Vernal Pools on California's Annual Grasslands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vernal Pools on California's Annual Grasslands Vernal Pools on California's Annual Grasslands Item Type text; Article Authors Barry, Sheila Citation Barry, S. (1995). Vernal pools on California's annual grasslands. Rangelands, 17(5), 173-175. Publisher Society for Range Management Journal Rangelands Rights Copyright © Society for Range Management. Download date 26/09/2021 20:28:15 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/639063 RANGELANDS 17(5), October 1995 173 Vernal Pools on California's Annual Grasslands Sheila Barry The rangelands of the Northern Society estimated that 90% of one of the most significant impacts to Sacramento Valley are comprised of a California's Central Valley vernal pool the vernal pool annual grass popula- great variety of exotic annual plant environments had been eliminated tions. They found that Cocklebur species. These plant species were first (Holland, 1978). Currently, three ver- (Xanthium strumarium), Bindweed introduced in 1769 with the arrival of nal pool plants and four vernal pool (Convolvulus arvensis), etc. in large the Spanish Missions and continued invertebrate species occurring in the vernal pools threatened the habitat of from Gold Rush days to today. By their Sacramento Valley are listed as two endangered vernal pool plant very nature, exotic annual species are threatened or endangered under the species, Hairy Orcutt Grass (Orcuttia aggressive and highly competitive. Federal Endangered Species Act. pilosa) and Hoover's Spurge Because they evolved during thou- Vernal pools and their associated flora (Chamaesyce hooveri). In smaller, sands of years of heavy grazing and and fauna are threatened by a variety swalelike pools they found the intro- periodic drought in their native habitat, of human-caused activities that duced perennial grass, Italian exotic annuals are capable of produc- change the pool's hydrology including Ryegrass (Lolium multiforum), to be a ing some seed under the most adverse grazing disturbances and weather regimes. Consequently, they present a formidable obstacle to re- establishment of native plants (Menke 1992). Exotic annuals now comprise the stable communities of most of California's grasslands (Heady 1977). Despite the invasion of exotic annu- als, native plants have thrived on California's grasslands in vernal pools. In fact, Holland and Jam (1984) found that vernal pools are typically dominat- ed by native plants. Vernal pools are seasonally dry depressions which catch and hold water from winter pre- cipitation until it evaporates into the air and/or percolates into the soil in the spring or summer. They are a type of wetland unique to California and a few other places in the world. Vernal pools provide habitat for an unusual diversity of native crustaceans,grasses and Ungrazed Vernal Pool (excluded from livestock grazing for the past 10 years) Vina wildflowers. These islands of native Plains, TehamaCo. April 1993. flora and fauna should continue to exist and thrive among the exotic annuals as they have for the past 100 urban development,water supply/flood problem for the endangered vernal years if they are protected and proper- control activities and conversion of pool plant, Greene's Tuctoria (Tuctoria ly managed. land to agricultural use (Federal greenei). Register 1992). These habitats are The invasion of weedy exotic Threatsto Vernal Pools in the also indirectly affected by modifica- species into vernal pool habitat can Sacramento tions of surrounding uplands that alter actually be interrelated with changes Valley in In 1978 the California Native Plant a vernal pool's watershed. hydrology.The frequency and abun- Beyond changes in vernal pool dance of weedy upland species in ver- nal tends to increase Universityof california CooperativeExtension, hydrology, the introduction of exotic pools during Farm Advisor, Tehama, Glenn, and Colusa is the threat to vernal drought years (Holland and Jam, species major Native vernal are Counties, P.O. Box 370, Red Bluff Calif. pool habitats. Stone et al. (1987) 1984). pool species 96080,(916) 527-3101 to the seasonal of noted that competition from weeds is adapted pattern 174 RANGELANDS 17(5), October 1995 result of surface runoff. In fact, surface runoff seems to be essential for main- taining an adequate inundation period. Many studies conducted on grass- lands in temperate areas of the United States have shown that the amount of runoff is significantly influenced by the amount of vegetation. Runoff decreas- es in proportion to an increase in the amount of vegetation (Blackburn 1975). Vegetation cover retards runoff and generally allows for greater oppor- tunity for water infiltration. Standing dry or dead vegetation may also increase net rain loss due to direct evaporation. Grazing animals may help to maintain the hydrology of the uplands surrounding vernal pools by preventing the excessive accumulation of plant material. Mechanical impact by grazing ani- mals may also be important for main- Grazed VernalPool Vina Tehama Calif. Plains, County, April 1993. taining the vernal pool hydrology by sustaining the soil conditions that cre- ate vernal pool