DOCSLIB.ORG

Cordaid-Final-Evaluation-Feb2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cordaid-Final-Evaluation-Feb2016 Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the cooperation and collaboration of a number of organisations and individuals. First and foremost, the consultant would like to thank the management of Retrak, staff and project managers in Addis Ababa and Hossana for their unreserved continuous facilitation and support, understanding and encouragement throughout the process, and reviewing the draft report. I would also like to acknowledge the willingness and commitment of the heads and representatives of the government offices in Hossana town and in Gibe, Duna and Soro Woredas who provided us with their evaluation of the project through individual and group interviews. I would also like to extend my appreciation to the members of the Self Help Groups and Child Wellbeing Clubs who participated in the focus group discussion sessions and provided us with their views regarding the project activities. Tilahun Girma Principal Consultant Abamela Business PLC, Development Consulting Firm Email: [email protected] Mobile: +251 930 01 30 75 The views expressed in this report are those of the consultant and do not necessarily reflect Retrak’s views nor those of the donor Cordaid. © Retrak, 2016 1 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 1 Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Purpose of final evaluation ..................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Limitations............................................................................................................................. 12 1.5 Organisation of the report .................................................................................................... 13 2 Findings: Drop-in centres and reintegration ................................................................................. 14 2.1 Activities and outputs ........................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Outcomes .............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................................... 18 2.4 Sustainability ......................................................................................................................... 20 3 Findings: Self Help Groups ............................................................................................................ 22 3.1 Activities and outputs ........................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Outcomes .............................................................................................................................. 22 3.3 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................................... 27 3.4 Sustainability ......................................................................................................................... 32 4 Findings: Child Wellbeing Clubs .................................................................................................... 34 4.1 Activities and outputs ........................................................................................................... 34 4.2 Outcomes .............................................................................................................................. 34 4.3 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................................... 34 4.4 Sustainability ......................................................................................................................... 36 5 Findings: Community Education ................................................................................................... 38 5.1 Activities and outputs ........................................................................................................... 38 5.2 Outcomes .............................................................................................................................. 38 5.3 Effectiveness ......................................................................................................................... 40 5.4 Sustainability ......................................................................................................................... 42 6 Conclusion and Recommendations .............................................................................................. 43 6.1 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 43 6.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 44 7 Appendices.................................................................................................................................... 46 7.1 Complete output results ....................................................................................................... 46 7.2 Complete outcome results .................................................................................................... 48 7.3 Most Significant Change Stories – final round of collection (October 2015)........................ 50 7.4 Most Significant Change Stories – first round of collection (September 2014).................... 54 7.5 FGD and KII Guides ................................................................................................................ 60 2 Acronyms CLA Cluster Level Associations CWC Child Wellbeing Club FGD Focus Group Discussion KII Key Informant Interview MSC Most Significant Change NGO Non-Governmental Organisation SHG Self Help group SNNPR Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region SOPs Standard Operating Procedures TVET Technical and Vocational Education and Training 3 Executive Summary Introduction Retrak has over two decades of experience of working with children on the streets in Africa and about one decade operational history in Ethiopia. Retrak Ethiopia works with children living full-time on the streets to give them a real alternative to life on the street. In 2012 Retrak’s records showed that a significant proportion of children met in Addis Ababa came from Ethiopia’s southern region (SNNPR) particularly from the town of Hossana and the surrounding areas. As a result, a plan was developed to address some of the push factors that were leading many children to come to the city. With support from Cordaid, a 3-year pilot community project was implemented (2012-2015). Adjustments to the project were subsequently made and a new drop-in centre in Hossana town was established to reach out to children before they arrive in the capital. The project objectives were outreach and service provision to children living unsupported on the streets; participation of children in education, psychosocial counselling and life skills at drop-in centres; and reintegration of children with their families