Cost-Benefit Analysis of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology* NREL/JA-540-40969 Posted with permission. WEVA-2006-053 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology* Tony Markel** and Andrew Simpson*** Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) have emerged as a promising technology that uses electricity to displace petroleum consumption in the vehicle fleet. This paper presents a comparison of the costs (vehicle purchase costs and energy costs) and benefits (reduced petroleum consumption) of PHEVs relative to hybrid electric and conventional vehicles. A detailed simulation model is used to predict petroleum reductions and costs of PHEV designs compared to a baseline midsize sedan. The analysis finds that petroleum reductions exceeding 45% per vehicle can be achieved by PHEVs equipped with 20 mi (32 km) or more of energy storage. However, the long-term incremental costs of these vehicles are projected to exceed US$8,000. A simple economic analysis is used to show that high petroleum prices and low battery costs are needed to make a compelling business case for PHEVs in the absence of other incentives. However, the large petroleum reduction potential of PHEVs provides strong justification for governmental support to accelerate the deployment of PHEV technology. Keywords: Plug-In Hybrid; Hybrid Electric Vehicles; Battery, Modeling, Simulation; Energy Security. provide a fair comparison between vehicles [2]. By this 1. INTRODUCTION TO PLUG-IN HYBRID definition, a PHEV20 can drive 20 mi (32 km) ELECTRIC VEHICLES all-electrically on the test cycle before the first engine Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles have recently turn-on. However, this all-electric definition discounts emerged as a promising alternative that uses electricity PHEVs that might continue to operate in CD-mode after to displace a significant fraction of fleet petroleum the first engine turn-on. Therefore, the authors use a consumption [1]. A plug-in hybrid electric vehicle definition of PHEVx that is more appropriately related (PHEV) is a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) with the to petroleum displacement. By this definition, a ability to recharge its electrochemical energy storage PHEV20 contains enough useable energy storage in its with electricity from an off-board source (such as the battery to displace 20 mi (32 km) of petroleum electric utility grid). The vehicle can then drive in a consumption on the standard test cycle. Note that this charge-depleting (CD) mode that reduces the system’s definition does not imply all-electric capability since state-of-charge (SOC), thereby using electricity to the vehicle operation will ultimately be determined by displace liquid fuel that would otherwise have been component power ratings and their control strategy, as consumed. This liquid fuel is typically petroleum well as the actual in-use driving cycle. (gasoline or diesel), although PHEVs can also use alternatives such as biofuels or hydrogen. PHEV 1.2 Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Potential batteries typically have larger capacity than those in The potential for PHEVs to displace fleet petroleum HEVs so as to increase the potential for petroleum consumption derives from several factors. First, PHEVs displacement. are potentially well-matched to motorists’ driving habits—in particular, the distribution of distances 1.1 Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Terminology traveled each day. Fig. 1 shows the US vehicle daily Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are characterized by mileage distribution based on data collected in the 1995 a “PHEVx” notation, where “x” typically denotes the National Personal Transportation Survey (NPTS) [3]. vehicle’s all-electric range (AER) – defined as the Clearly, the majority of daily mileages are relatively distance in miles that a fully-charged PHEV can drive short, with 50% of days being less than 30 mi (48 km). before needing to operate its engine. The California Air Fig. 1 also shows the Utility Factor (UF) curve for the Resources Board uses the Urban Dynamometer Driving 1995 NPTS data. For a certain distance D, the UF is the Schedule (UDDS) to measure the AER of PHEVs and fraction of total vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT) that occurs within the first D miles of daily travel. For a ** National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd. distance of 30 mi (48 km), the UF is approximately Golden, CO 80401, e-mail:[email protected] 40%. This means that an all-electric PHEV30 can *** Tesla Motors (formerly at NREL), 1050 Bing Street, San Carlos CA 94070, e-mail:[email protected] displace petroleum consumption equivalent to 40% of *This work has been authored by an employee or employees of the Midwest Research Institute under Contract No. DE-AC36-99GO10337 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes WEVA Journal, Vol.1, 2006 1 VMT, (assuming the vehicle is fully recharged each 2. MODELING PHEV PETROLEUM day). Similarly, an all-electric PHEV60 can displace CONSUMPTION AND COST about 60%. This low-daily-mileage characteristic is why PHEVs have potential to displace a large fraction The reduction of per-vehicle petroleum consumption of per-vehicle petroleum consumption. in a PHEV results from two factors: 1. CD-mode petroleum displacement due to battery 100 energy capacity of the vehicle Daily Distance Distribution 2. Charge-sustaining (CS)-mode fuel-efficiency Utility Factor 80 improvement due to hybridization or battery power capability of the vehicle. 