e s U l a r u R s e c r u o s e R l a r u t a N f o t n e m t r a p e D a n a i d n I d n a y e v r u S l a c i g o l o e G . S . U : s e c r u o S a t a D

D G M 0 0 5 > 4 2 1 0

N

y t n u o C w e m o l o h t r a B

y l p p u S c i l b u

P ¸#

D G M 0 0 5 - 0 0 1

s e l i M

. c s i M ¸#

D G M 0 0 1 - 0 5

n i e s U d n

¸# a S " n o i t a g i r r I

y t i C D G M 0 5 - 0

¸# 1

y r t s u d n

I ¸#

D G M 0 1 <

y t n u o C

s e c r u o s e R r e t a W

g n i n i M / y g r e n

E ¸#

) D G M ( w o l F 2 Q 7 e t a t s r e t n I

E K A T N I L L E

¸# ¸# W

r e v i R

s e k a L r o j a

M ¸# n o i t a c o L l a w a r d h t i

¸# W

y t i n u m m o C r e s U S I G e h t d n a , o p o t s s i w s , P G I , N G I , d i r g o r e A , g n i p p a m t e G , X E A , S G S U , A D S U , d e b u c - i , e y E o e G , e b o l G l a t i g i D , i r s E : e c r u o S

¸#¸#

J a c k s o n

J

J

e

a B a r t h o l o m e n w

c

n

k

i s

n

o

g

n J c a s k n s o

B w o r ¸# n

¸# ¸# ¸# ¸# ¸#¸#

B

a

J

r

e

t

h

n

o

n

l

i

o

n m k

g

s

e

w r

r o

e F

i

v

R t

s

a E e

t i

h

W

J e n

i n

s g

n ¸#

B a S r " h t o m o l w e

n w o t h t e b a z i l E

¸# ¸# ¸#¸#¸#

¨¦§

I

-

6

5 ¸#¸#

S "

B s u b m u l o C a

r

B

t

h

r

o

o

l

w

o

n m

e ¸# ¸# w ¸# ¸# # ¸# ¸# ¸ ¸# ¸# ¸# ¸#

r

e

v i

R

d o

¸#o w

t

B f

i a

r

r

D

t

h e S

" D

o c

a

l

o

t

u

m

e l l i v s r o l y a

r T

e

w S "

e p o H

a B h t r l o m o w e

J o h n s

o

n

B a r t

h

o

l o

m e w

S

¸# "

D e c a t u r

S

"

S

h

e

l

b y

R

S h e l b y i

v

B

h g r u b n i d E

e

i

¸#¸# g r

B

l

u ¸## n e ¸ y

¸# o

¸ b

s

l

n

e

h

h

o S ¸#¸# J ¸# ¸# ¸# ¸# ¸#¸#

¸#

S " Joseph E. Kernan, Governor Department of Natural Resources Division of Water John Goss, Director Aquifer Systems Map 17-B BEDROCK AQUIFER SYSTEMS OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY, R. 7 E. R. 8 E. R. 6 E. R. 7 E.

R. 5 E. R. 6 E. T. 10 N.

E

0

0 9

R. 4 E. R. 5 E.

d d a

R Driftwood o 3 2 1 e Edinburgh 4 R

5 n N 6 T. 11 N. i 950 Road y l ounty 1 Fishing C t e 3 4 n T. 10 N. s 5 d 6 2 u Area a R 1 o rd 3 2 B ffo 4 C Sta 5 1 6 3 2 N

i 9 n e k

Atterbury R e v 0 N e e County Road 90 S r h Fish k C e 10 11 12 e 9 and 7 8 Creek 12 r C k 11 C r Wildlife 10 e 9 w e 7 8 a k e 11 e 12 e k Area 9 10 r H e r 8 C County Road 800 N C 7 E 575 Road County 11 12 10 k c h u g w

a D D u o H h

r

T i g

W 13

f 31 17 16 15 14

u t 18 ut 0

w 13 o

5 e l

14 l E

o 15

d 16 t Rugby S t The occurrence of bedrock aquifers depends on the original composition of the rocks and

17 0

o a 18 I Devonian and Mississippian --

13 0

g o M d 14 i L 15 0 subsequent changes which influence the hydraulic properties. Post-depositional 16 R r 1 B New Albany Shale Aquifer System u 17

y e d

d 18 t v processes, such as jointing, fracturing, and solution activity, generally increase the a

13 n i 14 o

15 u R !C hydraulic conductivity (permeability) of the upper portion of bedrock aquifer systems.

o C

R

700 N E C ounty Road

C y t

0 Because permeability is generally greatest near the bedrock surface, bedrock units within The New Albany Shale Aquifer System in Bartholomew County is an extremely limited n

