minority groups in ongoing This document has been produced with strategic litigation and was a leading actor in the the financial assistance of the European development and drafting of Kenya’s constitutional Union. The contents of this document provisions on minority groups and marginalization. are the sole responsibility of Minority Rights Group International and can Minority Rights Group International under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the Minority Rights Group International (MRG) is a position of the European Union. MRG's local implementation nongovernmental organization (NGO) working to secure the partner is the Ogiek Peoples Development Programme rights of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities and (OPDP). indigenous peoples worldwide, and to promote cooperation and understanding between communities. Our activities are Commissioning Editor: Beth Walker, Production Coordinator: focused on international advocacy, training, publishing and Jasmin Qureshi, Copy editor: Sophie Richmond, outreach. We are guided by the needs expressed by our Typesetter: Kavita Graphics. worldwide partner network of organizations, which represent minority and indigenous peoples. The Author Korir Sing’Oei Abraham is a co-founder of the Centre for MRG works with over 150 organizations in nearly 50 Minority Rights Development. He is a human rights attorney countries. Our governing Council, which meets twice a year, and an advocate of the High Court of Kenya. For more than has members from 10 different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT & Financial Statements 2010-2011
    ANNUAL REPORT & Financial Statements 2010-2011 © KHRC 2011 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Message from the Chair 6 Foreword 7 .0. Introduction to Report 0 .. About the KHRC 0 .2. Context of the Year 0 .3. Introduction 2 2.0. Annual Report 4 2.. Building Social Movements 4 2.2. People’s Manifesto and Scorecard Initiative 7 2.3. Regional Advocacy Initiatives 2 2.4. Monitoring, Documenting and Responding to Human Rights Violations 23 2.5. Constitutional Reform 25 2.6. Transitional Justice 26 2.7. Business, Trade and Human Rights 29 2.8. Communication, Media and Publicity 3 2.9. Equality and Anti-Discrimination Campaign 33 2.0. Kenya Human Rights Institute 34 2.. Sustainability and Programme Effectiveness 34 3.0. Thank You 36 Winning Team 37 Financial Statements 38 • Kenya Human Rights Commission Pamoja Tutetee Haki 2 LisT of Abbreviations 0-20 ALPS Accountability, Learning and Planning System CADL Comprehensive Anti Discrimination Law CBO Community Based Organisation CDF Constituency Development Fund CDF Constituency Development Funds CIC Commission for the Implementation of the Constitution CIOC Constitutional Implementation Oversight Committee CoE Committee of Experts CRECO Constitution and Reform Education Consortium EPAs Economic Partnership Agreements FBOs Faith Based Organisations FCO Foreign and Commonwealth Office FIDA-Kenya Federation of Women Lawyers, Kenya GoK Government of Kenya HRDs Human Rights Defenders HURINETs Human Rights Networks Annual Report and Financial Statements 20 ICC International Criminal Court ICJ-Kenya
    [Show full text]
  • In the Spirit of Harambee
    THE EQUAL RIGHTS TRUST IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE KENYA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION In the Spirit of Harambee Addressing Discrimination and Inequality in Kenya ERT Country Report Series: 1 London, February 2012 The Equal Rights Trust (ERT) is an independent international organisation whose purpose is to combat discrimination and promote equality as a fundamental human right and a basic principle of social justice. Established as an advocacy organisation, resource centre and think tank, ERT focuses on the complex relationship between different types of discrimination, developing strategies for translating the principles of equality into practice. © February 2012 The Equal Rights Trust © Cover February 2012 Dafina Gueorguieva Printed in the UK by Prontaprint Bayswater DesignISBN: and layout: 978-0-9560717-5-0 Dafina Gueorguieva All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by other means without the prior written permission of the publisher, or a licence for restricted copying from the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd., UK, or the Copyright Clearance Centre, USA. The Equal Rights Trust 126 North End Road London W14 9PP United Kingdom Tel. +44 (0) 207 610 2786 Fax: +44 (0) 203 441 7436 www.equalrightstrust.org The Equal Rights Trust is a company limited by guarantee incorporated in England, and a registered charity. Company number 5559173. Charity number 1113288. “Our motto ‘harambee’* was conceived in the realisation of the challenge of national building that now lies ahead of us. It was conceived in the knowl- edge that to meet this challenge, the government and the people of Kenya must pull together.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Impact of Kenya's Trade and Investment Policies and Agreements on Human Rights - 5 the Republic of Kenya: Key Facts
