DOCSLIB.ORG

World Vision Etiopia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Vision Etiopia FOOD SECURITY MONITORING REPORT OF NOVEMBER 1999 WORLD VISION ETIOPIA FOOD SECURITY MONITORING REPORT OF NOVEMBER 1999 Grants division February 2000 Addis Ababa FOOD SECURITY MONITORING REPORT OF NOVEMBER 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................6 II. SURVEY RESULT CLASSIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION ..............................................................7 III. TIGRAY REGIONAL STATE.........................................................................................................................8 3.1. ATSBI WOMBERTA AND TSEDA AMBA WOREDAS (KILTE AWLAELO ADP) ....................................................8 3.1.1. Back Ground ........................................................................................................................................8 3.1.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment.............................................................................................................8 3.1.3. Market Performance .............................................................................................................................8 3.1.4. Socio-Economic Conditions ..................................................................................................................9 3.1.5. Anthropometric Measurements..............................................................................................................9 IV. AMHARA REGIONAL STATE......................................................................................................................9 4.1. ARTHUMA JILLE AND DAWA CHEFFA WOREDAS (KEMISSIE ADP) .................................................................9 4.1.1. Back Ground ........................................................................................................................................9 4.1.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment.............................................................................................................9 4.1.3. Market Performance ...........................................................................................................................10 4.1.4. Socio-Economic Conditions ................................................................................................................10 41.5. Anthropometric Measurement ..............................................................................................................10 4.2. ANTSOKIA-GEMZA WOREDA (ANTSOKIA-GEMZA ADP)..............................................................................11 4.2.1. Background ........................................................................................................................................11 4.2.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment...........................................................................................................11 4.2.3. Market Performance ...........................................................................................................................11 4.2.4. Socio-Economic Conditions ................................................................................................................12 4.2.5. Anthropometric Measurement .............................................................................................................12 4.3. MEHAL MEDA ADP (GERA KEYA WOREDA)...............................................................................................12 4.3.1. Back Ground ......................................................................................................................................12 4.3.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment...........................................................................................................12 4.3.3. Market Performance ...........................................................................................................................13 4.3.4. Socio-Economic Conditions ................................................................................................................13 4.3.5. Anthropometric Measurements............................................................................................................13 4.4. TENTA WOREDA (AJIBAR ADP) ..................................................................................................................14 4.4.1. Background ........................................................................................................................................14 4.4.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment...........................................................................................................14 4.4.3. Market performance ...........................................................................................................................14 4.4.4. Socio-Economic Conditions ................................................................................................................15 4.4.5. Anthropometric Measurement .............................................................................................................15 V. OROMIYA REGIONAL STATE....................................................................................................................15 5.1. ADAMA AND BOSSET WOREDAS (ADAMA ADP)..........................................................................................15 5.1.1. Background ........................................................................................................................................15 5.1.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment...........................................................................................................16 5.1.3. Market Performance ...........................................................................................................................16 5.1.4. Socio-Economic Conditions ................................................................................................................17 5.1.5. Anthropometric Measurement .............................................................................................................17 5.2. TIYA ADP (KERSA KONDALTITI WOREDA).................................................................................................17 5.2.1. Background ........................................................................................................................................17 5.2.