DOCSLIB.ORG

Data Protection Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Data Protection Committee A Free and Fair Digital Economy Protecting Privacy, Empowering Indians Committee of Experts under the Chairmanship of Justice B.N. Srikrishna TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS ................................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 1: A FREE AND FAIR DIGITAL ECONOMY ................................................................ 3 A. Existing Approaches to Data Protection ....................................................................... 3 B. Understanding the Contours of the Indian Approach ................................................... 4 C. Data Principals and Data Fiduciaries ............................................................................ 7 D. Following Puttaswamy ............................................................................................... 10 E. Chapters in the Report ................................................................................................ 11 F. Methodology ............................................................................................................... 13 G. Summary: A Fourth Way to Privacy, Autonomy and Empowerment ........................ 13 CHAPTER 2: JURISDICTION AND APPLICABILITY ................................................................... 15 A. White Paper and Public Comments ............................................................................ 15 B. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 16 I. Jurisdiction.................................................................................................................. 16 (a) Conceptual Understanding of Jurisdiction ................................................................. 16 (b) Prescriptive Jurisdiction ............................................................................................. 17 (c) The Case for Data Non-Exceptionalism ..................................................................... 18 (d) Putative Bases for Jurisdiction ................................................................................... 18 II. Retrospective and Transitional Application of the Data Protection Law ................... 21 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 23 CHAPTER 3: PROCESSING ....................................................................................................... 24 A. White Paper and Public Comments ............................................................................ 24 B. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 27 I. Building Blocks of the Law ........................................................................................ 27 (a) Personal Data .............................................................................................................. 27 (b) Sensitive Personal Data .............................................................................................. 30 II. Consent ....................................................................................................................... 32 (a) A revised operational framework for consent ............................................................ 33 (b) Consequences of such a Framework .......................................................................... 34 (c) Enforcement of the Revised Framework .................................................................... 35 (d) Standard of Consent ................................................................................................... 36 (e) Different Standards for Different Types of Personal Data Processing ...................... 37 (f) Consent Dashboard and Avoiding Consent Fatigue ................................................... 38 (g) Consent and Contractual Necessity ............................................................................ 40 III. Protection of Children‘s Personal Data ...................................................................... 42 (a) Identification of guardian data fiduciaries .................................................................. 43 (b) Who is a child? ........................................................................................................... 43 (c) Barred Practices .......................................................................................................... 44 (d) Regulatory Approach ................................................................................................. 44 IV. Community Data......................................................................................................... 45 V. Entities to which the Law Applies .............................................................................. 46 i RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 48 CHAPTER 4: OBLIGATIONS OF DATA FIDUCIARIES ............................................................... 49 A. White Paper and Public Comments ............................................................................ 49 B. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 51 I. Fair and Reasonable Processing ................................................................................. 51 II. Purpose Limitation and Data Minimisation................................................................ 52 III. Big Data Challenges to Data Minimisation and Purpose Limitation ......................... 54 IV. Transparency .............................................................................................................. 58 V. Organisational Obligations on Data Fiduciaries ......................................................... 59 VI. Storage Limitation ...................................................................................................... 60 VII. Data Quality ................................................................................................................ 62 VIII. Notification for Data Breach ...................................................................................... 62 (a) Need for Data Breach Notification ............................................................................. 62 (b) What constitutes a Personal Data Breach? ................................................................. 63 (c) When does it need to be notified to the DPA? ........................................................... 64 (d) When does it need to be notified to individuals? ....................................................... 64 IX. Data Security .............................................................................................................. 65 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 67 CHAPTER 5: DATA PRINCIPAL RIGHTS .................................................................................. 68 A. Access, Confirmation and Correction ........................................................................ 