Light-Dependent Interactions Between the Drosophila Circadian Clock Factors Cryptochrome, Jetlag, and Timeless

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Light-Dependent Interactions Between the Drosophila Circadian Clock Factors Cryptochrome, Jetlag, and Timeless View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Current Biology 19, 241–247, February 10, 2009 ª2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.042 Report Light-Dependent Interactions between the Drosophila Circadian Clock Factors Cryptochrome, Jetlag, and Timeless Nicolai Peschel,1 Ko Fan Chen,1 Gisela Szabo,1 by the ls-tim allele) as is the case in Veela flies [3]. The and Ralf Stanewsky1,* LL-rhythmic Veela phenotype resembles that of cry mutants 1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences [12, 13]. Also similar to cryb mutants, homozygous mutant Queen Mary University of London Veela flies accumulate abnormally high levels of Tim protein London E1 4NS in the light [3, 14]. Strikingly, both phenotypes are also United Kingdom observed in transheterozygous Veela/+; cryb/+ flies [3]. This strong genetic interaction between tim, jet, and cry prompted us to investigate a potential physical association between Summary Jetlag and Cry proteins in the yeast two-hybrid system (Y2H). In addition, the two different Timeless isoforms were Circadian clocks regulate daily fluctuations of many physio- also tested for interaction with Jetlag or Cryptochrome. In logical and behavioral aspects in life. They are synchronized agreement with an earlier study, light-dependent interaction with the environment via light or temperature cycles [1]. between both Tim proteins and Cry was observed, whereby Natural fluctuations of the day length (photoperiod) and S-Tim interacted more strongly with Cry as compared to temperature necessitate a daily reset of the circadian clock L-Tim (Figure 1A) [10]. Surprisingly, we also observed a striking on the molecular level. In Drosophila, the blue-light photore- light-dependent interaction between Cry and Jet (Figure 1B), ceptor Cryptochrome (Cry) mediates a rapid light-dependent but not between Tim and Jet (Figure 1A). Given that Tim and degradation of the clock protein Timeless (Tim) via the F box Jet do interact in S2 cells cotransfected with cry [2] and our protein Jetlag (Jet) and the proteasome, which initiates the finding that Jet interacts with Cry in yeast, an explanation for resetting of the molecular clock [2, 3]. Cry is also degraded the lack of Tim:Jet binding could be that Cry is essential for in the light but whereas the degradation of Tim is well char- this interaction. acterized [4–8], the mechanism for light-dependent degrada- The interaction between Jetc and Cry is significantly weaker tion of Cry is mostly unknown. Until now it was believed that compared with the wild-type protein (Figure 1B). Keeping in these two degradation pathways are distinct [4, 9]. Here we mind that the LRR is the binding region for the F box proteins’ reveal that Jetlag also interacts with Cry in a light-dependent substrate [15], this weaker association was expected. Addi- manner. After illumination, Jetlag induces massive degrada- tionally, we challenged Jet and Jetc with different Cry muta- tion of Cry, which can be prevented in vitro and in vivo by tions. In CryD the last 20 residues from the C terminus are adding Tim as an antagonist. We show that the affinity of missing, resulting in strong, light-independent interactions of Tim for Cry and Jetlag determines the sequential order of CryD with Tim [16]. We also could reveal a strong light- Tim and Cry degradation and thus reveal an intimate connec- independent interaction between Jet or Jetc and CryD tion between the light-dependent degradation of these two (Figure 1B). The Cryb protein does not interact with Jet or proteins by the same proteasomal pathway. Jetc (Figure 1B), correlating with its inability to bind to Tim in yeast [16]. Results and Discussion The strong biochemical and genetic interaction between cry and jet suggests that the Jet:Cry interaction is important The F box protein Jetlag (Jet) is involved in the resetting mech- in vivo and perhaps required for efficient light-induced Tim anism of the circadian clock [2, 3]. Jet is a putative component turnover. Given that we were unable to detect a direct interac- of a Skp1/Cullin/F-Box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that tion between Jet and Tim in yeast (Figure 1A), this implies that associates with Tim in a light-dependent fashion in an embry- binding of Cry to Tim could modify Tim in a way that it now can onic Drosophila cell line (S2) in the presence of Cry. This inter- bind Jet to induce degradation. Alternatively, the Jet:Cry action promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of Tim in complex binds to Tim (via Cry acting as a bridge), thereby