DOCSLIB.ORG

40 Cpmr General Assembly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
40 Cpmr General Assembly CONFÉRENCE DES RÉGIONS PÉRIPHÉRIQUES MARITIMES D’EUROPE CONFERENCE OF PERIPHERAL MARITIME REGIONS OF EUROPE 6, rue Saint-Martin - 35700 RENNES (France) Tél.: + 33 (0)2 99 35 40 50 - Fax: + 33 (0)2 99 35 09 19 E.mail: [email protected] – Web: www.crpm.org C1 40 th CPMR GENERAL ASSEMBLY 4-5 October 2012 Białystok (Podlaskie, Poland) The Peripheral Maritime Regions listed below met for their 40th CPMR Annual General Assembly in Białystok (Podlaskie, Poland) on 4 and 5 October 2012. ABERDEEN CITY (UK), ABERDEENSHIRE (UK), AÇORES (PT), ANATOLIKI MAKEDONIA THRAKI (GR), ANDALUCIA (ES), AQUITAINE (FR), ARGYLL & BUTE (UK), ASTURIAS (ES), BALEARES (ES), BASSE- NORMANDIE (FR), BORDER, MIDLAND AND WESTERN REGIONAL ASSEMBLY (IE), BORNHOLM (DK), BRETAGNE (FR), BUSKERUD (NO), CALARASI (RO), CANTABRIA (ES), CATALUNYA (ES), COMUNITAT VALENCIANA (ES), CORNWALL (UK), DEVON& SOMERSET (UK), DYTIKI ELLADA (GR), EDIRNE (TR), CYPRUS (D ISTRICT AUTHORITIES ), FRIULI-VENEZIA-GIULIA (IT), GÄVLEBORG (SE), GOTLAND (SE), GOZO (M ALTA ), GUADELOUPE (FR), HALLAND (SE), HELSINKI-UUSIMAA (FI), HIGHLAND (UK), HORDALAND (NO), IDA-VIRUMAA & PÄRNUMAA (EE), IONIA NISIA (GR), KIRKLARELI (TR), KRITI (GR), KUJAWSKO-POMORSKIE* (PL), KYMENLAAKSO (FI), LA REUNION (FR), LANGUEDOC-ROUSSILLON (FR), MADEIRA (PT), MAYOTTE (FR), MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN (DE), MIDTJYLLAND (DK), MONASTIR (TN), MØRE OG ROMSDAL (NO), MURCIA (ES), NAVARRA (ES), NOORD-HOLLAND (NL), NOORD-NEDERLAND (NL), NORRBOTTEN (SE), NORDJYLLAND (DK), NORDLAND (NO), NORD-PAS-DE-CALAIS (FR), NOTIO AIGAIO (GR), ODESSA (U KRAINE ), ÖREBRO (SE), OSTROBOTHNIA (FI), PÄIJÄT-HÄME (FI), PAÍS VASCO (ES), PAYS DE LA LOIRE (FR), PELOPONNISOS (GR), PODLASKIE (PL), POITOU-CHARENTES (FR), PROVENCE-ALPES-CÔTE D'AZUR (FR), ROGALAND (NO), SARDEGNA (IT), SKÅNE (SE), SICILIA (IT), SINOP (TR), SOGN OG FJORDANE (NO), SOUTH-WEST FINLAND (FI), STOCKHOLM (SE), TAMPERE* (FI), TELEMARK (NO), TOSCANA (IT), TROMS (NO), TULCEA (RO), VARNA (BG), VÄSTERBOTTEN (SE), VÄSTERNORRLAND (SE), VÄSTRA GÖTALAND (SE), VEST-AGDER (NO), VESTFOLD (NO), WALES (UK), WIELKOPOLSKA* (PL), ZUID-HOLLAND (NL). (*) Observer On behalf of the Regions attending the General Assembly, the President of the CPMR, Jean-Yves Le Drian, wishes to warmly thank the Region of Podlaskie and its Marshal, Jarosław Dworzański, for kindly organising and hosting the event. He extends his thanks to the national and regional authorities and EU institutions who took part in the proceedings of the Conference. President Le Drian would especially like to thank the Cypriot government in its capacity as EU Presidency in office for its participation in the General Assembly 40th CPMR General Assembly, 4 and 5 October 2012 Białystok (Podlaskie, Poland) p. 1 Final Declaration and Resolutions On behalf of its 158 members, the Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions, gathered for its 40th Annual General Assembly in Białystok, adopted the following Final Declaration and Resolutions: CONTENTS FINAL DECLARATION AND RESOLUTIONS I. Final Declaration Attached II. Resolutions : Attached II.1 – The establishment of a European Fisheries Technology Centre (EFTC) (Resolution presented by the CPMR North Sea Commission Marine Resources Group) II.2 - The CPMR is calling for the rapid launch of the Adriatic-Ionian macroregion (Resolution presented by the CPMR Balkan and Black Sea Regional Commission and Inter-Mediterranean Commission) II.3 - A Platform on Tourism (Resolution presented by the CPMR North Sea Commission) II.4 - Towards a European policy for maritime and coastal tourism (Resolution presented by the CPMR Inter-Mediterranean Commission and supported by the CPMR Balkan and Black Sea Regional Commission) 40th CPMR General Assembly, 4 and 5 October 2012 Białystok (Podlaskie, Poland) p. 2 Final Declaration and Resolutions ≈ I ≈ FINAL DECLARATION EUROPE’S PERIPHERIES AT THE CENTRE OF A LASTING DEEP ECONOMIC CRISIS 1. As in previous years since 2008, 2012 has been an extremely tough year for the peripheral maritime Regions of Europe, especially the Mediterranean, Irish and Portuguese Regions hard-hit by the global economic recession. Alongside the massive efforts being asked of the people of Europe, in particular from the regions in greatest difficulty, the prospects for overcoming the crisis are for the moment unfortunately still slim. A huge challenge still lies ahead of the European Union, whose future and such major achievements as the Euro are being put to the test. 2. At the same time, the south and east of the Mediterranean are still experiencing continued upheavals. The stakes involved in supporting these democratic revolutions remain high for the European Union. 