Baking Cakes for the Queen of Heaven: Jeremiah 7 in Context Part 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Baking Cakes for the Queen of Heaven: Jeremiah 7 in Context Part 2 WWIE? (What Would Ishtar Eat?) Baking Cakes for the Queen of Heaven: Jeremiah 7 in Context Part 2 So, this is not what I was studying. I was looking into Molech worship from the vantage point of Emperor Cult and cult prostitution in the light of this week’s Torah Portion – and then I stumbled upon this by accident. And it was way too cool not to dig into, explore and share. “Oh Istar, merciful goddess, I have come to visit you. I have prepared for you an offering, pure milk, a pure cake baked in ashes (kamanu tumri), I stood up for you a vessel for libations, hear me and act favorably towards me.” – A hymn of Ishtar (there have been many different hymns preserved), quoted in Ackerman What is Kamanu tumri? It is a thin unleavened loaf of fine flour baked in ashes – literally called an “ash cake” (as opposed to bread made in a formal oven, tumru bread is made on the go, in haste). In fact it is still made by Arabs to this day. (1) What is a pure cake? I believe that calling it a “pure cake” would probably be a reflection of the fact that it hasn’t had time to become leavened. Not immediately a game changer until you look at Jeremiah 7:18 The children gather wood, the fathers kindle fire, and the women knead dough, to make cakes (kawwanim) for the queen of heaven. And they pour out drink offerings to other gods, to provoke me to anger. (2) Kawwanim is a loan word derived from the Akkadian kamanu (3) and the only other place we see it in scripture is Jer 44:19 And the women said, “Indeed we will go on making offerings to the queen of heaven and pouring out libations to her; do you think that we made cakes for her, marked with her image, and poured out libations to her without our husbands’ being involved?” (4) In context, Jeremiah 44 concerns the return of the Jews to the worship of the Queen of Heaven as they feel they had been cursed since abandoning her. Going back to the first quotation from the Hymn of Ishtar, the entire reason the hymnist was offering milk, cakes and wine was in order to be heard and blessed. Look at that unique phrase in Jer 44:19 – marked with her image – l’ha’asibah. The only other place we see this in scripture is when Job is speaking of being fashioned by God’s own hands in Job 10:8. So we have unleavened, thin, fine flour cakes either fashioned in the image of Ishtar or bearing her mark. Her “mark” or fashioned shape, as we know from the plentiful archaeological finds (including her entire Temple excavated in Ninevah and a great many tablets giving us an incredible wealth of knowledge about her cult – heck, we even know that her priests were cross-dressers!), would have been one of four possible things – the eight pointed star, the lion, the owl, or perhaps they were fashioned in the shape of her body in some way as she was a unique sort of fertility goddess without being a mother goddess (goddess of the storehouse and of prostitutes, go figure – kinda like having a day job and a night job). So what would Ishtar eat? Thin, fine flour, unleavened cakes fashioned or stamped with her sign – paired with a nice glass of Chianti. (well okay, probably not Chianti) Does this mean that unleavened bread is somehow pagan? Or wine poured out on the altar? Of course not – no more so than the meat, leavened bread, honey, salt, milk and other foods. Unleavened bread is simply bread made without waiting for the leavening process, which in ancient times was a long and complicated process. In the end, a pagan offering requires a pagan target and pagan intent. Form and function working together for the specific purpose of drawing near to another deity. Nothing offered to pagan gods was, in and of itself, pagan – but shaping or stamping a flat unleavened cake with the image of Ishtar and then purposefuly offering it up to her? Yeah that’s pagan. Context and intent change everything – and they especially change how we read and interpret the Bible. (1) Barrows, E. P., The Manners and Customs of the Jews: pg 99; also Luzac’s Semitic Texts and Translation Series, Vol. 15, The Devils and Evil Spirits in Babylonia, p 19 (2) The Holy Bible: English Standard Version. (2001). (Je 7:18). Wheaton: Standard Bible Society. (3) Ackerman, Susan, “And the Women Knead Dough: The Worship of the Queen of Heaven in Sixth Century Judah” in Bach, Alice, Women in the Hebrew Bible (1999) pp 21-32 (4) The Holy Bible: New Revised Standard Version. (1989). (Je 44:19). Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers. .
