Annunciations to Maryam in the Qur'ān

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annunciations to Maryam in the Qur'ān ANNUNCIATIONS TO MARYAM IN THE QUR’ĀN: JEWISH-CHRISTIAN SUBTEXTS, MILIEU, AND TYPOLOGY By Kendra Fiddler Presented to the faculty of Dallas International University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with major in Abrahamic Studies, Islamic Studies Concentration Dallas International University April 27, 2021 © 2021 Kendra Fiddler All rights reserved. ABSTRACT The Annunciations to Maryam in the Qur’ān: Jewish-Christian Subtexts, Milieu, and Typology Kendra Fiddler Master of Arts with major in Abrahamic Studies, Dallas International University, April 2021 Supervising Professor: Mark Harlan The annunciation narratives to Maryam in the Qur’ān about the birth of ‘Isā show profound familiarity with the Jewish and Christian texts, traditions, and debates of Late Antiquity. This paper analyzes the literary artistry, intertextualities, subtexts, and typologies of Q3 (al-‘Imran) and Q19 (Maryam). Jewish-Christian and intra-Christian conflict over Mary’s virtue and status, as well as Jesus’ birth, shed light on several qur’ānic passages about the two. For Judaism and Christianity leading up to the seventh century, Mariology depends on Christology; the Qur’ān’s treatment is likely the same. In light of the Qur’ān’s awareness of Jewish-Christian Christological and Mariological conflicts, traditional Islamic understandings of the nature and work of ‘Isā are challenged: Q5:116 may be refuting a Christian tritheism in popular piety that was not official doctrine; Q5:75 and ‘Isā’s birth narratives may be anti-Docetist; Q4:157 may repudiate Talmudic claims about why and how Jesus died, not that he died. DEDICATION To Mia and Maaike, my fellow poet-souls and sisters, whose gentleness and fierceness strengthen me and who know I would have much preferred to write this whole thing in poetry: Mo sheasamh ort, lá na choise tinne.* *This Irish phrase is an expression of trust, translating as, “You are my standing on the day when my feet are sore.” From Pádraig Ó Tuama, Readings from the Book of Exile. vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my professors, Dr. Mark Harlan, Dr. Jeff (and Pat) Feinberg, and Dr. Kurt Richardson: I am so grateful to have been the recipient of your wisdom, knowledge, and care over the past several years. Thank you for introducing me to the Abrahamic approach and for helping to “easternize” my thinking. Your expertise and wisdom have impacted me greatly. To my third thesis committee member, Dr. Philip Jenkins, thank you for your advice, guidance, and encouragement throughout this process. You’ve been wonderful to work with. My gratitude is also due to Gabriel Reynolds, whose book The Qur’ān and Its Biblical Subtext first interested me in the intertextualities of the Abrahamic Scriptures, and in Maryam’s story in particular. I would like to thank my family and friends for enduring my enthusiasm for this topic over various dinner tables for the last few years. If we are still friends, you are very patient. And finally, to the God of Abraham, who is One, who defies our harried attempts at labeling, and who dwells in mystery: Baruch ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha-olam bo’re m’orei ha-esh. April 27, 2021 viii Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. vi Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... viii Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1. Sūrat Maryam and Luke’s Infancy Narrative ............................................................ 10 1.1. Analysis of Sūrat Maryam ..................................................................................... 12 1.2. Intertextuality with Luke 1 ..................................................................................... 25 1.3. The Palm Tree ........................................................................................................ 31 1.4. Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 38 2. Sūrat al-‘Imran and the Protoevangelium of James .................................................. 40 2.1. Analysis of Sūrat al-‘Imran ................................................................................... 40 2.2. Intertextuality with the Protoevangelium of James................................................ 47 2.3. The Question of Prophethood ................................................................................ 55 2.4. Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 69 3. Jewish and Christian Legends of Mary in Dialogue .................................................. 71 3.1. It’s Complicated ..................................................................................................... 71 3.2. Justin’s Dialogue with Trypho and Celsus’ On True Doctrine .............................. 