in SNNPR and support to caregivers. Interventions were also established in vulnerable communities to enrol vulnerable women in Self Help Groups (SHGs) leading to greater economic security and participation in family and community decision making; establish child-led Child Wellbeing Clubs (CWCs) to raise awareness of child protection issues; and community education to promote child protection awareness and response. The goal of the final evaluation is to build on the mid-term review in order to assess achievements of the project, to guide decision-making on next steps for the project and to generate learning for informing similar projects in future. Methodology The final evaluation is based on ongoing monitoring data (child wellbeing assessments, economic household surveys, community child protection mapping, Most Significant Change stories and annual results reports), as well as primary data collection through specific tools such as focus group discussions with representatives from SHGs and CWCs and key informant interviews with selected government officials, religious and community leaders and other relevant stakeholders. The methodologies applied involved participation of beneficiaries in the evaluation process so as to hear feedback on the project services and outcomes directly from the project beneficiaries (both children and adults) and major stakeholders (government line offices). Findings
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ermias Bonkola
    St. MARY’S UNIVERSITY COLLEGE FACULTY OF BUSINESS DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF TRENDS OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF MISHA WOREDA, HADIYA ZONE, SNNPR, ETHIOPIA BY ERMIAS BONKOLA A SENIOR ESSAY PAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN MANAGEMENT MARCH 2013 SMUC St. MARY’S UNIVERSITY COLLEG FACULTY OF BUSINESS DEPARTEMENT OF MANAGEMENT This is to certify that the senor essay prepared by Ermias Bonkola: in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Management complies with the regulations of the University college and meets the accepted standards with respect to quality. APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE OF EXAMINERS Chair person Signature Advisor Signature Internal Examiner Signature External Examiner Signature Acknowledgement Above all, I thank Almighty God for always with me in all my endeavors and giving me endurance to complete my study. I am very glad to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to my advisor Tamirat Sulamo (M.A) for his invaluable guidance and constructive professional advises throughout my research. Especial thanks also to my family who were always by my side and who offered me financial, the material and moral support to complete this research work as well as may study. Moreover, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my best friend and staff members for their technical assistance and moral support in the due courses my research works and studies. Finally, I also grateful to surveyed government works and werada civil service department and data enumerators area are duly acknowledged for providing their willingness and valuable supports/cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision Etiopia
    FOOD SECURITY MONITORING REPORT OF NOVEMBER 1999 WORLD VISION ETIOPIA FOOD SECURITY MONITORING REPORT OF NOVEMBER 1999 Grants division February 2000 Addis Ababa FOOD SECURITY MONITORING REPORT OF NOVEMBER 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................6 II. SURVEY RESULT CLASSIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION ..............................................................7 III. TIGRAY REGIONAL STATE.........................................................................................................................8 3.1. ATSBI WOMBERTA AND TSEDA AMBA WOREDAS (KILTE AWLAELO ADP) ....................................................8 3.1.1. Back Ground ........................................................................................................................................8 3.1.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment.............................................................................................................8 3.1.3. Market Performance .............................................................................................................................8 3.1.4. Socio-Economic Conditions ..................................................................................................................9 3.1.5. Anthropometric Measurements..............................................................................................................9 IV. AMHARA REGIONAL STATE......................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    1. ORGANIZATIONAL BACKGROUND 1.1. Establishment / Organizational Aspiration: Love In Action Ethiopia/LIA-E/ is an indigenous, not-for-profit, non-governmental charitable organization established and registered in 2001 with the ministry of Justice and re-registered on October 30, 2009 with Charities and Societies Agency of Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia as an Ethiopian Residents Charity. Love In Action Ethiopia was established with a view to serving the poorest, underserved, most vulnerable, most at risk, and marginalized segments of the population; including children, youth and women. Over the years, LIAE has grown to serve its target beneficiaries through participatory development programs focusing on creating access to quality educations for children and adults; HIV/AIDS prevention, care and support; and capacity development. All through its periods of struggles, LIAE has grown beyond simply raising awareness and developing skills into rendering more sustainable and meaningful solutions for the multifaceted socio-economic problems of the community and in turn start to save life of the generation. 1.2. VISION: Love In Action Ethiopia aspires to see improved life in the rural (remote) and urban areas by the effort of the people themselves, and with the minimum external intervention. 1.3. MISSION: LIA Ethiopia is committed to bring sustainable change and transformation among the society through concerned effort of the community and genuine participation of all stakeholders. LIA Ethiopia, at its heart of activities promotes peoples’ awareness so as to enable them participate meaningfully and practically in the development processes of their locality, region and nation. 1.4. PROGRAM FOCUS: a. Education And Skills Development Program (ESDP): The key aspects which ESDP are focusing are: Creating Access to Education Improving Quality of Education Services Page 1 Increasing Educational Efficiency Ensuring Equity b.
