George Koval

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

George Koval George Koval APPENDIX: GEORGE KOVAL At the March 26, 1933 ICOR national executive plenum held in New York, national secretary Shloime Almazov admitted that some of the Americans who had emigrated to Birobidzhan had returned home, unprepared for pioneer work. But others, remarked Almazov, such as the Koval family, had adjusted and were doing very well.1 The ICOR in June 1935 printed a letter that George Koval had written to relatives in the U.S. Born in Sioux City, IA, in 1913, he had migrated to Birobidzhan with his parents Abraham and Ethel, themselves originally immigrants from Telekhani in Belarus, in tsarist Russia, and two brothers, Isiah (Shiye) and Gabriel. At the time of writing he was studying engineering at the Mendeleev Institute of Chemical Technology in Moscow. Abraham Koval had been secretary of the Sioux City branch of the ICOR.2 Two years later, Arkady Rovner wrote in Nailebn-New Life that the Kovals had been well-to-do and had owned a spacious home in Sioux City. Yet they gave up their “well-established” life so that their three sons would have in Birobidzhan those opportunities that they could no longer expect in the crisis-ridden United States. The Kovals were said to “bless the day” that they decided to emigrate. They were now distinguished citizens and patriots of the “great Soviet Fatherland.” In the summer of 1936 the family was visited by Abraham Koval’s sister and her husband, also ICOR members, who returned to Sioux City “overbrimming with enthusiasm for what they saw in the Soviet Union generally, and in Biro- Bidjan in particular.” The Kovals, Rovner declared, were participating in “the rejuvenation of a nation, the building of a new Jewish nation in the Jewish Autonomous Territory.”3 Also in the summer of 1936, while on a visit to Birobidzhan, Paul Novick met Shiye Koval, who was now one of the best tractor drivers on the Icor commune. Shiye’s two brothers were studying chemistry in Moscow, their mother told Novick, and she had much nakhes [satisfaction] from them. Novick thought to himself that the Kovals had exchanged the uncertainty of life as small storekeepers in Sioux City for a worry- free existence for themselves and their children.4 George Koval, who died in Moscow on January 31, 2006, went on to have a most unusual career. In November 2007, Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin posthumously honored him with the “Gold Star and Hero of Russia” medal. It was revealed that Koval, under the code name “Delmar,” was a GRU (Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Soviet Armed Forces) “mole” working on the Manhattan Project during World War II. Speaking at the award ceremony, 253 A PPENDIX II Putin stressed that Koval’s work had strengthened Russia’s defense capabilities considerably and had drastically reduced the amount of time it took for Russia to develop its nuclear weapons. Upon graduating with honors from the Mendeleev Institute, Koval had been recruited and trained by Soviet military intelligence, and was sent back to the United States for nearly a decade of scientifi c espionage, from roughly 1940 to 1948. He initially gathered information about new toxins that might fi nd use in chemical arms. After America entered World War II in December 1941, Koval was drafted into the U.S. Army, and by chance found himself moving toward the bomb project, then in its infancy. The Army in 1943 sent him for special wartime training at City College in Manhattan. There, Koval and a dozen or so of his Army peers studied electrical engineering. Meanwhile, the Manhattan Project asked the Army for technically adept recruits, and in 1944, Koval headed to Oak Ridge, TN, where the main job was to make bomb fuel, considered the hardest part of the atomic endeavor. Koval gained wide access to the complex, and in June 1945, his duties expanded to include top-secret plants near Dayton. In 1948, Koval fl ed the United States when American counterintelligence agents found Soviet literature hailing the Koval family as happy immigrants from the United States. A year later, Moscow detonated its fi rst bomb, surprising Washington at the quick loss of what had been an atomic monopoly.5 ENDNOTES 1 “Barikht fun general-sekretar tsu dem icor plenum, gehaltn in new york, 26tn marts, 1933,” ICOR 6, 4 (April 1933): 13; “In der icor baveygung,” ICOR 6, 5 (May 1933): 18. 2 “Letters from the Soviet Union Tell of New Happy Life,” Nailebn-New Life 9, 2 (June 1935): 45. There is a picture of the Koval family taken before they left for Birobidzhan in the ICOR 5, 7 (July 1932): 14. In November 1928Abraham Koval had arranged a great reception in Sioux City for Reuben Brainin, who was on a speaking tour, and $600 was collected for the ICOR. “In der ‘icor’ baveygung,” ICOR 1, 4 (December 1928): 14. 3 A. Rovner, “Pen Portraits of American Jews in Biro-Bidjan,” Nailebn-New Life 11, 4 (April 1937): 14-15 [English section]. 4 Paul Novick, Yidn in biro-bidzhan, 73, 81-84. 5 William J. Broad, “A Spy’s Path: Iowa to A-Bomb to Kremlin Honor,” New York Times, November 12, 2007, A1, A19; Michael Walsh, “Iowa-Born, Soviet- Trained,” Smithsonian 40, 2 (May 2009): 40-47. 254.
