DOCSLIB.ORG

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT of NIGERIA Public Disclosure Authorized

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT of NIGERIA Public Disclosure Authorized FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF NIGERIA Public Disclosure Authorized FEDERAL ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (FRDP) NIGERIA IN COLLABRATION WITH FEDERAL ROADS MAINTENANCE AGENCY Public Disclosure Authorized (FERMA) FINAL REPORT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Public Disclosure Authorized PLAN (EMP) FOR THE PERIODIC MAINTENANCE OF DINGAYA – GALAMBI– RUNGO ROAD Public Disclosure Authorized DECEMBER, 2010 EMP of Dingaya – Galambi –Rungo Road TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT........................................................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................10 CHAPTER ONE ....................................................................................................................................................16 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................16 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 16 1.2 NIGERIA ............................................................................................................................................ 17 1.3 THE APPLICANT .............................................................................................................................. 18 1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) ................................... 19 1.5 EMP TERMS OF REFERENCE ........................................................................................................ 19 1.5.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE CONSULTATION: ......................................................................................... 19 1.5.2 SCOPE OF WORK: ........................................................................................................................... 19 1.6 REVIEW OFESMF FOR THE FRDP ................................................................................................ 20 1.7 STRUCTURE OF THE EMP REPORT .............................................................................................. 21 1.8 POLICY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................... 22 1.8.1 THE 1999 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA ................................... 22 1.8.2 THE NATIONAL POLICY ON ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................... 22 1.8.3 ECONOMIC POLICY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................... 23 1.8.4 NATIONAL TRANSPORT POLICY ................................................................................................... 23 1.9 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................................................... 24 1.9.1 NATIONAL LEGISLATIONS ............................................................................................................. 24 1.9.2 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES ................................................................................ 24 1.9.3 NIGERIAN EMP PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................ 26 1.9.4 OTHER NATIONAL LEGISLATIONS .............................................................................................. 27 1.9.5 STATE LEGISLATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 28 1.10 WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICIES ......................................................................................... 33 1.11 INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS, TREATIES AND CONVENTIONS .............................................. 34 CHAPTER TWO ...................................................................................................................................................36 PROJECT JUSTIFICATION ............................................................................................................................... 36 2.1 NEED FOR THE PROJECT ............................................................................................................. 36 2.1.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 36 2.1.2 BENEFIT OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................................................... 36 2.2 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................. 36 2.2.1 USING OTHER TRAVEL MODES .................................................................................................... 37 2.2.2 ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS ......................................................................................................... 37 2.2.3 DESIGN VARIATIONS OF ALIGNMENT AND GRADE .................................................................. 37 2.2.4 NO-PROJECT .................................................................................................................................... 37 2.2.5 PREFFERED ALTERNATIVE: REHABILITATING THE EXISTING ROADS ................................. 38 2.3 .1 ENVISAGED SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................................................... 