DOCSLIB.ORG

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN (SJMSCP) November 14, 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN (SJMSCP) November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000 THIS PAGE BLANK November 14, 2000 Funding for this document was provided by a grant from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation with assistance from the San Joaquin County Transportation Authority, the City of Tracy, and the City of Lathrop November 14, 2000 THIS PAGE BLANK November 14, 2000 SJMSCP STEERING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT HABITAT POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Phillip Pennino, Chair City of Lodi Robert Cabral, Vice Chair San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors Ron Addington Business Dan Gifford/Robert Mapes/Dave Zezulak/Terry Roscoe California Department of Fish and Game Mitch Hayden U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waldo Holt Conservation William Lehman/Sheila Larsen/Peter Cross/Robert Pine/Ken Fuller/Mike Horton Cay Goude/Jan Knight/Ann Chrisney/Vicki Campbell/Jim Browning U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Brad Lange Agriculture Bruce Mettler Agriculture Tonie Marie Raymus Business Martha Shaver Land Trusts Steve Stocking Conservation Doug Unruh Business HABITAT STAFF WORKING GROUP Margit Aramburu Delta Protection Commission Luis Arismendi/Don Cose Business Mike Brown Aggregate Mining Ben Cantu Manteca Pam Carder Lathrop John Carlson/Mike Niblock Stockton Dan Gifford/Robert Mapes/Dave Zezulak/ Terry Roscoe California Department of Fish and Game Brian Millar/Barry Hand Tracy Mitch Hayden U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waldo Holt Conservation William Lehman/Sheila Larsen/Peter Cross/Robert Pine/Ken Fuller/Mike Horton/ Cay Goude/Jan Knight/Ann Chrisney/Vicki Campbell/Jim Browning U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Peggy Keranen/Kitty Walker San Joaquin County Rad Bartlam/David Morimoto Lodi Dale Steele, Gina Moran Caltrans Ernest Tyhurst Ripon Julia E. Greene, Andrew Chesley, Susan Nejedly, Bart Meays/ Jerry Park San Joaquin Council of Governments STAFF Julia E. Greene, Executive Director San Joaquin Council of Governments Barton R. Meays, Executive Director - Retired San Joaquin Council of Governments Andrew T. Chesley, Deputy Executive Director San Joaquin Council of Governments Susan Nejedly, Senior Regional Planner San Joaquin Council of Governments Jerry Park, Regional Planner San Joaquin Council of Governments LEGAL REVIEW Dana Jacobsen/ Jim Monroe - Assistant Regional Solicitors U.S. Department of the Interior Adam Relin Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliot, LLP TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Amy Augustine Augustine Land Use Planning, Sonora (Coordination, Prepare Plan,EIR/EIS) Sally Nielsen Hausrath Economics Group, Oakland (Economics, Nexus Review) Sandra Guldman Toyon Environmental Consultants, Inc. (Biological/Land Use) - Kentfield November 14, 2000 THIS PAGE BLANK November 14, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, PLANNING PROCESS AND OBJECTIVES 1.1 Executive Summary . 1-1 1.1.1 Purpose . 1-1 1.1.2 Plan Term and Setting . 1-1 1.1.3 SJMSCP Permitted Activities/Species . 1-1 1.1.4 Effects of Open Space Conversions Addressed in SJMSCP . 1-2 1.1.4.1 Incidental Take/Habitat Loss . 1-2 1.1.4.2 Multi-Purpose Open Space . 1-3 1.1.5 Compensation and Land Acquisition/Management . 1-5 1.1.6 Implementing Strategy . 1-7 1.1.6.1 Pay-As-You-Go . 1-7 1.1.6.2 Jump-Start . 1-7 1.1.6.3 Timing of Fee Collections/In-Lieu Land Dedications/Mitigation Bank Purchases 1-8 1.1.6.4 Voluntary Plan . 1-9 1.1.7 Applicable Regulations . 1-12 1.1.8 Permits, Authorizations, Opinions, Consultations . 1-13 1.1.9 Permitting Agencies . 1-16 1.1.10 Permittee/Plan Participants . 1-16 1.1.11 Implementing Entity--SJMSCP Joint Powers Authority (JPA) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) . 1-16 1.1.12 Monitoring and Enforcement . 1-17 1.1.13 Implementation Agreement . 1-17 1.1.14 Environmental Effects . 1-18 1.1.15 Plan Costs, Funding, Cost/Benefit Analysis . 1-18 1.1.15.1 Plan Costs . 1-18 1.1.15.2 Fair Share Allocation of Costs. 1-19 1.1.15.3 Plan Fees . 1-21 1.1.15.4 Proposed Funding Strategy . 1-22 1.1.15.5 Funding Assurances . 1-25 1.1.15.6 Cost/Benefit Analysis . 1-25 1.1.16 Consistency with Local General Plans . 1-26 1.2 Background and Planning Process . 1-26 1.3 Objectives . 1-28 1.4 Description of Alternatives Considered . 