Airport Master Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Airport Master Plan Chapter Two FORECASTS AIRPORT MASTER PLAN The definition of demand that may be reasonably expected to occur during the useful life of an airport’s key components (e.g., runways, taxiways, terminal buildings, etc.) is an important factor in facility plan‐ ning. In airport master planning, this involves projecting aviation activity for at least a 20‐year timeframe. Aviation demand forecasting for the Grand Canyon National Park Airport (GCN or Airport) will consider commercial passenger enplanements (boardings), based aircraft, and aircraft operations. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has oversight responsibility to review and approve aviation forecasts developed in conjunction with airport planning studies. In addition, aviation activity forecasts may be an important input to future benefit‐cost analyses associated with airport development, and the FAA reviews these analyses when federal funding requests are submitted. The FAA will review individual airport forecasts with the objective of comparing them to its Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF) and the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). Even though the TAF is updated annually, in the past there was almost always a disparity between the TAF and master plan‐ ning forecasts. This was primarily because the TAF forecasts did not consider local conditions or recent trends. In recent years, however, the FAA has improved its forecast model to be a demand‐driven fore‐ cast for aviation services based upon local and national economic conditions, as well as conditions within the aviation industry. DRAFT Chapter Two 2-1 The TAF projections of passenger enplanements and commercial operations at large, medium, and small hub airports are based on a bottom‐up approach. The domestic enplanements are forecast by generat‐ ing origin and destination (O&D) market demand forecasts using the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) quarterly 10 percent sample data to model passenger flow on a quarterly basis. The O&D passenger demand forecasts are based on regression analysis using fares, regional de‐ mographics, and regional economic factors as the independent variables. The O&D forecasts are then combined with DOT T‐100 segment data to generate passenger forecasts by airport pair and segment pair. The segment pair passenger forecasts are assigned to aircraft equipment in order to produce seg‐ ment pair operation forecasts. The quarterly segment pair forecasts are aggregated to produce annual airport forecasts. Forecasts of itinerant general aviation operations and local civil operations at FAA facilities are based primarily on time series analysis. Because military operations forecasts have national security implica‐ tions, the Department of Defense (DOD) provides only limited information on future aviation activity. Hence, the TAF projects military activity at its present level except when FAA has specific knowledge of a change. For instance, DOD may announce a base closing or may shift an Air Force wing from one base to another. As stated in FAA Order 5090.3C, Field Formulation of the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), forecasts should be: • Realistic; • Based on the latest available data; • Reflective of current conditions at the airport (as a baseline); • Supported by information in the study; and • Able to provide adequate justification for airport planning and development. The FAA Terminal Area Forecasts published in January 2016 were utilized to supplement the Master Plan forecasting effort. A summary of those forecasts are presented in Table 2A. The following sections of this chapter will test the reasonableness of each forecast from the TAF as well as develop updated fore‐ casts for use in this Master Plan. DRAFT Chapter Two 2-2 TABLE 2A 2016 FAA Terminal Area Forecast Grand Canyon National Park Airport 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 ENPLANEMENTS Air Carrier 13,178 13,178 13,178 13,178 13,178 13,178 Commuter 103,555 99,052 99,052 99,052 99,052 99,052 Total Enplanements 116,733 112,230 112,230 112,230 112,230 112,230 ANNUAL OPERATIONS Itinerant Air Carrier 106 110 115 115 115 115 Air Taxi 102,063 107,237 112,689 118,419 124,443 130,773 General Aviation 2,874 2,688 2,728 2,768 2,808 2,848 Military 601 601 601 601 601 601 Total Itinerant 105,644 110,636 116,133 121,903 127,967 134,337 Local General Aviation 846 908 928 948 968 992 Military 562 562 562 562 562 562 Total Local 1,408 1,470 1,490 1,510 1,530 1,554 Total Operations 107,052 112,106 117,623 123,413 129,497 135,891 Based Aircraft 38 40 41 41 41 41 Source: FAA Terminal Area Forecast (Jan. 2016) SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS