DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplement to Synopsis of Debate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplement to Synopsis of Debate RAJYA SABHA _________ ∗SUPPLEMENT TO SYNOPSIS OF DEBATE _________ (Proceedings other than Questions and Answers) _________ Thursday, February 20, 2014/Phalguna 01, 1935 (Saka) _________ GOVERNMENT BILL The Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Bill, 2014 –Contd. THE MINISTER OF STATE OF THE MINISTRY OF TOURISM (DR. K. CHIRANJEEVI), making his maiden speech, said: This is my maiden speech. Today I am talking on behalf of all the Telugu people, not on behalf of any one region. Crores of Telugu people are being deprived of their rights in an unfair manner. The process adopted to divide the State is very, very unfortunate. The State and the people can’t be divided like this. Srikrishna Committee also concluded, only united Andhra Pradesh is the best option. The manner in which the Bill was tabled in the cabinet meting as a table item was a pity. This House must remember the fact that the Congress Party was the last party that took a decision on this bifurcation. BJP always promised to create Telangana State. The TDP gave a letter supporting the bifurcation. They have done more damage to the Seemandhra people than anybody else. It is because of the opportunistic ways of these parties that things have come to this situation today. The Telugu people will be the losers. We must ___________________________________________________ ∗This Synopsis is not an authoritative record of the proceedings of the Rajya Sabha. 96 remember that the development of Hyderabad is due to the collective efforts of all the Telugu people. We have to reflect the emotions of the people because we are representatives of the people. Hyderabad is people's lifeline, source of livelihoods, destination for educational and employment opportunities and destination of dreams. During the last three decades, the development in various sectors that has taken place in Hyderabad is because of the contribution of the Seemandhra people. So, we want that Hyderabad should be made a UT on the lines of Chandigarh. It is said that it will remain a 'common Capital' for ten years. I don't know whether the term 'common Capital' has any meaning constitutionally. After Seemandhra builds matching infrastructure and generates opportunities, it can be made a part of Telangana. So, I request you to make this amendment in the Bill. The Central Government will have to take full responsibility in implementing rivers linking multipurpose Polavaram Project without any hurdles. The assets and liabilities must be distributed proportionately. The huge revenue deficit, which Seemandhra will encounter after bifurcation, needs to be addressed. There should be a special financial package to fill this revenue deficit. Andhra Pradesh should be given a special category status so that development takes place there. In that category, tax exemptions and tax holidays must be given for a minimum of 10 years. A special package should also be given to the North Coastal Andhra Pradesh. Only with these things, there will be equal justice to the people of all religions. Without these changes, I strongly feel that the Bill cannot be passed. KM. MAYAWATI: Our Party supports the creation of the new State, Telangana. Andhra Pradesh is being bifurcated thorough this Bill. Hyderabad has been made the common capital for both the new States. This common capital will become bone of contention between both the States. We have a case of Chandigarh where Punjab and Haryana are confronting. We demand that the issue related to capital should be addressed early. Seemandhra should be given a special package. Telangana is a backward State with population of 97 SCs, STs, and OBCs, and upper caste people are living in a miserable conditions there. Therefore Telangana should also be given special package alongwith Seemandhara. Other States of the country, whose financial condition is not sound, should also be given special packages. There should be no politics in providing financial package. People of Telangana had to struggle hard over the years while it should have been created without any struggle and blood shed. Division of large States is in the interest of the nation as small administrative unit can give better results. We had also demanded that Uttar Pradesh might be divided into four parts but the Central Government have not paid any attention to our demand. Reorganisation is causing a serious problem regarding inclusion of OBCs in the list of SCs and STs. Many castes of OBC should be included in the list of SCs and STs and a commission for this purpose should be constituted at the national level. SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Both I and my party completely oppose this bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh. It is an irony that Andhra Pradesh is being divided today. The people, who are united by language, are being divided and all this is being done for some material