38 CHAPTER THREE ..............................................................................................................................................40 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................40 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................ 40 3.1. PROJECT LOCATION ...................................................................................................................... 40 3.2 DESIGN STANDARDS ...................................................................................................................... 42 3.3 LAYOUT AND EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE ROAD ............................................................... 42 3.3.1 CARRIAGEWAY AND SHOULDERS ................................................................................................ 43 3.3.2 PAVEMENT ....................................................................................................................................... 43 3.3.3 EXISTING ALIGNMENT ................................................................................................................... 43 3.3.4 DRAINAGE ........................................................................................................................................ 43 3.3.5 ROAD FURNITURE .......................................................................................................................... 44 3.4 SCOPE OF WORKS / PROJECT OVERVIEW .................................................................................. 44 3.5 INPUT AND OUTPUT OF RAW MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS ................................................... 44 3.5.1 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS ........................................................................................................ 44 3.5.2 RAW MATERIAL SUPPLY ................................................................................................................ 45 FERMA 1 EMP of Dingaya – Galambi –Rungo Road 3.6 STAFFING AND SUPPORT .............................................................................................................. 45 3.6.1 FACILITIES AND SERVICES ........................................................................................................... 45 3.6.2 BASE CAMP ...................................................................................................................................... 45 3.7 PROJECT SCHEDULE ..................................................................................................................... 45 CHAPTER FOUR .................................................................................................................................................46 BASELINE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................46 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................... 46 4.1 BASELINE DATA ACQUISITION METHODS.................................................................................. 46 4.1.1 SAMPLING DESIGN AND FIELD 'MEASUREMENTS .................................................................... 46 4.1.2 GOAL OF SAMPLING ...................................................................................................................... 47 4.1.3 SAMPLE CONTAINERS ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JG 403 In-Depth Capacity Assessment of Csos in Jigawa State
    Education Sector Support Programme in Nigeria (ESSPIN) Assignment Report In‐Depth Capacity Assessment of Civil Society Organisations in Jigawa State Report Number JG 403 Sarah Mkeryi Amahson and Iliya Ambi November 2009 www.esspin.org In‐Depth Capacity Assessment of Civil Society Organisations in Jigawa State Report Distribution and Revision Sheet Project Name: Education Sector Support Programme in Nigeria Code: 244333TA02 Report No.: JG 403 Report Title: In‐Depth Capacity Assessment of Civil Society Organisations in Jigawa State Rev No Date of issue Originator Checker Approver Scope of checking 1 April Sarah Amahson Fatima Steve Formatting/ 2010 and Aboki Baines Checking Iliya Ambi Scope of Checking This report has been discussed with the originator and checked in the light of the requirements of the terms of reference. In addition the report has been checked to ensure editorial consistencies. Distribution List Name Position DFID Kathleen Reid Human Development Programme Coordinator, DFID Ian Attfield Education Adviser, DFID Northern Nigeria Office Roseline Onyemachi Education Project Officer, DFID ESSPIN Ron Tuck National Programme Manager Kayode Sanni Deputy Programme Manager Richard Hanson Assistant Programme Manager Steve Baines Technical Team Coordinator Gboyega Ilusanya State Team Leader Lagos Emma Williams State Team Leader Kwara Richard Dalgarno State Team Leader Kano Steve Bradley State Team Leader Kaduna Pius Elumeze State Team Leader Enugu Kalli Kori Deputy State Team Leader Jigawa John Kay Lead Specialist, Education Quality
    [Show full text]
  • Granite Formations and Granite Cavities in Northern Nigeria
