MATENEK - TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Final Report Friday, November 22, 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MATENEK - TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Final Report Friday, November 22, 2019 MATENEK - TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Final Report Friday, November 22, 2019 Table of Executive Summary 3 Results and policy lessons 3 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Document purpose ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 1.2 Activity background…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 The importance of ‘effective teachers’ 4 Bilateral education reforms 5 Shifting to job-embedded professional development 5 Leveraging digital technologies 6 1.3 Matenek program design overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 2. The Matenek pilot 8 2.1 Program design ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 1. Formative research 8 2. Product development research 9 3. Rapid prototyping and user-testing 9 4. Identifying appropriate professional learning and development content 10 2.2 Program Implementation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 Ensuring fidelity of implementation 11 Advantages and disadvantages 12 Challenges 13 3. Monitoring, evaluation and learning 14 3.1 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 Difference-in-differences 16 3.2 Pilot population and sample ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….16 Teachers and school leaders 16 3.3 Data collection methods ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..17 Teachers 17 School leaders 17 MoEYS staff 18 4. Findings 19 Outcome 1: More teachers are knowledgeable about content and pedagogy, which results in a change in their classroom practice.………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 19 Outcome 1.1 Preparation for class 19 Outcome 1.2 On-pace delivery of lessons and subjects 24 Outcome 1.3 Fidelity of lesson implementation 25 Outcome 1.4 Content and pedagogy skills 26 Outcome 1.5 Attitudes and behaviours 28 Outcome 2: More school leaders are able to understand teachers’ needs and provide better support ……29 Outcome 2.1 Understanding of needs and support 29 Outcome 3: More MoEYS staff understand, value, and use Matenek and other ICTs. ………………………………..30 Outcome 3.1 MoEYS understand and value using ICTs and Matenek to achieve education outcomes 30 Outcome 3.2 MoEYS use of ICTs and Matenek to achieve education outcomes 32 Outcome 3.3 MoEYS feel confident using ICTs and Matenek to achieve education outcomes 33 5. Cost effectiveness 34 Value for Money 36 6. Pathways to scale 39 Model 1: Grade One expansion plus ‘over-the-top’ 39 Model 2: Grade 1 & 2 and content expansion 40 Model 3: Eskola integration & Grade 1 Expansion 40 Potential barriers to scaling 40 Beyond 2020 & Exit Strategy 41 7. Conclusion 42 8. Appendices 43 Matenek - Final Report - Catalpa International Ltd 2 Executive Summary Matenek is a digital learning platform and program designed to improve student outcomes by improving teacher abilities. When teachers learn more, their students do too. Matenek is a first-of-its-kind program and web platform for Timor-Leste, built through a successful collaboration with the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). It is aligned with the National Teaching Curriculum and Australian Embassy goals. Matenek was designed specifically for teachers with low digital literacy and limited access to reliable internet. Matenek’s design and launch happened against the background of a profound national education reform. This reform is rolling out a new child-centred primary education curriculum and changing the language of instruction. Matenek aims to support the MoEYS’ effort to implement this reform, especially the curriculum roll-out. The Matenek design took place from April 2018 to February 2019. Implementation of the pilot program, involving 14 teachers across 14 schools and over 500 students, is running from March - December 2019. Results and policy lessons Impact on education: Teachers used the Matenek program to prepare for class for 45 minutes each day, more than double the amount of preparation time pre-pilot. In addition to usage, initial research suggests that this converted into tangible and observable changes in their classroom behaviour, improving teacher effectiveness and enabling them to implement the national curriculum with greater fidelity. The additional preparation time enabled Matenek teachers to teach more effectively compared to teachers in the control group (second grade teachers not in the program) improving their