Full Spring 2006 Issue the .SU
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Alternative Naval Force Structure
Alternative Naval Force Structure A compendium by CIMSEC Articles By Steve Wills · Javier Gonzalez · Tom Meyer · Bob Hein · Eric Beaty Chuck Hill · Jan Musil · Wayne P. Hughes Jr. Edited By Dmitry Filipoff · David Van Dyk · John Stryker 1 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ 3 The Perils of Alternative Force Structure ................................................... 4 By Steve Wills UnmannedCentric Force Structure ............................................................... 8 By Javier Gonzalez Proposing A Modern High Speed Transport – The Long Range Patrol Vessel ................................................................................................... 11 By Tom Meyer No Time To Spare: Drawing on History to Inspire Capability Innovation in Today’s Navy ................................................................................. 15 By Bob Hein Enhancing Existing Force Structure by Optimizing Maritime Service Specialization .............................................................................................. 18 By Eric Beaty Augment Naval Force Structure By Upgunning The Coast Guard .......................................................................................................... 21 By Chuck Hill A Fleet Plan for 2045: The Navy the U.S. Ought to be Building ..... 25 By Jan Musil Closing Remarks on Changing Naval Force Structure ....................... 31 By Wayne P. Hughes Jr. CIMSEC 22 www.cimsec.org -
DEPARTMENT of the NAVY the Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350 Phone, 703–697–7391
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350 Phone, 703–697–7391. Internet, www.navy.mil. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY GORDON R. ENGLAND Director, Office of Program Appraisal THOMAS TESCH Special Assistant for Acquisition and DOUGLAS COMBS Business Reform Under Secretary of the Navy DIONEL M. AVILES Director, Small and Disadvantaged Business NANCY J. TARRANT Utilization Auditor General of the Navy RICHARD A. LEACH Director, Naval Criminal Investigative DAVID L. BRANT Service Chief of Information REAR ADM. TERRY L. MCCREARY, USN Chief Information Officer DAVID M. WENNERGREN Chief of Legislative Affairs REAR ADM. MARK FERGUSON, USN General Counsel ALBERTO J. MORA Principal Deputy General Counsel FRANK R. JIMENEZ Deputy General Counsel WILLIAM R. MOLZHAN Naval Inspector General VICE ADM. RONALD A. ROUTE, USN Judge Advocate General of the Navy REAR ADM. JAMES E. MCPHERSON, JAGC, USN Deputy Judge Advocate General REAR ADM. BRUCE E. MACDONALD, JAGC, USN Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial RICHARD GRECO, JR. Management and Comptroller) Deputy ASHLEY GODWIN Director, Office of Budget REAR ADM. BRUCE B. ENGELHARDT, USN Director, Office of Financial Operations MARK E. EASTON Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and WILLIAM A. NAVAS, JR. Reserve Affairs) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Reserve Affairs) HARVEY C. BARNUM Deputy Assistant Secretary (Total Force ANITA K. BLAIR Transformation) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Civilian Human PATRICIA C. ADAMS Resources) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Manpower RUSSELL BELAND Analysis and Assessment) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Military ANITA K. BLAIR Personnel Policy) Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards COL. MARSHA L. CULVER, USMC Executive Director, Board for Correction of W. DEAN PFEIFFER Naval Records Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Installations B.J. -
2016 Annual Dinner Program the 'Ocallahan Society, College of the Holy Cross
College of the Holy Cross CrossWorks Annual Dinner Program The 'O Callahan Society 9-24-2016 2016 Annual Dinner Program The 'OCallahan Society, College of the Holy Cross Follow this and additional works at: http://crossworks.holycross.edu/ocs_dinner Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation The 'O Callahan Society, College of the Holy Cross, "2016 Annual Dinner Program" (2016). Annual Dinner Program. Paper 6. http://crossworks.holycross.edu/ocs_dinner/6 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The 'O Callahan Society at CrossWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Annual Dinner Program by an authorized administrator of CrossWorks. 1961 2001 1997 O’CALLAHAN SOCIETY DINNER 75th Anniversary of NROTC Celebration Q saturday september 24, 2016 hogan campus center college of the holy cross 2015 Chairman’s Welcome Today’s Events BILL MCCARTHY ’76 HOMECOMING AND DINNER PROGRAM Dear Members, Friends, and Guests, Society Annual Meeting Evening Program Welcome to the sixteenth annual O’Callahan Society Dinner! This year we are celebrating 9:30 a.m. Coffee Colors Ceremony/National Anthem the 75th Anniversary of the establishment of the Naval ROTC program at the College of 10:00 a.m. Meeting Invocation the Holy Cross. We are fortunate to have in our midst this evening two members of the first Hogan Campus Center, Room 403 class, Ambassador J. William Middendorf and Mr. Edwin P. Meyer. Rev. Philip L. Boroughs, S.J. President, College of the Holy Cross Over the years, we have been fortunate to welcome a number of distinguished flag and NROTC Battalion Tailgate general officers as our speakers. -