68 I. White Paper and Public Comments ............................................................................ 68 II. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 69 B. Rights to Objection, Restriction and Portability ......................................................... 71 I. White Paper and Public Comments ............................................................................ 72 II. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 73 C. The Right to be Forgotten ........................................................................................... 75 I. White Paper and Public Comments ............................................................................ 76 II. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 77 (a) Balancing the Right with Competing Rights and Interests ........................................ 78 (b) Appropriate Entity for the Approval of Requests ...................................................... 79 (c) Breadth of Application of Orders ............................................................................... 80 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 81 CHAPTER 6: TRANSFER OF PERSONAL DATA OUTSIDE INDIA ............................................... 82 A. White Paper and Public Comments ............................................................................ 82 B. Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 83 I. Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Data .................................................................... 83 II. Exceptions to Free Transfer of Personal Data Outside India ..................................... 87 ii (a) Benefits ....................................................................................................................... 88 (b) Costs ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GOVERNMENT of INDIA LAW COMMISSION of INDIA Report No
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA Report No. 248 “Obsolete Laws : Warranting Immediate Repeal” (Interim Report) September, 2014 D.O. No.6(3)211/2011-LC(LS) 12th September, 2014 Dear Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad ji, A project “Identification of Obsolete Laws” was undertaken by the 19th Law Commission suo moto. No significant progress could be made as the term of the Commission ended. The 20th Law Commission thus decided to continue with the project. Various Ministries were approached seeking relevant informations. In the meantime the Hon’ble Union Minister for Law and Justice wrote to the Commission (24th June, 2014) asking its suggestions and recommendations on same subject. Keeping above in view, the Commission decided to undertake a study “The Legal Enactments : Simplifications and Streamlining”. As the study would be completed in instalments, the first of such instalment : “Obsolete Laws : Warranting Immediate Repeal” – An Interim Report No. 248 is being submitted to the Minister. Hope the suggestions and recommendations contained would constitute a major step in the direction of simplifying the legal structure. With warm regards, Yours sincerely, [Ajit Prakash Shah] Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad Hon’ble Minister for Law and Justice Government of India Shastri Bhawan New Delhi - 110115 ii “Obsolete Laws : Warranting Immediate Repeal” (Interim Report) Table of Contents Chapter Title Page 1. Introduction and Background 1-3 2. Methodology: Subject 4-5 Categorisation and Classification 3. Findings, Conclusions and 6-9 Recommendations 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text of Leaked Srikrishna Committee 8Th Chapter
    Full Text of Leaked Srikrishna Committee 8th Chapter (Please concentrate on portions highlighted in blue and red colors. Keeping the length of the chapter in view, we have provided only relevant sections) 5.1 In view of the background of the complex situation, it would be seen that under each of the scenarios listed above, there is a high possibility of immediate agitational backlash in different regions of the State. While a strategy for handling medium and long term internal security dimensions, as discussed in the foregoing paras, that may emerge can be developed as the final decision on the issue is taken by the government, the need of the hour will be to handle the immediate backlash. In this context, the fact that TRS, the most vocal and aggressive amongst the political parties, has held the ‘ Telangana Maha Garjana’ rally at Warangal on December 16, 2010, reportedly attended by nearly 5 lakh people and has also plans to launch a civil disobedience movement after December 31, 2010 while initiating the action under ‘ Maha Yudham’ ( a massive war ) if Centre does not announce a separate Telangana, has to be kept in mind. Now since Telangana Praja Front ( Gaddar) and TRS have come together the situation has become even more serious. 5.2 The most important requirement for addressing the law and order problems that may arise in our view will be i) political clarity in terms of the future course of action and ii) the need for effective governance. The following mechanism is suggested to control the law and order situations that may emerge soon after the report is submitted and becomes public.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 3 6Th January 2011 1. Srikrishna Committee Comes out with 6
    1. Srikrishna Committee comes out with 6 options The Justice Srikrishna Committee, which held wide consultations in the last 11 months on demands for a separate State of Telangana as well as for keeping Andhra Pradesh united, has offered half-a-dozen options on which the government may take a call in about six weeks.The suggestions include keeping Andhra Pradesh in the present form, forming a separate Telangana, and making Hyderabad a Union Territory, the sources said. An extensive examination of the socio-economic factors in all regions of the State led the committee to conclude that there was no material basis for treating only the Telangana districts as “backward,” the sources noted. 2. Ordinance will cover PM, Ministers An ordinance that draws heavily on the long pending Lok Pal Bill is on the anvil, with the United Progressive Alliance government keen on countering the Opposition's no-holds-barred campaign against it in the wake of the public outrage over a slew of scams, apparently involving ministers and party men. The ordinance, which will create a mechanism to deal with corruption involving public personalities including the Prime Minister, Ministers and MPs, is part of the government's strategy to demonstrate that it is serious about ending graft. 3. Minority institutions' right to select staff upheld The right of minority institutions under Article 30 is an absolute right being the basic structure of the Constitution. Therefore, any regulation interfering with the right of administration would not be applicable to minority institutions, being violative of the Constitution, the Madras High Court has said.