1-29 1.4.1 No Project/No Action . 1-29 1.4.2 Reduced Land Acquisition with Increased Preserve Enhancements . 1-29 1.4.3 Elimination of Wetlands Coverage . 1-29 1.4.4 Locating Some Preserves Outside of County . 1-30 1.4.5 Alternative Fee Structure . 1-30 1.4.6 Five-Acre Exemption . 1-30 1.4.7 Eliminate Coverage for Non-Listed Special Status Species . .1-30 1.4.8 Reduced Coverage for Swainson's Hawk and Associated Species . 1-30 1.4.9 Increase Coverage for Fisheries . 1-31 1.4.10 Partial Participation . 1-31 1.4.11 No Take . 1-32 2. OPEN SPACE SETTING 2.1 Environmental Setting . 2-1 November 14, 2000 i 2.2 Biological Setting . 2-4 2.2.1 Vegetation Types . 2-4 2.2.1.1 Natural Lands . 2-8 2.2.1.2 Agricultural Habitat Lands . 2-11 2.2.1.3 Multi-Purpose Open Space Lands . 2-11 2.2.1.4 Urban Lands . 2-12 2.2.2 SJMSCP Covered Species . 2-12 2.2.2.1 Species Considered, but Not Included . 2-19 2.2.2.2 Summary of Data Collected and Analyzed for Covered Species/Species Needs .2-24 A. Plants . 2-24 B. Invertebrates . 2-30 C. Fish . 2-35 D. Amphibians . 2-40 E. Reptiles . 2-43 F. Birds . 2-44 G. Mammals . 2-53 2.3 Agricultural Setting . 2-61 2.4 Recreational Setting . 2-63 2.5 Scenic Setting . 2-63 2.6 Multi-Purpose Open Space Setting . 2-64 3. LAND USE 3.1 SJMSCP Planned Land Use Map . 3-1 3.2 Sources . 3-1 3.3 Mapped Land Use Designations . 3-3 3.3.1 Agriculture . 3-3 3.3.2 Urban . 3-4 3.3.3 Parks . 3-5 3.3.4 Open Space/Conservation . 3-5 3.3.5 Mineral Resources . .3-5 3.3.6 Site 300 . 3-6 3.3.7 Undeveloped Public Lands . 3-6 3.3.8 Land Uses Mapped on the SJMSCP Vegetation Maps . 3-6 3.4 Unmapped Land Uses . 3-7 3.5 Future Land Use . 3-8 3.6 Consistency with Local General Plans . 3-9 4. ESTIMATED OPEN SPACE CONVERSIONS 4.1 Methodology for Determining When Open Space Conversions Results in Incidental Take Versus When Open Space Conversions Do Not Result in Incidental Take . 4-1 4.1.1 Comprehensive Compensation Pursuant to Local State and Federal Plant, Fish and Wildlife Regulations . 4-1 4.1.2 Determining When Open Space Conversion Results in Incidental Take and Requires Compensation . 4-4 4.2 Estimated Acres of Open Space Conversions . 4-8 4.3 Estimated Incidental Take by Species . 4-11 5. CONSERVATION STRATEGY 5.1 Overview of Conservation Strategy . 5-1 November 14, 2000 ii 5.1.1 Summary . 5-1 5.1.2 SJMSCP Index Zones as a Basis for Implementing the Conservation Strategy . 5-2 5.1.2.1 Southwest Zone . 5-2 5.1.2.2 Central Zone . 5-3 5.1.2.3 Primary Zone of the Delta . 5-4 5.1.2.4 Vernal Pool Zone . 5-5 5.1.2.5 Central/Southwest Transition Zone . 5-5 5.1.2.6 The Influence of Index Zones on the Compensation Requirements of the SJMSCP 5-6 5.2 Measures to Minimize Impacts - Incidental Take Minimization Measures. 5-16 5.2.1 Establishing Conditions of Project Approval Related to Incidental Take Minimization Measures 5-16 5.2.1.1 Review Process and Condition Format . .5-16 5.2.1.2 Time Limits for JPA Review of Discretionary Projects . 5-17 5.2.1.3 Completion of Incidental Take Minimization Measures - Responsibilities of Project Proponent . 5-17 5.2.2 Preconstruction Surveys . 5-18 5.2.2.1 Overview . 5-18 5.2.2.2 Time Limits for Conducting JPA Preconstruction Surveys . .5-19 5.2.2.3 Determining the Necessity for Site Visits as Part of Preconstruction Surveys . 5-19 5.2.2.4 Special Provisions for Conducting Preconstruction Surveys for Plants . 5-19 5.2.2.5 Preconstruction Survey Methodologies . 5-26 5.2.3 Incidental Take Minimization - Overview of Process . 5-28 5.2.3.1 Incidental Take Minimization Strategy and Expectations for All SJMSCP Covered Species . 5-29 5.2.3.2 Exceptions to 5.2.3.1 . 5-30 5.2.4 Incidental Take Minimization Measures for SJMSCP Covered Species . 5-31 5.2.4.1 Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle . 5-31 5.2.4.2 Moestan and Molestan Blister Beetle . 5-32 5.2.4.3 Ciervo Aegialian Scarab Beetle . 5-32 5.2.4.4 Vernal Pool Plants and Vernal Pool Invertebrates . 5-33 5.2.4.5 California Tiger Salamander, Western Spadefoot Toad with 404 Permit. 5-33 5.2.4.6 California Tiger Salamander, Western Spadefoot Toad w/o 404 Permit . 5-33 5.2.4.7 Red-Legged Frogs and Yellow-Legged Frogs . 5-34 5.2.4.8 Giant Garter Snake . 5-36 5.2.4.9 San Joaquin Whipsnake, California Horned Lizard . 5-37 5.2.4.10 Pond Turtles . 5-37 5.2.4.11 Swainson's Hawk . 5-37 5.2.4.12 California Black Rail . 5-38 5.2.4.13 Bank Swallow and Yellow-Billed Cuckoo . 5-38 5.2.4.14 Aleutian Canada Goose and Greater Sandhill Crane .
Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office