readiness to teach, student readiness, and preparation of didactic materials. Matenek teachers also taught their lessons more on pace and with more fidelity and implemented more classroom practices and strategies compared to control teachers. This was especially true in the area of responding to student questions, praising both male and female students, and putting student work up on the wall. There was also a reduction in all teachers’ use of verbal and physical violence. The research also showed the success of the pilot’s impact on school leaders and MoEYS staff. School leaders reported Matenek teachers were more prepared for class, and school leaders were better able to see their teaching progress as it was clearly and visually tracked in Matenek. Cost effectiveness: Based on our estimates, Matenek affords the MoEYS a cost effective, efficient, and impactful delivery mechanism for teacher training. These benefits are also seen across distribution and updates to curricular materials and teacher support, when compared to more traditional models. By using Matenek, the MoEYS can save money on training and distribution of materials, as well as save time by making it easier for school leaders to support teachers and track their teaching progress. Recommendations: Catalpa suggests the MoEYS and DFAT work in close partnership to take immediate steps to scale Matenek to more grades, more teachers, or both. This plan for scale should be both financially viable and strategic. Integrating with Eskola should be a path further explored in the future. Matenek - Final Report - Catalpa International Ltd 3 1. Introduction 1.1 Document purpose This report provides an overview of the Matenek program, outlining the inception, design and implementation processes. It presents key implementation findings from the program’s pilot, analysing its impacts from the perspective of teachers, school leaders and the broader MoEYS (specifically those departments engaged in the design and implementation of the program). It also provides a set of recommendations and next steps, followed by appendices. The Matenek program is a partnership between the MoEYS, the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and Catalpa International. 1.2 Activity background The importance of ‘effective teachers’ While the importance of good teachers may be obvious, over the past decade education research has begun to quantify the relationship between teacher quality and student outcomes. Research has shown that effective teachers have a substantial impact on increasing student learning outcomes.1 The effect has been measured in Indonesia, in a study that demonstrated that for every 0.29 units of improvement in a teacher’s knowledge, his or her students’ performance will improve by one unit - a threefold return.2 Moving from a low-performing teacher to a high-performing teacher increases student learning dramatically. Research also demonstrates that investing in teachers is more effective than simply decreasing the teacher-student ratio.3 And ultimately, effective teachers have a substantial impact on the long-term well-being of students, affecting not only their academic achievement and how far they will study, but their income once they enter the labour market. “Effective teachers are teachers who combine deep content knowledge, high-quality practices, creativity and empathy to improve student learning today and in their lifelong learning trajectory.” Understanding the crucial role of the teacher is particularly pertinent to the Timor-Leste context. Following independence in 1999, the nature of schools and the function of teachers changed significantly with the departure of Indonesian school teachers, who made up the majority of the workforce. When schools were reopened, most replacement teachers were unqualified. Research conducted in 2016 found that only about 60% of permanently employed primary teachers held a recognised bachelor level qualification, while many contract/volunteer teachers had only completed secondary school.4 1 Evans, David K. and Yuan, Fei. “The Working Conditions of Teachers in Low and Middle-income Countries”. World Bank Background Paper. 2018. Buhl-Wiggers, Kerwin, Jason T., Smith, Jeffrey A., and Thornton, Rebecca. “The Impact of Teacher Effectiveness on Student Learning in South Africa” Working Paper, 2017. Bau, Natalie, and Das, Jishnu. “Teacher Value-Added in a Low-income Country” American Economic Journal, (forthcoming). 2 ibid 3 Ree, Joppe De. “How Much Teachers Know and How Much It Matters in Class: Analyzing Three Rounds of Subject-Specific Test Score Data of Indonesian Students and Teachers” World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, 2016. 4 DFAT Timor-Leste Sector Overview 2019 Matenek - Final Report - Catalpa International Ltd 4 Understandably, student learning outcomes remained low — in a 2009 Early Grade Reading Assessment of students’ reading ability, the Government of Timor-Leste found that 70% of Grade 1 students were not able to read a single word of the national language of Tetun5. The 2011 Early Grade Mathematics Assessment found that only one-third of students in Grade 1 were able to solve simple additions6. Bilateral education reforms To address this and other learning challenges,