    8012096-XEOLOXIA N 33.qxd:maquet. 1 7/1/09 19:47 Página 10 Cadernos Lab. Xeolóxico de Laxe Coruña. 2009. Vol. 34, pp. 13 - 26 ISSN: 0213-4497 As citas bibliográficas dentro do texto poránse en maxúscula e a abreviatura para os seguin- tes autores será: "et al.". Os textos enviados serán sometidos á crítica dos Censores Científicos designados pola Revista. Bibliografía: Autores en maxúsculas e as revistas ou textos citados en cursiva. Granite formations and granite cavities in Os autores dos traballos deberán incluir a súa dirección completa, incluído código postal. northern Nigeria Formaciones graníticas y cavidades Separatas graníticas en el Norte de Nigeria Enviaráse a cada autor un PDF co artículo na versión final. Envío de manuscritos SZENTES, G1. - Os traballos originais enviaránse a: (1) Alte Frankfurter Str. 22b, 61118 Bad Vilbel, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Instituto Universitario de Xeoloxía Recibido: 9/8/2007 Revisado: 10/3/2008 Aceptado: 15/6/2008 Edificio Servicios Centrales de Investigación Campus de Elviña s/n Telephone: (+34) 981 167000 Ext. 2910 Fax: (+34) 981 167172 [email protected] 15071 A Coruña (Spain) incluindo dirección habitual e teléfono. Abstract — Unha vez terminada a impresión, os originais serán devoltos ao seu autor/es, si así o des- exan e expresan. The Author worked as geologist in Northern Nigeria during several years. This study presents — O número máximo de follas que se admitirá por traballo será quince (15) incluindo figu- his experiences concerning the granite formations of the region. The geological base of Northern ras, fotografías, mapas, etc.. Para traballos de maior extensión rógase consultar ao editor Nigeria is the so-called Basement Complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report for Out-Of-School Children in Jigawa
    SURVEY REPORT FOR OUT-OF-SCHOOL CHILDREN IN JIGAWA STATE, NIGERIA CO-ORDINATED BY JIGAWA STATE GOVERNMENT IN COLLABORATION WITH ESSPIN August, 2014 Page | 1 Table of Contents Cover page i Acknowledgements iii Preface iv List of Tables v List of Figures vi Acronyms vii Executive Summary viii Section One: Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives 2 1.3 Framework for Out-of-School Children 2 1.4 Profile of Jigawa State 4 Section Two: Methodology 6 2.1 Survey Planning for Out-of-School Children 6 2.2 Sampling Design 7 2.3 Data Quality and Supervision 7 2.4 Pilot Survey 8 2.5 Process of Data Collection and Analysis 9 Section Three: Results for Out-of-School Children 10 3.1 Number of Households and Population Size 10 3.2 Number of Out-of-School Children 12 3.3 Number of Children Attending Schools 20 3.4 Percentages of Out-of-School Children 24 Section Four: Possible Risk Factors for Out-of-School Children 27 4.1 Reasons for Out-of-School Children 27 4.2 Socio-Economic Relationships with Out-of-School Status 28 Section Five: Conclusion and Recommendations 42 5.1 Conclusion 42 5.2 Suggestions and the way forward 45 5.3 Limitations 46 References 47 Appendix A: Questionnaire 48 Page | 2 Appendix B: Interview Guide 52 Appendix C: Number of Children in the Sampled Household 53 Appendix D: Percentages of Children that Dropout from School 54 Appendix E: Percentages of Children that Never Attended School 55 Appendix F: Percentages of Children Attending Only Islamiyya/Quranic 56 Schools Appendix G: Percentages of Children Attending any Form of School 57 Appendix H: Population Projection (3-18) by Age, Sex and LGA, 2014 58 Appendix I: Sampling Variability and Ranges for OOS Children 59 Page | 3 Acknowledgements Education planning is incomplete without credible statistics on out-of-school children.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Violence-Related Deaths in Nafada Local Government Area Of
    # Makai DANIEL http://www.ifra-nigeria.org/IMG/pdf/violence-related-deaths-gombe-jigawa-state-nigeria.pdf A Study of Violence-Related Deaths in Nafada Local Government Area of Gombe State and Auyo, Gagarawa, Gumel, Gwiwa, Kaugama and Yankwasi Local Government Areas of Jigawa State (2006-2014) IFRA-Nigeria working papers series, n°46 20/01/2015 The ‘Invisible Violence’ Project Based in the premises of the French Institute for Research in Africa on the campus of the University of Ibadan, Nigeria Watch is a database project that has monitored fatal incidents and human security in Nigeria since 1 June 2006. The database compiles violent deaths on a daily basis, including fatalities resulting from accidents. It relies on a thorough reading of the Nigerian press (15 dailies & weeklies) and reports from human rights organisations. The two main objectives are to identify dangerous areas and assess the evolution of violence in the country. However, violence is not always reported by the media, especially in remote rural areas that are difficult to access. Hence, in the last 8 years, Nigeria Watch has not recorded any report of fatal incidents in some of the 774 Local Government Areas (LGAs) of the Nigerian Federation. There are two possibilities: either these places were very peaceful, or they were not covered by the media. This series of surveys thus investigates ‘invisible’ violence. By 1 November 2014, there were still 23 LGAs with no report of fatal incidents in the Nigeria Watch database: Udung Uko and Urue-Offong/Oruko (Akwa Ibom), Kwaya Kusar (Borno), Nafada (Gombe), Auyo, Gagarawa, Kaugama and Yankwashi (Jigawa), Ingawa and Matazu (Katsina), Sakaba (Kebbi), Bassa, Igalamela- Odolu and Mopa-Muro (Kogi), Toto (Nassarawa), Ifedayo (Osun), Gudu and Gwadabaw (Sokoto), Ussa (Taraba), and Karasuwa, Machina, Nguru and Yunusari (Yobe).