    [Show full text]
  • WCBS III Supply Side Report 1
    Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Capacity Building in Collaboration with PSCAP Donors "Woreda and City Administrations Benchmarking Survey III” Supply Side Report Survey of Service Delivery Satisfaction Status Final Addis Ababa July, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The survey work was lead and coordinated by Berhanu Legesse (AFTPR, World Bank) and Ato Tesfaye Atire from Ministry of Capacity Building. The Supply side has been designed and analysis was produced by Dr. Alexander Wagner while the data was collected by Selam Development Consultants firm with quality control from Mr. Sebastian Jilke. The survey was sponsored through PSCAP’s multi‐donor trust fund facility financed by DFID and CIDA and managed by the World Bank. All stages of the survey work was evaluated and guided by a steering committee comprises of representatives from Ministry of Capacity Building, Central Statistical Agency, the World Bank, DFID, and CIDA. Large thanks are due to the Regional Bureaus of Capacity Building and all PSCAP executing agencies as well as PSCAP Support Project team in the World Bank and in the participating donors for their inputs in the Production of this analysis. Without them, it would have been impossible to produce. Table of Content 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key results by thematic areas............................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 Local government finance ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Administrative Map (August 2017)
    Ethiopia: Administrative map (August 2017) ERITREA National capital P Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Regional capital Gulomekeda Laelay Adiyabo Mereb Leke Ahferom Red Sea Humera Adigrat ! ! Dalul ! Adwa Ganta Afeshum Aksum Saesie Tsaedaemba Shire Indasilase ! Zonal Capital ! North West TigrayTahtay KoraroTahtay Maychew Eastern Tigray Kafta Humera Laelay Maychew Werei Leke TIGRAY Asgede Tsimbila Central Tigray Hawzen Medebay Zana Koneba Naeder Adet Berahile Region boundary Atsbi Wenberta Western Tigray Kelete Awelallo Welkait Kola Temben Tselemti Degua Temben Mekele Zone boundary Tanqua Abergele P Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Tsegede Tselemt Mekele Town Special Enderta Afdera Addi Arekay South East Ab Ala Tsegede Mirab Armacho Beyeda Woreda boundary Debark Erebti SUDAN Hintalo Wejirat Saharti Samre Tach Armacho Abergele Sanja ! Dabat Janamora Megale Bidu Alaje Sahla Addis Ababa Ziquala Maychew ! Wegera Metema Lay Armacho Wag Himra Endamehoni Raya Azebo North Gondar Gonder ! Sekota Teru Afar Chilga Southern Tigray Gonder City Adm. Yalo East Belesa Ofla West Belesa Kurri Dehana Dembia Gonder Zuria Alamata Gaz Gibla Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu ) Elidar Amhara Gelegu Quara ! Takusa Ebenat Gulina Bugna Awra Libo Kemkem Kobo Gidan Lasta Benishangul Gumuz North Wello AFAR Alfa Zone 1(Awsi Rasu) Debre Tabor Ewa ! Fogera Farta Lay Gayint Semera Meket Guba Lafto DPubti DJIBOUTI Jawi South Gondar Dire Dawa Semen Achefer East Esite Chifra Bahir Dar Wadla Delanta Habru Asayita P Tach Gayint ! Bahir Dar City Adm. Aysaita Guba AMHARA Dera Ambasel Debub Achefer Bahirdar Zuria Dawunt Worebabu Gambela Dangura West Esite Gulf of Aden Mecha Adaa'r Mile Pawe Special Simada Thehulederie Kutaber Dangila Yilmana Densa Afambo Mekdela Tenta Awi Dessie Bati Hulet Ej Enese ! Hareri Sayint Dessie City Adm.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Valuation of Soil Conservation in Highlands of Hadiya Zone of Ethiopia: the Case of Soro Woreda Ajacho Watershed
