DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastside Max Blue Line

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eastside Max Blue Line BANFIELD LIGHT RAIL EASTSIDE MAX BLUE LINE Background alternative transit scenarios for a busway, carpool/ bus (HOV) lanes, low-cost road improvements and Breaking the mold “no-build.” As the study progressed the community In 1975, the region adopted an Interim Transportation asked that light rail be added as an alternative. In Plan, rejecting previous plans for 54 new highway 1979 light rail was selected by the community and projects at a cost of $2 billion (in 1969 dollars). The participating jurisdictions. Federal approval followed new plan proposed modest roadway projects and a in 1980, making it one of the first federally funded L ar b m o network of transitways along major travel corridors light rail projects. d to meet future demand. By 1976 the Banfield Freeway U.S. Senator Mark Hatfield turned the first spade SMITH AND BYBEE M corridor was selected as the top priority. WETLANDS NATURAL AREA arine of dirt for the Ruby Junction Maintenance Facility The Oregon Department of Transportation asked in 1982, declaring that effective transit in the Newberry PIER Co Expo Center the federal governmentCOLUMBIA RIVER to transfer funds under the PARK lu tland cities should be as much a national priority as m or b P ia 1973 Federal Aid Highway Act from the Mt. Hood the Interstate Highway system. Later that year, PORTLAND N PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL Marine RACEWAY Delta Park/Freeway project to the Banfield. The City of Portland construction of the trackway began in Gresham. Fe ssenden Vanport and Multnomah County had rejected the freeway Portland In September 1986, the Eastside MAX line opened hns Jo International Airport St dge project in 1974 after public outcry over destruction of i Kenton/ MLK town Br for revenue service as one of only three light rail German N Denver Lombar neighborhoods and its expected cost. Many remember d N Lombard systems in the country. Transitits Center defeat and the Interim Transportation Plan as a C Air WILLAMETTE RIVER olum por bi Mt Hood Ave t After the Westside extension opened in 1998, the benchmark in Portland’sa evolution toward a new kind Basin Rosa Parks Cascades entire MAX line stretched 33 miles from Hillsboro Kaiser FOREST PARK of American urban planning and civic development. West Union N Killingsworth and Beaverton in the west, through downtown and Laidlaw Killingsworth COLUMBIA RIVER Cornelius Pass The move to light rail Parkrose/Sumner out to Gresham in the east. When the Airport MAX d Transit Center Evergreen th Yeon Ai N Prescott 82n rpor Marine 85 S Originally the Banfield was conceived as a bus Red Line extension opened in 2001, the Eastside/ ky t 1 BLUE LAKE l i NE PORTLAND Thompson n St Helens San REGIONAL PARK e dy ncoe Evergreen transitway. A Banfield Transitway Study compared Westside line was renamed MAX Blue Line. Overlook MLK BIG FOUR CORNERS Gle e t Park NATURAL AREA hu th S any 5 d 1 r 24th d t Beth 223 Cornell 33r Sandy J o 1s Sandy C Orenco/NW 231st Ave orne rd ll Broadway a ld n H NE 82nd Ave i tfie NW PORTLAND Rose Quarter Lloyd Center/ FAIRVIEW s Hawthorn ornell Halsey to Ha C Transit ConventionCenter CenterNE 11th Ave Halsey 7th r Quatama/ i GovernmentHillsboro Center Central/ Farm 25 GLENN c SE 3rd Transit Center Fair Complex/ NW 205th Ave Hollywood/ OTTO C TROUTDALE o Ba Gateway/NE 99th Ave t WOOD seline s Main Hillsboro Airport l NE 42nd Ave u AUDUBON Transit Center 1 m SANCUTARIES NE 60th Ave 8 VILLAGE / Transit Center Glisan 1 e b Oak 158th id d s Kings Hill/ tal T rn i u a r o B NE 7th Ave E 102nd Ave Glisan SW Salmon St E 122nd Ave o d ngton/ o R es E 148th Ave E 162nd Ave E 181st Ave u w th Ave n t i r an v 2th d ashi 2 W 1th k a ty Hospi al r e 1 Murray B 1 li W k Stark a r o e G Rockwood/E 188th Ave Willow Creek/ r SE 1 l H ua o HILLSBORO Sunset e T w r Goose Hollow/ SW 185th Ave Washingt E 172nd Ave Stark B Washington on SE 8th Ave Transit Center SW Jeerson St Stark y Transit Center Park d Ruby Junction/E 197th Ave JACKSON BOTTOM Hawthorne MT TABOR Elmonica/ PARK Burnside WETLANDS Merlo Rd/ 82n PRESERVE th T SW 170th Ave SW 158th Ave d u 85 alati 2nd n V 1 alley Hwy Je 2 nd nkins th 1 50th 62n Cornelius Pass 82 Civic Drive Beaverton 1 Division 48 s ane l 1 l 1 TUALATIN HILLS Creek i K NATURE PARK H Division r n a tto Cleveland d Pa Cesar Chavez Gresham City Hall e Ave C Beaverton Tualatin Vall Transit Center on Powell ey Millikan Cany P Gresham Central Hwy MARQUAM owell Way SW PORTLAND NATURE PARK SE PORTLAND Transit Center Beaverton-Hill Beaverton sdale Hwy R Central o b 209th e P 229th o M r well MAX Blue LineM light rail service connects Hillsboro, Beaverton, Portland City Center, East Portland t Valley s aca c L POWELL BUTTE Hogan o u NATURE PARK Lusted d BEAVERTON g amand Gresham. h JENNE Allen l i n W oo BUTTE dstock GRESHAM Orient on SE Bybee SPRINGWATER CORRIDOR y OAKS les a BOTTOM r B Farmington 170th O r ry WILDLIFE Hall r REFUGE a nd e r Mu b Multnomah a r 282 ls F a ur b BUTTES W r hol e e ar NATURAL lc B h TOWLE n Sc SE Tacoma/ AREA g M BUTTE e d o Johnson Creek u WILLAMETTE R th Johnson Creek nt Scott Hall/Nimbus NATIONAL Taylors 82n 90 Brockman Washington Square CEMETARY 1 SPRINGWATER WILLAMETTE RIVER Mount Hood Capitol Taylors Ferry th Transit Center Ferry RIVER VIEW CORRIDOR NATURAL 90 AREA 1 EAST Barbur Blvd BLISS COOPER Transit Center SE Fuller nd BUTTE MOUNTAIN 32 NATURE PARK 1 145th King Barbur Idleman d 72n King 1 121st G Milwaukie/ MILWAUKIE th reen TRYON CREEK Main y nd b rr C h STATE 35 e u K a t e F 1 rg r r s NATURAL AREA r 5 e n e 222 7 v o d e Clackamas Town Center 1 o i r 129th B s /H r w Transit Center Tigard e y HAPPY v 2 W i 12 alnut Transit Center R Lake Harmony VALLEY lls Ferry Scho SE Park Sunnybrook TIGARD 82n S 9 MOUNT TALBERT unn DAMASCUS 7 ys Co d NATURE PARK ide K un Kellogg Creek th ru try Club Gaarde se Way Bull Mountain Johnson 2nd Lake Oswego 2 Bonita LAKE 1 Transit Center Thiessen OSWEGO W Clackamas-Boring e OSWEGO LAKE b s s Carman McLoughlin t r e Hall ey r ge d Oa C f Ben Durham l o e McV Be Sou Carver/Hwy 212 a th Sh tfi Roots c R ore th k e r Boones Ferry l a e oy d 35 m 1 R a Jennifer nd s / COOK isigg H nnings 232 PARK w Riv Je Am e y W r 2 2 HERITAGE PINE illamett 82nd 4 NATURAL AREA Tualatin rive D r e e Cl TUALATIN RIVER GLADSTONE v a i c fic Hwy 4th ka NATIONAL ci R 2 m Pa a WILDLIFE REFUGE 1 Tualatin s s/Hwy 224 a m TUALATIN MARY S. YOUNG a NORTH LOGAN k STATE c CLACKAMAS RIVER NATURAL AREA RECREATION AREA la d C oo akers Ferry BARTON rw Sagert B PARK he t in- S J r t Tuala o h n we WEST l s Langer o E n LINN egon RIVER ISLAND