Bird Migration Monitoring in the Saint Nikola Wind Farm, Kaliakra Region, in Autumn 2017, and an Analysis of Potential Impact After Eight Years of Operation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bird Migration Monitoring in the Saint Nikola Wind Farm, Kaliakra Region, in Autumn 2017, and an Analysis of Potential Impact After Eight Years of Operation Bird migration monitoring in the Saint Nikola Wind Farm, Kaliakra region, in autumn 2017, and an analysis of potential impact after eight years of operation Dr. Pavel Zehtindjiev Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113, Sofia, 2 Gagarin St., Bulgaria e-mail: [email protected] Dr. D. Philip Whitfield Natural Research Ltd, Banchory, UK November 2017 Report to AES Geo Energy OOD, 32A Cherni Vrah blvd, Sofia, Bulgaria 1 TERMS OF USE You understand and agree that the information in, or derived from, this document may not be copied, republished, redistributed, transmitted, altered, edited, used or exploited in any manner for any purpose, without the express written permission of AES Geo Energy OOD ("AES"). You also agree that AES and its data providers shall not be liable for any errors in the content, or for any actions taken by you, or any third-party, in reliance thereon. Facts and other information discussed in this document have been obtained from sources considered reliable, but are not guaranteed, and AES makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this document or any other document or website referred to it or accessed through a hyperlink on AES' website. When you access a non-AES website, you understand that it is independent from AES, and that AES has no control over the content on that website. In addition, a link to a non-AES website does not mean that AES endorses or accepts any responsibility for the content, or the use, of such website. In no event will AES be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, special or other consequential damages for any use of this document, including, without limitation, any breach of law, any lost profits, business interruption, loss of programs or other data on your information handling system or otherwise, even if we are expressly advised of the possibility of such damages. All information is provided by AES on an "as is" basis only. AES provides no representations and warranties, express or implied, including the implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose, merchantability and non-infringement. Except as explicitly stated otherwise, any notices of any dispute with respect to these Terms of Use or document shall be given by mail to AES Geo Energy OOD, 32A Cherni Vrah blvd, Sofia, Bulgaria. Any disputes arising out of your use of this document shall be governed in all respects by the laws of Bulgaria. Both parties submit to the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration at the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry in compliance with its rules for litigation based on arbitration agreements. Copyright © AES Geo Energy 2017. All rights reserved. 2 Contents INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 4 METHODS ................................................................................................................................ 5 THE STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................. 5 STUDY DURATION AND EQUIPMENT ............................................................................. 5 BASIC VISUAL OBSERVATION PROTOCOL .................................................................. 6 METHOD OF COLLISION VICTIM MONITORING ....................................................... 8 STATISTICAL METHODS .................................................................................................... 8 TURBINE SHUTDOWN SYSTEM (TSS) ............................................................................. 8 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................................... 9 COMPOSITION OF SPECIES AND NUMBER OF BIRDS PASSING THROUGH SNWF ......................................................................................................................................... 9 ALTITUDE OF AUTUMN MIGRATION ........................................................................... 16 DIRECTION OF AUTUMN BIRD MIGRATION ............................................................. 19 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVED ‘MAJOR’ INFLUXES OF SOARING MIGRANTS AND TURBINE SHUTDOWN SYSTEM ........................... 