Outcome of Split Thickness Skin Grafts on Excised Burns with Different Dermal Compositions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Outcome of Split Thickness Skin Grafts on Excised Burns with Different Dermal Compositions Department of Plastic Surgery and Department of Pharmacology Faculty of Medicine University of Helsinki Finland Outcome of split thickness skin grafts on excised burns with different dermal compositions Heli Lagus Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Helsinki, for public examination Porthania lecture hall P674, Helsinki, on June 26th 2020, at 12 o’clock noon. Helsinki 2020 Supervised by Professor Jyrki Vuola, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Plastic Surgery Helsinki Burn Centre Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki Finland Docent Esko Kankuri, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Pharmacology University of Helsinki Finland Reviewed by Julian Dye, MA (Oxon), Ph.D. (Lon) CBiol, FRSB Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Oxford United Kingdom Docent Ilkka Kaartinen, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Plastic Surgery Tampere University Hospital Finland Opponent Professor Esther Middelkoop, Ph.D. in biochemistry Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands The Faculty of Medicine uses the Urkund system (plagiarism recognition) to examine all doctoral dissertations. ISBN: 978-951-51-6066-9 (print) ISBN: 978-951-51-6067-6 (on-line) University Printing House Helsinki 2020 To my family 3 Table of Contents List of original publications........................................................................................................... 6 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 7 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 9 2. Review of the literature ........................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Function and structure of skin ................................................................................. 10 2.1.1 Epidermis ............................................................................................................. 10 2.1.2 Basement membrane ........................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Dermis ................................................................................................................. 12 2.1.4 Subcutis or hypodermis ....................................................................................... 15 2.1.5 Skin homeostasis and maintenance by ECM and dermal fibroblasts .................. 15 2.2 Cell structure and function ...................................................................................... 15 2.2.1 Cell cycle ............................................................................................................. 16 2.2.2 Gene expression ................................................................................................... 16 2.2.3 Cell signaling ....................................................................................................... 17 2.3 Wound healing ........................................................................................................ 25 2.3.1 Wound healing phases ......................................................................................... 26 2.3.2 Factors affecting wound healing .......................................................................... 34 2.4 Temporary and permanent wound covers ............................................................... 35 2.4.1 Temporary wound covers .................................................................................... 35 2.4.2 Permanent wound covers/ skin replacements ...................................................... 35 2.4.3 Dermo-epidermal substitutes /composite skin substitutes ................................... 37 2.4.4 Bioengineered wound covers............................................................................... 37 2.5 Scar assessment methods ........................................................................................ 41 2.5.1 Scar assessment scales currently available .......................................................... 41 2.5.2 Objective scar measuring devices ........................................................................ 42 2.5.3 Protein profiling methods .................................................................................... 43 2.6 Psoriasis .................................................................................................................. 44 3. Aims of the study .................................................................................................................... 46 4. Materials and methods ............................................................................................................. 47 4.1 Patients .................................................................................................................... 47 4.1.1 Burn patients ........................................................................................................ 47 4.1.2 Psoriasis patients ................................................................................................. 47 4.1.3 Healthy controls ................................................................................................... 47 4.2 Wounds and wound cover materials ....................................................................... 47 4.2.1 Burn wound type and location ............................................................................. 47 4.2.2 Timeline of the study ........................................................................................... 48 4.2.3 Skin samples (I, II, and III).................................................................................. 