    [Show full text]
  • States and Lcdas Codes.Cdr
    PFA CODES 28 UKANEFUN KPK AK 6 CHIBOK CBK BO 8 ETSAKO-EAST AGD ED 20 ONUIMO KWE IM 32 RIMIN-GADO RMG KN KWARA 9 IJEBU-NORTH JGB OG 30 OYO-EAST YYY OY YOBE 1 Stanbic IBTC Pension Managers Limited 0021 29 URU OFFONG ORUKO UFG AK 7 DAMBOA DAM BO 9 ETSAKO-WEST AUC ED 21 ORLU RLU IM 33 ROGO RGG KN S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 10 IJEBU-NORTH-EAST JNE OG 31 SAKI-EAST GMD OY S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 2 Premium Pension Limited 0022 30 URUAN DUU AK 8 DIKWA DKW BO 10 IGUEBEN GUE ED 22 ORSU AWT IM 34 SHANONO SNN KN CODE CODE 11 IJEBU-ODE JBD OG 32 SAKI-WEST SHK OY CODE CODE 3 Leadway Pensure PFA Limited 0023 31 UYO UYY AK 9 GUBIO GUB BO 11 IKPOBA-OKHA DGE ED 23 ORU-EAST MMA IM 35 SUMAILA SML KN 1 ASA AFN KW 12 IKENNE KNN OG 33 SURULERE RSD OY 1 BADE GSH YB 4 Sigma Pensions Limited 0024 10 GUZAMALA GZM BO 12 OREDO BEN ED 24 ORU-WEST NGB IM 36 TAKAI TAK KN 2 BARUTEN KSB KW 13 IMEKO-AFON MEK OG 2 BOSARI DPH YB 5 Pensions Alliance Limited 0025 ANAMBRA 11 GWOZA GZA BO 13 ORHIONMWON ABD ED 25 OWERRI-MUNICIPAL WER IM 37 TARAUNI TRN KN 3 EDU LAF KW 14 IPOKIA PKA OG PLATEAU 3 DAMATURU DTR YB 6 ARM Pension Managers Limited 0026 S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 12 HAWUL HWL BO 14 OVIA-NORTH-EAST AKA ED 26 26 OWERRI-NORTH RRT IM 38 TOFA TEA KN 4 EKITI ARP KW 15 OBAFEMI OWODE WDE OG S/N LGA NAME LGA STATE 4 FIKA FKA YB 7 Trustfund Pensions Plc 0028 CODE CODE 13 JERE JRE BO 15 OVIA-SOUTH-WEST GBZ ED 27 27 OWERRI-WEST UMG IM 39 TSANYAWA TYW KN 5 IFELODUN SHA KW 16 ODEDAH DED OG CODE CODE 5 FUNE FUN YB 8 First Guarantee Pension Limited 0029 1 AGUATA AGU AN 14 KAGA KGG BO 16 OWAN-EAST
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Small Plot Adoption Technology in Agricultural Development Programme, Birnin Kudu Local Government, Jigawa State, Nigeria
    Engineering Research Journal | ISSN: 2782-8212 Vol. 1, Issue 6 (June, 2021) | www.ijaar.org EFFECTIVENESS OF SMALL PLOT ADOPTION TECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, BIRNIN KUDU LOCAL GOVERNMENT, JIGAWA STATE, NIGERIA *ALI ABDU GIGINYU1, BALA ABDU2, HAYATU MISBAHU ABDULLAHI3 AND DANLADI BALA4 *1 Faculty of Education, Federal University Dutse, Email: [email protected] 2State Universal Basic Education Board, Jigawa State Email: [email protected] 3Department of Welding and Fabrication Engineering, Jigawa State Polytechnics Dutse Email: [email protected] 4 Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Anambra State, Nigeria, E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The study investigated the Effectiveness of Small Plot Adoption Techniques (SPAT) in Agricultural Development Programmes in Birnin Kudu Local Government, Jigawa State, Nigeria The objectives of this study were to; identify the scope of small plot adoption technology programme in Birnin Kudu Local Government Area, determine effectiveness of the small pilot adoption technology on farmers’ productivity in Birnin Kudu Lacal Government Area and to examine the challenge facing small plot adoption technology programme in Birnin Kudu Local Government Area. The sample for this study comprised seventy seven (77) farmers and ten (10) extension agents. A stratified random sampling technique was used in selecting the sample from each category. The method of analysis findings of the study small plot adoption technology was found to be effective in terms of irrigation practice, feed formulation, livestock management, and storage technique and marketing. Small Plot Technology improves farmers’ income, accessibility of agricultural credit facility, accessibility of pest and herbicides respectively. The challenges facing SPAT in Birnin Kudu were inadequate number of extension agent’s lack of technical knowhow by extension workers to introduce new packages to farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • (Nigeria) As the Growth Centre of Jigawa State A.A Jolaoye, Garba I.A
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 10, Issue 2, February-2019 300 ISSN 2229-5518 An Investigation into the Performance of Dutse (Nigeria) as the Growth Centre of Jigawa State A.A Jolaoye, Garba I.A Abstract— This paper seeks to investigate some key elements of a growth centre; the principle upon which local government headquarters and state capitals creation rest. It attempts to consider in a spatial dimension, the different channels by which the establishment and development of Dutse (Nigeria) has affected its’ region (the rest major settlements in the state) after twenty-seven years of operation. The paper categorized the effects into three distinct classes: direct, indirect and induced effects. The study area is Dutse Capital, Jigawa state, Nigeria. Particular issues considered are related to population movement, (migration and commuting), industrial linkages/interference, labour recruitment and shopping patterns. Primary data was gathered through closed- ended questionnaires administered to the city’s dwellers, the industrialists and their employees for the various aspect of the study. Descriptive analysis was adopted while presentation of the findings was done with charts and tables. The study reveals that the recruitment of labour has had some pronounced effects on the settlements in the region/state. That notwithstanding, industrial linkage and the gener- ation of economic activities is limited to Dutse itself. In other words, these effects have not appreciably affected the towns and villages in the state. The trickle-down effects of the growth centre have not manifested to a stage reliable enough to sustain economic growth in the state under the investigation Index Terms— Growth centre, region, population movement, industrial linkage, the trickle-down effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Maternal Mortality in Jigawa Central Senatorial District: Trend and Causes