Recommended publications
  • Jeremiah Commentary
    YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE JEREMIAH BOB UTLEY PROFESSOR OF HERMENEUTICS (BIBLE INTERPRETATION) STUDY GUIDE COMMENTARY SERIES OLD TESTAMENT, VOL. 13A BIBLE LESSONS INTERNATIONAL MARSHALL, TEXAS 2012 www.BibleLessonsIntl.com www.freebiblecommentary.org Copyright ©2001 by Bible Lessons International, Marshall, Texas (Revised 2006, 2012) All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any way or by any means without the written permission of the publisher. Bible Lessons International P. O. Box 1289 Marshall, TX 75671-1289 1-800-785-1005 ISBN 978-1-892691-45-3 The primary biblical text used in this commentary is: New American Standard Bible (Update, 1995) Copyright ©1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation P. O. Box 2279 La Habra, CA 90632-2279 The paragraph divisions and summary captions as well as selected phrases are from: 1. The New King James Version, Copyright ©1979, 1980, 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 2. The New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, Copyright ©1989 by the Division of Christian Education of National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U. S. A. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 3. Today’s English Version is used by permission of the copyright owner, The American Bible Society, ©1966, 1971. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 4. The New Jerusalem Bible, copyright ©1990 by Darton, Longman & Todd, Ltd. and Doubleday, a division of Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.freebiblecommentary.org The New American Standard Bible Update — 1995 Easier to read: } Passages with Old English “thee’s” and “thou’s” etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Parallelism and the "Jehoiakim Frame": a Reading Strategy for Jeremiah 26-45
    Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 6-2005 Narrative Parallelism and the "Jehoiakim Frame": a Reading Strategy for Jeremiah 26-45 Gary E. Yates Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Yates, Gary E., "Narrative Parallelism and the "Jehoiakim Frame": a Reading Strategy for Jeremiah 26-45" (2005). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 5. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JETS 48/2 (June 2005) 263-81 NARRATIVE PARALLELISM AND THE "JEHOIAKIM FRAME": A READING STRATEGY FOR JEREMIAH 26-45 GARY E. YATES* I. INTRODUCTION Many attempting to make sense of prophetic literature in the Hebrew Bible would echo Carroll's assessment that "[t]o the modern reader the books of Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel are virtually incomprehensible as books."1 For Carroll, the problem with reading these books as "books" is that there is a confusing mixture of prose and poetry, a lack of coherent order and arrange­ ment, and a shortage of necessary contextual information needed for accu­ rate interpretation.2 Despite the difficult compositional and historical issues associated with the book of Jeremiah, there is a growing consensus that
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Learner Story Collectionsuploaded
    A story may speak more strongly than a sermon about God’s view on cultural issues. Look at the following list of stories which illustrate the concept of matching a story to a Biblical, cultural or worldview issue: God’s Promise to Abraham Genesis 12:1-9, Gen. 17:1-8 (Illustrates the concept of God’s relationship with man. God is not distant and unknowable.) The Ten Commandments Exodus 19:16-20:17 ( Illustrates that God is Holy) Saul at Endor I Samuel 28 (Illustrates the evil of witchcraft and consulting mediums and God’s view of these things) Abraham is Tested Genesis 22:1-19 (Illustrates Blood sacrifice) Elijah is fed by the Ravens I Kings 17:1-6 (Illustrates that God is our Provider) Solomon’s Dream I Kings 3:1-15 (Illustrates the significance of dreams) The Book of the Law is Found 2 Kings 22 and 23 ( Illustrates idolatry and God’s view of idols made my man) Naaman Healed of Leprosy 2 Kings 4 (Illustrates Healing and the Power of God) The Golden Calf Exodus 32 (Illustrates Idolatry and God’s Hatred of Idolatry) The Lost Son (Illustrates Forgiveness) Story of Lazarus John 11:1-43 (Illustrates the Power of God) Paul in Athens Acts 17:16-34 (Illustrates the religious nature of certain cultures) Bricks without Straw Exodus 5:-6:18 (Illustrates oppression and social caste, God’s view of equality) Peter’s Vision on Food Acts 11:1-18 (Illustrates God’s view on Food Taboos) See the Lesson Plan for ideas on how to assist your audience to understand these concepts with an Activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Year 1, Proper 24, Monday: Morning Prayer