gain. A sheer electoral opportunism is leading to the division of the State. I want this august House to act seriously and send back this legislation to the Lok Sabha by rejecting it and saying that we will not violate the linguistic reorganization of the Indian States. You cannot do this disservice to our country. In allocation of resources, all should be considered equally. Please, reconsider your decision and do not open a Pandora’s Box for India. It is not in India’s interest. SHRI N. K. SINGH: I wish to certainly bring some serious infirmities which are contained in this Bill. This Bill is a strange Bill because it does not contain any objects and Reasons normally contained in the Bills. It also does not contain a Financial Memorandum, which stipulates the likely expenditure and the likely revenue. It does not even lay down any monetary mechanism which monitors the administration of fiscal package. This Bill is a serious discrimination against other States, which are similarly eligible. I 98 hope that the economic logic and merits of the case would prompt him to give similar benefits to the seven States which have been identified by the Raghuram Rajan Committee’s Report. PROF. RAM GOPAL YADAV: I strongly oppose this Bill because it is not only the division of Andhra Pradesh but also division of the people. It is a direct attack on the federal structure of the country. It is the first time when a state is being divided against the will of the people and the legislative Assembly of that state. This Bill is against the democratic conventions and is unconstitutional. I urge upon the Government to withdraw this Bill in the public interest. SHRIMATI KANIMOZHI: The Government has not been able to build consensus among all the stakeholders in this case. I think it is very important to take into consideration the sentiments of the State Assembly which represents the true spirit of the people. That has not been done and it raises a lot of questions about the federal structure of this country. We oppose this Bill and we walk out of this. SHRI C. M. RAMESH: This is a totally illegal Bill. I rise to oppose this Bill. SHRI PRAKASH JAVADEKAR: My party is of the view that creation of Telangana and justice to Seemandhra could be done simultaneously. The Congress party is responsible for what is happening in Andhra Pradesh today. In NDA regime three new states were created successfully and everyone was happy with the decision. Hyderabad which is the part of Telangana would remain the capital of both the states for ten years, but for that justice should be done with Seemandhra also. SHRI V. HANUMANTHA RAO: I rise to support this Bill. Between 1954-56 Andhra was in Madras Province. In 1956 they came to Hyderabad. They have meted out injustice to the Telangana people in the matter of employment, education, irrigation and other things. Now they are saying it is a division. But it is not a division like Uttarakhand, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh. So far as a package for Rayalaseema is concerned, 99 we are not against it but at the same time injustice should not be done to the people of Telangana. I request all the hon. Members to support this Bill. I Congratulate the Hon’ble Prime Minister and the Home Minister. The state may be divided but the people should not be divided. SHRI SHASHI BHUSAN BEHERA: The Congress Party has failed to pass a resolution on Hyderabad Assembly. I must say that the Biju Janata Dal and my chief Minister are certainly against the bifurcation of smaller States. Government has not taken adequate care to address the concerns and problems of the people of Seemandhra. What about the Raghuram Rajan Committee Report? Why are the backward States being neglected? We are not opposed to Special Category Status to any State. The Polavaram project is being opposed seriously by Odisha and Chhattisgarh. The Government must examine the legal and constitutional side of the Bill. DR. JANARDHAN WAGHMARE: I rise to support the Bill. The demand is justified. The concerns of Seemandhra people have to be taken into consideration and a special package has to be given to them. SHRI DEVENDER GOUD T.: We support the Bill. The Telugu Desam Party want that the problems and difficulties that may arise in the Seemandhra region should also be addressed and solved with the same kind of commitment. ♣SHRIMATI GUNDU SUDHARANI: (Spoke in Telugu.) SHRI D. RAJA: My party supports this Bill. It does not mean that we support every other demand. Our party supports that Hyderabad should remain as a common Capital for ten years. There is a need to address all concerns and sincere apprehensions of the people of Seemandhra. So my party demands that Government should allocate adequate funds for the establishment of a new capital for ___________________________________________________ ♣Synopsis of speech delivered by Hon'ble Member in Telugu will be published separately as supplement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Full Text of Leaked Srikrishna Committee 8Th Chapter
