Lights ON! Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lights ON! Newsletter July 7 th, 2020 Lights ON! Volume 1, Issue 4 Newsletter Mod of Life Association, Antonini no 2 str, Drobeta Turnu Severin, Jud. Mehedinți www.modoflife.ro, [email protected] INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Getting started Galbenu Răzvan, President, Mod of Life Association 1. Briefly, what we have done in the past few months We do not only intend to increase the number of tourists in region, the problem is to maintain the percentage of tourists 2. Territory of the cross- we had last year, but also to increase the quality of services border area and visits into the destination. That is why, together with the two project partners, UAT Drobeta Turnu Severin and the Tourism Organization of Kladovo Municipality, we decided to implement „Lights ON!” project. It will define the quality of 3. Accessibility of the cross- the tourism product in the cross-border area of the two border region counties - Mehedinți and Borski, starting with the accommodation area and ending with the transport and tour 4. Situation of the tourism guide area, interspersed with gastronomy and traditional sector products. All these elements will define the quality of the destination as a whole, says the president of the Mod of Life Association, Galbenu Răzvan. 5. Analysis of the external and internal environment We will build and strengthen the tourism product and will go of tourist areas border out with it on the national and international market, to bring added value, both in the area of local communities and in the development and promotion of tourism at a general level. The activities that will be carried out in this project will involve to 6. Recommendations for a large extent the members of the two communities from valuing the common tourist Drobeta Turnu Severin and Kladovo, as well as the decision- potential makers from the Mehedinți and Borski cross-border area. Briefly, what we have done in the past few months… April 2020 unfortunately started with a situation that we did not take into account when we discussed the activities that were to take place between 01-30.04. 2020. Our Serbian partners have asked us to suspend the project’s activities for a period of two months due to the outbreak of COVID-19 in Serbia. Since receiving the official paper from the members of the project team of the Tourist Organization of Kladova Municipality, I got in touch with the project team of Drobeta Turnu Severin City Hall. Following the discussions, they understood the unforeseen situation that arose and decided to start the project suspension procedure, so following the agreement of all those involved in the project, by address number 30 dated 14.04.2020, I requested from BRCT Timisoara the suspension of the project for a period of 2 months, until the situation in Serbia is clarified. In May, on 25.05.2020, the 3rd partner, respectively the Tourist Organization of Kladova, received other sad news. Following decision no. 76622, I was informed that due to the fact that they did not make the planned expenses in due time, the Serbian partner's budget was reduced by 10%. Towards the end of May, on 20.05.2020, through the address no. 23-53 / 2020, the third partner, TOOK, asked us to start the procedure for the resumption of the project in July. I talked to the project team from Drobeta Turnu Severin City Hall, to those from BRCT Timisoara and on 25.05.2020 following the address no. 41 I requested the Regional Office for Cross-Border Cooperation Romania-Serbia to resume the project. Also in May, at the official address of the Mod of Life Association, the leading partner of the project, came a series of clarifications related to the third financial reporting period according to the address no. 214/27.05.2020, asking for the balance and other financial details of the project in both Euro and RON. June began with a series of discussions with the partners involved in the project about the stage in which they are with the activities provided in the project, about the situation of equipment tenders, with the requests they have regarding addendum no. 2 requested by Drobeta Turnu Severin City Hall . Also at the beginning of the month, we completed the requests received in the Clarification Request R.2.1-RORS 248 / 02.06.2020. The clarifications mainly concerned changes related to the situation of some deliverables that were wrongly selected in E-Ms, as well as related to the retransmission of the Tourism Marketing Study, because the file uploaded on the platform could not be viewed. 