    YEAR 1, PROPER 24, MONDAY: MORNING PRAYER The First Lesson. The Reader begins A Reading from the Book of Jeremiah The word that came to Jeremiah concerning all the Jews that dwelt in the land of Egypt, at Migdol, at Tah'panhes, at Memphis, and in the land of Pathros, “Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: You have seen all the evil that I brought upon Jerusalem and upon all the cities of Judah. Behold, this day they are a desolation, and no one dwells in them, because of the wickedness which they committed, provoking me to anger, in that they went to burn incense and serve other gods that they knew not, neither they, nor you, nor your fathers. Yet I persistently sent to you all my servants the prophets, saying, ‘Oh, do not do this abominable thing that I hate!’ But they did not listen or incline their ear, to turn from their wickedness and burn no incense to other gods. Therefore my wrath and my anger were poured forth and kindled in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem; and they became a waste and a desolation, as at this day. And now thus says the LORD God of hosts, the God of Israel: Why do you commit this great evil against yourselves, to cut off from you man and woman, YEAR 1, PROPER 24, MONDAY: MORNING PRAYER JEREMIAH 44:1–14; 1 CORINTHIANS 15:30–41 infant and child, from the midst of Judah, leaving you no remnant? Why do you provoke me to anger with the works of your hands, burning incense to other gods in the land of Egypt where you have come to live, that you may be cut off and become a curse and a taunt among all the nations of the earth? Have you forgotten the wickedness of your fathers, the wickedness of the kings of Judah, the wickedness of their wives, your own wickedness, and the wickedness of your wives, which they committed in the land of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem? They have not humbled themselves even to this day, nor have they feared, nor walked in my law and my statutes which I set before you and before your fathers.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremiah Chapter 44
    Jeremiah Chapter 44 Jeremiah 44:1 "The word that came to Jeremiah concerning all the Jews which dwell in the land of Egypt, which dwell at Migdol, and at Tahpanhes, and at Noph, and in the country of Pathros, saying," “The word that came”: The unrelenting iniquity of the Jews called for yet another prophecy of judgment on them in Egypt. “Migdol” may be identified with the Magdali mentioned in the Amarna Tablets of ancient Egypt. “Noph” is a variant of Moph, the Hebrew name of Memphis, the foremost city of lower (or northern), “Egypt”. “Pathros” was a general designation of upper (or southern), Egypt. The Jews apparently dispersed throughout Egypt quickly. In the last lessons Jeremiah had warned them not to go to Egypt, or the wrath of God would descend upon them. We see they have defied the warnings and went to Egypt anyhow. The names above are just some of the cities in Egypt where they are living. I want to say one more time, Egypt is a type of the world. The message for Christians in this is to stay in the city of God. Do not go back into the world after you are saved. Verses 2-6: The prophet summarized what had occurred in Judah as a basis for what he predicted coming on the refugees in Egypt. Jeremiah 44:2 "Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Ye have seen all the evil that I have brought upon Jerusalem, and upon all the cities of Judah; and, behold, this day they [are] a desolation, and no man dwelleth therein," In which manner, the prophecies of this book are frequently prefaced (see Jer.
    [Show full text]
  • What Did King Josiah Reform?