Recommended publications
  • SCM MOVR Graphic Q1 2019
    MOVMOVRR:: MOBILEMOBILE OVERVIEWOVERVIEW REPORTREPORT Q1 2019: KEY FINDINGS View the Full Report at www.scientiamobile.com/movr ASIA NORTH AMERICA EUROPE 4% 2% 2% 2% Form Factor 94% 85% 13% 84% 14% FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET Top 5 Apple iPhone X 5% Apple iPhone 8 Plus 7% Apple iPhone 7 6% Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime Apple iPhone X Apple iPhone 6S Smartphones 4% 7% 4% Apple iPhone 7 Plus 3% Apple iPhone 7 7% Apple iPhone 8 4% Apple iPhone 7 3% Apple iPhone 7 Plus 6% Apple iPhone X 3% Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3% Apple iPhone 8 5% Samsung Galaxy S8 3% Top 5 Apple iPad Air 2 11% Apple iPad Air 2 14% Apple iPad Air 2 11% Tablets Apple iPad Air 8% Apple iPad Air 11% Apple iPad Air 9% Apple iPad 2017 6% Apple iPad 2017 10% Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 7% Apple iPad 2018 6% Apple iPad 2018 8% Apple iPad 2017 7% Apple iPad Mini 4 5% Apple iPad 4 6% Apple iPad 4 5% iOS iOS iOS Smartphone OS 71% 29 % 48% 52% 67 % 32% ANDROID OTHERS .5% ANDROID OTHERS .1% ANDROID OTHERS 1% 45% 40% 32% 24% 30% Smartphone 22% 19% 22% 14% Diagonal Size 11% 13% 10% 3% 3% 3% 5% 0% .2% 2% 0% .1% 0% .2% 1% 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5" 4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6" 6-6.5" 6.5+" 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5" 4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6" 6-6.5" 6.5+" 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5" 4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6" 6-6.5" 6.5+" 59% 51% 47% Tablet 25% 17% 14% Diagonal Size 12% 12% 11% 7% 6% 8% 9% 4% 7% 6% 0% 3% .2% .1% 2% 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" SOUTH AMERICA AFRICA OCEANIA 3% 1% Form Factor
    [Show full text]
  • Barometer of Mobile Internet Connections in Indonesia Publication of March 14Th 2018
    Barometer of mobile Internet connections in Indonesia Publication of March 14th 2018 Year 2017 nPerf is a trademark owned by nPerf SAS, 87 rue de Sèze 69006 LYON – France. Contents 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 The panel ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Speed and latency tests ....................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Objectives and operation of the speed and latency tests ............................................ 2 1.2.2 nPerf servers .................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Tests Quality of Service (QoS) .............................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 The browsing test .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 YouTube streaming test ................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Filtering of test results .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1 Filtering of devices ........................................................................................................ 3 2 Overall results 2G/3G/4G ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic 3D Models Catalogue (On July 26, 2019)
    Electronic 3D models Catalogue (on July 26, 2019) Acer 001 Acer Iconia Tab A510 002 Acer Liquid Z5 003 Acer Liquid S2 Red 004 Acer Liquid S2 Black 005 Acer Iconia Tab A3 White 006 Acer Iconia Tab A1-810 White 007 Acer Iconia W4 008 Acer Liquid E3 Black 009 Acer Liquid E3 Silver 010 Acer Iconia B1-720 Iron Gray 011 Acer Iconia B1-720 Red 012 Acer Iconia B1-720 White 013 Acer Liquid Z3 Rock Black 014 Acer Liquid Z3 Classic White 015 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Black 016 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Red 017 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Yellow 018 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Green 019 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Pink 020 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Orange 021 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Purple 022 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 