    0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office

    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • Hudson River Estuary Wildlife and Habitat Conservation Framework

    Hudson River Estuary Wildlife and Habitat Conservation Framework

    PART I: An Approach to Biodiversity Conservation Introduction The Hudson River Valley is one of New York State’s most impressive regions, rich in history, and cultural, geological, and biological diversity (Figure 1). At the heart of this region is the Hudson River Estuary, which ranges from saline to fresh water, and pulses daily with four-foot ocean tides. The Hudson River Estuary corridor is one of the most densely populated areas of the country and has long been the fastest growing region of the state. Additionally, it is one of the state’s primary industrial centers. As a result, tremendous pressures have been placed on the health and sustainability of the region’s natural resources. Despite these stresses, it remains highly productive with thousands of species of plants and animals. Because of the diversity and complexity of both the biological resources and the threats that face these resources, partnerships involving landowners, municipalities, non-profit organizations, government agencies, and others must be developed to effectively con- serve biodiversity in the Hudson River Valley. Successful implementation of the strate- gies and actions presented in this report will require a commitment to both developing and sustaining these partnerships. The Hudson River Estuary Biodiversity Program The purpose of the Hudson River Estuary Biodiversity Program is to support the conser- vation, recovery, and sustainable use of the biodiversity of the Hudson River Estuary cor- ridor, especially as it relates to terrestrial ecosystems. The project emphasizes voluntary approaches to biodiversity conservation in the context of local home rule. The broad goals of the program are: 1.
  • Reforming Section 10 and the Habitat Conservation Plan Program David A