Local and regional forecasts of key socioeconomic variables, such as population, employment, income, and gross regional product (GRP) provide an indication of the potential for growth in aviation activities at an airport. Exhibit 2A summarizes the socioeconomic history and projections for Coconino County and the state of Arizona. Population estimates and projections were gathered from the U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division; and the Arizona Department of Administration – Employment and Popula‐ tion Statistics. Data for employment, income, and GRP was taken from Woods & Poole Complete Eco‐ nomic and Demographic Data Source (CEDDS), 2016. Population in Coconino County grew at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.6 percent between 1970 and 2010. In the past five years, the CAGR has slowed to 1.0 percent. Population in the County is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 0.8 percent through 2035 to 164,844. This growth rate is behind what is projected for the entire state, which is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 1.5 percent through 2035. Employment in the County grew at a 3.6 percent CAGR between 1970 and 2010. Similar to population, that rate slowed in the past five years to 1.3 percent. Employment in the County is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 1.7 percent through 2035, which matches the projected CAGR for employment in that state. Per capita personal income (PCPI) inflation‐adjusted to 2009 dollars dipped as a result of the recession years, but has grown each of the past three years. Inflation‐adjusted PCPI is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 1.4 percent for the County and the state through 2035. DRAFT Chapter Two 2-3 This page intentionally left blank DRAFT Chapter Two 2-4 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Population Employment Income - PCPI ($2009) Gross Regional Product ($millions) ARIZONA POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT 10 Coconino Coconino Coconino Coconino Historical Projected Arizona County Arizona County Arizona County Arizona County Arizona Population YEAR 8 Arizona Employment 1970 1,775,399 48,326 746,654 20,148 17,875 14,602 39,361 963 6 1980 2,718,425 75,008 1,282,615 35,163 21,905 17,953 71,736 1,778 1990 3,665,228 96,591 1,894,098 48,542 25,496 21,039 107,402 2,484 4 People (in millions) People 2000 5,130,632 116,320 2,808,568 70,053 31,923 29,003 199,448 3,929 2 2010 6,392,017 134,421 3,205,898 82,751 33,440 33,271 243,723 5,228 CAGR 1970-2010 3.3% 2.6% 3.7% 3.6% 1.6% 2.1% 4.7% 4.3% 0 1990‘851980‘751970 ‘95 2000 ‘05 2010 ‘15 ‘352030‘252020 2011 6,438,178 134,162 3,265,071 81,983 34,097 33,146 247,902 5,218 COUNTY POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT 200 2012 6,498,569 134,313 3,320,848 82,723 34,531 32,941 255,985 5,290 Historical Projected Coconino County Population 2013 6,581,054 135,695 3,391,722 84,725 34,456 33,478 261,778 5,423 Coconino County Employment 150 2014 6,667,241 139,372 3,461,988 86,500 35,054 34,052 269,909 5,553 2015 6,758,251 141,602 3,532,928 88,284 35,642 34,626 278,042 5,685 100 CAGR 2010-2015 1.1% 1.0% 2.0% 1.3% 1.3% 0.8% 2.7% 1.7% People (in thousands) People 2020 7,346,800 149,769 3,886,240 97,122 38,608 37,509 320,854 6,341 50 2025 7,944,800 156,363 4,250,546 106,137 41,787 40,577 368,353 7,021 2030 8,535,900 161,021 4,618,924 115,160 44,785 43,481 420,117 7,710 0 1970 ‘75 1990‘851980 ‘95 2030‘252020‘152010‘052000 ‘35 2035 9,128,900 164,844 4,988,431 124,096 47,432 46,102 476,348 8,401 INCOME 50 CAGR 2015-2035 1.5% 0.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.4% 1.4% 2.7% 2.0% Historical Projected CAGR - Compound Annual Growth Rate 40 GRP - Gross Regional Product PCPI - Per Capita Personal Income 30 20 Dollars (in thousands) 10 1990‘851980‘751970 ‘95 2000 ‘05 2010 ‘15 ‘352030‘252020 Sources: Historical population (1970-2010) from the U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division Historical population (2011-2015) and population projections from the Arizona Department of Administration - Employment and Population Statistics Coconino County Per Capita Personal Income Employment, Income, and Gross Regional Product from Woods & Poole Complete Economic and Demographic Data Source (CEDDS) 2016. Arizona Per Capita Personal Income Exhibit 2A DRAFT Chapter Two 2-5 SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS This page intentionally left blank DRAFT Chapter Two 2-6 Gross regional product (GRP) is similar to gross domestic product, but on a regional rather than national level. It is also adjusted for inflation to 2009 dollars. GRP for the County dipped from 2010 to 2011 as a result of the recession, but has also recovered and shown growth for the past four years.