3. In this context, the serious difficulties faced by peripheral maritime Regions must be balanced against their economic, cultural and geopolitical assets. These advantages make them promising territories for the future in terms of generating growth throughout the European continent, as long as the EU provides itself with the means to implement ambitious policies targeted towards them. It is from this perspective - which also includes the potential they represent for the development of the European Union - that the peripheral maritime Regions gathered under the umbrella of the CPMR voice their views at the General Assembly in Bialystok (Podlaskie, Poland). The messages they convey echo the CPMR’s core political identity centred on cohesion, maritime dimension and accessibility. CONFRONTING THE CRISIS BY REASSERTING THE NEED FOR EUROPE AND SOLIDARITY BETWEEN TERRITORIES 4. The ongoing efforts by Member States to implement effective European economic governance in response to the crisis remain keen, crucial and encouraging. The CPMR strongly supports recent steps forward, especially with regard to the European Stability Mechanism, the agreement on the “growth package” reached in June 2012, notice of the opportunity for the ECB to buy back sovereign debts, and the initial guidelines put forward on the banking union. 5. Nonetheless, the political equilibrium between Member States remains shaky. Further to the political process initiated at the Political Bureau in June 2011 and the political seminar on solidarity held in February 2012, the CPMR Member Regions reaffirm their deep commitment to the above principles. 6. In this context, the CPMR Member Regions, which themselves are conducting drastic budget control policies while making investments for the future and policies to support their populations, reaffirm their commitment to deepening the European Union. They urge the European institutions to continue to move towards common solutions. They also call on the EU Member States to convey loud and clear the principles of solidarity and European political unity. THE PERIPHERAL REGIONS EXPRESS DEEP CONCERNS ABOUT THE EUROPEAN BUDGET 7. The peripheral maritime Regions recall - as they did at their General Assembly in September 2011 in Aarhus (DK) - the need to find the right balance between budget cuts and support for investments and people. This implies, alongside efforts led by the Regions and States, empowering the EU to support the delivery of the EU2020 Strategy through a strong capacity for investment. 40th CPMR General Assembly, 4 and 5 October 2012 Białystok (Podlaskie, Poland) p. 3 Final Declaration and Resolutions 8. On the whole, the European Commission’s initial proposals on the Multiannual Financial Framework represent an encouraging and coherent prospect. The European Parliament’s evaluation of the EU budget also confirms its potential as an investment budget. At the same time, the CPMR maintains that a reform of the own resources system is necessary, as is budget flexibility between financial years, in order to avoid national interests prevailing over European interests. 9. Negotiations on the Multiannual Financial Framework seem however to be taking an extremely worrying turn. By restating the desire of a growing number of Member States to reduce the EU budget, and putting forward a set of inconsistent budget cutting scenarios, the informal Council of 30 August 2012 expressed guidelines that run counter to the needs of the current economic climate. If this trend continues, the EU2020 strategy, which was nevertheless adopted by these same Member States and the European Parliament, would result in a resounding failure. 10. The CPMR is alarmed at any temptation to reduce the budget for growth and job creation that the EU budget represents, under the pretext of short term savings that would jeopardise long term investments. It asks the Member States and the European Parliament to take a forward-looking view, by supporting the European Commission’s proposals on the budget for European policies after 2014, and in particular for cohesion policy, maritime policy and policies in support of accessibility, as well as all EU policies with a strong territorial impact cited in the present text. THOUGH AN ESSENTIAL RESULT OF GROWTH, COHESION HAS BEEN PUT ON HOLD ••• Coherent and realistic objectives and governance for cohesion policy 11. The CPMR welcomes the European Commission proposals for a Cohesion Policy package post-2013 and expresses its satisfaction with the good number of CPMR proposal included in the package, such as the emphasis on partnership, simplification and involvement of Regions in the Partnership Contract. 12. The CPMR also welcomes the general support alluded to the need to coordinate European funding instruments further through the Common Strategic Framework (CSF), and asks for a balanced legislative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Participants List
