The True Story of Taj Mahal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
This book is dedicated in grateful memory particularly to Her Highness the late Maharani Chandrawati Holkar of Indore, to whose munificence the author owes a part of his academic education, and generally to the great Kshatriya community of India which defended the faith and culture of the country against foreign invasions for milleniums with exemplary devotion to duty, courage, sacrifice and a very high standard of magnanimity and moral purity which distinguish it from all soldiery anywhere in the world. BOOKS {AVAILABLE} BY P.N.OAK 1 World Vedic Heritage 2 Some Blunders Of Indian Historical Research 3 Who Says Akbar Was Great ? 4 Agra Red Fort Is A Hindu Building 5 Some Missing Chapters Of World History 6 The Taj Mahal Is A Temple Palace Hindi Editions Of Books Written By P.N.Oak Are Also Available. CONTENTS XIV SHAHJAHAN WAS INNOCENT OF 129 SOFT FEELINGS Preface to TAJ MAHAL WAS A RAJPUT PALACE XV SHAHJAHAN'S REIGN NEITHER 137 Introduction to the Second Edition GOLDEN NOR PEACEFUL XVI BABUR LIVED IN THE TAJ MAHAL 146 Preface to the Third Edition XVII THE FALSITY OF MEDIAEVAL 152 Introduction to this Edition MUSLIM CHRONICLES Photocopy of Badshahnama, Vol. 1, Pages 402-403 XVIII THE LADY OF THE TAJ 159 Photocopy of Aurangzeb's Letter XIX THE ANCIENT HINDU TAJ EDIFICE 165 IS INTACT Chapters XX THE TAJ MAHAL HAS HINDU 169 I THE NEED TO RE-EXAMINE 37 DIMENSIONS ANTECEDENTS XXI THE MUSLIM OVERWRITING 180 II ADMISSION IN SHAHJAHAN'S OWN 40 BADSHAHNAMA XXII CARBON - 14 DATING OF THE TAJ 183 MAHAL III TAVERNDIER 52 XXIII SHAHJAHAN'S OWN ANCESTOR 194 IV AURANGZEB'S LETTER AND 64 ADMIRED THE TAJ RECENT EXCAVATION XXIV THE TAJ MAHAL ORIGINATED AS A 198 V PETER MUNDY'S EVIDENCE 72 TEMPLE VI SOME ENCYCLOPAEDIC VERSIONS 80 XXV THE FAMOUS PEACOCK THRONE 209 WAS HINDU VII A RECENT CONCOCTION OF THE 87 SHAHJAHAN LEGEND XXVI INCONSISTENCIES IN THE LEGEND 213 VIII YET ANOTHER CONFUSED 94 XXVII BALANCE SHEET OF EVIDENCE 236 ACCOUNT XXVIII METHODOLOGY THAT LED TO THE 243 IX THE BADSHAHNAMA VERSION 99 DISCOVERY ANALYSED XXIX SOME CLARIFICATIONS 249 X TAJ MAHAL CONSTRUCTION 103 XXX A PICTORIAL ANALYSIS 265 PERIOD XI TAJ MAHAL COST 108 XII WHO DESIGNED, WHO BUILT THE 115 TAJ ? XIII THE TAJ IS BUILT TO HINDU 122 SPECIFICATIONS Preface 9 To my amazement it led me to an unexpected conclusion, namely, that far from originating as a mediaeval tomb the Taj was built by a powerful Rajput king as his palace in pre-Muslim times. PREFACE My research has also led to an incidental but nonetheless important finding, that the Peacock Throne too is perhaps as ancient TO as the Taj Mahal, and that it used to be placed in the chamber Taj Mahal was a Rajput Palace which encloses the cenotaphs of Shahjahan and Mumtaz. My conclusions are based on a number of historical works, both mediaeval and modern. A list of them appears at the end of this book. I have quoted from those authorities extensively. The serene beauty, majesty and grandeur of the Taj Mahal The extracts, accompanied by the relevant details about the name have made it known all over the world. But what is not so well of the book, author and page number, have been included in the known is the true story of its origin, that its magnificence stems narrative itself instead of appearing as footnotes at the bottom from its having originated as a palace. of each page. It is a pity that the Taj Mahal is believed to have originated The conclusions reached in this book might unsettle some as a sombre tomb in the 17th century when it was perhaps built important portions of mediaeval history as currently taught and in the 4th century to serve as a palace. presented. But since all education is a relentless search for the Truth it is hoped that all readers, whether lay admirers of the The suddenness with which his gay and magnificent palace got Taj, prying scholars or researchers, archaeological officials or converted into a tomb must have constituted & very unfortunate teachers of history, will neither shy away nor be scared in facing occurrence of Jaisingh's life. the truth about the Taj. The changeover has proved a shroud deluding everybody from lay visitors to researchers and history scholars that the Taj was built as a sepulchre. February, 1965 P. N. Oak Popular nostalgia for legendary love has helped fan the flame of Shahjahan's mythical attachment to Mumtaz into a raging fire, enveloping the Taj in the dazzle of leaping flames and blinding smoke of imaginary accounts, discouraging any cool, dispassionate research about its origin. The utter incompatibility and inconsistency of the loose bits of information mouthed and written about the Taj Mahal, clanking to a crescendo of jarring notes in my