60 HEVs do not have a CD-mode and are only able to 40 realize savings via the CS-mode. For a PHEVx, these Probability (%) two factors can be combined mathematically as 20 follows:. FC FC 0 PHEVx []1−= ()xUF CS (1) 0 20 40 60 80 100 FC FC Daily Distance (mi) CV CV Fig. 1: Daily mileage distribution for US motorists based where FCPHEVx is the UF-weighted fuel consumption of on the 1995 National Personal Travel Survey the PHEVx, FCCV is the fuel consumption of the reference conventional (non-hybrid) vehicle, and FCCS However, for PHEVs to displace fleet petroleum is the PHEVx’s CS-mode fuel consumption. Note that consumption, they must penetrate the market and this expression becomes approximate for PHEVs extrapolate these savings to the fleet level. PHEVs are without all-electric capability because use of the utility very marketable in that they combine the beneficial factor in this way assumes that no petroleum is attributes of HEVs and battery electric vehicles (BEVs) consumed in the first x miles of travel. while mitigating their disadvantages. Production HEVs 100% PHEV60 achieve high fuel economy, but they are still designed 90% PHEV40 for petroleum fuels and do not enable fuel 80% PHEV20 HEV substitution/flexibility. PHEVs, however, are true 70% fuel-flexible vehicles that can run on petroleum or 60% electrical energy. BEVs do not require any petroleum, 50% but are constrained by battery technologies resulting in Prius (Corolla) 40% Escape limited driving ranges, significant battery costs, and Civic Consumption (%) 30% Highlander Challenging Region lengthy recharging times. PHEVs have a smaller battery Accord 20% for HEV Technology which mitigates battery cost and recharging time while Total Reduction in Petroleum Vue the onboard petroleum fuel tank provides driving range 10% equivalent to conventional and hybrid vehicles. This 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% combination of attributes is building a strong demand Reduction in CS-mode Petroleum Consumption (%) for PHEVs, as evidenced by the recently launched Plug-In Partners Campaign [4]. Fig. 2: Potential per-vehicle reduction of petroleum consumption in PHEVs PHEVs have the potential to come to market, penetrate the fleet, and achieve meaningful petroleum Fig. 2 uses Eq. 1 to compare the petroleum reduction displacement relatively quickly. Few competing of various PHEV designs. We see there are a variety of technologies offer this potential combined rate and ways to achieve a target level of petroleum reduction. timing of reduction in fleet petroleum consumption [5]. For example, a 50% reduction is achieved by an HEV However, PHEV technology is not without its with 50% reduced fuel consumption, a PHEV20 with challenges. Energy storage system cost, volume, and 30% CS-mode reduction, and by a PHEV40 with 0% life are major obstacles that must be overcome for these CS-mode reduction (this last example is unlikely, since vehicles to succeed. Given that HEVs are succeeding in PHEVs will show CS-mode improvement due to the market, the question relevant to PHEVs is, “What hybridization, notwithstanding the increase in vehicle incremental petroleum reductions can be achieved at mass from the larger battery). To demonstrate the what incremental costs?” These factors will critically feasible range of CS-mode reduction, Fig. 2 compares affect the marketability of PHEVs through their several contemporary HEVs to their conventional purchase price and cost of ownership. This paper counterparts. The “mild” HEV Saturn Vue achieves a presents the results of a study designed to evaluate this modest reduction of less than 20%. The “full” HEV cost-benefit tradeoff. Toyota Prius (relative to Corolla) achieves the highest percentage reduction (40%) of all HEVs currently on the market although, in addition to the platform 2 WEVA Journal, Vol.1, 2006 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology enhancements employed in production hybrids, it also vehicles (CVs) and HEVs (including PHEVs) so that uses an advanced (Atkinson-cycle) engine technology. side-by-side comparisons can be made. The Note that none of the production HEVs achieve the 50% performance and energy-use models were validated for reduction discussed in the above example, suggesting a Toyota Camry sedan and Honda Civic hybrid. In both that there is an upper limit on the benefit of cases, errors of less than 5% were observed in the hybridization alone.