    NORTH SEA CONFERENCE 2016 15-17 JUNE 2016, Billund, Denmark PARTICIPANTS LIST First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Adrian Mass Allianz für die Region GmbH, Germany [email protected] Growing into Industry 4.0 Albert Ruiter Province of Fryslan The Netherlands a.ruiter"fryslan.nl Anders Laustsen CenSec Denmark [email protected] Andrea Wiencke Allianz für die Region GmbH, Germany [email protected] Growing into Industry 4.0 Andreas Lervik Østfold County Council Norway [email protected] Anja Domnick Common Wadden Sea Secretariat, Germany [email protected] Prowad Link Anja Dalsgaard Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Anke Spoorendonk Ministry of European Affairs Schleswig-Holstein Germany [email protected] Ann Irene Saeternes Eastern Norway County Network Norway [email protected] Anna Maria Sønderholm Væksthus Midtjylland Denmark [email protected] 1 First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country Email Anne Udd Region Halland Sweden [email protected] Ann-Sofie Pauwelyn Waterwegen & Zeekanaal NV Flanders [email protected] Arjen Rodenburg PNO Consultants, CONBIKE and IoTLogistics The Netherlands [email protected] Axel Kristiansen Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Beate Marie Johnsen Vest-Agder fylkesting Norway [email protected] Benjamin Daumiller Europäisches Institut für Innovation e. V.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Report: Care-North
    North Sea STAR Spreading Transnational Results Annex C: Energy Project Case Study Reports Targeted Analysis 2013/2/23 Final Report | Version 31/03/2014 Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ 4 1. 1. Build with CaRe (BwC) ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Aims and Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.3. Rationale for the project ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.4. The Build with CaRe Partnership ....................................................................................................... 12 1.5. Project Impacts in Relation to Expected Outcomes .......................................................................... 15 1.6. Project Evaluation .............................................................................................................................. 17 1.7. Participation in Cluster Projects .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • European Strategy 2017 - 2021
    European Strategy 2017 - 2021 Eastern Norway County Network is a political alliance between the eight counties in Eastern Norway – Akershus, Buskerud, Hedmark, Oppland, Oslo, Telemark, Vestfold and Østfold Photos: © Scanstock Photo Production: Grafisk senter Akershus fylkeskommune November 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 5 2.0 Basis for the European policy work 6 3.0 Vision and objectives of the European policy work 8 3.1 Strategies and target sectors 8 3.2 Important political focus areas for joint efforts 12 3.3 Key topics of the European policy work 13 3 4 1. 1. INTRODUCTION Eastern Norway County Network’s European policy for ENCN’s work. The chairmanship will be implemented strategy is intended as a tool for joint European policy as a separate project within the framework of ENCN. work via Eastern Norway County Network and as a support platform for the regional authorities’ European Promoting the region’s interests in the European policy involvement1. The regional authorities in Eastern Norway context is demanding in terms of resources, and it is have long been engaged in cross-border cooperation, often a challenge for the individual regional authority to both individually and jointly within the framework of allocate sufficient resources and expertise to this work. Eastern Norway County Network. As a result of the Through Eastern Norway County Network, the regional counties’ location in Northern Europe, at the intersection authorities’ European policy efforts can be strengthened between the North Sea and the Baltic Sea, the involve- by exchanging information and knowledge, coordinating ment targets nearby countries and regions in particular the available expertise and resources, sharing tasks – the Nordic countries, the North Sea region and the and taking advantage of the networks that exist among Baltic Sea region.