Pdf 44562.Pdf
AHM AHM AHM AHM AHM AHM TOP NEWS AHM AHM AHM8 2018 CNSF ANNOUNCES CHANGES TO SURFACEAHM AHM WARFARE OFFICER QUALIFICATION INSTRUCTION AHM From Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet Public Affairs AHMALL HANDS MAGAZINEAHM AHMPDF OF THE NAVY AHM Commander, Naval Surface Forces/ now documenting it in the instruction. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY Commander of Naval Surface Force, The minimum time requirement The Honorable Richard V.AHM Spencer U.S. Pacific Fleet announced a revision for SWOs to attain their qualification AHM to the requirements for qualification is not specified in the instruction. CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS and designation as a surface warfare However, open communication with Adm. John M.AHM Richardson officer (SWO), July 23. NPC is required if a qualification is NAVY CHIEF OF INFORMATION, ACTING Effective immediately, designators expected to take longer than the first U.S. Navy photo MC2 Devin M. Langer Capt. Gregory L. Hicks 116X and lateral transfers into the SWO division officer tour. Ships must actively community are the only designators manage and maintain Personnel DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY eligible to pursue SWO qualification. permanently assigned to either a Qualification Standards Plan of Action This change aligns with new career path commissioned or pre-commissioning and Milestones (PQS POAMs) for each SENIOR ENLISTED ADVISOR revisions, which focuses on increased U.S. Navy surface ship. officer to ensure the officer is on track Gray Team-Navy Media experience on ships, including Non-116X officers, who are for SWO qualification. In addition to the MCCS (SW/AW/SG) Josh Thompson increased bridge watchstanding currently pursuing a SWO PQS POAM, SWOs must keep a log book opportunities for SWOs. -
2017 Progress Report
Department of Defense Response to Executive Order 13287, “Preserve America,” Section 3: Reporting Progress on the Identification, Protection, and Use of Federal Historic Properties Includes Information on the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force fiscal years 2014-2016 October 2017 Defense Section 3 Report 2 Introduction This report satisfies the requirements of Section 3(c) of Executive Order (EO) 13287, “Preserve America,”1 for the Department of Defense (DoD). The Preserve America EO directs each Federal agency with real property management responsibilities to submit reports on its “progress in identifying, protecting, and using historic properties in its ownership.” The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) developed questions to assist Federal agencies in meeting the reporting requirements of the Preserve America EO. DoD’s consolidated answers to those questions posed by the ACHP includes information on the Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force for fiscal years (FYs) 2014-2016.2 This report references policy and guidance documents from the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and the Military Departments. These documents provide the framework necessary to balance and integrate proactive management of cultural resources with all aspects of the military mission. This report also provides summary data on the DoD Cultural Resources Program. The DoD is a large and complex Federal agency with the critical mission to provide the military forces needed to deter war and to protect the security of the United States.3 The DoD’s installations and facilities are critical pieces of this national defense mission. The DoD manages the largest portfolio of real property assets (structures and buildings), which includes historic properties, in the Federal government. -
US Navy Program Guide 2012
U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s preeminent cal change continues in the Arab world. Nations like Iran maritime force. Our fleet operates forward every day, and North Korea continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, providing America offshore options to deter conflict and while rising powers are rapidly modernizing their militar- advance our national interests in an era of uncertainty. ies and investing in capabilities to deny freedom of action As it has for more than 200 years, our Navy remains ready on the sea, in the air and in cyberspace. To ensure we are for today’s challenges. Our fleet continues to deliver cred- prepared to meet our missions, I will continue to focus on ible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power pro- my three main priorities: 1) Remain ready to meet current jection to prevent and contain conflict and to fight and challenges, today; 2) Build a relevant and capable future win our nation’s wars. We protect the interconnected sys- force; and 3) Enable and support our Sailors, Navy Civil- tems of trade, information, and security that enable our ians, and their Families. Most importantly, we will ensure nation’s economic prosperity while ensuring operational we do not create a “hollow force” unable to do the mission access for the Joint force to the maritime domain and the due to shortfalls in maintenance, personnel, or training. littorals. These are fiscally challenging times. We will pursue these Our Navy is integral to combat, counter-terrorism, and priorities effectively and efficiently, innovating to maxi- crisis response. -