0 Hope u

R 6 03-01805-PS

the upper 100 feet are commonly the most productive aquifers. Creek o ground-water resource. This aquifer system consists mostly of brownish-black carbon-

i d v 20 C 24 a 21 22 23 e 19 24 o rich shale, greenish-gray shale, and minor amounts of dolomite and dolomitic quartz

r 23 R 21 22 Bedrock aquifer systems in the county are overlain by unconsolidated deposits of varying 20 y sandstone. h 24 19 t

c n Camp n 22 23 thickness. Most of the bedrock aquifers in the county are under confined conditions. In ra 21 u B 20 o

19 C other words, the potentiometric surface (water level) in most wells completed in bedrock The New Albany Shale in Bartholomew County can be up to 120 feet thick and generally 24 k 22 23 N Taylorsville County Road 600 N e y ad 650 C! e rises above the top of the water-bearing zone. thickens as it dips southwest beneath younger strata. The outcrop/subcrop area is present d unty Ro r d Co C u y along an approximate north-south band of the west-central portion of the county and M ft k li The yield of a bedrock aquifer depends on its hydraulic characteristics and the nature of along the eastern south-central edge of the county. Depth to bedrock is typically 30 to 75 c 27 26 C 25 o County Road 550 N 30 29 28 the overlying deposits. Shale and glacial till act as aquitards, restricting recharge to feet. Completed well depths are typically 60 to 130 feet and penetrate 10 to 70 feet of r Clifford t 27 26 a 28 25 underlying bedrock aquifers. However, fracturing and/or jointing may occur in aquitards, bedrock. l 30 29 25 F Atterbury 27 26 d which can increase recharge to the underlying aquifers. Hydraulic properties of the R 28 k 29 r e County Road 500 N 30 r e bedrock aquifers are highly variable. This aquifer system is considered a poor ground-water resource and is generally 25 a r 27 26 ek C e M r k described as an aquitard. However, a few domestic wells have been completed in this

C w e E

a e k 0 Three bedrock aquifer systems are identified for Bartholomew County. They are, from system. Typical yields are 10 gpm or less with some dry holes reported. Static water r Lic H Nortonburg 5 C 8

C west to east, youngest to oldest: the Borden Group of Mississippian age; the New Albany levels typically range from 10 to 40 feet below surface.

d k o 450 N County Road a 34 35 36 c u 33 31 32 o Shale of Devonian and Mississippian age; and the Silurian and Devonian Carbonates.

n u

35 R t 34 y 36 33 D The permeability of shale materials is considered low. The New Albany Shale Aquifer

y

32 t R 31

36 n

o 35 System, therefore, has a low susceptibility to contamination introduced at or near the Military 34 u The susceptibility of bedrock aquifer systems to surface contamination is largely

a

o

d 32 33 D T. 10 N.

C surface. 31 r dependent on the type and thickness of the overlying sediments. Just as recharge for 36 5 i 0 d 450 N T. 9 N. 35 County Roa ft 34 0 bedrock aquifers cannot exceed that of overlying unconsolidated deposits, susceptibility

w E

W o Hartsville 00 N 0

o County Road 4 d to surface contamination will not exceed that of overlying deposits. However, because 0

d R

7

y the bedrock aquifer systems may have complex fracturing systems, once a contaminant Silurian and Devonian d

e a l 2 1 l

o 5 3

T. 10 N. a 1 6 4 has been introduced into a bedrock aquifer system, it will be difficult to track and Carbonates Aquifer System R

T 2

3 y remediate. T. 9 N. 65 5 4 t 6 n W ¦¨§ 1 Reservation 2 u Lo 0 3 o w 4 3 C In Bartholomew County, the outcrop/subcrop area of the Silurian and Devonian 5 R e 3 6 ll 1 R i 2 d d v Carbonates Aquifer System is present along most of the eastern half of the county. This 3 a e Mississippian -- Borden Group o r

R system includes middle-Devonian age carbonates (limestone and dolomite) of the Aquifer System y 6 t 4 Muscatatuck Group and the underlying carbonates of Silurian age. Because carbonate n SR u Huffer Rd 10 11 12 o units of Silurian and Devonian age are similar, and cannot easily be distinguished on the d 250 N 7 8 C County Roa 12 d 9 R basis of water well records, they are considered as a single water-bearing system. 9 10 11 nd In Bartholomew County, the Mississippian age Borden Group Aquifer System is present 12 7 8 nla Newbern

W 11 Su in most of the western third of the county. This bedrock aquifer system is composed 10 9 0 The Muscatatuck Group in Bartholomew County is up to 75 feet thick and generally 8 0 mostly of siltstone and shale, but fine-grained sandstones are also common. Although

7 2

12 C

11 d k increases in thickness as it dips to the southwest beneath younger rock formations. The