habitat. Gifford and drought and standing water in the perpetuate vernal pool plants. When Hawkins (1978) reviewed literature on pools. If the period of standing water is horses were removed from a heavily the hydrologic impacts of grazing reduced, the invasion of exotic species grazed horse pasture on the University intensities. They concluded that is promoted. As exotic herbs and of California Santa Barbara campus ungrazed rates of infiltration were sta- grasses invade, the period of inunda- the abundance of vernal pool different from rates at tion species tistically grazed may be further reduced. Bauder seemed to decline in proportionto the any intensity. They found no signifi- (1987) demonstrated that the percent- increase in nonpool species. cant difference between light and age of vegetation in a vernal pool The effects of on moderate but a distinct differ- which grazing rangeland grazing, is exotic is closely tied to length resources are most certainly as com- ence between heavy grazing and of inundation. When were light the pools plex as the various ecosystems in or moderate grazing. only inundated for four weeks or less which livestock grazing occurs. It is Liacos (1962) studied the influence during a year, one-third of the species to out of of livestock on water around the usually easy point examples grazing yields pools' margin were exotic. resource degradation caused by over- and bulk density on California's annual With over two months of inundation instances where He found less than 10 grazing; however, grasslands. that sites heavily percent of species around properly managed maintains for more than 35 had the were exotic. grazing grazed years pool ecological balances and/or promotes more dense and more shallow soil biological diversity are probably than ungrazed sites. Water yield was Grazing-A Tool to Preserve Vernal numerous, especially on California's many times greater under heavy graz- Pool Habitats annual grassland. Properly managed ing. Liacos concluded that when heavy Grazing may be used as a tool to grazing in vernal pool habitats on grazing occurred year after year the maintain vernal pool hydrology and California's annual rangeland may be soil forming process was slowed prevent the invasion of exotic weeds. one such instance where ecological down. It would appear that vernal pool Livestock have grazed in and among balances and biological diversity are habitats on annual grasslands can be most vernal pools in the Sacramento enhanced. maintained if current grazing intensi- Valley for at least a century. Although, ties continue. there are no published data on the to Maintain Vernal Pool In addition to maintaining the hydro- effects of on Grazing grazing vernal pools, Hydrology logic aspects of a vernal pool, the some biologist have made mention of Based on limited monitoring and per- trampling of a grazing animal may also grazing impacts on vernal pools. sonal observations of vernal in influencethe of Zedler pools diversity microecosys- (1987) stated that moderate the Sacramento Hanes et al. tems within a vernal When the cattle or horse region pool. grazing does not seem (1990) reported that direct vernal are wet, animal distur- to pose much of a threat to the precipita- pools persis- tion appears to be a dominant input bances can cause tence of vernal pool plants despite the microdepressions. initially filling pools during the winter. These microdepressions may enable "disruptive" effect of trampling. He also Later in the noted season, flucuations in a shallower pools to provide habitat for that grazing may even help to water level be a pool's may largely vernal pool plants and animals gener- RANGELANDS 17(5), October1995 175 ally found in deeper vernal pools. For ubiquitous vernal pool (perennials) coyote arid rangelands in Nevada. Water bella covers the thistle and the Resources Research 11:929-937. example, Downingia (E,yngium vaseyi) sedge, Beecher. 1959. The bottom of Eleochans restricts the of Crampton, grass genera deeper pools, but is also palustns, density Orcuttia and Neostapfia: a study in habitat found in shallower pools when deeper Orcuttiaand Neostapfia." Observations and morphological specialization. Madrono microdepressionsheld water for a pro- across a fenceline that straddles the main 15:97-110. Evans, R.A. and J.A. Young. 1970. Plant lit- longed time. portion of a vernal pool at Rancho Seco in ter and establishment of alien annual weed Sacramentosuggest that a managed graz- species in rangelandcommunities. Weed Grazing to Prevent Invasion of ing regime may help to control Eleochans. Sci. 18:697-703. The of Eleocharison the side ofthe Federal Register. 1992. Endangered and Weedy Species density threatenedwildlife and to which is plants; proposal Four factors (precipitation, tempera- pool heavily grazed is significantly determine endangered status for four fairy ture, soil characteristics, and plant reduced (Stone et all987). shrimp and the vernal pool tadpole shrimp residue or control in California.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Viruses Virus Diseases Poaceae(Gramineae)