Recommended publications
  • Turbulence in the Gulf
    Come and see us at the Dubai Airshow on Stand 2018 AEROSPACE November 2017 FLYING FOR THE DARK SIDE IS MARS GETTING ANY CLOSER? HYBRID-ELECTRIC PROPULSION www.aerosociety.com November 2017 Volume 44 Number 11 Volume TURBULENCE IN THE GULF SUPERCONNECTOR AIRLINES BATTLE HEADWINDS Royal Aeronautical Society Royal Aeronautical N EC Volume 44 Number 11 November 2017 Turbulence in Is Mars getting any 14 the Gulf closer? How local politics Sarah Cruddas and longer-range assesses the latest aircraft may 18 push for a human impact Middle mission to the Red East carriers. Planet. Are we any Contents Clément Alloing Martin Lockheed nearer today? Correspondence on all aerospace matters is welcome at: The Editor, AEROSPACE, No.4 Hamilton Place, London W1J 7BQ, UK [email protected] Comment Regulars 4 Radome 12 Transmission The latest aviation and Your letters, emails, tweets aeronautical intelligence, and feedback. analysis and comment. 58 The Last Word Short-circuiting electric flight 10 Antenna Keith Hayward considers the Howard Wheeldon looks at the current export tariff spat over MoD’s planned Air Support to the Bombardier CSeries. Can a UK low-cost airline and a US start-up bring electric, green airline travel Defence Operational Training into service in the next decade? On 27 September easyJet revealed it had (ASDOT) programme. partnered with Wright Electric to help develop a short-haul all-electric airliner – with the goal of bringing it into service within ten years. If realised, this would represent a game-changing leap for aviation and a huge victory for aerospace Features Cobham in meeting or even exceeding its sustainable goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Supplements
    Technical Supplements S1 The IG JAS Investment In this Technical Supplement the JAS 39 Gripen product concept is outlined, the procurement process documented, the Industry Group IG JAS presented and the critical role of the competent public procurement agency, the FMV, highlighted. S1.1 The Procurement of the JAS 39 Gripen Aircraft with Swing-Role Capabilities The JAS 39 Gripen multirole combat aircraft (J stands for fighter, A for Attack and S for Surveillance/reconnaissance) is a fourth generation aircraft that entered operational service in 1997. It replaced the Viggen, the last of which was taken out of service in 2006. JAS 39 Gripen is a combat aircraft with swing-role capabilities that can change mission in flight. This swing-role capability was unique when Gripen was launched but has later been introduced on the French Rafale and the Eurofighter. Other competing multirole aircraft first have to land to reconfigure its information, guidance, and weapons systems for a new role. Gripen was the first “unstable” aircraft in the world which meant that in order for the aircraft to be stable at all speeds and in all maneuvers many more navigation surfaces are needed than the pilot can possibly control himself to minimize air friction at each moment. He needs incredibly sophisticated computer systems support to maneuver the aircraft effectively and safely. Competing fourth generation combat aircraft are F-35/JSF (the USA, not yet (2009) delivered to market), the Eurofighter Typhoon (the UK, etc.) and Rafale (Dassault, France). JAS 39 Gripen also competes with upgraded versions of the third generation aircraft of Lockheed Martin F-16 (the USA, first delivered in 1978), Boeing F/A18 Hornet (the USA, first delivered in 1983), Dassault Mirage 2000 (France, first delivered in 1983), and Mig-29 (the former Soviet Union, first delivered in 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Business & Commercial Aviation
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION LEONARDO AW609 PERFORMANCE PLATEAUS OCEANIC APRIL 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation AIRCRAFT UPDATE Leonardo AW609 Bringing tiltrotor technology to civil aviation FUEL PLANNING ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Part 91 Department Inspections Is It Airworthy? Oceanic Fuel Planning Who Says It’s Ready? APRIL 2020 VOL. 116 NO. 4 Performance Plateaus Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Analysis
    CHAPTER 5 RUNWAY ANALYSIS 5 5 RUNWAY ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION The primary issue to be addressed in the William R. Fairchild International Airport (CLM) Master Plan involves the ultimate length and configuration of the runway system. At present there are two runways; primary Runway 8/26 and crosswind Runway 13/31. Runway 8/26 is 6,347 feet long and 150-feet wide with a displaced threshold of 1,354 feet on the approach end to Runway 26. The threshold was displaced to provide for an unobstructed visual approach slope of 20:1. Runway 13/31 is designated as the crosswind runway and is 3,250-feet long by 50-feet wide. In the 1997 ALP Update, the FAA determined that this runway was not required to provide adequate wind coverage and would not be eligible for FAA funding of any improvements in the future. The Port of Port Angeles has committed to keeping this runway functional without FAA support for as long as it is feasible. Subsequent sections of this analysis will reexamine the need for the runway. Both runways are supported by parallel taxiway systems with Taxiway A serving Runway 8/26 and Taxiway J for Runway 13/31. Taxiway A is 40 feet wide and Taxiway J is 50 feet wide. AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS In determining airfield requirements, FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13, Airport Design (Change 14), has been consulted. This circular requires that future classification of the airport be defined as the basis for airfield planning criteria. As shown in the forecast chapter, the critical aircraft at CLM is expected to be the small business jet represented by the Cessna Citation within 5-years.