cultured cells [2]. In nature, two Drosophila allelic variants of inducing Tim degradation. timeless can be found: one allele produces a 23 amino acid N-terminally shortened and more light-sensitive form of Tim Jetlag Binds to Cryptochrome and Timeless (s-tim), the other allele encodes both forms (ls-tim) [10, 11]. in Drosophila Cells At the molecular level, S-Tim’s enhanced light sensitivity is To distinguish between these two possibilities, we performed correlated with (and likely due to) enhanced binding to the CoIP experiments in an embryonic Drosophila cell line (S2). A circadian blue-light photoreceptor Cry ([10]; Figure 1A). full-length Jetlag protein fused to a HIS-tag (Jet-H) and untagged versions of Cry and Tim proteins were overex- Light-Dependent Interaction of the F Box Protein Jetlag pressed in S2 cells and immunoprecipitated with HIS antibody. with Cryptochrome in Yeast Cells were grown in darkness and exposed to light for 15 min The hypomorphic jetc mutation carries a single amino acid before performing the assay. As expected from the Y2H change in the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) region of Jet, which results, Cry also interacted with Jet-H in S2 cells (Figure 1C; causes flies to be rhythmic in constant light (LL), but only if see Figure S1 available online for specificity of Cry antibody). they express the less light-sensitive L-Tim protein (encoded Contrary to the Y2H results, Tim also interacts with Jet-H, without the addition of Cry (Figure 1C). When we simulta- neously expressed Tim and Cry in the presence of Jet-H, we *Correspondence: [email protected] could detect only minimal amounts of Tim protein in the input Current Biology Vol 19 No 3 242 Figure 1. Light-Dependent Interactions of Cryp- tochrome, Jetlag, and Timeless in Yeast and Drosophila S2 Cells (A) Yeast cells were grown in constant light at 30C. Binding strength is positively correlated with intensity of the blue staining [10]. (B) Yeast was grown in constant light (light) or under the same conditions, but wrapped in two layers of aluminum foil (dark). (C and D) pAc-Jet-His transfected S2 cells were used for immunoprecipitation with His antibody. Cells were transfected with plasmids as indi- cated, where + is transfected with the vector, 2 is not transfected. CoIPs were repeated three times with similar results. Before harvesting, the cells were exposed to light for 15 min in the absence (C) or presence (D) of MG-132 (added under red light 2 hr before cells were exposed to light). The asterisk marks unspecific background staining. Cry and Tim could not be precipitated by His antibodies in the absence of Jet-His (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). (E) The efficiency of ds-cry RNA treatment was determined by cotransfection of cry (pAc-cry, 1 mg) and different amount of ds-cry RNA. (F) CoIP experiment (performed as in [D]) of S2 cells transfected with pAc-Jet-His, pAc-l-tim, and either ds-cry RNA (2 mg) or ds-gfp RNA as control (2 mg). D should also be reduced by this treatment. CoIP experiments in the presence of MG-132 show that Jet:Tim interactions are dramatically reduced (but still detect- able) after dsRNA treatment (Figure 1F). This demonstrates that endogenous Cry levels are supporting Jet:Tim interaction E F observed in S2 cells. In cells transfected only with tim,we did observe a Jet:Tim interaction, but not a Jet:Cry interaction (Figures 1C and 1D, lanes 3 and 4). Even though the input levels of endogenous Cry and transfected Tim are very low, one would or CoIP fractions (Figure 1C, lanes 5 and 6). We speculated that expect to precipitate equal amounts of both proteins bound the low Tim levels were caused because we reconstituted a fully to Jet, if Cry would indeed form a bridge between Tim and functional light-sensitive clock-resetting protein complex. To Jet. This was not observed, and we repeatedly precipitated test this, we conducted the CoIP experiments also in the pres- only Tim, indicating the existence of Tim:Jet complexes that ence of the proteasomal inhibitor MG-132, which led to an over- are free of Cry. Our results therefore support a model in which all stabilization of the proteins and a clear demonstration of Cry modifies Tim, allowing Tim to interact with Jet after disso- Tim:Jet interactions in S2 cells (Figure 1D, lanes 2–6). The inter- ciation of the Cry:Tim complex. action of Tim with Jet is increased in the presence of Cry, sup- porting the idea that Cry:Tim or Jet:Cry complexes promote Jetlag Promotes Cryptochrome Degradation in Flies binding of Tim to Jet (Figure 1D, compare lanes 4 and 6). If the Jet:Cry interaction is biologically relevant, we would Why could we (and others) detect Tim:Jet interactions in expect to see an effect on Cry degradation in flies with reduced S2 cells [2], but not in yeast (Figure 1A)? The reason for this could jet function.