    Journal of Resources Development and Management www.iiste.org ISSN 2422-8397 An International Peer-reviewed Journal Vol.37, 2017 Economic Valuation of Soil Conservation in Highlands of Hadiya Zone of Ethiopia: The Case of Soro Woreda Ajacho Watershed Elias Erango Hadiya Zone Soil Conservation Bureau, Hadiya, Ethiopia Mekonnen Bersisa Department of Economics, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia Mekdes Shewangizaw Department of Economics, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia Tesfaye Etensa Department of Economics, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia Tadesse Tolera Department of Agricultural Economics, Wollega University, Shambu, Ethiopia Abstract This study was conducted to explore household’s willingness to pay for soil conservation practices in Soro Woreda Hadiya Zone Ethiopia. The objective of this study was, to investigate economic valuation of soil conservation in the Soro Woreda Ajacho watershed. The study employed double bounded dichotomous format of contingent valuation method was to elicit respondents’ WTP for improved soil conservation practices in terms of labor contribution. Data collated from 321 household heads was used for analysis. Both probit and bivariate model were estimated. Probit model was employed to assess the determinants of willingness to pay. Results of the model showed that family size of respondents, labour shortage, farm land size, education level of the household head and income positively and significantly affected the willingness to pay of the respondents while the level of bids negatively and significantly affected willingness to pay for soil conservation practices in the study area. The study also showed that the mean willingness to pay estimated from the Double Bounded Dichotomous Choice and open ended formats were computed at 137.81 and 78.82 person days per annum, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group
    DRMTechnical Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group Covering 1 Jan to 31 Dec 2016 Prepared by Clusters and NDRMC Introduction The El Niño global climactic event significantly affected the 2015 meher/summer rains on the heels of failed belg/ spring rains in 2015, driving food insecurity, malnutrition and serious water shortages in many parts of the country. The Government and humanitarian partners issued a joint 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document (HRD) in December 2015 requesting US$1.4 billion to assist 10.2 million people with food, health and nutrition, water, agriculture, shelter and non-food items, protection and emergency education responses. Following the delay and erratic performance of the belg/spring rains in 2016, a Prioritization Statement was issued in May 2016 with updated humanitarian requirements in nutrition (MAM), agriculture, shelter and non-food items and education.The Mid-Year Review of the HRD identified 9.7 million beneficiaries and updated the funding requirements to $1.2 billion. The 2016 HRD is 69 per cent funded, with contributions of $1.08 billion from international donors and the Government of Ethiopia (including carry-over resources from 2015). Under the leadership of the Government of Ethiopia delivery of life-saving and life- sustaining humanitarian assistance continues across the sectors. However, effective humanitarian response was challenged by shortage of resources, limited logistical capacities and associated delays, and weak real-time information management. This Periodic Monitoring Report (PMR) provides a summary of the cluster financial inputs against outputs and achievements against cluster objectives using secured funding since the launch of the 2016 HRD.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Chain Analysis of Agro-Forestry Products the Case of Fruit at Tembaro District, Kembata Tembaro Zone South Ethiopia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online) Vol.6, No.13, 2015 Market Chain Analysis of Agro-forestry Products The Case of Fruit at Tembaro District, Kembata Tembaro Zone South Ethiopia Nega Mateows 1* , Teshale WoldeAmanuel 2, Zebene Asfaw 2 1, Dilla University, college of Agriculture and Natural Resources P. O. Box 419 Dilla, Ethiopia 2, Hawassa University, Wondo Genet collage of Forestry and Natural Resources P. O. Box 128 Shashemene, Ethiopia Abstract Ethiopia has a variety of fruit crops grown in different agro ecological Zones by small farmers, mainly as a source of income as well as food. The nature of the product on one hand and the lack of market system on the other hand have resulted in low producers’ price and