    International Journal of Management and Applied Science, ISSN: 2394-7926 Volume-3, Issue-8, Aug.-2017 http://iraj.in MATERNAL MORTALITY IN JIGAWA CENTRAL SENATORIAL DISTRICT: TREND AND CAUSES MUHAMMAD ABDULKADIR School of preliminary studies Sule lamido university, Kafin hausa Email: [email protected] Abstract: The study examines the spatio temporal pattern of maternal deaths in Jigawa Central Senatorial District of Jigawa State, Nigeria. The objectives of the study include: to determinethe temporal trend and spatial pattern of maternal death and maternal mortality ratio and to identify the common cases of maternal deaths. Hospital based data for the period of five years, from 2010 to 2014 were obtained from General Hospitals, Federal Medical Centre Birnin Kudu and Rasheed Shekoni Specialist Hospital Dutse. Descriptive and inferential statistics(X2 and two way Anova) as well as geographical information system were used for the data analysis. The finding shows that the maternal deaths keep on increasing until in 2014 the figure decline. The 861/100,000 was estimated for the whole five periods, 2014 with the 3,654 per 100,000. The MMR computed for the seven LGA in the study area shows that Birnin Kudu has 1,624 deaths per 100,000, Buji LGA with the 213 death per 100,000 and Miga has 94 deaths per 10,000 which is the lowest. The major obstetric causes of maternal deaths are identified to be anaemia, eclampsia, malaria in pregnancy, PPH and retained placenta. Anaemia is the most important common cause of maternal death in the Jigawa central senatorial district. The finding further gives the recommendation: special attention should be given to the leading causes of maternal deaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Nigeria: Floods
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Nigeria: Floods DREF n° MDRNG030 Glide n° FL-2020-000207-NGA Date of issue: 19 October 2020 Expected timeframe: 4 months Operation start date: 18 October 2020 Expected end date: 28 February 2021 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 247,218 Total number of people affected: 91,254 people (15,209 Number of people to be assisted: Approximately households) 12,000 people i.e. 2,000 households Host National Society(ies) presence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): The DREF will be implemented by Nigerian Red Cross Society (NRCS), primarily through the Branch offices in Jigawa, Kebbi, Kwara, Sokoto and Zamfara. Branch DREF Implementation team: Branch Secretaries, Disaster Management Coordinator, CEA focal point, DREF Focal person, Branch Cash Transfer Focal Points, Branch Communication Coordinators and Health coordinators (5 in each Branch) and 115 volunteers across the 5 states. Headquarter DREF Implementation team: 20 NS staff (4 CTP/DM, 2 CEA/Communication, 1 Health/WASH, 2 Regional Coordinators, 2 PMER, 2 Logistics, 2 Finance, 1 HR, 2 IT and 2 Security staff). Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) and State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) across states, National Metrological Agency (NiMet) and security operatives. <Please click here for the budget and here for the contacts> A. Situation Analysis Description of the disaster On 6 October 2020, flood levels at the hydrological stations monitored in Niamey (Niger Republic) and Malan Ville (Benin Republic) reached the red alert zone due to the intensity of the torrential rainfall and caused flooding in Jigawa, Kebbi, Kwara, Sokoto, and Zamfara state (amongst other states) affecting 91,254 people or 15,209 households.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Security Situation
    Nigeria Security situation Country of Origin Information Report June 2021 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu) PDF ISBN978-92-9465-082-5 doi: 10.2847/433197 BZ-08-21-089-EN-N © European Asylum Support Office, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EASO copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Cover photo@ EU Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid - Left with nothing: Boko Haram's displaced @ EU/ECHO/Isabel Coello (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0), 16 June 2015 ‘Families staying in the back of this church in Yola are from Michika, Madagali and Gwosa, some of the areas worst hit by Boko Haram attacks in Adamawa and Borno states. Living conditions for them are extremely harsh. They have received the most basic emergency assistance, provided by our partner International Rescue Committee (IRC) with EU funds. “We got mattresses, blankets, kitchen pots, tarpaulins…” they said.’ Country of origin information report | Nigeria: Security situation Acknowledgements EASO would like to acknowledge Stephanie Huber, Founder and Director of the Asylum Research Centre (ARC) as the co-drafter of this report. The following departments and organisations have reviewed the report together with EASO: The Netherlands, Ministry of Justice and Security, Office for Country Information and Language Analysis Austria, Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum, Country of Origin Information Department (B/III), Africa Desk Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation (ACCORD) It must be noted that the drafting and review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO.