Recommended publications
  • Vehicle Conversions, Retrofits, and Repowers ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE CONVERSIONS, RETROFITS, and REPOWERS
    What Fleets Need to Know About Alternative Fuel Vehicle Conversions, Retrofits, and Repowers ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE CONVERSIONS, RETROFITS, AND REPOWERS Acknowledgments This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 with Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, the Manager and Operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. This work was made possible through funding provided by National Clean Cities Program Director and DOE Vehicle Technologies Office Deployment Manager Dennis Smith. This publication is part of a series. For other lessons learned from the Clean Cities American Recovery and Reinvestment (ARRA) projects, please refer to the following publications: • American Recovery and Reinvestment Act – Clean Cities Project Awards (DOE/GO-102016-4855 - August 2016) • Designing a Successful Transportation Project – Lessons Learned from the Clean Cities American Recovery and Reinvestment Projects (DOE/GO-102017-4955 - September 2017) Authors Kay Kelly and John Gonzales, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Disclaimer This document is not intended for use as a “how to” guide for individuals or organizations performing a conversion, repower, or retrofit. Instead, it is intended to be used as a guide and resource document for informational purposes only. VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE | cleancities.energy.gov 2 ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLE CONVERSIONS, RETROFITS, AND REPOWERS Table of Contents Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Morgan Ellis Climate Policy Analyst and Clean Cities Coordinator DNREC [email protected] 302.739.9053
    CLEAN TRANSPORTATION IN DELAWARE WILMAPCO’S OUR TOWN CONFERENCE THE PRESENTATION 1) What are alterative fuels? 2) The Fuels 3) What’s Delaware Doing? WHAT ARE ALTERNATIVE FUELED VEHICLES? • “Vehicles that run on a fuel other than traditional petroleum fuels (i.e. gas and diesel)” • Propane • Natural Gas • Electricity • Biodiesel • Ethanol • Hydrogen THERE’S A FUEL FOR EVERY FLEET! DELAWARE’S ALTERNATIVE FUELS • “Vehicles that run on a fuel other than traditional petroleum fuels (i.e. gas and diesel)” • Propane • Natural Gas • Electricity • Biodiesel • Ethanol • Hydrogen THE FUELS PROPANE • By-Product of Natural Gas • Compressed at high pressure to liquefy • Domestic Fuel Source • Great for: • School Busses • Step Vans • Larger Vans • Mid-Sized Vehicles COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS (CNG) • Predominately Methane • Uses existing pipeline distribution system to deliver gas • Good for: • Heavy-Duty Trucks • Passenger cars • School Buses • Waste Management Trucks • DNREC trucks PROPANE AND CNG INFRASTRUCTURE • 8 Propane Autogas Stations • 1 CNG Station • Fleet and Public Access with accounts ELECTRIC VEHICLES • Electricity is considered an alternative fuel • Uses electricity from a power source and stores it in batteries • Two types: • Battery Electric • Plug-in Hybrid • Great for: • Passenger Vehicles EV INFRASTRUCTURE • 61 charging stations in Delaware • At 26 locations • 37,000 Charging Stations in the United States • Three types: • Level 1 • Level 2 • D.C. Fast Charging TYPES OF CHARGING STATIONS Charger Current Type Voltage (V) Charging Primary Use Time Level 1 Alternating 120 V 2 to 5 miles Current (AC) per hour of Residential charge Level 2 AC 240 V 10 to 20 miles Residential per hour of and charge Commercial DC Fast Direct Current 480 V 60 to 80 miles (DC) per 20 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Long-Term Evolving Patterns of Shared Electric
    Experience: Understanding Long-Term Evolving Patterns of Shared Electric Vehicle Networks∗ Guang Wang Xiuyuan Chen Fan Zhang Rutgers University Rutgers University Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced [email protected] [email protected] Technology, CAS [email protected] Yang Wang Desheng Zhang University of Science and Rutgers University Technology of China [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT CCS CONCEPTS Due to the ever-growing concerns on the air pollution and • Networks → Network measurement; Mobile networks; energy security, many cities have started to update their Cyber-physical networks. taxi fleets with electric ones. Although environmentally friendly, the rapid promotion of electric taxis raises prob- KEYWORDS lems to both taxi drivers and governments, e.g., prolonged Electric vehicle; mobility pattern; charging pattern; evolving waiting/charging time, unbalanced utilization of charging experience; shared autonomous vehicle infrastructures and reduced taxi supply due to the long charg- ing time. In this paper, we make the first effort to understand ACM Reference Format: the long-term evolving patterns through a five-year study Guang Wang, Xiuyuan Chen, Fan Zhang, Yang Wang, and Desh- on one of the largest electric taxi networks in the world, i.e., eng Zhang. 2019. Experience: Understanding Long-Term Evolving the Shenzhen electric taxi network in China. In particular, Patterns of Shared Electric Vehicle Networks. In The 25th Annual we perform a comprehensive measurement investigation International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Mo- called ePat to explore the evolving mobility and charging biCom ’19), October 21–25, 2019, Los Cabos, Mexico. ACM, New York, patterns of electric vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • How Practical Are Alternative Fuel Vehicles?