    Viruses and virus diseases of Poaceae (Gramineae) Viruses The Poaceae are one of the most important plant families in terms of the number of species, worldwide distribution, ecosystems and as ingredients of human and animal food. It is not surprising that they support many parasites including and more than 100 severely pathogenic virus species, of which new ones are being virus diseases regularly described. This book results from the contributions of 150 well-known specialists and presents of for the first time an in-depth look at all the viruses (including the retrotransposons) Poaceae(Gramineae) infesting one plant family. Ta xonomic and agronomic descriptions of the Poaceae are presented, followed by data on molecular and biological characteristics of the viruses and descriptions up to species level. Virus diseases of field grasses (barley, maize, rice, rye, sorghum, sugarcane, triticale and wheats), forage, ornamental, aromatic, wild and lawn Gramineae are largely described and illustrated (32 colour plates). A detailed index Sciences de la vie e) of viruses and taxonomic lists will help readers in their search for information. Foreworded by Marc Van Regenmortel, this book is essential for anyone with an interest in plant pathology especially plant virology, entomology, breeding minea and forecasting. Agronomists will also find this book invaluable. ra The book was coordinated by Hervé Lapierre, previously a researcher at the Institut H. Lapierre, P.-A. Signoret, editors National de la Recherche Agronomique (Versailles-France) and Pierre A. Signoret emeritus eae (G professor and formerly head of the plant pathology department at Ecole Nationale Supérieure ac Agronomique (Montpellier-France). Both have worked from the late 1960’s on virus diseases Po of Poaceae .
    [Show full text]
  • Cramvernal Pool Endemics-Final.Pdf
    Vernal Pool Systems and Individual Vernal Pools Version 6.1 APPENDIX 1 Vernal Pool Endemic Plant List Use this list to determine if a species is a vernal pool endemic Bsed on Appendix C from: T. Keeler-Wolf, D.R. Elam, K. Lewis, S.A. Flint. 1998. California Vernal Pool Assessment Preliminary Report. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game. 161 pp. www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/wetlands/pdfs/VernalPoolAssessmentPreliminaryReport.pdf May 2013 ! CRAM%Vernal%Pool%Endemic%Plants%List May%2013 Scientific%Name Family Genus Species infraspecific_rank %infraspecific_epithet Agrostis(elliottiana POACEAE Agrostis elliottiana Agrostis(hendersonii POACEAE Agrostis hendersonii Agrostis(microphylla POACEAE Agrostis microphylla Alopecurus(carolinianus POACEAE Alopecurus carolinianus Alopecurus(saccatus POACEAE Alopecurus saccatus Anagallis(minima MYRSINACEAE Anagallis minima Astragalus(tener(var.(ferrisiae FABACEAE Astragalus tener var. ferrisiae Astragalus(tener(var.(tener FABACEAE Astragalus tener var. tener Atriplex(cordulata CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata Atriplex(cordulata(var.(cordulata CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata var. cordulata Atriplex(cordulata(var.(erecticaulis CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex cordulata var. erecticaulis Atriplex(depressa CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex depressa Atriplex(minuscula CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex minuscula Atriplex(parishii CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex parishii Atriplex(persistens CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex persistens Atriplex(subtilis CHENOPODIACEAE Atriplex subtilis Blennosperma(bakeri ASTERACEAE Blennosperma
    [Show full text]
  • California Wetlands
    VOL. 46, NO.2 FREMONTIA JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY California Wetlands 1 California Native Plant Society CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 Phone: (916) 447-2677 • Fax: (916) 447-2727 FREMONTIA www.cnps.org • [email protected] VOL. 46, NO. 2, November 2018 Memberships Copyright © 2018 Members receive many benefits, including a subscription toFremontia California Native Plant Society and the CNPS Bulletin. Look for more on inside back cover. ISSN 0092-1793 (print) Mariposa Lily.............................$1,500 Family..............................................$75 ISSN 2572-6870 (online) Benefactor....................................$600 International or library...................$75 Patron............................................$300 Individual................................$45 Gordon Leppig, Editor Plant lover.....................................$100 Student/retired..........................$25 Michael Kauffmann, Editor & Designer Corporate/Organizational 10+ Employees.........................$2,500 4-6 Employees..............................$500 7-10 Employees.........................$1,000 1-3 Employees............................$150 Staff & Contractors Dan Gluesenkamp: Executive Director Elizabeth Kubey: Outreach Coordinator Our mission is to conserve California’s Alfredo Arredondo: Legislative Analyst Sydney Magner: Asst. Vegetation Ecologist native plants and their natural habitats, Christopher Brown: Membership & Sales David Magney: Rare Plant Program Manager and increase understanding,