hence low benefit by the producers. This study was carried out to analyse the market chain of agroforestry products such as mango, avocado and banana. Two kebeles were selected based on the presence of fruit production. Data was collected from 140 mango, banana and avocado producing households, 7 local collectors and 13 retailers through structured interview, focus group discussion, key informant interviews, market assessment as well as field observation. Structure, Conduct and Performance (SCP) approach was used to analyze avocado, banana and mango market also OLS (Multiple linear regression model) was used to analyzed factors that determine banana, mango and avocado market supply of the producers in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Sustainable Latrine Use Through Human Behaviour Change and Local Capacity Development an Assessment of the District Approach in Ethiopia (A Case Study)
    Rethinking Sustainable Latrine Use through Human Behaviour Change and Local Capacity Development An Assessment of the District Approach in Ethiopia (A Case Study) By Addise Amado Dube A research project submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science in Water and Environmental Management Loughborough University MSc. © 2012 Addise Amado Dube September 2012 Supervisor: Dr Andrew Cotton BSc, PhD, CEng, MCIWEM Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC) School of Civil and Building Engineering Loughborough University Leicestershire, UK, LE11 3TU Tel: +44 (0) 1509 222885 Abstract Sustainable latrine use is the headline of sanitation discussions. Despite the efforts, progress lags behind its targets in developing countries. The aim of this study focuses on understanding key motivators of sanitation behaviour change, capacity development and intersectoral integration to advance sustainable use of latrines. A mixed methodological approach comprising of survey, interview, focus group discussion and observation is applied to collect evidences. However, research on sanitation behaviour change and capacity development is scanty and at lower stage compared to other health sectors such as on diabetics, HIV/AIDS, obesity or alcoholism. The existing literature indicates that human behaviour change is a crucial factor in achieving sanitation targets and it is vital to work in interdisciplinary manner to achieve such goals. Sociological and historical approaches to sanitation research can contribute immensely to reflect on social facts and lessons from the past and the current practices. This case study discovered that social factors that focus on awareness creation and education is a strong reason in motivating sustainable latrine use followed by emotional layers such as cleanliness and decency as important driving forces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Challenges of Potters and Tanners Among
    SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL Doı: http://dx.doi.org/10.31576/smryj.533 REVIEW ARTICLE SmartJournal 2020; 6(32):919-926 Arrival : 03/04/2020 Published : 16/06/2020 THE SOCIAL CHALLENGES OF POTTERS AND TANNERS AMONG THE YEM PEOPLE, SOUTHWEST ETHIOPIA Güney Batı Etiyopya'ndaki Yem Halkı Arasındaki Çömlekçi Ve Tabakçıların Toplumsal Zorlukları Reference: Yımer, N.A. (2020). “The Social Challenges Of Potters And Tanners Among The Yem People, Southwest Ethiopia”, International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, (Issn:2630-631X) 6(32): 919-926. Nigusu Adem YIMER PhD Candidate at the Department of History, Sakarya University, Sakarya/Turkey ORCID 0000-0002-4455-6137 ABSTRACT ÖZET In this short article it is intended to shade a new insight about Bu kısa makalede, Etiyopya'nın güneybatı kesimindeki Yem the social challenges of occupational groups (i.e, potter and halkı arasında meslek gruplarının (yani çömlekçi ve tabakçı) tanner) among the Yem people, in southwestern part of Ethiopia. sosyal zorlukları hakkında yeni bir içgörü gölgelemesi In the process of reconstructing the social challenges of potters amaçlanmıştır. Yem özel ilçesinde çömlekçi ve tabakçıların and tanners in Yem special district the author had visited the sosyal zorluklarını yeniden inşa etme sürecinde, yazar bölgeyi district twice, in 2013 and 2015. So, while undertaking the study 2013 ve 2015 yıllarında iki kez ziyaret etmişti. Bu nedenle, Yem on the dynamics of the social interactions among the Yem halkı arasındaki sosyal etkileşimlerin dinamikleri üzerine people, the author has examined both primary and secondary çalışma yaparken, yazar toplumdan gelen çömlekçi ve sources to figure out and reconstruct the social challenges that tabakçıların karşılaştığı sosyal zorlukları anlamak ve yeniden potter and tanner face from the community.