Recommended publications
  • Paul Hardin, Ph.D. John W
    Department of Biology The College of Arts + Sciences | Indiana University Bloomington About Paul Hardin Distinguished Alumni Award Lecture Thu., Oct. 18, 2018 • 4 to 5 pm • Myers Hall 130 Paul Hardin, Ph.D. John W. Lyons Jr. ’59 Chair in Biology, Texas A&M University Genetic architecture underlying circadian clock initiation, maintenance, and output in Drosophila Circadian clocks drive daily rhythms in metabolism, physiology, and behavior in organisms ranging from cyanobacteria to humans. The identification and analysis of “clock genes” in Drosophila revealed that circadian timekeeping is based on a transcriptional feedback loop Paul Hardin studied the development of the sea in which CLOCK-CYCLE (CLK-CYC) heterodimers activate transcription of their feedback urchin embryo in William Klein’s lab at Indiana repressors PERIOD (PER) and TIMELESS (TIM). Subsequent studies revealed that similar University, from where he received his Ph.D. in transcriptional feedback loops keep circadian time in all eukaryotes and, in the case of 1987. He did his postdoctoral fellowship with animals, that these feedback loops are comprised of conserved components. The “core” Michael Rosbash at Brandeis University, working feedback loop described above operates in conjunction with an “interlocked” feedback on the circadian rhythms of the fruit fly, Drosophila loop in animals to drive rhythmic transcription of hundreds of genes that are maximally melanogaster. His work with Michael Rosbash and expressed at different phases of the circadian cycle. These feedback loops operate in many, Jeff Hall has been instrumental to our understanding but not all, tissues in flies including the brain pacemaker neurons that control rest:activity of how circadian rhythms affect a myriad of rhythms.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibodies Against the Clock Proteins Period and Cryptochrome Reveal the Neuronal Organization of the Circadian Clock in the Pea Aphid
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 02 July 2021 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.705048 Antibodies Against the Clock Proteins Period and Cryptochrome Reveal the Neuronal Organization of the Circadian Clock in the Pea Aphid Francesca Sara Colizzi 1, Katharina Beer 1, Paolo Cuti 2, Peter Deppisch 1, David Martínez Torres 2, Taishi Yoshii 3 and Charlotte Helfrich-Förster 1* 1Neurobiology and Genetics, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 2Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), University of Valencia and CSIC, Valencia, Spain, 3Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan Circadian clocks prepare the organism to cyclic environmental changes in light, temperature, Edited by: or food availability. Here, we characterized the master clock in the brain of a strongly Joanna C. Chiu, photoperiodic insect, the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum, immunohistochemically with antibodies University of California, Davis, United States against A. pisum Period (PER), Drosophila melanogaster Cryptochrome (CRY1), and crab Reviewed by: Pigment-Dispersing Hormone (PDH). The latter antibody detects all so far known PDHs and Hideharu Numata, PDFs (Pigment-Dispersing Factors), which play a dominant role in the circadian system of Kyoto University, Japan many arthropods. We found that, under long days, PER and CRY are expressed in a rhythmic Annika Fitzpatrick Barber, Rutgers, The State University of manner in three regions of the brain: the dorsal and lateral protocerebrum and the lamina. No New Jersey, United States staining was detected with anti-PDH, suggesting that aphids lack PDF. All the CRY1-positive *Correspondence: cells co-expressed PER and showed daily PER/CRY1 oscillations of high amplitude, while Charlotte Helfrich-Förster charlotte.foerster@biozentrum.