    [Show full text]
  • International Newsletter
    International Newsletter No 1 | 2014 County Mayor of Hordaland, Tom-Christer Nilsen, was elected President of the North Sea Commission at the Annual General Meeting 27th June 2014, here accompanied by Vice-president Kerstin Brunnstrøm (representing Vestra Gøtaland) and John Lamb (representing Southend on Sea). County Mayor of Hordaland elected President of the North Sea Commission, read more on page 8 70th anniversary of D-day landings: A special visit to Hordaland’s partner region Lower Normandy, page 2 The Thing Sea Trail: M/S Nybakk on a historical voyage, read more on page 6 Clean North Sea Shipping-project (CNSS): Results and recommendations, read more on page 11 Hordaland County Council | International Services | P.O.Box 7900, 5020 Bergen, Norway Editor: Barbara Harterink | [email protected] 2 International newsletter I No 01/14 Our partner regions gratitude for those who helped with the liberation on 6th June 1944. Seven Norwegian war heroes were among those from five countries – Great Britain, the US, France, Norway and Canada who attended a special veteran medal ceremony hosted by the region. The region of Lower Normandy had also invited their other regions of cooperation to attend the anniversary events and they had organised a full and interesting programme for the delegations. The delegation from Hordaland attended a “family meeting” with the other invited regions from Canada, China, Macedonia and UK. The themes for the meeting included human rights, remem- brance, freedom, UNESCO status and cultural heritage. Mr Sandal and Mr Ekerhovd gave a short speech on these issues. Hordaland has already given their support for the application to put the Lower Normandy, D-Day beaches on the UNESCO World Heritage listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping of Alternative Fuel in Public Transport Services Among North Sea Commission (NSC) Members
    Mapping of alternative fuel in public transport services among North Sea Commission (NSC) members Presentation at seminar on “Alternative fuels with a cross-border perspective”, Brussels 9 November 2016 Jon Halvard Eide, Adviser, North Sea Commission Transport group, Vest-Agder, Norway About the North Sea Commission • Founded in 1989 to promote partnerships and cooperation in the North Sea Region • One of six geographical commissions under the CPMR • Politically-governed organisation with some 30 member regions from 7 countries (UK, NL, FR, DE, DK, SE and NO). President from and Secretariat in Västra Götaland Region in Sweden • Thematic groups on energy, maritime resources, transport and attractive communities (culture, tourism, economic development) • Functions and activities: policy development and political lobbying, development of transnational projects and exchange of knowledge and best practice Background • The NSC Transport group performed a mapping on the use of alternative fuels in public transport services in 2015 – 2016 • The mapping is covering both past, present and planned schemes, as well as all relevant modes - incl. buses, trams/light rail, rail and ferries. • The following member regions contributed to the mapping: Västra Götaland (SE), North Denmark, Central Denmark Region, South Denmark Region (DK), Hordaland, Vestfold, Vest-Agder and Aust-Agder, Rogaland (NO), Nord Pas de Calais (FR), Aberdeenshire, Orkney (UK), Northern Netherlands and Schleswig-Holstein (DE) • As this report is only covering about 40% of the NSC member regions it is not considered to give a fully complete & representative picture of the situation in the membership as a whole Use of Alternative Fuel for Public Transport • A majority of the responding members have applied, are currently applying or planning to take up alternative fuels in their public transport services • A variety of different fuels or combinations thereof are used, such as bio- fuels, electricity, hydrogen, natural gas/LNG and diesel hybrids • Bio-fuel, incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Interreg Ivb North Sea Region Waterways for Growth Framework for the Sustainable Development of Inland Waterways Blank Inside Cover Introduction