Or 65th Holcomb Sp B rin o gw r at l e a Salamo r n d Oregon City Transit Center d SHERWOOD or Boones Ferry ta Sunset S lls l l a i F Sc te H h t Redland ae Willame OREGON C d e a d r CITY s a c L a Mou McLoughlin Mo NEWELL d Ba s ntain CREEK e k l e e a CANYON c t ll le fi r e CANEMAH ap ci P WILLAMETTE RIVERBLUFF a M a L P d t el n in an o P l d a COFFEE LAKE WILSONVILLE tr South E n CREEK e WETLANDS C Bea v e WILLAMETTE rcr NARROWS ee FOREST k Wilsonville Design highlights New territory In 1979, modern light rail was still a new and largely untried concept in the U.S. TriMet assembled an in-house staff to learn light rail technology, and then managed the project with the assistance of engineering design consultants. The project needed to draw on the best practices in the U.S. as well as Europe—where most of the expertise in light rail resided at that time. The entire Banfield project consisted of widening five miles of the Banfield Freeway (I-84) from four to six lanes, and constructing a 15-mile light rail line from Gateway Transit Center provides light rail and bus Gresham to Downtown Portland. service and is adjacent to the Oregon Clinic, a transit-oriented development. Traffic preempt system Early on, TriMet adopted a design policy that trains should only stop at stations, and traffic crossings should be preempted whenever possible to prevent trains from being mired in traffic delays. Pedestrian safety The construction of the light rail median on Burnside Street created a pedestrian barrier through some neighborhoods.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    Transit Strategies Light Rail Transit (LRT) Light rail transit (LRT) is electrified rail service that operates in urban environments in completely exclusive rights‐of‐way, in exclusive lanes on roadways, and in some cases in mixed traffic. Most often, it uses one to three car trains and serves high volume corridors at higher speeds than local bus and streetcar service. Design and operational elements of LRT include level boarding, off‐board fare payment, and traffic signal priority. Stations are typically spaced farther apart than those of local transit services and are usually situated where there are higher population and employment densities. MAX Light Rail (Portland, OR) The T Light Rail (Pittsburgh, PA) Characteristics of LRT Service LRT is popular with passengers for a number of reasons, the most important of which are that service is fast, frequent, direct, and operates from early morning to late night. These attributes make service more convenient—much more convenient than regular bus service—and more competitive with travel by automobile. Characteristics of LRT service include: . Frequent service, typically every 10 minutes or better . Long spans of service, often 18 hours a day or more . Direct service along major corridors . Fast service Keys reasons that service is fast are the use of exclusive rights‐of‐way—exclusive lanes in the medians of roadways, in former rail rights‐of‐way, and in subways—and that stations are spaced further apart than with bus service, typically every half mile (although stations are often spaced more closely within downtown areas). Rhode Island Transit Master Plan | 1 Differences between LRT and Streetcar Light rail and streetcar service are often confused, largely because they share many similarities.
