Arxiv:1709.03355V1 [Nucl-Ex]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Evidence for Z=6 ‘magic number’ in neutron-rich carbon isotopes D.T. Tran,1, 2 H.J. Ong,1, ∗ G. Hagen,3, 4 T. D. Morris,3, 4 N. Aoi,1 T. Suzuki,5, 6 Y. Kanada-En’yo,7 L.S. Geng,8 S. Terashima,8 I. Tanihata,1, 8 T.T. Nguyen,9, 10 Y. Ayyad,1 P.Y. Chan,1 M. Fukuda,11 H. Geissel,12, 13 M.N. Harakeh,14 T. Hashimoto,15 T.H. Hoang,1, 2 E. Ideguchi,1 A. Inoue,1 G. R. Jansen,16, 3 R. Kanungo,17 T. Kawabata,7 L.H. Khiem,2 W.P. Lin,18 K. Matsuta,11 M. Mihara,11 S. Momota,19 D. Nagae,20 N.D. Nguyen,21 D. Nishimura,22 T. Otsuka,23 A. Ozawa,24 P.P. Ren,18 H. Sakaguchi,1 C. Scheidenberger,12, 13 J. Tanaka,1 M. Takechi,25 R. Wada,18, 26 and T. Yamamoto1 1RCNP, Osaka University, Osaka 567-0047, Japan. 2Institute of Physics, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam. 3Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA. 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA 5Department of Physics, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, Tokyo 156-8550, Japan. 6National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan. 7Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. 8School of Physics and Nuclear Energy Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 9Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh 700000, Vietnam 10Faculty of Physics and Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City 70250, Vietnam. 11Department of Physics, Osaka University, Osaka 560-0043, Japan 12GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨ur Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany. 13Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany. 14KVI Center for Advanced Radiation Technology, University of Groningen, 9747 AA Groningen, The Netherlands. 15Rare Isotope Science Project, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon 34047, Korea. 16National Center for Computational Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA 17Astronomy and Physics Department, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada. 18Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China. 19Kochi University of Technology, Kochi 782-8502, Japan 20RIKEN Nishina Center, Saitama 351-0198, Japan. 21Dong Nai University, Dong Nai 81000, Vietnam. 22Tokyo University of Science, Chiba 278-8510, Japan 23Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. 24Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan. 25Department of Physics, Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan. 26Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, Texas 77840, USA. (Dated: September 4, 2017) The nuclear shell structure, which originates in the nearly independent motion of nucleons in an average potential, provides an important guide for our understanding of nuclear structure and the underlying nuclear forces. Its most remarkable fingerprint is the existence of the so-called ‘magic numbers’ of protons and neutrons associated with extra stability. Although the introduction of a phenomenological spin-orbit (SO) coupling force in 1949 helped explain the nuclear magic numbers, its origins are still open questions. Here, we present experimental evidence for the smallest SO-originated magic number (subshell closure) at the proton number 6 in 13−20C obtained from systematic analysis of point-proton distribution radii, electromagnetic transition rates and atomic 14,15 arXiv:1709.03355v1 [nucl-ex] 11 Sep 2017 masses of light nuclei. Performing ab initio calculations on C, we show that the observed proton distribution radii and subshell closure can be explained by the state-of-the-art nuclear theory with chiral nucleon-nucleon and three-nucleon forces, which are rooted in the quantum chromodynamics. Atomic nuclei – the finite quantum many-body sys- one – 28, 50, 82, and 126 – is due to the spin-orbit (SO) tems consisting of protons and neutrons (known collec- coupling force (see Fig. 1). It was the introduction of tively as nucleons) – exhibit shell structure, in analogy to this SO force – a force that depends on the intrinsic spin the electronic shell structure of atoms. Atoms with filled of a nucleon and its orbital angular momentum, and the electron shells – known as the noble gases – are particu- so-called j-j coupling scheme that helped explain [1, 2] larly stable chemically. The filling of the nuclear shells, completely the magic numbers, and won Goeppert-Mayer on the other hand, leads to the magic-number nuclei. and Jensen the Nobel Prize. However, the microscopic The nuclear magic numbers, as we know in stable and origins of the SO coupling force have remained unresolved naturally-occurring nuclei, consist of two different series due to the difficulty to describe the structure of atomic of numbers. The first series – 2, 8, 20 – is attributed to nuclei from ab initio nuclear theories [3–5] with two- (NN) the harmonic oscillator (HO) potential, while the second and three-nucleon forces (3NFs). Although the theoret- 2 ical study [6] of the SO splitting of the 1p and 1p 50 1/2 3/2 1g 9/2 15 2p single-particle states in N has suggested possible roles 1/2 2p 1f 5/2 of two-body SO and tensor forces, as well as three-body 1f 2p 3/2 28 forces, the discovery of the so-far elusive SO-type magic 20 1f 7/2 20 number 6 is expected to offer unprecedented opportuni- 2s 1d 3/2 1d ties to understand its origins. 