    INTERREG IVB NORTH SEA REGION WATERWAYS FOR GROWTH FRAMEWORK FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF INLAND WATERWAYS BLANK INSIDE COVER INTRODUCTION Navigable inland waterways - rivers, canals and lakes - form a distinctive feature of the region surrounding the North Sea. Most waterways were made navigable and developed for freight transport reasons. Many still perform this function, particularly in terms of connecting North Sea ports with their hinterland. On other waterways, other functions have become more important, particularly tourism and recreation. From a European and often national policy perspective, inland INTRODUCTION waterways are often considered purely in terms of their transport function. In reality they form a multi-functional green infrastructure resource, delivering a wide range of services to society – economic, social and environmental. Waterways for Growth is a project developed under the Interreg IVB North Sea Region pro- gramme which explores these issues. The project runs from 2009 – 2012 and brings together 15 partners from 6 countries surrounding the North Sea - Belgium (Flanders), Netherlands, Germany, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom (see Appendix). Partners include national waterway agencies, regional and local authorities and tourism development bodies. The project is led by Canal & River Trust (formerly British Waterways), the main national inland waterway authority in the UK. Waterways for Growth is supported by pilot actions carried out in the partner areas under three themes:- n Business and product development n Waterway regeneration n Sustainable management of the waterways A key overall output of the project is the development of this transnational Framework for the sustainable development of inland waterways. Drawing upon the project results, this suggests a way forward for the on-going development of the region’s waterways, by building on their multi-functional role.
    [Show full text]
  • 34 Cpmr General Assembly
    CONFÉRENCE DES RÉGIONS PÉRIPHÉRIQUES MARITIMES D’EUROPE CONFERENCE OF PERIPHERAL MARITIME REGIONS OF EUROPE 6, rue Saint-Martin 35700 RENNES - F Tel. : + 33 (0)2 99 35 40 50 - Fax : + 33 (0)2 99 35 09 19 e.mail : [email protected] – web : www.crpm.org 34 th CPMR GENERAL ASSEMBLY 25/27 October 2006 - Murcia (Spain) The Peripheral Maritime Regions listed below met in Murcia (Spain) on 25-27 October 2006 for the 34th CPMR General Assembly ABERDEENSHIRE (UK), ABRUZZO (IT), AÇORES (PT), ALENTEJO (PT), ALGARVE (PT), ANATOLIKI MAKEDONIA THRAKI (GR), ANDALUCIA (ES), AQUITAINE (FR), ARAGÓN (ES), ARGYLL & BUTE (UK), ÅRHUS (DK), ASTURIAS (ES), BALEARES (ES), BASSE- NORMANDIE (FR), BORDER (DONEGAL, IE), BORNHOLM (DK), BRETAGNE (FR), BUSKERUD (NO), CALARASI (RO), CAMPANIA (IT), CANAKKALE (TR), CANARIAS (ES), CANTABRIA (ES), CASTILLA Y LEÓN (ES), CENTRE (FR), CENTRO (PT), COMUNITAT VALENCIANA (ES), CORNWALL (UK), CORSE (FR), DEVON (UK), DYTIKI ELLADA (GR), EAST MIDLANDS REGIONAL ASSEMBLY (UK), EAST OF ENGLAND REGIONAL ASSEMBLY (UK), EAST OF SCOTLAND EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM (UK), EDIRNE (TR), FAMAGUSTA (CY), FIFE (UK), FRIULI VENEZIA-GIULIA (IT), GALATI (RO), GALICIA (ES), GÄVLEBORG (SE), GLOUCESTERSHIRE* (UK), GOTLAND (SE), HALLAND (SE), HAMPSHIRE (UK), HAUTE-NORMANDIE (FR), HIGHLAND (UK), HORDALAND (NO), IONIA NISIA (GR), ISLE OF MAN (UK), ITÄ-UUSIMAA (FI), KLAIPEDA (LT), KRITI (GR), KYMENLAAKSO (FI), LA REUNION (FR), LANGUEDOC-ROUSSILLON (FR), LAZIO (IT), LISBOA E VALE DO TEJO (PT), MADEIRA (PT), MARTINIQUE (FR), MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN (DE), MØRE
    [Show full text]
  • 37Th General Assembly of the CPMR 1-2 October 2009 – Gothenburg (Västra Götaland, Sweden)