subconscious mind. Impelled me to attempt sorting them out from a tangled mass and piecing them together to find out whether they made a coherent and plausible account. published April 1966, a forerunner to the present volume. Introduction 11 Taj Mahal being suspect, it was but natural that attempts at compiling an authoritative account of the origin of the Taj Mahal should miserably fail. Nobody ever succeeded in or hoped to say the last convincing word on the origin of the Taj Mahal. All previous attempts INTRODUCTION were bound to fail since they were all based on a wrong notion. To Starting with wrong premises they could not arrive at the right The Second Edition conclusion. We are going to prove in the following pages that the Taj Mahal - meaning "the Very Crown Among Residences" - is an ancient Unlike this book and its forerunner, titled Taj Mahal was a Hindu building and not a Muslim tomb. We shall also show how Rajput Palace, which are research works, all other books and accounts all the loose bits of information - whether factual or concocted of the Taj Mahal written during the last 300 years are based on - dished out on the platter of the Shahjahan legend fall in place pure fantasy. We were surprised to learn after meticulous inquiry and fully support our research. Just as the solution to a mathematical that despite the plethora of printed hocus-pocus churned out on problem may be tested for its accuracy by various methods, similarly, the Taj Mahal all the world over there is not a single book containing sound historical research provides a consistent and coherent story a well-documented, comprehensive account of the origin of the reconciling all apparent inconsistencies. Taj Mahal quoting exhaustively only contemporary authorities. In this book we have produced in photostat a passage from Subsequent hearsay accounts are hardly worth any notice for Shahjahan's court chronicle, the Badshahnama, which disarmingly historical research, since one writer's opinion is as good as any admits that the Taj Mahal is a commandeered Hindu palace. We other's. have also quoted the French merchant Tavernier, who visited India Since the Taj Mahal is a building complex of world renown during Shahjahan's reign, to say that the cost of the scaffolding the absence of a single coherent and unquestionably authentic account exceeded that of the entire work done regarding the mausoleum. is indeed surprising. How and why have universities and research This proves that all that Shahjahan had to do was engrave Koranic institutions the world over bypassed such a stupendous and attractive texts on the walls of a Hindu palace; that is why the cost of the subject like the Taj Mahal ? Why do all accounts of the Taj Mahal scaffolding was much more than the value of the entire work done. content themselves with merely lisping the self-same, confused, We have cited the Encyclopaedia Britannica as stating that the Taj irreconcilable and slipshod, imaginary details about its origin, viz. Mahal building-complex comprises stables and guest and guard the period of construction, the expense incurred, the source of rooms. We have quoted Mr. Nurul Hasan Siddiqui's book admitting, the money spent, the designers and workmen, the date of Mumtaz's as the Badshahnama does, that a Hindu palace was commandeered burial in it, and every other facet? to bury Muntaz in. We have cited Shahjahan's fifth-generation ancestor Babur to prove that he lived in what we call the "Taj Perhaps it is just as well that no scholarly body ever succeeded Mahal" 100 years before the death of the lady for whom the Taj in producing a coherent and authoritative account of the building is believed to have been built as a mausoleum. We have also quoted of the Taj Mahal. Whosoever attempted to do any research on Vincent Smith to show that Babur died in the Taj Mahal. In addition the subject got lost in such a maze of inconsistent and contradictory to these proofs we have scotched the Shahjahan legend in every accounts that he found himself helplessly repeating the same old detail and cited other voluminous evidence proving conclusively that abracadabra. He had to be content with placing before the reader the Taj Mahal is an ancient Hindu building. loose bits of inconsistent, anomalous and contradictory versions on every point. All aspects of the Shahjahan legend regarding the 12 The Taj Mahal Is A Temple Palace Introduction 13 The overwhelming proof that we have produced in this book should once for all silence all doubters of the correctness of our eminent scholars of history. Most of them expressed nothing but finding and convince them that the whole world can go wrong where vehement contempt either audibly or through various acts of one man proves right.