Susceptibilities of Candida Albicans Mouth Isolates to Antifungal Agents, Essentials Oils and Mouth Rinses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Susceptibilities of Candida Albicans Mouth Isolates to Antifungal Agents, Essentials Oils and Mouth Rinses Mycopathologia DOI 10.1007/s11046-012-9520-4 Susceptibilities of Candida albicans Mouth Isolates to Antifungal Agents, Essentials Oils and Mouth Rinses Sara Carvalhinho • Ana Margarida Costa • Ana Cla´udia Coelho • Euge´nio Martins • Ana Sampaio Received: 24 June 2011 / Accepted: 2 January 2012 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract Forty Candida albicans strains isolated DD and the Etest was 100% for amphotericin and from patient’s mouth with fixed orthodontic appliances fluconazole. One isolate was resistant to econazole were analyzed to their susceptibilities to antifungal (2.5%) and the other to ketoconazole (2.5%). Econa- agents, mouth rinses and essential oils. Susceptibility zole and ketoconazole had the highest percentages of to fluconazole, econazole, miconazole and ketocona- susceptible dose dependent (SDD), 55 and 95%, zole, amphotericin B and nystatin was assessed by the respectively. Regarding to the susceptibility isolates disk diffusion (DD) method based on the Clinical and profile, seven phenotypes were detected, and the 3 Laboratory Standards Institute M44-A protocol, and more represented (90% of the isolates) of them were by Etest (fluconazole and amphotericin B). The SDD to one, two or three azoles. The study of mouth susceptibilities to mouth rinses and essential oils were rinses showed a high variability of efficacy against also determined by the DD technique. All isolates C. albicans. The results showed that the isolates tested were susceptible (S) to amphotericin B, nystatin susceptibility to essential oils differed (P \ 0.05). The and fluconazole. The overall concordance between the profile activity was: cinnamon [ laurel [ mint [ euca- lyptus [ rosemary [ lemon [ myrrh [ tangerine. The main finding was that the susceptibility to cinnamon and S. Carvalhinho Á A. M. Costa Á A. Sampaio laurel varied among the three more representative Department of Biology and Environment, University antifungal phenotypes (P \ 0.05). The susceptibility of Tra´s-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), PO Box 1013, 5001-911 Vila Real, Portugal of econazole-SDD isolates to cinnamon and lemon was higher than those of the econazole-S yeasts (P \ 0.05). S. Carvalhinho Á A. Sampaio (&) In contrast, econazole-SDD isolates were less affected Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro- by laurel than econazole-S counterparts (P \ 0.05). Environment and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Universidade de Tra´s-os-Montes e Alto Douro, PO Box 1013, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal Keywords Candida albicans Á Susceptibility Á e-mail: [email protected] Antifungal Á Essential oils Á Mouth rinses A. C. Coelho Department of Veterinary Sciences, Centre for Animal and Veterinary Science (CECAV), UTAD, Introduction PO Box 1013, 5001-911 Vila Real, Portugal The yeast Candida albicans is a commensal organism E. Martins Faculty of Dentistry, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Manuel frequently found in the oral cavity [1] that can cause Pereira da Silva, 4200-393 Oporto, Portugal opportunistic infections when some predisposing 123 Mycopathologia factors are present among the immunodeficiency, appliances who had attended a dental clinic, using the endocrine disorders, age extremes, radiotherapy, anti- medium CHROMagarTM Candida. The green colo- biotic therapies, transplants, malignant diseases and nies, presumptively identified as C. albicans, were the use of orthodontic appliances [2–5]. The most purified and cryo-preserved (-80°C). The identifica- common treatment is the use of antifungal agents, such tion of the isolates were confirmed based on pheno- as azoles (fluconazole, itraconazole, miconazole and typic features, such as their macro- and micro- ketoconazole) and polyenes (amphotericin B or nys- morphology, fermentation of D-glucose, assimilation tatin). The control of the infections caused by Candida of carbohydrates D-galactose, maltose, sucrose, cello- faces several problems, including the limited number biose, trehalose, raffinose, melezitose, soluble starch, of effective antifungal agents, their high toxicity and L-arabinose and D-glucosamine, formation of