2s 1/2 1d 5/2 In her Nobel lecture, Goeppert-Mayer had mentioned 8 8 1p 1/2 the magic numbers 6 and 14 – which she described as 1p 6 ? 1p 3/2 2 “hardly noticeable” – but surmised that the energy gap 2 between the 1p1/2 and 1p3/2 orbitals due to the SO force 1s 1s 1/2 harmonic spin-orbit is “fairly small” [7]. That the j-j coupling scheme ap- + l 2 + pears to fail in the p-shell light nuclei was discussed and oscillator coupling attributed to their tendency to form clusters of nucle- FIG. 1. Nuclear shell structure for a harmonic oscillator po- ons [8]. Experimental and theoretical studies in recent tential plus a small orbital angular momentum (l2) term. The decades, however, have hinted at the possible existence right diagram shows the splitting of the single-particle orbitals of the magic number 6 in some semimagic unstable nu- by an additional spin-orbit coupling force. clei, each of which has a HO-type magic number of the opposite type of nucleons. For instance, possible sub- shell closures have been suggested in 8He [9, 10], 14C and the observations are supported by the ab-initio nuclear 14O [11]. Whether such subshell closures exist, and are model that employs the nuclear forces derived from the predominently driven by the shell closures of the counter- effective field theory of the quantum chromodynamics. part protons/neutrons are of fundamental importance. Although still not well established, the size of a nu- The isotopic chain of carbon – with six protons and cleus, which can be defined as the root-mean-square consisting of thirteen particle-bound nuclei, provides an (rms) radius of its nucleon distribution, is expected to important platform to study the SO splitting of the provide important insights on the evolution of the magic 1p1/2 and 1p3/2 orbitals. Like other lighter isotopes, numbers. Recently, an unexpectedly large proton rms ra- the isotopes of carbon are known to exhibit both clus- dius (denoted simply as ‘proton radius’ hereafter) was re- tering and single-particle behaviours. While the sec- ported [21], and suggested as a possible counter-evidence ond excited J π=0+ state in 12C – the famous Hoyle for the double shell closure in 52Ca [22]. Attempts to state and important doorway state that helps produce identify any emergence of non-traditional magic numbers 12C in stars – is well understood as a triple-alpha state, based on the analysis of the systematics of the exper- it seems that the effect of the alpha-cluster-breaking imental proton radii have been reported [11, 23]. For 1p3/2 subshell closure is important to reproduce the the 4<Z< 10 region, the lack of experimental data on ground-state binding energy [12]. For even-even neutron- the proton radii of neutron-rich nuclei due to the exper- rich carbon isotopes, theoretical calculations using the imental and theoretical limitations of the isotope-shift anti-symmetrized molecular dynamics (AMD) [13], shell method has hindered systematic analysis of the radii be- model [14, 15], as well as the ab-initio no-core shell haviour. Such systematic analysis has become possible model calculation [16] with NN+3NFs have predicted very recently owing to the development of an alternative near-constant proton distributions, a widening gap be- method to extract the proton radii of neutron-rich nuclei tween proton 1p1/2 and 1p3/2 single-particle orbits, and from the charge-changing cross-section measurements. a remarkably low proton occupancy in the 1p1/2 or- The charge-changing cross section (denoted as σCC) of bit, respectively. Experimentally, small B(E2) values a projectile nucleus on a nuclear/proton target is defined comparable to that of 16O were reported from the life- as the total cross section of all processes that change the + + time measurements of the first excited 2 (21 ) states proton number of the projectile nucleus. Applying this in 16,18C [17, 18]. The small B(E2) values indicate small method, we have determined the proton radii of 14Be [24], 12−17 12−19 proton contributions to the transitions, and together with B [25] and C [26] from the σCC measurements the theoretical predictions may imply the existence of a at GSI, Darmstadt, using secondary beams at around 900 proton subshell closure.