    Chapter 17 What Did King Josiah Reform? Margaret Barker King Josiah changed the religion of Israel in 623 BC. According to the Old Testament account in 2 Kings 23, he removed all manner of idolatrous items from the temple and purified his kingdom of Canaanite practices. Temple vessels made for Baal, Asherah, and the host of heaven were removed, idolatrous priests were deposed, the Asherah itself was taken from the temple and burned, and much more besides. An old law book had been discovered in the temple, and this had prompted the king to bring the religion of his kingdom into line with the requirements of that book (2 Kings 22:8–13; 2 Chronicles 34:14–20).1 There could be only one temple, it stated, and so all other places of sacrificial worship had to be destroyed (Deuteronomy 12:1–5). The law book is easily recognizable as Deuteronomy, and so King Josiah’s purge is usually known as the Deuteronomic reform of the temple. In 598 BC, twenty-five years after the work of Josiah, Jerusalem was attacked by the Babylonians under King Nebuchadnezzar (2 Kings 24:10– 16; 25:1–9); eleven years after the first attack, they returned to destroy the city and the temple (586 BC). Refugees fled south to Egypt, and we read in the book of Jeremiah how they would not accept the prophet’s interpretation of the disaster (Jeremiah 44:16–19). Jeremiah insisted that Jerusalem had fallen because of the sins of her people, but the refugees said it had fallen because of Josiah.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremiah Dr. R. Wade Paschal
    Jeremiah Dr. R. Wade Paschal Jeremiah, p. 2 Dr. Paschal takes us deep into the book of the prophet Jeremiah. One of the strengths of these lessons is the connections that are made throughout the Bible that both place Jeremiah in the Old Testament context, and also thematically as a whole. In the materials, you will find timelines, backgrounds, and cross-references that provide you the teacher a wealth of knowledge in which to teach from. There are more materials in each lesson, then you could possibly teach in a normal session, so you the teacher will have to make tough decisions on what to cut out in the materials. As with most teaching, one of the hardest decisions that you will make is what not to say or teach. Dr. Paschal also provides some questions that you can use to help people go deeper into the text. If you are looking for an orderly book, Jeremiah is not it, so the thematic based approach that Dr. Paschal uses is very helpful to understand the big concepts. Please familiarize yourself with the Historical overview in lesson one, which I found to be extremely helpful. Here is an overview of the lessons. Lesson 1: The Life and Times of Jeremiah, Part One Lesson 2: The Life and Times of Jeremiah, Part Two Lesson 3: The Life and Times of Jeremiah, Part Three Lesson 4: The Prayers of Jeremiah Lesson 5: The Failure of Leadership Lesson 6: The Problem of Sin Lesson 7: The Return of Israel after 70 Years Lesson 8: Messiah and Future Salvation Jeremiah, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremiah Part 2 Leader Guide (NASB and ESV)
    Jeremiah Part 2 Leader Guide (NASB and ESV) WHEN GOD’S JUDGMENT FINALLY COMES (Chapters 25–52) i Jeremiah Part 2 Leader Guide (NASB and ESV) © 2010, 2013, 2018 Precept Ministries International Published by Precept Ministries of Reach Out, Inc. Chattanooga, Tennessee 37422 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the U.S.A. Unless otherwise noted Scripture quotations are from the New American Standard Bible® © The Lockman Foundation, 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission. www.lockman.org Scripture quotations marked ESV are taken from ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®) © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 3rd Edition (3/2018) ii USING LEADER GUIDES Leader Guides are intended for you, the leader, to guide your Precept Upon Precept® and In & Out® discussions. They are designed to help you reason through the content of the lessons and to ensure you have understood what your group should have learned from their study. The guides offer effective plans for leading discussions. The Holy Spirit is your guide as you prepare. He is the one who knows what your group needs to apply to their lives. Pray for them as they study and for yourself as you prepare to lead the discussion. These guides can be used for either the NASB or the ESV edition of the courses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Prophetic Appeal in Jeremiah 2:1-4:4
    Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 2007 The Call for the Unfaithful Wife to Return: The Rhetoric of Prophetic Appeal in Jeremiah 2:1-4:4 Gary E. Yates Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Yates, Gary E., "The Call for the Unfaithful Wife to Return: The Rhetoric of Prophetic Appeal in Jeremiah 2:1-4:4" (2007). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 11. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ETS: San Diego, 2007 “The Call for the Unfaithful Wife to Return: The Rhetoric of Prophetic Appeal in Jeremiah 2:1-4:4” Gary E. Yates, Ph.D. (Liberty Theological Seminary) Introduction Martin Luther observed that that the prophets “have a queer way of talking, like people who, instead of proceeding in an orderly manner, ramble off from one thing to the next, so that you cannot make head or tail of them or see what they are getting at.” One might be inclined to these sentiments when attempting to make sense of the composition and arrangement of Jeremiah 2:1-4:4, the opening block of prophetic messages in the book following the call narrative of chapter 1. Abma notes concerning this section: Jeremiah 2:1-4:4 is a complex text which switches from poetry to prose, from the past to the present, from one addressee to another and from one eloquent meta- phor to another in order to portray Israel’s conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trustworthy Word Lesson 40 Prophetic Prosecution & Promise
