National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Property Tax Payments by Credit Card Are Available Online, at Each Satellite Office and the Courthouse Office
Property Tax Payments by credit card are available online, at each satellite office and the courthouse office. Credit card payments may also be made by calling a toll free telephone number - 1-866-549-1010 * New E-check payments are available online only. Contact: Lynda Hall Madison County Tax Collector Telephone: (256) 532-3370 [email protected] *Important Note: When paying by credit card, there is a 2.4% convenience fee for credit card payments added to your tax bill. For E-checks the fee is a flat $1.50 per check (E-checks are taken online only). These fees go directly to the credit card processing company for processing costs. You can go on line at http://www.madisoncountyal.gov/paytaxes/ You must use your PPIN # which appears on your tax bill and provide owner information and location of your property. Credit card payments are accepted at all Tax Collector locations when paying in person. E-checks can only be processed online by our taxpayers. When calling 1-866-549-1010 you must provide your PPIN# that appears on your tax bill you received by mail. You will need a bureau code: 5323370, that identifies Madison County Alabama property records. There is a Spanish speaking option for taxpayers. You can also pay your tax bill that is due by December 31st, by coming in person to the Madison County Tax Collections office on the first floor of the Madison County Courthouse, Room 116 downtown Huntsville or to any of the outlying satellite offices – Flint Crossing – Merdianville/Highway 231/431 – County Office Suite K Parkway Place Mall – 2801 Memorial Parkway – Back side of Mall, 1st Floor by Belk Madison – 100 Plaza Blvd – Off Browns Ferry, Near Hughes Road If paying your tax bill in person, you may do so by: cash, personal check, money order, cashiers check, certified check or credit card. -
RACE, SPACE, and PLACE: the RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, and GENTRIFICATION Keith A
RACE, SPACE, AND PLACE: THE RELATION BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL MODERNISM, POST-MODERNISM, URBAN PLANNING, AND GENTRIFICATION Keith Aoki * [Cite as: 20 Fordham Urb. L.J. 699 (1993)] Introduction Gentrification in United States urban housing markets of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s continues to be a controversial and complex phenomenon. [FN1] During the past twenty years, gentrification's effects on the core cities of the U.S. have been analyzed and evaluated many times over. [FN2] Descriptions of gentrification have spanned the ideological *700 spectrum, from laudatory embraces of gentrification as the solution to urban decline to denunciatory critiques of gentrification as another symptom of the widening gulf between the haves and the have- nots in America. [FN3] This Article critiques gentrification, adding an additional explanatory element to the ongoing account of the dynamics of American cities in the 1990s. The additional element is the relevance of a major aesthetic realignment in architecture and urban planning from a modernist to a post-modernist ideology in the 1970s and 1980s. This shift involved an aesthetic and economic revaluation of historical elements in older central city buildings, which accelerated the rate of gentrification, displacement, and abandonment. This Article describes how certain shifts in the aesthetic ideology [FN4] of urban planners and architects affected suburban and urban spatial distribution in the United States during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. These ideological shifts arose from deeply embedded American attitudes toward city and rural life that had emerged in American town planning and architectural theory and practice by the mid-nineteenth century. Part I of this Article examines the emergence of an anti-urban Arcadian strand in nineteenth century American town planning rhetoric. -
Huntsville, Alabama a City Moving Forward
Huntsville, Alabama A City Moving Forward Huntsville Diverse Demographics The City of Huntsville is one of the most recognized cities in the Southeast – consistently named as one of the best places to live, work, and expand a business by a variety of national publications. Our City is regularly named as a premier location for both business and quality of life. Huntsville successfully combines the rich heritage of Southern hospitality with innovative high-tech ventures and cultural diversity. FASTEST GROWING With persistent job growth and solid public infrastructure, Huntsville is METRO IN ALABAMA the regional leader in providing North Alabama with employment opportunities, retail destinations, and healthcare services. All of this adds up to a growing population. The Huntsville MSA has accounted for 24% of Alabama’s population growth over the last decade. $75,348 MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME INCOME 66.2% POPULATION WITH COLLEGE DEGREES Huntsville MSA Population Density 5 Mile 10 Mile 25 Mile 50 Mile 110,164 265,437 543,671 1,114,812 Huntsville MSA Average Household Income 36.5 5 Mile 10 Mile 25 Mile 50 Mile MEDIAN AGE $60,777 $74,940 $70,870 $61,961 Huntsville Regional Employment Center The City of Huntsville is the Regional Employment Center of North Alabama. Not only does Huntsville provide employment options for the 550,000 citizens within the MSA area, but the overall workforce is comprised of 14 Counties in Alabama and 4 in Southern Tennessee. 110,000 Due to the great transportation infrastructure within the Huntsville MSA, 110,000 regional commuters travel into the City each day for COMMUTERS DAILY employment from these surrounding areas. -
Property Alert!