America's First Frogman: the Draper Kauffman Story
Naval War College Review Volume 59 Article 18 Number 2 Spring 2006 America’s First Frogman: The Draper Kauffman Story Robert G. Kaufman Elizabeth Kauffman Bush Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Kaufman, Robert G. and Bush, Elizabeth Kauffman (2006) "America’s First Frogman: The Draper Kauffman Story," Naval War College Review: Vol. 59 : No. 2 , Article 18. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol59/iss2/18 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen BOOK REVIEWS 175 Kaufman and Bush: America’s First Frogman: The Draper Kauffman Story had spent as much time dissecting the Laurence), Kauffman persevered at the Chavez regime as those that preceded it. Naval Academy despite his poor eye- One of the few drawbacks is that there sight, which nearly prevented him from is little attention to an examination of attending and initially denied him a Hugo Chavez and his inner circle of commission in the Navy when he grad- advisors. uated in 1933. This book is a must-read for anyone Disappointed but undaunted, he ac- who wishes to get beyond Chavez’s cepted a position at a shipping company, rhetoric and red beret. It would enrich U.S. -
Navies and Soft Power Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force NEWPORT PAPERS
NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS 42 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE WAR NAVAL Navies and Soft Power Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force NEWPORT PAPERS NEWPORT 42 Bruce A. Elleman and S. C. M. Paine, Editors U.S. GOVERNMENT Cover OFFICIAL EDITION NOTICE The April 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil-rig fire—fighting the blaze and searching for survivors. U.S. Coast Guard photograph, available at “USGS Multimedia Gallery,” USGS: Science for a Changing World, gallery.usgs.gov/. Use of ISBN Prefix This is the Official U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identified to certify its au thenticity. ISBN 978-1-935352-33-4 (e-book ISBN 978-1-935352-34-1) is for this U.S. Government Printing Office Official Edition only. The Superinten- dent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly be labeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN. Legal Status and Use of Seals and Logos The logo of the U.S. Naval War College (NWC), Newport, Rhode Island, authenticates Navies and Soft Power: Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force, edited by Bruce A. Elleman and S. C. M. Paine, as an official publica tion of the College. It is prohibited to use NWC’s logo on any republication of this book without the express, written permission of the Editor, Naval War College Press, or the editor’s designee. For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-00001 ISBN 978-1-935352-33-4; e-book ISBN 978-1-935352-34-1 Navies and Soft Power Historical Case Studies of Naval Power and the Nonuse of Military Force Bruce A. -
Winter 2013 Full Issue the .SU
Naval War College Review Volume 65 Article 19 Number 1 Winter 2012 Winter 2013 Full Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation War College, The .SU . Naval (2012) "Winter 2013 Full Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 65 : No. 1 , Article 19. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol65/iss1/19 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. War College: Winter 2013 Full Issue NAVAL WAR C OLLEGE REVIEW NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Winter 2012 Volume 65, Number 1 Winter 2012 Winter Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2012 1 NWC_Winter2012.indd 1 9/22/2011 9:17:07 AM Naval War College Review, Vol. 65 [2012], No. 1, Art. 19 Cover Orbis terrae compendiosa descriptio, a double-hemisphere projection fi rst pub- lished in 1569 by the Flemish cartogra- pher Gerhardus Mercator (1512–94), fa- mous for the eponymous global projection widely used today for, especially, nautical charts. This version was engraved by his son Rumold (1545–99) and issued in 1587. The map is one of thirty rare maps of similarly high technical and aesthetic value exhibited in Envisioning the World: The Earliest Printed Maps, 1472 to 1700. The exhibit, organized by the Sonoma County Museum in Santa Rosa, California, is drawn from the collection of Henry and Holly Wendt. -
Military Leadership and Organizational Innovation: a Case Study of the Pacific Theater in Ww Ii
