“Vast Impropriety”: Tragedy, Camp Negation, and the Double Entendre in Henry James’S the Sacred Fount and the Golden Bowl
“Vast Impropriety”: Tragedy, Camp Negation, and the Double Entendre in Henry James’s The Sacred Fount and The Golden Bowl LEN GUTKIN I. Jamesian Tragedy, Jamesian Camp The final paragraph of Henry James’s The Golden Bowl has long divided read- ers.1 The question is simple: Is the ending happy? Or not? If you think it is, then you will find the typically Jamesian note of renunciation here reduced to a dark shadow in an otherwise sunny scene — a happily resolved heterosexual comedy. If, on the contrary, you think The Golden Bowl is, as a friend put it to me, “a black book” (Thomas Koenigs, pers. comm.), you will emphasize instead James’s introduction of “pity and dread” — those watchwords of tragedy — into the ultimate sentence. The Prince and Maggie have been discussing the disposal of Charlotte, whom Maggie has declared “splendid.” “ ‘That’s our help, you see,’ she added — to point further her moral.” It kept him before her therefore, taking in — or trying to — what she so wonder- fully gave. He tried, too clearly, to please her — to meet her in her own way; but with the result only that, close to her, her face kept before him, his hands hold- ing her shoulders, his whole act enclosing her, he presently echoed: “ ‘See’? I see nothing but you.” And the truth of it had, with this force, after a moment, so strangely lighted his eyes that, as for pity and dread of them, she buried her own in his breast. (James [1904] 2009, 567) The Harvard Society of Fellows supported me during the research and writing of this essay.
[Show full text]