Read Caixin, Know China Better
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Climate-Change Journalism in China: Opportunities for International
Climate-change journalism in China: opportunities for international cooperation By Sam Geall Foreword by Hu Shuli 中国气候变化报道： 国际合作中的机遇 山姆·吉尔 序——胡舒立 Climate-change journalism in China: opportunities for international cooperation 中国气候变化报道：国际合作中的机遇 © International Media Support 2011. Any reproduction, modification, publication, transmission, transfer, sale distribution, display or exploitation of this information, in any form or by any means, or its storage in a retrieval system, whether in whole or in part, without the express written permission of the individual copyright holder is prohibited without prior approval by IMS. Cover image by Angel Hsu. © 国际媒体支持组织 版权所有 2011 任何媒体、网站或个人未经“国际媒体支持组织”的书面许可，不得引用、复 制、转载、摘编、发售、储存于检索系统，或以其他任何方式非法使用本报告全 部或部分内容。 封面照片由徐安琪摄。 International Media Support (IMS) Communications Unit, Nørregade 18, Copenhagen K 1165, Denmark Phone: +4588327000, Fax: +4533120099 Email: [email protected] www.i-m-s.dk Caixin Media Floor 15/16, Tower A, Winterless Center, No.1 Xidawanglu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100026, P.R.China http://english.caing.com/ chinadialogue Suite 306 Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT, United Kingdom Phone: +442073244767 Email: [email protected] www.chinadialogue.net Climate-change journalism in China: opportunities for international cooperation By Sam Geall1 Foreword by Hu Shuli2 p4 1. Sam Geall is deputy editor of chinadialogue. The author acknowledges generous contributions to the research and analysis in this report from Li Hujun, Wang Haotong, Eliot Gao and Lisa Lin. Essential input and support were also provided by Martin Breum, Martin Gottske, Isabel Hilton, Tan Copsey, Li Dawei, Ma Ling, Hu Shuli, Bruce Lewenstein and Jia Hepeng. 2. Hu Shuli is editor-in-chief of Caixin Media (the Beijing-based media group that publishes Century Weekly and China Reform), the former founding editor of Caijing magazine and a prominent investigative journalist and commentator. -
Incentives in China's Reformation of the Sports Industry
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Keck Graduate Institute Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2017 Tapping the Potential of Sports: Incentives in China’s Reformation of the Sports Industry Yu Fu Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Fu, Yu, "Tapping the Potential of Sports: Incentives in China’s Reformation of the Sports Industry" (2017). CMC Senior Theses. 1609. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1609 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Tapping the Potential of Sports: Incentives in China’s Reformation of the Sports Industry Submitted to Professor Minxin Pei by Yu Fu for Senior Thesis Spring 2017 April 24, 2017 2 Abstract Since the 2010s, China’s sports industry has undergone comprehensive reforms. This paper attempts to understand this change of direction from the central state’s perspective. By examining the dynamics of the basketball and soccer markets, it discovers that while the deregulation of basketball is a result of persistent bottom-up effort from the private sector, the recentralization of soccer is a state-led policy change. Notwithstanding the different nature and routes between these reforms, in both sectors, the state’s aim is to restore and strengthen its legitimacy within the society. Amidst China’s economic stagnation, the regime hopes to identify sectors that can drive sustainable growth, and to make adjustments to its bureaucracy as a way to respond to the society’s mounting demand for political modernization. -
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK This is a dashboard summary for this bank from E3G’s major report “Banking on Asia: Alignment with the Paris Agreement at six Development Finance Institutions in Asia”. Please see the full report for the detailed analysis behind this summary. Founded: Created in 2016, began operations in January 2016. Note that as AIIB is still a very new institution it has not yet established its full suite of policies, safeguards and best practice which may negatively impact the assessment of its Paris Agreement alignment below. This assessment should be updated with new policy announcement during years to come. Mission: To be lean, clean and green. To improve social and economic outcomes in Asia. To invest in sustainable infrastructure and other productive sectors in Asia and beyond, to better connect people, services and markets that over time will impact the lives of billions and build a better future. Total assets: USD 22.372 billion Headquarters: Beijing, China Top shareholders: China (30.9%), India (8.7%), Russia (6.8%) and Germany (4.7%) Key moments and decisions coming up: – AIIB annual meeting, 2–3 July 2020, China – AIIB corporate strategy to be drafted during 2020, which may incorporate elements of a climate change strategy – Review of Environment and Social Framework – Drafting of Water and Digital Infrastructure Strategies Summary of Paris alignment assessment: The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank is a post-Paris bank, as it was created after the Paris Agreement and therefore has an opportunity to fully integrate the commitment to the Paris goals in all its policies and structures. -