    CONFERENCE DES REGIONS PERIPHERIQUES MARITIMES D’EUROPE CONFERENCE OF PERIPHERAL MARITIME REGIONS OF EUROPE 6, rue Saint-Martin 35700 RENNES - F Tel. : + 33 (0)2 99 35 40 50 - Fax : + 33 (0)2 99 35 09 19 e.mail : [email protected] – web : www.crpm.org 37th General Assembly of the CPMR 1-2 October 2009 – Gothenburg (Västra Götaland, Sweden) The Peripheral Maritime Regions listed below met in Gothenburg (Västra Götaland, Sweden), France) on 1-2 October 2009 for the 37th CPMR General Assembly ABERDEEN CITY (UK ), ABERDEENSHIRE (UK ), AÇORES (PT ), ALENTEJO (PT ), ANDALUCIA (ES ), ANGUS (UK ), AQUITAINE (FR ), ARAGÓN (ES ), ARGYLL & BUTE (UK ), ASTURIAS (ES ), BALEARES (ES ), BASSE -NORMANDIE (FR ), BLEKINGE (SE ), BORDER (DONEGAL , IE ), BORNHOLM (DK ), BREMEN (DE ), BRETAGNE (FR ), BUSKERUD (NO ), CAMPANIA (IT ), CANTABRIA (ES ), CATALUNYA (ES ), CENTRO (PT ), COMUNITAT VALENCIANA (ES ), CORNWALL (UK ), CORSE (FR ), EAST MIDLANDS REGIONAL ASSEMBLY (UK ), EAST OF ENGLAND REGIONAL ASSEMBLY (UK ), EMILIA ROMAGNA (I T), FAMAGUSTA (CY ), FIFE (UK ), FRIULI -VENEZIA -GIULIA (IT ), GALICIA (ES ), GÄVLEBORG (SE ), GOTLAND (SE ), GOZO (MT ), HALLAND (SE ), HAMPSHIRE (UK ), HAUTE -NORMANDIE (FR ), HIGHLAND (UK ), HORDALAND (NO ), IDA -VIRUMAA (EE ), ISLE OF MAN (B RITISH ISLES ), ITÄ -UUSIMAA (FI ), JÖNKÖPING (SE )*, KYMENLAAKSO (FI ), LAZIO (IT), LISBOA E VALE DO TEJO (PT ), MADEIRA (PT ), MARTINIQUE (FR ), MECKLENBURG - VORPOMMERN (DE ), MELILLA (ES ), MIDI -PYRÉNÉES (FR ), MIDTJYLLAND (DK ), MØRE OG ROMSDAL (NO ), MONASTIR (TN ), MURCIA (ES
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Study INTERREG NSR 2021-2027
    Scoping Study INTERREG NSR 2021-2027 Final Report with Addendum Scoping Study INTERREG NSR 2021-2027 North Sea Region Programme Document information Client Interreg North Sea Region Programme Version 0.3 Date 09 September 2020 Distribution JS North Sea Region Programme Regarding Final Report with Addendum, for circulation prior to the PPG 4A meeting of 16 September 2020 Page 2 of 54 Scoping Study INTERREG NSR 2021-2027 North Sea Region Programme Content Summary .................................................................................................................... 6 Policy Objective 1: A smarter Europe ........................................................................ 6 Policy Objective 2: A greener, low-carbon Europe ....................................................... 8 Policy Objective 3: A more connected Europe ............................................................ 10 Policy Objective 4: A more social Europe .................................................................. 11 Policy Objective 5: A Europe closer to citizens ........................................................... 11 Interreg Specific Objective 1: Better Interreg governance ........................................... 12 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 14 2 Territorial overview ................................................................................................ 15 3 Policy Objectives for the NSR Programme 2021-2027 ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report No 313/09
    Report No 313/09 ANGUS COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE 21 APRIL 2009 SUBJECT: ATTENDANCE AT CONFERENCE OF PERIPHERAL MARITIME REGIONS (CPMR) AND NORTH SEA COMMISSION (NSC) EVENTS 2009-10 REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES Abstract: This Report seeks approval for Elected Member nominations and representation at CPMR and NSC events in 2009-10. 1 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 It is recommended that the Committee a) Approves travel and attendance by one nominated Elected Member to CPMR and NSC events as detailed in this Report. b) Approves travel and attendance by one nominated Elected Member to additional CPMR and NSC events as they arise during 2009-10. c) Delegates authority to the Chief Executive and the Leader of the Council to agree which elected member will attend each CPMR or NSC events in terms of recommendations (a) and (b) hereof. d) Notes approval of attendance of officers at appropriate CPMR and NSC events during 2009-10. 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 The Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions (CPMR )is a forum for approximately 28 EU countries from 160 peripheral maritime regions to have a stronger voice in Europe, while the North Sea Commission (NSC) with members from 71 regions around the North Sea, including Angus, represents the North Sea area vision and encourages joint working and cooperation through its Thematic Groups. Further details are attached at appendix 1. 