DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-Y010-2017-0240-EA March 2018 Competitive Oil and Gas Lease Sale Location: Canyon Country District, Moab & Monticello Field Offices Grand & San Juan Counties, Utah Applicant/Address: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Utah State Office 440 West 200 South, Suite 500 Salt Lake City, Utah 84145-0155 Moab Field Office 82 East Dogwood Moab, Utah 84532 Office (435) 259-2100 Fax (435) 259-2158 Monticello Field Office 365 North Main, P.O. Box 7 Monticello, Utah 84535 Office (435) 587-1500 Fax (435) 587-1518 November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION .............................................. 1 1.2 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................................................... 3 1.4 PLAN CONFORMANCE REVIEW .............................................................................. 4 1.5 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................ 6 1.6 RELATIONSHIP TO STATUTES, REGULATIONS, POLICIES OR OTHER PLANS ....................................................................................................................................... 7 1.7 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ................................................ 8 CHAPTER 2 - ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................... 9 2.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 9 2.2 REASONABLY FORESEEABLE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO ............................ 9 2.3 ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN DETAIL .............................................................. 14 2.4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT NOT ANALYZED IN DETAIL ............... 15 CHAPTER 3 – AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT....................................................................... 15 3.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 15 3.2 GENERAL SETTING .................................................................................................... 16 3.3 RESOURCES/ISSUES BROUGHT FORWARD FOR ANALYSIS ......................... 16 CHAPTER 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .................................................................... 32 4.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 32 4.2 DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMPACTS ......................................................................... 32 4.3 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ........................................................................................... 66 CHAPTER 5 – COORDINATION AND CONSULTATION ................................................ 70 5.1 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION .......................................................................................... 70 5.2 LIST OF PERSONS, AGENCIES, AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED......... 72 5.3 LIST OF PREPARERS AND PARTICIPANTS ......................................................... 73 CHAPTER 6 – REFERENCES, ACRONYMS, AND APPENDICES .................................. 75 6.1 REFERENCES CITED .................................................................................................. 75 6.2 LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................. 78 6.3 LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................ 80 Appendices: Appendix A – Parcel List, Stipulations, and Notices Appendix B – Maps Appendix C – Parcels Recommended For Removal Appendix D – Interdisciplinary Team Checklists Appendix E – Responses to Public Comments Appendix F – Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenario Calculations Appendix G – Maps-Lands with Wilderness Characteristics CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION This Environmental Analysis (EA) addresses only those parcels on the preliminary list located within the Canyon Country District Office (CCDO) exclusive of the Moab Master Leasing Plan (MLP) area. Those parcels on the preliminary list located within the Moab MLP area are addressed in a separate Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA #DOI-BLM-UT-Y010-2017-0285-DNA). The preliminary lease sale parcels are located in Utah’s Grand and San Juan Counties. Exclusive of parcels within the MLP, thirty-two parcels, a total of 46,539.72 acres within the district, have been nominated by industry for consideration. Three parcels consisting of approximately 5,673.08 acres of split-estate with the surface owned by the Navajo Nation and administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) are recommended for removal. As a result, the EA for the CCDO March 2018 competitive oil and gas lease sale considers leasing 40,866.64 acres in twenty-nine parcels. Twenty-one parcels totaling approximately 30,341.83 acres are located in the Monticello Field Office (MtFO) area, and eight parcels totaling approximately 10,524.81 acres are located in the Moab Field Office (MFO) area. See the parcel list in Appendix A and maps in Appendix B. Parcels recommended for removal are contained in Appendix C. 1.2 BACKGROUND It is the policy of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as derived from various laws, including the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (MLA) and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), to make mineral resources available for disposal and to encourage development of mineral resources to meet national, regional, and local needs. Utah is a major source of natural gas for heating and electrical energy production in the lower 