10 o carbonates are rare, discontinuous interbedded limestone lenses are present, mostly in the a r C u k o 31 e n ut

a e Fa Fo upper portion of the group. underlying Silurian carbonates are up to 150 feet thick and also thicken as they dip to the t R

h t r l l

e y Petersville C 13 s r y i 0 N

20 t southwest. The combined thickness, therefore, is up to 225 feet with depth to bedrock d R n County Roa E

e n

o 0

u 15 14 a

16 0 typically 20 to 50 feet below surface. Completed well depths range from 20 to 365 feet, E

o 17 The Borden Group in Bartholomew County is up to 600 feet thick and generally thins as

d 18 C 13 1

C

r 14 0

e 3 1

ek 15 5 it dips to the southwest beneath younger rock formations. Depth to bedrock is typically but are typically 60 to 110 feet. The typical amount of bedrock penetrated ranges from

2

16 d

8 5 17 C! 18 a

13 03-02867-IR d 25 to 70 feet. 14 o W 20 to 55 feet. Well depths in the Borden Group Aquifer System range from 30 to 400 15 C! a ad 100 N

nty Ro R C! o Cou

17 16 R

y y feet. However, wells are typically completed at depths of 40 to 85 feet and typically 18 t f t

13 i E y

l n 15 14 t In Bartholomew County, water wells in the Silurian and Devonian Carbonates Aquifer

C u

5 penetrate 5 to 50 feet of bedrock.

Columbus C! n

o

7

u

4 o

C System are capable of meeting the needs of domestic and some high-capacity users.

C d ounty Road 100 N a Because the Borden Group is generally not very productive, it is typically used only Typical domestic yields range from 5 to 20 gpm. Two facilities with high-capacity wells C o 24

R 22 23

Baker Hollow Rd 24 19 20 21 where overlying deposits do not contain an aquifer. The Borden Group is commonly have reported yields that range from 90 to 450 gpm. Static water levels range from 15 to

y E

23 t

22 n

21 County Road 50 N 0 described as an aquitard, and yields of wells completed in it are usually quite limited. 40 feet below surface with some drillers reporting “flowing” wells. u

20 5

19 o 24 6 23 k

C Many wells, however, are able to produce sufficient water for domestic purposes by 22 e d

21 e a

20 o Most of the Silurian and Devonian Carbonates Aquifer System is overlain by thick clay 19 Cr relying on extra well-bore storage created by drilling relatively large diameter and 24 R Rd 23 w Base Line deposits. Therefore, most of the aquifer system is considered at low risk to y relatively deep wells. The yield of most domestic wells completed in the group is less 22 a t ek H n re SR 46 u than 10 gallons per minute (gpm). Dry wells have been reported. Static water levels are contamination. However, in some areas the aquifer system is overlain by unconsolidated SR 46 C o SR C typically between 10 and 35 feet below surface. deposits composed primarily of sand and gravel outwash materials. These deposits may 7 27 26 25 30 29 28 have thin clay at the surface. In such areas, the aquifer system is considered at moderate 26 25 28 27 The Borden Group is composed primarily of fine-grained materials that limit the to high risk. Wolf 25 30 29 27 26 movement of ground water. In areas where overlying clay materials are present, the Rd 28 ny 29 County Road 100 S ha 30 1 Borden Group Aquifer System is at low risk to contamination from the surface or near

t E 1

e 25 B 26 0 surface. However, in some areas the bedrock is overlain by outwash materials that may

27 5

R

2

S be capped by thin deposits of eolian derived loess, colluvium, or lacustrine silt. These d

k a e o areas are at moderate risk to contamination. e

R 35 36 d 33 34 r R y 31 32 k t 35 36 C ee n 34

r u fc 32 33

31 o ol 35 36 9 W 34 C R 32 33 ek S T. 9 N. 31 E re C E T. 8 N. 36 a oad 200 S r 35 s County R a 0 t E 34 0

e 2

0

E Burnsville B

1

C 5

5

7 oun d

2 a

d

5

o

a 2 1

t d

F o 3 R

y R

a 4

T. 9 N. o 5 R

y o 1 6 r 2 t

3 y R n o

k E t

T. 8 N. 4

5 u a y n

6 y

t 0

t d o

1 f u

0 i n

2 o

l C 750

3 3 u

4

C C o

5 d County Road 300 S

a C

W 6 2 1 Deni o

3 R os

C y reek t k Road 300 S n e ry u e ount r

C o 11 12 C C 10 C 12 9 o 10 11 7 8

u 8 9 Grammer

n E

7 ek t 12 W re

y C 11 0

5 h R 9 10 h

1 s

i

o 8 t u d a e r 0 S 7 a Road 40 d County

o B

12 E

5

10 11 R

5 Cooks

0 y S

e t k R i 800

P W

ville n 7 u

Bells d 14 13 a

R o 15 o

C 16

iv d

n R 17 e Sa 14 13 18

r 15 y 17 16 t 13 18 k n 16 15 14 e ee u l r o Litt C Road 500 S Ogilville17 C County 18 SR 58 Elizabethtown 14 13

