Court Sites of Arctic Norway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Court Sites of Arctic Norway This article was downloaded by: [University of Oslo] On: 02 September 2013, At: 03:35 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Norwegian Archaeological Review Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/sarc20 Court Sites of Arctic Norway: Remains of Thing Sites and Representations of Political Consolidation Processes in the Northern Germanic World during the First Millennium AD? Stefan Brink a , Oliver Grimm b , Frode Iversen c , Halldis Hobæk c , Marie Ødegaard d , Ulf Näsman e , Alexandra Sanmark f , Przemyslaw Urbanczyk g , Orri Vésteinsson h & Inger Storli i a Centre for Scandinavian Studies, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom b Centre for Baltic and Scandinavian Archaeology, Schleswig, Germany c Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo, Norway d Department of of Archaeology, History, Cultural Studies and Religion, University of Bergen, Norway e Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden f Centre for Nordic Studies, University of the Highlands and Islands, Kirkwall, United Kingdom g Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland h Department of Archaeology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland i Department of Cultural Sciences, Tromsø University Museum, University of Tromsø, Norway Published online: 09 Jun 2011. To cite this article: Stefan Brink , Oliver Grimm , Frode Iversen , Halldis Hobk , Marie degaard , Ulf Nsman , Alexandra Sanmark , Przemyslaw Urbanczyk , Orri Vsteinsson & Inger Storli (2011) Court Sites of Arctic Norway: Remains of Thing Sites and Representations of Political Consolidation Processes in the Northern Germanic World during the First Millennium AD?, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 44:1, 89-117, DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2011.572685 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2011.572685 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/ terms-and-conditions Downloaded by [University of Oslo] at 03:35 02 September 2013 DISCUSSIONSARC Norwegian Archaeological Review, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2011 Comments on Inger Storli: ‘Court Sites of Arctic Norway: Remains of Thing Sites and Representations of Political Consolidation Processes in the Northern Germanic World during the First Millennium AD?’ (Norwegian Archaeological Review 43(2)) ARE THE COURT SITES MULTI- defined so for northern Norway, is not partic- PURPOSE MEETING PLACES? ularly ‘monumental’, compared, e.g., to cent- ral Sweden and southern Norway. CommentsStorli et al. on ‘Court Sites of Arctic Norway’ STEFAN BRINK Two observations which Storli makes in her analysis, and which probably are important, The so-called court sites of western Norway are that it is doubtful that court sites in north- are truly enigmatic. Many ingenious expla- ern Norway were in any way associated with nations have been proposed by many reputed farms at all (Storli 2010:134), an observation scholars over decades. In this article Inger which is backed up by Asle Bruen Olsen’s Storli returns to one of the more cherished (2005) analyses of court sites in western ones, namely to see them in a legal context, Norway. The other observation is that these and she suggests that they are to be under- court sites contain dwellings for humans, stood as – ancient – thing sites. never for animals, and that there are no traces Earlier interpretations are discussed, prob- of remnants from a farming economy, no sta- lematized and dismissed by Storli. The idea of bles, cowsheds, etc. That they must have been them belonging to and controlled by nearby only sporadically inhabited, hence not being chieftains’ farms is obviously not well permanent habitations, has been rather obvi- Downloaded by [University of Oslo] at 03:35 02 September 2013 founded, and Storli can show that it is difficult ous in research for a long time. All this taken to connect them to each other geographically. together indicates periodically used meeting When discussing the defining of chieftain places often strategically situated along the farms by using monumental