DOCSLIB.ORG

Salinas River Corridor Trail Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Salinas River Corridor Trail Master Plan Salinas River Trail Northern San Luis Obispo County Salinas River Corridor Anza Trail Conceptual Master Plan - February 2014 Prepared by: In association with: Prepared for: Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Summary 3. Design Standards and Guidelines 1.1 Master Plan Purpose ....................................1-1 3.1 Design Guidelines and Regulations ..........3-1 1.2 Salinas River Trail Background....................1-3 3.2 Transportation Facilities vs Recreational 1.3 Vision, Goals and Objectives .......................1-3 Trails .................................................................3-1 1.4 Public Input ...................................................1-8 3.2.1 Transportation Facilities .................................3-1 1.4.1 Public Workshop #1 .........................................1-8 3.2.2 Recreational Trails and Paths ........................3-3 1.4.2 Public Workshop #2 .........................................1-8 3.2.3 Facility Type Selection .....................................3-3 1.4.3 Public Workshop #3 .........................................1-8 3.3 Federal Standards and Guidelines ............3-3 1.4.4 Public Review Document ..............................1-8 3.3.1 American Association of State Highway and 1.4.5 Stakeholder Interviews ...................................1-8 Transportation Ocials (AASHTO) .............3-3 1.4.6 Online Survey .....................................................1-9 3.3.2 Architectural and Transportation Barrier Com- pliance Board (Access Board) .......................3-5 1.5 Study Area .....................................................1-9 3.3.3 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 3-6 1.6 Master Plan Organization ..........................1-18 3.4 State Standards and Guidelines ................3-7 1.7 Recommendations Summary ...................1-18 3.4.1 California Department of Transportation 1.7.1 Recommended Improvements Summary 1-18 (Caltrans) ..............................................................3-7 1.7.2 Estimated Costs ..............................................1-19 3.4.2 California Department of Parks and Recreation 1.7.3 Summary of Trail Types ................................1-19 (DPR) ......................................................................3-8 1.7.4 Private Property Rights and Trail 3.5 Local Standards and Guidelines ................3-9 Connectivity .................................................... 1-19 3.5.1 County of San Luis Obispo ............................3-9 1.7.5 Next Steps ........................................................ 1-22 3.5.2 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments 2. Setting (SLOCOG) ..........................................................3-12 3.5.3 City Plans .......................................................... 3-12 2.1 Existing Land Use .........................................2-1 3.6 Shared-use Path Design .............................3-16 2.1.1 Destinations .......................................................2-1 3.6.1 Background ..................................................... 3-16 2.2 Public Lands and Access Easements .........2-7 3.6.2 Shared-use Path Access ...............................3-16 2.2.1 Existing Trails and Public Access 3.6.3 User Group Conicts..................................... 3-16 Easements ...........................................................2-7 3.7 Trail Facilities ................................................3-17 2.2.2 Potentially Connecting Trails .....................2-10 3.7.1 Trail and Paved Path Location Criteria ... 3-17 2.3 Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities ...2-17 3.7.2 Bridges ...............................................................3-20 2.4 Environmental Resources ..........................2-17 3.7.3 Boardwalks .......................................................3-22 2.4.1 Agricultural Resources .................................2-17 3.7.4 Drainage Crossing Structures ................... 3-22 2.4.2 Biological Resources .....................................2-18 3.7.5 Staging Areas .................................................. 3-23 2.4.3 Cultural Resources .........................................2-19 3.7.6 Trail Heads ........................................................3-23 2.4.4 Geologic Conditions .....................................2-19 3.7.7 Turn Outs, Vista Points and Rest Areas ...3-23 2.5 Economic Resources ..................................2-20 3.7.8 Shade Structures ............................................3-24 2.5.1 Economic and Demographic Trends ...... 2-20 3.7.9 Restrooms ........................................................ 3-24 2.5.2 Services and Amenities ............................... 