    [Show full text]
  • Informing Subterranean Transit Station Design from Existing And
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 6-12-2019 Informing Subterranean Transit Station Design from Existing and Future Station Typologies; an Informative Exploration of how to Develop Underground Station Design for MAX Light Rail Antonio P. Ramos-Crosier Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ramos-Crosier, Antonio P., "Informing Subterranean Transit Station Design from Existing and Future Station Typologies; an Informative Exploration of how to Develop Underground Station Design for MAX Light Rail" (2019). University Honors Theses. Paper 797. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.815 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Informing Subterranean Transit Station Design from Existing and Future Station Typologies; an Informative Exploration of how to Develop Underground Station Design for MAX Light Rail Image 1: MAX Red line crossing the Steel Bridge, which is a key piece of infrastructure that the regional connector aims to avoid with the implementation of a new tunnel. Image taken by Antonio Crosier. By: Antonio Ramos-Crosier Advisor: Jeff Schnabel 1 MAX Regional Connector Ramos-Crosier Research Question: In anticipation of TriMet and the City
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 19 503 Issue 2 Spring 2014 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2014 dues were due Jan 1, 2014. Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson....................1 Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News.......................2 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretative Center Update Greg Bonn....................................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Red Trolleys in the Sun Mark Kavanagh..................................5 application by clicking: Become a Member MAX Yellow Line Lou Bowerman ..............................................6 Seattle Transit Update Roy Bonn................................................7 Tucson Sun Link Update Roy Bonn............................................9 See this issue in color on line DC Streetcar Update Roy Bonn..............................................10 at oerhs.org/transfer Pacific Northwest Transit Update Roy Bonn..............................10 Spotlight on Members: Hal Rosene ..........................................11 Trolleys Through the Timber Oregon’s Small Town Streetcar Systems By Richard Thompson The following article is excerpted from Richard's upcoming book, “Trolleys Through the Timber: Oregon's Small Town Streetcar Systems.” As the working title indicates, it will focus upon streetcars outside of Portland. This new endeavor will allow the author to further develop information about small town streetcar systems that previously appeared in his online Oregon Encyclopedia entries, and his four books for Arcadia Publishing. By the turn of the 20th century the Small town streetcar systems often relied on secondhand rolling stock. This interurban- street railway had become a vital part of like Forest Grove Transportation Company car is thought to have started life as a trailer urban transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • I-205/Portland Mall: MAX Green Line Fact Sheet
    I-205/Portland Mall: Expo Center Airport N MAX Green Line Portland Hillsboro Maintenance facility Ruby Junction Beaverton Gresham Snapshots Background Milwaukie Funding Ridership Since the beginning of light rail planning in the Clackamas Portland region, transportation planners have worked Sept. 2009–June 2010 (first year of service) – 4.9 million Wilsonville Total: $575.7 million toward reaching two goals—bringing light rail service FY11 – 6.9 million to Clackamas County for the first time and creating a of this activity meant that buses could not use 5th FY12 – 7.5 million north-south light rail alignment in downtown Portland. and 6th avenues during the two-and-a-half years of construction. After conducting extensive public outreach The Portland Mall opened in 1978, providing bus service $413.4 million and traffic analysis with the City of Portland, TriMet Frequency with a dedicated alignment on several blocks of 5th $23 million Federal created a bus relocation plan. State Approximately every 15 minutes during peak hours; and 6th avenues in downtown Portland. Meanwhile, approximately every 35 minutes during early morning in 1983 the completion of the northern portion of Twenty-eight bus lines that used the Portland Mall and nighttime service. Interstate 205 included a transitway parallel to much of were temporarily relocated to other downtown streets, $139.3 million the highway as it passed through Multnomah County. As the bulk of them moving to 3rd and 4th avenues. The Local Travel times the years passed, the need for high capacity transit to temporary routes included signage and shelters. When Clackamas Town Center–Gateway 16 minutes Clackamas County and on a new downtown alignment major construction ended in May 2009, buses moved Clackamas Town Center–Downtown Portland only increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Each with Its Own Distinctive Personality and Style, PORTLAND's