    How Practical Are Alternative Fuel Vehicles? Many of us have likely considered an alternative fuel vehicle at some point in our lives. Balancing the positives and negatives is a tricky process and varies greatly based on our personal situations. However, many of the negatives that previously created hesitancy have changed in recent years. Below, we have outlined a few of the most commonly mentioned negatives regarding the two leading alternative fuel vehicle types: Flex Fuel vehicles and Electric/Hybrid vehicles. Then, you can decide for yourself whether one of these vehicle types are practical for you! Cost – How much does the vehicle cost to purchase and operate? Flex Fuel: Flex Fuel vehicles typically cost about the same as a gasoline vehicle.1 For fuel cost, E85 typically costs slightly less than gasoline, however, due to decreased efficiency has a slightly higher cost per mile than gasoline.2 Overall, a Flex Fuel vehicle is likely to be slightly more expensive than a gasoline counterpart. Electric/Hybrid: This situation varies quite a bit depending on where you live. Electric vehicles and hybrid vehicles often cost considerably more than a conventional gasoline vehicle. For example, a plug-in hybrid will cost around $4000-$8000 more than a conventional model.3 However, there are federal rebates and local rebates that can refund thousands of dollars from the purchase price. Electric/Hybrid vehicles also tend to save money on fuel, with the possibility of saving thousands of dollars over the lifetime of the vehicle.4 Whether these rebates and fuel cost savings will eventually account for the higher purchase price can be estimated with comparison tools.
    [Show full text]
  • EPRI Journal--Driving the Solution: the Plug-In Hybrid Vehicle
    DRIVING THE SOLUTION THE PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLE by Lucy Sanna The Story in Brief As automakers gear up to satisfy a growing market for fuel-efficient hybrid electric vehicles, the next- generation hybrid is already cruis- ing city streets, and it can literally run on empty. The plug-in hybrid charges directly from the electricity grid, but unlike its electric vehicle brethren, it sports a liquid fuel tank for unlimited driving range. The technology is here, the electricity infrastructure is in place, and the plug-in hybrid offers a key to replacing foreign oil with domestic resources for energy indepen- dence, reduced CO2 emissions, and lower fuel costs. DRIVING THE SOLUTION THE PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLE by Lucy Sanna n November 2005, the first few proto­ vide a variety of battery options tailored 2004, more than half of which came from Itype plug­in hybrid electric vehicles to specific applications—vehicles that can imports. (PHEVs) will roll onto the streets of New run 20, 30, or even more electric miles.” With growing global demand, particu­ York City, Kansas City, and Los Angeles Until recently, however, even those larly from China and India, the price of a to demonstrate plug­in hybrid technology automakers engaged in conventional barrel of oil is climbing at an unprece­ in varied environments. Like hybrid vehi­ hybrid technology have been reluctant to dented rate. The added cost and vulnera­ cles on the market today, the plug­in embrace the PHEV, despite growing rec­ bility of relying on a strategic energy hybrid uses battery power to supplement ognition of the vehicle’s potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Gasoline-Electric Hybrid Synergy Drive
    Gasoline-Electric Hybrid Synergy Drive AHV40 Series Foreword In March 2006, Toyota released the Toyota CAMRY gasoline-electric hybrid vehicle in North America. Except where noted in this guide, basic vehicle systems and features for the CAMRY hybrid are the same as those on the conventional, non-hybrid, Toyota CAMRY. To educate and assist emergency responders in the safe handling of the CAMRY hybrid technology, Toyota published this CAMRY hybrid Emergency Response Guide. High voltage electricity powers the electric motor, generator, A/C compressor, and inverter/converter. All other automotive electrical devices such as the headlights, power steering, horn, radio, and gauges are powered from a separate 12 Volts battery. Numerous safeguards have been designed into the CAMRY to help ensure the high voltage, approximately 245 Volts, Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) Hybrid Vehicle (HV) battery pack is kept safe and secure in an accident. Additional topics contained in the guide include: N Toyota CAMRY identification. N Major hybrid component locations and descriptions. By following the information in this guide, dismantlers will be able to handle the CAMRY hybrid-electric vehicle as safely as the dismantling of a conventional gasoline engine automobile. ¤ 2006 Toyota Motor Corporation All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, without the written permission of Toyota Motor Corporation ii Table of Contents About the CAMRY.........................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicles: a Primer on Technology and Selected Policy Issues
