2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan – Update
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Draft Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual - Vol
FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL - VOL. 1 PROJECT #: FMFADA -101-2009 Submitted to the: By: Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority Interpretive Solutions, Inc. West Chester, PA 19382 Old Quarters #1 151 Bernard Road In association with: Fort Monroe, VA 23651 Leisure Business Advisors, LLC Richmond, VA 23223 and Trudy O’Reilly Public Relations JUNE 24, 2010 Hampton, VA 23661 Cover illustration credit: "Fortress Monroe, Va. and its vicinity". Jacob Wells, 1865. Publisher: Virtue & Co. Courtesy the Norman B. Leventhal Map Center at the Boston Public Library Fort Monroe Interpretive Master Plan Technical Support Manual June 24, 2010 Interpretive Solutions, Inc. FORT MONROE DRAFT INTERPRETIVE MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL SUPPORT MANUAL Table of Contents Executive Summary . 6 Three Urgent Needs . 7 Part 1: Introduction . 8 1.1. Legislative Powers of the Fort Monroe Authority . 9 1.2. The Programmatic Agreement . 9 1.3 Strategic Goals, Mission and Purpose of the FMA . 10 1.3 The Interpretive Master Plan . 10 1.3.1 Project Background . 11 1.3.2 The National Park Service Planning Model . 12 1.3.3 Phased Approach . 13 1.3.4 Planning Team Overview . 13 1.3.5 Public Participation . 14 Part 2: Background . 16 2.1 The Hampton Roads Setting . 16 2.2 Description of the Resource . 17 2.3 Brief Historical Overview . 19 2.4 Prior Planning . 22 2.5 The Natural Resources Working Group . 22 2.6. The African American Culture Working Group . 22 Part 3: Foundation for Planning . 24 3.1 Significance of Fort Monroe . 24 3.2 Primary Interpretive Themes . -
Hampton Roads 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan: List of Projects
Hampton Roads g-Range Transportation Plan: 2040 Lon Approved and Adopted July 21, 2016 List of ProjectsUpdated July 29, 2020 R PRIORITY PROJECTS EGIONAL The following section contains the HRTPO Board Approved project sequencing of the Regional Priority Projects based on project readiness for inclusion in the 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan. Planned funding sources for these projects include: the Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF), HRTAC/HRTF Bonds, HRTAC Toll Revenues, and SMART SCALE (formerly House Bill 2) High-Priority Projects Program forecasted revenues between 2016-2040. 1 Sequencing Based on Project Readiness • I-64 Peninsula Widening I • I-64/I-264 Interchange II • I-64 Southside Widening/High-Rise Bridge - Phase 1 III • I-64/Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel Widening • I-64 Southside Widening/High-Rise Bridge - Phase 2 IV • Bowers Hill Interchange • I-64/Fort Eustis Blvd Interchange V • US Route 460/58/13 Connector Approved by the HRTPO Board at its February 18, 2016 Meeting. 2 Estimated Estimated Group Project YOE* Cost Opening Year I-64 Peninsula Widening Segment 1 $123 Million 2017 Segment 2 $190 Million 2019 Segment 3 $311 Million 2022 I I-64/I-264 (including Witchduck Rd Interchange) Phase 1 $157 Million 2019 Phase 2 $190 Million 2021 Phase 3 Study $10 Million 2018 I-64 Southside Widening (including High Rise Bridge) II Phase 1 $600 Million 2021 Hampton Roads Crossing $3 Million Regional Connectors Study 2020 III ($4 Million Contingency) I-64/Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Widening $3.8 Billion 2025 I-64 Southside Widening -
Environmental Assessment
ENVIRONMENTAL APPENDIX NORFOLK HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT/ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT VIRGINIA APPENDIX E1: Biological Assessment U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service May 2018 E1 -1 NORFOLK HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Submitted To: Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Virginia Field Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Norfolk District 803 Front Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510 March 5, 2018 E1 -2 [This page intentionally left blank.] E1 -3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction, Purpose, and, Need ...................................................................................... 3 2.0 Project Scope ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Current Norfolk Harbor Project Dredging and Dredged Material Placement/Disposal Practices ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Dredging and Dredged Material Placement Practices For The Preferred Alternative .... 8 2.3 Project Schedule and Dredging Frequencies ............................................................... 11 2.4 Action Area ................................................................................................................... 11 2.5 Federally LIsted Species With the Potential to Occur in the Action Area ..................... 11 2.6 Alternate Monitoring Methods for Unexploded Ordinance/Munitions of Explosive Concern Screening ........................................................................................................ -
HAMPTON ROADS CLOSURES on WATER CROSSINGS, INTERSTATES and OTHER NOTABLE DETOURS for the Week of Jan