    Full Text of Leaked Srikrishna Committee 8th Chapter (Please concentrate on portions highlighted in blue and red colors. Keeping the length of the chapter in view, we have provided only relevant sections) 5.1 In view of the background of the complex situation, it would be seen that under each of the scenarios listed above, there is a high possibility of immediate agitational backlash in different regions of the State. While a strategy for handling medium and long term internal security dimensions, as discussed in the foregoing paras, that may emerge can be developed as the final decision on the issue is taken by the government, the need of the hour will be to handle the immediate backlash. In this context, the fact that TRS, the most vocal and aggressive amongst the political parties, has held the ‘ Telangana Maha Garjana’ rally at Warangal on December 16, 2010, reportedly attended by nearly 5 lakh people and has also plans to launch a civil disobedience movement after December 31, 2010 while initiating the action under ‘ Maha Yudham’ ( a massive war ) if Centre does not announce a separate Telangana, has to be kept in mind. Now since Telangana Praja Front ( Gaddar) and TRS have come together the situation has become even more serious. 5.2 The most important requirement for addressing the law and order problems that may arise in our view will be i) political clarity in terms of the future course of action and ii) the need for effective governance. The following mechanism is suggested to control the law and order situations that may emerge soon after the report is submitted and becomes public.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 3 6Th January 2011 1. Srikrishna Committee Comes out with 6
    1. Srikrishna Committee comes out with 6 options The Justice Srikrishna Committee, which held wide consultations in the last 11 months on demands for a separate State of Telangana as well as for keeping Andhra Pradesh united, has offered half-a-dozen options on which the government may take a call in about six weeks.The suggestions include keeping Andhra Pradesh in the present form, forming a separate Telangana, and making Hyderabad a Union Territory, the sources said. An extensive examination of the socio-economic factors in all regions of the State led the committee to conclude that there was no material basis for treating only the Telangana districts as “backward,” the sources noted. 2. Ordinance will cover PM, Ministers An ordinance that draws heavily on the long pending Lok Pal Bill is on the anvil, with the United Progressive Alliance government keen on countering the Opposition's no-holds-barred campaign against it in the wake of the public outrage over a slew of scams, apparently involving ministers and party men. The ordinance, which will create a mechanism to deal with corruption involving public personalities including the Prime Minister, Ministers and MPs, is part of the government's strategy to demonstrate that it is serious about ending graft. 3. Minority institutions' right to select staff upheld The right of minority institutions under Article 30 is an absolute right being the basic structure of the Constitution. Therefore, any regulation interfering with the right of administration would not be applicable to minority institutions, being violative of the Constitution, the Madras High Court has said.
    [Show full text]
  • Telangana Tragedy
    Published in: Journal of Indian School of Political Economy Volume XXI, No 1-4 January-March, 2009, April-June 2009, July-September 2009, October-December 2009 THE TELANGANA TRAGEDY - A Lesson in Integration and Disintegration By GAUTAM PINGLE ABSTRACT The movement for a separate Telangana state begins in 1968 and culminates in the two elections results of 2004 and 2009. In 2005, the national political parties supported the Telengana case and in late 2009 almost all state political parties and the Union government accepted the proposition. Thereafter as a result of agitation, a Committee was appointed to re-examine the issue and its report was published. This resulted in further controversy. The history of the Telangana movement may be seen as an unsuccessful exercise in integration of regions with different history, disparities in economic development, elites with varying capacities and conflicting goals. The common language has not been able to unite the two regions even after 54 years. Introduction: Linguistic States in the Republic The history of linguistic states in India is somewhat uneven with occasional emphasis placed on it in pre-Independence days by votaries for and against the notion. The movement takes shape politically and practically in the early 1950’s. The specific issue that precipitated it was the Andhra regions’ demand for a state separate from Madras Province. 1 Nehru was forced to concede this when the agitation became a serious law and order problem which he did so with little grace 2. He, however, then extended the process further by appointing the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC).