    In cooperation with the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OR HUMAN RIGHTS? Assessing the Impact of Kenya’s Trade and Investment Policies and Agreements on Human Rights International Fact-Finding Mission Article 1 : All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one ano- ther in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2 : Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or terri- tory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or un- der any other limitation of sovereignty. n°506a October 2008 2 Table of contents I. Introducing the Mission........................................................................................................4 Map of Kenya.........................................................................................................................5 The Republic of Kenya: Key Facts........................................................................................6 II. The Human Rights Framework..........................................................................................7 1. Identification of duty holders.............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya National Human Rights Book 2011 EDITED2
    THE THIRD ST THE THIRD STATE OF In the world of Human Rights Protection and enforcement, there are few issues as important as monitoring and accountability, hence a report such as this plays a crucial function in providing a snapshot- a bird’s eye view - HUMAN RIGHTS A of the state of human rights in Kenya in 2010. TE OF HUMAN RIGHTS REPOR REPORT Prof. J Oloka-Onyango, Director of the Human Rights & Peace Centre (HURIPEC) and former Dean of Law at Makerere University, Uganda. It is laudable that this report devotes significant attention to economic and social rights. In Kenya public and policy discussions on access to electricity, water, education, food, health and housing are still not sufficiently linked to T - the discourse on human rights. KNCHR will have made an important A Human Rights Assessment of contribution to the promotion of human rights in Kenya if it succeeds in reshaping the discussions on these rights. Dr. Willy Mutunga Senior Counsel, Regional Representative, Eastern Africa Office, A HUMAN RIGHTS ASSESSMENT Ford Foundation. OF KENYA VISION 2030 K January 2008 - June 2010 eny a V ision 2030 Published by Kenya National Commission on Human Rights Ist Floor, CVS Plaza, Lenana Road P. O. Box 74359 - 00200, Nairobi Kenya Tel: +254 020 2717900/08 Fax: +254 020 271616 Email: [email protected] © Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, 2011 The Third State of Human Rights Report A Human Rights Assessment of Kenya Vision 2030 Published by Kenya National Commission on Human Rights P.O. Box 74359 - 00200 Nairobi Kenya. © Kenya National commission on Human Rights, 2011 Excerpts from this report may be reproduced, provided that there is an acknowledgement to the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights THE THIRD STATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT AA HumanHuman RightsRights AssessmentAssessment OfOf KenyaKenya VisionVision 20302030 JanuaryJanuary 20082008 -- JuneJune 20102010 Kenya National Commission on Human Rights The Third State of Human Rights Report FOREWORD The KNCHR is to be commended for producing its Third State of Human Rights Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (Pdf, 1008
    Human Rights and Business Country Guide Kenya Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 How to Use this Guide .............................................................................................. 3 Rights Holders at Risk ............................................................................................... 7 Child Labour ........................................................................................................... 18 Forced Labour ........................................................................................................ 23 Occupational Health & Safety ................................................................................. 26 Trade Unions .......................................................................................................... 29 Working Conditions ................................................................................................ 33 Environment .......................................................................................................... 39 Land & Property ..................................................................................................... 49 Revenue Transparency & Management .................................................................. 54 Security & Conflict .................................................................................................. 62 Access to Remedy ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Human Rights in the Kenyan Extractive Sector
    The State of Human Rights in the Kenyan Extractive Sector Executive Summary March 2016 State of Human Rights in the Kenyan Extractive Sector Executive Summary Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................... 2 Setting the Scene ......................................................................................... 2 Overview of the State of Human Rights Report .................................. 4 Framework ...................................................................................................................... 4 Audiences ....................................................................................................................... 5 Cross-cutting Themes from the State of Human Rights Report ...... 7 Gaps in the Legal Structure ............................................................................................. 7 Land ............................................................................................................................... 7 Capacity .......................................................................................................................... 8 Key Issues in the Extractive Sector in Kenya – Overview of Field Research ........................................................................................................ 8 Community Engagement ................................................................................................. 9 Impacts on Land Rights ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya0213webwcover.Pdf