49 Assessment and analysis methods .......................................................................................... 51 4.2.4 Vancouver Scar Scale .......................................................................................... 51 4.2.5 Proteomics ........................................................................................................... 51 4.2.6 Imaging and image analysis ................................................................................ 52 4.2.7 Statistical and biostatistical analyses, tools and databases .................................. 53 4.2.8 Cell stimulation experiments ............................................................................... 54 5. Results ..................................................................................................................................... 57 5.1 Histology and immunohistochemistry .................................................................... 57 5.1.1 Inflammation ....................................................................................................... 57 5.1.2 Proliferation ......................................................................................................... 57 5.1.3 Remodeling phase 3 weeks to 12 months ............................................................ 58 5.2 Clinical findings-VSS ............................................................................................. 60 5.3 Proteomics .............................................................................................................. 62 5.3.1 Gene expression analyses .................................................................................... 65 4 5.3.2 Cell stimulation experiments ............................................................................... 65 6. Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 67 6.1 The effects of different treatment materials on wound healing and on STSGs, and long-term outcome one year after surgery, studies I & II .................................. 67 6.1.1 Biocompatibility and biodegradability ................................................................ 68 6.1.2 Inflammation ....................................................................................................... 68 6.1.3 Proliferation phase ............................................................................................... 69 6.2 The long-term effects of different early wound-bed treatment materials detected in proteomics and reflected to psoriasis, study III ................................................... 75 6.2.1 Proteomic findings in skin samples of burn patients ........................................... 75 6.2.2 Validations ........................................................................................................... 76 6.2.3 IPA and TRANSFAC® analyses ........................................................................ 77 6.2.4 DNAH10 mRNA splice variants ......................................................................... 77 6.2.5 DNAH10 expression in inflammatory skin pathology psoriasis ......................... 78 6.2.6 DNAH10 in cell stimulation experiments ........................................................... 78 7. Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 81 8. Future prospects .....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Expression of Type XVI Collagen in Human Skin Fibroblasts: Enhanced Expression in Fibrotic Skin Diseases
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Expression of Type XVI Collagen in Human Skin Fibroblasts: Enhanced Expression in Fibrotic Skin Diseases Atsushi Akagi, Shingo Tajima, Akira Ishibashi,* Noriko Yamaguchi,† and Yutaka Nagai Department of Dermatology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan; *Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.; †Koken Bioscience Institute, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan Abundance of type XVI collagen mRNA in normal level was elevated 2.3-fold in localized scleroderma human dermal fibroblasts explanted from different and 3.6-fold in systemic scleroderma compared with horizontal layers was determined using RNase protec- keloid and normal controls. Immunofluorescent study tion assays. Type XVI collagen mRNA level in the revealed that an intense immunoreactivity with the fibroblasts explanted from the upper dermis was antibody was observed in the upper to lower dermal greater than those of the middle and lower dermis. matrix and fibroblasts in the skin of systemic The antibody raised against the synthetic N-terminal scleroderma as compared with normal skin. The noncollagenous region reacted with ≈210 kDa colla- results suggest that expression of type XVI collagen, a genous polypeptide in the culture medium of member of fibril-associated collagens with interrupted fibroblasts. Immunohistochemical study of normal triple helices, in human skin fibroblasts can be human skin demonstrated that the antibody reacted heterogeneous in the dermal layers and can be preferentially with the fibroblasts and the extracellular modulated by some fibrotic diseases. Key words: matrix in the upper dermis rather than those in the dermal fibroblast/scleroderma/type XVI collagen.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Proteome of Human Hair - Identifcation of Histones and Deamidated Keratins Received: 15 August 2017 Sunil S