    [Show full text]
  • SKC Critique
    A Critique of the Report of the SriKrishna Committee on Telangana by Dr. Gautam Pingle “A much talking judge is an ill-tuned cymbal”: Francis Bacon 1 Introduction The five member SriKrishna Committee (SKC) (“Committee for Consultations On the Situation in Andhra Pradesh” ) under the Chairmanship of Mr Justice B. N .SriKrishna, former Judge of the Supreme Court of India was constituted by the Ministry of Home Affairs, to bring clarity to the Government of India, over the issue of separate statehood for the Telangana region of Andhra Pradesh. The Government had earlier acceded to the All-Party request and support for such a separate state backed up by a unanimous resolution of the Legislature Congress Party leaving the decision to the central Government. However once that decision to accord statehood to Telangana was announced widespread agitation by the Andhra region resulted in a stay of execution and status quo was ordered pending the SriKrishna Committee ‘s report which was to take 11 months. That Report of 505 pages of the main Volume with another 183 pages of Appendix Volume has now been issued and this is an analysis and critique of it. Part I. Honesty within Dishonesty: SKC makes the case for Telangana palku rAvaNuDu teliya lEka pOye (Ravana, could not understand this truth.), “Sarasa Saama Dhaana” by Saint Thyagaraja The Sri Krishna Committee report is a product of eminent persons told to decide what in all honesty they could not; as a result they have concluded in confusion - which serves no one. Among 505 pages and 146,071 words, they had to say some honest things even then, which were obvious to all.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-04-03 082053 S Injustice.Pdf
    JUSTICE Srikrishna’s INJUSTICE How SKC Report tried to suppress truth and deceive Telangana & Why India should Reject SKC Report JUSTICE Srikrishna’s INJUSTICE 1 JUSTICE Srikrishna’s INJUSTICE 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS When the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, announced the formation of the Committee for Consultations on the Situation in Andhra Pradesh (CCSAP), popularly known as Justice Srikrishna Committee (SKC), the proponents of Telangana Statehood received it with a healthy dose of skepticism. But, the optimist in them overtook the agitator as the Committee boasted of very prominent names as its members. The lakhs of representations to the Committee - demanding the formation of Telangana State - underline this optimism that Justice Srikrishna will do justice to the beleaguered region at last. Telangana Development Forum (TDF), a not-for-profit, apolitical organization of Telangana citizens and Telangana NRIs worldwide, too submitted its report ‘Deprivation to Telangana: Case for Separate Statehood’ and TDF INDIA appeared before SKC & presented its case to the Srikrishna Committee on 7th May, 2010. The report, prepared by experts from diverse fields, was received with appreciation for its objectivity and professionalism. Following up the report, the members of TDF worldwide, held a video conference with the Committee on 16th June, 2010. Like crores of fellow Telanganites, TDF members too awaited the Committee’s report with a bated breath unknowing that they were in for a rude shock! The Srikrishna Committee, wisely, ends its report with this quote of Sri Vallabhbhai Patel: “...it will be a folly to ignore realities; facts take their revenge if they are not faced squarely and well”.
    [Show full text]
  • P2:Layout 1.Qxd
    Fact File THE GLOBAL TIMES | MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 2 Newsbased Classroom A mosquito has 47 teeth. Presented by AIS Noida Telangana: India’s 29th state ? Graphic: Ravinder Gusain ith the union government all set to give a final push Wto the division of Andhra Pradesh to facilitate the creation of Telangana during the monsoon session of the parliament, what needs to be seen is whether the Centre’s move is governed by the upcoming general elections and whether the creation of Telangana would fragment the country further and fuel the Timeline of demand for separate statehood in other parts too. AIS Noida Telangana protests brings to you a complete 1948: The Indian Army annexes princely state of Hyderabad, which had different regions in- lowdown on the history of cluding Telangana. Telangana protests, its 1950: Telangana becomes a part of Hyderabad creation and the state with senior administrator MK Vellodi as the appointed chief minister. affect it will have on 1952: Burgula Ramakrishna Rao becomes the the geo-political first elected chief minister after first elections in Hyderabad. situation of the country. 1956: Telangana merges with Andhra state, which was carved out of Madras state, to form Andhra Pradesh, a united state for Telugu-speak- ing people. 1969: Over 300 people are killed in police firing during 'Jai Telangana' movement which calls for separate statehood for Telangana. 1972: 'Jai Andhra' movement begins in coastal Andhra for a separate Andhra state. 1975: Presidential order issued to implement Six-Point Formula, providing some safeguards to Telangana. 1997: Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) supports de- mand for Telangana state and in 1998 elections promises 'One vote two states'.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Personal Data Protection (PDP) Bill 2018