hyphae/ costs, the recurrence of the infection and, mainly, the pseudohyphae [18], chlamydospore production [19] increasing resistance to them [6, 7]. and germ tube formation [20]. In general, oral C. albicans isolates have high levels of susceptibilities to a range of antifungal agents [8], but Antifungal Susceptibility Tests some studies reported high levels of azoles resistance in C. albicans strains isolated from the throat and mouth Disk diffusion (DD) testing of amphotericin B, nysta- [9, 10]. The use of some mouth wash solutions to control tin, ketoconazole, econazole, fluconazole and mico- microbial mouth growth might represent a valid alter- nazole was performed as described by CLSI guidelines native to topical use of antifungal substances. In vitro (M44-A protocol [21]) and [22] except the use of studies provided evidence that chlorhexidine digluco- methylene blue at 0.5 lg/ml. Amphotericin B (10 lg), nate (CHX) was fungicidal [11, 12]. Additionally, nystatin (50 lg), ketoconazole (15 lg), econazole mouth rinses may contain alcohol or other compounds (10 lg), fluconazole (25 lg) and miconazole (10 lg) that could significantly affect their antimicrobial action were from Neo-sensitabsTM ROSCOÒ. Agar plates (90- [13]. Among those compounds, plant extracts and mm diameter) containing Mueller–Hinton (MH) agar essential oils are used. Due to their antibiotic properties, (Difco Laboratories) supplemented with 2% glucose essential oils use in the pharmaceutical and food were inoculated with yeast cells, previously suspended industry had been generalized, constituting an alterna- in a saline solution (0.85%) with the turbidity 0.5 in a tive to the use of antimicrobials [14]. Also, the growing McFarland scale. The plates were incubated at resistance of C. albicans to antifungal agents stimulated 36 ± 1°C for 24 h. After 24 h cultivation, the inhib- the research of new therapeutic alternatives, like the use itory diameter zone (dz) was measured [23]. The of essential oils [15–17]. interpretative criteria for fluconazole according to This study aims to test the susceptibility of C. CLSI guidelines [21] were: susceptible (S) C19 mm; albicans isolates from patients with orthodontic susceptible dose dependent (SDD) 18–15 mm and appliances, to (1) different antifungals (fluconazole, resistant (R) B14 mm. For the other antifungal agents, miconazole, econazole, ketoconazole, nystatin and we followed the manufacture’s interpretation: keto- amphotericin B); (2) mouth rinses and essential oils conazole (S C 28 mm; SDD 27–21 mm and R B 20 (lemon, eucalyptus, myrrh, cinnamon, laurel, mint, mm), econazole (S C 20 mm; SDD 19–12 mm and rosemary and tangerine) efficacies against the same R B 11 mm), miconazole (S C 20 mm; SDD 19–12 isolates; and (3) to search for possible relations among mm and R B 11 mm), amphotericin B (S C 15 mm; the isolates susceptibilities to antifungal drugs, essen- SDD 14–10 mm and R \ 10 mm) and nystatin tial oils and mouth rinses. (S C 15 mm; SDD 14–10 mm and R B no zone). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for fluconazole and amphotericin B was also determined Materials and Methods by the Etest method (ET), using the ET strips (AB BIODISK) with the concentration range from 0.002 to Origin of C. albicans Isolates 32 lg/ml for amphotericin B and 0.016–256 lg/ml for fluconazole. We used the MH agar to perform the test, Forty isolates of C. albicans used in this study were with 2% glucose. The inoculated suspension was obtained from 25 patients using fixed orthodontic treated as for DD testing. The interpretative MIC 123 Mycopathologia breakpoints were recommended by the manufacture: fruits peal, myrrh oil from the plant resin and fluconazole (S B 8 lg/ml and R C 64 lg/ml) and cinnamon essential oil from bark and leaves. For the amphotericin (S B 1 lg/ml and R C 4 lg/ml). susceptibility tests, 15 ll of each essential oil was put on blank disks (6-mm diameter), allowed to dry and Quality Control placed in a MH plate, previously inoculated with a 0.5 McFarland yeast suspension. The plates were incu- Quality control (QC) for DD and ET was performed by bated at 36 ± 1°C for 24–48 h, and dz (mm) read. using C. albicans ATCC 90028 and Candida parapsi- The seven commercial mouthwashes tested varied losis ATCC 22019 [22]. These species were included in their composition, namely in the main active in all runs, and the results were within published compounds (chlorhexidine digluconate-CHX, alcohol