77 3.3. The Yerushalmi’s Mother of the Messiah .............................................................. 80 3.4. Toledot Yeshu ......................................................................................................... 83 3.5. Sefer Zerubbabel’s Two Mothers ........................................................................... 87 3.6. Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 95 4. Tracing Mariology: From Pure Maiden to Mother of God ..................................... 100 4.1. The Councils, Christology, and Mariology .......................................................... 102 4.2. Imperial Involvement ........................................................................................... 109 4.3. Absorbing Roles of Power ................................................................................... 113 4.4. The Qur’ān in Conversation with Christianity ..................................................... 121 4.5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 128 5. Transmitting Typology ............................................................................................ 130 ix 5.1. Maryam/Miriam and ’Isā/Mūsā ........................................................................... 131 5.2. Maryam/Ḥawwā (Eve) and ‘Isā/‘Ādam ............................................................... 140 5.3. Mary/Samuel and Jesus/David ............................................................................. 146 5.4. Maryam and Hājar ................................................................................................ 153 5.5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 156 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 158 Appendix A: Q19:1-58 ................................................................................................... 164 Appendix B: Luke 1:5-40 ............................................................................................... 168 Appendix C: Q3:33-51 .................................................................................................... 170 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 172 Kendra Fiddler CV .......................................................................................................... 181 x Introduction The qur’ānic Maryam is a uniquely honored figure. Maryam is the only woman mentioned by name in the Qur’ān, and furthermore, she has a sūrah named after her—an honor not even given to all the prophets.1 She is named thirty-four times in the Qur’ān, more times than in the New Testament (nineteen).2 She is revered as chosen of God, pure, and strong but also submissive to the will of God. As in Christianity, her purity and her virginal motherhood of ‘Isā are her most important traits. Among the titles for ‘Isā in the Qur’ān—son of Maryam, al-masīḥ (the messiah), word of God, messenger of God, servant of God, mercy from God, sign from God, spirit from God—“son of Mary” is used most frequently, appearing more than twenty times.3 So great is Muslim reverence for Maryam, legends passed down relate that when Muḥammad entered the Ka’ba and smashed the idols he found there, he spared only the images of Maryam and ‘Isā.4 The figure of Mary/Miriam/Maryam5 is of great interest to the three major Abrahamic faiths. For the pre-Islamic Jewish and Christian traditions both, Mariology 1 The prophets who have sūrahs named after them are Yūnus (10), Yūsuf (12), Ibrahīm (14), Muḥammad (47), and Nūh (71). 2 Bahar Davary, “Mary in Islam: ‘No Man Could Have Been Like This Woman,’” New Theology Review 23, no. 3 (August 2010): 27. 3 Q2:87, 253; 3:45; 4:157, 171; 5:17, 46, 72, 75, 78, 110, 112, 114, 116; 9:31; 19:34; 21:91; 23:50; 33:7; 43:57; 57:27; 61:6, 14. All these titles for Jesus were commonly used by the Christians of the sixth century; for instance, they all appear in Ephrem the Syrian’s “Hymns on the Nativity”: Ephraim, “Hymns on the Nativity,” Church Fathers: New Advent, accessed March 10, 2021, https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3703.htm. 4 Mustafa Akyol, The Islamic Jesus: How the King of the
Recommended publications
  • Mary and the Biblical Heritage Lawrence E