Property Alert! Innovative Solutions for the Retail Industry For more information, Spence J. Mehl Or visit please contact: T: 212.300.5375 www.rcsrealestate.com E: [email protected] Bankruptcy Sale of Leases (Subject to Bankruptcy Court approval) # Property Address City State Sq. Ft # Property Address City State Sq. Ft 233 Colonial Mall Gadsden Gadsden AL 3,165 1138 Savannah Outlets Pooler GA 3,500 577 Parkway Place Huntsville AL 3,545 926 Ave Webb Gin Snellville GA 3,467 444 Central Mall Fort Smith AR 2,920 576 Colonial Mall Valdosta Valdosta GA 3,371 828 Turtle Creek Aeropostale Jonesboro AR 3,500 757 Lindale Mall Cedar Rapids IA 3,668 612 Superstition Springs Mesa AZ 3,310 41 River Oaks Center Calumet City IL 2,778 3383 Mariposa PS Nogales AZ 5,047 1071 Outlet Shoppes At Fremont Fremont IN 4,026 1059 Outlets at Anthem Phoenix AZ 4,733 804 Metropolis Mall Plainfield IN 3,300 788 Santa Anita Aeropostale Arcadia CA 3,335 238 Honey Creek Terre Haute IN 3,640 880 Topanga Plaza Canoga Park CA 3,907 558 Towne West Square Wichita KS 3,180 855 Capitola Aeropostale Capitola CA 3,415 334 Ashland Town Center Ashland KY 3,308 1022 The Shoppes At Chino Hill Chino Hills CA 3,859 933 Hamburg Pavilion Lexington KY 4,000 909 Puente Hills Aeropostale Industry CA 3,419 1129 The Outlet Shoppes Of the Blue Simpsonville KY 3,960 Grass 1108 South Bay Galleria Redondo CA 3,601 1109 Riverwalk New Orleans LA 6,000 Beach 1102 Promenade at Temecula Temecula CA 3,433 339 The Mall at Whitney Field Leominster MA 3,548 169 Sangertown Mall New Hartford CT 4,069 -
Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing for Bankruptcy 04/20
Case 21-31717 Document 1 Filed in TXSB on 05/26/21 Page 1 of 54 Fill in this information to identify the case: United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas Case number (if known): Chapter 11 Check if this is an amended filing Official Form 201 Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing for Bankruptcy 04/20 If more space is needed, attach a separate sheet to this form. On the top of any additional pages, write the debtor’s name and the case number (if known). For more information, a separate document, Instructions for Bankruptcy Forms for Non-Individuals, is available. 1. Debtor’s name Laredo Outlet Shoppes, LLC 2. All other names debtor used N/A in the last 8 years Include any assumed names, trade names, and doing business as names 3. Debtor’s federal Employer Identification Number (EIN) 81-1563566 4. Debtor’s address Principal place of business Mailing address, if different from principal place of business 2030 Hamilton Place Blvd. Number Street Number Street CBL Center, Suite 500 P.O. Box Chattanooga Tennessee 37421 City State ZIP Code City State ZIP Code Location of principal assets, if different from principal place of business Hamilton County County 1600 Water Street Number Street Laredo Texas 78040 City State ZIP Code 5. Debtor’s website (URL) www.cblproperties.com 6. Type of debtor ☒ Corporation (including Limited Liability Company (LLC) and Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)) ☐ Partnership (excluding LLP) ☐ Other. Specify: Official Form 201 Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing for Bankruptcy Page 1 WEIL:\97969900\8\32626.0004 Case 21-31717 Document 1 Filed in TXSB on 05/26/21 Page 2 of 54 Debtor Laredo Outlet Shoppes, LLC Case number (if known) 21-_____ ( ) Name A. -
271 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 20-13076-BLS Doc 271 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------------ x : In re: : Chapter 11 : FRANCESCA’S HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Case No. 20-13076 (BLS) 1 : et al., : : Debtors. Jointly Administered : : Re: D.I. 45, 266 ------------------------------------------------------------ x NOTICE OF POTENTIAL ASSUMPTION AND ASSIGNMENT OF EXECUTORY CONTRACTS OR UNEXPIRED LEASES AND CURE AMOUNTS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT: 1. The above-captioned debtors (collectively, the “Debtors”) each filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”) on December 3, 2020. 