Recommended publications
  • AUS' Margaret B., 101, of St. Clairsville, for Merly of Bridgeport, Died Thursday April 11, 2013, at Park Health Center S
    -w tn?AUS’ Margaret B., 101, of St. Clairsville, for­ merly of Bridgeport, died Thursday April 11, 2013, at Park Health Center St. Clairsville. She was born February 4, 1912, in Austria Hungry, a daughter of the late Michael and Anna (Bartok) Vargo. She was a member of the Tri-State Assembly of God in St. Clairsville. In addition to her par­ ents, she was preceded in death by a great- grand­ daughter, Terra Grace Hicks; and a sister, Irene B. Vapner. / Margaret is survived by her sons, Rudolph S. “Buck” (Debbie) Saus of Colerain, and James M. (Donna) Saus of Wheeling; a brother, Michael (Peri) Vargo of Columbus; and sister, Mary Pruszynski of Pittsburgh; five grandchil­ dren, Brian (Jackie) Hicks, Garrett (Trisha) Hicks, Rayven (Andrew) Cobb, Jimmy (Sara) Saus and Christie (Mike) Drake, six great- grandchildren; Maura, Ryleigh, Quentin, Zach, Geno, and Taylor; a brother-in-law, Tom Vapner; also several nieces and nephews. Friends are invited to a graveside service at Lin wood Cemetery, Blaine on Saturday April 13, 2013 at 1 p.m. with Rev. James Hoff officiating. Wilson Funeral Home, 920 National Road, Brookside is assisting the family. In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions can be made to Park Health Center, 100 Pine Dr., St. Clairsville, OH. 43950. Spring Road, Martins Ferry, died Wednesday in East Ohio Regional Hospital, Martins Ferry. He was a retired employee of Wheeling-Pitts- burgh Steel Corp., Yorkville plant, and a member of Scotch Ridge Presbyterian Church. Surviving are his wife, Elizabeth Hughes Saus; five sons, Rudolph Saus of Martins Ferry, James Saus of Wheeling, Ernest Hughes of Yorkille, Robert Hughes of Michigan, and Charles Edward Hughes, with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Project Spies and Oak Ridge, Part 1 (As Published in the Oak Ridger’S Historically Speaking Column on December 1, 2014)
    Manhattan Project Spies and Oak Ridge, part 1 (As published in The Oak Ridger’s Historically Speaking column on December 1, 2014) This is the first in a series of four Historically Speaking columns on Manhattan Project spies with connections to Oak Ridge. For many years, I was not sure that any spies were actually in Oak Ridge. Bill Wilcox and I discussed this at length and he too was doubtful at that time. Even though some names were mentioned, evidence seemed lacking. However, of late, so much additional information has been declassified and made available to the public regarding those activities of some 65 – 70 years ago. Much more is now known regarding the detailed activities of those who passed sensitive classified information to the Russians during the Manhattan Project. We will look first at George Koval, next at Klaus Fuchs and finally at Al Slack. Recently there seems to be more and more information coming available about spies during the Manhattan Project. The Spy Who Stole The Urchin: George Koval’s Infiltration of the Manhattan Project by Owen N. Pagano, an Atomic Heritage Foundation intern, posted on the Atomic Heritage Foundation’s web site: http://www.atomicheritage.org/ is the most recent information I have seen about George Koval. Koval is the ONLY official Soviet spy known to have infiltrated the Manhattan Project and the early Cold War era developments. His deep penetration only came to light in the recent past after over 50 years of obscurity. Some of the most notable spies were: George Koval; Theodore “Ted” Hall who was never caught; David Greenglass; Ethel and Julius Rosenberg; Harry Gold; and Klaus Fuchs.