2 | Page The study of tourist marketing, The development of tourist attractions that capitalize on the historical and cultural potential in the cross-border region Romania-Serbia aimed, among others, the following aspects: TERRITORY OF THE CROSS-BORDER AREA The territory covered by the project consists of two counties from two neighboring countries: Mehedinti County in Romania and Bor County in Serbia. In Romania, Mehedinți County is located in the southern part, while in Serbia, Bor County is located in the eastern part. The main cities in this area are Drobeta Turnu Severin, in Romania, and Bor and Negotin in Serbia. The description of the cross-border area: MEHEDINŢI The Danube River together with the Carpathian Mountains form the well-known area of the Danube Gorge - The Iron Gates. In addition to the mountainous areas, this cross-border region has a flat surface in the western part of the region - the Timok Valley and the Mehedinţi plateau. Mehedinti County is located in the southwestern part of Romania, on the left bank of the Danube at its exit from the gorge. It has an area of 493289 hectares (2.1% of the country's surface) and borders the counties: Caraş-Severin to the west, Gorj to the north and Dolj to the southeast. To the south it borders Bulgaria and Serbia. From the point of view of the administrative organization, the county includes 2 municipalities (Drobeta-Turnu Severin and Orşova), 3 cities (Baia de Aramă, Strehaia and Vânju Mare), 61 communes and 344 villages. Population by domicile of Mehedinţi county was 280888 inhabitants as of July 1 2017. The county is crossed by the European road E70, and the commissioning of the Rhine - Main - Danube Canal put the county seat, Drobeta Turnu Severin, in direct contact with all the riparian cities from the Black Sea to the North Sea. The bridge at the Iron Gates Hydropower and Navigation System shortened the road distances between Drobeta-Turnu Severin and various European cities. The relief of the county formed by mountains, plateaus and plain, appears in the form of an amphitheater arranged in steps that descend from north-northwest to south- southeast. The highest step, in the northwest, is made up of the Mehedinţi and Cerna mountains, the middle step includes the Mehedinţi plateau, the Motru hills and the high plain of Bălăciţa, the lowest step, the Blahniţa Plain is made up mostly of the Danube’s terraces, Drincea’s and Blahniţa’s valleys. The presence of depressions such as Baia de Aramă, Comăneşti - Halânga, wide valleys and the sub-Carpathian depression of Topolniţa offers living and traffic conditions, including the high areas of the county. The climate of Mehedinţi County is temperate-continental with Mediterranean influences in the area of the Danube Boilers and of Drobeta Turnu Severin municipality. The most important watercourse is the Danube river, which represents the natural border of the county on a length of 192 km. The rivers Cerna, Bahna, Topolniţa, Blahniţa and Drincea flow into the Danube on the territory of Mehedinţi County. In the northeastern part of the county, the Motru river basin stretches with the Coşuştea and Huşniţa tributaries. (INS - MEHEDINȚI County Directorate of Statistics, without year) The most important resources of the subsoil are: coal, asbestos, bentonite, limestone, slate, sand and sulfurous waters. The variety of relief ensures a balanced structure of the use of the county’s surface. Advantaged by its geographical position and its opening to the Danube, Mehedinţi County has known since ancient times a rich activity of trade, shipping, especially freight. Road transport has a network of 1856 km, of which 374 km are part of national and European roads. The post office and telecommunications began in 1862 and have grown in recent years. The commercial and public services have known an important development, meant to satisfy the growing demands of the population. From an economic point of view there are important production capacities in the field of shipbuilding, wagons, wood processing, inorganic products manufacturing, wood furniture manufacturing, celulosis and paper, textiles, food industry, coal mining and electricity generation facilities (hydro and thermo). 4 | Page BOR Bor County covers an area of 3507 km2. It includes the municipalities of Bor, Negotin, Majdanpek and Kladovo. Bor County covers 3.96% of the entire territory of Serbia. The border between Serbia and Romania, in this part of the country, runs exclusively on energy generateb by the Danube River. Geographically, it includes a larger part of the Timok Basin, part of lower Transdanubia and the hill-mountain area, springs and the upper part of Pek River. Several geomorphological mountain units and hilly lands are neighboring or have the territory within the county. These areas represent the Kucaj, Deli Jovan, Stol, Mali Krs, Veliki Krs mountains, the Danube river valley, Veliki Timok (Great Timok) and the Pek River. The county is rich in biodiversity, hosting the largest national park in Serbia - Djerdap National Park. It is home to many animals, such as the otter, the European rabbit, the roe deer, the wolf, the mountain goat and more.