White 023 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Blue 024 Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Cyan 025 Acer Aspire Switch 10 026 Acer Iconia Tab A1-810 Red 027 Acer Iconia Tab A1-810 Black 028 Acer Iconia A1-830 White 029 Acer Liquid Z4 White 030 Acer Liquid Z4 Black 031 Acer Liquid Z200 Essential White 032 Acer Liquid Z200 Titanium Black 033 Acer Liquid Z200 Fragrant Pink 034 Acer Liquid Z200 Sky Blue 035 Acer Liquid Z200 Sunshine Yellow 036 Acer Liquid Jade Black 037 Acer Liquid Jade Green 038 Acer Liquid Jade White 039 Acer Liquid Z500 Sandy Silver 040 Acer Liquid Z500 Aquamarine Green 041 Acer Liquid Z500 Titanium Black 042 Acer Iconia Tab 7 (A1-713) 043 Acer Iconia Tab 7 (A1-713HD) 044 Acer Liquid E700 Burgundy Red 045 Acer Liquid E700 Titan Black 046 Acer Iconia Tab 8 047 Acer Liquid X1 Graphite Black 048 Acer Liquid X1 Wine Red 049 Acer Iconia Tab 8 W 050 Acer
    [Show full text]
  • Key Findings Infographic
    MOVMOVRR:: MOBILEMOBILE OVERVIEWOVERVIEW REPORTREPORT Q2 2019: KEY FINDINGS View the Full Report at www.scientiamobile.com/movr ASIA NORTH AMERICA EUROPE 5% 3% 2% 2% Form Factor 93% 85% 13% 85% 13% FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET Top 5 Apple iPhone X 4% Apple iPhone 8 Plus 7% Apple iPhone 7 6% Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple iPhone X Apple iPhone 6S Smartphones 3% 7% 4% Apple iPhone 7 3% Apple iPhone 7 6% Apple iPhone 8 4% Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 3% Apple iPhone 7 Plus 6% Apple iPhone X 3% Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3% Apple iPhone 8 5% Samsung Galaxy S8 3% Top 5 Apple iPad Air 2 10% Apple iPad Air 2 13% Apple iPad Air 2 11% Tablets Apple iPad 2018 8% Apple iPad 2017 10% Apple iPad Air 9% Apple iPad 2017 6% Apple iPad Air 10% Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 8% Apple iPad Air 6% Apple iPad 2018 9% Apple iPad 2017 7% Apple iPad Mini 4 5% Apple iPad 4 5% Apple iPad 2018 7% iOS iOS iOS Smartphone OS 71% 28 % 47% 53% 67 % 33% ANDROID OTHERS 1% ANDROID OTHERS .1% ANDROID OTHERS 1% 42% 39% 33% 32% Smartphone 23% 21% 18% Diagonal Size 13% 17% 17% 15% 16% 3% 3% 4% 3% 0% .1% 2% 0% .1% 0% .1% 1% 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5" 4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6" 6-6.5" 6.5+" 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5" 4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6" 6-6.5" 6.5+" 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5" 4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6" 6-6.5" 6.5+" 60% 45% 42% 36% Tablet 16% 14% Diagonal Size 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 7% 4% 4% 7% 6% 7% 0% .2% .1% 2% 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" SOUTH AMERICA AFRICA OCEANIA 3% 2% Form Factor
    [Show full text]
  • Phone Compatibility
    Phone Compatibility • Compatible with iPhone models 4S and above using iOS versions 7 or higher. Last Updated: February 14, 2017 • Compatible with phone models using Android versions 4.1 (Jelly Bean) or higher, and that have the following four sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Magnetometer, GPS/Location Services. • Phone compatibility information is provided by phone manufacturers and third-party sources. While every attempt is made to ensure the accuracy of this information, this list should only be used as a guide. As phones are consistently introduced to market, this list may not be all inclusive and will be updated as new information is received. Please check your phone for the required sensors and operating system. Brand Phone Compatible Non-Compatible Acer Acer Iconia Talk S • Acer Acer Jade Primo • Acer Acer Liquid E3 • Acer Acer Liquid E600 • Acer Acer Liquid E700 • Acer Acer Liquid Jade • Acer Acer Liquid Jade 2 • Acer Acer Liquid Jade Primo • Acer Acer Liquid Jade S • Acer Acer Liquid Jade Z • Acer Acer Liquid M220 • Acer Acer Liquid S1 • Acer Acer Liquid S2 • Acer Acer Liquid X1 • Acer Acer Liquid X2 • Acer Acer Liquid Z200 • Acer Acer Liquid Z220 • Acer Acer Liquid Z3 • Acer Acer Liquid Z4 • Acer Acer Liquid Z410 • Acer Acer Liquid Z5 • Acer Acer Liquid Z500 • Acer Acer Liquid Z520 • Acer Acer Liquid Z6 • Acer Acer Liquid Z6 Plus • Acer Acer Liquid Zest • Acer Acer Liquid Zest Plus • Acer Acer Predator 8 • Alcatel Alcatel Fierce • Alcatel Alcatel Fierce 4 • Alcatel Alcatel Flash Plus 2 • Alcatel Alcatel Go Play • Alcatel Alcatel Idol 4 • Alcatel Alcatel Idol 4s • Alcatel Alcatel One Touch Fire C • Alcatel Alcatel One Touch Fire E • Alcatel Alcatel One Touch Fire S • 1 Phone Compatibility • Compatible with iPhone models 4S and above using iOS versions 7 or higher.