Greenovation Hub
5/1/2018 World Bank The Inspection Panel | Panel joins other IAMs in Meetings with Chinese Government, Banking Representatives to Discuss Accountability – … This is Google's cache of http://www.ghub.org/cfc_en/?p=9164. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Apr 27, 2018 01:50:29 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more. Full version Textonly version View source Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘F (Mac) and use the find bar. Welcome to GHUB Favourite Contact 中文 HOME ABOUT US MEDIA CENTRE SECTORS NEGOTIATION DOWNLOAD JOIN US MORE>> Chi TRACKER Name Email SUBSCRIBE Search SEARC position：Home >> GREEN FINANCE & INVESTMENT >> Content World Bank The Inspection Panel | Panel joins other IAMs in Meetings with Chinese Government, Banking Representatives to Discuss Accountability OCOI 22 | 2017 Guidelines on Environm 日期： 20171129 OCOI 21 | Extension of Global Governa Inspection Panel Chairman Gonzalo Castro de la Mata and Panel Member Jan Mattsson joined OCOI 20 | the Updated Energy Policy o representatives of other Independent Accountability Mechanisms took part in a oneday workshop with Chinese banks with substantial overseas investments in the context of the country’s One Belt, OCOI 17 | the NDB and Sustainable De One Road Initiative to discuss adherence to highest environmental and social standards and the OCOI 15 | Grievance Mechanism and G establishment of redress mechanisms. The workshop was organized by the China Banking Regulatory Commission, China Banking Association, the Green Finance Committee of the China OCOI 14 | The Update on AIIB Progress Society for Finance and Banking, and the Greenovation Hub. -
The Coronavirus Cover-Up: a Timeline
SITUATION BRIEF April 10, 2020 • China Studies Program The Coronavirus Cover-Up: A Timeline How the Chinese Communist Party Misled the World about COVID-19 and Is Using the World Health Organization As an Instrument of Propaganda Executive Summary The People’s Republic of China (PRC) and its ruling Chi- assertions, the harm would have been significantly reduced. nese Communist Party (CCP) have deceived the world Instead, the PRC’s actions and WHO’s inaction precipitat- about the coronavirus since its appearance in late 2019. In ed a pandemic, leading to a global economic crisis and a this situation brief, the Victims of Communism Memorial growing loss of human life. Foundation compares the timeline and facts with China’s ongoing disinformation campaign about the coronavirus’ As a matter of justice, and to prevent future pandemics, the origins, nature, and spread. This brief also demonstrates PRC must be held accountable through demands for eco- how the World Health Organization (WHO) has promoted nomic reparations and other sanctions pertaining to human and helped legitimize China’s false claims. rights. China should also be suspended from full member- ship in the WHO and the WHO, which U.S. taxpayers fund The consequences of China’s deception and the WHO’s cre- annually, must be subject to immediate investigation and re- dulity are now playing out globally. It is normally difficult to form. Media organizations reporting on the claims of China assign culpability to governments and organizations charged and WHO regarding the pandemic without scrutiny or con- with ensuring public health in any pandemic, but the coro- text must be cautioned against misleading the public. -
COVID-19 and China: a Chronology of Events (December 2019-January 2020)
COVID-19 and China: A Chronology of Events (December 2019-January 2020) Updated May 13, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46354 SUMMARY R46354 COVID-19 and China: A Chronology of Events May 13, 2020 (December 2019-January 2020) Susan V. Lawrence In Congress, multiple bills and resolutions have been introduced related to China’s Specialist in Asian Affairs handling of a novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China, that expanded to become the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. This report provides a timeline of key developments in the early weeks of the pandemic, based on available public reporting. It also considers issues raised by the timeline, including the timeliness of China’s information sharing with the World Health Organization (WHO), gaps in early information China shared with the world, and episodes in which Chinese authorities sought to discipline those who publicly shared information about aspects of the epidemic. Prior to January 20, 2020—the day Chinese authorities acknowledged person-to-person transmission of the novel coronavirus—the public record provides little indication that China’s top leaders saw containment of the epidemic as a high priority. Thereafter, however, Chinese authorities appear to have taken aggressive measures to contain the virus. The Appendix includes a concise version of the timeline. A condensed version is below: Late December: Hospitals in Wuhan, China, identify cases of pneumonia of unknown origin. December 30: The Wuhan Municipal Health Commission issues “urgent notices” to city hospitals about cases of atypical pneumonia linked to the city’s Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. The notices leak online. -
2019 Global Meeting