grave mounds, coast. But meetings for what purpose? one important reference is missing, which A vital problem with all research regarding deals with this problem in an interesting way, the court sites is chronology. The archaeological namely Åke Hyenstrand’s thesis from 1979. A and radiocarbon dating, known so far, indi- problem with this proposal of connecting the cates that they probably are to be dated to the court sites to chieftains’ farms is also that the period c. AD 200–500, hence with a majority to sizes of the ‘monumental grave mounds’, be found in the first half of the first millennium, Stefan Brink, Centre for Scandinavian Studies, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.1080/00293652.2011.572685 © 2011 Taylor & Francis 90 Storli et al. the Early Iron Age. Very few have a dating and a legal society may be reconstructed to later than the Early Viking Age (cf. Storli some degree for the Viking Age. But what 2010:131, 132, 139). Which leads us to the ques- about the Early Iron Age? tion, what do we know of a thing organization, In an attempt to get a context for a legal or any legal society whatsoever, from Early society, where these court sites could fit, Storli Iron Age Scandinavia. Nothing, as far as I can makes two comparative analyses, namely with see. It is interesting to speculate retrogressively, Tacitus’ description in his Germania (AD 97) starting in the Early Middle Ages, on how a and with the ‘free-state’ Icelandic goðorð-insti- legal society might have functioned during the tution (the Norwegianized terms goder and Late Viking Age, trying to connect to the legal godord should not be used in a journal written society we find in our earliest provincial laws, in English directed to an international audi- what is told in the Old Icelandic literature and ence). But what can a description of some Ger- archaeological excavations (see Brink 2003a, manic tribe(s) close to Limes in central 2003b, 2004a). However, a retrogressive ana- Europe, filtered through the mind of a Roman lysis building on our earliest laws, trying to say author who has a programme and purpose in something of legal society and law in the Late his writings, have to say of an Early Iron Age Viking Age or from the enactments in provin- society in northern Norway? And is the Icelan- cial laws, is a hazardous endeavour, and has dic unique goðorð-institution – or what we been considered an impossible approach for know of it – a possible structure to compare decades since the 1960s. However, used care- with? Also, between the two comparative soci- fully, asking questions possible to answer and etal contexts there is around a millennium – with a source-critical cautiousness, it is, in my one thousand years – and this fact ought to opinion, possible to do. The usage of Icelandic make one hesitate. Is this comparison hence parallels, in the way law and the legal society impossible? No, it must be permissible to bring are presented in the sagas, is also a problematic out these sources in this connection, since in exercise, partly because of source-critical con- principle they are the only ones we can consult. siderations, partly because the new Icelandic But, at the same time, one must admit the society certainly differed from the societies in problems which arise and be extremely cau- Norway and Sweden during the Viking Age, tious. Furthermore, there is another early which makes a comparison difficult. But, source which could be consulted, namely Rim- again, it is my opinion that such comparisons bert’s Vita Ansgarii and its description of a are possible, used carefully, and bearing in thing at Birka. To formulate a conclusion that mind the different societies in early Scandina- the North Norwegian court sites may be inter- via and Iceland. Archaeological excavations preted as thing sites, which where ‘regional are important, but, again, most difficult. The representations of the development from tribal Downloaded by [University of Oslo] at 03:35 02 September 2013 reason is how to find out what to look for. confederacies to an early kingdom’ (Storli What might be the physical remnants of a 2010:141), is for
Recommended publications
  • How Uniform Was the Old Norse Religion?