    Electric Vehicles: A Primer on Technology and Selected Policy Issues February 14, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46231 SUMMARY R46231 Electric Vehicles: A Primer on Technology and February 14, 2020 Selected Policy Issues Melissa N. Diaz The market for electrified light-duty vehicles (also called passenger vehicles; including passenger Analyst in Energy Policy cars, pickup trucks, SUVs, and minivans) has grown since the 1990s. During this decade, the first contemporary hybrid-electric vehicle debuted on the global market, followed by the introduction of other types of electric vehicles (EVs). By 2018, electric vehicles made up 4.2% of the 16.9 million new light-duty vehicles sold in the United States that year. Meanwhile, charging infrastructure grew in response to rising electric vehicle ownership, increasing from 3,394 charging stations in 2011 to 78,301 in 2019. However, many locations have sparse or no public charging infrastructure. Electric motors and traction battery packs—most commonly made up of lithium-ion battery cells—set EVs apart from internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). The battery pack provides power to the motor that drives the vehicle. At times, the motor acts as a generator, sending electricity back to the battery. The broad categories of EVs can be identified by whether they have an internal combustion engine (i.e., hybrid vehicles) and whether the battery pack can be charged by external electricity (i.e., plug-in electric vehicles). The numerous vehicle technologies further determine characteristics such as fuel economy rating, driving range, and greenhouse gas emissions. EVs can be separated into three broad categories: Hybrid-electric vehicles (HEVs): The internal combustion engine primarily powers the wheels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Toyota Prius Plug-In HEV: a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Car in NREL's Advanced Technology Vehicle Fleet (Fact Sheet), Transp
    The Toyota Prius Plug-in HEV A plug-in hybrid electric car in NREL’s advanced technology vehicle fleet Toyota Prius Plug-in HEV Curb Weight 3278 lb Toyota Prius plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Length 175.5 in. Photo from Atlantic County Utilities Authority, NREL/PIX 18311 Highlights Width 68.7 in. Height 58.7 in. The Toyota Prius plug-in hybrid electric vehicle at the NREL’s advanced vehicle fleet U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Peak Motor Power 80 hp features promising technologies Laboratory (NREL) is part of a worldwide 600-vehicle Motor Location Front to increase efficiency and reduce demonstration project. In partnership with the University emissions—all without sacrificing Engine Power 98 hp of Colorado, NREL uses the vehicle for grid-integration safety or comfort. The fleet serves Electric Range 13 mi studies and demonstrating plug-in vehicle synergies as a technology showcase, helping Seating 5 people with renewable energy. visitors learn about innovative Payload 26.1 ft3 Plug-in electric vehicles—including all-electric vehicles and vehicles that are available today Electric Top Speed 60 mph plug-in hybrid electric vehicles—provide a new opportu- or are in development. Vehicles U.S. Debut 2012 yr nity to reduce oil consumption by drawing on power from in the fleet are representative of Battery Capacity 5.2 kWh the electric grid. To maximize the benefits, the emerging current, advanced, prototype, vehicle-charging infrastructure must provide access to and emerging technologies. Battery Voltage 345.6 V Battery Warranty 8 yr or 100,000 mi clean electricity generated from renewable sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Value Proposition Study
    DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge: Web site: http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone: 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD: 703-487-4639 Fax: 703-605-6900 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordernowabout.htm Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source: Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: 865-576-8401 Fax: 865-576-5728 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Renewables' Challenge