25 COLLISION VICTIM MONITORING ............................................................................... 30 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................... 34 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 35 3 SUMMARY 1. This report presents the results of 78 consecutive days of monitoring and mitigation at Saint Nikola Wind Farm (SNWF) in 2017, its 8th operational year. The continued purpose is to investigate the possible impacts of SNWF on migrating birds. 2. Spatial and temporal dynamics in the numbers of different species passing through the wind farm territory during autumn migration 2017 (15 August to 31 October) are presented. The data from the autumn monitoring in the years 2008 to 2017 are used to investigate the potential change in species composition, numbers, altitude or the flight direction of birds observed in these nine years at SNWF. 3. The variations in numbers of species, absolute number of birds, overall altitudes of flight and migratory direction of birds most sensitive to wind turbines do not indicate an adverse effect of the wind farm on diurnal migrating birds. 4. The Turbine Shutdown System (TSS) probably contributed to a reduced risk of collision during all years of operation within infrequent periods of intensive soaring bird migration and provided a safety mechanism to reduce collision risk for single birds and flocks of endangered bird species. 5. Regular searches under operational turbines for collision victims were continued, as in several previous years. In autumn 2017 these searches recorded only casualties, for several species of no conservation concern: four Common Swifts, three Yellow-legged gulls, one Chiffchaff, one Willow warbler, one Common moorhen, one Grey partridge, one Red-backed shrike, one Red-breasted flycatcher and one Scops owl. 6. The predicted mortality rates by species based on preconstruction data on numbers of migrating birds are not supported by the mortality observed during any of the eight years of operation of SNWF. The levels of mortality predicted pre-construction have not been recorded during any year of operation. This is largely because ‘worst case’ predictions were based on BSPB (Bulgarian BirdLife partner) data that substantially exaggerated the numbers of migrants passing through SNWF. 7. The results to date continue to indicate that SNWF does not constitute a significant displacement/disturbing obstacle or mortality threat, either physically or demographically, to any of the populations of diurnal autumn migrants observed in this study. INTRODUCTION AES Geo Energy OOD constructed a 156 MW wind farm consisting of 52 turbines: the St Nikola Wind Farm (SNWF). In autumn 2008, SNWF did not exist; in autumn 2009 the facility was built but not operational (i.e. turbine blades were stationary), and in the autumns of 2010 - 2017 SNWF was operational. In previous SNWF autumn reports the major focus was assessment of potential barrier effect on birds migrating through the territory and the level of collision mortality of migrants. The analysis of the data until now showed no evidence for cumulative long term changes in the migratory bird fauna. The main results of the autumn monitoring of bird migration in the vicinity of SNWF in previous years are published at: 4 http://www.aesgeoenergy.com/site/Studies.html. In these studies negligible collision mortality of migrating birds was found; indicating a high micro avoidance rate of the turbines by migrating bird species. The present report updates the information on spatial distribution and temporal presence of birds in SNWF during autumn 2017 with, as in previous reports, special focus on soaring species deemed most sensitive to wind turbines. The observed increase of birds in SNWF in previous autumn seasons under westerly winds was tested statistically in a detailed correlative analysis of wind direction and bird numbers in autumn 2017. Figure 1. Schematic representation of the main autumnal migratory flyway (blue arrows) and the location of SNWF (in red) based on visual observations and satellite tracks for this region (upper left corner: https://maps.birdlife.org/MSBtool/ ) METHODS The study area SNWF is located in NE Bulgaria, approximately three to seven kilometers inland of the Black Sea coast and the cape of Kaliakra (Fig. 1). The wind farm lies between the road from the village of Bulgarevo to St. Nikola (municipality of Kavarna), and the 1st class road E 87 Kavarna – Shabla. The location of observation points is presented in Fig.2. Study duration and equipment The study was carried out between 15 August and 31 October 2017 using standard methods that are comparable for all ten autumn seasons since studies began in 2008, using up to six field ornithologists making visual observations. The surveys were made as in previous seasons 5 during the day, in a standard interval of time between 8 AM and 6 PM astronomic time (for details see http://www.aesgeoenergy.com/site/Studies.html) Basic Visual Observation Protocol The autumn 2017 study involved