RELEASE: IMMEDIATE Dec. 31, 2020 CONTACT: Media Line: 757-956-3032 [email protected] HAMPTON ROADS CLOSURES ON WATER CROSSINGS, INTERSTATES AND OTHER NOTABLE DETOURS For the week of Jan. 3-9 NOTE: This list covers full closures of interstates, ramps, bridges and primary roads, and lane closures at the bridge-tunnels and the Berkley, Coleman, High Rise and James River bridges. *Scheduled closures are subject to change based on weather conditions and other factors.* For information on the many other lane closures necessary for maintenance and construction throughout Hampton Roads, visit 511Virginia.org, download the 511VA smartphone app, or dial 511. Bridges & Tunnels: Monitor-Merrimac Memorial Bridge-Tunnel, I-664: Single-lane closures northbound on Jan. 4-5 as early as 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. Single-lane closures southbound on Jan. 4-7 as early as 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. Alternating, mobile, single-lane closures northbound on Jan. 6 from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. James River Bridge, Route 17: Single-lane closures in both directions on Jan. 4 from noon to 3 p.m. and on Jan. 5-8 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. HRBT Expansion Project: For lane closures and project updates related to the HRBT Expansion Project, visit HRBTExpansion.org. Elizabeth River Tunnels (Downtown/Midtown Tunnels): Go to Elizabeth River Tunnels for maintenance schedules on the Downtown Tunnel (I-264), Midtown Tunnel (U.S. 58) and MLK Expressway (Route 164). I-64 Widening Segment III Project, York County: Lane closures under flagger control on Lakeshead Drive at the I-64 overpasses on Jan. -
Vtrans2035 Final Report
Virginia’s Long-Range Multimodal Transportation Plan VTrans2035 Report to the Governor and General Assembly Prepared for: Commonwealth Transportation Board Prepared by: Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment January 2010 PREFACE Section 33.1-23.03 of the Code of Virginia directs the Commonwealth Transportation Board, with the assistance of the Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment, to develop a Statewide Transportation Plan (hereafter, VTrans2035) setting forth an assessment of capacity needs for all corridors of statewide significance, regional networks, and improvements to promote urban development areas (Appendix A). Secretary of Transportation Pierce R. Homer created an Executive Oversight Committee, consisting of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation and the heads of the Department of Aviation, Department of Transportation, Department of Rail and Public Transportation, Department of Motor Vehicles and the Virginia Port Authority to help guide the development of VTrans2035. Secretary Homer also created a Multimodal Advisory Committee consisting of technical experts and policy makers to provide the technical expertise required to develop VTrans2035. The following agencies and organizations were represented on this committee: • Federal Highway Administration • Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment • Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions • Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization • Richmond Regional Planning District Commission • Northern Virginia Transportation Authority • Department of Aviation • Department of Transportation • Department of Rail and Public Transportation • Department of Motor Vehicles • Virginia Port Authority VTrans2035 was also developed with the assistance of numerous private firms specializing in the development of long-range plans: • Cambridge Systematics • Economic Development Research Group • Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. • Jack Faucett Associates • KFH Group • Michael Baker, Jr. -
The Design, Feasibility and Cost Analysis of Sea Barrier Systems in Norfolk, Virginia and the Comparative Cost of Shoreline Barriers by Charles H
The Design, Feasibility and Cost Analysis of Sea Barrier Systems in Norfolk, Virginia and the Comparative Cost of Shoreline Barriers by Charles H. Hasenbank Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Naval Engineer and Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2020 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. Author................................................................ Department of Mechanical Engineering May 15, 2020 Certified by. Daniel Frey Professor of Mechanical Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Nicolas Hadjiconstantinou Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Theses 2 The Design, Feasibility and Cost Analysis of Sea Barrier Systems in Norfolk, Virginia and the Comparative Cost of Shoreline Barriers by Charles H. Hasenbank Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on May 15, 2020, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Naval Engineer and Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Abstract Protecting a coastline from the damage of a storm surge, or tidal flooding associ- ated with sea level rise, is a challenging and costly engineering endeavor. Low lying properties located directly on an ocean coastline are limited in protective solutions to include constructing shoreline barriers, increasing building elevations, or relocation. However, shoreline properties on an estuary are afforded the additional protective option of a dynamic sea barrier spanning the mouth of the bay or river. The Delta Works projects in the Netherlands pioneered the design and construc- tion of large scale dynamic sea barriers. Although similar projects have been built or proposed, the high costs have minimized wide spread implementation. -
Sale Brochure