    II. Old Norse Myth and Society HOW UNIFORM WAS THE OLD NORSE RELIGION? Stefan Brink ne often gets the impression from handbooks on Old Norse culture and religion that the pagan religion that was supposed to have been in Oexistence all over pre-Christian Scandinavia and Iceland was rather homogeneous. Due to the lack of written sources, it becomes difficult to say whether the ‘religion’ — or rather mythology, eschatology, and cult practice, which medieval sources refer to as forn siðr (‘ancient custom’) — changed over time. For obvious reasons, it is very difficult to identify a ‘pure’ Old Norse religion, uncorroded by Christianity since Scandinavia did not exist in a cultural vacuum.1 What we read in the handbooks is based almost entirely on Snorri Sturluson’s representation and interpretation in his Edda of the pre-Christian religion of Iceland, together with the ambiguous mythical and eschatological world we find represented in the Poetic Edda and in the filtered form Saxo Grammaticus presents in his Gesta Danorum. This stance is more or less presented without reflection in early scholarship, but the bias of the foundation is more readily acknowledged in more recent works.2 In the textual sources we find a considerable pantheon of gods and goddesses — Þórr, Óðinn, Freyr, Baldr, Loki, Njo3rðr, Týr, Heimdallr, Ullr, Bragi, Freyja, Frigg, Gefjon, Iðunn, et cetera — and euhemerized stories of how the gods acted and were characterized as individuals and as a collective. Since the sources are Old Icelandic (Saxo’s work appears to have been built on the same sources) one might assume that this religious world was purely Old 1 See the discussion in Gro Steinsland, Norrøn religion: Myter, riter, samfunn (Oslo: Pax, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Viking-Age Sailing Routes of the Western Baltic Sea – a Matter of Safety1 by Jens Ulriksen
    Viking-Age sailing routes of the western Baltic Sea – a matter of safety1 by Jens Ulriksen Included in the Old English Orosius, com- weather conditions, currents, shifting sand piled at the court of King Alfred the Great of bars on the sea fl oor and coastal morphol- Wessex around 890,2 are the descriptions of ogy. Being able to cope with the elements of two diff erent late 9th-century Scandinavian nature is important for a safe journey, but sailing routes. Th ese originate from Ohthere, equally important – not least when travelling who sailed from his home in Hålogaland in like Ohthere – is a guarantee of safety for northern Norway to Hedeby, and Wulfstan, ship and crew when coming ashore. Callmer probably an Englishman,3 who travelled suggests convoying as a form of self-protec- from Hedeby to Truso. Th e descriptions are tion, but at the end of the day it would be not detailed to any degree concerning way- vital to negotiate a safe passage with “supra- points or anchorages, and in spite of the fact regional or regional lords”.7 Th ey controlled that lands passed are mentioned in both ac- the landing sites that punctuate Callmer’s counts, the information provided is some- route as stepping-stones. times unclear or confusing. For example, In consequence of the latter, Callmer departing from Hålogaland, Ohthere refers focuses on settlement patterns in order to to both Ireland and England on his starboard identify political and military centres – cen- side even though he obviously has been un- tres with lords who controlled certain areas able to glimpse these lands when sailing of land (and sea) and were able to guaran- along the Norwegian coast.4 Th e same pecu- tee safety within their ‘jurisdiction’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Viking-Age Settlement in the Hinterland of Hedeby Tobias Schade
    L. Holmquist, S. Kalmring & C. Hedenstierna-Jonson (eds.), New Aspects on Viking-age Urbanism, c. 750-1100 AD. Proceedings of the International Symposium at the Swedish History Museum, April 17-20th 2013. Theses and Papers in Archaeology B THESES AND PAPERS IN ARCHAEOLOGY B New Aspects on Viking-age Urbanism, c. 750-1100 AD. Proceedings of the International Symposium at the Swedish History Museum, April 17–20th 2013 Lena Holmquist, Sven Kalmring & Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson (eds.) Contents Introduction Sigtuna: royal site and Christian town and the Lena Holmquist, Sven Kalmring & regional perspective, c. 980-1100 Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson.....................................4 Sten Tesch................................................................107 Sigtuna and excavations at the Urmakaren Early northern towns as special economic and Trädgårdsmästaren sites zones Jonas Ros.................................................................133 Sven Kalmring............................................................7 No Kingdom without a town. Anund Olofs- Spaces and places of the urban settlement of son’s policy for national independence and its Birka materiality Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson...................................16 Rune Edberg............................................................145 Birka’s defence works and harbour - linking The Schleswig waterfront - a place of major one recently ended and one newly begun significance for the emergence of the town? research project Felix Rösch..........................................................153