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnic Group in Ethiopia
    Historical Research Letter www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3178 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0964 (Online) Vol.32, 2016 The Ancestral History and Traditional Administrative Structure of Hadiyya Society: An Ethnic Group in Ethiopia Ergogie Tesfaye Woldemeskel G. Jai Kishan Department of Anthropology, Andhra University Abstract Hadiyya is one of the ancient indigenous people in the southern part of Ethiopia, whose language is Hadiyyissaa. The ancient Hadiyya was one of the majority indigenous ethnic groups, which has a great history with strong earliest kingdom in Ethiopia. The current Hdiyya people are not the only indigenous people of the Hadiyya ethnic groups. Due to migration and massive movement within and outside the country, Hadiyyas were forced to live scattered in search of resources, peaceful place for their lives and foreign trade. As a result, they are assimilated with and sometimes overwhelmed by other ethnic groups. This article discusses different tribes of the indigenous Hadiyyas who came to the current place, Hadiyya Zone, in a scattered manner. According to the oral tradition and written documents, the ancient Hadiyya had its own strong Kingdom that helped to administer and rule the widely spread tribes of the ethnic group who had large territories in different parts of the country. The kingdom structure had also played a vital role in shaping the relationship of the Hadiyyas with other ethnic groups and with the outside world. During its kingdom, the head master or governor of Hadiyya used to be called ‘Adilla’ means ‘the King’. The current traditional administrative structure is also shaped in line with the ancient one.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: SNNP Region Administrative Map (As of 15 Aug 2017)
    Ethiopia: SNNP region administrative map (as of 15 Aug 2017) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suten ! ! ! ! ! ! Inge Sodo ! ! !Bui ! ! WelikiteKebena Abeshege ! Kokir Gedbano ! ! Kela ! ! Muhur Na Ak!lil ! Gubire ! ! ! Cheha Agena ! Imdibir! ! Ezha Me!skan ! ! Inseno ! Gonichire ! ! ! Kibet Qewaqoto! Koshe ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Enemorina Eaner Alicho Woriro ! Gumer Mareko ! Selti ! ! Areket Alkeso town ! ! ! ! ! ! Geta Kose Tora ! Fofa ! Werabe ! ! ! Dinkela ! ! Sayilem! ! ! ! ! Yadota Geja Endiguagn Yem SP Woreda ! Dalocha ! Misrak Azenet Berbere ! ! ! ! Misha !LERA Dalocha Masha ! Wilb!areg Gibe ! ! Mierab Azenet Berbere ! ! Lanfero ! Homec!ho ! ! Fonqo town ! Mito ! GAMBELA Gesha (Deka) Kondo GECHA TOWN ! Analemmo ! ! !Deka ! Doesha !Belesa town ! Alem Gebeya Anderacha Getawa Gembora ! ! Limu ! ! Bonosha Sankura ! ! ! Lisana town Jajira Shashogo Gimbichu! ! Hufa ! ! ! Diri Soro ! Gojeb Bita (Big) Gimbo Doya Gena Jacho A!nigach!a ! Alaba SP Woreda ! ! ! Daniboya Wishiwishi Dune Kulito ! Kaka Idget ! Bita Genet ! OROMIA Kelata Mudula Hobichaka ! ! Bonga ! ! ! ! ! Yeki ! Menjiwo ! Chena Tembaro Ke!diada Gambela TEPI TOWN Hadero !TubitoKacha Bira ! ! ! !Adilo Chda Idge T!unito ! Legend WACHA ! ! Terche Misrak Badawacho ! Gena Bosa Chiri BOMIBE 01 ! ! ! ! !Karewo ! Mierab Badawacho ! Ameya P ! Tocha Tocha Edget Boloso Bombe Sheka Tulo ! Regional capital ! Waka ! Semen Bench Alem Gena ! ! ! ! Mehal Sheko Mareka Boloso SoreDamot Pulasa Hawassa Zuria PWondo-Ge! net Gesa ! ! Shanito Hawasa Town ! ! ! ! Shama Chuko Shay Bench ! Bitena Town Mizan Aman ! ! Tula ! Damot
    [Show full text]