Recommended publications
  • Wetlands on Danube Delta Bioisphere Reserve
    Wetland conservation and sustainable use in Romania Dr. Grigore Baboianu, Executive director, Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Romania 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 “Wetlands: home and destination” Romania Total surface: 238,391 km2 Inhabitants: 19,042,936 (2011) Etnic Groups: Romanian 89%, Hungarian 7.5%, Gipsy 1.9%, German & others 1.6% Position: Central South-Eastern 450 N Latitude 250 E Longitude Climate: Temperate (8 -110 C) Rainfall: 400-600 l/y 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Relief: Mountains (35%) - Carpathian, 910 km - Dobrogea Hills (35%) Plains (30%) Black Sea (245 km) Danube Delta (3,510 km2) 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Wetlands in Romania In Romania there were inventoried: Lakes: 3,450 (2,650 km2 - 1,1%): mountain (glacial, carst, vulcanoes), floodplain, reservoirs, marine and coastal lagoons and lakes of Danube Delta. Rivers: 120,000 km: (Danube River (1,075 km), 28 rivers >162 km (8,096 km)) Swamps: 215 (52 km2) Map of wetlands distribution in Romania 11TH Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Main use/role of wetlands: Flood Control Groundwater Replenishment Shoreline Stabilisation & Storm Protection Sediment & Nutrient Retention and Export Climate Change Mitigation Water Purification Reservoirs
    [Show full text]
  • Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive
    Continuing previous meetings: Forum Carpaticum 2010 (Krakow, Poland), Forum Carpaticum 2012 (Stará Lesná, Slovakia), Forum Carpaticum 2014 (Lviv, Ukraine), Forum Carpaticum 2016 (Bucharest, Romania) addresses the need to make a bridge of smart sustainable development in the Carpathians with scientists, stakeholders, institutions, NGOs, communities. The Carpathian Region – the Green Backbone of Europe – faces many opportunities as well as challenges to the future development of the area. The stakeholders, decision makers and research communities can use them wisely for the enhanced protection and sustainable development of the Carpathians. These overall goals meet well with the EU 2020 Cohesion Policy, which proposes “Smart”, “Sustainable” and “Inclusive” to be the keywords when addressing the main priorities for the near future. Forum Carpaticum 2016 „Future of the Carpathians: Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive“ proposes to concentrate on these priorities and to debate how they can be implemented in the Carpathian Region, during the following main thematic sessions: Smart Carpathians session aims to present and discuss the leading edge achievements in: recent and future information and communication technologies; emerging paradigms and methodological developments; front-rank research infrastructures, capacities and innovations; open knowledge, information and data systems applications, in particular those of Carpathian interest. Sustainable Carpathians is expected to cover the topics that consider: climate change adaptation, risk prevention
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Public Perception on Protected Areas in Iron Gates Natural Park
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Environmental Sciences 32 ( 2016 ) 70 – 79 International Conference – Environment at a Crossroads: SMART approaches for a sustainable future Assessing public perception on protected areas in Iron Gates Natural Park Cristiana Maria Ciocăneaa*, Carmen Sorescub, Mirela Ianoșib, Vasile Bagrinovschia aUniversity of Bucharest, Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, N. Bălcescu, no.1, Sector 1, Bucharest, 010041, Romania b Environmental Protection Agency Caras-Severin, Petru Maior, no.73, Resita, 320111, Romania Abstract Iron Gates Natural Park, situated in the south-western part of Romania is protected for its remarkable landscape, high biological diversity and unique habitats. The paper assesse the public perception on protected areas in Iron Gates Natural Park and explore perceptions of local residents and local authorities’ attitudes towards protected areas and conservation activities. Most respondents held a positive attitude towards protected areas and the analysis of their attitudes and perceptions revealed potential conflicts that might affect biodiversity conservation and protected area management. The main problems are the limited knowledge and a poor communication with authorities which implies a lack of local participation in conservation activities. Based on our studies, some recommendations are given for improvement of Iron Gates Natural Park management due to the importance of the local community involvement in conservation activities. ©© 2016 2016 The The Authors. Authors. Published Published by Elsevierby Elsevier B.V ThisB.V. is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (Peerhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-review under responsibility of the organizing). committee of ECOSMART 2015. Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of ECOSMART 2015 Keywords: protected area; protected area management; public perception; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background of the Trust
    Transylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 16 ‒ special issue (2014), The “Iron Gates” Natural Park 211 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DYNAMIC OF RURAL AND URBAN LANDSCAPES IDENTIFIED IN THE “IRON GATES” NATURAL PARK Mihăiţă-Iulian NICULAE *, Mihai Răzvan NIŢĂ *, Gabriel VANĂU *, Cristiana CIOCANEA * and Athanasios GAVRILIDIS * * University of Bucharest, Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, Nicolae Bălcescu Boulevard 1, Sector 1, CP 010041, Bucharest, Romania, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] DOI: 10.1515/trser-2015-0043 KEYWORDS: Rural and urban landscape, land use, land cover, landscape change, “Iron Gates” Natural Park, Romania. ABSTRACT In the present paper, we identified landscape typologies in the “Iron Gates” Natural Park from Romania and assessed their dynamic starting with 1990 to 2006. We evaluated the dynamic of landscapes based on land use and land covers changes as extracted from the Corine Land Cover databases. We found no major modifications in the distribution of landscapes, only 4.4% of the study area recording changes. Forestry landscapes have the highest ratio of change (on 1.5% from the total surface of the park), with significant decreases also recorded in landscapes of shrub and rare vegetation, as well as mixed agricultural landscapes. Among the active transformation processes, forestation (on 45% of the modified surface) and agricultural activities (20%) recorded the highest distribution. RÉSUMÉ: La dynamique spatiale et temporelle des paysages ruraux et urbains dans le Parc Naturel des “Portes de Fer”. L’article fait un inventaire des catégories de paysages qui se trouvent dans le Parc Naturel des “Portes de Fer” des Roumanie et analyse la dynamique de ces paysages de 1990 à 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Surface Water Quality in Djerdap/Iron Gate Protected Area
    STUDY ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN DJERDAP/IRON GATE PROTECTED AREA Francisc Popescu, Milan Trumić, Ioan Laza, Bogdana Vujić, Virgil Stoica, Maja Trumić, Nada Štrbać, Ion Dragos Uţu, Milan Antonijević, Dorin Lelea, Carmen Rădescu, Snežana Đoševska The study is a result of “Academic Environmental Protection Studies on surface water quality in significant cross-border nature reservations Djerdap / Iron Gate national park and Carska Bara special nature reserve, with population awareness raising workshops”, financed thru the Interreg – IPA CBC Romania – Serbia Programme 2014 - 2020 Project acronym: AEPS Project eMS code: RORS-462 Project webpage: http://aeps.upt.ro TIMIŞOARA, 2021 ISBN 978-973-0-33702-0 Contents Acknowledgment .................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Danube. National Park Djerdap ....................................................................................................... 3 2. Danube. Iron Gates Natural Park .................................................................................................... 7 3. Danube’s main tributaries in National Park Djerdap – Iron Gate Natural park area .................... 14 3.1. Nera River .............................................................................................................................. 14 3.2. Berzasca River ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.3. Porecka River
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background of the Trust
    Transylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 21.2 (2019), "The Wetlands Diversity" 49 MORPHOLOGY OF THE GENUS GYMNOCEPHALUS (PISCES) FROM THE LOWER DANUBE RIVER Cecilia ȘERBAN * and Gabriela GRIGORAŞ ** * “Dunărea de Jos” University, Domnească Street 111, RO-800201 Galați, Romania, [email protected] ** “Răsvan Angheluță” Museum Complex of Natural Sciences, Regiment 11 Siret Street, 6A, RO-800340 Galaţi, Romania, [email protected] DOI: 10.2478/trser-2019-0012 KEYWORDS: genus Gymnocephalus, phenotypic variability, morphometric, geometrics, lower Danube. ABSTRACT The current study completed the information regarding the phenotypic variability in the Danube ruffe (Gymnocephalus baloni). We also assessed the phylogenetic relationship of G. baloni with the other two species of the genus Gymnocephalus from the Lower Danube River. Ten morphological characters were the most useful together for discriminating between G. baloni and G. cernua from the Lower Danube River. In addition, we found a more streamlined body shape in G. baloni compared with the described holotype, which could be in connection with fish phenotypic response to ecological characteristics of the Lower Danube River. RESUMÉ: Morphologie du genre Gymnocephalus (Pisces) du cours inférieur du Danube. L’étude actuelle a complété l’information concernant la variabilité phénotypique de la ruffe du Danube (Gymnocephalus baloni). On a également évalué la relation phylogénétique de G. baloni avec les deux autres espèces du genre Gymnocephalus du cours inférieur du Danube. Dix caractères morphologiques ont été les plus utiles pour différencier G. baloni et G. cernua du cours inférieur du Danube. De même, on a trouvé une forme de corps plus hydrodynamique chez G. baloni par rapport à l’holotype décrit, ce qui pourrait être en rapport avec la réponse phénotypique des poissons aux caractéristiques écologiques du cours inférieur du Danube.