    [Show full text]
  • NCRP D Th Milli W K St D NCRP and the Million Worker Study
    Department of Energy Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee 6 December 2012 – Washington, D.C. NCRP and th e Milli on Wor ker Stu dy John D Boice Jr National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (()NCRP) Vanderbilt University, Dept of Medicine [email protected] http://NCRPonline.org Outline NCRP Million U.S. Radiation Worker and Veteran Study . DOE Manhattan Project Workers . NRC Nuclear Utility Workers . DOD Atomic Veteran . Medical Workers Opportunities National Council on Radiation Ptti&MProtection & Measuremen ts 1929: U.S. Advisory Committee on X-ray and Radium Protection 1946: USU.S. Na tiona lCl Comm ittee on Radiation Protection 1964: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements chartered by Congress (Public Law 88-376 ) Reports, Advice, Research 2012 National Study of One Million U.S. Radiation Workers and Veterans . Manhattan Project . Atomic veterans . Nuclear utility workers . Medical and other Robert Oppenheimer, General Leslie Groves, Enrico Fermi, Hans Bethe, Theodore Hall . Other military – possibly Navy OAK (HARDTACK I), Enewetak, Health Physics News October 2012 8.9 MT, 28 Jun 1958 Sponsored by: The Major Issue in Radiation Epidemiology and Radiation Protection? What is the level of risk when exposure received gradually over time and not briefly ? Medicine Accidents Occupation Environment Summary of Progress . The Pilot study demonstrated that the full-scale study is feasible. The study population is 10x larger than the atomic bomb survivor study and has more high-dose subjects (>100 mSv) and many more deaths (286,000 to date). The assembled cohort consists of 196,000 DOE uranium workers, 155,000 DOE plutonium workers, 300,000 nuclear power plant workers, over 300,000 other radiation workers, and 115 , 000 atomic veterans.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Project Spies and Oak Ridge, Part 4 (As Published in the Oak Ridger’S Historically Speaking Column on December 29, 2014)
    Manhattan Project Spies and Oak Ridge, Part 4 (As published in The Oak Ridger’s Historically Speaking column on December 29, 2014) Continuing with the fourth and final installment of the Historically Speaking series on Manhattan Project Spies with connections to Oak Ridge, we now examine Al Slack, according to Dr. John Googin’s autobiography, Al Slack was a shift supervisor at Y-12 during the Manhattan Project. Alfred Dean Slack was born in 1906. He worked at the Eastman Kodak Company in Rochester, NY, where he first sold commercial information first to Richard Briggs, thinking it was going to a competitor of Kodak, but learned it was actually going to the Soviet Union. Later after Briggs sudden death, Slack was handed off by Soviet agents to Harry Gold who became the courier to provide the information to the Soviet Union. Harry Gold (December 11, 1911 - August 28, 1972) was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to Russian Jewish immigrants. By 1940, Gold was a recruited Soviet agent assigned the codename GUS, or GOOSE. As often happens with Historically Speaking, these articles on spies in Oak Ridge have produced several contacts with people who have additional information. I received a contact from Mike Finn concerning Al Slack. Mike said, “I have a personal connection. My family has had a farm in Webster, NY (just outside Rochester) for over a century. From time to time I heard stories about the spy who lived next door in the late 1930’s, early 40’s, and who moved to Oak Ridge. They mentioned the name of Harry Gold.” Mike continued, “I was a bit skeptical and wanted to know more.