    [Show full text]
  • A Polymorphism in the Human Timeless Gene Is Not Associated
    Sleep Research Online 3(2): 73-76, 2000 1096-214X http://www.sro.org/2000/Pedrazzoli/73/ © 2000 WebSciences Printed in the USA. All rights reserved. A Polymorphism in the Human Timeless Gene is not Associated with Diurnal Preferences In Normal Adults Mario Pedrazzoli1, Lin Ling1, Laurel Finn2, Terry Young2, Daniel Katzenberg1 and Emmanuel Mignot1 1Center for Narco l e p s y , Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University 2De p a r tment of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison The effect of a single nucleotide polymorphism, a glutamine to arginine amino acid substitution in the human Timeless gene (Q831R, A2634G), on diurnal preferences was studied in a random sample of normal volunteers enrolled in a population- based epidemiology study of the natural history of sleep disorders. We genotyped 528 subjects for this single nucleotide polymorphism and determined morningness-eveningness tendencies using the Horne-Ostberg questionnaire. Our results indicate that Q831R Timeless has no influence on morningness-eveningness tendencies in humans. CURRENT CLAIM: The A to G polymorphism in the position 2634 of human timeless gene is not related with diurnal preferences. Genetic studies in the last years have advanced our mutations. In animals, mutations such as Clock or Tau (recently understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for the characterized as the CKe gene, Lowrey et al., 2000) are control of circadian rhythms. Most of these studies have used associated not only with a long or short free running period but model organisms such as Neurospora, Arabidopis, Drosophila also with alterations in the phase angle of entrainment under and mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • So Here's a Figure of This, Here's the Per Gene, Here's Its Promoter
    So here's a figure of this, here's the per gene, here's its promoter. There's a ribosome, and this gene is now active, illustrated by this glow and the gene is producing messenger RNA which is being turned into protein, into period protein by the protein synthesis machinery. Some of those protein molecules are unstable and they are degraded by the cellular machinery, the pink ones. And some of them are stable for reasons, which we will come to tomorrow, and the stable proteins accumulate. And this protein build-up continues, the gene is active, RNA is made, protein is produced, and at some point in the middle of the night there's enough protein which has been produced, and that protein migrates into the nucleus and the protein then acts as a repressor to turn off its own gene expression. And in the morning, when the sun comes up these protein molecules start to turn over, they degrade and disappear over the course of several hours leading to the turn-on of the gene, which begins the next cycle, the next production of RNA. Now this animation is similar to the one I showed you yesterday except now we have the positive transcription factor CYC and CLOCK, which actually bind to the per promoter at this e-box and drive transcription, turning on RNA synthesis and here is the production of the per protein by the ribosome, the unstable, pink proteins, which are rapidly degraded and then every other protein or so, molecule is stabilized and accumulates in the cytoplasm during the evening.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mutant Drosophila Homolog of Mammalian Clock Disrupts
    Cell, Vol. 93, 791±804, May 29, 1998, Copyright 1998 by Cell Press AMutantDrosophila Homolog of Mammalian Clock Disrupts Circadian Rhythms and Transcription of period and timeless Ravi Allada,*²³§ Neal E. White,³ Aronson et al., 1994; Shearman et al., 1997; Sun et al., W. Venus So,²³ Jeffrey C. Hall,²³ 1997; Tei et al., 1997). ²³ and Michael Rosbash* k In Drosophila, there are two well-characterized clock *Howard Hughes Medical Institute genes: period (per) and timeless (tim). Protein levels, ² NSF, Center for Biological Timing RNA levels, and transcription rates of these two genes ³ Department of Biology undergo robust circadian oscillations (Zerr et al., 1990; Brandeis University Hardin et al., 1990, 1992; Hardin, 1994; Sehgal et al., Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 1995; So and Rosbash, 1997). In addition, mutations § Department of Pathology in the two proteins (PER and TIM) alter or abolish the Brigham and Women's Hospital periodicity and phase of these rhythms, demonstrating Boston, Massachusetts 02115 that both proteins regulate their own transcription (Har- din et al., 1990; Sehgal et al., 1995; Marrus et al., 1996). Although there is no evidence indicating that the effects Summary on transcription are direct, PER contains a PAS domain, which has been shown to mediate interactions between We report the identification, characterization, and transcription factors (Huang et al., 1993; Lindebro et cloning of a novel Drosophila circadian rhythm gene, al., 1995). Most of these PAS-containing transcription dClock. The mutant, initially called Jrk, manifests dom- factors also contain the well-characterized basic helix- inant effects: heterozygous flies have a period alter- loop-helix (bHLH) DNA-binding domains (Crews, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Genetics of the Fruit-Fly Circadian Clock