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605 Sacramento, California 95825 March 5, 2015 Document Number: 150305102524 Carlos Alvarado Ascent Environmental 455 Capitol Mall Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Subject: Species List for Nishi Gateway Project Dear: Mr. Alvarado We are sending this official species list in response to your March 5, 2015 request for information about endangered and threatened species. The list covers the California counties and/or U.S. Geological Survey 7½ minute quad or quads you requested. Our database was developed primarily to assist Federal agencies that are consulting with us. Therefore, our lists include all of the sensitive species that have been found in a certain area and also ones that may be affected by projects in the area. For example, a fish may be on the list for a quad if it lives somewhere downstream from that quad. Birds are included even if they only migrate through an area. In other words, we include all of the species we want people to consider when they do something that affects the environment. Please read Important Information About Your Species List (below). It explains how we made the list and describes your responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act. Our database is constantly updated as species are proposed, listed and delisted. If you address proposed and candidate species in your planning, this should not be a problem. However, we recommend that you get an updated list every 90 days. That would be June 03, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Glume Absence in the Orcuttieae (Gramineae: Chloridoideae) and a Hypothisis of Intratribal Relationships Eric H
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 18 | Issue 1 Article 17 1999 Glume absence in the Orcuttieae (Gramineae: Chloridoideae) and a hypothisis of intratribal relationships Eric H. Roalson Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Roalson, Eric H. (1999) "Glume absence in the Orcuttieae (Gramineae: Chloridoideae) and a hypothisis of intratribal relationships," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 18: Iss. 1, Article 17. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol18/iss1/17 Aliso, 18(1), pp. 67-70 © 1999, by The Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA 91711-3157 GLUME ABSENCE IN THE ORCUTTIEAE (GRAMINEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE) AND A HYPOTHESIS OF INTRATRIBAL RELATIONSHIPS ERIC H. ROALSON AND J. TRAVIS COLUMBUS Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden 1500 North College Avenue Claremont, California 91711-3157 ABSTRACT This study addresses glume absence in tribe Orcuttieae. In Orcuttia califomica, 0. inaequalis, and 0. viscida, all spikelets possess two glumes except for the terminal spikelet of the inflorescence, which lacks both glumes. In 0. pilosa and Tuctoria greenei the terminal spikelet lacks only the first (prox­ imal) glume, whereas in 0. tenuis, T. fragilis, and T. mucronata both glumes are developed on all spikelets. This is the first report of glume absence in species of Orcuttieae other than Neostapfia colusana, which has been long reported to lack both glumes on all spikelets. A hypothesis of phylo­ genetic relationships in the tribe is presented and characters involved are discussed. We hypothesize Neostapfia to be sister to a Tuctoria/Orcuttia clade, and Tuctoria to be a grade leading to a mono­ phyletic Orcuttia.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetic Diversity and Structure of Two Rare Vernal Pool Grasses in Central California
    Conserv Genet (2012) 13:117–130 DOI 10.1007/s10592-011-0269-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Population genetic diversity and structure of two rare vernal pool grasses in central California Sarah P. Gordon • Christina M. Sloop • Heather G. Davis • J. Hall Cushman Received: 14 March 2011 / Accepted: 1 September 2011 / Published online: 5 October 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract Vernal pool ecosystems are declining (Fst = 0.11, P \ 0.0001). We found very slight temporal throughout California, with only 10% of historic habitat genetic structure at one N. colusana (Fst = 0.013, remaining. This has endangered many specialist endemic P \ 0.05) and two T. greenei (Fst = 0.015, Fst = 0.018, plant species, leaving extant populations fragmented, iso- P \ 0.05) pools. These estimates of population genetic lated, and threatened or endangered. Recovery plans for the diversity and structure are critical measures for both spe- increasing number of endangered vernal pool species cies that will help inform recovery management actions. require information on their genetic and ecological status to guide conservation and restoration efforts. Federally Keywords Genetic structure Á Genetic diversity Á threatened Neostapfia colusana (Colusa grass) and feder- Endangered species Á Vernal pool grasses Á Habitat ally endangered Tuctoria greenei (Greene’s tuctoria) are fragmentation Á Microsatellite Á Tuctoria sp. Á two endemic vernal pool grasses of high conservation Neostapfia colusana concern in central California. Remaining populations are highly fragmented due to range-wide habitat destruction. Using five polymorphic microsatellite markers for each Introduction species, we performed genetic surveys of 240 individuals from eight vernal pools for N.