    Marian Studies Volume 46 Faith, Mary, Culture Article 7 1995 Mary and the Biblical Heritage Lawrence E. Frizzell Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_studies Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Frizzell, Lawrence E. (1995) "Mary and the Biblical Heritage," Marian Studies: Vol. 46, Article 7. Available at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_studies/vol46/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marian Library Publications at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marian Studies by an authorized editor of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Frizzell: Mary and the Biblical Heritage MARY AND THE BffiUCAL HERITAGE Lawrence E. Frizzell* Throughout the ages, the Church and her teachers have often acknowledged that the fourfold Gospel offers only a limited number of passages that feature the Mother of Jesus. Undaunted, the great doctors of the early Church and the the­ ologians of the Middle Ages found abundant resources for their meditation concerning Mary in the Jewish Scriptures and literature related to the New Testament. The theological premise that God is the principal author of the entire Bible led them to find hints and images of the Messiah everywhere. Recognizing that the link of Jesus to the people of Israel is Mary, his Mother, they rejoiced to find that her coming and her attributes are virtually as ubiquitous as the foreshadow­ ings of Jesus. The lover fmds reminiscences of the beloved everywhere, and these teachers and their communities were intoxicated with love, thirsting to know Jesus and his Mother more deeply.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Lacy Only Monk Mp3, Flac, Wma
    Steve Lacy Only Monk mp3, flac, wma DOWNLOAD LINKS (Clickable) Genre: Jazz Album: Only Monk Country: Italy Released: 1987 Style: Free Jazz, Post Bop MP3 version RAR size: 1405 mb FLAC version RAR size: 1710 mb WMA version RAR size: 1361 mb Rating: 4.4 Votes: 261 Other Formats: DXD XM ADX VOC MP1 APE MP3 Tracklist 1 Evidence 3:42 2 Humph 3:29 3 Eronel 4:38 4 Pannonica 5:48 5 Little Rootie-Tootie 4:23 6 Misterioso 5:49 7 Work 7:16 8 Light Blue 4:18 9 Who Knows? 5:07 Companies, etc. Distributed By – IREC Milano Phonographic Copyright (p) – Soul Note Copyright (c) – Soul Note Published By – IREC Milano Recorded At – Barigozzi Studio Mastered At – PhonoComp Credits Composed By – Thelonious Monk Engineer [Mastering] – Gennaro Carone Engineer [Recording] – Giancarlo Barigozzi Liner Notes – Max Harrison Painting [Front Cover] – Victor Braumer Producer – Giovanni Bonandrini Soprano Saxophone – Steve Lacy Notes Recorded on 29-31 July 1985, at Barigozzi Studio, Milano Mastered at PhonoComp, Tribiano - Milano. Barcode and Other Identifiers Matrix / Runout: SN 1160 MPO 03 @ Rights Society: S.I.A.E. Other versions Category Artist Title (Format) Label Category Country Year SN 1160 Steve Lacy Only Monk (LP, Album) Soul Note SN 1160 Italy 1987 121160-2 Steve Lacy Only Monk (CD, Album) Soul Note 121160-2 Italy 1987 Related Music albums to Only Monk by Steve Lacy Guido Manusardi Trio - Down Town Barigozzi / Rocchi / Milano / Pillot - Quartetto Jazz Steve Lacy / Michael Smith - Sidelines Misha Mengelberg - Steve Lacy - George Lewis - Arjen Gorter - Han Bennink - Change Of Season (Music Of Herbie Nichols) Mal Waldron-Steve Lacy - Sempre Amore Enrico Rava - Electric Five Paul Motian - The Story Of Maryam Craig Harris - Black Bone Max Roach Double Quartet - Live At Vielharmonie Max Roach Quartet - In The Light.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Sin and Justification by Faith1 Churchman 67/4 1953
    Original Sin and Justification by Faith1 Churchman 67/4 1953 Revd D. B. Knox Thomas Becon, Archbishop Cranmer’s chaplain, wrote an allegory about a private dinner party through which he expounded the way of salvation. The first of the four courses which the cook served up consisted of texts from scripture which set out the sinfulness of man’s condition “This is a bitter dish to begin the meal,” a guest complained. “Its bitterness is necessary to be digested,” his host replied, “that you might the better appreciate the delicacy of the dishes that follow. A knowledge of ourselves is necessary to understand God’s grace”. Scripture teaches clearly that all humanity is sinful. No child of Adam avoids sin. (Romans, iii. 23; iii. 10-18; 1 John i. 10). This testimony of scripture is clear; but we should not need the light of scripture to arrive at this elementary truth about human nature, at least in this generation when the marks of human sinfulness are so clearly to be discerned all around us. The question arises, why is sinfulness universal? Pelagius had an answer, viz, the bad example of society into which children are born. There are modern sociologists who give the same reply. Change the environment, isolate the child from the entail of the past, and the sinful propensities will not develop. But experience shows that this is not so. Sinfulness is innate, an integral part of human nature as it now is. The Bible does not speak much of the origin of sinfulness in the individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Saccio