    [Show full text]
  • Network for Sustainable Mobility Along the Danube SRTMP of IRON
    Transdanube.Pearls - Network for Sustainable Mobility along the Danube SRTMP of IRON GATES REGION - RO http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls WP4/Action 4.2 Trifanescu Rodica,Tudorache Doru, Radulescu Adrian v02/15.07.2018 SRTMP of IRON GATES REGION - RO Document Revision/Approval Version Date Status Date Status 01 15.07.2018 draft Contacts Coordinator: ERDF PP11 National Institute for Research and Development in Tourism Legal representative: Victor Timotin, PhD Email Address: [email protected] Web: www.incdt.ro Revision: (if applicable) More information about TRANSDANUBE.PEARLS and the project activities &results are available on: http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube- pearls 1 SRTMP of IRON GATES REGION - RO Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Structural data of the Pearl ........................................................................................................... 6 a. Transport infrastructure ................................................................................................................. 8 b. Tourism .......................................................................................................................................... 12 2. SWOT-analysis of the Iron Gates Pearl – RO ........................................................................ 18 3. Key stakeholders in the Pearl ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Wetlands: Exploring Formal Mechanisms for Cooperation
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Zoe Rosenblum for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resources Policy and Management presented on December 15, 2020. Title: Transboundary Wetlands: Exploring Formal Mechanisms for Cooperation Abstract approved: ____________________________________________________ Susanne Schmeier Despite increased understanding of the benefits of wetlands, global wetland area continues to decrease. Wetlands are being lost at an alarming rate, and with them, biodiversity, floodwater storage, water purification, and countless other functions. There is little information available about mechanisms to manage transboundary wetlands. While the Ramsar Convention is one international mechanism for wetland governance, there are very few cases in which all riparian parties have jointly designated a Transboundary Ramsar Site. Most research on transboundary wetlands explores specific conflicts or management issues or argues for or against the Ramsar Convention as a legal tool to manage wetlands. However, little research explores institutions for managing transboundary wetlands. Furthermore, while there is much evidence that freshwater resources are a source of cooperation, there is emphasis on rivers and wetlands are largely absent from the discourse. This research employs document analysis, coding, and spatial analysis to explore how transboundary wetlands are managed. The products of this research are: a database of the world’s transboundary wetlands; an in-depth analysis of the management of the Wadden Sea, Okavango Delta, and
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Landscape Fragmentation and Classifying Threats for Habitats of Community Interest in the “Iron Gates” Natural Park (Romania)
    Transylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 16 ‒ special issue (2014), The “Iron Gates” Natural Park 197 ANALYSING LANDSCAPE FRAGMENTATION AND CLASSIFYING THREATS FOR HABITATS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST IN THE “IRON GATES” NATURAL PARK (ROMANIA) Mihăiţă-Iulian NICULAE *, Mihai Răzvan NIŢĂ * and Gabriel VANĂU * * University of Bucharest, Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies, Nicolae Bălcescu Boulevard 1, Sector 1, CP 010041, Bucharest, Romania, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] DOI: 10.1515/trser-2015-0042 KEYWORDS: Landscape fragmentation, landscape metrics, ecological impact, habitats of community interest, “Iron Gates” Natural Park, Romania. ABSTRACT Our study aims at evaluating the ecological impact of landscape fragmentation, identifying, and classifying the threats affecting habitats of community interest in the “Iron Gates” Natural Park. We used landscape metrics for assessing the fragmentation process, results expressing decreases in the values of three metrics (MPS, ED, SDI) and increases for two metrics (NumP and IJI). We observed an insignificant increase in landscape fragmentation related to a reduced decrease of its landscape diversity for the 1990-2006 timeframe. We classified the main anthropic threats to habitats of community interest in three main categories: diversification and densification of buildings and transportation infrastructures, land use and industrial activities. RÉSUMÉ: Analyse de la fragmentation du paysage et classification des menaces pour les habitats d’intérêts communautaires dans le Parc Naturel des “Portes de Fer” (Roumanie). L’étude réalise une évaluation de l’impact écologique des activités humaines sur les habitats et les espèces d’importance communautaire dans le Parc National “Portes de Fer”.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania's Voluntary National Review 2018 2018