limits. or hexetidine-HEX) and their concentration (Table 1): five had CHX with (n = 2) or without alcohol Essential Oils and Mouthwashes Susceptibility (n = 3), one had HEX and the last only alcohol. They Tests also differ in the type of the excipients. For the susceptibility test, the same procedure was followed All essential oils were obtained from one standard for essential oils. Additionally to C. albicans isolates commercial supplier and derived from plants whose (n = 40), the two ATCC yeasts were also tested. extracts or active substances are frequently found in toothpastes. The plants belongs to 5 families: Laura- Data Analysis ceae, Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume (cinnamon) and Laurus nobilis L. (laurel); Rutaceae, Citrus To test whether mouthwashes or essential oils affect limonum L. (lemon) and Citrus reticulata Blanco yeast growth (dz), we used the Wilcoxon matched pair (tangerine/mandarin); Lamiaceae, Mentha piperita L. test. The phenotypes and the susceptibility classifica- (mint) and Rosmarinus officinalis L. (rosemary); tion of the isolates to the antifungals were compared Burseraceae, Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. against each essential oil and mouthwash, by the non- (myrrh); and Myrtaceae, Eucalyptus globulus Labill parametric Kruskal–Wallis, for multiple independent (blue gum eucalyptus). The rosemary, mint, laurel and groups, or Mann–Whitney’s, for two independent eucalyptus essential oils were obtained from the leaves groups, tests. All analyses were computed by STAT- of their plants, the lemon and tangerine oils from the ISTICA version 9.1.
Recommended publications
  • Tonsillopharyngitis - Acute (1 of 10)
    Tonsillopharyngitis - Acute (1 of 10) 1 Patient presents w/ sore throat 2 EVALUATION Yes EXPERT Are there signs of REFERRAL complication? No 3 4 EVALUATION Is Group A Beta-hemolytic Yes DIAGNOSIS Streptococcus (GABHS) • Rapid antigen detection test infection suspected? (RADT) • roat culture No TREATMENT EVALUATION No A Supportive management Is GABHS confi rmed? B Pharmacological therapy (Non-GABHS) Yes 5 TREATMENT A EVALUATE RESPONSEMIMS Supportive management TO THERAPY C Pharmacological therapy • Antibiotics Poor/No Good D Surgery, if recurrent or complicated response response REASSESS PATIENT COMPLETE THERAPY & REVIEW THE DIAGNOSIS© Not all products are available or approved for above use in all countries. Specifi c prescribing information may be found in the latest MIMS. B269 © MIMS Pediatrics 2020 Tonsillopharyngitis - Acute (2 of 10) 1 ACUTE TONSILLOPHARYNGITIS • Infl ammation of the tonsils & pharynx • Etiologies include bacterial (group A β-hemolytic streptococcus, Haemophilus infl uenzae, Fusobacterium sp, etc) & viral (infl uenza, adenovirus, coronavirus, rhinovirus, etc) pathogens • Sore throat is the most common presenting symptom in older children TONSILLOPHARYNGITIS 2 EVALUATION FOR COMPLICATIONS • Patients w/ sore throat may have deep neck infections including epiglottitis, peritonsillar or retropharyngeal abscess • Examine for signs of upper airway obstruction Signs & Symptoms of Sore roat w/ Complications • Trismus • Inability to swallow liquids • Increased salivation or drooling • Peritonsillar edema • Deviation of uvula
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • National OTC Medicines List
    National OTC Medicines List ‐ DraŌ 01 DRAFT National OTC Medicines List Draft 01 Ministry of Public Health of Lebanon This list was prepared under the guidance of His Excellency Minister Waêl Abou Faour andDRAFT the supervision of the Director General Dr. Walid Ammar. Editors Rita KARAM, Pharm D. PhD. Myriam WATFA, Pharm D Ghassan HAMADEH, MD.CPE FOREWORD According to the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM), Over-the-counter (OTC) drugs are medicines that are accessible to patients in pharmacies, based on criteria set to safeguard patients’ safety. Due to their therapeutic class, these medicines could be dispensed without physician’s intervention for diagnostic, treatment initiation or maintenance purposes. Moreover, their dosage, treatment period and Package Insert Leaflet should be suitable for OTC classification. The packaging size should be in accordance with the dosage and treatment period. According to ArticleDRAFT 43 of the Law No.367 issued in 1994 related to the pharmacy practice, and the amendment of Articles 46 and 47 by Law No.91 issued in 2010, pharmacists do not have the right to