    [Show full text]
  • For Patients
    User Guide for patients CAUTION--Investigational device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. IMPORTANT USER INFORMATION Review the product instructions before using the Bios device. Instructions can be found in this user manual. Failure to use the Bios device and its components according to the instructions for use and all indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and cautions may result in injury associated with misuse of device. Manufacturer information GraphWear Technologies Inc. 953 Indiana Street, San Francisco CA 94107 Website: www.graphwear.co Email: [email protected] 1 Table of Contents Safety Statement 4 Indications for use 4 Contraindication 5 No MRI/CT/Diathermy - MR Unsafe 5 Warnings 5 Read user manual 5 Don’t ignore high/low symptoms 5 Don’t use if… 5 Avoid contact with broken skin 5 Inspect 6 Use as directed 6 Check settings 6 Where to wear 6 Precaution 7 Avoid sunscreen and insect repellant 7 Keep transmitter close to display 7 Is It On? 7 Keep dry 8 Application needs to always remain open 8 Device description 8 Purpose of device 8 What’s in the box 8 Operating information 11 Minimum smart device specifications 11 Android 11 iOS 12 Installing the app 12 Setting up Bios devices 32 Setting up Left Wrist (LW) device 32 Setting up Right Wrist (RW) device 42 Setting up Lower Abdomen (LA) device 52 2 Confirming that all devices are connected 64 Removing the devices 65 Removing the sensors 67 How to charge the transmitter 69 Setting up and using your Self Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) meter 78 Inserting blood values into the application 79 Inserting meal and exercise information 85 Inserting medication information 89 Change sensor 92 Providing feedback 98 Troubleshooting information 101 What messages on your transmitter display mean 101 FAQ? 102 I need to access the FAQ from my app 102 I am unable to install the mobile application on my smart device.