    Reforming Section 10 and the Habitat Conservation Plan Program David A

    Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Working Papers 2009 Reforming Section 10 and the Habitat Conservation Plan Program David A. Dana Northwestern University School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation Dana, David A., "Reforming Section 10 and the Habitat Conservation Plan Program" (2009). Faculty Working Papers. Paper 193. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/193 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. DRAFT Reforming Section 10 and the Habitat Conservation Program David A. Dana Northwestern University One of the central dilemmas of the Endangered Species Act is how to foster species conservation and recovery on private land. Much of the habitat thought to be occupied by endangered species is on private land. According to some estimates, more than two thirds of listed endangered species can be found on private land.1 And even in areas where there is substantial federal land that contains critical habitat, the federal land often is part of a patchwork of federal, state, local and purely private holdings. (Importantly, the Act treats state and locally-owned land as private land.) In such cases, any comprehensive recovery plan would need to extend to private land. In theory, the Endangered Species Act powerfully addresses the risks posed to endangered species by private development and other economic activity on private land. Section Nine of the Act prohibits the "taking" of endangered species on private land, and broadly defines "take."2 The Fish and Wildlife Service's regulation implementing Section 9 clearly encompass private development activity that kills or prevents the reproduction of protected species members,3 and the United States Supreme Court upheld 4 that regulation in Sweet Home v.
  • Enhancing Environmental Flows of Putah Creek for Chinook Salmon Reproductive Requirements

    Enhancing Environmental Flows of Putah Creek for Chinook Salmon Reproductive Requirements

    Enhancing environmental flows of Putah Creek for Chinook salmon reproductive requirements Written by: Chan, Brian; Jasper, Chris Reynolds; Stott, Haley Kathryn UC Davis, California ESM 122, Water Science and Management, Section: A02 Abstract: Putah creek, like many of California’s rivers and streams, is highly altered by anthropogenic actions and historically supported large populations of resident and anadromous native fish species. Now its ecosystem dynamics have changed drastically with the Monticello dam, the Solano diversion canal and the leveeing of its banks. Over time the creek has found a balance of habitats for native and non-native fish species that is mainly dictated by species-preferred temperature tolerances (Keirman et. al. 2012). Cooler temperatures and faster flows upstream from Davis prove to be ideal habitats for native species, in particular, the federally endangered Chinook salmon, which is the most widely distributed and most numerous run occurring in the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and their tributaries. As water moves downstream, it becomes shallower and warmer, resulting in ideal conditions for non-native species (Winters, 2005). This report analyzes the environmental flows released into putah creek and how much salmon preferred breeding habitat is available from this flow regime based on temperature. Introduction: Figure 1: Teale GIS Solutions Group (1999), US Census Bureau (2002), USGS (1993) [within Winters, 2005] The Putah Creek watershed is an important aspect in the natural, social, and economic livelihoods of the people of Yolo and Solano counties. The Putah Creek watershed begins at the highest point in Lake County, Cobb Mountain, and flows down to the Central Valley where it empties into the Yolo Bypass at near sea level.
  • Programmatic Environmental Impact Report

    Programmatic Environmental Impact Report

    Water Hyacinth Control Program FINAL Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Volume I – Chapters 1 to 7 November 30, 2009 A program for effective control of Water Hyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its tributaries. Copies of this Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report in hard copy form, or on computer compact disc (CD), can be obtained from the California Department of Boating and Waterways. To request a report copy, please contact: Ms. Terri Ely Aquatic Weed Program California Department of Boating and Waterways 2000 Evergreen Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, California 95815 (916) 263-8138 [email protected] Cover photo: March 14, 2008, by NewPoint Group, Inc., of the Wheeler Island Duck Club, at Honker Bay. [PARTIAL] Water Hyacinth Control Program Water Hyacinth Control Program A program for effective control of Water Hyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its tributaries. FINAL Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Volume I – Chapters 1 to 7 November 30, 2009 Prepared by: The California Department of Boating and Waterways With Technical Assistance from: NewPoint Group, Inc. 2555 Third Street, Suite 215 Sacramento, California 95818 (916) 442-0508 www.newpointgroup.com ~----Pei:at f~m.A; _ _,__,..._... AniJru--~- ' --sepat Table of Contents Volume I – Chapters 1 to 7 Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................... AA-1 Executive Summary.......................................................................... ES-1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................
  • Geologic Features and Ground-Water Storage Capacity of the Sacramento Valley California

    Geologic Features and Ground-Water Storage Capacity of the Sacramento Valley California