    Great Figures of the New Testament Parts I & II Amy-Jill Levine, Ph.D. PUBLISHED BY: THE TEACHING COMPANY 4840 Westfields Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, Virginia 20151-2299 1-800-TEACH-12 Fax—703-378-3819 www.teach12.com Copyright © The Teaching Company, 2002 Printed in the United States of America This book is in copyright. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of The Teaching Company. Amy-Jill Levine, Ph.D. E. Rhodes and Leona B. Carpenter Professor of New Testament Studies Vanderbilt University Divinity School/ Vanderbilt University Graduate Department of Religion Amy-Jill Levine earned her B.A. with high honors in English and Religion at Smith College, where she graduated magna cum laude and was a member of Phi Beta Kappa. Her M.A. and Ph.D. in Religion are from Duke University, where she was a Gurney Harris Kearns Fellow and W. D. Davies Instructor in Biblical Studies. Before moving to Vanderbilt, she was Sara Lawrence Lightfoot Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Religion at Swarthmore College. Professor Levine’s numerous publications address Second-Temple Judaism, Christian origins, Jewish-Christian relations, and biblical women. She is currently editing the twelve-volume Feminist Companions to the New Testament and Early Christian Literature for Continuum, completing a manuscript on Hellenistic Jewish narratives for Harvard University Press, and preparing a commentary on the Book of Esther for Walter de Gruyter (Berlin).
    [Show full text]
  • I Think I Would Have Been a Nazirite… Parashat Naso June 15, 2019; 12 Sivan 5779 Rabbi Adam J
    I think I would have been a Nazirite… Parashat Naso June 15, 2019; 12 Sivan 5779 Rabbi Adam J. Raskin, Congregation Har Shalom, Potomac, MD Once upon a time, a number of years ago, I shaved my head. I shaved every last lock of hair until I was bald as a cue ball. I know, some of you are thinking, too bad it never grew back! But it did…believe it or not, I used to have bangs. I shaved my head because back in the day I was a varsity swimmer. Our team was headed to the district competition, which was held at a collegiate pool and involved schools all over our region. The winners would qualify for states. As a senior and team captain, in order to get my teammates pumped up for the competition, all the guys shaved their heads. Usually we would wear silicone swim caps to eliminate drag in the water. But for this competition we wanted to feel the cool pool water coursing over our bald heads, and all the psychological supercharge that came along with it. It was a rush and we felt like really serious, committed athletes walking bear-headed down the halls of our high school. I do remember the utter disgust in my mother’s eyes when she first saw me. She said I looked like I was in a concentration camp. She definitely did not approve. In our parasha there is also a wild head-shaving ceremony, though it has nothing to do with athletic performance! At the end of the term of the Nazirite vow, the person who had voluntarily entered into this state of ritual purity by abstaining from grape products, haircuts, and contact with the dead, would appear before the Kohen, the priest with various sacrifices at the Tabernacle.
    [Show full text]
  • Muhammad Speaking of the Messiah: Jesus in the Hadīth Tradition
    MUHAMMAD SPEAKING OF THE MESSIAH: JESUS IN THE HADĪTH TRADITION A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Fatih Harpci (May 2013) Examining Committee Members: Prof. Khalid Y. Blankinship, Advisory Chair, Department of Religion Prof. Vasiliki Limberis, Department of Religion Prof. Terry Rey, Department of Religion Prof. Zameer Hasan, External Member, TU Department of Physics © Copyright 2013 by Fatih Harpci All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Much has been written about Qur’ānic references to Jesus (‘Īsā in Arabic), yet no work has been done on the structure or formal analysis of the numerous references to ‘Īsā in the Hadīth, that is, the collection of writings that report the sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad. In effect, non-Muslims and Muslim scholars neglect the full range of Prophet Muhammad’s statements about Jesus that are in the Hadīth. The dissertation’s main thesis is that an examination of the Hadīths’ reports of Muhammad’s words about and attitudes toward ‘Īsā will lead to fuller understandings about Jesus-‘Īsā among Muslims and propose to non-Muslims new insights into Christian tradition about Jesus. In the latter process, non-Muslims will be encouraged to re-examine past hostile views concerning Muhammad and his words about Jesus. A minor thesis is that Western readers in particular, whether or not they are Christians, will be aided to understand Islamic beliefs about ‘Īsā, prophethood, and eschatology more fully. In the course of the dissertation, Hadīth studies will be enhanced by a full presentation of Muhammad’s words about and attitudes toward Jesus-‘Īsā.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesis of Literature in Islam from the Aural to the Read Gregor Schoeler Revised Edition in Collaboration with and Translated by Shawkat Toorawa