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2006) 14, 729–738 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1018-4813/06 $30.00 www.nature.com/ejhg REVIEW Molecular genetics of the fruit-fly circadian clock Ezio Rosato1, Eran Tauber1 and Charalambos P Kyriacou*,1 1Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK The circadian clock percolates through every aspect of behaviour and physiology, and has wide implications for human and animal health. The molecular basis of the Drosophila circadian clock provides a model system that has remarkable similarities to that of mammals. The various cardinal clock molecules in the fly are outlined, and compared to those of their actual and ‘functional’ homologues in the mammal. We also focus on the evolutionary tinkering of these clock genes and compare and contrast the neuronal basis for behavioural rhythms between the two phyla. European Journal of Human Genetics (2006) 14, 729–738. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201547 Keywords: Drosophila; circadian clock; molecular genetics Introduction: clocks and disease same ones that determine the corresponding human 24 h The number of reviews written on biological rhythms in cycle. the past 15 years has been enormous, particularly those on Is there a relationship between circadian clocks and the molecular aspects. So, why are we writing another one disease? In Western societies, about 20% of the population, on Drosophila, and why for a readership of human/medical perhaps more, work in shifts. There are various types of geneticists who must care little or nothing for such a shift-work programmes, but all have the effect of desyn- subject or such an organism? After all, 24 h circadian chronising the workers internal clock to the outside world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neuropeptide Pigment-Dispersing Factor Coordinates Pacemaker Interactions in the Drosophila Circadian System
    The Journal of Neuroscience, September 8, 2004 • 24(36):7951–7957 • 7951 Cellular/Molecular The Neuropeptide Pigment-Dispersing Factor Coordinates Pacemaker Interactions in the Drosophila Circadian System Yiing Lin,1 Gary D. Stormo,1 and Paul H. Taghert2 Departments of 1Genetics and 2Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University Medical School, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 In Drosophila, the neuropeptide pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) is required to maintain behavioral rhythms under constant conditions. To understand how PDF exerts its influence, we performed time-series immunostainings for the PERIOD protein in normal and pdf mutant flies over9dofconstant conditions. Without pdf, pacemaker neurons that normally express PDF maintained two markers of rhythms: that of PERIOD nuclear translocation and its protein staining intensity. As a group, however, they displayed a gradual disper- sion in their phasing of nuclear translocation. A separate group of non-PDF circadian pacemakers also maintained PERIOD nuclear translocation rhythms without pdf but exhibited altered phase and amplitude of PERIOD staining intensity. Therefore, pdf is not required to maintain circadian protein oscillations under constant conditions; however, it is required to coordinate the phase and amplitude of such rhythms among the diverse pacemakers. These observations begin to outline the hierarchy of circadian pacemaker circuitry in the Drosophila brain. Key words: pigment-dispersing factor; circadian rhythm; Drosophila; lateral neurons; nuclear accumulation; period Introduction ally been ascribed to individual cell properties (Michel et al., The organizing principles for the neuronal networks underlying 1993; Welsh et al., 1995; Liu et al., 1997; Herzog et al., 1998). circadian oscillations are essentially unknown. Which cells are Recent evidence, however, suggests that interneuronal commu- the critical oscillators for particular output functions, what is nication may be required to sustain basic molecular rhythms.