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Studies on the Proteome of Human Hair - Identifcation of Histones and Deamidated Keratins Received: 15 August 2017 Sunil S. Adav 1, Roopa S. Subbaiaih2, Swat Kim Kerk 2, Amelia Yilin Lee 2,3, Hui Ying Lai3,4, Accepted: 12 January 2018 Kee Woei Ng3,4,7, Siu Kwan Sze 1 & Artur Schmidtchen2,5,6 Published: xx xx xxxx Human hair is laminar-fbrous tissue and an evolutionarily old keratinization product of follicle trichocytes. Studies on the hair proteome can give new insights into hair function and lead to the development of novel biomarkers for hair in health and disease. Human hair proteins were extracted by detergent and detergent-free techniques. We adopted a shotgun proteomics approach, which demonstrated a large extractability and variety of hair proteins after detergent extraction. We found an enrichment of keratin, keratin-associated proteins (KAPs), and intermediate flament proteins, which were part of protein networks associated with response to stress, innate immunity, epidermis development, and the hair cycle. Our analysis also revealed a signifcant deamidation of keratin type I and II, and KAPs. The hair shafts were found to contain several types of histones, which are well known to exert antimicrobial activity. Analysis of the hair proteome, particularly its composition, protein abundances, deamidated hair proteins, and modifcation sites, may ofer a novel approach to explore potential biomarkers of hair health quality, hair diseases, and aging. Hair is an important and evolutionarily conserved structure. It originates from hair follicles deep within the der- mis and is mainly composed of hair keratins and KAPs, which form a complex network that contributes to the rigidity and mechanical properties.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Mechanism of Metastasis in Postpartum Breast Cancer
    WEANING-INDUCED LIVER INVOLUTION: A NOVEL MECHANISM OF METASTASIS IN POSTPARTUM BREAST CANCER By Erica T. Goddard A THESIS/DISSERTATION Presented to the Cancer Biology Program & the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2017 School of Medicine Oregon Health & Science University CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL ______________________________ This is to certify that the PhD dissertation of Erica Thornton Goddard has been approved _________________________________ Pepper J. Schedin, PhD, Mentor/Advisor _________________________________ Virginia F. Borges, MD, MMSc, Clinical Mentor/Advisor _________________________________ Melissa H. Wong, PhD, Oral Exam Committee Chair _________________________________ Lisa Coussens, PhD, Member _________________________________ Amanda W. Lund, PhD, Member _________________________________ Caroline Enns, PhD, Member _________________________________ Willscott E. Naugler, MD, Member Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ vii List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................ viii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table SD1. Patient Characteristicsa
    Table SD1. Patient characteristicsa Patient Sex Age Esophageal Treatment Maximum Cell Maximum Maximum Genotype Food SPT/Ab SPT/F b RAST b Rhinitisc Atopicc Asthmac Alternative diagnosis Dated (year) Disease eosinophils thickness in mast cells lymphocytes anaphylaxis (positive dermatitis /hpf basal layer /hpf /hpf reaction) 1 M 11 NL None 0 3 5 3 Unk No ND ND ND Yes No No Recurrent croup December 2 M 11 NL LTRA 0 3 4 3 Unk No ND ND ND No No Yes Functional abdominal pain May 3 F 9 NL None 0 3 4 3 Unk Unk ND ND ND Unk Unk Unk Functional abdominal pain March 4 M 14 NL None 0 2 6 4 Unk No ND ND ND No No No Vomiting/diarrhea Febuary 5 F 7 NL LTRA 0 3 5 6 Unk Yes 1 3 ND Unk Unk Yes Functional abdominal pain March 6 F 13 NL None 0 2 4 2 Unk No 0 4 ND No No No Functional abdominal pain August 7 M 17 CE PPI 0 4 7 12 Unk Yes 17 4 ND No No Yes None November 8 M 6 CE PPI 0 4 6 10 Unk Unk ND ND ND Unk Unk Unk None June 9 F 16 CE LTRA 3 4 6 8 Unk No ND ND ND No No Yes None January 10 F 13 CE LTRA+PPI 3 5 4 8 Unk No 0 0 ND No No No None August 11 F 11 CE LTRA+PPI 6 4 6 9 Unk Unk ND ND ND Unk Unk Unk None May 12 M 11 EE PPI 24 6 6 12 TT No 2 5 3 Yes No Yes None November 13 F 4 EE PPI 25 6 15 15 TT No 0 0 ND No No No None November 14 M 15 EE None 30 6 24 6 TG Unk 1 1 ND Unk Unk Yes None February 15 M 15 EE None 31 6 15 11 TT No 8 2 ND Yes No Yes None March 16 M 13 EE PPI 32 6 10 25 TG No 0 0 ND No No No None June 17 M 6 EE PPI 40 7 10 21 TT Yes 5 3 0 Unk Unk No None November 18 M 13 EE LTRA 42 7 10 5 TT No 4 5 2 Yes Yes Yes None November 19 F 16 EE LTRA+PPI
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Network and Pathway Analysis of Transcriptional Signatures Characterizing Sole Ulcer and Digital Dermatitis in Dairy Cows
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021 Gene Network and Pathway Analysis of Transcriptional Signatures Characterizing Sole Ulcer and Digital Dermatitis in Dairy Cows Roshin Anie Mohan South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Dairy Science Commons Recommended Citation Mohan, Roshin Anie, "Gene Network and Pathway Analysis of Transcriptional Signatures Characterizing Sole Ulcer and Digital Dermatitis in Dairy Cows" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5278. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/5278 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENE NETWORK AND PATHWAY ANALYSIS OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL SIGNATURES CHARACTERIZING SOLE ULCER AND DIGITAL DERMATITIS IN DAIRY COWS BY ROSHIN ANIE MOHAN A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Major in Biological Sciences Specialization in Dairy Science South Dakota State University 2021 ii DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE PAGE Roshin Anie Mohan This dissertation is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree and is acceptable for meeting the dissertation requirements for this degree. Acceptance of this does not imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department.