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY FOR SALE 102 S. WITCHDUCK ROAD VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 DIVARIS REAL ESTATE INC // 4525 MAIN STREET, SUITE 900, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 // DIVARIS.COM 102 S. WITCHDUCK ROAD VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 PROPERTY SUMMARY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OFFERING SUMMARY This strategically located 2.45-acre property, at the Witchduck Sale Price: Subject To Offer Road intersection with Interstate 264 in central Virginia Beach, is at the center of a rapidly improving, urbanized corridor. Two Building Size: 22,180 SF new multi-family residential developments, a widening of Witchduck Road with a host of infrastructure improvements, DEMOGRAPHICS 1 MILE 3 MILES 5 MILES and Interstate 64 expansion and flyover, all greatly enhance this prime redevelopment opportunity. Total Households 5,032 44,340 113,363 Total Population 12,784 112,885 299,522 PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Average HH Income $62,346 $70,183 $72,030 • 53,000 vehicles per day, growing to 64,000 soon • Immediate access to I-264 • 2.45 acres • Zoned I-2 • 22,180 sf warehouse, with 2 grade-level doors • Road widening to six (6) lanes underway. DIVARIS REAL ESTATE INC // 4525 MAIN STREET, SUITE 900, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 // DIVARIS.COM PROPERTY SUMMARY // 2 DAVE REDMOND 757.333.4310 [email protected] 102 S. WITCHDUCK ROAD VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 THE WITCHDUCK ROAD RENAISSANCE THE WITCHDUCK ROAD RENAISSANCE This prime redevelopment opportunity, immediately accessible to I-264 and the entire Hampton Roads region, sits at the center of a rapidly growing and improving corridor. The subject property faces Witchduck Road, a major urban arterial in north central Virginia Beach’s Bayside District, one of the most densely populated areas of the city. -
State of the River 2020
State of the Elizabeth River Scorecard 1 State of the Elizabeth River Steering Committee 2020 Acknowledgements Chesapeake Bay Project Funders: Elizabeth River monitoring was enhanced in 2018–2020 through the generous support of the Virginia General Assembly, with special Norfolk James River Naval thanks to Chief Patrons Sen. Lynwood Lewis and Del. Matthew Base Lafayette James. Additional data cited was made possible by multiple project partners and funders including the federally funded Chesapeake Bay Program, National Fish & Wildlife Foundation, the Virginia ODU Department of Environmental Quality, the Virginia Department Craney Island B C of Health, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, National Institute Contents Main of Environmental Health Sciences - SRP grant RO1ES024245, E Norfolk VA Zoo Stem li HRSD, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Acknowledgments 2 za Broad Creek Map: Elizabeth River Health 2020 3 b Center for Conservation Biology at William & Mary, and Old e What the scorecard measures 4 th Dominion University. Special thanks to members of the Elizabeth Summary 5 Port R River Project for making all of our work possible through your iv Nauticus Eastern Emerging challenges 7 Norfolk e D generous support. Western r Branch Special victory 8 Branch C C Contributing Partners: Precautions 9 Portsmouth The Elizabeth River Project took the lead to interpret findings for Swimming 9 the public with coordination of data collection by Mary Bennett, Fishing 9 C Woodstock environmental scientist. Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences managed Southern Branch 10 The little mummichog 13 research funded through a new state allocation for Elizabeth River C Indian River Virginia monitoring, with special thanks to Dr. -
Economic Vitality and Quality of Life Unlocking Hampton Roads
HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION Economic Vitality and Quality of Life Unlocking Hampton Roads HRTAC Overview Kevin B. Page 1/10/2020 Executive Director CONGESTION/FUTURE CONNECTIVITY 2040 Population 2040 Employment The Stage is set for Regional Transportation Solution Consensus Building 2 Unlocking Hampton Roads Unlocking Hampton 3 • For two decades the Region has identified these projects MOVING THE REGION FORWARD HRTAC/HRTF Overview • Hampton Roads Transportation Fund created 2013 Acts of Assembly HB2313 • HRTAC created 2014 Acts of Assembly HB1253 – Hired Executive Director August 2015 • Empowered to procure, finance, build and operate highway, bridge, tunnel, rail and transit projects in Hampton Roads • Authorized to use HRTF monies (and tolls for new construction projects on new or existing highways, bridges and tunnels and to issue bonds using revenues to support Roads Unlocking Hampton bond debt • Regional Collaboration - Works closely with the Hampton 4 Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) who determines Project Prioritization for the region HRTAC Membership 19 Voting members 10 Cities 4 Counties Chesapeake Isle of Wight Franklin James City Hampton Southampton Newport News York Norfolk Poquoson 5 VA General Assembly Members Portsmouth Two Members of the Senate Suffolk Three Members of the House of Virginia Beach Delegates Williamsburg 4 Non-Voting Ex-officio members Commonwealth Transportation Board Member Virginia Department of Transportation Unlocking Hampton Roads Unlocking Hampton Virginia -
City of Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan – It's Our Future: a Choice City