OCTOBER 20-22, 2019 LANSDOWNE RESORT AND SPA, VIRGINIA OCTOBER 20-22, 2019 LANSDOWNE RESORT AND SPA, EMERGING MARKETS FORUM 2019 GLOBAL MEETING The Emerging Markets Forum was created by the Centennial Group as a not-for-prot initiative to bring together high-level government and corporate leaders from around the world to engage in dialogue on the key economic, nancial and social issues facing PROGRAM emerging market countries. The Forum is focused on some 120 market economies in Asia, Eurasia, Latin America and Africa that share prospects of superior economic performance, already have or seek to create a conducive business environment and are of near-term interest to private investors, both domestic and international. Further details on the Forum and its meetings may be seen on our website at http://www.emergingmarketsforum.org The Watergate Oce Building, 2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, Suite 201 Washington, DC 20037, USA. Tel:(1) 202 393 6663 Fax: (1) 202 393 6556 @EmrgMktsForum Email: [email protected] Emerging Markets Forum A nonprofit initiative of the Centennial Group Table of Contents 2019 Global Meeting of the Emerging Markets Forum October 20-22, 2019 Lansdowne Resort & Spa, Virginia Co-Chairs: Michel Camdessus, Governor Emeritus, Banque de France and Former Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) L. Enrique Garcia, Former President and Chief Executive Officer of CAF - Development Bank of Latin America JIN Liqun, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) Takehiko Nakao, President of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Hiroshi Watanabe, President of the Institute for International Monetary Affairs Welcome........................................................ -
24 April 2020 To: President Jin Liqun Asian Infrastructure Investment
24 April 2020 To: President Jin Liqun Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank B9 Financial Street Xicheng District Beijing 10033 People’s Republic of China [email protected] CC: Joachim Von Amsberg, Vice President, [email protected] Michaela Bergman, Principal Social Development Specialist, [email protected] Stephen Lintner, Senior Environmental and Social Adviser, [email protected] Hamid Sharif, Director General, CEIU, [email protected] Via electronic mail Subject: Change in reprisal risks under government responses to Covid-19 Dear President Jin Liqun, The COVID-19 pandemic has forced global actors to respond nimbly to rapidly changing conditions. We are aware of efforts the AIIB has made to support developing economies in this moment of crisis. It is critical that these efforts pay particular attention to and accommodate the individuals most vulnerable to abuses associated with development finance. To date we have not seen any statements clarifying how the AIIB is adapting its approach to risks of reprisals. The current context requires, however, concrete precautionary measures as we have seen increased reprisal risks, including: ● Defenders in lockdown being easier to find and target by authorities, security forces and other potential violators; ● Arbitrary arrest and detention of Defenders under pretext of violation of lockdown rules ● Increased stigmatisation of marginalised groups as contributing to the spread of Covid-19 (i.e., LGBT, Roma people, HIV-positive people, etc.) ● Suspended courts resulting in limited legal recourse -
Mapping the EU-China Cultural and Creative Landscape
MAPPING THE EU‐CHINA CULTURAL AND CREATIVE LANDSCAPE A joint mapping study prepared for the Ministry of Culture (MoC) of the People's Republic of China and DG Education and Culture (EAC) of the European Commission September 2015 1 CO-AUTHORS: Chapters I to III: Cui Qiao - Senior Expert, BMW Foundation China Representative, Founder China Contemporary Art Foundation Huang Shan - Junior Expert, Founder Artspy.cn Chapter IV: Katja Hellkötter - Senior Expert, Founder & Director, CONSTELLATIONS International Léa Ayoub - Junior Expert, Project Manager, CONSTELLATIONS International http://www.constellations-international.com Disclaimer This mapping study has been produced in the context and with the support of the EU-China Policy Dialogues Support Facility (PDSF II), a project financed jointly by the European Union and the Government of the People's Republic of China, implemented by a consortium led by Grontmij A/S. This consolidated version is based on the contributions of the two expert teams mentioned above and has been finalised by the European Commission (DG EAC). The content does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Directorate General Education and Culture (DG EAC) or the Ministry of Culture (MoC) of the People’s Republic of China. DG EAC and MoC are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein. The authors have produced this study to the best of their ability and knowledge; nevertheless they assume no liability for any damages, material or immaterial, that may arise from the use of this study or its content. 2 Contents I. General Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 1. Background .............................................................................................................................. 5 2. Project Description ................................................................................................................. -
Myth-Busting Chinese Corporations in Australia