15 R. 7 E. R. 8 E.

E

23

W Location Map

350

0

d d 5 a 24

1 31 o

20 21 22 ut d

24 19 R

a

y y o 23 County Road 550 S t 22 R

21

20 y

oun t

19 n C

W

24 u

23 0 22 o 0 h 65 C 7 § c ¦¨ n d County Road 600 S

a a

o r

R B W

Grouse Waynesville y 25 t 27 26 n 29 28

Ridge 400 u 25 30

o d d

a 26 C 27 29 o 28

30 R

y y t 26 25White EXPLANATION

27 E

0

oun 5

C County Road 700 S

4

Sand Registered Significant Ground- d 1010.5 Mile

W C!

a

Azalia o water Withdraw Well E 35 36 34 R

a

M 100 33

32 y

s

t oun d

31 t n

a 36 C u County Road t 35 o

H 34 o e r 33 R a e 32 C l 31 y th 36 e t T. 8 N. y 35 k 34 R T. 7 N. State Roads & US Highways d d oun 1010.5 Kilometer

F R C y 1 a 1 o r E Road 800 S p County r S a R k s S County Road 850 S Interstate t 2 T. 8 N. 3 1 4 T. 7 N. F 6 5 W o 2 1 h Stream r

W 3 i t 4 k e 5 0 F 6 0 e

1 3

r 12 g 3 2 d Creek Lake & River u rk W a s

h o 8 Fo i te o

5 R

n h ut 11

o y d S R U.S. Military Reservation R t n

C n S d a R. 6 E. R. 7 E. r u W S Camp Atterbury

e o R 10 e C h k i 9 i Waymansville t 8 v

C e 7 10 12 e o 11 r State Managed Property

u Jonesville C C 8 n oun 9 t ty r 7 y 12 Ro Count e a y Road 950 e R d S 10 11 93 k o 0 S 15 Municipal Boundary

a

d

4

5

0

W S 16 ® ey 17 m 13 18 ou 15 14 r R d 16 13 18 17 15 14 County Road 1100 S

R. 5 E. R. 6 E.

R. 4 E. R. 5 E.

Map Use and Disclaimer Statement This map was created from several existing shapefiles. Township and Range Lines of Indiana (line shapefile, 20020621), Land Survey Lines of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621) and Bedrock Aquifer Systems of Bartholomew County, Indiana We request that the following agency be acknowledged in products derived County Boundaries of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621), were all from the Indiana Geological from this map: Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water. Survey and based on a 1:24,000 scale, except the Bedrock Geology of Indiana (polygon shapefile, by 20020318) which was at a 1:500,000 scale. Draft road shapefiles, System1 and System2 (line Map generated by Jennifer K. Mc Millan and Joseph L. Phillips This map was compiled by staff of the Indiana Department of Natural shapefiles, 2003), were from the Indiana Department of Transportation and based on a 1:24,000 Randal D. Maier IDNR, Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section Resources, Division of Water using data believed to be reasonably accurate. scale. Populated Areas in Indiana 2000 (polygon shapefile, 20021000) was from the U.S. Census Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section However, a degree of error is inherent in all maps. This product is distributed Bureau and based on a 1:100,000 scale. Streams27 (line shapefile, 20000420) was from the “as is” without warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied. This map Center for Advanced Applications in GIS at Purdue University. Managed Areas 96 (polygon is intended for use only at the published scale. shapefile, various dates) was from IDNR. December 2004 Joseph E. Kernan, Governor Department of Natural Resources Division of Water John Goss, Director Aquifer Systems Map 17-A UNCONSOLIDATED AQUIFER SYSTEMS OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY, INDIANA R. 7 E. R. 8 E. R. 6 E. R. 7 E. T. 11 N. R. 5 E. R. 6 E. T. 10 N. Seven unconsolidated aquifer systems have been mapped in Bartholomew County: the Till Veneer / Dissected Till and Residuum; the Alluvial, Lacustrine, and Backwater Deposits; the New Castle / Scottsburg Till Aquifer Subsystem R. 4 E. R. 5 E. d