2-24 3.7.10 Fencing ..............................................................3-25 2.5.3 Facility Use Levels ..........................................2-25 3.7.11 Plant Materials ................................................ 3-26 2.6 Trail Issue Perceptions and Realities........2-25 2.6.1 Summary of Trail Issues and Solutions .. 2-25 2.6.2 Potential Public Safety Issues and Solutions ...........................................................2-26 2.6.3 Potential Environmental Issues and Solutions ...........................................................2-28 Northern San Luis Obispo County Salinas River Anza Corridor Trail Master Plan 1-1 Table of Contents 3.8 Signage and Trail Branding .......................3-26 5. Action Plan 3.8.1 Site Furnishings ..............................................3-27 5.1 Project Implementation Steps ...................5-1 3.8.2 Fencing and Gates .........................................3-27 5.1.1 Alternative Route Selection ..........................5-1 3.8.3 Lighting .............................................................3-28 5.1.2 Funding - Grant Applications .......................5-1 3.8.4 Paving Patterns ...............................................3-29 5.1.3 Project Agreements -Right-of-Way 3.8.5 Trail Structures ................................................3-30 Acquisition/Permission................................... 5.1 3.8.6 Public Art .......................................................... 3-30 5.1.4 Site Survey - Base Maps and Information 5-4 3.9 Signage and Markings for Trac 5.1.5 Preliminary Design ...........................................5-4 Control and Waynding .............................3-30 5.1.6 Technical Studies ..............................................5-4 3.9.1 Regulatory ........................................................3-31 5.1.7 Environmental Studies and 3.9.2 Waynding .......................................................3-31 Documentation .................................................5-4 3.9.3 Interpretive and Educational .....................3-33 5.1.8 Permits ..................................................................5-4 3.10 Trail Surface Considerations .....................3-33 5.1.9 Construction Documents ..............................5-4 3.10.1 Natural Soft Surface Trails ..........................3-33 5.1.10 Bidding and Contracting ...............................5-4 3.10.2 Firm Natural Surface Trails .........................3-33 5.1.11 Construction .......................................................5.4 3.10.3 Paved Hard Surface Paths ..........................3-34 5.2 SRT Reach Improvements and 3.11 “Non-standard” Bicycle Facilities .............3-37 Implementation Steps ..................................5-4 3.12 Unstable Slopes and Erosive Areas ..........3-41 5.3 Permitting and Approvals ...........................5-4 3.13 Access and Restricted Areas ......................3-41 5.3.1 San Luis Obispo County Permits .................5-4 3.14 Floodway Issues...........................................3-42 5.3.2 Encroachment Permits ...................................5-5 3.15 Designing Trails to Maximize 5.4 Environmental Documentation ..................5-5 User Experience ...........................................3-42 5.4.1 National Environmental Policy Act .............5-5 4. Master Plan Recommendations 5.4.2 California Environmental Quality Act ........5-5 5.4.3 Section 404 Permit - U.S. ACOE ....................5-5 4.1 Master Plan Design Policies and Objectives .. 5.4.4 Section 401 Water Quality Certication - 4-1 Regional Water Quality Control Board ......5-5 4.2 Initial Identication and Ranking of Alterna- 5.4.5 Streambed Alteration Agreement - tive Trails .........................................................4-2 California Department of Fish and 4.3 Selection of Primary Routes ........................4-6 Wildlife ..................................................................5-5 4.4 Reach-by-Reach Descriptions ...................4-10 5.5 Legal Background .......................................5-12 4.5 Trail and Support Facility Types ...............4-11 5.5.1 Public Trust Doctrine ....................................5-12 4.5.1 Trail and Path Types ...................................... 4-11 5.5.2 Statutes Limiting Private Property 4.5.2 Boardwalks .......................................................4-11 Liability ..............................................................5-14 4.5.3 Routes to Close ...............................................4-11 Appendices 4.5.4 Trailheads, Staging and Parking Areas ..4-12 4.5.5 Signs ...................................................................4-12 A. Background Documents 4.5.6 Fences, Gates and Stiles .............................. 4-12 B. Existing Conditions, Opportunities and Con- 4.5.7 Bridges and Drainage Crossings .............