dispense any medicine that is not requested by a unified prescription, unless the medicine is mentioned in a list which is established by pharmacists and physicians’ syndicates. In this regard, the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) developed the National OTC Medicines List, and presentedit in a scientific, objective, reliable, and accessible listing. The OTC List was developed by a team of pharmacists and physicians from the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH). In order to ensure a safe and effective self- medicationat the pharmacy level, several pharmaceutical categories (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 1/41
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 ATC code ATC group / Active substance (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit DDD/1000/ day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 167,8985 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0738 A01AB09 Miconazole (O) 7088 g 0,2 g 0,0738 A01AB12 Hexetidine (O) 1951200 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+ Benzocaine (dental) 30200 pieces A01AB82 Demeclocycline+ Triamcinolone (dental) 680 g A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+ Thymol (dental) 3094 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+ Cetylpyridinium chloride (gingival) 227150 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+ Cetrimide (O) 30900 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate (O) 864720 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+ Chamomille extract (O) 370080 g A01AD90 Lidocaine+ Paraformaldehyde (dental) 405 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 47,1312 A02A ANTACIDS 1,0133 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 1,0133 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 811120 pieces 10 pieces 0,1689 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 3101974 ml 50 ml 0,1292 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+ Magnesium carbonate (O) 3434232 pieces 10 pieces 0,7152 DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 46,1179 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 2,3855 A02BA02 Ranitidine (O) 340327,5 g 0,3 g 2,3624 A02BA02 Ranitidine (P) 3318,25 g 0,3 g 0,0230 A02BC Proton pump inhibitors 43,7324 A02BC01 Omeprazole
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,265,775 B2 Lyons Et Al
    US009265775B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,265,775 B2 Lyons et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Feb. 23, 2016 (54) PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS 4,281,654 A 8, 1981 Shell et al. 4,285,987 A 8/1981 Ayer et al. 4,303,637 A 12/1981 Shell et al. (71) Applicant: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA (US) 4,304.765 A 12/1981 Shell et al. 4,327,725 A 5, 1982 Cortese (72) Inventors: Robert T. Lyons, Laguna Hills, CA 4,383,992 A 5/1983 Lipari (US); James N. Chang, Newport Beach, 4,396,625 A 8/1983 Yamamori et al. CA (US); John T. Trogden, Villa Park, 4.425,346 A 1/1984 Horlington et al. 4,474,451 A 10, 1984 Mizokami CA (US); Scott Whitcup, Laguna Hills, 4,478,818 A 10, 1984 Shell et al. CA (US) 4,494,274 A 1/1985 Thurlow 4,521,210 A 6/1985 Wong (73) Assignee: Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA (US) 4,599,353 A 7, 1986 Bito 4,649,151 A 3/1987 Dougherty et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 4,656,186 A 4, 1987 Bommer et al. 4,668,506 A 5, 1987 Bawa patent is extended or adjusted under 35 4.675,338 A 6, 1987 Bommer et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 4,693,885 A 9, 1987 Bommer et al. 4,712,500 A 12/1987 Montandon This patent is Subject to a terminal dis 4,713,446 A 12/1987 DeVore et al.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 10.0 Index 1. General Notices
    EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 10.0 Index 1. General notices......................................................................... 3 2.2.66. Detection and measurement of radioactivity........... 119 2.1. Apparatus ............................................................................. 15 2.2.7. Optical rotation................................................................ 26 2.1.1. Droppers ........................................................................... 15 2.2.8. Viscosity ............................................................................ 27 2.1.2. Comparative table of porosity of sintered-glass filters.. 15 2.2.9. Capillary viscometer method ......................................... 27 2.1.3. Ultraviolet ray lamps for analytical purposes............... 15 2.3. Identification...................................................................... 129 2.1.4. Sieves ................................................................................. 16 2.3.1. Identification reactions of ions and functional 2.1.5. Tubes for comparative tests ............................................ 17 groups ...................................................................................... 129 2.1.6. Gas detector tubes............................................................ 17 2.3.2. Identification of fatty oils by thin-layer 2.2. Physical and physico-chemical methods.......................... 21 chromatography...................................................................... 132 2.2.1. Clarity and degree of opalescence of
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
    Updated June 07, 2021 Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Three categories of bulk drug substances: • Category 1: Bulk Drug Substances Under Evaluation • Category 2: Bulk Drug Substances that Raise Significant Safety Risks • Category 3: Bulk Drug Substances Nominated Without Adequate Support Updates to Categories of Substances Nominated for the 503B Bulk Drug Substances List1 • Add the following entry to category 2 due to serious safety concerns of mutagenicity, cytotoxicity, and possible carcinogenicity when quinacrine hydrochloride is used for intrauterine administration for non- surgical female sterilization: 2,3 o Quinacrine Hydrochloride for intrauterine administration • Revision to category 1 for clarity: o Modify the entry for “Quinacrine Hydrochloride” to “Quinacrine Hydrochloride (except for intrauterine administration).” • Revision to category 1 to correct a substance name error: o Correct the error in the substance name “DHEA (dehydroepiandosterone)” to “DHEA (dehydroepiandrosterone).” 1 For the purposes of the substance names in the categories, hydrated forms of the substance are included in the scope of the substance name. 2 Quinacrine HCl was previously reviewed in 2016 as part of FDA’s consideration of this bulk drug substance for inclusion on the 503A Bulks List. As part of this review, the Division of Bone, Reproductive and Urologic Products (DBRUP), now the Division of Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology (DUOG), evaluated the nomination of quinacrine for intrauterine administration for non-surgical female sterilization and recommended that quinacrine should not be included on the 503A Bulks List for this use. This recommendation was based on the lack of information on efficacy comparable to other available methods of female sterilization and serious safety concerns of mutagenicity, cytotoxicity and possible carcinogenicity in use of quinacrine for this indication and route of administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2013 1/44
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2013 DDD/1000/ ATC code ATC group / INN (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 146,8152 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0760 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0760 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0760 A01AB09 Miconazole(O) 7139,2 g 0,2 g 0,0760 A01AB12 Hexetidine(O) 1541120 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+Benzocaine(C) 23900 pieces A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+Thymol(dental) 2639 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+Cetylpyridinium chloride(gingival) 179340 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+Cetrimide(O) 23565 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate(O) 824240 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+Chamomille extract(O) 317140 g A01AD86 Lidocaine+Eugenol(gingival) 1128 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 35,6598 A02A ANTACIDS 0,9596 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 0,9596 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium hydroxide(O) 591680 pieces 10 pieces 0,1261 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium hydroxide(O) 1998558 ml 50 ml 0,0852 A02AD82 Aluminium aminoacetate+Magnesium oxide(O) 463540 pieces 10 pieces 0,0988 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+Magnesium carbonate(O) 3049560 pieces 10 pieces 0,6497 A02AF Antacids with antiflatulents Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium A02AF80 1000790 ml hydroxide+Simeticone(O) DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 34,7001 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 3,5364 A02BA02 Ranitidine(O) 494352,3 g 0,3 g 3,5106 A02BA02 Ranitidine(P)