Recommended publications
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Behaviour of the Long-Legged Buzzard (.Buteo Rufinus) in North-Eastern Greece
    © Deutschen Ornithologen-Gesellschaft und Partner; download www.do-g.de; www.zobodat.at Die Vogelwarte 39, 1998: 176-182 Reproduction and behaviour of the Long-legged Buzzard (.Buteo rufinus) in North-eastern Greece By Haralambos Alivizatos, Vassilis Goutner and Michael G. Karandinos Abstract: Alivizatos , H., V. Goutner & M. G. Karandinos (1998): Reproduction and behaviour of the Long- legged Buzzard ( Buteo rufinus) in North-eastern Greece. Vogelwarte 39: 176-182. The breeding biology of the Long-legged Buzzard ( Buteo rufinus) was studied in the Evros area, north-eastern Greece in 1989, 1990, 1992 and 1993. The mean number of young fledged per pair per year was similar between years with an overall average of 0.93 (1.58 per successful pair). Of ten home range variables examined, the num­ ber of alternative nest sites and the extent of forest free areas in home ranges were significant predictors of nest­ ling productivity. Aggressive interactions were observed with 18 bird species (of which 12 were raptors), most commonly with the Buzzard {Buteo buteo). Such interactions declined during the course of the season. Prey pro­ visioning to nestlings was greatest in the morning and late in the afternoon declining in the intermediate period. Key words: Buteo rufinus, reproduction, behaviour, Greece. Addresses: Zaliki 4, GR-115 24 Athens, Greece (H. A.); Department of Zoology, Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, GR-54006, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece (V. G.); Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens 75 Iera Odos 1 1855 Athens, Greece (M. G. K.). 1. Introduction The Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus) is a little known raptor of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A New Female-Like Morph of Juvenile Male Levant Sparrowhawk (Accipiter Brevipes) – Sexual Mimicry to Avoid Intra-Specific Predation?
    EUROPEAN JOURNALEUROPEAN OF ECOLOGY JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY EJE 2015, 1(1): 64-67, doi: 10.1515/eje-2015-0008 A new female-like morph of juvenile male Levant Sparrowhawk (Accipiter brevipes) – sexual mimicry to avoid intra-specific predation? Reuven Yosef1, Lorenzo Fornasari2 1 Ben Gurion University ABSTRACT - Eilat Campus, P. O. Box In migrant Levant Sparrowhawk (Accipiter brevipes) at Eilat, Israel, we noted that juvenile males had two differ- 272, Eilat 88000, Israel ent morphs – the one described to date in literature; and a second, previously undescribed morph, with female- Corresponding Author: [email protected] like barring on the chest and flanks interspersed with tear-shaped elongated spots, giving an overall female-like appearance. Here we forward the hypothesis that explain the evolutionary consequences for the female-like 2 FaunaViva - Viale Sar- plumage of juvenile males as that of intra-specific sex mimicry developed to avoid intra-specific predation by ca, 78 - 20125 Milano, the larger females. Italy, e-mail: lorenzo. [email protected] KEYWORDS Levant sparrowhawk – intraspecific predation – avoidance – morph © 2015 Reuven Yosef, Lorenzo Fornasari This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license INTRODUCTION The Levant Sparrowhawk has dichromatism and re- Chromatic mimicry as a strategy to avoid inter-specific preda- versed sexual size dimorphism wherein the female is larger by tion, or to have a reproductive advantage, is well documented 9–10% than the male (Cramp & Simmons 1980; Clark & Yosef in many insect, amphibian and reptilian taxa (e.g.Gross & Char- 1997). The sexes also differ in colour, and the male has blue- nov 1980; Krebs & Davies 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Female-Like Morph of Juvenile Male Levant Sparrowhawk (Accipiter Brevipes) – Sexual Mimicry to Avoid Intra-Specific Predation?