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monterey County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Monterey County Salinas River The Salinas River consists of more than 75 stream miles and drains a watershed of about 4,780 square miles. The river flows northwest from headwaters on the north side of Garcia Mountain to its mouth near the town of Marina. A stone and concrete dam is located about 8.5 miles downstream from the Salinas Dam. It is approximately 14 feet high and is considered a total passage barrier (Hill pers. comm.). The dam forming Santa Margarita Lake is located at stream mile 154 and was constructed in 1941. The Salinas Dam is operated under an agreement requiring that a “live stream” be maintained in the Salinas River from the dam continuously to the confluence of the Salinas and Nacimiento rivers. When a “live stream” cannot be maintained, operators are to release the amount of the reservoir inflow. At times, there is insufficient inflow to ensure a “live stream” to the Nacimiento River (Biskner and Gallagher 1995). In addition, two of the three largest tributaries of the Salinas River have large water storage projects. Releases are made from both the San Antonio and Nacimiento reservoirs that contribute to flows in the Salinas River. Operations are described in an appendix to a 2001 EIR: “ During periods when…natural flow in the Salinas River reaches the north end of the valley, releases are cut back to minimum levels to maximize storage. Minimum releases of 25 cfs are required by agreement with CDFG and flows generally range from 25-25[sic] cfs during the minimum release phase of operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Application to Appropriate Water in Division of Water Rights California") P.O
    TYPE OR PRINT IN BLACK INK California Environmental Protection Agency (For instructions, see booklet: "How to File an State Water Resources Control Board Application to Appropriate Water in Division of Water Rights California") P.O. Box 2000, Sacramento, CA 95812-2000 Tel: (916) 341-5300 Fax: (916) 341-5400 APPLICATION NO www. waterboards. ca.gov/waterrights APPLICATION TO APPROPRIATE WATER 1. APPLICANT/AGENT APPLICANT ASSIGNED AGENT (if any) Name Shandon-San Juan Water District Michael Preszler Mailing Address P.O. Box 150 169 Parkshore Drive, Suite 110 City, State & Zip Shandon, CA 93461 Folsom, CA 95630 Telephone (805) 451-0841 (916) 542-7895 Fax E-mail [email protected] [email protected] 2. OWNERSHIP INFORMATION (Please check type of ownership.) Sole Owner _ Limited Liability Company (LLC) _General Partnership* „ Limited Partnership* Business Trust _ Husband/Wife Co-Ownership _ Corporation Joint Venture x Other California Water District *Please identify the names, addresses and phone numbers of all partners. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Provide a detailed description of your project, including, but not limited to, type of construction activity, area to be graded or excavated, and how the water will be used.) Add additional pages if needed and check box below and label as an attachment. This project is being undertaken by the Shandon-San Juan Water District. The purpose of the project is to augment groundwater supplies in the Paso Robles Area Subbasin (the "Subbasin") by transporting unappropriated water in Lake Nacimiento through the existing Nacimiento Water Project Pipeline (the "Pipeline") to the Subbasin. Water would be delivered to the Subbasin by direct recharge in groundwater recharge facilities that will be constructed, owned and operated by Applicant.
    [Show full text]
  • San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan
    San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan October 2008 Prepared by the Nacitone Watersheds Steering Committee and Central Coast Salmon Enhancement, Inc. Prepared for the Monterey County Water Resources Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the State Water Resources Control Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendations for use. (This page intentionally left blank) 2 Acknowledgements Facilitation of the Nacitone Watersheds Planning Process was managed by Traci Roberts of the Monterey County Farm Bureau. Stephnie Wald of Central Coast Salmon Enhancement prepared the watershed management plan with grateful assistance of Nicole Smith, Elise Torres, and Sarah Paddack. The preparation of the management plan was guided by Steering Committee Co-chairs Duane Wolgomott and Phil Humphrey. Ken Ekelund of the Monterey County Water Resources Agency managed the SWRCB grant that funded the Nacitone Watersheds Management Plan. Each member of the Steering Committee also contributed valuable information and assistance and is acknowledged below. Ann Beckett, Lockwood resident Marilyn Breland, Heritage Ranch resident Bill Capps, Nacimiento Regional Water Management Advisory Committee Terry Chavis, Heritage Ranch resident Ken Ekelund, Program Manager, Monterey County
    [Show full text]
  • Nacimiento Water Project Watershed Sanitary Survey Five Year Update ‐ 2015
    Nacimiento Water Project – San Luis Obispo County Watershed Sanitary Survey Update 2015 Nacimiento Water Project Watershed Sanitary Survey Five Year Update ‐ 2015 Prepared By: San Luis Obispo County Department of Public Works Utilities Department Water Quality Laboratory Nacimiento Water Project – San Luis Obispo County Watershed Sanitary Survey Update 2015 Contents WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY CHECKLIST ............................................................................... i ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... ii 1 SUMMARY of INITIAL WATERSHED SANITARY SURVEY .................................................... 1 1.1 Recommendations from Initial Watershed Sanitary Survey ..................................... 2 1.2 Status of Recommendations ..................................................................................... 0 2 WATERSHED and WATER SUPPLY DELIVERY ..................................................................... 1 2.1 Reservoir Description ................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Watershed Security ................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Project Facilities ........................................................................................................ 2 2.4 Water Delivery Entitlement ...................................................................................... 5 2.5 Inspection