48 states. The continued sale and issuance of lease parcels facilitates exploration and production as oil and gas companies seek new areas for production or attempt to develop previously inaccessible or uneconomical reserves. The BLM’s Utah State Office conducts quarterly competitive lease sales to sell available oil and gas lease parcels. A Notice of Competitive Lease Sale (NCLS), which lists lease parcels to be offered at the auction, is published by the Utah State Office at least 90 days before the auction is held. Lease stipulations applicable to each parcel are specified in the NCLS. The decision as to which public lands and minerals are open for leasing and what leasing stipulations may be necessary, based on information available at the time, is made during the land use planning process. Constraints on leasing and any future development of split-estate parcels are determined by the BLM in consultation with the appropriate surface management agency or the private surface owner. In the process of preparing a lease sale, the Utah State Office compiles a list of lands nominated and legally available for leasing, and sends a preliminary parcel list to the appropriate District Office where the parcels are located. Field Office staff then review the legal descriptions of the parcels to determine if they are in areas open to leasing under the relevant Resource Management Plan (RMP) and that appropriate stipulations have been included; verify whether any new 1 information has become available that might change any analysis conducted during the planning process; confirm appropriate consultations have been conducted; and identify any special resource conditions of which potential bidders should be made aware. The nominated parcels are posted online for a 30-day public scoping period. The BLM then prepares an analysis in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), usually in the form of an EA. After the Field Office completes the draft parcel review and NEPA analysis and returns them to the State Office, a list of available lease parcels and associated stipulations and notices is made available to the public through a NCLS. Lease sale notices are posted on the Utah BLM website at: http://go.usa.gov/xXk8ch. On rare occasions, the BLM may defer or withhold additional parcels prior to the day of the lease sale. In such cases, the BLM prepares an erratum to the sale notice. The EA and an unsigned Finding of No Significant Impacts (FONSI) (if appropriate) are made available to the public for a 30-day public comment period by posting the documents on the BLM ePlanning page at: https://go.usa.gov/xNfAT. The BLM also typically issues press releases to publicly announce the public comment period for the EA and unsigned FONSI. Comments received from the public are reviewed and incorporated into the NEPA document, as applicable. The EA, with any revisions determined appropriate following the public comment period, and, if still considered appropriate, an unsigned FONSI are again made available to the public through the concurrent posting of those documents and a NCLS at least 90 days in advance of the scheduled lease sale. The posting of the NCLS, EA and FONSI initiates a 30-day public protest period for the proposed lease sale offering that will end 60 days before the scheduled lease sale. The stipulations and notices applicable to each parcel proposed for lease will be specified in attachments to the NCLS. If any changes are needed to the parcels or stipulations and notices identified
Load more

Recommended publications
  • September 2019 Competitive Oil and Gas Lease Sale Monticello Field Office DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2019-0003-OTHER NEPA -Mtfo-EA
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management July 2019 September 2019 Competitive Oil and Gas Lease Sale Monticello Field Office DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2019-0003-OTHER NEPA -MtFO-EA Monticello Field Office 365 North Main PO Box 7 Monticello, UT 84535 DOI-BLM-UT-0000-2019-0003_Other NEPA-MtFO-EA July 2019 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Purpose & Need .................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Project Location and Legal Description ........................................................................................ 4 1.2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Decision to be Made ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Plan Conformance Review............................................................................................................ 6 1.7 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, Policies or Other Plans ..................................................... 9 1.8 Issues Identified .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Monumental Divide the Tribal Bid for Bears Ears Raises Tough Questions About Homelands by Jonathan Thompson October 31 2016 | $5 | Vol