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment...........................................................................................................18 5.2.3. Market Performance ...........................................................................................................................18 5.2.4. Socio - Economic Conditions ..............................................................................................................18 5.2.5. Anthropometric Measurement .............................................................................................................19 VI. SOUTH NATIONS NATIONALITIES AND PEOPLES STATE(SNNPS).....................................................19 BADAWACHO WOREDA (SHONE ADP).........................................................................................................19 6.1.1. Background ........................................................................................................................................19 6.1.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment...........................................................................................................19 6.1.3. Market performance ...........................................................................................................................20 FOOD SECURITY MONITORING REPORT OF NOVEMBER 1999 6.1.4. Socio-Economic Conditions ................................................................................................................20 6.1.5. Anthropometric Measurements............................................................................................................21 6.2. SHENKOLLA ADP (SORO WOREDA)............................................................................................................21 6.2.1. Background ........................................................................................................................................21 6.2.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment...........................................................................................................21 6.2.3. Market performance ...........................................................................................................................21 6.2.4. Socio-Economic Conditions ................................................................................................................22 6.2.5. Anthropometric Measurements............................................................................................................22 6.3. HUMBO WOREDA (DAMOTA ADP) .............................................................................................................22 6.3.1. Background ........................................................................................................................................23 6.3.2. Crop and Livestock Assessment...........................................................................................................23 6.3.3. Market performance ...........................................................................................................................23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision Ethiopia Early Warning Unit Grants Division
    WORLD VISION ETHIOPIA EARLY WARNING UNIT GRANTS DIVISION RAPID NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT CONDUCTED IN FIVE DISTRICTS. (February 2000) Tenta South Wollo (Adjibar) Gera Keya North Shoa (Mehal Meda) Sodo zuria North omo (Damota) Humbo North omo (Damota) Tseda amba E. Tigray (Kilte Awlaelo) April 2000 Addis Ababa 1 1. Summary A rapid nutritional assessment was conducted in five districts of World Vision Ethiopia operational areas during February 2000. The objective of the In Gera keya district, it was reported that assessment was to monitor the status of two people died and 102 were sick of acute malnutrition (wasting) in the typhoid fever. As copping mechanism districts, which had high prevalence of farmers sold live animals, migrated to malnutrition during the November 1999, adjacent areas in search of food, sold survey. The districts are located in their labor, reduced frequency, quality Tigray region (Tseda amba), Amhara and quantity of their meals, and (Gera keya and Tenta) and Southern consumed less preferred foods. regional state (Humbo and Sodo zuria). 2. Methodology The assessment result reveals that the highest wasting level was observed in The sampling size was determined using Tseda Amba district 22.2%, Tenta the sampling formula (see Annex 1). 21.5%, Sodo zuria 16.7%, Gera keya Every Peasant Association was included 13.6% and Humbo 9.6%. in to the sample by randomly selected sub Peasant Associations (50% of sub Land preparation for short cycle crop has Peasant Associations). In each district not been started because the onset of over 700 children were weighed and short rain is distorted and is late by over measured using sub Peasant Associations eight weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Gamo: Linguists’ Classification Versus Self Identification of the Community
    Vol. 5(9), pp. 373-380, December, 2013 DOI: 10.5897/IJSA2013.0471 International Journal of Sociology and ISSN 2006- 988x © 2013 Academic Journals Anthropology http://www.academicjournals.org/IJSA Full Length Research Paper Revisiting Gamo: Linguists’ classification versus self identification of the community Hirut Woldemariam Department of Linguistics, Institute of Language Studies, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Accepted 17 September, 2013 This study attempts to contribute to our knowledge about Gamo, a member of the North Ometo subgroup, which is one of the four subgroups that constitute the Ometo group of the Omotic language family (Fleming, 1976; Bender, 2000). This paper characterizes some of the issues in the research of language and identity. It will attempt to employ the complementary perspectives of sameness and difference between Gamo, its sisters in the North Ometo sub-branch and its dialects. North Ometo comprises of several related languages and dialects of which Gamo is one. The exact relationship amongst the Ometo languages is not well known. Not equally well known is the relationship Gamo has with its sisters and daughters. The study tries to address issues concerning with misrepresentation of the Gamo language by the existing classification in one hand and what the self perception of the Gamo community likes on the other hand. This study aimed at examining linguistic facts and the Gamo speakers’ own understandings of their identities. To this end, the study has used linguistic, anthropological and sociolinguists attempt to characterize membership of Gamo based on linguistic facts and members’ self ethno-linguistic identificationi.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Length Research Article DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