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Expression of Several Collagen Genes Is Associated With
    Journal of Cancer 2016, Vol. 7 1295 Ivyspring International Publisher Journal of Cancer 2016; 7(10): 1295-1310. doi: 10.7150/jca.15371 Research Paper Increased Expression of Several Collagen Genes is Associated with Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines Radosław Januchowski1, Monika Świerczewska1, Karolina Sterzyńska1, Karolina Wojtowicz1, Michał Nowicki1, Maciej Zabel1,2 1. Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; 2. Department of Histology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland. Corresponding author: Radosław Januchowski, mailing address: Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Święcickiego 6 St., Poznań, post code 61-781, phone number +48618546419, fax number +48 618546440, email address: [email protected]. © Ivyspring International Publisher. Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. See http://ivyspring.com/terms for terms and conditions. Received: 2016.02.25; Accepted: 2016.05.23; Published: 2016.06.25 Abstract Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. The main reason for the high mortality among ovarian cancer patients is the development of drug resistance. The expression of collagen genes by cancer cells can increase drug resistance by inhibiting the penetration of the drug into the cancer tissue as well as increase apoptosis resistance. In this study, we present data that shows differential expression levels of collagen genes and proteins in cisplatin- (CIS), paclitaxel- (PAC), doxorubicin- (DOX), topotecan- (TOP), vincristine- (VIN) and methotrexate- (MTX) resistant ovarian cancer cell lines. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions were performed to determine the mRNA levels. Protein expression was detected using Western blot and immunocytochemistry assays.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Selenocystine on Gene Expression Profiles in Human Keloid
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Genomics 97 (2011) 265–276 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Genomics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ygeno Effect of selenocystine on gene expression profiles in human keloid fibroblasts Bruna De Felice a,⁎, Corrado Garbi b, Robert R. Wilson a, Margherita Santoriello b, Massimo Nacca a a Department of Life Sciences, University of Naples II, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy b Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology and Pathology, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy article info abstract Article history: In this study, selenocystine, a nutritionally available selenoamino acid, was identified for the first time as a Received 15 October 2010 novel agent with anti proliferative activity on human keloids. Accepted 24 February 2011 The 20 μM concentration after 48 h treatment used here was the most effective to reduce keloid fibroblast Available online 1 March 2011 growth. We analyzed the gene expression profile of selenocystine treatment response in keloid fibroblasts by the microarray system to characterize the effects of selenocystine on human keloids. Keywords: The major alterations in keloid fibroblasts following selenocystine exposure included up-regulation of the Keloids Microarray genes encoding cell death and transcription factors. Prominent down-regulation of genes involved in Selenocystine development, cell adhesion and cytoskeleton, as well as extra cellular matrix genes, usually strongly up- Gene expression regulated in keloids, resulted following selenocystine exposure. The range of the down-regulated genes and the degree of the decreased expression appeared to be correlated with the degree of the morphological alterations in selenocystine treated keloids.