    OF HUCKLEBERRIES AND GRIZZLIES | WESTERN WATER WARS | SHEAR SATISFACTION High Country ForN people whoews care about the West A Monumental Divide The tribal bid for Bears Ears raises tough questions about homelands By Jonathan Thompson October 31 2016 | $5 | Vol. 48 No. 18 | www.hcn.org 18 48 No. | $5 Vol. 2016 31 October CONTENTS Editor’s note Movements, waning and waxing Ten months ago, when a small group of anti-federal agitators occupied the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in eastern Oregon, HCN produced a package of stories about the seemingly revitalized Sagebrush Rebellion. Armed with guns and cellphones and backed by political forces eager to put federal lands in the hands of state and private interests, these new “insurgents” looked formidable. Yet now, anti-federal activity in the West seems to have calmed down, and a jury in Portland will soon decide whether seven of the Malheur occupiers conspired to prevent federal employees from doing their jobs. The land-transfer fever is also cooling: Utah’s governor has balked at the legal fight pushed by hardliners in his Legislature, and the issue largely has been sidelined during this brutal election season. Instead, a different kind of campaign is gaining A protester (who was unwilling to identify himself) sits outside the federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon, as his horse, Lady Liberty, gets a drink from a fountain during the early days of the trial momentum in the West: a modern amalgamation of of Ammon and Ryan Bundy and five other Malheur occupiers.AP PHOTO/DON RYAN the civil rights and environmental movements of the 1960s, buoyed by a new generation of climate and social justice activists and led by an emboldened The San Juan River, seen from the Mexican Hat formation, creates a ribbon of green between Navajo lands Native American community.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Bears Ears National Monument
    PROPOSAL TO PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA FOR THE CREATION OF BEARS EARS NATIONAL MONUMENT Submitted by THE BEARS EARS INTER-TRIBAL COALITION A partnership of the Hopi, Navajo, Uintah and Ouray Ute, Ute Mountain Ute, and Zuni Governments October 15, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………. ... 1 II. THE BEARS EARS LANDSCAPE…………………………………………………..4 A. Physical Characteristics…………………………………………………………...5 B. The Long Native American Presence…………………………………………. .... 8 C. The Tribes are Forced Off the Land...………………………………………. ..... 10 III. THE INTER-TRIBAL COALITION AND THE PREPARATION OF THIS PROPOSAL………………………………………………………………………….14 IV. MONUMENT BOUNDARIES…………………………………………………...…20 V. COLLABORATIVE MANAGEMENT: THE LEGAL BASIS…………………….21 A. Definition of Collaborative Management for the Bears Ears National Monument....……………………………………………………………………..21 B. Presidential Authority to Proclaim Collaborative Management for Bears Ears…23 C. The Lawful Delegation to the Tribes…………………………………………….26 VI. COLLABORATIVE MANAGEMENT: IMPLEMENTATION…………………...28 A. The Bears Ears Management Commission and the Monument Manager…………………………………………………….……...…………….29 B. Monument Planning and Operations……..……………………………………...30 C. The Fruits of Collaborative Management………………….…..………………...31 D. Federal-Tribal Agreements Supplemental to the Proclamation………………….34 VII. MONUMENT USES………………………………………………………………...34 A. Threats to the Bears Ears Landscape…………………………………………….34 B. Uses to be Resolved by the Proclamation………………………………………..36 C. Uses to be Resolved in the Management
    [Show full text]
  • River Flowing from the Sunrise: an Environmental History of the Lower San Juan
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2000 River Flowing from the Sunrise: An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan James M. Aton Robert S. McPherson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Recommended Citation Aton, James M. and McPherson, Robert S., "River Flowing from the Sunrise: An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan" (2000). All USU Press Publications. 128. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/128 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. River Flowing from the Sunrise An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan A. R. Raplee’s camp on the San Juan in 1893 and 1894. (Charles Goodman photo, Manuscripts Division, Marriott Library, University of Utah) River Flowing from the Sunrise An Environmental History of the Lower San Juan James M. Aton Robert S. McPherson Utah State University Press Logan, Utah Copyright © 2000 Utah State University Press all rights reserved Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322-7800 Manfactured in the United States of America Printed on acid-free paper 654321 000102030405 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Aton, James M., 1949– River flowing from the sunrise : an environmental history of the lower San Juan / James M. Aton, Robert S. McPherson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-87421-404-1 (alk. paper) — ISBN 0-87421-403-3 (pbk.
    [Show full text]
  • Monticello Resource Management Plan (USDI-BLM 2008)
    BLM Bureau of Land Management MONTICELLO FIELD OFFICE Record of Decision AND Approved Resource Management Plan NOVEMBER 2008 BLM Mission To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Bureau of Land Management BLM-UT-PL-09-004-1610 UT-090-2007-40 MONTICELLO FIELD OFFICE RECORD OF DECISION AND APPROVED RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN November 2008 Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Monticello Field Office Monticello, Utah Cooperating Agencies: State of Utah San Juan County Monticello Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan - Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS RECORD OF DECISION 1 A. INTRODUCTION 1 Purpose and Need for the Plan 1 Monticello Planning Area 2 B. OVERVIEW OF THE ALTERNATIVES 3 Alternative A 4 Alternative B 4 Alternative C 6 Alternative D 6 Alternative E 8 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated From Analysis 10 C. RESULTS OF PROTEST PERIOD 13 D. THE DECISION 14 What the Decision/RMP Provides 15 What the Decision/RMP Does Not Provide 17 Implementation Decisions 18 Travel Management 18 Livestock Grazing 19 E. NOTICE OF MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS 20 Minor Modifications 20 Clarifications 21 Errata to the Proposed RMP/Final EIS 23 F. MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING THE APPROVED RMP 23 All Surface Disturbing Activities 24 Air Quality 24 Cultural Resources 24 Fire Management 25 Lands and Realty 25 Livestock Grazing 27 Mineral Resources 27 Recreation 29 Riparian 30 Soil and Water 30 Special Designations - Areas of Critical Environmental Concern 31 Special Designations - Wild and Scenic Rivers 34 Special Designations – Historic Trails 37 Non-WSA Lands with Wilderness Characteristics 37 Travel Management 38 Vegetation 39 Visual Resource Management 39 Wildlife and Fisheries 40 Special Status Species 40 Woodlands 41 i Monticello Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan - Table of Contents G.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Hearing Committee on Natural Resources U.S