R New Castle / Scottsburg Till System; the New Castle / Scottsburg Till Subystem; the New Castle e 1 03-01091-IR n i 0 N 3 2 l County Road 95 6 4 / Scottsburg Complex; the and Tributaries Outwash; and the White River and T. 11 N. Driftwood C! e 5 Edinburgh C! s a 5 3 Tributaries Outwash Subsystem. Boundaries of these aquifer systems are commonly gradational The New Castle / Scottsburg Till Aquifer Subsystem is mapped similar to the New Castle / T. 10 N. Fishing 6 4 1 Rd B 2 ford 3 03-04018-IR 1 Staf and individual aquifers may extend across aquifer system boundaries. Scottsburg Till Aquifer System, however, outwash aquifer deposits are generally much thinner Area C! 2 C! 4 03-01991-IR and potential yield is less. In Bartholomew County this system is mapped predominantly along a 5 03-04317-IR C! 03-03180-IR

N 6 The thickness of unconsolidated sediments in Bartholomew County is quite variable. Sediments north-south band in the west-central part of the county. It is also present in several smaller areas E

1 9

3 2 i

n 0 that overlie bedrock range from exposure near the east county line along portions of the Fall Fork in the eastern half of the county. R

e Atterbury County Road 900 N 0 9

v S e C! of Clifty Creek, to as much as 155 feet. h Fish 03-04470-IR 03-03238-IR d 03-04304-IR a 12 o C 03-02209-IR C! C! 7 8 9 10 11 Approximately 39 percent of wells completed in the area bypass the unconsolidated deposits in and R

r 12

e C! 11 y Regional estimates of aquifer susceptibility to contamination from the surface can differ favor of the underlying bedrock aquifer system. However, this system is capable of meeting the e Wildlife 9 10 k t

11 n P k 10 7 e 8 u considerably from local reality. Variations within geologic environments can cause variation in ri 12 e needs of some domestic users. Well depths range from 20 to 157 feet but are typically 45 to 80 nce Area 9 C! 03-03600-IR Old r o C 03-03601-IR C re 8 C County Road 800 N susceptibility to surface contamination. In addition, man-made structures such as poorly feet deep. Aquifer deposits are commonly 3 to 10 feet thick. Surficial clay and sandy-clay ek 12 7 03-04114-IR C! C! St. Louis k St. Louis w e a constructed water wells, unplugged or improperly abandoned wells, and open excavations, can e H deposits overlying aquifer materials are commonly from 30 to 70 feet. 10 11 Crossing r tle provide contaminant pathways that bypass the naturally protective clays. C it h L h g Well yields are typically 5 to 15 gpm with static water levels commonly from 20 to 45 feet below

g W u

15 k u o 14 0 13 surface. Greater capacities are often associated with significant to complete drawdowns. Some e T 17 16 o

e 5 18 13 r l

d Till Veneer / Dissected Till and Residuum Aquifer C S 17 14 dry holes have been reported. Also, many drillers continue borehole depths beneath the aquifer

a 15 d 16 E

31 u g o 18 Rugby ¤£ i 13 0 units to create storage. M 14 R System

15 0 B

16 y 0

t 03-04079-IR

17 1

18 n d 13 u C! N

14 d 700 a o a

15 County Ro The New Castle / Scottsburg Till Aquifer Subsystem is generally not very susceptible to surface

o

C E The Till Veneer / Dissected Till and Residuum Aquifer System is mapped along the western

R

C! 03-04472-IR contamination because aquifer units are overlain by thick till deposits. However, in a few places

03-00345-PS 0 y t ek 0 Hope edge of Bartholomew County and over most of the eastern third of the county. It has the most n e 6 overlying clay deposits are not present. These areas are considered at high risk to contamination. r ! C! C 03-03705-IR u C d limited groundwater resources of the unconsolidated aquifer systems. o h a 20 22 c ! C 23 24 03-02460-IR C o an 19 21 r 23 24 R B 22

Taylorsville 21 y dy 20 t ek Unconsolidated deposits of this aquifer system consist mostly of till with thin layers of stratified d 22 19 n Cre

u r u 21 23 lifty drift and, in some areas along the westernmost edge of the county, thin, eroded bedrock New Castle / Scottsburg Complex Aquifer System M 20 e 24 o C

v C 24 19 i ! residuum. Thickness of these sediments typically ranges from less than 5 feet where only 23 C 0 N 22 R County Road 60 residuum is present, to 50 feet where thick glacial till deposits have filled small bedrock valleys. Camp d 03-04252-IR C! 03-01003-IR o H o The New Castle / Scottsburg Complex Aquifer System is mapped in two small areas along the orse Schaefer w C t re Because this aquifer system is generally thin and not very productive, most drillers prefer to north-central edge of Bartholomew County. Complex multiple glacial advances resulted in a f e

i k nty Road 550 N 30 28 Lake 26 25 r 03-04121-IR Clifford Cou complete wells in the underlying bedrock aquifer. Approximately 88 percent of wells in the area sequence of multiple, stacked, till and outwash units that are quite variable in position and