    THE GET READY FOR YOUR 34 DOWNTOWN way to NEXT 35 OLD TOWN CHINATOWN 36 NORTHWEST PORTLAND 37 PEARL DISTRICT 38 CENTRAL EASTSIDE 39 HAWTHORNE/BELMONT . 40 DIVISION/CLINTON “10 Best in U.S.” 41 ALBERTA ARTS DISTRICT –Fodor’s Travel STREET42 MISSISSIPPI/WILLIAMS -TripAdvisor Each with its own SCENE distinctive personality and style, PORTLAND’S NEIGHBORHOODS add character to the city. ney St Pearl District NW Irving St NW Irving St ve ve A A A th oyt St th NW Hoyt St 6 6 ve ve A A Couch Park A W 1 W N St th NW Glisan St th NW Glisan 5 W 1 W N NW Flanders St ders St TRAVELPORTLAND.COM verett St NW Everett St COME VISIT US! ve e A l NW Davis St v P A Newberg, Oregon th 4 h KEEN Garage Portland t nity 0 i r 2 W 1 NW Couch St T 503.625.7385 N 505 NW 13th AVE NW NW vistaballoon.com NW W Burnside St Portland OR, 97209 405 SW ve PHOTOGRAPH BY AMYPHOTOGRAPH OUELLETTEBY ANKENY ALLEY IN OLD TOWN CHINATOWN A 33 JELD- h 3t 1 e Smith Lake Lake Force North Portland Harbor Smith Lake Columbia Slough Lake Force Columbia River Smith and Bybee Lakes Park North Portland Harbor N Swift Hwy Columbia Slough Delta Park Slough Columbia Slough Portland Intl Airport Columbia Slough Drainage Canal Drainage Canal Columbia Slough Columbia Slough Columbia Slough an Island Basin Sw Columbia Slough Columbia Slo ugh Columbia Columbia Slough Slough Beach Elem. School EAT PLAY The 1 Alder Street food cart pod (S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS and the MYTHS of TRACKLESS TRAMS January 2020 by Marie Verschuer Prepared As a Supplement of Sbenrc 1.62 Sustainable Centres for Tomorrow
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND THE MYTHS OF TRACKLESS TRAMS January 2020 By Marie Verschuer Prepared as a supplement of SBEnrc 1.62 Sustainable Centres for Tomorrow PURPOSE The following list of frequently asked questions have been compiled to assist those interested in Trackless Trams better understand the advantages and limitation of the technology and the areas where further research is needed. Information has been sourced from manufacturers, literature review and from study tours conducted in 2018 and 2019 to view and evaluate the emergent and latest technology suited to the provision of mid-tier prioritised public transit. This FAQ document is ancillary to the reports and case studies prepared as part of the SBNRC 1.62 Sustainable Centres for Tomorrow research project. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. What is a trackless tram (TT)? A trackless tram is a rubber tyred, high capacity vehicle suited to a corridor transit system equivalent to light rail. The vehicle in its design and internal layout is more closely aligned to a tram or light rail vehicle than to a bus as it has six innovations from High Speed Rail that have been transferred across. It travels in a dedicated corridor and should have signal priority to ensure smooth running free of traffic congestion. It is a smooth ride quality as it has sensors that anticipate bumps in the road so the vehicle adjusts its rail-like bogeys. It is a quiet electric vehicle with batteries on the roof. It has wide doors typically 2 per carriage, one each side. Boarding is from all doors adjacent to the platform.
    [Show full text]
  • LRT) Is Electric Urban Rail Service That Typically Operates in Exclusive Rights-Of-Way
    Light rail transit (LRT) is electric urban rail service that typically operates in exclusive rights-of-way. Most often, it uses one to three car trains and is designed to serve high volume corridors at higher speeds than a local bus or streetcar service. Design and operational elements of LRT include level boarding, off-board fare payment, and traffic signal priority. Stations are typically spaced farther apart than those of local transit services and are usually situated where there are higher population and employment densities. While longer stop spacing can increase walking distances for some riders, people are typically willing to walk farther to reach transit if service is fast and frequent. What is now known as light rail evolved from the streetcar services of the late 1800s as those services began to be provided with exclusive rights-of-way to avoid severe congestion in mixed traffic on surface streets. In 1897, Boston’s Tremont Street Subway, which is now part of the MBTA’s Green Line, was the first streetcar line to be placed in a tunnel, and, in effect, became the nation’s first light rail line. While light rail has a long history in older cities, it became increasingly popular beginning in the 1980s as a way for newer cities to obtain many of the benefits of rapid transit/subway systems at a lower cost through mostly surface operation. According to the Transportation Research Board, today’s systems can be categorized into two types: 1. “First Generation systems that evolved from earlier trolley and tramway lines that remained in operation throughout their transformation [as in Boston].