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Strategy Report
    FINAL REPORT CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES WATER & WASTEWATER QUALITY CONCERNS – WATER QUALITY STRATEGY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................ES-1 1.0 SUMMARY OF EXISTING WATER/WASTEWATER QUALITY INFORMATION.............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 EXISTING CITY WASTEWATER INFORMATION....................................... 1-1 1.3 EXISTING CITY WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION.................................... 1-2 1.4 RECYCLEDWATER ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 SURFACEWATER ............................................................................................ 1-2 1.6 SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 1-3 2.0 ANALYSIS OF IMPORTING SURFACE WATER: DRINKING WATER AND WASTEWATER QUALITY BENEFITS/IMPACTS..................................................... 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 POTENTIAL WATER QUALITY IMPACTS OF INTRODUCING SURFACE WATER TO CITY SYSTEMS......................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Pertinent Existing Water Quality Parameters .......................................... 2-1
    [Show full text]
  • 2012, May - San Luis Obispo County Master Water Report, Volume I of III
    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB San Luis Obispo Public Works Water Reports San Luis Obispo Public Works 1-10-2017 2012, May - San Luis Obispo County Master Water Report, Volume I of III Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_cgb_7_a Part of the Business Commons, Education Commons, Engineering Commons, Law Commons, Life Sciences Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation "2012, May - San Luis Obispo County Master Water Report, Volume I of III" (2017). San Luis Obispo Public Works Water Reports. 1. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_cgb_7_a/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the San Luis Obispo Public Works at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in San Luis Obispo Public Works Water Reports by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY MASTER WATER REPORT May 2012 Expires on 3/31/13 Expires on 6/30/12 Expires on 12/31/13 7580 North Ingram Avenue, Suite 112 – Fresno, California 93711 – Phone: 559.436.6616 – Fax: 559.436.1191 pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CA/SLOCFCWCD/8257A00/Deliverables/MWR TOC San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY MASTER WATER REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - MASTER WATER REPORT ES.1 SUMMARY OF REPORT CHAPTERS ..................................................................... 1 ES.2 MASTER WATER REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................... 2 ES.2.1 District’s Highest Priorities ............................................................................ 2 ES.2.2 Water Management Strategies for Specific Users .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Assessment
    DRAFT WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT OLSEN/SOUTH CHANDLER RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN PASO ROBLES August 28, 2019 2490 Mariner Square Loop, Suite 215 Alameda, CA 94501 510.747.6920 www.toddgroundwater.com Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Proposed Project ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Background .................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. WSA Purpose and Organization..................................................................................... 3 2. PROJECT WATER DEMAND ................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Current Water Use ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Estimated Future Water Demand ................................................................................. 6 3. CITY OF PASO ROBLES WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND ........................................................ 9 3.1. City Supply and Demand Overview ............................................................................... 9 3.2. City of Paso Robles Supplies ........................................................................................ 10 3.2.1. Climate ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan
    San Antonio and Nacimiento Rivers Watershed Management Plan October 2008 Prepared by the Nacitone Watersheds Steering Committee and Central Coast Salmon Enhancement, Inc. Prepared for the Monterey County Water Resources Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the State Water Resources Control Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendations for use. (This page intentionally left blank) 2 Acknowledgements Facilitation of the Nacitone Watersheds Planning Process was managed by Traci Roberts of the Monterey County Farm Bureau. Stephnie Wald of Central Coast Salmon Enhancement prepared the watershed management plan with grateful assistance of Nicole Smith, Elise Torres, and Sarah Paddack. The preparation of the management plan was guided by Steering Committee Co-chairs Duane Wolgomott and Phil Humphrey. Ken Ekelund of the Monterey County Water Resources Agency managed the SWRCB grant that funded the Nacitone Watersheds Management Plan. Each member of the Steering Committee also contributed valuable information and assistance and is acknowledged below. Ann Beckett, Lockwood resident Marilyn Breland, Heritage Ranch resident Bill Capps, Nacimiento Regional Water Management Advisory Committee Terry Chavis, Heritage Ranch resident Ken Ekelund, Program Manager, Monterey County
    [Show full text]
  • Interlake Tunnel Powerpoint Presentation