    [Show full text]
  • Telangana Tragedy
    Published in: Journal of Indian School of Political Economy Volume XXI, No 1-4 January-March, 2009, April-June 2009, July-September 2009, October-December 2009 THE TELANGANA TRAGEDY - A Lesson in Integration and Disintegration By GAUTAM PINGLE ABSTRACT The movement for a separate Telangana state begins in 1968 and culminates in the two elections results of 2004 and 2009. In 2005, the national political parties supported the Telengana case and in late 2009 almost all state political parties and the Union government accepted the proposition. Thereafter as a result of agitation, a Committee was appointed to re-examine the issue and its report was published. This resulted in further controversy. The history of the Telangana movement may be seen as an unsuccessful exercise in integration of regions with different history, disparities in economic development, elites with varying capacities and conflicting goals. The common language has not been able to unite the two regions even after 54 years. Introduction: Linguistic States in the Republic The history of linguistic states in India is somewhat uneven with occasional emphasis placed on it in pre-Independence days by votaries for and against the notion. The movement takes shape politically and practically in the early 1950’s. The specific issue that precipitated it was the Andhra regions’ demand for a state separate from Madras Province. 1 Nehru was forced to concede this when the agitation became a serious law and order problem which he did so with little grace 2. He, however, then extended the process further by appointing the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation Act 2019
    jftLVªh lañ Mhñ ,yñ—(,u)04@0007@2003—19 REGISTERED NO. DL—(N)04/0007/2003—19 vlk/kkj.k EXTRAORDINARY Hkkx II — [k.M 1 PART II — Section 1 izkf/kdkj ls izdkf'kr PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY lañ 53] ubZ fnYyh] 'kqØokj] vxLr 9] [email protected] 18] 1941 ¼'kd½ No. 53] NEW DELHI, FRIDAY, AUGUST 9, 2019/SHRAVANA 18, 1941 (SAKA) bl Hkkx esa fHkUu i`"B la[;k nh tkrh gS ftlls fd ;g vyx ladyu ds :i esa j[kk tk ldsA Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation. MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Legislative Department) New Delhi, the 9th August, 2019/Shravana 18, 1941 (Saka) The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 9th August, 2019, and is hereby published for general information:— THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR REORGANISATION ACT, 2019 NO. 34 OF 2019 [9th August, 2019.] An Act to provide for the reorganisation of the existing State of Jammu and Kashmir and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventieth Year of the Republic of India as follows:— PART-I PRELIMINARY 1. This Act may be called the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. Short title. 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— Definitions. (a) “appointed day” means the day which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint; (b) “article” means an article of the Constitution; (c) “assembly constituency” and “parliamentary constituency” have the same 43 of 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • Honour Killings and Law in India
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (JHSS) ISSN: 2279-0837, ISBN: 2279-0845. Volume 5, Issue 6 (Nov. - Dec. 2012), PP 28-31 Www.Iosrjournals.Org Honour Killings and Law in India Puneet Kaur Grewal Senior Research Fellow Department cum Centre for Women’s Studies and Development, Panjab University Chandigarh, India Abstract: The paper aims at highlighting the legal provisions to tackle with the crime of honour killing. The introductory part gives a glimpse of what is honour killing and which acts are considered dishonourable by the family or community. Certain acts and behaviour of individuals could become reasons for him or her to be killed by his or her own family especially male family members or the community. The next part illustrates various legal provisions in the Indian Constitution which can be used to put to stop these honour killings in the country. These laws can be used as a tool to put behind bars the khap panchayat members who give orders of killing individuals for the sake of so called honour. The next part explains the international provisions related to honour crimes to which India is signatory. The paper questions as to why despite all these provisions killings are rampant in the present times. Keywords: Crime, Honour killings, International provisions, Law, Rights I. Introduction Honour killing is the “unlawful killing of a woman for her actual or perceived morally or mentally unclean and impure behaviour” (Hassan 1995). Honour killings are murders by families on family members who are said to have brought shame on the honour and name of family (Sheri & Bob Stritof 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • SKC Critique
    A Critique of the Report of the SriKrishna Committee on Telangana by Dr. Gautam Pingle “A much talking judge is an ill-tuned cymbal”: Francis Bacon 1 Introduction The five member SriKrishna Committee (SKC) (“Committee for Consultations On the Situation in Andhra Pradesh” ) under the Chairmanship of Mr Justice B. N .SriKrishna, former Judge of the Supreme Court of India was constituted by the Ministry of Home Affairs, to bring clarity to the Government of India, over the issue of separate statehood for the Telangana region of Andhra Pradesh. The Government had earlier acceded to the All-Party request and support for such a separate state backed up by a unanimous resolution of the Legislature Congress Party leaving the decision to the central Government. However once that decision to accord statehood to Telangana was announced widespread agitation by the Andhra region resulted in a stay of execution and status quo was ordered pending the SriKrishna Committee ‘s report which was to take 11 months. That Report of 505 pages of the main Volume with another 183 pages of Appendix Volume has now been issued and this is an analysis and critique of it. Part I. Honesty within Dishonesty: SKC makes the case for Telangana palku rAvaNuDu teliya lEka pOye (Ravana, could not understand this truth.), “Sarasa Saama Dhaana” by Saint Thyagaraja The Sri Krishna Committee report is a product of eminent persons told to decide what in all honesty they could not; as a result they have concluded in confusion - which serves no one. Among 505 pages and 146,071 words, they had to say some honest things even then, which were obvious to all.