    textbook The Genesis of Literature in Islam From the Aural to the Read Gregor Schoeler Revised edition in collaboration with and translated by Shawkat Toorawa January 2009 Pb ◦ 978 0 7486 2468 3 ◦ £19.99 160pp ◦ 234 x 156 mm Hb ◦ 978 0 7486 2467 6 ◦ £60.00 Asks how knowledge was transmitted in the period of Classical Islam Description The Authors The Qur’an was the first book of Islam and indeed the first book of Arabic Gregor Schoeler is Professor literature. It contains the word of God and the teachings of the Prophet and Chair of Islamic Studies, Muhammad. Muslims wishing to fully understand and interpret this Orientalisches Seminar, material were inspired to make an inventory and study of their tradition. University of Basel. This involved the collection, transmission and instruction of the sacred text, of the words and deeds of Muhammad, and also of poetry. Shawkat Toorawa is Professor of Near Eastern Studies at Cornell This activity, which began towards the end of the seventh century, relied University. predominantly on oral communication between teacher and student. However writing became an integral part of this process, and was the genesis of one of the richest literatures of late antiquity and the middle ages. This is Series clear from the widespread dissemination of scholarship through the writing The New Edinburgh Islamic and proliferation of books. Surveys The Genesis of Literature in Islam explains how this change in the transmission of knowledge - from predominantly oral/aural to written - came about. Readership Islamic Studies • Considers the evolution of the Qur’an as it became an official written document Upper level undergraduates, • Explores the role of the court in the development and transmission of MA students and postgraduates Arabic literature in Islamic and Middle Eastern • Looks at the influences on the transmission of knowledge from Arabic, Studies, Arabic, and Religious Jewish and Hellenic-Christian culture Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • When Does Human Life Begin? Christian Thinking and Contemporary Opposition
    Salt&Light series When does human life begin? Christian thinking and contemporary opposition JOHN R LING Salt&Light series When does human life begin? Christian thinking and contemporary opposition JOHN R LING The substance of this booklet is an extract from The Morning-After Pill – Uncovering the Truth, published by The Christian Institute in 2007: http://www.christian.org.uk/resource/the-morning-after-pill Copyright © The Christian Institute 2017 The author has asserted his right under Section 77 of the Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. First printed in June 2011 Reprinted in May 2015 and August 2017 ISBN 978-1-901086-47-8 Published by The Christian Institute Wilberforce House, 4 Park Road, Gosforth Business Park, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE12 8DG All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, mechanical, electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of The Christian Institute. All scripture quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®. NIV®. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved. The Christian Institute is a Company Limited by Guarantee, registered in England as a charity. Company No. 263 4440, Charity No. 100 4774. A charity registered in Scotland. Charity No. SC039220 Contents 5 1 . Introduction 7 2 . The answer from the Bible 17 3 . The view of the early church 21 4 . The drift from the biblical worldview 25 5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Jonah, the Angry Prophet
    Joel B. Curry, D.Min. P a g e | 1 Jonah, the Angry Prophet Introduction - Word association: Jonah and the _____. - (Whale)—Probably wrong. It was a “great fish” (1:17) Perhaps a whale, but whale is a different word. - And as we know, neither this fish nor Jonah is principal character in the story—God is! He’s the hero! - A little background: - The people of Israel were divided into two kingdoms, Northern (Israel) and Southern (Judah). - Jonah was from a little village near Nazareth, in Galilee; Northern Kingdom. - Around 755-758 B.C. Time of peace and prosperity, conquest and enlargement to original northern border. - Spiritually, a time of poverty, ritualistic and even idolatrous, injustice. Material prosperity was accompanied by lack of spirituality, morality, and ethics. - In those days, God raised prophets to preach His will and call His people back to spiritual commitment. - Jonah’s call was different—not to preach in Israel, but to the people of Nineveh, capital city of Assyria. - Assyria was historical enemy of Israel; known for cruelty in battle and occupation. Just 35 years after Jonah was called to preach in Nineveh, the Assyrians invaded and destroyed the Northern Kingdom. The Israelites they didn’t slaughter, they took captive as slaves. Nineveh was the largest city in the world at that time. - Jonah’s call was different because God told him to go to Nineveh to preach against its wickedness (1:1-2). It is the only case in which God called a prophet to a foreign nation to deliver God’s message against them.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Qur'an