2. On December 4, 2020, the Debtors filed the Motion of Debtors for Entry of Orders (I)(A) Approving Bidding Procedures for Sale of Substantially All of the Debtors’ Assets, (B) Approving Process for Designation of Stalking Horse Bidder and Provision of Bid Protections, (C) Scheduling Auction for, and Hearing to Approve, Sale of Substantially All of the Debtors’ Assets, (D) Approving Form and Manner of Notices of Sale, Auction and Sale Hearing, (E) Approving Assumption and Assignment Procedures and (F) Granting Related Relief and (II)(A) Approving Sale of Substantially All of the Debtors’ Assets Free and Clear of All Liens, Claims, Interests and Encumbrances, (B) Approving Assumption and Assignment of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases -
Architectural Styles/Types
Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings. -
Specialty Retailer & Restaurants Opening 2018
SHOPS AT Located between Whole Foods-anchored The Shops at Merchants Walk and Parkway Place Mall, along Memorial Parkway at Bob Wallace Avenue. The epicenter of a renaissance happening in Downtown Huntsville and along the Specialty RetailerMemorial & Restaurants Parkway corridor, Merchants OpeningWalk 2018 and Merchants Square are catalyst developments that extend the boundary of the already vibrant Parkway Place Mall. HIGHLIGHTS Location: Bob Wallace Avenue & Memorial Parkway Huntsville, AL 35801, Madison County Traffic Counts: 120,890 AADT Memorial Parkway 21,200 AADT Bob Wallace Avenue Total GLA in Shopping Center: 43,200 ±Square Feet Parking: ±467 Spaces Whole Foods Trade Area: 561,467 individuals with 224,009 households Demographics: 4 Mile 15 Min Population 87,171 249,846 Average HH Income $65,679 $68,254 Max Grelier 256.489.4157 [email protected] REXCP.com No warranty or representation, express or implied, has been made as to the accuracy of the information provided herein, and no liability is assumed for errors or omissions. Huntsville, Alabama SUMMARY 100 A - Ulta (10,417 sq ft) 100 B - J Whitener (2,185 sq ft) 100 C - Available (2,499 sq ft) 100 D - Available (2,197 sq ft) 100 E - Chuy’s (7,142 sq ft) TOTAL Building 100 = 24,440 sq ft 45’ ASPEN ±21 DENTAL SPACES ±3.5K TOTAL 78’ ULTA T 200 A1 - Char (6,000 sq ft) 10,417 SF 2 4 TRANSFORMER 15 200 A2 - Available (1, 554 sq ft) DUMPSTER J WHITENER BOUTIQUE 200 B1 - Brass Tap (3,502 sq ft) 2,185 SF TENANT 2,499 SF CHAR 6,000 SF 200 B2 - Available (3,886 sq ft) TENANT 2,197 SF TENANT TOTAL Building 200 = 14,942 sq ft 1,554 SF MERCHANTS SQUARE CHUY’S 7,142 SF CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN BRASS TAP HUNTSVILLE, AL 3,502 SF 1.12.18 Building 300 - Aspen Dental (3,500 sq ft) TENANT 3,886 SF TOTAL Merchants Square = 43,200 sq ft PARKING On Grade - 233 18’ Level - 115 29’ Level - 119 TOTAL = ±467 Spaces No warranty or representation, express or implied, has been made as to the accuracy of the information provided herein, and no liability is assumed for errors or omissions. -
CBL & Associates Properties 2012 Annual Report
COVER PROPERTIES : Left to Right/Top to Bottom MALL DEL NORTE, LAREDO, TX CROSS CREEK MALL, FAYETTEVILLE, NC BURNSVILLE CENTER, BURNSVILLE, MN OAK PARK MALL, KANSAS CITY, KS CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. 2012 Annual When investors, business partners, retailers Report CBL & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES, INC. and shoppers think of CBL they think of the leading owner of market-dominant malls in CORPORATE OFFICE BOSTON REGIONAL OFFICE DALLAS REGIONAL OFFICE ST. LOUIS REGIONAL OFFICE the U.S. In 2012, CBL once again demon- CBL CENTER WATERMILL CENTER ATRIUM AT OFFICE CENTER 1200 CHESTERFIELD MALL THINK SUITE 500 SUITE 395 SUITE 750 CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017-4841 strated why it is thought of among the best 2030 HAMILTON PLACE BLVD. 800 SOUTH STREET 1320 GREENWAY DRIVE (636) 536-0581 THINK 2012 Annual Report CHATTANOOGA, TN 37421-6000 WALTHAM, MA 02453-1457 IRVING, TX 75038-2503 CBLCBL & &Associates Associates Properties Properties, 2012 Inc. Annual Report companies in the shopping center industry. (423) 855-0001 (781) 398-7100 (214) 596-1195 CBLPROPERTIES.COM HAMILTON PLACE, CHATTANOOGA, TN: Our strategy of owning the The 2012 CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. Annual Report saved the following resources by printing on paper containing dominant mall in SFI-00616 10% postconsumer recycled content. its market helps attract in-demand new retailers. At trees waste water energy solid waste greenhouse gases waterborne waste Hamilton Place 5 1,930 3,217,760 214 420 13 Mall, Chattanooga fully grown gallons million BTUs pounds pounds pounds shoppers enjoy the market’s only Forever 21. COVER PROPERTIES : Left to Right/Top to Bottom MALL DEL NORTE, LAREDO, TX CROSS CREEK MALL, FAYETTEVILLE, NC BURNSVILLE CENTER, BURNSVILLE, MN OAK PARK MALL, KANSAS CITY, KS CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. -