    H.R. 5780, TO PROVIDE GREATER CONSERVATION, RECREATION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LOCAL MANAGEMENT OF FEDERAL LANDS IN UTAH, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES, ‘‘UTAH PUBLIC LANDS INITIATIVE ACT’’ LEGISLATIVE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON FEDERAL LANDS OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION Wednesday, September 14, 2016 Serial No. 114–51 Printed for the use of the Committee on Natural Resources ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov or Committee address: http://naturalresources.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 21–547 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 14:41 Dec 21, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 J:\114TH CONGRESS\FEDERAL LANDS\09-14-16\21547.TXT DARLEN COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES ROB BISHOP, UT, Chairman RAU´ L M. GRIJALVA, AZ, Ranking Democratic Member Don Young, AK Grace F. Napolitano, CA Louie Gohmert, TX Madeleine Z. Bordallo, GU Doug Lamborn, CO Jim Costa, CA Robert J. Wittman, VA Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan, CNMI John Fleming, LA Niki Tsongas, MA Tom McClintock, CA Pedro R. Pierluisi, PR Glenn Thompson, PA Jared Huffman, CA Cynthia M. Lummis, WY Raul Ruiz, CA Dan Benishek, MI Alan S. Lowenthal, CA Jeff Duncan, SC Donald S. Beyer, Jr., VA Paul A. Gosar, AZ Norma J. Torres, CA Rau´ l R.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1056-B
    Index to the Geologic Names of North America By DRUID WILSON, GRACE C. KEROHER, and BLANCHE E. HANSEN GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 10S6-B Geologic names arranged by age and by area containing type locality. Includes names in Greenland, the West Indies, the Pacific Island possessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Major stratigraphic and time divisions in use by the U.S. Geological Survey._ iv Introduction______________________________________ 407 Acknowledgments. _--__ _______ _________________________________ 410 Bibliography________________________________________________ 410 Symbols___________________________________ 413 Geologic time and time-stratigraphic (time-rock) units________________ 415 Time terms of nongeographic origin_______________________-______ 415 Cenozoic_________________________________________________ 415 Pleistocene (glacial)______________________________________ 415 Cenozoic (marine)_______________________________________ 418 Eastern North America_______________________________ 418 Western North America__-__-_____----------__-----____ 419 Cenozoic (continental)___________________________________ 421 Mesozoic________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-Y020-2016-0031-EA September 2016 The Recapture Canyon ATV Trails System, San Juan County, Utah Location: San Juan County, Utah Applicant/Address: San Juan County 117 South Main Street P.O. Box 9 Monticello, Utah 84535 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Monticello Field Office 435 North Main Monticello, UT 84535 Phone: 435-587-1522 FAX: 435-587-1518 This Page Intentionally Left Blank The Recapture Canyon ATV Trails System, San Juan County, Utah DOI-BLM-UT-Y020-2016-0031-EA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Purpose & Need ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Need for the Proposed Action .................................................................................... 6 1.4 Purpose of the Proposed Action ................................................................................ 6 1.5 Conformance with BLM Land Use Plan ..................................................................... 7 1.6 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or Other Plans ............................................... 8 1.7 Authorizing Actions ...................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Bears Ears National Monument: a Monument for the Locals an Interdisplianry Evaluation of Tribal Involvement in Public Land Planning