2.2 Officers of Angus Council have attended meetings of the NSC Thematic Groups on an ad-hoc basis over recent years. An Elected Member and officer normally attend the annual NSC General Assembly and in 2008 also attended the CPMR General Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • BTV International News Bulletin BTV Is a Regional Cooperation Between the County Municipalities of Buskerud, Telemark and Vestfold Counties
    BTV International News Bulletin BTV is a Regional Cooperation between the County Municipalities of Buskerud, Telemark and Vestfold Counties Final Issue www.btvregion.no/internasjonalt The BTV Region: The BTV region actively participates in the development of national and international regional policy, international development programs and international projects which contribute to a democratic and sustainable development. By 2020, the BTV region aims to be recognized as an attractive and innovative region in Europe. B The BTV international team’s main areas of focus for international cooperation are towards: T V BTV Municipalities, Youth, Business Development and Participation in International Meeting Places. Action Plan The BTV Regional Cooperation comes to a close Background The BTV regional cooperation was a trial project to see how 3 Norwegian counties could combine some focus areas with joint working tasks and form a ‘trial’ region with political representation – ‘a regional council’. The project had a time span from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2007. The cooperation was approved of by the Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development in December 2003. The three counties have cooperated successfully on both political and administrative levels. The aim of the BTV regional cooperation included: – Providing business and industry with good opportunities for growth – Encouraging the establishment of new businesses – Increasing employment – Savings in procurement and investments There were 11 representatives from each county, of which a total of 33 representatives formed a Regional Council. The Regional Council was headed by the Chairperson of the County Councils, in turn, each for a period of 16 months. The Regional Council took over several assignments from the State and from the counties.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH SEA CONFERENCE 2016 15-17 JUNE 2016, Billund, Denmark
    NORTH SEA CONFERENCE 2016 15-17 JUNE 2016, Billund, Denmark PARTICIPANTS LIST First name Surname Organisation and project idea Country E-Mail Adrian Mass Allianz für die Region GmbH Germany [email protected] Growing into Industry 4.0 Albert Haan SNN The Netherlands [email protected] Albert Ruiter Province of Fryslan The Netherlands a.ruiter"fryslan.nl Alexander Somoza European Commission Other [email protected] Allan Lauritzen Guldborgsund Havne Denmark [email protected] Anders Wengen Buskerud County Authority Norway [email protected] Anders Laustsen CenSec Denmark [email protected] Andrea Wiencke Allianz für die Region GmbH Germany andrea.wiencke@allianz -fuer -die - Growing into Industry 4.0 region.de Andreas Doerich Lübeck University of Applied Sciences Germany [email protected] Andreas Lervik Østfold County Council Norway [email protected] Angelica Kaus Waddenacademie The Netherlands [email protected] SalFar Saline Farming Anja Domnick Common Wadden Sea Secretariat Germany domnick@wadd ensea -secretariat.org PROWAD LINK Anja Dalsgaard Interreg North Sea Region Programme Secretariat Denmark [email protected] Anke Spoorendonk Ministry of European Affairs Schleswig-Holstein Germany [email protected] Ann Irene Saeternes Eastern Norway County Network Norway [email protected] Anna Maria Sønderholm Væksthus Midtjylland Denmark [email protected] Anne Udd Region Halland Sweden [email protected] Anne Holl Hansen Guldborgsund Municipality Denmark [email protected]
    [Show full text]