    [Show full text]
  • Unification of Personal Laws in India and Rights of Women
    Social Science Review Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2018 ISSN 2518-6825 Unification of Personal Laws in India and Rights of Women Dr. Mamta Rana1 Abstract Women enjoy a unique position in every society and country of the world. Despite their contribution in all spheres of life, they suffer in silence and form a class, which is in a disadvantaged position because of several barriers and impediments. India, being a country of paradoxes, is no exception. Here too, women, an epitome of Shakti, once given an exalted status, are in need of empowerment-legal, social, political and economic. However, empowerment and equality are based on the gender sensitivity of society towards their problems. The framers of the Constitution were conscious of the unequal treatment and discrimination meted out to the fairer sex from time immemorial and, therefore, included certain general as well as specific provisions for the upliftment of the status of women. Article 14 and 15of the Constitution of India provides for equal protection before law and there shall not be any discrimination based on sex. However, personal laws of different religions vary in laws relating to marriage, divorce, maintenance, succession, adoption and guardianship. There is no uniform civil law pertaining to personal matters however, the uniformity in laws exists in criminal laws on the other side. The Indian Constitution in its part IV, Article 44 directs the State to provide a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India. However, it is only a directive principle of state policy; therefore, it cannot be enforced in a court of law.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-04-03 082053 S Injustice.Pdf
    JUSTICE Srikrishna’s INJUSTICE How SKC Report tried to suppress truth and deceive Telangana & Why India should Reject SKC Report JUSTICE Srikrishna’s INJUSTICE 1 JUSTICE Srikrishna’s INJUSTICE 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, announced the formation of the Committee for Consultations on the Situation in Andhra Pradesh (CCSAP), popularly known as Justice Srikrishna Committee (SKC), the proponents of Telangana Statehood received it with a healthy dose of skepticism. But, the optimist in them overtook the agitator as the Committee boasted of very prominent names as its members. The lakhs of representations to the Committee - demanding the formation of Telangana State - underline this optimism that Justice Srikrishna will do justice to the beleaguered region at last. Telangana Development Forum (TDF), a not-for-profit, apolitical organization of Telangana citizens and Telangana NRIs worldwide, too submitted its report ‘Deprivation to Telangana: Case for Separate Statehood’ and TDF INDIA appeared before SKC & presented its case to the Srikrishna Committee on 7th May, 2010. The report, prepared by experts from diverse fields, was received with appreciation for its objectivity and professionalism. Following up the report, the members of TDF worldwide, held a video conference with the Committee on 16th June, 2010. Like crores of fellow Telanganites, TDF members too awaited the Committee’s report with a bated breath unknowing that they were in for a rude shock! The Srikrishna Committee, wisely, ends its report with this quote of Sri Vallabhbhai Patel: “...it will be a folly to ignore realities; facts take their revenge if they are not faced squarely and well”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Common Civil Code for Contemporary India
    PESQUISA – Vol.4, Issue-1, May 2019 ISSN-2455-0736 (Print) www.pesquisaonline.net ISSN-2456-4052 (Online) A Common Civil Code for Contemporary India ANITHA. A Faculty of Law, SRM School of Law, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India. Email: [email protected] Article History ABSTRACT Received: 1 April 2019 India is a multicultural and multilingual country having en-number of Received in revised form: customary and religious practices. The Major religious denominations in India 18 May 2019 Accepted: 20 May 2019 are Hindu, Muslims and Christians; they follow their own personal laws. Personal laws are the system of rules which deals with marriage, succession, KEY WORDS: adoption, maintenance and guardianship. Thus each and every person is uniform civil code- governed by their own religious and customary practices. There is no common