    The ‘Renewables’ Challenge - Biofuels vs. Electric Mobility Hinrich Helms ifeu - Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Udo Lambrecht ifeu - Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg, Germany Nils Rettenmaier ifeu - Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg, Germany Summary Electric vehicles are considered as a key technology for sustainable transport. The use of biofuels in vehicles with con- ventional combustion engines, however, also offers the possibility for a substantial reduction of greenhouse gas emis- sions, without requiring costly batteries and long charging times and without significantly limiting the driving range. A comparison of environmental impacts between both options needs to be based on a life cycle perspective. First screen- ing results presented in this paper show that a diesel car fuelled with RME has considerably lower climate impacts than a comparable battery electric vehicle charged with average German electricity. On the other hand, the use of RME has disadvantages in other impacts categories such as eutrophication. Battery electric vehicles charged with renewable electricity in turn have the best climate impact balance of the considered options and also show among the lowest im- pacts in eutrophication. However, other biofuels such as palm oil and the use of biomass residues offer further reduc- tion potentials, but possibly face limited resources and land use changes. 1. Introduction man Federal Government has therefore set the target of one million electric vehicles in Germany by 2020. Mobility is an important basis for many economic and On the other hand, the use of biofuels in vehicles with private activities and thus a crucial part of our life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supply Chain for Electric Vehicle Batteries
    United States International Trade Commission Journal of International Commerce and Economics December 2018 The Supply Chain for Electric Vehicle Batteries David Coffin and Jeff Horowitz Abstract Electric vehicles (EVs) are a growing part of the passenger vehicle industry due to improved technology, customer interest in reducing carbon footprints, and policy incentives. EV batteries are the key determinant of both the range and cost of the vehicle. This paper explains the importance of EV batteries, describes the structure of the EV battery supply chain, examines current limitations in trade data for EV batteries, and estimates the value added to EV batteries for EVs sold in the United States. Keywords: motor vehicles, cars, passenger vehicles, electric vehicles, vehicle batteries, lithium- ion batteries, supply chain, value chain. Suggested citation: Coffin, David, and Jeff Horowitz. “The Supply Chain for Electric Vehicle Batteries.” Journal of International Commerce and Economics, December 2018. https://www.usitc.gov/journals. This article is the result of the ongoing professional research of USITC staff and is solely meant to represent the opinions and professional research of the authors. It is not meant to represent in any way the views of the U.S. International Trade Commission, any of its individual Commissioners, or the United States Government. Please direct all correspondence to David Coffin and Jeff Horowitz, Office of Industries, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, or by email to [email protected] and [email protected]. The Supply Chain for Electric Vehicle Batteries Introduction Supply chains spreading across countries have added complexity to tracking international trade flows and calculating the value each country receives from a particular good.
    [Show full text]
  • A U.S. Consumer's Guide to Electric Vehicle Charging
    CONSUMER GUIDE TO ELECTRIC VEHICLES JUNE 2021 11570437 WHY BUY AN ELECTRIC CAR? Electric vehicles (EVs) are fun to drive, safe, comfortable, and convenient to refuel. They also cost less to operate per mile and produce no tailpipe emissions. Today’s electric cars do everything a gas car can do—and more. Most are high-performing vehicles with silent, instant torque, superb handling, and the latest technology and safety features. Most can travel 200–250 miles on a charge; many can go farther. Most EV drivers prefer to charge at home for its convenience and savings. A growing national network of public charging sites enables more consumers—even those who can’t plug in at home—to consider purchasing an EV. Because EVs are powered by electricity instead of gasoline, they shift our energy reliance to domestic sources while also reducing emissions. Cutting vehicle emissions is especially critical in communities adjacent to heavily trafficked roadways. As local power generation grows cleaner, every electric car charged on that grid gets cleaner too—and the broader public health and climate benefits increase. Electrifying light-duty transport would reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions by 17% relative to 2018 levels. EV 101 This guide highlights the two types of electric vehicles that plug into the grid to recharge their batteries. They are battery-electric (or all-electric) vehicles and plug-in hybrids. All-electric vehicles are powered solely Plug-in hybrids pair an electric motor by an electric motor and battery. They and battery with an internal-combustion burn no gasoline or diesel fuel, so they engine.
    [Show full text]