    [Show full text]
  • Postsecondary Student Terminology
    Postsecondary Student 'Termninolog/U S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tra~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ iillz% k -1 . 11 i go Is PostsecondaryStudent Terminology A Handbook of Terms and Definitions for Describing Students in Postsecondary Education by John F. Putnam National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education T. H. Bell Secretary Office of Educational Research and Improvement Dick W. Hays.o Acting Assistant Secretary National Center for Education Statistics Marie D. Eldridge Administrator NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS "The purpose of the Center shall be to collect and disseminate statistics and other data related to education in the United States and in other nations. The Center shall . .. collect, collate, and, from time to time, report full and complete statistics on the, conditions of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports on specialized analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; . .. and review and. report on education activities in foreign countries."--Section 406(b) of the General Education Provisions Act, as amended (20 U.S.C. 122 le-1). "The Secretary shall, insofar as practicable, develop standard definitions and terms . .. to be used by all Federal agencies in dealing with education-related information and data acquisition recjuests."--Section 400 A. (d)(1) of the General Education Provisions Act, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1221e-1). Drafts of this manuscript were developed by Government Studies and Systems, Inc. under contract No. OEC-0-74-9264 with the National Center for Education Statistics. Jerome Ackerman served as Project Director. FOREWORD This handbook is a resource publication designed to encourage standardization in the use of terms and defini- lions by the numerous agencies, institutions, and organizations which provide, set policy for, support, and/or regu- late postsecondary education.
    [Show full text]
  • Spying in America Espionage from the Revolutionary War to the Dawn of the Cold War Michael J
    ENJOY A SPECIAL 30% DISCOUNT Spying in America Espionage from the Revolutionary War to the Dawn of the Cold War Michael J. Sulick “Spying In America reveals how important espionage has been to the American chronicle. Historian Michael Sulick tells the story from a unique perspective―a career clandestine services officer who knows what is important. As motivating as Lawrence of Arabia; as insightful as le Carré; as reliable as David McCullough . indispensable reading for a basic foundation.” —Hayden B. Peake, former army and CIA intelligence officer Can you keep a secret? Maybe you can, but the United States government cannot. Since the birth of our country, nations large and small, from Russia and China to Ghana and Ecuador, have stolen the most precious secrets of the United States. From the American Revolution, through the Civil War and two World Wars, to the atomic age of the Manhattan Project, Sulick details the lives of those who have betrayed America’s secrets. Spying in America serves as the perfect introduction to the early November 2012 history of espionage in America. Sulick’s unique experience as a senior intelligence officer is evident as he skillfully guides the reader through hardcover, ISBN 978-1-58901-926-3 these cases of intrigue, deftly illustrating the evolution of American $26.95, $18.87 US awareness about espionage and the fitful development of American £18.75, £13.13 UK counterespionage leading up to the Cold War. Michael J. Sulick is a retired intelligence operations officer who worked for the CIA for twenty-eight years. He served as chief of CIA counterintelligence from 2002 to 2004 and as director of the National Clandestine Service from 2007 to 2010, where he was responsible for supervising the agency’s covert collection operations and coordinating the espionage activities of the US intelligence community.
    [Show full text]
  • Espionage Against America from AFIO's the INTELLIGENCER
    Association of Former Intelligence Officers From AFIO's The Intelligencer 7700 Leesburg Pike, Suite 324 Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies Falls Church, Virginia 22043 Web: www.afio.com, E-mail: [email protected] Volume 23 • Number 1 • $15 single copy price Summer 2017 ©2017, AFIO Foreign intelligence collectors seek US classified information and technology, especially those with military applications. However, today anything of GUIDE TO THE STUDY OF INTELLigENCE value is a highly prized target for economic espionage, including proprietary information, trade secrets, and R&D data. Prime private sector targets are indus- tries in the information technology, manufacturing, Espionage Against America financial, and pharmaceutical fields. But consumer companies, biological, and medical institutions, and the service sector are increasingly targeted. by David Major and Peter C. Oleson Russia, Cuba, and the People’s Republic of China (PRC), are – and have been – the most aggressive in At the beginning of the 20th century, the United targeting US national security information. Since the States transcended from being an isolated nation Economic Espionage Law of 1996 was passed, 85% of separated by vast oceans and disengaged in world all the economic espionage cases resulting in crimi- events, to becoming a prime espionage target for nal charges have involved spies from Asian countries military, political, intelligence, and economic including the PRC, Taiwan, South Korea, and India, information. with the PRC being the most active. The number one country behind the illegal export of restricted tech- America: The Target nology is Iran, with the PRC the next largest diverter of technology.4 merica’s pivotal role in World War I altered its position in the international arena.