    [Show full text]
  • Levels of Some Anions in Selected Grains Grown in Jigawa State, Nigeria
    CSJ 12(1): June, 2021 ISSN: 2276 – 707X Musa and Muhammad ChemSearch Journal 12(1): 132 – 135, June, 2021 Publication of Chemical Society of Nigeria, Kano Chapter Received: 20/05/2021 Accepted: 11/06/2021 http://www.ajol.info/index.php/csj Levels of some Anions in Selected Grains Grown in Jigawa State, Nigeria *Musa, M. S. and Muhammad, H. M. Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, Bayero University, P.M.B. 3011, BUK, Kano, Nigeria *Correspondence Email: [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT - - 2- 3- The levels of some anions (NO2 , NO3 , SO4 and PO4 ) in selected grains (rice, maize, millet and corn) grown in some parts of Jigawa state, Nigeria, have been quantitatively determined by spectrophotometric technique. Samples were randomly collected from the sampling locations (Kiyawa, Jahun, Birnin Kudu, Dutse and Gwaram) local government areas of Jigawa state and analysed for their anion contents. Results obtained showed the range of mean concentrations of the anions in the food grains as; nitrite (3.20±0.87 to 17.51±1.06mg/kg), Nitrate (2.59±0.17 to 12.99±1.17 mg/kg), sulphate (8.04.±1.90 to 27.58±0.68mg/kg) and phosphate (8.37±1.77 to 44.30±1.79mg/kg). Nitrite, nitrate and sulphate levels were found to be below the permissible limit set by FAO/WHO. Phosphate was slightly higher than the permissible limit in just one sample (Birnin Kudu corn).Generally, it can be concluded that the grains analysed are safe for human consumption. Keywords: Anions, Grains, Permissible Limit, Random Sampling, Spectrophotometry INTRODUCTION serious problems along the food chain (Ebong and The primary source of food for the ever- Etuk, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Granite Formations and Granite Cavities in Northern Nigeria
    8012096-XEOLOXIA N 33.qxd:maquet. 1 7/1/09 19:47 Página 10 Cadernos Lab. Xeolóxico de Laxe Coruña. 2009. Vol. 34, pp. 13 - 26 ISSN: 0213-4497 As citas bibliográficas dentro do texto poránse en maxúscula e a abreviatura para os seguin- tes autores será: "et al.". Os textos enviados serán sometidos á crítica dos Censores Científicos designados pola Revista. Bibliografía: Autores en maxúsculas e as revistas ou textos citados en cursiva. Granite formations and granite cavities in Os autores dos traballos deberán incluir a súa dirección completa, incluído código postal. northern Nigeria Formaciones graníticas y cavidades Separatas graníticas en el Norte de Nigeria Enviaráse a cada autor un PDF co artículo na versión final. Envío de manuscritos SZENTES, G1. - Os traballos originais enviaránse a: (1) Alte Frankfurter Str. 22b, 61118 Bad Vilbel, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Instituto Universitario de Xeoloxía Recibido: 9/8/2007 Revisado: 10/3/2008 Aceptado: 15/6/2008 Edificio Servicios Centrales de Investigación Campus de Elviña s/n Telephone: (+34) 981 167000 Ext. 2910 Fax: (+34) 981 167172 [email protected] 15071 A Coruña (Spain) incluindo dirección habitual e teléfono. Abstract — Unha vez terminada a impresión, os originais serán devoltos ao seu autor/es, si así o des- exan e expresan. The Author worked as geologist in Northern Nigeria during several years. This study presents — O número máximo de follas que se admitirá por traballo será quince (15) incluindo figu- his experiences concerning the granite formations of the region. The geological base of Northern ras, fotografías, mapas, etc.. Para traballos de maior extensión rógase consultar ao editor Nigeria is the so-called Basement Complex.
    [Show full text]