DISSERTATION APPROVED BY June 16, 2020 James R. Martin Jr. Date James R. Martin, Jr., Ph.D., Chair Elizabeth Elliot-Meisel, Ph.D., Committee Member Jennifer Moss Breen, Ph.D., Director _______________________________________ Gail M. Jensen, Ph.D., Dean MILITARY LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE PACIFIC THEATER IN WW II ___________________________________ By Anthony C. Zinni ___________________________________ A DISSERTATION IN PRACTICE Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of Creighton University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Interdisciplinary Leadership _________________________________ Omaha, NE (May 15, 2020) Copyright (2020), Anthony C. Zinni This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no part of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. iii Abstract The US military, faced with unprecedented challenges, has sought to transform its services and other commands into more innovative organizations and has struggled in trying to understand the process to accomplish this. Studies that have been conducted to determine how best to make this transformation have not offered a comprehensive methodology or model that has proven useful. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the practices of military leadership teams and organizational innovation in historic and highly successful military commands, specifically in the World War II Pacific theater of operations, to gain insights into how current and future leadership may influence innovation. The research examined historical documents, leader accounts, and scholarly literature on innovation. Through this case study, insights were gained into how current and future leadership may influence the transformation into innovative organizations through their practices. -
CAPSTONE 19-4 Indo-Pacific Field Study
CAPSTONE 19-4 Indo-Pacific Field Study Subject Page Combatant Command ................................................ 3 New Zealand .............................................................. 53 India ........................................................................... 123 China .......................................................................... 189 National Security Strategy .......................................... 267 National Defense Strategy ......................................... 319 Charting a Course, Chapter 9 (Asia Pacific) .............. 333 1 This page intentionally blank 2 U.S. INDO-PACIFIC Command Subject Page Admiral Philip S. Davidson ....................................... 4 USINDOPACOM History .......................................... 7 USINDOPACOM AOR ............................................. 9 2019 Posture Statement .......................................... 11 3 Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip S. Davidson, U.S. Navy Photos Admiral Philip S. Davidson (Photo by File Photo) Adm. Phil Davidson is the 25th Commander of United States Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM), America’s oldest and largest military combatant command, based in Hawai’i. USINDOPACOM includes 380,000 Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen and Department of Defense civilians and is responsible for all U.S. military activities in the Indo-Pacific, covering 36 nations, 14 time zones, and more than 50 percent of the world’s population. Prior to becoming CDRUSINDOPACOM on May 30, 2018, he served as -
Not for Publication Until Released by the House Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEAPOWER AND PROJECTION FORCES STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE SEAN J. STACKLEY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY (RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACQUISITION) AND VICE ADMIRAL JOSEPH P. MULLOY DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS FOR INTEGRATION OF CAPABILITIES AND RESOURCES AND LIEUTENANT GENERAL ROBERT S. WALSH DEPUTY COMMANDANT COMBAT DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION & COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEAPOWER AND PROJECTION FORCES OF THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SEAPOWER AND PROJECTION FORCES CAPABILITIES FEBRUARY 25, 2016 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEAPOWER AND PROJECTION FORCES Chairman Forbes, Ranking Member Courtney, and distinguished members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to address the Department of Navy’s seapower and projection forces capabilities. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 President’s Budget submission is governed by the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), which implements the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance (DSG) and continues our efforts to ensure our ability to protect the homeland, build security globally, project power and win decisively. As described in the Chief of Naval Operations’ A Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority and the Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps’ Advance to Contact, today’s strategic environment is dramatically more globalized with accelerating change. Global connections continue to multiply, fueled by rapid advances and proliferation in technology, particularly information technology. Our competitors are pursuing advanced weapon systems at levels and a pace of development that we have not seen since the mid-1980s.