    [Show full text]
  • MAX Red Line Extension and Reliability Improvements Profile
    MAX Red Line Extension and Reliability Improvements Portland, Oregon Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2019) Summary Description Proposed Project: Light Rail Transit 7.8 Miles, 10 Stations Total Capital Cost ($YOE): $206.02 Million Section 5309 CIG Share ($YOE): $100.00 Million (48.5%) Annual Operating Cost (opening year 2023): $6.62 Million Existing Corridor Ridership (Warranted): 20,000 Daily Linked Trips Overall Project Rating: Medium-High Project Justification Rating: Medium Local Financial Commitment Rating: High Project Description: The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) proposes to increase the reliability of the entire MAX light rail system between Portland International Airport and Beaverton Transit Center. The proposed system will extend the existing Red Line service from Beaverton Transit Center to Downtown Hillsboro and improve capacity constraints on the existing system. The project includes track, switch, and signalization work; construction of an operator break facility at the Fair Complex/ Hillsboro Airport Station; double-tracking at the Gateway Transit Center and Portland International Airport Station area, construction of a new storage track at Ruby Junction Rail Yard, and the purchase of six new light rail vehicles. The service is planned to operate 19.5 hours every day, with trains every 7.5 minutes during peak, off-peak and evening hours both during weekdays and weekends. Project Purpose: Currently the west side of the MAX system in the Beaverton area is overcrowded. The single-track segments on the eastern side of the existing MAX system at Portland International Airport and Gateway Transit Center through which all lines of the system travel impose system-wide scheduling constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY
    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of TriMet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY 50 YEARS OF TRIMET AND TRANSIT IN THE PORTLAND REGION CONTENTS Foreword: 50 Years of Transit Creating Livable Communities . 1 Setting the Stage for Doing Things Differently . 2 Portland, Oregon’s Legacy of Transit . 4 Beginnings ............................................................................4 Twentieth Century .....................................................................6 Transit’s Decline. 8 Bucking National Trends in the Dynamic 1970s . 11 New Institutions for a New Vision .......................................................12 TriMet Is Born .........................................................................14 Shifting Gears .........................................................................17 The Freeway Revolt ....................................................................18 Sidebar: The TriMet and City of Portland Partnership .......................................19 TriMet Turbulence .....................................................................22 Setting a Course . 24 Capital Program ......................................................................25 Sidebar: TriMet Early Years and the Mount Hood Freeway ...................................29 The Banfield Project ...................................................................30 Sidebar: The Transportation Managers Advisory Committee ................................34 Sidebar: Return to Sender ..............................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected]
    January–June 2002 • $10.00 / Portland Progress Report: The Portland Streetcar, Airport MAX and More The Magazine of Electric Railways Published since 1939 by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. Volume 65, Number 1–6 January–June, 2002 JANUARY Staff editor and art director JUNE Sandy Campbell contributors COLUMNS Raymond R. Berger, James N. J. Henwood, 2002 Frank S. Miklos News Electric Railroaders’ Streetcars proposed for Washington, D.C., Grove Street Extension 3 Association, Inc. opens in Bloomfi eld, N.J., and other transit news from around the world. E Book Reviews Offi cers & Directors James N. J. Henwood reviews Arkansas Valley Interurban: 8 president The Electric Way by Robert Collins. Frank S. Miklos first vice president Charles A. Akins FEATURE second vice president; corresponding secretary Raymond R. Berger Portland Progress Report third vice president; recording secretary Frank S. Miklos returns to Portland, Ore. to report on the new 10 William K. Guild Portland Streetcar line, MAX extensions and Vintage Trolley happenings. director Randy Litz ON THE COVER treasurer Michael Glikin Vintage Trolley in Portland, Oregon. Replica vintage car 513 rounds the bend librarian on N.W. Lovejoy Street and N.W. 11th Avenue. frank s. miklos. Richard C. Evans Interstate MAX Construction. Portland Tri-Met MAX Blue Line car 118, trip & convention chairman Jack May outbound from Hillsboro (below), passes the Interstate MAX under construction membership secretary at N.E. Interstate Avenue and N.E. Holladay Street. raymond r. berger Lewis Hitch National Headquarters Grand Central Terminal, Room 4A, New York City Mailing Address P.O. Box 3323, Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163-3323 Website electricrailroaders.org E-Mail [email protected] Subscriptions Headlights is sent free to members of the ERA.
    [Show full text]