    [Show full text]
  • 70Th Anniversary of the Manhattan Project
    70th Anniversary of the Manhattan Project June 2 and 3, 2015 Washington, DC To commemorate the 70th anniversary of the Manhattan Project, honor Manhattan Project veterans, and provide a preview of the new Manhattan Project National Historical Park, the Atomic Heritage Foundation is hosting events on Tuesday, June 2 and Wednesday, June 3, 2015. Both events will be open to the public and the press and will be held at the Carnegie Institution for Science, 1530 P Street, Northwest, Washington, DC, a few blocks from DuPont Circle. A reunion for Manhattan Project veterans and their families will be held on Tuesday, June 2 beginning at 2:30 PM. The program will be a chance for Manhattan Project veterans to share their memories, followed by a reception. On Wednesday, June 3, 2015, a symposium will feature a discussion of the new park by officials from the Departments of Energy and Interior and sessions with veterans and experts talking about the Manhattan Project and its legacy for today. The following is a preliminary agenda for the events. Tuesday, June 2, 2015 Manhattan Project: A Great Collaborative Effort 2:30 PM Remembering the Manhattan Project Moderated by Cindy Kelly, Manhattan Project veterans and their children will have a chance to share some highlights of their experiences. 5:30 PM Reception 7:00 PM Adjourn Wednesday, June 3, 2015 70th Anniversary of the Manhattan Project 8:00 AM Registration, Coffee and Continental Breakfast 9:00 AM to 9:45 AM Introductory Remarks (TBD) Senator Martin Heinrich and Lt. General Thomas Bostick, U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General (invited) 9:45 AM to 10:30 AM Preview of the Manhattan Project Park Patrick Gregerson, Chief of Planning for the National Park Service, and Jaime Shimek, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Senate Affairs for the Department of Energy, will talk about the creation of the new Manhattan Project National Historical Park at Los Alamos, NM, Oak Ridge, TN and Hanford, WA.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE South Region Counterintelligence Suspicious Contact Reporting 1 May 2019 Special Agent Jeff Elliott
    UNCLASSIFIED DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE South Region Counterintelligence Suspicious Contact Reporting 1 May 2019 Special Agent Jeff Elliott UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED “Among the potential pool of spies are those who are disgruntled or disenchanted, those who will seek revenge against a real or perceived grievance, those who are driven by money, & those who are egotistical & subject to flattery.” UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Agenda 1) DSS Counterintelligence (CI) 2) What to Protect - Awareness 3) Foreign Intelligence Threats • Methods of Contact & Operations (MCMO) 4) Potential CI Indicators • Vignettes 5) Suspicious Contact Reporting Counterintelligence – Knowledge and Action UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED DSS Mission and Scope DSS Mission DSS supports national security and the warfighter, secures the nation’s technological base, and oversees the protection of U.S. and classified information in the hands of industry. Counterintelligence Mission DSS CI collects actionable threat information across cleared industry, analyses and articulates the threat for industry and U.S. Government leaders. Deter - Detect – Disrupt {Collection Activities} Scope - 12,000+ facilities; 1.2m people - 2 CI professional / 261 facilities (South Region, Field Office) - 12% of facilities report suspicious contacts UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED What Should We Protect? Any information that would degrade the nation’s advantage if compromised Protect anything that may: • Damage national security • Alter program Quality, Cost, or Schedule • Compromise the program or system capabilities
    [Show full text]
  • The Superiority of Information and the Power of the Nation State