    EUROPEAN JOURNALEUROPEAN OF ECOLOGY JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY EJE 2015, 1(1): 64-67, doi: 10.1515/eje-2015-0008 A new female-like morph of juvenile male Levant Sparrowhawk (Accipiter brevipes) – sexual mimicry to avoid intra-specific predation? Reuven Yosef1, Lorenzo Fornasari2 1 Ben Gurion University ABSTRACT - Eilat Campus, P. O. Box In migrant Levant Sparrowhawk (Accipiter brevipes) at Eilat, Israel, we noted that juvenile males had two differ- 272, Eilat 88000, Israel ent morphs – the one described to date in literature; and a second, previously undescribed morph, with female- Corresponding Author: [email protected] like barring on the chest and flanks interspersed with tear-shaped elongated spots, giving an overall female-like appearance. Here we forward the hypothesis that explain the evolutionary consequences for the female-like 2 FaunaViva - Viale Sar- plumage of juvenile males as that of intra-specific sex mimicry developed to avoid intra-specific predation by ca, 78 - 20125 Milano, the larger females. Italy, e-mail: lorenzo. [email protected] KEYWORDS Levant sparrowhawk – intraspecific predation – avoidance – morph © 2015 Reuven Yosef, Lorenzo Fornasari This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license INTRODUCTION The Levant Sparrowhawk has dichromatism and re- Chromatic mimicry as a strategy to avoid inter-specific preda- versed sexual size dimorphism wherein the female is larger by tion, or to have a reproductive advantage, is well documented 9–10% than the male (Cramp & Simmons 1980; Clark & Yosef in many insect, amphibian and reptilian taxa (e.g.Gross & Char- 1997). The sexes also differ in colour, and the male has blue- nov 1980; Krebs & Davies 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • A Partial Post-Juvenile Molt and Transitional Plumage in the Shikra (Accipiter Badius) and Grey Frog Hawk ( a Ccipiter Soloensis)
    THE JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF • THE RAPTOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. VOL. 34 DECEMBER 2000 NO. 4 J. RaptorRes. 34(4) :249-261 ¸ 2000 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. A PARTIAL POST-JUVENILE MOLT AND TRANSITIONAL PLUMAGE IN THE SHIKRA (ACCIPITER BADIUS) AND GREY FROG HAWK ( A CCIPITER SOLOENSIS) MARC HERREMANS AND MICHEL LOUETTE RoyalMuseum for CentralAfrica, Department Zoology, Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 Tervuren,Belgium ABSTRACT.--Molthas been poorly studied in the Accipitridae. Examination of museum specimens showedthat there are three age-relatedplumages in the Shikra (Accipiterbadius) and Grey Frog Hawk (A. soloensis)similar to the pattern known in the Levant Sparrowhawk(A. brevipes).The juvenile plumage with its distinctively-spottedunderside is replacedby a transitionalpost-juvenile plumage during a partial contour molt between 4-10 mo of age. More feathers on the ventral side than on the dorsal side are replaced during this first contour molt, which is arrested at variousstages of incomplete feather replace- ment. Usually, a significantpart of the ventral pattern changesfrom spotted to barred, whereby the barring is on averagemore prominent than in adults. The early development of a transitional post- juvenile plumage might be related to early sex signaling.The adult plumage replacesthe transitional post-juvenileplumage during a completemolt at about one year of age. In the subspeciesA. b.poliopsis of the Shikra, which has almost no sexual dimorphism in the adult plumage, the transitional plumage is uncommon and very poorly developed. KEYWORDS: Shikra;Accipiter badius; Greyb?og Hawk; Accipiter soloensis;Levant Sparrowhawk; Accipiter brevipes;contour molt;, transitional post-juvenile plumage. Muda parcial postjuvenil y de transicionde plumaje en Accipiterbadius y Accipitersoloensis RES0MEN.--Lamuda ha sido poco esmdiada en las Accipitridae.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Birds of Prey and Owls in Hungary
    Chancellor, R. D. & B.-U. Meyburg eds. 2004 Raptors Worldwide WWGBP/MME The Status of Birds of Prey and Owls in Hungary Janos Bagyura and Laszló Haraszthy SUMMARY OF LEGAL PROTECTION OF BIRDS OF PREY IN HUNGARY All species of birds of prey occurring in Hungary are protected by law. Many years ago this was not the case; instead, their killing was encouraged. However, their role in nature is now better understood and legal protection has been improving continously since that time. Much credit is due to Janos Salamon Petényi (1799-1855), founder of Hungarian scientific ornithology. He undertook significant conservation activity in the 1830s, even though legal protection for birds was not existent at that time. The first legislation dealing with birds of prey was enacted in 1883 when the Hunting Act (Act No. 20) was passed. Under this law all species of vultures, eagles, falcons, kites, kestrels, the Goshawk Accipiter gentilis and Eagle Owl Bubo bubo could be shot even during th close season (1st Feb.- 15th Aug.) when hunting activities are restricted during the breeding season of a number of species (including mammals). In 1891 the 2nd International Congress on Ornithology was held in Budapest. This important event made the government aware of their obligations for the conservation of birds. Following the Congress, on the initiative of Otto Herman, the Hungarian Centre for Ornithology was founded in 1893. This was the beginning of nature conservation in Hungary. Since then the ornithological yearbook Aquila has been regularly published. In 1901 the Minister of Agriculture declared 132 bird species to be protected (24 55 Ministerial Decree).