    [Show full text]
  • 6367 Apple Iphone Se 32Gb Gold Pp 6369 Apple
    PROTECCIPON TOTAL UF VALOR VALOR Código Seguro PRIMA Modelo DEDUCIBLE SISCEL Terminales SEGURO UF MENSUAL UF 6367 APPLE IPHONE SE 32GB GOLD PP 0,198 4,538 6369 APPLE IPHONE SE 32GB ROSE GOLD PP 0,198 4,538 6365 APPLE IPHONE SE 32GB SILVER PP 0,198 4,538 6363 APPLE IPHONE SE 32GB SPACE GRAY PP 0,198 4,538 6790 APPLE IPHONE 6 32GB SPACE GRAY P 0,1553 3,534 5756 APPLE IPHONE 6S 32GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 5755 APPLE IPHONE 6S 32GB SPACE GRAY PG 0,2178 5,696 5759 APPLE IPHONE 6S PLUS 32GB SPACE GRAY PP 0,198 4,538 5764 APPLE IPHONE 7 32GB BLACK PG 0,2178 5,696 5765 APPLE IPHONE 7 32GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 6766 APPLE IPHONE 8 64GB SPACE GRAY PG 0,2178 5,696 6768 APPLE IPHONE 8 64GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 6770 APPLE IPHONE 8 64GB GOLD PG 0,2178 5,696 6772 APPLE IPHONE 8 256GB SPACE GRAY PG 0,2178 5,696 6774 APPLE IPHONE 8 256GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 6776 APPLE IPHONE 8 256GB GOLD PG 0,2178 5,696 6778 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 64GB SPACE GRAY PG 0,2178 5,696 6780 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 64GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 6782 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 64GB GOLD PG 0,2178 5,696 6784 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 256GB SPACE GRAY PPL 0,2396 7,992 6786 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 256GB SILVER PPL 0,2396 7,992 6788 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 256GB GOLD PPL 0,2396 7,992 6758 APPLE IPHONE X 64GB SPACE GRAY PPL 0,2396 7,992 6760 APPLE IPHONE X 64GB SILVER PPL 0,2396 7,992 6762 APPLE IPHONE X 256GB SPACE GRAY PPL 0,2396 7,992 6764 APPLE IPHONE X 256GB SILVER PPL 0,2396 7,992 7944 APPLE IPHONE XR 64GB (PRODUCT) RED PG 0,2178 5,696 7948 APPLE IPHONE XR 64GB BLUE PG 0,2178 5,696 7950 APPLE IPHONE
    [Show full text]
  • 6367 Apple Iphone Se 32Gb Gold Pp 6369 Apple
    ANTI DAÑO UF VALOR VALOR Código Seguro PRIMA Modelo DEDUCIBLE SISCEL Terminales SEGURO UF MENSUAL UF 6367 APPLE IPHONE SE 32GB GOLD PP 0,198 4,538 6369 APPLE IPHONE SE 32GB ROSE GOLD PP 0,198 4,538 6365 APPLE IPHONE SE 32GB SILVER PP 0,198 4,538 6363 APPLE IPHONE SE 32GB SPACE GRAY PP 0,198 4,538 6790 APPLE IPHONE 6 32GB SPACE GRAY P 0,1553 3,534 5756 APPLE IPHONE 6S 32GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 5755 APPLE IPHONE 6S 32GB SPACE GRAY PG 0,2178 5,696 5759 APPLE IPHONE 6S PLUS 32GB SPACE GRAY PP 0,198 4,538 5764 APPLE IPHONE 7 32GB BLACK PG 0,2178 5,696 5765 APPLE IPHONE 7 32GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 6766 APPLE IPHONE 8 64GB SPACE GRAY PG 0,2178 5,696 6768 APPLE IPHONE 8 64GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 6770 APPLE IPHONE 8 64GB GOLD PG 0,2178 5,696 6772 APPLE IPHONE 8 256GB SPACE GRAY PG 0,2178 5,696 6774 APPLE IPHONE 8 256GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 6776 APPLE IPHONE 8 256GB GOLD PG 0,2178 5,696 6778 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 64GB SPACE GRAY PG 0,2178 5,696 6780 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 64GB SILVER PG 0,2178 5,696 6782 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 64GB GOLD PG 0,2178 5,696 6784 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 256GB SPACE GRAY PPL 0,2396 7,992 6786 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 256GB SILVER PPL 0,2396 7,992 6788 APPLE IPHONE 8 PLUS 256GB GOLD PPL 0,2396 7,992 6758 APPLE IPHONE X 64GB SPACE GRAY PPL 0,2396 7,992 6760 APPLE IPHONE X 64GB SILVER PPL 0,2396 7,992 6762 APPLE IPHONE X 256GB SPACE GRAY PPL 0,2396 7,992 6764 APPLE IPHONE X 256GB SILVER PPL 0,2396 7,992 7944 APPLE IPHONE XR 64GB (PRODUCT) RED PG 0,2178 5,696 7948 APPLE IPHONE XR 64GB BLUE PG 0,2178 5,696 7950 APPLE IPHONE XR 64GB