D 27 26 29 Atterbury 26 C! 25 are completed in bedrock. However, a few wells have been completed in the unconsolidated thickness. The sand and gravel deposits vary from thin to massive and are typically d 28 27 30 29 27 25 R 28 unty Road 500 N deposits. Large diameter bucket type wells are commonly used to enhance yield from thin, discontinuous and overlain by a thick till. 29 r Co Creek 30 03-04316-IR r Lick a discontinuous silt, sand and gravel deposits. 26 25 C! 27 M k 03-03743-IR e This system is a southernmost extension from Shelby County and data are extremely limited in e C! r Total well depths are commonly 35 to 50 feet. Where present, thin sands and gravels are Bartholomew County. However, reported information from nearby Shelby County note that C 03-03193-IR 03-01420-IR 32 k 36 commonly less than 5 feet thick and typical wells yields are less than a few gallons per minute wells are typically completed at depths from 50 to 90 feet. Outwash aquifer deposits are C! Nortonburg County Road 450 N c 33 34 35 Military C! C! 03-01170-IR 31 u (gpm). Because of the low permeability of the surface materials, this aquifer system is not very commonly 10 to 20 feet thick. This system is capable of meeting the needs of domestic and high 36 D 03-03733-IR 32 ! 34 35 Hartsville 31 C 33 susceptible to contamination from surface sources. capacity users. Domestic well capacities are generally 10 to 20 gpm with static water levels 33 36 unty Road 450 N 34 from 12 to 35 feet below surface. Reported high capacity well yields from registered significant Co 35 03-03767-IR T. 10 N. 31 03-04186-IR 35 36 32 C! T. 9 N. groundwater withdrawal facilities in Shelby County range from 80 to 1000 gpm. 34 03-00509-MI E

C! Alluvial, Lacustrine, and Backwater Deposits Aquifer

0

C! d County Road 400 N 0

R 7 System

The New Castle / Scottsburg Complex Aquifer System is generally not susceptible to surface C! y Sloan Branch d

Reservation F e a

l 1 contamination where thick clays overlie aquifer deposits. However, in some areas outwash is o l 2 l 03-00345-PS 5

a 4

a 3 R

T. 10 N. 1 6 t T near the surface and clay deposits are thin. These areas are at moderate to high risk to

r y t The Alluvial, Lacustrine, and Backwater Deposits Aquifer System is made up of heterogeneous T. 9 N. o 4 C! 5 2 n 65 c 6 3 contamination. 1 u k ¨¦§ 03-01369-IN o bodies of alluvial, colluvial, and lacustrine materials within valley bottoms and terraces of some L

4 C o 3 R 5 we 2 larger streams tributary to the East Fork White River. 1 6 l i l v 2 R 3 d e r 03-03871-IR White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer C! Unconsolidated deposits within this system come from two sources. The first is alluvium 46 R deposited by streams along with colluvium eroded from valley walls and upland areas. The System 8 d S 11 12 R 9 10 second source is glaciolacustrine deposits formed in relatively stagnant lake water. The alluvial k d e County Road 250 N 12 7 n e la deposits are attributed to the White River valley becoming choked with outwash from receding r 9 un The White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer System is mapped along a wide north-south 7 10 11 S Newbern C 11 12 C 8 glaciers. The outwash deposits effectively dammed the tributary streams, thus creating lakes in at 10 w band across the central portion of Bartholomew County. This system contains large volumes of he 7 8 a which fine-grained glaciolacustrine deposits accumulated. rin H 12 e 9 C C outwash and alluvial deposits that filled the river valley of the East Fork White River. Thickness E C 10 11 r o o a e ek u u of unconsolidated deposits overlying bedrock can be as much as 130 feet within this system. s n 31 n

t t t ¤£ In Bartholomew County this system is mapped along portions of several tributaries to the East y y E

F Well depths are typically 40 to 70 feet. Aquifer materials include predominantly sand and gravel

R 0 N R 0 o ounty Road 20 Fork White River. These include: Clifty Creek in the east central portion of the county; the

C 0 o r o deposits that range from 5 to 125 feet thick but are more commonly from 35 to 65 feet thick. In Petersville a 14 1 k a 16 15 13 17 d d 1 in the north-central portion of the county; the south and east forks of White 18

S 13 some areas 5 to 10 feet of clay or silt overlie the aquifer materials. 8 14 d 3

5 a 15 a 2 Lick Creek in the southwest portion of the county; and the and Haw Creek to the 16 0 l o 5 17 t 03-00920-PS

13 E R

W 14 C 15 northeast of Columbus. 18 y This system has the greatest potential of any aquifer system in Bartholomew County and can r 16 C! County Road 100 N t