    [Show full text]
  • Could Uavs Improve New Zealand's Maritime Security?
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Could UAVs improve New Zealand’s Maritime Security? 149.800 Master of Philosophy Thesis Massey University Centre for Defence Studies Supervisor: Dr John Moremon By: Brian Oliver Due date: 28 Feb 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ......................................................................................... iv Glossary .................................................................................................. v Abstract ................................................................................................ viii Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: New Zealand's Maritime Environment ................................. 6 The Political Backdrop .................................................................... 10 Findings of the Maritime Patrol Review .......................................... 12 Maritime Forces Review ................................................................. 18 The current state of maritime surveillance ..................................... 19 The National Maritime Coordination Centre ................................... 23 Chapter 2: The Value of New Zealand's Maritime Environment ......... 29 Oil and gas production in New Zealand ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • COMPANY BASED AIRCRAFT FLEET PAX EACH BAR S WEBSITE E-MAIL Pel-Air Aviation Adelaide Brisbane Melbourne Sydney Saab 340 16 34 Y
    PAX BAR COMPANY BASED AIRCRAFT FLEET WEBSITE E-MAIL EACH S Adelaide Saab 340 16 34 Pel-Air Brisbane Additional access Yes www.pelair.com.au [email protected] Aviation Melbourne to REX Airline’s 50 n/a Sydney Saab aircraft Adelaide Citation CJ2 n/a 8 Brisbane Beechcraft n/a 10 Cairns Kingair B200 The Light Darwin Jet Aviation Melbourne n/a www.lightjets.com.au [email protected] Group Sydney Beechcraft Baron n/a 5 *Regional centres on request Broome Metro II n/a 12 Complete Darwin Merlin IIIC n/a 6 n/a www.casair.com.au [email protected] Aviation Jandakot Piper Navajo n/a 7 Network Fokker 100 17 100 Perth n/a www.networkaviation.com.au [email protected] Aviation A320-200 4 180 Challenger 604 1 9 Embraer Legacy n/a 13 Australian Essendon Bombardier n/a 13 Corporate Melbourne Global Express Yes www.acjcentres.com.au [email protected] Jet Centres Perth Hawker 800s n/a 8 Cessna Citation n/a 8 Ultra SA Piper Chieftain n/a 9 NSW King Air B200 n/a 10 Altitude NT n/a www.altitudeaviation.com.au [email protected] Aviation QLD Cessna Citation n/a 5-7 TAS VIC Piper Chieftain 1 7 Cessna 310 1 5 Geraldton Geraldton GA8 Airvan 4 7 n/a www.geraldtonaircharter.com.au [email protected] Air Charter Beechcraft 1 4 Bonanza Airnorth Darwin ERJ170 4 76 n/a www.airnorth.com.au [email protected] *Other cities/towns EMB120 5 30 on request Beechcraft n/a 10 Kirkhope Melbourne Kingair n/a www.kirkhopeaviation.com.au [email protected] Aviation Essendon Piper Chieftain n/a 9 Piper Navajo n/a 7 Challenger
    [Show full text]
  • Market Report a Publication of Saab Aircraft Leasing
    Issue 27 December 2011 MARKET REPORT A PUBLICATION OF SAAB AIRCRAFT LEASING DARWIN DEVELOPS EUROPEAN NETWORK PlottING A NEW COURSE GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL ADDS SAAB 340Bplus AIRCRAFT AND BECOMES SILVER AIRWAYS messaGE FROM CONTENTS Michael Magnusson Golden Air shines as niche Swedish carrier ......................... 3-5 Reflecting on 2011 activity and Darwin develops European network .................................... 6-9 readying for next year’s priorities Flying to the finish line. .................................................... 10-12 Pinnacle positions .................................................................13 As 2011 draws to a close, we can look back over a busy year during which Lakeshore luxury ..................................................................13 we transacted business on many Saab Plotting a new course 340Bplus aircraft. As we have taken Gulfstream International adds Saab 340Bplus aircraft aircraft back from Mesaba, we have found and becomes Silver Airways ........................................... 14-16 new homes for them with both old and new customers. The 30-seat turboprop Saab 340 operators in Thailand expand regional airline service ...........................................................17 continues to be a perfect regional aircraft choice on many regional routes. Saab Destination: Scatsta Airport, Shetland – Scotland. ......18 We are especially pleased that a revitalized Gulfstream International Airlines in Saab 340 Global Operators Conference set for 2012 ...........19 Florida, soon