    HUMAN RIGHTS HIGH STAKES Political Violence and the 2013 Elections in Kenya WATCH High Stakes Political Violence and the 2013 Elections in Kenya Copyright © 2013 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-986-0 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org FEBRUARY 2013 ISBN: 1-56432-986-0 High Stakes Political Violence and the 2013 Elections in Kenya Map of Kenya .................................................................................................................................... ii Summary ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Post-Election Violence Based on the Kenyan Experience
    Preventing Post-Election Violence Based on the Kenyan Experience Submitted by: Seung Yeon Cho, Erin Connors, Faizaa Fatima, and Utku Yalim Stanford University March 13, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 2 II. THE KENYA EXPERIENCE ............................................................................................... 3 III. METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. 8 IV. PROGRAM MAPPING....................................................................................................... 9 VI. KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................... 13 VI. BEST PRACTICES AND LESSONS LEARNED ........................................................... 18 1 I. INTRODUCTION In 2011, President Obama publicly declared, “preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States of America.”1 A year later, he approved the recommendations of a Presidential Study (PSD-10) focused on ways to enhance the U.S. government’s capacity to do so, including the establishment of the Atrocities Prevention Board (APB). As the APB marks three years of operation, it offers a good opportunity to take stock of the Board’s performance to date in spearheading a robust U.S. policy to effectively prevent and respond to atrocities,
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya National Commission on Human Rights
    KENYA NATIONAL COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS A HUMAN RIGHTS MONITORING REPORT ON THE 2017 REPEAT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 0 1.1 KNCHR Repeat Presidential Election Monitoring Strategy ..................................................... 1 1.3 The Legislative, Political and Electoral Contexts Ahead of the Repeat Presidential Poll. ............. 1 1.4 Judicial Processes and Interventions Ahead of the Repeat Presidential Election ........................ 6 2.0 KNCHR’s Findings on Violations Arising out of the Repeat Presidential Election ................... 9 2.1 Pre-Election Campaigns ................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Electoral Violence ......................................................................................................................... 9 (a) Case of Electoral Violence at Funeral and Burial Functions .................................................. 10 (b) Electoral Violence Involving the Youth: ....................................................................................... 12 2.2.1 Log of Death Cases ................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.2 Injuries ..................................................................................................................................... 21
    [Show full text]
  • Police Powers, Human Rights, and the State in Kenya and Uganda: a Comparative Analysis J
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Valparaiso University Third World Legal Studies Volume 9 Police, Security Forces, and Human Rights in Article 1 the Third World 1-1-1990 Police Powers, Human Rights, and the State in Kenya and Uganda: A Comparative Analysis J. Oloka-Onyango Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/twls Recommended Citation Oloka-Onyango, J. (1990) "Police Powers, Human Rights, and the State in Kenya and Uganda: A Comparative Analysis," Third World Legal Studies: Vol. 9, Article 1. Available at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/twls/vol9/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Third World Legal Studies by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. THIRD WORLD LEGAL STUDIES - 1990 POLICE POWERS, HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE STATE IN KENYA AND UGANDA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS J. Oloka-Onyango* Although when seeking the cure for the individual who has become a social misfit it is important to study his environmental background, it is too easy to make his background the excuse for his social behavior. It may well be that these background influences are so strong that they become overwhelming, but to accept them as an overriding excuse for wrongdoing denies the existence of that "divine spark" in human beings which differentiates them from the beast. They have a will and choice between good and evil.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Watch All Rights Reserved
    HUMAN RIGHTS HIGH STAKES Political Violence and the 2013 Elections in Kenya WATCH High Stakes Political Violence and the 2013 Elections in Kenya Copyright © 2013 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-986-0 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org FEBRUARY 2013 ISBN: 1-56432-986-0 High Stakes Political Violence and the 2013 Elections in Kenya Map of Kenya .................................................................................................................................... ii Summary ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]