    International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXIV No 1 2018 THE SUPERIORITY OF INFORMATION AND THE POWER OF THE NATION STATE Laviniu BOJOR “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania [email protected] Abstract: Access to valuable information has been, is and will continue to be the focus of all the nation states. The benefits of access to information cannot be questioned, but the volatile nature of this Power Information has shown over time that a state's inability to keep its secrets leads to the loss of this power. The present paper captures historical milestones of information gathering activity that have greatly changed the balance of power between the state actors involved. Keywords: espionage, motives, ideology, money, revenge, whistleblower, Rosenberg, Philby, Walker, Penkovsky, Ames, Snowden 1. Introduction Case studies are focused on historical The fight for the state supremacy is based milestones of intelligence that have greatly on the access to information of all kind and changed the balance of power between state fields. The access to information, by using actors involved in this silent fight for all means considered available, has information. characterized the geopolitical scene of the second half of the past century. The 2. Ideology and nuclear secret dichotomy communism – capitalism was The damage caused by nuclear capabilities carried out in state and non state, direct from Hiroshima and Nagasaki has conflicts or proxy war, overt and covert generated major changes not only on the operations, where were invested massive geopolitical scene, but also in society, human and technological resources with the leading to a real nuclear culture marked by accurate aim of getting classified data and symbols like: “events (such as the Cuban information.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Trail of a Fourth Soviet Spy at Los Alamos
    Project SOLO and the Seborers On the Trail of a Fourth Soviet Spy at Los Alamos Harvey Klehr and John Earl Haynesa ? Images © Science History Images/Alamy Stock (left two) and Everett Collection/Alamy Stock Until 1995 only two Soviet spies, Klaus Fuchs and Da- with Fuchs, Greenglass, and Hall the fourth Soviet source vid Greenglass (shown being arrested above), were pub- at the Los Alamos laboratory in WWII was Oscar Seborer. licly known to have stolen US atomic secrets from Los Alamos, the super-secret Manhattan Project facility where The FBI has known since 1955 that Oscar, his brother the atomic bomb was actually built. Coded Soviet cables Stuart, Stuart’s wife Miriam, and Miriam’s mother all se- sent during the years 1940–48 that were eventually deci- cretly defected to the Soviet bloc in 1952, living initially phered by US intelligence, under the codename Venona, in East Germany but then moving to Moscow, where they and released in 1995 identified a third Soviet agent, Theo- lived under the name Smith. The brothers never returned dore Hall, a young physics prodigy who had worked as a from Moscow, but remarkably Miriam, by then divorced junior scientist in the plutonium bomb project. from Stuart, returned to the United States with her son (born in East Germany) and her mother in 1969, at the Some students of Soviet atomic espionage have be- height of the Cold War. But the role of Oscar Seborer and lieved in the existence of a fourth unidentified Soviet spy his associates in Soviet espionage has remained hidden at Los Alamos, codenamed “Perseus,” later changed to for 70 years.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SPY WHO STOLE the URCHIN: George Koval’S Infiltration of the Manhattan Project
    THE SPY WHO STOLE THE URCHIN: George Koval’s Infiltration of the Manhattan Project Owen N. Pagano The George Washington University B.A., summa cum laude, History Class of 2014 Pagano 2 More than six decades after the United States developed and used the first atomic bomb against Japan, information surrounding the top-secret Manhattan Project continues to emerge. On November 2, 2007, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin posthumously awarded Soviet citizen George A. Koval with the Hero of the Russian Medal, the nation’s highest civilian honor, for “his courage and heroism while carrying out special missions” and acknowledged Koval’s contribution to the Soviet Union’s development of the atomic bomb. In the Kremlin’s press release on this curious event, Putin noted that Koval, who operated under the codename Delmar, “provided information that helped speed up considerably the time it took for the Soviet Union to develop an atomic bomb of its own, thus ensuring the preservation of strategic military parity with the United States.” According to the press release, Koval was the “only Soviet intelligence officer to penetrate the U.S. secret atomic facilities producing the plutonium, enriched uranium and polonium used to create the atomic bomb.”1 News of Koval’s infiltration of the Manhattan Project shocked the American intelligence community and has prompted a complete reassessment of Soviet espionage during the Second World War. Over the years, government officials and scholars have identified nearly a dozen individuals who spied on the American bomb project for the Soviet Union, especially at Los Alamos in New Mexico.
    [Show full text]