    An Overview of the Qur’ān By Colin D. Smith 2 Introduction Islam is a centuries-old religion, and Muslims have been a part of Western society for nearly as long, and yet despite this, until relatively recently many have not felt the need to understand this religion and its teachings. Now it is evident that an understanding of Islam is vital not only for people to be able to relate to the growing number of Muslims in the West, but also for Christians to be able to effectively reach out both in ministry and in witness to Islam’s adherents. The first thing that needs to be understood is that Islam is not a religion based upon a person. While Mohammad is greatly revered among orthodox Muslims, and while he is considered to be a prophet chosen by Allāh to be an instrument of revelation, his role is simply that of revealer. He is an apostle, a messenger, a mortal man with a special commission. Essentially, Islam is about submission to Allāh and His commands as He has revealed Himself in the Qur’ān, the Islamic scriptures. Islamic law, society, and culture are founded upon the Qur’ān and its principles as elucidated by Mohammad and his followers. If one is, therefore, to gain an understanding of this religion and its adherents, it is vital that one understands the context and message of its scripture. The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with a grasp of the history, structure, and content of the Qur’ān. While the author is coming from a Christian perspective, the intent of this work is not one of Christian apologetic.
    [Show full text]
  • 'David's Women': a Critical Comparison of Michal, Bathsheba and Tamar In
    UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ‘DAVID’S WOMEN’ A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF MICHAL, BATHSHEBA AND TAMAR IN 1 SAMUEL AND 2 SAMUEL. By Julia Michelle Hogan A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Master of Research in Theology and Religion. School of Philosophy and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract In this thesis I shall look at the narratives of three women in 1 and 2 Samuel: Michal, Bathsheba and Tamar. I will argue how these women each endure incredible experiences of suffering that are brought about primarily through the actions of both King David and the narrator. These women suffer at the hands of the narrator due to the narratives neglect in recording their experiences in any detail in the text. Instead, it will be my argument that these women are simply used as a means of continuing and explaining the events that happen in the plot of 1 and 2 Samuel and the ‘David story’. It will be my aim then to attempt to bring these women’s experiences to the forefront of the text and uncover their lost voices.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary in Early Christianity and Islam
    Religious Inquiries Volume 6, Number 11, June 2017, pp. 37-49 Mary in Early Christianity and Islam Morteza Rezazadeh 1 Received: 09-01-2017 / Accepted: 29-06-2017 This article explores the life and importance of Mary in Islam and Christianity, aiming at clarifying the criteria for which Mary has been revered in each tradition. It will be shown that Mary in Christianity is almost merely important because she was the mother of Jesus, while the Muslim reverence for her is based on her own noble characteristics. From the Muslim perspective, even if Mary had not been Jesus’ mother, she would have been a prominent figure and a great example for believers. Keywords: Mary, Jesus, Christian-Muslim dialogue. Introduction As a highly respected figure in both Islamic and Christian traditions, Mary can be a source for reconciliation and can open doors for a more accurate knowledge about her as the mother of Jesus Christ, as well as understanding the position of women in the two traditions. Given the high respect for her in both Islam and Christianity, she 1. PhD Candidate in Comparative Religions and Mysticism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran ([email protected]). 40 / Religious Inquiries can also be a good ground for interfaith dialogue, as well as an important way to fix the place of women in both traditions. The important role of Mary is unknown to many. This paper is a humble effort to investigate the life and importance of Mary in the light of early Christian and Muslim sources. The aim is to clarify the criteria for which Mary has been revered in Islamic and Christian early sources.
    [Show full text]