    ROMANIA’S VOLUNTARY NATIONAL REVIEW 2018 2018 2 12 Libertatii Blvd, 040129, District 5, Bucharest Romania Email: [email protected] www.mmediu.ro Cover photo: “Weather Snake” – Derna, Bihor County, Romania (2017-2018) Photo credit: Ovi D. Pop 3 FOREWORD BY THE PRIME MINISTER / 4 STATEMENT BY THE VICE PRIME MINISTER, MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENT / 5 INTRODUCTION / 6 POLICY AND ENABLING ENVIRONMENT / 7 LEAVE NO ONE BEHIND /10 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 6 Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all/ 34 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 7 Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all/ 41 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 11 Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable/ 54 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 12 Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns/ 65 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 15 Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss / 70 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOAL 17 Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development / 84 FOLLOW-UP / 89 List of Figures / 90 List of Terms / 92 4 FOREWORD BY THE PRIME MINISTER OF THE GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA VASILICA - VIORICA DĂNCILĂ Romania has been working at internalizing the core principles of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, as soon as it is committed to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals and their targets. The guidelines outlined in the 2030 Agenda provided the highlights that enabled us to analyze, plan and create our national road-map for sustainable development. The aim of the present Voluntary National Review is to provide information on the Romanian preparation process and the strategies for implementation of the 2030 Agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Gates Nature Park and Djerdap National Park
    Landscape monitoring in two transboundary parks from Romania and Serbia: Iron Gates Nature Park and Djerdap National Park. Contact name Amalia Dumbravă Institution name Romania National Forest Administration Romsilva – Iron Gates Natural Park Administration Region & country Banat region - Romania Summary The Iron Gates Nature Park administration implements a monitoring strategy developed in a European project. This activity started in 2015 and the monitoring protocol is applied every three months. The methodology assumes to select a point, take photos from all the four geographical points and to complete a fact-sheets of the landscape. Danube Gorge Photo by: Iron Gates Natural Park Administration Background of the project Before implementing this strategy, we did not know what kind of landscapes we have, on which ecological category they are included or what kind of the management measures we have to take. Being a nature park, with many localities and with a high diversity of flora and fauna, geology and geomorphology, it was very important for us to have the possibility to evaluate the landscapes. We needed to see what kind of landscapes we have, in which condition they were and which ecological category they belonged to. Solution and actions taken Iron Gate Nature Park became a partner in a transnational project (BioREGIOCarpathians project). In this project, the methodology was developed as a common management measure of the two neighboring parks in Romania and Serbia: Iron Gates Nature Park and Djerdap National Park. One of the activities was to have a common methodology regarding the landscapes. After that, we have started to implement the methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Institutional Stakeholders' Views On
    Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, May 2012, Vol. 7, No. 2, p. 219 - 230 A STUDY OF INSTITUTIONAL STAKEHOLDERS’ VIEWS ON BIODIVERSITY IN ROMANIA Amelia ROTAR1,2,*, Laurent SIMON1, Petru URDEA2 & Mircea VOICULESCU2 1Pantheon - Sorbonne University, Department of Geography, 191, Rue Saint Jacques, 75005 Paris, France 2University of the West, Department of Geography, Bvd. Vasile Pârvan, nr. 4, Timişoara, Romania * Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: This paper inquires into the questions related to endangered habitats and species, as well as that of factors threatening biodiversity, in Romania, by analysing existing opinions of biodiversity institutional stakeholders. The research applies a combination of qualitative social science (participatory) approaches and quantitative tools as a means for understanding biodiversity related issues in Romania. Heterogeneity of opinions of biodiversity institutional stakeholders, concerning endangered biodiversity and its threats, are analysed. Stakeholders' perspectives are identified through characterization of opinion groups and discursive analysis. Key factors influencing the attitudinal diversity are examined. Research outputs reveal the diversity of existing stakeholders’ views. Keywords: biodiversity, stakeholders, Romania, Central Europe, endangered habitats, endangered species, threatened habitats, threatened species 1. INTRODUCTION integration of conservation science and policymaking is hindered by the lack of data on Some of the major causes of biodiversity biodiversity. One potential way of approaching this decrease in Europe are habitat degradation, issue is to identify the endangered habitats and fragmentation and loss (Parmesan et al., 1999; species, as well as the threats to biodiversity, as Wettstein & Schmid, 1999; Abbitt et al., 2000; emerging from the biodiversity stakeholders’ Tscharntke et al., 2002; Fahrig, 2003; Henle et al., perspectives.
    [Show full text]