    [Show full text]
  • Strand Breaks for P53 Exon 6 and 8 Among Different Time Course of Folate Depletion Or Repletion in the Rectosigmoid Mucosa
    SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE COLON p53 EXONIC STRAND BREAKS DURING FOLATE DEPLETION-REPLETION INTERVENTION Supplemental Figure Legend Strand breaks for p53 exon 6 and 8 among different time course of folate depletion or repletion in the rectosigmoid mucosa. The input of DNA was controlled by GAPDH. The data is shown as ΔCt after normalized to GAPDH. The higher ΔCt the more strand breaks. The P value is shown in the figure. SUPPLEMENT S1 Genes that were significantly UPREGULATED after folate intervention (by unadjusted paired t-test), list is sorted by P value Gene Symbol Nucleotide P VALUE Description OLFM4 NM_006418 0.0000 Homo sapiens differentially expressed in hematopoietic lineages (GW112) mRNA. FMR1NB NM_152578 0.0000 Homo sapiens hypothetical protein FLJ25736 (FLJ25736) mRNA. IFI6 NM_002038 0.0001 Homo sapiens interferon alpha-inducible protein (clone IFI-6-16) (G1P3) transcript variant 1 mRNA. Homo sapiens UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 15 GALNTL5 NM_145292 0.0001 (GALNT15) mRNA. STIM2 NM_020860 0.0001 Homo sapiens stromal interaction molecule 2 (STIM2) mRNA. ZNF645 NM_152577 0.0002 Homo sapiens hypothetical protein FLJ25735 (FLJ25735) mRNA. ATP12A NM_001676 0.0002 Homo sapiens ATPase H+/K+ transporting nongastric alpha polypeptide (ATP12A) mRNA. U1SNRNPBP NM_007020 0.0003 Homo sapiens U1-snRNP binding protein homolog (U1SNRNPBP) transcript variant 1 mRNA. RNF125 NM_017831 0.0004 Homo sapiens ring finger protein 125 (RNF125) mRNA. FMNL1 NM_005892 0.0004 Homo sapiens formin-like (FMNL) mRNA. ISG15 NM_005101 0.0005 Homo sapiens interferon alpha-inducible protein (clone IFI-15K) (G1P2) mRNA. SLC6A14 NM_007231 0.0005 Homo sapiens solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter) member 14 (SLC6A14) mRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Lym. Phoid Enhancer Factor 1 Directs Hair Folhcle Patterning and Epithelial
    Lym.phoid enhancer factor 1 directs hair folhcle patterning and epithelial cell fate Pengbo Zhou, Carolyn Byrne, Jennifer Jacobs, and Elaine Fuchs 1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 USA T cell-specific transcription factor (TCF-1) and lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF-1) have been implicated exclusively in the regulation of T cell-specific genes. The only adult tissue other than thymus known to express these factors is spleen and lymph node, which contain low levels of LEF-1 and no TCF-1. We noticed that genes involved in hair-specific gene expression possess LEF-I/TCF-1 consensus motifs located in similar positions relative to their TATA box. We show that of the two factors only LEF-1 is expressed in hair follicles; it can be cloned in both splice forms from human skin keratinocytes and it can bind to these sites in the hair promoters. We show that LEF-1 mRNA is present in pluripotent ectoderm, and it is up-regulated in a highly restricted pattern just before the formation of underlying mesenchymal condensates and commitment of overlying ectodermal cells to invaginate and become hair follicles. New waves of ectodermal LEF-1 spots appear concomitant with new waves of follicle morphogenesis. To test whether LEF-1 patterning might be functionally important for hair patterning and morphogenesis, we used transgenic technology to alter the patterning and timing of LEF-1 over the surface ectoderm. Striking abnormalities arose in the positioning and orientation of hair follicles, leaving a marked disruption of this normally uniform patterning.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell-Deposited Matrix Improves Retinal Pigment Epithelium Survival on Aged Submacular Human Bruch’S Membrane
    Retinal Cell Biology Cell-Deposited Matrix Improves Retinal Pigment Epithelium Survival on Aged Submacular Human Bruch’s Membrane Ilene K. Sugino,1 Vamsi K. Gullapalli,1 Qian Sun,1 Jianqiu Wang,1 Celia F. Nunes,1 Noounanong Cheewatrakoolpong,1 Adam C. Johnson,1 Benjamin C. Degner,1 Jianyuan Hua,1 Tong Liu,2 Wei Chen,2 Hong Li,2 and Marco A. Zarbin1 PURPOSE. To determine whether resurfacing submacular human most, as cell survival is the worst on submacular Bruch’s Bruch’s membrane with a cell-deposited extracellular matrix membrane in these eyes. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: (ECM) improves retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) survival. 