    Available online at http://www.journalijdr.com International Journal of DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ISSN: 2230-9926 International Journal of Development Research Vol. 07, Issue, 01, pp.11119-11130, January, 2017 Full Length Research Article DETERMINANTS OF RURAL HOUSEHOLDS’ VULNERABILITY TO POVERTY IN CHENCHA AND ABAYA DISTRICTS, SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA *Fassil Eshetu Abebe Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Arba Minch University ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: This study primarily aimed to examine the determinants of rural households’ vulnerability to Received 27th October, 2016 poverty and to profile the households according to their level of vulnerability using Feasible Received in revised form Generalized Least Square (FGLS) and Logistic Regression analysis with the help of data collected 28th November, 2016 from a sample of 500 households in two Woredas. The general poverty line of the study area was Accepted 14th December, 2016 determined to be Birr 248 per month per adult equivalent and 29.8 percent of the population in the th Published online 30 January, 2017 study areas were found to be poor. The projected consumption percapita after the three step FGLS estimation revealed that, the incidence of vulnerability to poverty in the area was 34.2 percent and Key Words: therefore, vulnerability was more spread in the study areas than ex post poverty. Using the two Poverty, Vulnerability, vulnerability thresholds, observed poverty rate (0.298) and vulnerability of 0.5, about 28.6%, Feasible Generalized Least Square, 5.6% and 65.8% of households were highly vulnerable, low vulnerable and not vulnerable Logit Model and Ethiopia. respectively. Most importantly, from the total poor households about 81.75%, 3.25% and 15% were highly vulnerable, low vulnerable and not vulnerable respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Ermias Bonkola
    St. MARY’S UNIVERSITY COLLEGE FACULTY OF BUSINESS DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF TRENDS OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF MISHA WOREDA, HADIYA ZONE, SNNPR, ETHIOPIA BY ERMIAS BONKOLA A SENIOR ESSAY PAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN MANAGEMENT MARCH 2013 SMUC St. MARY’S UNIVERSITY COLLEG FACULTY OF BUSINESS DEPARTEMENT OF MANAGEMENT This is to certify that the senor essay prepared by Ermias Bonkola: in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Management complies with the regulations of the University college and meets the accepted standards with respect to quality. APPROVED BY THE COMMITTEE OF EXAMINERS Chair person Signature Advisor Signature Internal Examiner Signature External Examiner Signature Acknowledgement Above all, I thank Almighty God for always with me in all my endeavors and giving me endurance to complete my study. I am very glad to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to my advisor Tamirat Sulamo (M.A) for his invaluable guidance and constructive professional advises throughout my research. Especial thanks also to my family who were always by my side and who offered me financial, the material and moral support to complete this research work as well as may study. Moreover, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my best friend and staff members for their technical assistance and moral support in the due courses my research works and studies. Finally, I also grateful to surveyed government works and werada civil service department and data enumerators area are duly acknowledged for providing their willingness and valuable supports/cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Patterns and Its Implication for Climate Change: the Case of Gamo Gofa, Southern Ethiopia
    Defaru Debebe. et al., IJSRR 2013, 2(3), 155-173 Research article Available online www.ijsrr.org ISSN: 2279–0543 International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews Land Use Patterns and its Implication for Climate Change: The Case of Gamo Gofa, Southern Ethiopia Defaru Debebe* and Tuma Ayele Arba Minch University P.O.Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia ABSTRACT Land is one of three major factors of production in classical economics (along with labor and capital) and an essential input for housing and crop production. Land use is the backbone of agriculture and it provides substantial economic and social benefits. Assessing past-to present land use patterns associated with the crop production helps to understand which climatic effects might arise due to expanding crop cultivation. This study was conducted to evaluate the land use pattern and its implication for climate change in Gamo Gofa, Southern Ethiopia. For evaluation, correlation and time series trend analysis were used. Results revealed that a significant reduction in cultivable land, which was converted into cropland and might increase deforestation and greenhouse gas emission, in turn induce climate change. The correlation between cropland and fertile (cultivable) land (r=0.22674) in 2005 improved to (r=0.75734) in 2012 indicating major shift of fertile land to cropland in seven years interval. On other side, twelve years (1987-1999 and 2000-2011) average maximum temperature difference in Gamo Gafa was increased 0.425oC with standard deviation 0.331. It is statistically significant (t =1.284, alpha=0.10) at 10% level of error. Moreover, the spatial differences in climate change are likely to imply a heterogeneous pattern of land use responses.