    [Show full text]
  • Up-Regulation of PER3 Expression Is Correlated with Better Clinical Outcome in Acute Leukemia
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 35: 6615-6622 (2015) Up-regulation of PER3 Expression Is Correlated with Better Clinical Outcome in Acute Leukemia MING-YU YANG1, PAI-MEI LIN2, HUI-HUA HSIAO3,4, JUI-FENG HSU5, HUGO YOU-HSIEN LIN5,6, CHENG-MING HSU1,7, I-YA CHEN1, SHENG-WEN SU1, YI-CHANG LIU3,4 and SHENG-FUNG LIN3,4 1Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.; 2Department of Nursing, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, R.O.C.; 3Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, R.O.C.; 4Faculty of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, R.O.C.; 5Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, R.O.C.; 6Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, R.O.C.; 7Department of Otolaryngology, Kaoshiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C. Abstract. Background: Altered expression of circadian treatment. Conclusion: Circadian clock genes are altered in clock genes has been linked to various types of cancer. This patients with acute leukemia and up-regulation of PER3 is study aimed to investigate whether these genes are also correlated with a better clinical outcome. altered in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL). Materials and Methods: The expression Acute leukemia comprises about 20,000 cancer diagnoses profiles of nine circadian clock genes of peripheral blood and 10,000 deaths in the United States each year (1).
    [Show full text]
  • TIMELESS in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review †
    Extended Abstract TIMELESS in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review † Piermichele Saracino 1,*, Claudia Arena 1, Marco Mascitti 2, Andrea Santarelli 2, Vera Panzarella 3 and Lucio Lo Russo 1 1 Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy; [email protected] (C.A.); [email protected] (L.L.R.) 2 Department of Clinical Specialistic and Dental Sciences, Marche Polytechnic, 60131 Ancona, Italy; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (A.S.) 3 Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +393332016671 † Presented at the XV National and III International Congress of the Italian Society of Oral Pathology and Medicine (SIPMO), Bari, Italy, 17–19 October 2019. Published: 11 December 2019 TIMELESS is one of the main circadian genes. Different roles are described, such as replication fork stability, cell survival after DNA damage or replication stress by promoting DNA repair. TIMELESS deficiency increases genomic instability and its reduction increases Rad51 and Rad52 foci formation during S phase [1]. TIMELESS and PARP1 operate in a complex to mediate DNA repair. It is also showed that alteration in circadian rhythm is associated with cancer development and tumor progression, such as chronic myeloid leukemia, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer [2]. We wanted to summarize the role of TIMELESS in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. To do so, we performed a literature review using these keywords: TIMELESS [All Fields] AND (“neoplasms” [MeSH Terms] OR “neoplasms” [All Fields] OR “cancer” [All Fields]).