    [Show full text]
  • Military Aircraft Markings Update Number 76, September 2011
    Military Aircraft Markings Update Number 76, September 2011 Serial Type (other identity) [code] Owner/operator, location or fate N6466 DH82A Tiger Moth (G-ANKZ) Privately owned, Compton Abbas T7842 DH82A Tiger Moth II (G-AMTF) Privately owned, Westfield, Surrey DE623 DH82A Tiger Moth II (G-ANFI) Privately owned, Cardiff KK116 Douglas Dakota IV (G-AMPY) AIRBASE, Coventry TD248 VS361 Spitfire LF XVIE (7246M/G-OXVI) [CR-S] Spitfire Limited, Humberside TX310 DH89A Dragon Rapide 6 (G-AIDL) Classic Flight, Coventry VN799 EE Canberra T4 (WJ874/G-CDSX) AIRBASE, Coventry VP981 DH104 Devon C2 (G-DHDV) Classic Flight, Coventry WA591 Gloster Meteor T7 (7917M/G-BWMF) [FMK-Q] Classic Flight, Coventry WB188 Hawker Hunter GA11 (WV256/G-BZPB) AIRBASE, Coventry WD413 Avro 652A Anson T21 (7881M/G-VROE) Classic Flight, Coventry WK163 EE Canberra B2/6 (G-BVWC) AIRBASE, Coventry WK436 DH112 Venom FB50 (J-1614/G-VENM) Classic Flight, Coventry WM167 AW Meteor NF11 (G-LOSM) Classic Flight, Coventry WR470 DH112 Venom FB50 (J-1542/G-DHVM) Classic Flight, Coventry WT722 Hawker Hunter T8C (G-BWGN) [878/VL] AIRBASE, Coventry WV318 Hawker Hunter T7B (9236M/G-FFOX) WV318 Group, Cotswold Airport WZ798 Slingsby T38 Grasshopper TX1 Privately owned, stored Hullavington XA109 DH115 Sea Vampire T22 Montrose Air Station Heritage Centre XE665 Hawker Hunter T8C (G-BWGM) [876/VL] Classic Flight, Coventry XE689 Hawker Hunter GA11 (G-BWGK) [864/VL] AIRBASE, Coventry XE985 DH115 Vampire T11 (WZ476) Privately owned, New Inn, Torfaen XG592 WS55 Whirlwind HAS7 [54] Task Force Adventure
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Feasibility Study for a 19 PAX Hybrid-Electric Commuter Aircraft
    Air s.Pace ELectric Innovative Commuter Aircraft D2.1 Economic Feasibility Study for a 19 PAX Hybrid-Electric Commuter Aircraft Name Function Date Author: Maximilian Spangenberg (ASP) WP2 Co-Lead 31.03.2020 Approved by: Markus Wellensiek (ASP) WP2 Lead 31.03.2020 Approved by: Dr. Qinyin Zhang (RRD) Project Lead 31.03.2020 D2.1 Economic Feasibility Study page 1 of 81 Clean Sky 2 Grant Agreement No. 864551 © ELICA Consortium No export-controlled data Non-Confidential Air s.Pace Table of contents 1 Executive summary .........................................................................................................................3 2 References ........................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................4 2.2 List of figures ................................................................................................................................5 2.3 List of tables .................................................................................................................................6 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................8 4 ELICA market study ...................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Turboprop and piston engine
    [Show full text]
  • The Years of Change
    The Years of Change In early January of 1993 all the B-2 structural tests were successfully completed. The static load tests were taken to failure to 161% of maximum stress, and the durability test completed more than 2 lifetimes, which represented 20,000 design flight hours. January 1993 confidence was high for the $4-billion PAMPA Program as the company prepared to complete its first flight evaluation aircraft. However, the realities of the “post-cold war” era forced management to gear up for a tough year as the battle of the defense budget continued in Washington. The ailing commercial aviation industry presented additional challenges for the company. Boeing cut production on all their programs, and 1993 looked very gloomy. The company announced plans for down-sizing up to 1,500 people by the end of the year. Vought president Gordon Williams streamlined