    [Show full text]
  • FS-IAP Project in Oromia and SNNPR Regions
    EUROPEAN UNION FS-IAP Project in Oromia and SNNP Regions Baseline Survey Report (Final Report) Submitted to: CARE Ethiopia By: TENTAM Development Training and Consulting Services PLC i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... i List of tables ...................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................... ii List of Equations ............................................................................................................................................... ii Acronyms and Explanatory notes .................................................................................................................... iii Explanatory Note ............................................................................................................................................. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Knowledge, Attitude and Awareness of Farmers in Chencha Woreda, Gamo Gofa Zone, South Ethiopia
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 7, Issue 1, January 2017 69 ISSN 2250-3153 Environmental Knowledge, Attitude and Awareness of Farmers in Chencha Woreda, Gamo Gofa Zone, South Ethiopia Mohammed Seid Adem Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Arba Minch University, P O BOX: 21 Abstract- In different parts of Ethiopia, even though many Currently, ED in Ethiopia has long been severe threat and studies have been conducted on environment and management of tribulation that, ranging from very severe in rural areas to severe natural resources, the environmental literacy level of farmers is in urban areas [4]. ED refers to the temporary or permanent loss not utterly studied and analyzed. Therefore, this study was of natural resources as the result of human activities that designed to assess the environmental knowledge, attitude and impeding the capacity to contribute for food security, climate awareness of farmers at Chencha Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. adaptation, fuel wood consumption, and other ecosystem Stratified and systematic samplings were applied to select target benefits. population. The primary data were gathered from 330 household Ethiopian has been facing rapid and exhaustive degradation heads by using standardized questionnaire. The analysis was of forest and soil resources. The rapid population growth; undertaken by using quantitative methods [ANOVA, Tukey test, increased crop cultivation in marginal areas and increased eta square, and T-test]. The study revealed that, nearly 50% of livestock grazing pressure; poor agricultural practices have the respondents had medium level of environmental knowledge resulted in exhaustive forest and soil degradation [5, 4]. Many and awareness level. The statistical analysis displayed that educat studies have shown that deforestation is undoubtedly has ional status, age, & information accessibility had statistically sign increased from time to time and has occurred in the remaining ificant influence on environmental knowledge, attitude and forested areas of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    1. ORGANIZATIONAL BACKGROUND 1.1. Establishment / Organizational Aspiration: Love In Action Ethiopia/LIA-E/ is an indigenous, not-for-profit, non-governmental charitable organization established and registered in 2001 with the ministry of Justice and re-registered on October 30, 2009 with Charities and Societies Agency of Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia as an Ethiopian Residents Charity. Love In Action Ethiopia was established with a view to serving the poorest, underserved, most vulnerable, most at risk, and marginalized segments of the population; including children, youth and women. Over the years, LIAE has grown to serve its target beneficiaries through participatory development programs focusing on creating access to quality educations for children and adults; HIV/AIDS prevention, care and support; and capacity development. All through its periods of struggles, LIAE has grown beyond simply raising awareness and developing skills into rendering more sustainable and meaningful solutions for the multifaceted socio-economic problems of the community and in turn start to save life of the generation. 1.2. VISION: Love In Action Ethiopia aspires to see improved life in the rural (remote) and urban areas by the effort of the people themselves, and with the minimum external intervention. 1.3. MISSION: LIA Ethiopia is committed to bring sustainable change and transformation among the society through concerned effort of the community and genuine participation of all stakeholders. LIA Ethiopia, at its heart of activities promotes peoples’ awareness so as to enable them participate meaningfully and practically in the development processes of their locality, region and nation. 1.4. PROGRAM FOCUS: a. Education And Skills Development Program (ESDP): The key aspects which ESDP are focusing are: Creating Access to Education Improving Quality of Education Services Page 1 Increasing Educational Efficiency Ensuring Equity b.