    [Show full text]
  • Kaupang in Skiringssal
    Kaupang Excavation Project Publication Series, Volume 1 Norske Oldfunn XXII Kaupang in skiringssal Edited by dagfinn skre Kaupang in Skiringssal Kaupang in Skiringssal Edited by Dagfinn Skre Kaupang Excavation Project Publication Series, Volume 1 Norske Oldfunn XXII Kaupang in Skiringssal Kaupang Excavation Project Publication Series, Volume 1 Norske Oldfunn XXII © Aarhus University Press & the Kaupang Excavation Project, University of Oslo 2007 Published as part of the series Norske Oldfunn, Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo English translation: John Hines Language revision: Frank Azevedo, John Hines Technical editing:Frank Azevedo, Dagfinn Skre Map production: Julie K. Øhre Askjem, Anne Engesveen Illustration editing: Elise Naumann, Julie K. Øhre Askjem Cover illustration: Johannes Flintoe: “A Duel. Norwegian Depiction” c. 1835. Nasjonalgalleriet, Oslo. Graphic design, typesetting and cover: Jørgen Sparre Type: Minion and Linotype Syntax Paper: PhoeniXmotion Xantur, 135 g Printed by Narayana Press, Denmark Printed in Denmark 2007 ISBN 978-87-7934-966-7 Copyright maps: Contour distances 1 meter: The Muncipality of Larvik Contour distances 5 metres: Norwegian Mapping and Cadastre Authority Scandinavia Europe: ESRI The University of Oslo wishes to thank the financial contributors to the Kaupang Excavation Project: Ministry of the Environment The Anders Jahre Humanitarian Foundation Ministry of Education and Research Vestfold County Council Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs The Municipality of Larvik The Research Council of Norway Arts Council Norway Preface As the work on this first volume from The Kaupang For the excavation period, the project had an Ad- Excavation Project reaches an end, two feelings dom- visory Committee, which advised on excavation inate: gratitude and humility.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. the Movement South and South-T7est to 9542 the British Isles
    Tbe Mopemcnt Soatb and Soath-Wett t0 954 zos which, helped by a civil war instigated by the priest-king of Mun- srer, he spread his elbows to good effect throughout Ulster. By the capture of Armagh, at once a chief town of the north, the most important ecclesiastical centre oflreland, and one ofthe holy places ofwestern Christendom, he acquired wealth, power, reputation, and his place in Irish tradition. To him and his kind is attributed the esta^blishment of harbour-strongholds at Anagassan, Dublin, Wex- ford, Waterford, Cork and Limerick, with important consequences 3. The Movement South and South-T7est for the subsequent history of both Norse and Irish Ireland. He is to 9542 the British Isles, the Frankish Empire, the Mediterranean .r Io ror,r-ow rN DETATL THE vrKrNG oNSLAUGHT oN Europe whether nation b1' nationr decade, ninth-century r -decade.by or under thl fou.^ generally accepted heads of individual raids for plunder, expeditlons ol political significance and intention, colonial venture; seeking new land for settlement, and enterprises whose main concern was mercantile and commercial, would be a bis task-and in terms of this book a distorting one' It must be en"ough to trace it in general though one hopes indicative outline' We biein with Ireland in the 83os. thJ Irish coast had suffered sporadically from Norwegian plunderers ever since the first raid on Lambeyin Tg5rand sometimes ihe raiders had penetrated far inland. These were painful depreda- tionsrl but bearable, and left the character of country.and-people unchaneed. But nothing could ever be the same again after the arrival6f the famous Tuigeis from Norway shortly before 84o' Our knowledge of him, unfortinately, is at once inflated and diminished bv the leEendary material associated wjth him several hundred years aiter his"death, when he had become a favourite receptacle for Christian.indignation and alarm.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two Northmen: Identities and State Formation in Scandinavia