    [Show full text]
  • Accipitridae Species Tree
    Accipitridae I: Hawks, Kites, Eagles Pearl Kite, Gampsonyx swainsonii ?Scissor-tailed Kite, Chelictinia riocourii Elaninae Black-winged Kite, Elanus caeruleus ?Black-shouldered Kite, Elanus axillaris ?Letter-winged Kite, Elanus scriptus White-tailed Kite, Elanus leucurus African Harrier-Hawk, Polyboroides typus ?Madagascan Harrier-Hawk, Polyboroides radiatus Gypaetinae Palm-nut Vulture, Gypohierax angolensis Egyptian Vulture, Neophron percnopterus Bearded Vulture / Lammergeier, Gypaetus barbatus Madagascan Serpent-Eagle, Eutriorchis astur Hook-billed Kite, Chondrohierax uncinatus Gray-headed Kite, Leptodon cayanensis ?White-collared Kite, Leptodon forbesi Swallow-tailed Kite, Elanoides forficatus European Honey-Buzzard, Pernis apivorus Perninae Philippine Honey-Buzzard, Pernis steerei Oriental Honey-Buzzard / Crested Honey-Buzzard, Pernis ptilorhynchus Barred Honey-Buzzard, Pernis celebensis Black-breasted Buzzard, Hamirostra melanosternon Square-tailed Kite, Lophoictinia isura Long-tailed Honey-Buzzard, Henicopernis longicauda Black Honey-Buzzard, Henicopernis infuscatus ?Black Baza, Aviceda leuphotes ?African Cuckoo-Hawk, Aviceda cuculoides ?Madagascan Cuckoo-Hawk, Aviceda madagascariensis ?Jerdon’s Baza, Aviceda jerdoni Pacific Baza, Aviceda subcristata Red-headed Vulture, Sarcogyps calvus White-headed Vulture, Trigonoceps occipitalis Cinereous Vulture, Aegypius monachus Lappet-faced Vulture, Torgos tracheliotos Gypinae Hooded Vulture, Necrosyrtes monachus White-backed Vulture, Gyps africanus White-rumped Vulture, Gyps bengalensis Himalayan
    [Show full text]
  • Raptor Migration in Greece: a Review
    Avocetta 37: 1-7 (2013) Raptor migration in Greece: a review MICHELE PANUCCIO¹*, NICOLANTONIO AGOSTINI¹, CHRISTOS BARBOUTIS2,3 1MEDRAPTORS (Mediterranean Raptor Migration Network) - Via Mario Fioretti 18, 00152 Rome (Italy) 2Antikythira Bird Observatory, Hellenic Ornithological Society - Themistokleous 80, 10681 Athens (Greece) 3Natural History Museum of Crete, University of Crete - P.O. Box 2208, 71409 Heraklion, Crete (Greece) *Corresponding author: Michele Panuccio ([email protected]) Abstract – Greece is located at the southernmost end of the Balkan Peninsula and the shortest distance between Greece and north Africa is roughly 280 km. As raptors mostly fly over land exploiting thermal currents, the ecological barrier shaped by the Mediterranean Sea south of Greece, has a strong impact on the migration strategy adopted by each species. Using data from recent studies at three watchsites in Greece (island of Antikythira, Mount Olympus, National Park of Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli) we discuss the migratory behaviour of some selected species. The three commonest species were the Eurasian marsh harrier Circus aeruginosus, the western honey buzzard Pernis apivorus and the short-toed snake eagle Circaetus gallicus. The first migrates on a broad front over the sea. A similar migration strategy is adopted also by the Eleonora’s falcon Falco eleonorae. The western honey buzzard performs a loop migration strategy concentrating over the island of Antikythira in autumn but bypassing it in spring. The short-toed snake eagle, on the other hand, avoids the crossing of the Mediterranean Sea performing a long detour and crosses the sea at the Bosphorus. Observations suggest that the levant sparrowhawk Accipiter brevipes and the lesser spotted eagle Aquila pomarina adopt a similar strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Identification of European Raptors Steen Christensen, Bent Pors Nielsen, R