    Geologic Features and Ground-Water Storage Capacity of the Sacramento Valley California By F. H. OLMSTED and G. H. DAVIS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1497 Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of ff^ater Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director Tlie TT.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 241. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Abstract___________________________________________________ -_ 1 Introduction.-.--- .___-___________-___._--.______-----_ 5 Purpose and scope of the investigation.__________________ ______ 5 Location of area__-__-________-____________-_-___-_-__--____-_- 6 Development of ground water___________________-___-__ ___ __ 7 Acknowledgments....-------- ____________ _________________ 8 Well-numbering system..________________________________ _ 9 Geology--__--_--_--__----_--_-----____----_ --_ ___-__-- 10 Geomorphology_____________________________________________ 10 General features _______________________________________ 10 Mountainous region east of the Sacramento Valley...__________ 11 Sierra Nevada_______________________________________ 11 Cascade Range.._____________________-__--_-__-_---- 13 Plains and foothill region on the east side of the Sacramento Valley..__-_________-_.-____.___________ 14 Dissected alluvial uplands west of the Sierra
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
  • Breeding System Diversification and Evolution in American Poa Supersect. Homalopoa (Poaceae: Poeae: Poinae)

    Breeding System Diversification and Evolution in American Poa Supersect. Homalopoa (Poaceae: Poeae: Poinae)

    Annals of Botany Page 1 of 23 doi:10.1093/aob/mcw108, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Breeding system diversification and evolution in American Poa supersect. Homalopoa (Poaceae: Poeae: Poinae) Liliana M. Giussani1,*, Lynn J. Gillespie2, M. Amalia Scataglini1,Marıa A. Negritto3, Ana M. Anton4 and Robert J. Soreng5 1Instituto de Botanica Darwinion, San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2Research and Collections Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 3Universidad de Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia, 4Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologıa Vegetal (IMBIV), CONICET-UNC, Cordoba, Argentina and 5Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA *For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 11 December 2015 Returned for revision: 18 February 2016 Accepted: 18 March 2016 Downloaded from Background and Aims Poa subgenus Poa supersect. Homalopoa has diversified extensively in the Americas. Over half of the species in the supersection are diclinous; most of these are from the New World, while a few are from South-East Asia. Diclinism in Homalopoa can be divided into three main types: gynomonoecism, gynodioe- cism and dioecism. Here the sampling of species of New World Homalopoa is expanded to date its origin and diver- sification in North and South America and examine the evolution and origin of the breeding system diversity. Methods A total of 124 specimens were included in the matrix, of which 89 are species of Poa supersect. http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/ Homalopoa sections Acutifoliae, Anthochloa, Brizoides, Dasypoa, Dioicopoa, Dissanthelium, Homalopoa sensu lato (s.l.), Madropoa and Tovarochloa, and the informal Punapoa group. Bayesian and parsimony analyses were conducted on the data sets based on four markers: the nuclear ribosomal internal tanscribed spacer (ITS) and exter- nal transcribed spacer (ETS), and plastid trnT-L and trnL-F.
  • Appendix 4.3-1 Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Letter Species List

    Appendix 4.3-1 Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Letter Species List

    APPENDIX 4.3-1 CNDDB RESULTS SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES PLANT AND WILDLIFE DATABASE CNPS INVENTORY Sacramento Fish & Wildlife Office, Customized Species List Letter United States Department of the Interior Departmento Fish & Wildlife Service of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE logo logo Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605 Sacramento, California 95825 September 18, 2007 Document Number: 070918092715 Angela Calderaro PMC 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Subject: Species List for Mitchell Ranch Center Dear: Interested party We are sending this official species list in response to your September 18, 2007 request for information about endangered and threatened species. The list covers the California counties and/or U.S. Geological Survey 7½ minute quad or quads you requested. Our database was developed primarily to assist Federal agencies that are consulting with us. Therefore, our lists include all of the sensitive species that have been found in a certain area and also ones that may be affected by projects in the area. For example, a fish may be on the list for a quad if it lives somewhere downstream from that quad. Birds are included even if they only migrate through an area. In other words, we include all of the species we want people to consider when they do something that affects the environment. Please read Important Information About Your Species List (below). It explains how we made the list and describes your responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act. Our database is constantly updated as species are proposed, listed and delisted. If you address proposed and candidate species in your planning, this should not be a problem.
  • Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project

    Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project

    LLNL-AR-820616 L L NFloodplain and Wetland L - XAssessment for the Site 300 X XEntrance/Exit Corral X -Hollow Road Widening X X XProject Adjacent to the X XLawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site March 15, 2021 Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project Prepared by: Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Environmental Functional Area Water Resources and Environmental Planning Group Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Field Office Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ii Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description.......................................................................................................................... 1 Description of the Project Site ........................................................................................................ 2 Potential Floodplains Impacts ......................................................................................................... 3 Potential Wetlands Impacts............................................................................................................
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California

    Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.