澳大利亚-中国关系研究院 MYTH-BUSTING CHINESE CORPORATIONS IN AUSTRALIA Colin Hawes Faculty of Law University of Technology Sydney FRONT COVER Thinkstock.com Published by the Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI) PO Box 123 Broadway NSW 2007 Australia e: [email protected] w: www.australiachinarelations.org © The Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI) 2017 ISBN 978-0-9942825-8-3 The publication is copyright. Other than for uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without attribution. CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 Myth-busting Chinese Corporations in Australia 5 Myth One: All Chinese corporations are controlled by the Chinese government 8 Myth Two: China has private corporations, but they are actually controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, either directly or indirectly 15 Myth Three: The Chinese Communist Party and government know what they are doing and act in a unified way 22 Myth Four: China and its corporations are taking over the world (and taking our jobs) 27 Myth Five: Chinese corporate investment in Australia is a threat to our national security 31 Appendix One: Profile of Guo Guangchang 郭广昌 39 Appendix Two: Profile of Wang Jianlin 王健林 42 References 43 About ACRI 58 About the Author 59 MYTH-BUSTING CHINESE CORPORATIONS IN AUSTRALIA 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Among policymakers, media and the broader public, confusion reigns supreme when it comes to Chinese corporations. State- owned enterprises (SOEs) are assumed to be blindly following Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or security service orders with little concern for their own commercial interests. And private Chinese firms are conflated with SOEs and viewed as pawns in the CCP’s regional expansion strategy, despite the enormous growth of the Chinese private sector over the past two decades. -
Macro Policy Update Aug. 16 - Sept
Macro Policy Update Aug. 16 - Sept. 15 Deconstructing Ant Group Focus Ant, the parent of payment provider Alipay, is the world’s most valuable tech startup. Its Deep dive into the month’s planned dual listing in Hong Kong and on Shanghai’s high-tech STAR Market could be the biggest story. biggest initial public offering (IPO) in the world this year. What is Ant, really, and how did it get here? Four pillars The group is currently divided into four basic divisions: - Digital finance - Insurance - International - Smart tech They work together, pulling in users with payments and keeping them around with attractive financial services, then using its proprietary data and synergies between products to upsell them on other products like insurance, before exporting its tech to the financial sector and expanding abroad. In its IPO, Ant wants to downplay the financial label and strengthen its reputation as a tech and big data company, perhaps because such firms generally gain higher valuations, but the reality is that the financial side is essential to the business. Alipay remains the core Started 17 year ago to solve payment challenges facing traders on Alibaba’s Taobao marketplace, it was designed as a Chinese answer to PayPal. Now the number of active Caixin Global Intelligence Weekly Macro Update 1 users on Alipay is more than three times that of PayPal, which is valued at $200 billion. Alipay has come up with a series of financial innovations, each revolutionary: - Rapid mobile payment - QR code payment - Yu’e Bao (e.g. investment of pocket change) - Sesame (e.g. -
Chapter 3 Section 5
SECTION 5: CHINA’S DOMESTIC INFORMATION CONTROLS, GLOBAL MEDIA INFLUENCE, AND CYBER DIPLOMACY Key Findings • China’s current information controls, including the govern- ment’s new social credit initiative, represent a significant es- calation in censorship, surveillance, and invasion of privacy by the authorities. • The Chinese state’s repression of journalists has expanded to target foreign reporters and their local Chinese staff. It is now much more difficult for all journalists to investigate politically sensitive stories. • The investment activities of large, Chinese Communist Par- ty-linked corporations in the U.S. media industry risk under- mining the independence of film studios by forcing them to consider self-censorship in order to gain access to the Chinese market. • China’s overseas influence operations to pressure foreign media have become much more assertive. In some cases, even without direct pressure by Chinese entities, Western media companies now self-censor out of deference to Chinese sensitivity. • Beijing is promoting its concept of “Internet sovereignty” to jus- tify restrictions on freedom of expression in China. These poli- cies act as trade barriers to U.S. companies through both cen- sorship and restrictions on cross-border data transfers, and they are fundamental points of disagreement between Washington and Beijing. • In its participation in international negotiations on global Inter- net governance, norms in cyberspace, and cybersecurity, Beijing seeks to ensure continued control of networks and information in China and to reduce the risk of actions by other countries that are not in its interest. Fearing that international law will be used by other countries against China, Beijing is unwilling to agree on specific applications of international law to cyberspace.