17 k n e 13 18 ree e 14 ty C u meet the needs of domestic and high-capacity users. Domestic well yields range from 5 to 35 f o k 15 Cli Columbus Total thickness of unconsolidated materials overlying bedrock in this system is commonly less Ott C gpm. There are 59 registered high-capacity facilities (117 wells) in this system. Reported well er C ree than 50 feet. In other counties where this system is mapped sand and gravel lenses, where capacities are up to 2400 gpm but are typically 300 to 1000 gpm. 100 N C! k County Road present, are typically less than 5 feet thick. However, in isolated areas of Bartholomew County 03-00638-IN 03-01349-IR ! 21 Baker Hollow Rd C 23 County Road 50 N 19 20 22 23 24 sand and gravel deposits can be up to 15 feet thick. Columbus 21 22 In areas that lack overlying clays, this aquifer system is highly susceptible to contamination from 24 19 20 surface sources. Where the aquifer system is overlain by clay or silt deposits, the aquifer is 23 24 22 This aquifer system is a limited resource and there are no known wells that actually produce moderately susceptible to surface contamination. 21 C! 20 from these deposits. Drillers commonly bypass the unconsolidated deposits in favor of the 19 e Line Rd

22 23 24 03-00781-IN Bas underlying bedrock aquifers. In many places large-diameter bored (bucket-rig) wells could E

03-01350-IR 0 produce adequate water from sands within the predominantly clay and silt materials of this SR 46 5 k White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer

C! 6 e SR 46 e

d aquifer system to satisfy domestic needs. r 25

a 28 27 26 Subsystem o C S 30 29 R R 26 25 d 1 7 28 y

03-02818-MI 29 27 t n This aquifer system is generally marked by thick surface deposits of soft silt and clay that have a

1 n

30 26 25 a C! u

S The White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer Subsystem includes areas adjacent and R low susceptibility to surface contamination. The susceptibility is greater in areas where the 27 C! o

e S C 100 S C! County Road l surficial silt and clay deposits are thin and directly overlie outwash deposits. parallel to the White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer System. The outwash subsystem 28 E t

30 25 29 03-01142-IN t i 27 26 03-00627-IN 0 typically occupies a higher topographic position than that of the outwash system and is marked

5

03-00664-IR L 2 by thinner outwash deposits that may be overlain by sandy clay, clay, or eolian-derived loess and

C! Garden d a 03-04360-IR o sand.

City R 36 33 34 35 New Castle / Scottsburg Till Aquifer System d ! y 32 R Op C t ek South os C! n 36 31 e su u 35 The White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer Subsystem is mapped along a small area in r m E 32 lfc C 03-00921-PS 31 o 34 Harrison Lake 36 a 33 o re C 9 the northwest part of the county along the west edge of the Driftwood River and along Clifty W ek s R T. 9 N. D 33 35 t S k 34 e F e The New Castle / Scottsburg Till Aquifer System are limited to two small areas of central Creek to the east of Columbus continuing north-northeast into Shelby County. n e T. 8 N.

i 32 o o d 200 S r South s E County Roa

r 34 36 31 Bartholomew County. The mapped deposits generally include a thick clay unit that caps outwash 35C C C k r 0

o E Bethany e 5 e Burnsville r deposits of variable thickness. Limited well data is available because only about 4 percent of all u W

7

k 5 a There are few wells available in the White River and Tributaries Outwash Aquifer Subsystem.

n 2 e

d

t

5 wells in the county completed in unconsolidated deposits are mapped in the New Castle / y a B

h Total thickness of unconsolidated deposits overlying bedrock ranges from 65 to 150 feet. The

o 2 d R i t 3 1 a R 4 Scottsburg Till Aquifer System. Well depths generally range from 50 to 125 feet. Thickness of o e thickness of aquifer materials within the unconsolidated deposits are typically between 5 and 45 T. 9 N. o 5

a 6 y R

t R

d E

2 T. 8 N. 4 n aquifer deposits range from 2 to 48 feet and are capped by clay ranging from 20 to 105 feet. feet. Well depths range from 30 to 105 feet below surface but are typically between 30 to 60 feet

i 5 y 7

v 0 u 1 6 3 t 1

5 0 o 2 e n 0 below surface. Many wells do not penetrate the full thickness of the aquifer system. r 3

3 u C

4

W o d ty Road 300 S The New Castle / Scottsburg Till Aquifer System is capable of supplying domestic and some

a oun

C C

1 5 o

6 R high capacity users. Domestic well yields range from 8 to 40 gpm with static water levels from 8

3 2 This aquifer system has the potential to meet the needs of domestic and some high-capacity y t to 58 feet below surface. There are no known registered significant water withdrawal facilities in C! n users. There are three registered significant water withdrawal facilities (4 wells) that report

ry Road 300 S u Grammer t o Coun 12 this county. This system is generally not very susceptible to surface contamination because the capacities of 180 gpm and 1000 gpm. Domestic well yields are typically from 10 to 30 gpm. 03-04230-IN C 10 11 9 outwash aquifers are overlain by thick till deposits. Static water levels are typically between 10 and 20 feet below surface.