    [Show full text]
  • ( 12 ) United States Patent
    US010266485B2 (12 ) United States Patent (10 ) Patent No. : US 10 , 266 , 485 B2 Benenato ( 45 ) Date of Patent: * Apr. 23, 2019 ( 54 ) COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ( 2013. 01 ) ; C07C 227/ 16 (2013 . 01 ) ; C07C INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY OF 227/ 18 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07C 229 / 16 (2013 . 01 ) ; THERAPEUTIC AGENTS C07C 233 / 36 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07C 235 / 10 (2013 .01 ) ; C07C 255 /24 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; C07C (71 ) Applicant: Moderna TX , Inc ., Cambridge , MA 271/ 20 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; C07C 275 / 14 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; (US ) C07C 279 /12 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07C 279 / 24 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; C07C 279 /28 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07C ( 72 ) Inventor: Kerry E . Benenato , Sudbury , MA (US ) 279 / 32 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; C07C 311 / 05 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; C07C 335 / 08 (2013 . 01 ) ; C070 207 / 27 (73 ) Assignee : ModernaTX , Inc. , Cambridge, MA ( 2013 .01 ) ; CO7D 233 / 72 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; C07D (US ) 249 /04 (2013 .01 ) ; C07D 263 / 20 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07D 265 / 33 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07D 271 / 06 ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07D 271/ 10 (2013 .01 ) ; C07D patent is extended or adjusted under 35 277 / 38 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; C07F 9 / 091 ( 2013 .01 ) ; U . S . C . 154 ( b ) by 0 days . CO7K 14 /505 ( 2013. 01 ) ; A61K 9 /1271 This patent is subject to a terminal dis (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 48 / 00 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07C claimer . 2601/ 02 (2017 .05 ) ; C07C 2601 / 04 ( 2017 . 05 ) ; C07C 2601/ 14 ( 2017 .05 ) ; C07C 2601 / 18 (21 ) Appl . No. : 16 / 005 , 286 (2017 . 05 ) (58 ) Field of Classification Search (22 ) Filed : Jun . 11 , 2018 CPC .. A61K 39 /00 ; A61K 51 /08 ; CO7K 14 /81 ; C07H 21 /00 (65 ) Prior Publication Data USPC .
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphthous Ulcers (Recurrent)
    Oral health Aphthous ulcers (recurrent) Search date August 2006 Stephen Porter and Crispian Scully CBE QUESTIONS What are the effects of treatments for recurrent aphthous ulcers?. 2 INTERVENTIONS TREATMENT To be covered in future updates Likely to be beneficial Barrier techniques Chlorhexidine and similar agents . 2 Laser Low intensity ultrasound Unknown effectiveness Novel toothpastes Analgesics (Local) New . 5 Other drug treatments Carbenoxolone mouthwash New . 3 Corticosteroids (topical). 4 Tetracycline antibiotic mouthwash New . 5 Key Points • Most people with recurrent aphthous ulcers develop a few ulcers less than 1 cm in diameter, that heal after 5–14 days without scarring. The causes are unknown, but risks of recurrence may decrease if the person gives up smoking. Local physical trauma may trigger ulcers in susceptible people. In 10% of sufferers, lesions are more than 1 cm in diameter and can cause scarring. • Chlorhexidine mouth rinses may reduce the severity and pain of ulceration, although studies have reported inco- clusive results about whether the incidence of new ulcers is reduced. • We don't know whether topical corticosteroids reduce the number of new ulcers, but they may reduce pain and increase healing of ulcers without causing notable adverse effects. • We don't know whether carbenoxolone gel or mouthwash, local analgesics , or tetracycline mouthwash work, as few well planned studies were found DEFINITION Recurrent aphthous ulcers are superficial, rounded, painful mouth ulcers usually occurring in recur- rent bouts at intervals of a few days to a few months in otherwise well people. [1] INCIDENCE/ The point prevalence of recurrent aphthous ulcers in Swedish adults has been reported as 2%.
    [Show full text]