Architecture Overview and Activities
Educational Material Architecture Overview and Activities What is architecture? As defined by Merriam-Webster architecture is: 1. the art or science of building, specifically: the art or practice of designing and building structures and especially habitable ones. 2. a: formation or construction resulting from or as if from a conscious act (the architecture of the garden) b: a unifying or coherent form or structure (the novel lacks architecture) 3. architectural product or work. 4. a method or style of building. 5. the manner in which the components of a computer or computer system are organized and integrated Architectural style refers to the visual appearance of a building and not its function. Style is often influenced by values and aspirations held by a society or a community. Certain designs may serve as metaphors or symbols of what a particular group of people value, of what they consider important. For example, when the Pilgrims first settled in Massachusetts in 1620 they built structures that served their immediate needs: shelter and places of worship. Creating these particular buildings reflected their collective desire for a new home (building a house creates a feeling of permanence and stability) and freedom to worship as they liked. As more people settled in America they brought their own cultural styles and ideas which have continued to influence architectural design. Who Builds Great Buildings? Most of the world’s great buildings have been designed by architects. But there are many other buildings, including many homes, which were built by builders with no architectural training. These builders have sometimes used published plans created by architects or have created their own. -
Frank Lloyd Wright's
Usonia, N E W Y O R K PROOF 1 Usonia, N E W Y O R K Building a Community with Frank Lloyd Wright ROLAND REISLEY with John Timpane Foreword by MARTIN FILLER PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL PRESS, NEW YORK PROOF 2 PUBLISHED BY This publication was supported in part with PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL PRESS funds from the New York State Council on the 37 EAST SEVENTH STREET Arts, a state agency. NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10003 Special thanks to: Nettie Aljian, Ann Alter, Amanda For a free catalog of books, call 1.8... Atkins, Janet Behning, Jan Cigliano, Jane Garvie, Judith Visit our web site at www.papress.com. Koppenberg, Mark Lamster, Nancy Eklund Later, Brian McDonald, Anne Nitschke, Evan Schoninger, © Princeton Architectural Press Lottchen Shivers, and Jennifer Thompson of Princeton All rights reserved Architectural Press—Kevin C. Lippert, publisher Printed in China First edition Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Reisley, Roland, – No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any Usonia, New York : building a community with manner without written permission from the publisher Frank Lloyd Wright / Roland Reisley with John except in the context of reviews. Timpane ; foreword by Martin Filler. p. cm. Every reasonable attempt has been made to identify isbn --- owners of copyright. Errors or omissions will be corrected . Usonian houses—New York (State)—Pleasant- in subsequent editions. ville. Utopias—New York (State)—Pleasantville— History. Architecture, Domestic—New York All photographs © Roland Reisley unless otherwise (State)—Pleasantville. Wright, Frank Lloyd, indicated. –—Criticism and interpretation. i. Title: Usonia. ii. Timpane, John Philip. iii. -
Architectural Findings
Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.