    Interlake Tunnel Project 10/22/14 1 Contents 1. Background – current facilities 2. Project description and function 3. Baseline and tunnel scenario modeling 4. Project benefits / opportunities 5. Project cost estimate 6. Proposed financing plan 7. Comparison of costs with other projects 8. Project development schedule 9. Water rights position 10. Next steps and requirements 2 Existing Surface Water Supply 2 reservoirs, Salinas River, and Salinas River Diversion Facility Description Average SRDF Annual Amounts Salinas River Salinas (AFY) San Antonio Average annual 200,000 controlled release from reservoirs Nacimiento (baseline) Less -40,000 Evapotranspiration & Conveyance losses SRDF deliveries -6,000 Ground water 154,000 recharge Provides flood control, minimum flows, and conservation releases 3 Current Situation at Reservoirs Unused storage Nacimiento Reservoir San Antonio Reservoir • Nacimiento fills 3 x faster than San Antonio • San Antonio has unused storage • Excess water spilled to ocean 4 Tunnel Project Fundamentals 60,000 AF additional storage by raising San Antonio spillway 10’ Increased net storage Nacimiento Reservoir San Antonio Reservoir Increases net storage of reservoirs provides flood control and reduces flood spills 5 Interlake Tunnel Lake San Antonio Monterey County San Luis Obispo County Proposed tunnel alignment • ~ 12,000 feet • 10’ diameter • Concrete lined • Gravity flow tunnel Lake Nacimiento 6 Portals and Tunnel Profile (conceptual) Ground surface Tunnel Nacimiento portal San Antonio portal Portal Elevation (TBD)
    [Show full text]
  • Salinas Valley: Valley-Wide Integrated Groundwater Sustainability Plan Chapters 1-3
    DRAFT DRAFT Salinas Valley: Valley-Wide Integrated Groundwater Sustainability Plan Chapters 1-3 Prepared for: Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency 1-10-19 Draft Release Prepared by: This page left intentionally blank DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................... iv Section 1 Introduction to Salinas Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan .... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Valley-Wide Groundwater Sustainability Plan ............................................ 1 1.2 Description of the Salinas Valley Integrated Groundwater Sustainability Plan area ........ 2 Section 2 Agency Information (§ 354.6) ..................................................................... 4 2.1 Contact information for GSA Plan Managers .......................................................................... 4 Section 3 Description of Plan Area (§ 354.8) ............................................................. 6 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Adjudicated Areas, Other GSAs, and Alternatives ................................................................ 6 3.3 Jurisdictional Areas ..................................................................................................................... 9 3.3.1 Federal Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................... 9 3.3.2
    [Show full text]
  • Plan of Study, Salinas and Carmel Rivers Basin Study
    EXHB Plan of Study Salinas and Carmel Rivers Basin Study January 2017 Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Table of Contents Table of Contents Page Chapter 1 – Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of the Basin Study .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Basins Study Goals and Objectives ............................................................................. 1 1.3 Description of the Basin Study Area ........................................................................... 2 1.3.1 The Salinas River ................................................................................................ 4 1.3.2 The Carmel River ................................................................................................ 8 1.3.3 Monterey Peninsula Watershed .......................................................................... 10 Chapter 2 – Study Description ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Salinas Long-Term Management Plan (LTMP) DRAFT Purpose and Goals Drafted by ICF with Review from Monterey County Water Resources Agency Last Updated: July 25, 2018
    Salinas Long-Term Management Plan (LTMP) DRAFT Purpose and Goals Drafted by ICF with Review from Monterey County Water Resources Agency Last updated: July 25, 2018 Purpose: The purpose of the Salinas River LTMP is to describe a multi-benefit management program that addresses needs related to Monterey County Water Resources Agency (Agency) facilities and operations, as well as related issues such as flood risk reduction, water supply, water quality, natural resource conservation, threatened and endangered species management, and federal and state Endangered Species Act compliance. Goals: Goals 1-5 are based on the Salinas River Management Program grant issued by the California State Coastal Conservancy. Goals are numbered to facilitate discussion, not to suggest any prioritization. 1. Identify long-term solutions for management of the Salinas River that include flood reduction, water resource management, and habitat management for threatened and endangered species. 2. Investigate the Salinas River Lagoon for the potential of reducing flooding on all lands in the vicinity. 3. Identify potential improvements to steelhead migration issues in the Salinas River utilizing existing management efforts and anticipated future projects. 4. Integrate with the Agency’s multi-benefit Salinas River Stream Maintenance Program, including documenting effectiveness. 5. Develop the framework for implementing the LTMP that meets a variety of multi-benefit management goals, including implementation of the forthcoming Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Salinas River Basin. 6. Build upon and incorporate public/private partnerships, compatible with existing land uses and water rights. 7. Establish the historical and existing conditions in the lower Salinas River watershed regarding the physical, biological, and chemical changes in the system over time, and to the extent possible, the sources driving those changes.
    [Show full text]