    [Show full text]
  • SCM MOVR Graphic Q4 2018 Copy
    MOVMOVRR:: MOBILEMOBILE OVERVIEWOVERVIEW REPORTREPORT Q4 2018: KEY FINDINGS View the Full Report at www.scientiamobile.com/movr ASIA NORTH AMERICA EUROPE 3% 2% 2% 2% Form Factor 95% 85% 13% 84% 14% FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET Top 5 Apple iPhone X 6% Apple iPhone 7 8% Apple iPhone 7 6% Samsung J7 Prime Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple iPhone 6S Smartphones 4% 7% 5% Apple iPhone 7 Plus 4% Apple iPhone X 7% Apple iPhone 8 3% Apple iPhone 7 4% Apple iPhone 7 Plus 7% Samsung Galaxy S8 3% Apple iPhone 8 Plus 3% Apple iPhone 6S 5% Apple iPhone 6 3% Top 5 Apple iPad Air 2 11% Apple iPad Air 2 14% Apple iPad Air 2 11% Tablets Apple iPad Air 6% Apple iPad Air 11% Apple iPad Air 10% Apple iPad 2017 6% Apple iPad 2017 10% Apple iPad 2017 7% Apple iPad Mini 2 5% Apple iPad 4 7% Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 6% Apple iPad Mini 4 4% Apple iPad Mini 2 6% Apple iPad 4 6% iOS iOS iOS Smartphone OS 69% 30 % 47% 53% 67 % 32% ANDROID OTHERS .5% ANDROID OTHERS .1% ANDROID OTHERS 1% 49% 42% 36% Smartphone 25% 28% 23% 18% 22% Diagonal Size 15% 7% 4% 10% 7% 3% 6% 0% .1% 1% 0% .1% 2% 0% .2% .6% 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5" 4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6" 6-6.5" 6.5+" 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5" 4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6" 6-6.5" 6.5+" 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5" 4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6" 6-6.5" 6.5+" 59% 52% 44% Tablet 22% 24% 14% 13% Diagonal Size 11% 7% 7% 8% 10% 9% 4% 7% 6% .1% 3% .2% .1% 2% 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" SOUTH AMERICA AFRICA OCEANIA 2% 13% 1% Form Factor
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Overview Report January – March 2020
    MOVR Mobile Overview Report January – March 2020 The first step in a great mobile experience TBD 2 TBD 3 Q1 2020 to Q4 2019 Comparisons Top Smartphones • Globally, the Apple Top Smartphones Africa Asia Europe N. America Oceania S. America Global iPhone XR has the Apple iPhone 11 0.79% 1.88% 1.71% 3.27% 5.57% 0.66% 2.40% largest global share Apple iPhone 6S 0.73% 1.70% 2.89% 2.70% 2.31% 2.02% 2.52% at 4.18%, the second Apple iPhone 6S Plus 0.37% 1.55% 0.55% 1.55% 1.16% 0.46% 0.95% largest global share Apple iPhone 7 1.45% 2.38% 4.74% 4.56% 4.04% 2.35% 3.99% belongs to the Apple Apple iPhone 7 Plus 1.07% 3.24% 1.48% 3.64% 2.97% 1.46% 2.34% iPhone 7 at 3.99%. Apple iPhone 8 0.90% 1.48% 3.93% 4.83% 3.75% 1.44% 3.41% Apple iPhone 8 Plus 1.28% 2.63% 1.98% 5.52% 4.19% 1.41% 2.95% • Dropping off the top Apple iPhone X 1.36% 2.53% 3.06% 4.28% 3.66% 1.00% 2.94% smartphone list this Apple iPhone XR 1.15% 2.45% 3.01% 7.42% 7.54% 1.36% 4.18% quarter is the Apple Apple iPhone XS 0.65% 1.34% 1.90% 2.29% 2.73% 0.44% 1.73% iPhone 6, Apple Apple iPhone XS Max 1.01% 1.63% 1.27% 3.54% 2.65% 0.54% 1.77% iPhone SE, Samsung Huawei P20 Lite 1.22% 0.32% 1.65% 0.27% 0.22% 0.89% 0.95% Galaxy J7 (2016) and Huawei Y7 Pro 1.21% 0.21% 0.25% 0.02% 0.12% 0.00% 0.19% the Samsung Galaxy Samsung Galaxy A10 1.15% 0.53% 0.94% 0.28% 2.60% 2.17% 0.83% J5.