City of Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan – It’s Our Future: A Choice City November 20, 2018 1.3 - SUBURBAN AREA INTRODUCTION Much of the area located north of the Green Line possesses a suburban land use pattern, meaning the area primarily consists of low- to medium-density residential land use with commercial retail, office, and service uses interspersed throughout the area. This land use pattern is the result of more than a century of the development of communities created by subdividing all or portions of the farms that defined Princess Anne County (now the City of Virginia Beach) since the 17th century. The earliest subdivisions were established in the late-19th and early-20th centuries, located adjacent to the railroad line that connected the City of Norfolk to the Town of Virginia Beach. Since the automobile was largely a novelty during these years, movement outside of the urban core cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth was either via the railroad or a poorly maintained roadway system using horse and wagon. The railroad line offered developers the opportunity to establish communities outside the urban core of Norfolk for those who desired to choose a lifestyle less intense than that of Norfolk. This trend of creating communities outside the urban core cities occurred not only here, but throughout the United States, and England as well. Eventually, the area outside the core urban cities was designated as being ‘suburban.’ Vestiges of the early suburban communities in Virginia Beach can be seen in the existing street layout of Pembroke, south of Virginia Beach Boulevard, which were established as Euclid Place (1910) and Sunny Brook (1916). -
Construction Projects in Virginia Beach
Hampton Roads 2034 Long-Range Transportation Plan TTRANSPORTATIONRANSPORTATION PPROJECTROJECT PPRIORITIESRIORITIES ProjectProject InformationInformation GuideGuide TPO TTPORANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION T 11-01 June 2011 HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE JAMES CITY COUNTY PORTSMOUTH Alan P. Krasnoff Bruce C. Goodson Kenneth I. Wright GLOUCESTER COUNTY NEWPORT NEWS SUFFOLK Christian D. Rilee McKinley Price Linda T. Johnson HAMPTON NORFOLK VIRGINIA BEACH Molly J. Ward Paul D. Fraim William D. Sessoms, Jr. ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY POQUOSON WILLIAMSBURG Stan D. Clark W. Eugene Hunt, Jr. Clyde Haulman YORK COUNTY Thomas G. Shepperd, Jr. MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA SENATE The Honorable John C. Miller The Honorable Yvonne B. Miller MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES The Honorable G. Glenn Oder The Honorable John A. Cosgrove TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMMISSION OF HAMPTON ROADS Philip A. Shucet, President/Chief Executive Officer WILLIAMSBURG AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Mark D. Rickards, Executive Director VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Dennis W. Heuer, District Administrator – Hampton Roads District VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Amy Inman, Manager of Transit Planning VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY Jerry A. Bridges, Executive Director HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION NON-VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY NORFOLK SUFFOLK William E. Harrell W. Douglas Caskey Marcus Jones Selena Cuffee-Glenn GLOUCESTER COUNTY JAMES CITY COUNTY POQUOSON VIRGINIA BEACH Brenda G. Garton Robert C. Middaugh J. Randall Wheeler James K. Spore HAMPTON NEWPORT NEWS PORTSMOUTH WILLIAMSBURG Mary Bunting Neil A. Morgan Kenneth L. Chandler Jackson C. Tuttle YORK COUNTY James O. McReynolds FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION Irene Rico, Division Administrator – Virginia Division Letitia A. -
Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 3.15 INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 3.15.1 Regulatory Context and Methodology NEPA legislation does not mention indirect or cumulative impacts; however, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing NEPA address federal agency responsibilities applicable to indirect and cumulative considerations, analysis, and documentation requirements (40 CFR 1508.25) for the environmental consequences section of an EIS (40 CFR 1502.16) (FHWA, 2014). In addition to CEQ’s regulations, indirect and cumulative effects assessment is conducted in accordance with the requirements and processes outlined in 23 CFR Part 771, FHWA Interim Guidance: Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in NEPA (2003), FHWA Position Paper on Secondary and Cumulative Impact Assessment (1992), FHWA’s Questions and Answers on Considering Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in the NEPA Process (2015), the Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 466: Desk Reference for Estimating the Indirect Effect of Proposed Transportation Projects (TRB, 2002), NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 22: Land Use Forecasting for Indirect Impacts Analysis (TRB, 2005), NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 11: Secondary/Indirect and Cumulative Effects Analysis (TRB, 2006), as well as CEQ’s Considering Cumulative Effects under the National Environmental Policy Act (1997) and Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in Cumulative Effects Analysis (2005). CEQ defines indirect effects as “…effects which are caused by the action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable (40 CFR 1508.8[b]). Indirect effects may include growth-inducing effects and other effects related to induced changes in the pattern of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air and water and other natural systems, including ecosystems” (40 CFR 1508.8[b]).