    Bears Ears National Monument: A Monument for the Locals An Interdisplianry Evaluation of Tribal Involvement in Public Land Planning BY CHRISTINE KELLY J.D/M.A., Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, 2019 PLAN B PROJECT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the dual degree of a J.D. and a Master’s in Environmental and Natural Resource Studies University of Wyoming, 2019 Laramie, Wyoming Masters Committee: Assistant Professor Temple Stoellinger, Chair Assistant Professor Nicholas Crane, Member Professor Michael Harkin, Outside Member Abstract Bears Ears National Monument has been at the center of a debate on how federal public lands should be managed since 2016 when President Obama designated the area as a national monument. However, tribes in the Southwest had worked to protect the Bears Ears area for years before the area was designated. Tribes had attempted to participate in the Utah Public Lands Initiative, an initiative to provide a local management proposal for federal lands located in Southeast Utah, but they were excluded from the process. Following the designation, non- indigenous locals vocally protested Bears Ears National Monument. Based on many the non- indigenous locals’ concern over the designation of the Bears Ears Natioanl Monument, President Trump, in December of 2017 split Bears Ears Natioanl Monument in two significantly smaller monuments. As a result, the five tribes who campaigned for the Monument’s creation, along with other litigants, challenged President Trump’s ability to reduce the size of the Monument. This thesis uses the conflict surrounding Bears Ears National Monument as a case study to take make an interdisplianry examination of local stakeholders interests in public land management and show the inclusion of tribes in federal public land management will not mean the exclusion of other stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-Y020-2016-0031-EA September 2016 The Recapture Canyon ATV Trails System, San Juan County, Utah Location: San Juan County, Utah Applicant/Address: San Juan County 117 South Main Street P.O. Box 9 Monticello, Utah 84535 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Monticello Field Office 435 North Main Monticello, UT 84535 Phone: 435-587-1522 FAX: 435-587-1518 This Page Intentionally Left Blank The Recapture Canyon ATV Trails System, San Juan County, Utah DOI-BLM-UT-Y020-2016-0031-EA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Purpose & Need ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Need for the Proposed Action .................................................................................... 6 1.4 Purpose of the Proposed Action ................................................................................ 6 1.5 Conformance with BLM Land Use Plan ..................................................................... 7 1.6 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or Other Plans ............................................... 8 1.7 Authorizing Actions ...................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Runoff
    Contents SCS Engineering Field Handbook. Chapter 2 Introduction .....................................2.1 Factors affecting surface runoff .................. 2-2 General ..................................... 2-2 Rainfall ......................................2-2 Hydrologic soil groups ......................... 2-2 Covertype ................................... 2-3 Treatment ................................... 2-3 Hydrologic conditions ..........................2-3 Topography .................................. 2-3 Runoff ........................................ 2-4 Runoff curve numbers ......................... 2-4 Rainfall ...................................... 2-4 Estimating runoff .............................. 2-4 j--/ Time of concentration .......................... 2-5 General ..................................... 2-5 Estimating time of concentration ................. 2-5 Average watershed slope ....................... 2-5 Flow length .................................. 2-5 Peak discharge ................................ 2-6 General ..................................... 2-6 Ia/P ratio .................................... 2-6 Estimating peak discharge ...................... 2-6 Limitations .................................... 2-7 Example 2-1 ................................... 2-8 Example 2-2 ................................... 2-9 Exhibits Pege 2-1 Unit peak discharge (qu ) for SCS Type I rain- fall distribution .......................... 2-1 1 2-IA Unit peak discharge (q, ) for SCS Type IA rainfall distribution ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Canyon Country Lease Sale Protest
    Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 et seq. and the regulations and policies that implement these laws.2 I. Leasing Is the Point of Irretrievable Commitment of Resources It is critical that BLM undertake legally sufficient comprehensive NEPA analysis before deciding to offer, sell and issue the Protested Parcels as subsequent approvals by BLM will not be able to completely eliminate potential environmental impacts. Unfortunately, BLM has not fully analyzed potential and reasonably foreseeable impacts that could flow from its leasing decision. The sale of leases without no surface occupancy (NSO) stipulations represents an irreversible and irretrievable commitment of resources. BLM cannot make such a commitment without adequate analysis: BLM regulations, the courts and [Interior Board of Land Appeals (Board)] precedent proceed under the notion that the issuance of a lease without an NSO stipulation conveys to the lessee an interest and a right so secure that full NEPA review must be conducted prior to the decision to lease. S. Utah Wilderness Alliance, 159 IBLA 220, 241 (2003); see also Pennaco Energy, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of the Interior, 377 F.3d 1147, 1159 (10th Cir. 2004) (“Agencies are required to satisfy the NEPA ‘before committing themselves irretrievably to a given course of action, so that the action can be shaped to account for environmental values.’” (quoting Sierra Club v. Hodel, 848 F.2d 1068, 1093 (10th Cir. 1988))). Thus, in Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, the IBLA explained that [t]he courts have held that the Department must prepare an [environmental impact statement (“EIS”)] before it may decide to issue such “non-NSO” oil and gas leases.
    [Show full text]