    Flight identification of European raptors Steen Christensen, Bent Pors Nielsen, R. F. Porter and Ian Willis INTRODUCTION Identification of birds of prey in flight will always be a problem. The best of us will never be able to feel completely confident about a group of species that shows such diversity of plumage, whose sil­ houettes vary in different circumstances and for which the challenge of identification is so often at considerable range. We four have been studying flight identification of raptors for at least seven years— mostly in Europe, but also in Asia and Africa. A chance meeting in autumn 1968 between B.P.N, and R.F.P. at the now legendary Camlica Hills of the Turkish Bosphorus brought the Danish and English teams together and it was agreed to co-operate in a series of papers covering all the European raptors. Shortly afterwards, the editors of British Birds asked us to consider publication in this journal and so the scheme was born. The series will be completed in eight parts: PART I PART 5 Buzzard Buteo buteo buteo Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus and Steppe Buzzard B. b. vulpinus Lammergeier Gypaetus barbatus Long-legged Buzzard Buteo rufinus Black Vulture Aegypius monacbus Rough-legged Buzzard Buteo hgopus Griffon Vulture Gyps fukus Honey Buzzard Perm's apivorus PART Z PART 6 Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus Gyr Falcon Fako rustkolus Bonelli's Eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus Saker Fako cherrug Short-toed Eagle Circaetus gallicus Lanner Fako biarmicus Osprey Pandion bsliaetus Peregrine Fako peregrinus Red Kite Milvus milvus
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Farms in Thrace: Updating the Proposal for Proper Site Selection
    PROPOSAL 2013 Wind farms in Thrace Updating the proposal for proper site selection Suggested literature reference: WWF Greece. Wind farms in Thrace: Updating the proposal for proper site selection. Dadia-Athens: September 2013. English version: February 2014 Working group: Kafetzis Alkis, Project researcher, Evros Project, WWF Greece, Dadia Christopoulou Ioli, Nature policy officer, WWF Greece Kret Elzbieta, Field researcher, Evros Project, WWF Greece, Dadia Skartsi Dora, Project coordinator, Evros Project, WWF Greece, Dadia Kalevra Natalia, Scientific support collaborator, WWF Greece Kordopatis Panos, Scientific associate, WWF Greece Chasiotis Giorgos, Legal team coordinator WWF Greece Prodromou Michalis, Climate change and energy officer, WWF Greece Plitharas Achilleas, Campaigns officer, WWF Greece EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The region of Thrace, in northeastern Greece, is of exceptional ornithological importance as it hosts habitats that are of European-wide significance mainly due to the presence of large birds of prey and aquatic birds, most of which are under protection and some of them are globally endangered. Indicative of the ornithological value of the region of Thrace is the presence of 3 out of 4 vulture species found in Europe. More specifically, (I) the last remaining breeding collony of the Black Vulture (Aegypius monachus) in the Balkans can be found in the Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli National Park (from here on Dadia National Park) in the Regional Unit (RU) of Evros, (II) the most important breeding collony of the Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvs) in mainland Greece is located in the southern part of the RU of Evros, and (III) more than half of the last remaining breeding pairs of the Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus) in Greece are located inside the RUs of Evros and Rodopi.
    [Show full text]