1345–1358) DOI:10.1167/iovs.10-6112 METHODS. Bovine corneal endothelial (BCE) cells were seeded onto the inner collagenous layer of submacular Bruch’s mem- brane explants of human donor eyes to allow ECM deposition. here is no fully effective therapy for the late complications of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading Control explants from fellow eyes were cultured in medium T cause of blindness in the United States. The prevalence of only. The deposited ECM was exposed by removing BCE. Fetal AMD-associated choroidal new vessels (CNVs) and/or geo- RPE cells were then cultured on these explants for 1, 14, or 21 graphic atrophy (GA) in the U.S. population 40 years and older days. The explants were analyzed quantitatively by light micros- is estimated to be 1.47%, with 1.75 million citizens having copy and scanning electron microscopy. Surviving RPE cells from advanced AMD, approximately 100,000 of whom are African explants cultured for 21 days were harvested to compare bestro- American.1 The prevalence of AMD increases dramatically with phin and RPE65 mRNA expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Keratins and Analysis of Their Expression in Carp and Goldfish: Comparison with the Zebrafish and Trout Keratin Catalog
    Cell Tissue Res DOI 10.1007/s00441-005-0031-1 REGULAR ARTICLE Dana M. García . Hermann Bauer . Thomas Dietz . Thomas Schubert . Jürgen Markl . Michael Schaffeld Identification of keratins and analysis of their expression in carp and goldfish: comparison with the zebrafish and trout keratin catalog Received: 21 March 2005 / Accepted: 23 May 2005 # Springer-Verlag Abstract With more than 50 genes in human, keratins zebrafish, and the cyprinid fishes being more similar to each make up a large gene family, but the evolutionary pres- other than to the salmonid trout. Because of the detected sure leading to their diversity remains largely unclear. Nev- similarity of keratin expression among the cyprinid fishes, ertheless, this diversity offers a means to examine the we propose that, for certain experiments, they are inter- evolutionary relationships among organisms that express changeable. Although the zebrafish distinguishes itself as keratins. Here, we report the analysis of keratins expressed being a developmental and genetic/genomic model organ- in two cyprinid fishes, goldfish and carp, by two-dimen- ism, we have found that the goldfish, in particular, is a more sional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, complementary suitable model for both biochemical and histological stud- keratin blot binding assay, and immunoblotting. We further ies of the cytoskeleton, especially since goldfish cytoskel- explore the expression of keratins by immunofluorescence etal preparations seem to be more resistant to degradation microscopy. Comparison is made with the keratin expres- than those from carp or zebrafish. sion and catalogs of zebrafish and rainbow trout. The keratins among these fishes exhibit a similar range of mo- Keywords Keratin .
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Novel Wool Keratin Intermediate Filament Genes in Sheep Skin Z-D
    222 Yu et al. – Wool keratin genes Identification of novel wool keratin intermediate filament genes in sheep skin Z-D. YU1*, S.W. GORDON1, 2, J.E. WILDERMOTH1, O.A.M. WALLACE1, A.J. NIXON1 and A.J. PEARSON1 1AgResearch Ruakura, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand 2Excerpta Medica, Sing Pao Building New Wing, 101 King's Road, North Point, Hong Kong *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Keratin intermediate filament (KIF) genes encode key proteins for hair and wool formation. A total of 17 expressed human KIF genes involved in hair formation are annotated. However, to date, only eight wool KIF genes have been reported. In this study, six new cDNA sequences (KRT32, KRT33B, KRT34, KRT39, KRT40 and KRT82) representing previously unreported wool KIFs were identified using a contiguous ovine sequence library constructed primarily from ESTs. The expression of three other KIF genes (KRT36, KRT84 and KRT87) was confirmed by PCR using sheep skin total RNA. The analogue of human KRT37 (type I) was unable to be identified, while KRT87 (type II) was present in sheep but not in humans. Therefore 10 type I and seven type II KIF family members have been identified in sheep in comparison to 11 and six KIFs in the human. These 17 KIF genes are likely to represent the complete or near-complete set involved in wool formation. The annotation of these genes will facilitate investigation into their patterns of expression in wool follicles and their roles in the determination of fibre attributes. Key words: keratin intermediate filament; wool; gene expression.
    [Show full text]