    [Show full text]
  • Circadian Rhythms from Flies to Human
    insight review articles Circadian rhythms from flies to human Satchidananda Panda*†, John B. Hogenesch† & Steve A. Kay*† *Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) †Genomics Institute of Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California 92121, USA In this era of jet travel, our body ‘remembers’ the previous time zone, such that when we travel, our sleep–wake pattern, mental alertness, eating habits and many other physiological processes temporarily suffer the consequences of time displacement until we adjust to the new time zone. Although the existence of a circadian clock in humans had been postulated for decades, an understanding of the molecular mechanisms has required the full complement of research tools. To gain the initial insights into circadian mechanisms, researchers turned to genetically tractable model organisms such as Drosophila. he rotation of the presence of an internal Earth causes predict- pacemaker1. Once emerged, adult able changes in light flies restrict flight, foraging and and temperature in mating activities to the day (or our natural environ- subjective day), while they tend to Tment. Accordingly, natural selec- ‘sleep’ (that is, they are relatively tion has favoured the evolution unresponsive to sensory stimuli of circadian (from the Latin and exhibit rest homeostasis2,3) circa, meaning ‘about’, and dies, during the night. meaning ‘day’) clocks or Circadian regulation of such biological clocks — endogenous physiology and behaviour results cellular mechanisms for keeping track of time. These from coordination of the activities of multiple tissues and clocks impart a survival advantage by enabling an cell types. An example is the consolidation of feeding behav- organism to anticipate daily environmental changes and iour to the day phase, which involves regulation of the sensi- thus tailor its behaviour and physiology to the appropriate tivity of chemosensory organs to locate food, activity of the time of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • PERIOD-Controlled Deadenylation of the Timeless Transcript in the Drosophila Circadian Clock
    PERIOD-controlled deadenylation of the timeless transcript in the Drosophila circadian clock Brigitte Grimaa, Christian Papina, Béatrice Martina, Elisabeth Chélota, Prishila Ponienb, Eric Jacquetb, and François Rouyera,1 aInstitut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; and bInstitut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France Edited by Michael Rosbash, Howard Hughes Medical Institute/Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, and approved February 7, 2019 (received for review August 21, 2018) The Drosophila circadian oscillator relies on a negative transcriptional length affects numerous transcripts and contributes to the os- feedback loop, in which the PERIOD (PER) and TIMELESS (TIM) pro- cillations of the corresponding protein levels (23, 24). A key teins repress the expression of their own gene by inhibiting the ac- player in regulating poly(A) length is the CCR4–NOT complex tivity of the CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) transcription factors. A (25), which contains two deadenylase components encoded by series of posttranslational modifications contribute to the oscillations the Pop2 (homolog of Schizosaccharomyces pombe caf1) and twin of the PER and TIM proteins but few posttranscriptional mechanisms (homolog of S. pombe ccr4) genes in flies (26). In this study, we have been described that affect mRNA stability. Here we report that reveal an example of the regulation of mRNA oscillations of a down-regulation of the POP2 deadenylase, a key component of the core clock gene, timeless, through the control of the poly- CCR4–NOT deadenylation complex, alters behavioral rhythms. Down- adenylation of its mRNA by the POP2 deadenylase.
    [Show full text]
  • Widespread Seasonal Gene Expression Reveals Annual Differences in Human Immunity and Physiology
    ARTICLE Received 9 Sep 2014 | Accepted 23 Mar 2015 | Published 12 May 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8000 OPEN Widespread seasonal gene expression reveals annual differences in human immunity and physiology Xaquin Castro Dopico1,*, Marina Evangelou1,*, Ricardo C. Ferreira1, Hui Guo1, Marcin L. Pekalski1, Deborah J. Smyth1, Nicholas Cooper1, Oliver S. Burren1, Anthony J. Fulford2, Branwen J. Hennig2, Andrew M. Prentice2, Anette-G. Ziegler3, Ezio Bonifacio4, Chris Wallace1,5,** & John A. Todd1,** Seasonal variations are rarely considered a contributing component to human tissue function or health, although many diseases and physiological process display annual periodicities. Here we find more than 4,000 protein-coding mRNAs in white blood cells and adipose tissue to have seasonal expression profiles, with inverted patterns observed between Europe and Oceania. We also find the cellular composition of blood to vary by season, and these changes, which differ between the United Kingdom and The Gambia, could explain the gene expression periodicity. With regards to tissue function, the immune system has a profound pro- inflammatory transcriptomic profile during European winter, with increased levels of soluble IL-6 receptor and C-reactive protein, risk biomarkers for cardiovascular, psychiatric and autoimmune diseases that have peak incidences in winter. Circannual rhythms thus require further exploration as contributors to various aspects of human physiology and disease. 1 JDRF/Wellcome Trust Diabetes and Inflammation Laboratory, Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK. 2 MRC International Nutrition Group at MRC Unit The Gambia & London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
    [Show full text]