    [Show full text]
  • MOVRR:: MOBILEMOBILE OVERVIEWOVERVIEW REPORTREPORT Q4 2020: KEY FINDINGS View the Full Report At
    MOVMOVRR:: MOBILEMOBILE OVERVIEWOVERVIEW REPORTREPORT Q4 2020: KEY FINDINGS View the Full Report at www.scientiamobile.com/movr ASIA NORTH AMERICA EUROPE 3% 4% 2% 4% 2% Form Factor 93% 94% 92% 6% FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET FEATURE SMARTPHONE TABLET Top 5 Apple iPhone 11 3% Apple iPhone 11 5% Apple iPhone 11 4% 2% 4% Apple iPhone XR 4% Smartphones Apple iPhone X Apple iPhone XR Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2% Apple iPhone 7 3% Apple iPhone 7 3% Apple iPhone XR 2% Apple iPhone X 3% Apple iPhone X 3% Apple iPhone 8 Plus 2% Apple iPhone 8 3% Apple iPhone 8 3% Top 5 Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet 7% Apple iPad 2018 9% Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 8% Tablets Huawei dtab Compact 6% Apple iPad Air 2 7% Apple iPad Air 2 7% Apple iPad 2018 6% Apple iPad 2017 7% Apple iPad 2018 6% Huawei Mediapad T5 4% Apple iPad Air 6% Apple iPad Air 6% Apple iPad Air 2 4% Apple iPad 2019 5% Apple iPad 2017 4% iOS iOS iOS Smartphone OS 74% 26% 60% 40% 68 % 32% ANDROID OTHERS .1% ANDROID OTHERS .1% ANDROID OTHERS .1% 38% 36% 32% 26% 26% 24% Smartphone 21% 22% Diagonal Size 17% 14% 7% 10% 7% 6% 4% 6% 3% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5"4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6"6-6.5" 6.5+" 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5"4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6"6-6.5" 6.5+" 2-3" 3-4" 4-4.5"4.5-5" 5-5.5" 5.5-6"6-6.5" 6.5+" 65% 60% 50% Tablet 24% 19% 15% 13% Diagonal Size 11% 9% 10% 8% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" 7-7.5" 7.5-8" 8-9" 9-9.5" 9.5-10" 10-11" 11+" SOUTH AMERICA AFRICA OCEANIA 1% 2% 4% 3% Form Factor 97% 7% 89 %
    [Show full text]
  • Case 6:19-Cv-00385-ADA Document 1 Filed 06/21/19 Page 1 of 18
    Case 6:19-cv-00385-ADA Document 1 Filed 06/21/19 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION ANCORA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Civil Action No. 6:19-cv-385 Plaintiff, Jury Trial Requested v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT This is an action for patent infringement in which Ancora Technologies, Inc. makes the following allegations against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”): RELATED CASE 1. This case is related to the action Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al., filed June 21, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division. PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Ancora Technologies, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a place of business at 23977 S.E. 10th Street, Sammamish, Washington 98075. 3962538v1/014360 Case 6:19-cv-00385-ADA Document 1 Filed 06/21/19 Page 2 of 18 3. Defendant Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Korea with a principal place of business at 129, Samsung-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea 443-742. 4. Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary corporation of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. organized and existing under the laws of New York with a principal place of business at 85 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660 and offices and/or other facilities in Texas at least at 12100 Samsung Blvd, Austin, Texas 78754; 2800 Wells Branch Pkwy, Austin, TX 78728; 1301 East Lookout Drive, Richardson, Texas 75082; and 6635 Declaration Drive, Plano, TX 75023.
    [Show full text]