the management team to help the company ride out the business downturn, and still continue to meet its customer requirements. He stated that “business will be smaller but stronger.” In March 1993 Vought shipped its last engine nacelle for the Canadair business jet while continuing production on the regional jet nacelles. The 500th horizontal stabilizer for the Boeing 767 was shipped during March, and 141 employees elected to retire. In the meantime, Loral Corporation formed a new missiles group by combining Loral Vought Systems and Loral Aeronutronic during the month. At the end of April, 104 employees elected to retire. McDonnell Douglas certified Vought’s business processes in early May, which was another milestone on the way to becoming a preferred supplier for McDonnell Douglas.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
    Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts The overall goal of aviation activity forecasting is to prepare forecasts that accurately reflect current conditions, relevant historic trends, and provide reasonable projections of future activity, which can be translated into specific airport facility needs anticipated during the next twenty years and beyond. Introduction This chapter provides updated forecasts of aviation activity for Kittitas County Airport – Bowers Field (ELN) for the twenty-year master plan horizon (2015-2035). The most recent FAA-approved aviation activity forecasts for Bowers Field were prepared in 2011 for the Airfield Needs Assessment project. Those forecasts evaluated changes in local conditions and activity that occurred since the previous master plan forecasts were prepared in 2000, and re-established base line conditions. The Needs Assessment forecasts provide the “accepted” airport-specific projections that are most relevant for comparison with the new master plan forecasts prepared for this chapter. The forecasts presented in this chapter are consistent with Bowers Field’s current and historic role as a community/regional general aviation airport. Bowers Field is the only airport in Kittitas County capable of accommodating a full range of general aviation activity, including business class turboprops and business jets. This level of capability expands the airport’s role to serve the entire county and the local Ellensburg community. The intent is to provide an updated set of aviation demand projections for Bowers Field that will permit airport management to make the decisions necessary to maintain a viable, efficient, and cost-effective facility that meets the area’s air transportation needs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the UK Aerospace Industry: a Transaction Cost Analysis
    The economics of the UK aerospace industry: A transaction cost analysis of defence and civilian firms Ian Jackson PhD Department of Economics and Related Studies University of York 2004 Abstract The primaryaim of this thesisis to assessvertical integration in the UK aerospace industrywith a transactioncost approach. There is an extensivetheoretical and conceptualliterature on transactioncosts, but a relativelack of empiricalwork. This thesisapplies transaction cost economics to the UK aerospaceindustry focusing on the paradigmproblem of the make-or-buydecision and related contract design. It assesses whetherthe transactioncost approachis supported(or rejected)by evidencefrom an originalsurvey of theUK aerospaceindustry. The centralhypothesis is that UK aerospacefirms are likely to makecomponents in- housedue to higherlevels of assetspecificity, uncertainty, complexity, frequency and smallnumbers, which is reflectedin contractdesign. The thesismakes these concepts operational.The empiricalmethodology of the thesisis basedon questionnairesurvey dataand econometric tests using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) andlogit regressions to analysethe make-or-buy decision and the choiceof contracttype. The resultsfrom this thesisfind limited evidencein supportof the transactioncost approachapplied to the UK aerospaceindustry, in spiteof a bespokedataset. The empiricaltests of verticalintegration for both make-or-buyand contracttype as the dependentvariable yield insufficientevidence to concludethat the transactioncost approachis an appropriateframework
    [Show full text]