    RECOMMENDATIONS ON DRAFT PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION BILL 2018 CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH CENTRE & CYBER PEACE FOUNDATION PROCEEDINGS OF WORKSHOP CONDUCTED ON DRAFT DATA PROTECTION BILL (2018) Foreword The Information Age as we have seen is a positive outcome of Technology. However, it comes With its own national security challenges. As with all ages right fromthe Stone Age, Bronze Age etc in human history, natibns and societies that adapt and recognize these challenges and opportunities prevail while others decline. While many see these opportunities in a positive manner and use it accordingly, others seize the openings fornegative purposes. The 21st century and the information revolution bring about rapid and disruptive changes at a pace that have never been witnessed in human history. In this context the Supreme Court of India recognizing Privacy as a fundamental right of citizens in the 'Puttaswamy vs Union of India' is historical with profoundimplications for India. The data protection whitepaper by the Justice Srikrishna committee is a logical step by the government and will eventually lead to a Privacy Law. The Cyber SecurityResearch Centre (CSRC); Punjab Engineering College (PEC) organizing this workshop to review this White Paper from a national security viewpoint is a welcome and extremely important initiative. With India rushing into the Information Age with projects like Digital India, 100 smart cities and Aadhar. There is an urgent need fora legal framework to address the billions of sensors filled with personal data, a large-scale surveillance network that will exist without constitutional safeguards. Redefining effects to protect this data is a necessary step toward providing a measure of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Imbalance in the Indian State of Andhra Pradesh with Special Reference to Telengana
    REGIONAL IMBALANCE IN THE INDIAN STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TELENGANA A Dissertation submitted to the Tilak Maharashtra University Towards the Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE Submitted by: Supervised by: Robinson. Undrasi (Rg. No: 2207012987) Dr. Manik Sonawane Principal, (SDA) Head, Dept.of Political science, Mumbai Central. T.M.V. Sadashiv Peth, Pune DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE TILAK MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY SADASHIV PETH, PUNE 411031 JANUARY 2013 DECLARATION BY THE CANDIDATE I, Robinson Undrasi declare on oath that the references and literature which are quoted in my dissertation entitle “Regional imbalance in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh with special reference to Telangana” are from original sources and are acknowledged at the appropriate place in the dissertation. I declare further that I have not used this information for any purpose other than my research. Place : Mumbai Date : January, 2013 (Robinson Undrasi) Dr. Manik D. Sonawane Post-Graduate Dept. of Political M.A., M.Phil, Ph.d. Science and Public Administration, Head of the Department Tilak Maharashtra Vidya Peeth Sadashiv Peth, Pune. 411030 Ph. 020-24454866 ==================================================== CERTIFICATE BY GUIDE This is Certified that the work incorporated in his ‘M.Phil’ dissertation “Regional imbalance in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh with special reference to Telangana” submitted by Robinson Undrasi was carried out under my supervision. Such material as obtained from other sources has been duly acknowledged in the dissertation. Date: / / Dr. Manik D. Sonawane ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I express my sincere gratitude to my guide Dr. Manik Sonawane, Head of Department of Political Science Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeth for his valuable guidance, critical comments, encourage and constent inspiration throughout this course of investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Andhra Pradesh Non-Resident Indians (APNRI)
    Andhra Pradesh Non-Resident Indians (APNRI) A Plea for a United Andhra Pradesh State To The Srikrishna Committee for Consultations on the Situation in Andhra Pradesh March 21, 2010 Andhra Pradesh NRI Submission Contributors and Core Committee Members Contact Information Submission Contributors Andhra Pradesh NRI Role Name 41 Saddleview Drive Royersford, PA 19648, USA Submission Prepared by Nalamotu Chakravarthy Venkat Mondeddu AP NRI organization contacts: For questions about this submission, Punnam Manthena 1. Punnam Manthena please contact: Srinivas Modukuri 2. Sailaja Adluru Nalamotu Chakravarthy Submission Contributors Srinivas Vemula E-mail: [email protected] Vimal Kavuru Satya Nemana Dr. Ramesh Eluri Sailaja Adluru AP NRI Core Committee Members Name District Region United States Name District Region United States Sailaja Adluru Chittoor Rayalaseema Philadelphia Chakravarthy Nalamotu Nalgonda Telangana Punnam Manthena Hyderabad Telangana New York New Jersey Ramana Koganti Nizamabad Telangana Ramesh Kodali Krishna Coastal Andhra New York New Jersey Srinivas Modukuri Guntur Coastal Andhra Ramana Devulapalli Chittoor Rayalaseema Phoenix New Jersey Sarit Kommineni Hyderabad Telangana Ajay Jasthi Krishna Coastal Andhra Phoenix New Jersey Jayaram Kode Krishna Coastal Andhra Satya Nemana Srikakulam Coastal Andhra Phoenix New Jersey Prasad Kavuru Krishna Coastal Andhra Vijay Annapureddy Hyderabad Telangana Virginia Maryland Venu Nelluri Khammam Telangana Bhakta Balla Anantapuram Rayalaseema Boston Bay Area Venkat Mondeddu Guntur Coastal Andhra Srinivas Vemula Khammam Telangana