Hindu Period- personal to all the religion. This variation in personal laws leads to many Muslim Period- complications for instance as the Muslims are allowed to marry four wives British period- simultaneously, many of the Hindus and Christian male are converting to constitutional Islam merely for the sake of marriage, hence there is a dare need for uniform provisions - Judicial civil code for modern India. decisions- INTRODUCTION “One country, one nationality, one citizenship, and one legal system is axiomatic and we cannot think in terms of personal laws that vary with communities, religions and sects”- Justice Krishna Iyer. (V.R, 1986) A common civil code is a process whereby family law is impressed with a secular character so that citizenship as Indian, not his particular religion, sect or school, will pronounce the prescriptions (V.R, 1986) and proscriptions that govern his economic, social and other temporal affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological List of Central Acts ------Page: 1
    CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF CENTRAL ACTS -------- PAGE: 1 Name of the Act Year Act No -------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bengal Indigo Contracts Act 1836 10 Bengal Districts Act 1836 21 Madras Public Property Malversation Act 1837 36 Bengal Bonded Warehouse Association Act 1838 5 Coasting Vessels Act 1838 19 Madras Rent and Revenue Sales Act 1839 7 Bengal Land Revenue Sales Act 1841 12 Revenue, Bombay 1842 13 Revenue Commissioners, Bombay 1842 17 Sales of Land for Revenue Arrears 1845 1 Boundary-marks, Bombay 1846 3 Boundaries 1847 1 Bengal Alluvion and Diluvion Act 1847 9 Bengal Land Holders' Attendance Act 1848 20 Madras Revenue Commissioner Act 1849 10 Judicial Officers Protection Act 1850 18 Calcutta Land-revenue Act 1850 23 Forfeited Deposits Act 1850 25 Improvements in Towns 1850 26 Indian Tolls Act 1851 8 Madras City Land Revenue Act 1851 12 Bombay Rent-free Estates Act 1852 11 Rent Recovery Act 1853 6 Shore Nuisances (Bombay and Kolaba) Act 1853 11 Bengal Bonded Warehouse Association Act 1854 5 Police, Agra 1854 16 Legal Representatives' Suits Act 1855 12 Fatal Accidents Act 1855 13 Usury Laws Repeal Act 1855 28 Bengal Embankment Act 1855 32 Sonthal Parganas Act 1855 37 Indian Bills of Lading Act 1856 9 Calcutta Land-revenue Act 1856 18 Bengal Chaukidari Act 1856 20 Tobacco Duty (Town of Bombay) Act 1857 4 Oriental Gas Company 1857 5 Madras Compulsory Labour Act 1858 1 Bengal Ghatwali Lands Act 1859 5 Bengal Rent Act 1859 10 Bengal Land Revenue
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson : 1 Meaning, Characteristics and Types of a Company
    LESSON : 1 MEANING, CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPES OF A COMPANY STRUCTURE 1.0 Objective 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Meaning of Company 1.3 Characteristics of a Company 1.4 Distinction between Company and Partnership 1.5 Types of Company 1.6 Summary 1.7 Keywords 1.8 Self Assessment Questions 1.9 Suggested Readings 1.0 OBJECTIVE After reading this lesson, you should be able to: (a) Define a company and explain its features. (b) Make a distribution between company and partnership firm. (c) Explain the various types of companies. 1.1 INTRODUCTION Industrial has revolution led to the emergence of large scale business organizations. These organization require big investments and the risk involved is very high. Limited resources and unlimited liability of partners are two important limitations of partnerships of partnerships in undertaking big business. Joint Stock Company form of business organization has become extremely popular as it provides a solution to (1) overcome the limitations of partnership business. The Multinational companies like Coca-Cola and, General Motors have their investors and customers spread throughout the world. The giant Indian Companies may include the names like Reliance, Talco Bajaj Auto, Infosys Technologies, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., and Larsen and Tubro etc. 1.2 MEANING OF COMPANY Section 3 (1) (i) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines a company as “a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company”. Section 3(1) (ii) Of the act states that “an existing company means a company formed and registered under any of the previous companies laws”. This definition does not reveal the distinctive characteristics of a company .
    [Show full text]