C 12 Grandview 03-04408-IR 10 11 7 8 o C!

u 7 8 9 E

Lake n

t 11 0 Areas within this aquifer system that have overlying clay or silt deposits are moderately y 12

9 5

R 8 10 1 susceptible to surface contamination; whereas, areas that lack overlying clay or silt deposits are

o 11 7 d Road 400 S a ty 12 a Coun d Walesboro 10 Pike o highly susceptible to contamination.

lsville l R

Be 5

5

y S 0 t R

n W 7 u Co 16 14 13 o C! ok 15

C s 03-04417-IR 03-04247-IR 13 Cr 15 14 eek 18 17 ek C! re 13 18 17 16 Elizabethtown C SR 58 14 k oc 16 15 R 17 13 18 15 14 R. 7 E. R. 8 E.

Ogilville 03-04052-IR 23 24 22 31 Location Map County Road 550 S C! ¤£ 20 22 24 19 21 21 23 23 19 20 24 22 Waynesville Grouse ¨¦§65 Ridge County Road 600 S C! 03-01171-IR 26 25 28 27 29 26 30 28 27 25 29

30 E EXPLANATION 25

27 26 0

5 4

Registered Significant Ground-

County Road 700 S d C! a

W o

water Withdraw Well

0

R

0 35 36 34 y 1

03-02840-IR t

S n d 33

a u a 32 C! County Road

31 n o o 36 Azalia

d C M 35 R

34

o 33 y B u 32 t Lake

n n r t 31 03-01665-IR T. 8 N. State Roads & US Highways u a ® H

o Barbara n T. 7 N. 34 ea 35 36 C! C S c lt d County Road 800 h R 03-01639-IR h y y 1 C! R a 1 03-01724-IR r C! Interstate d Mount Sp C! R 850 S Healthy S 03-01638-IR County Road T. 8 N. 03-04420-IR 1 T. 7 N. 4 E C! 3 2 Stream

Lutheran 1 6 a 5 s

3 2 t

Lake 03-03871-IR F 4 F e 5 o Lake & River 1 6 r C! 1 0.5 0 1 Mile 3 2 g r 12 u k 8 s o 11 5 W C! U.S. Military Reservation

n

R h R 03-04240-IR Camp Atterbury S i d t e 10 R. 6 E. R. 7 E.

03-02976-IR 8 R i C! 9 v Waymansville e State Managed Property 12 7 r 10 11 E C! 03-00336-IN 1 0.5 0 1 Kilometer C 9 a 8 o st Jonesville

7 u 11 12 F Municipal Boundary n County Road 950 S o 10 t y r 15 W k

R W h o 03-02823-MI C! C! a i h t d e i t 03-01294-IR 4 C e 5 C! C

0 r S e 16 B r e W 03-01950-IR ym u e e 18 o c k e u k k 17 ek r R B 13 Cre d r 16 15 14 Fork a uth k n So e ch 17 15 re 14 13 18 C ck u B R. 5 E. R. 6 E.

R. 4 E. R. 5 E.

Map Use and Disclaimer Statement This map was created from several existing shapefiles. Township and Range Lines of Indiana Unconsolidated Aquifer Systems of Bartholomew County, Indiana (line shapefile, 20020621), Land Survey Lines of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621) and We request that the following agency be acknowledged in products derived County Boundaries of Indiana (polygon shapefile, 20020621), were from the Indiana Geological from this map: Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water. Survey and based on a 1:24,000 scale. Draft road shapefiles, System1 and System2 (line by Map generated by Jennifer K. Mc Millan and Joseph L. Phillips shapefiles, 2003), were from the Indiana Department of Transportation and based on a 1:24,000 IDNR, Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section This map was compiled by staff of the Indiana Department of Natural scale. Populated Areas in Indiana 2000 (polygon shapefile, 20021000) was from the U.S. Census Randal D. Maier Resources, Division of Water using data believed to be reasonably accurate. Bureau and based on a 1:100,000 scale. Streams27 (line shapefile, 20000420) was from the Division of Water, Resource Assessment Section However, a degree of error is inherent in all maps. This product is distributed Center for Advanced Applications in GIS at Purdue University. Managed Areas 96 (polygon “as is” without warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied. This map shapefile, various dates) was from IDNR. Unconsolidated Aquifer Systems coverage (Maier, is intended for use only at the published scale. 2004; modified 2011) was based on a 1:24,000 scale. December 2004