Atlanta Bay Area Ravi Singareddy Nizamabad Telangana Vimal Kavuru Hyderabad Telangana Atlanta New York Anil Lingameneni Guntur Coastal Andhra Satish Vemana Kadapa Rayalaseema Canada Washington D.C. Venkateswar Rao Kola Krishna Coastal Andhra Canada Page 2 APNRI: http://www.andhrapradeshnri.org A Plea for a United Andhra Pradesh State Andhra Pradesh NRI About Us • APNRI was formed by the non-resident Telugu Indians living in the United States and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    © December 2017 | IJIRT | Volume 4 Issue 7 | ISSN: 2349-6002 The Separate State Telangana Movement A - Study Dr. K. Yesudasu M.A, Ph.D., M.C.A., Ph.D., B.Ed., Asst. Professor, Dept. of Public Administration, Kakatiya University TELANGANA PROTESTS MOVEMENT - 1969 In 1973 a political settlement was reached with the TO 1985 Government of India with a Six-Point Formula. It was agreed upon by the leaders of the two regions to In 1969: This year saw the first of the protests from prevent any recurrence of such agitations in the the Telangana region. Some students protested future. To avoid legal problems, constitution was “implementation of the safe guards from Andhra amended (32nd amendment) to give the legal sanctity Pradesh” while some protested for a “Separate to the Six-point formula. Telangana”. The local newspaper Indian Express In 1985, when Telangana employees complained reported that the latter group were dominant. about the violations to six point formula, government According to the 19 January 1969 edition of The enacted government order 610 (GO 610) to correct Indian Express, the agitation turned violent when a the violations in recruitment. As Telangana people crowd attempted to set fire to a sub-inspector‟s complained about non implementation of GO 610, in residence. 17 were injured in Police firing. 2001, government constituted Girgiani commission Discussions about the promised safe-guards were to look into violations. held. The Telangana Regional Committee was, In 1997, the state unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party however, not fully convinced of the outcome.1 This (BJP) passed a resolution seeking a separate agitation was met by a counter agitation by the Telangana.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Perceptions of the Telangana Issue
    International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2017, PP 31-38 ISSN 2349-0373 (Print) & ISSN 2349-0381 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0407005 www.arcjournals.org People’s Perceptions of the Telangana Issue: A Study with Reference to the Perceptions of Students Dr.M. Yaznasri Manikarnika Faculty Member, Department of Mass Communication & Journalism, Yogi Vemana University Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh Abstract: The issue of Telangana is as old as human memory continues to remain intact. Telangana comprising ten districts was an integral part of Nizam State. Though India attained independence, the people of Telangana were forced to be under the tyrannical rule of Nizam. Only with patel’s intervention through the army action Telangana became an integral part of Indian Union. Subsequently Telangana was merged with Andhra State leading to the formation a United Andhra Pradesh. Ever since its merger, the people of Telangana started raising their voice for the formation a separate State of Telangana. The paper highlights all the developments that took place till the formation of Telangana State on 2nd June 2015. Keywords: Telangana, perception agitation, participation, Indian Union Razakars, Operation polo, Mulki Common language. 1. INTRODUCTION The word “Telangana” has attracted the ample attention of the people not only of Andhra Pradesh but also the entire country and across the globe as well. The Telangana issue, therefore, continues to be discussed, debated and analyzed by people belonging to all the sections of society on the one hand and by the institutions- political and social, on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Protection Committee
    A Free and Fair Digital Economy Protecting Privacy, Empowering Indians Committee of Experts under the Chairmanship of Justice B.N. Srikrishna TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS ................................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 1: A FREE AND FAIR DIGITAL ECONOMY ................................................................ 3 A. Existing Approaches to Data Protection ....................................................................... 3 B. Understanding the Contours of the Indian Approach ................................................... 4 C. Data Principals and Data Fiduciaries ............................................................................ 7 D. Following Puttaswamy ............................................................................................... 10 E. Chapters in the Report ................................................................................................ 11 F. Methodology ............................................................................................................... 13 G. Summary: A Fourth Way to Privacy, Autonomy and Empowerment ........................ 13 CHAPTER 2: JURISDICTION AND APPLICABILITY ................................................................... 15 A. White Paper and Public Comments ............................................................................ 15 B. Analysis .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]