    The Trustworthy Word Lesson 40 Prophetic Prosecution & Promise Lesson 34 (5/29): The canon of Scripture has divine qualities which demonstrate that it cannot be merely a human book, but must be what it claims to be: a revelation from God. Lesson 35 (6/12): One of the divine qualities of Scripture is its unity. This includes unity of teaching, literary structure, unfolding revelation. Lesson 36 (6/19): One of the most remarkable evidences of the unity of Scripture is the theme of covenants. Covenants began in the Old Testament with the covenant with all men through Noah; the covenant promises that extend to all nations through Abraham and his family; and the covenant with Abraham’s descendants through Moses at Mt. Sinai. Lesson 37 (6/26): The covenant at Sinai was recorded in writing, then broken, reinstituted, rejected, and then renewed for a new generation about to enter the promised land. Deuteronomy especially includes remarkable covenant promises. Lesson 38 (7/17): During the time of Joshua and the judges, we find the themes of covenant unfaithfulness and renewal occurring over and over again. During the time of Samuel, the box that symbolized God’s covenant presence was not effectual in battle and was stolen by the Philistines. Lesson 39 (7/24): David brought the covenant box to a tent in Jerusalem and renewed covenant worship. Solomon built a temple, and God’s presence came. But Solomon did not keep the covenant, and throughout the history of Israel’s kings the cycle of covenant unfaithfulness and renewal continued. There were many brief covenant revivals, but long periods of rejecting and even completely forgetting their covenant relationship with God.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremiah to Egypt
    NOTES Jeremiah 43 – Jeremiah To Egypt 9-10 Take large stones in your hand, and hide them in the sight of NOTES the men of Judah, in the clay in the brick courtyard which is at the entrance to Pharaoh’s house in Tahpanhes; and say to them, Jeremiah 43 – Jeremiah To Egypt ‘Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: “Behold, I will 9-10 Take large stones in your hand, and hide them in the sight of the men of send and bring Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, My Judah, in the clay in the brick courtyard which is at the entrance to servant, and will set his throne above these stones that I have Pharaoh’s house in Tahpanhes; and say to them, ‘Thus says the LORD of hidden. And he will spread his royal pavilion over them - When hosts, the God of Israel: “Behold, I will send and bring Nebuchadnezzar Tell Defenneh was explored by W. M. F. Petrie in 1886, he identified the king of Babylon, My servant, and will set his throne above these a large structure as the Pharaoh’s palace. When he asked the locals stones that I have hidden. And he will spread his royal pavilion over them - what they called it, they responded, “kasr bint el Yehudi,” which When Tell Defenneh was explored by W. M. F. Petrie in 1886, he identified a means “the Palace of the Jew’s daughter.” Petrie suggested that this large structure as the Pharaoh’s palace. When he asked the locals what they site was a regular point through which Jews traveled on their way to called it, they responded, “kasr bint el Yehudi,” which means “the Palace of the Egypt during the sixth century b.c.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 9 How Would They Survive?
    LESSON 9 HOW WOULD THEY SURVIVE? I. What is the aim of this lesson? The aim of this lesson is to explore different approaches toward Jewish survival after the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple and the exile of the People from the Land. II. Why is this lesson important? Although the Jewish People have survived, and at times even thrived, outside the Land, their survival could not be taken for granted when they were first exiled from it. The tribes of Israel who were exiled in 722 BCE largely assimilated into the local culture and there was no way for the tribe of Judah to be absolutely certain that they would not suffer the same fate. The fact that the Jews in Babylonia came to terms with the loss of their national homeland and found ways to adapt to the new circumstances became one of the hallmarks of Jewish existence throughout the ages, and it was their unwillingness to relinquish the dream of an eventual return to the Land that served as an inspiration to future generations. III. Texts, questions and central ideas of the lesson: Background In the latter half of the 8 th century BCE the kingdom of Assyria became a world empire which changed the face of the ancient Near East. In addition to of transforming conquered states into Assyrian provinces administered by Assyrian governors, the Assyrian kings developed a process of mass deportation and resettlement. Entire conquered populations were exiled from their land and resettled in other regions of the empire in the hope that they would assimilate among the local population and no longer pose a threat to the empire.
    [Show full text]