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision Ethiopia Grants Division, Early Warning Unit
    WORLD VISION ETHIOPIA GRANTS DIVISION, EARLY WARNING UNIT FOOD SECURITY MONITORING REPORT OF MAY 2000 Rainfall, crop and livestock conditions Market prices situations Socio-economic conditions Nutrition and human health July 2000 Addis Ababa ACRONYMS ADPs Area Development Programs Belg Short rainy season from February to April BOA Bureau of Agriculture BOH Bureau of Health Kolla Ecological zones less than 1500 m.a.s.l. Weina-Dega Ecological zone varying from 1500 to 2500 m.a.s.l. Dega Ecological zone varying from 2500 to 3500 m.a.s.l. DPPC Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Commission EPI-INFO Epidemiological Information- Computer program used for anthropometric data analysis FFW Food For Work m.a.s.l. Meter Above Sea Level Meher Long rainy season from June to September Normal Long-term average PAs Peasant Associations Quintal Local measurement equivalent to 100 kg WAZ Weight for height Z score (indices) used to calculate acute and chronic malnutrition WHZ Height for age Z Score (indices) used to calculate chronic malnutrition WHZ Weight for height Z score (indices) used to calculate acute malnutrition Woreda Administrative area similar to district WVE World Vision Ethiopia Z-Score Indices used to calculate Weight for height, weight for age and height for age. Global Acute malnutrition Wasting (Height for weight below –2SD) ADPs with their respective Regions, Zones districts and distance from Addis Ababa Distance Project from Addis S. No. Sites Region Zone Woredas/districts Ababa (Km)* 1. Adama Oromia East Showa Adama and Boset 118 2. Adjibar Amhara South Wollo Tenta 523 3. Antsokia I Amhara North Showa Antsokia Gemza 350 Antsokia Arthume Jile & Dawa 4.
    [Show full text]
  • View/Open (2MB)
    Aklilu Dalelo/Till Stellmacher Faith-based Organisations in Ethiopia The Contribution of the Kale Heywet Church to Rural Schooling, Ecological Balance and Food Security With 22 figures V&R unipress Bonn University Press Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. ISBN 978-3-8471-0011-9 ISBN 978-3-8470-0011-2 (E-Book) Publications of Bonn University Press are published by V&R unipress GmbH. This book was published with financial support from the Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst e.V. Copyright2012byV&Runipress GmbH, D-37079 Goettingen All rights reserved, including those of translation into foreign languages. No part of this work may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilm and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printing and binding: CPI Buch Bücher.de GmbH, Birkach Printed in Germany. Inhalt Acknowledgements . .................. 9 About the authors . .................. 11 List of Tables . ............................... 13 List of Figures . ............................... 15 List of Acronyms ............................... 17 1. Introduction . ............................... 19 1.1. Faith-based Organizations and the Genesis of Modern Education . 19 1.2. Why Ecological Balance? . .................. 20 1.3. Why Concern about Food Security? . ........ 23 1.4. Rationale and Objectives of the Study . ........ 27 1.5. Methodology . .................. 27 1.6. Organisation of the Research Report . ........ 30 2. Ethiopia: Biophysical and Socio-economic Conditions . ........ 31 2.1. The Biophysical Environment . .................. 31 2.2. Socio-economic Environment . .................. 32 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Demography and Health
    SNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna, July 2014 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org 2 SNNPR is one of the largest regions in Ethiopia, accounting for more than 10 percent of the country’s land area [1]. The mid-2008 population is estimated at nearly 16,000,000; almost a fifth of the country’s population. With less than one in tenth of its population (8.9%) living in urban areas in 2008 the region is overwhelmingly rural. "The region is divided into 13 administrative zones, 133 Woredas and 3512 Kebeles, and its capital is Awassa." [1] "The SNNPR is an extremely ethnically diverse region of Ethiopia, inhabited by more than 80 ethnic groups, of which over 45 (or 56 percent) are indigenous to the region (CSA 1996). These ethnic groups are distinguished by different languages, cultures, and socioeconomic organizations. Although none of the indigenous ethnic groups dominates the ethnic makeup of the national population, there is a considerable ethnic imbalance within the region. The largest ethnic groups in the SNNPR are the Sidama (17.6 percent), Wolayta (11.7 percent), Gurage (8.8 percent), Hadiya (8.4 percent), Selite (7.1 percent), Gamo (6.7 percent), Keffa (5.3 percent), Gedeo (4.4 percent), and Kembata (4.3 percent) …. While the Sidama are the largest ethnic group in the region, each ethnic group is numerically dominant in its respective administrative zone, and there are large minority ethnic groups in each zone. The languages spoken in the SNNPR can be classified into four linguistic families: Cushitic, Nilotic, Omotic, and Semitic.
    [Show full text]