    [Show full text]
  • California Grasslands and Range Forage Grasses
    CALIFORNIA GRASSLANDS AND RANGE FORAGE GRASSES ARTHUR W. SAMPSON AGNES CHASE DONALD W. HEDRICK BULLETIN 724 MAY, 1951 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION i THE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA . CALIFORNIA GRASSLANDS AND RANGE FORAGE GRASSES provides useful and technical information on the uncultivated or wild grass- lands, and the native and naturalized range forage grasses of California. This bulletin will be helpful to you if you are among these readers: 1 Stockmen who have had some botanical training and who will want to use the illustrated keys and descriptions to determine the identity and the relative usefulness of the grasses growing on their range; 2. Range technicians and range appraisers who are chiefly concerned with management, evaluations, and economic considerations of the state's range lands; and 3. Students of range management and related fields whose knowl- edge of ecology, forage value, and taxonomy of the range grasses is an essential part of their training or official work. THE AUTHORS: Arthur W. Sampson is Professor of Forestry and Plant Ecologist in the Experiment Station, Berkeley. Agnes Chase is Research Associate, U. S. National Herbarium, Smithsonian Institu- tion; formerly Senior Agrostologist, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Donald W. Hedrick is Research Assistant in the Department of Forestry; on leave from the Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Manuscript submitted for publication August 22, 1949. CONTENTS PAGE Introduction . 5 Where Grasses Grow 7 Topography, climate, grassland soils, life zones, grasslands in relation to other plant associations Plant Succession and the Climax Cover 17 The Nutrition of Range Grasses 18 Annual vs.
    [Show full text]
  • JEPSON PRAIRIE—WILL IT BE PRESERVED? by W
    FREMONTIA A Journal of the California Native Plant Society, 1981, Vol. 9(1):7-11 ______________________________________________________________________________ JEPSON PRAIRIE—WILL IT BE PRESERVED? by W. James Barry ______________________________________________________________________________ The largest and best preserved example of California grasslands is found in southern Solano County, where there still exists an area of more than 13,000 acres which has never been plowed. This area, known as Jepson Prairie, also includes the best remaining examples of vernal pool communities in California and four rare and endangered species of plants. Jepson Prairie is located approximately fifteen miles south of Dixon, in the vicinity of Dozier, Denverton, and Travis Air Force Base. It is approximately eighty miles from the San Francisco and Sacramento metropolitan areas via State Highways 12 and 113. There are few access roads within the area. This Central Valley “island in time” is named for the remarkable botanist, Willis Linn Jepson, who was born in 1867 near Vacaville, a few miles away. Dr. Jepson early became familiar with the flora of Solano County. In 1892 he described a new species from the “alkali spots,” which he termed “vernal pools” and “hogwallows” in later works. His most famous work is his 1,238 page A Manual of the flowering Plants of California, published in 1925. He and his students are largely responsible for the botanical knowledge we have on the unique vernal communities. Long the object of preservation attempts by a wide number of conservation organizations, including the California Native Plant Society, these vernal pools and areas of nearly pristine grasslands may be on the verge of being saved.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.12 Population Genetics of Vernal Pool Plants: Theory, Data And
    Population Genetics of Vernal Pool Plants: Theory, Data and Conservation Implications DIANE R. ELAM Natural Heritage Division, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA 95814 CURRENT ADDRESS. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 3310 El Camino Ave., Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95821 ([email protected]) ABSTRACT. One goal of population genetics is to quantify and explain genetic structure within and among populations. Factors such as genetic drift, inbreeding, gene flow and selection are expected to influence levels and distribution of genetic variation. I review available data on genetic structure of vernal pool plant species with respect to these factors. Where relevant data are lacking, as is often the case for vernal pool plants, I examine how these factors are expected to influence vernal pool population genetic structure. I also consider whether the available population genetic data and theory can help provide approximate predictions of the genetic structure of unstudied vernal pool plant species and suggest reasonable approaches to conservation and management. CITATION. Pages 180-189 in: C.W. Witham, E.T. Bauder, D. Belk, W.R. Ferren Jr., and R. Ornduff (Editors). Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems – Proceedings from a 1996 Conference. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. 1998. INTRODUCTION 1989), I examine the expectations of theory and available data for vernal pool plant taxa for each of these factors. In the early 1980’s, genetic approaches were identified as po- tentially useful tools in conservation biology for answering FACTORS AFFECTING POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE questions about population viability, long-term persistence of populations and species, and maintenance of evolutionary po- Genetic Drift tential (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN (SJMSCP) November 14, 2000
    SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN (SJMSCP) November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000 THIS PAGE BLANK November 14, 2000 Funding for this document was provided by a grant from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation with assistance from the San Joaquin County Transportation Authority, the City of Tracy, and the City of Lathrop November 14, 2000 THIS PAGE BLANK November 14, 2000 SJMSCP STEERING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT HABITAT POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Phillip Pennino, Chair City of Lodi Robert Cabral, Vice Chair San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors Ron Addington Business Dan Gifford/Robert Mapes/Dave Zezulak/Terry Roscoe California Department of Fish and Game Mitch Hayden U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waldo Holt Conservation William Lehman/Sheila Larsen/Peter Cross/Robert Pine/Ken Fuller/Mike Horton Cay Goude/Jan Knight/Ann Chrisney/Vicki Campbell/Jim Browning U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Brad Lange Agriculture Bruce Mettler Agriculture Tonie Marie Raymus Business Martha Shaver Land Trusts Steve Stocking Conservation Doug Unruh Business HABITAT STAFF WORKING GROUP Margit Aramburu Delta Protection Commission Luis Arismendi/Don Cose Business Mike Brown Aggregate Mining Ben Cantu Manteca Pam Carder Lathrop John Carlson/Mike Niblock Stockton Dan Gifford/Robert Mapes/Dave Zezulak/ Terry Roscoe California Department of Fish and Game Brian Millar/Barry Hand Tracy Mitch Hayden U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waldo Holt Conservation William Lehman/Sheila Larsen/Peter Cross/Robert Pine/Ken Fuller/Mike Horton/ Cay Goude/Jan Knight/Ann Chrisney/Vicki Campbell/Jim Browning U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Peggy Keranen/Kitty Walker San Joaquin County Rad Bartlam/David Morimoto Lodi Dale Steele, Gina Moran Caltrans Ernest Tyhurst Ripon Julia E.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY ORCUTT GRASS Orcuttia Inaequalis USFWS: Threatened CDFG: Endangered CNPS: List 1B
    LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. PUBLIC DRAFT SOLANO HCP JULY 2012 SOLANO COUNTY WATER AGENCY NATURAL COMMUNITY AND SPECIES ACCOUNTS SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY ORCUTT GRASS Orcuttia inaequalis USFWS: Threatened CDFG: Endangered CNPS: List 1B Species Account Status and Description. San Joaquin Valley orcutt grass was federally-listed as threatened on March 26, 1997 (USFWS 1997) and state-listed in September 1979. It is on CNPS’ List 1B. Critical habitat was designated on August 6, 2003 (USFWS 2003a) and did not include Solano County. San Joaquin Valley orcutt grass is a small, tufted annual grass in the Orcutt tribe (Orcuttieae) of the grass family (Poaceae). The 5 to 15 cm tall stems are erect to spreading, sometimes forming mats, with grayish foliage with soft, straight hairs. The five lemma teeth are unequal, the central tooth being the longest. At maturity, the spikelets are aggregated into capitate clusters (Baldwin 2012). Greg Gallaugher The foliage is somewhat sticky from glandular secretions and fragrant (USFWS 2003b). Range and Distribution. San Joaquin Valley orcutt grass is the only orcutt grass considered restricted to San Joaquin Valley. Historically, its range included the eastern margin of the valley, from Stanislaus County to Tulare County. Most of the populations have been extirpated, including all of those in Stanislaus County (CNPS 2011). Of the 52 known occurrences of San Joaquin Valley orcutt grass, 31 are presumed to be extant; although only three of these occurrences have been revisited in the past decade ( CNDDB 2011, USFWS 2005). Twenty-three (23) populations are presently known in a 36-mile long strip in Fresno, Merced, and Madera counties, on the east side of the Valley (USFWS 2003b), and the remaining occurrences are in Solano and Tulare counties (CNDDB 2011).
    [Show full text]