    Part Two Northmen: Identities and State Formation in Scandinavia 4. PEOPLE AND LAND IN EARLY SCANDINAVIA Stefan Brink ow do Tyskland, Deutschland, Duitsland, Germany, An Ghearmáin, Allemagne, Alemania, Německo, Vācija, and Saksa all relate to each Hother? Well, the answer to this silly question is, of course, that they all are the names of one and the same territorialized political entity found in Europe. Given that, why do we not use one single name for this entity, especially today in our modern, controlled, and nivellating, society of EU-conformism? The answer to this question touches upon the very core of a research field called ‘onomastics’, which studies how names are coined and who coins them. In Sweden (my homeland), our neighbour to the south is Tyskland (if we ignore Bornholm), and etymologically we share the name for this European geographical and political entity with the inhabitants of the country itself, Deutchland, and with the Dutch, who uses the name Duitsland. The name Germany is used in English, Germania in Italian, Германия in Russian, and An Ghearmáin in Irish. In eastern Europe the name of the country is derived from a stem Nem-: Německo in Czeck, Nemecko in Slovak, Niemcy in Polish, and Németország in Hungarian. East of the Baltic the name is derived from a totally different stem beginning with Vo-/Va- as in Latvian Vācija and in Lithuanian Vokietija; whereas Allemagne is used in France, and Alemania in Spain. The Finns, however, use a different designation, namely Saksa, which is similar to Saksamaa in Estonian. Of course, this usage of different names for nations and people is not a new or modern phenomenon as many modern names have roots in early history, and even in prehistory.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Nicolai Arbo and Artistic Hybridity in the Nineteenth-Century
    THE WILD HUNT FOR NORWAY: PETER NICOLAI ARBO AND ARTISTIC HYBRIDITY IN THE NINETEENTH-CENTURY by Dani Kathleen Barrett Huvaere A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Art in Art History MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2018 ©COPYRIGHT by Dani Kathleen Barrett Huvaere 2018 All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION To Josh and Nick. Be well in Valhalla, old friends. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank all those who helped and encouraged me throughout my research. Thank you to the National Museum’s Old Masters and Modern Arts Director Nils Ohlsen for accommodating my last-minute request. Thank you to the library team at the National Museum Library in Oslo, Curator Anita Kongssung and Special Librarian Hildegunn Gullåsen, your help and kindness was invaluable. Thank you to Martin Raddum, the Storage Supervisor for the National Museum, you made my dream come true. Thank you to Charis Gullickson for your advice and help. I would also like to give a heartfelt thank you to my committee, Dr. Todd Larkin, Dr. Regina Gee, and Dr. Melissa Ragain, for supporting me throughout my graduate education. Thank you to School of Art Director Vaughan Judge for funding my research in Norway. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends, and thank you to my husband, Chris, who has been nothing but supportive. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GINNUNGAGAP: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................1 2. NORTHMAN: ARBO IN RELATION TO NINETEENTH- CENTURY NORWAY ....................................................................................................4 3. GOTH AND GAUL: ARTISTIC PRECEDENCE IN DÜSSELDORF AND PARIS ..................................................................................................................16 Düsseldorf Kunstakademie ............................................................................................16 In the Shadow of the École des Beaux-Arts ..................................................................24 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Mops the Scandinavion World Viking
    Mops The Scandinavion world ond Europe in the eorly Viking Age I Scandinavia in the Viking Age 63 The making of modern Europe was a slow and laborious business 2 Scandinavian settlement in Eneland 83 which the historian simplifies at peril. Modern conceptions of national growth and of national types are too easiiy applied to situations in the past where they are distorting, anachronistic and positively misleading. To be obsessed with the image of peaceful and peaceJoving Scandinavian farmers, taken from the history of Scandinavia over the last two centuries, can lead to falsification as great as that provoked by the nursery and early schoolboy image of ruthless Viking axemen, horn-helmeted and heathen, breakers of skulls and despoilers of churches. Reality was much more complex. Not all farmers love peace. A ravager in May can turn a skilful hand to corn-harvest in August. One of the main objects of this book is to point to the highly complex human situation of raid and settle- ment, of piracy and cultivation that we mask under the conveniently smooth description of the viking Age. This Viking Age with its rough chronological extent from 800 to I 100 had a tremendous effect on the making of modern Europe. The process of recovery from the economic dislocation and political disaster which attended the fall of the Roman Empire in the West was not far advanced when the fresh wave of barbarian invasion struck. The historian, and especially the social and economic his- torian with his knowledge of happenings still to come, can see that this recovery was more than recovery, that Europe was proliferating ln new growth, that the Carolingian world was different from and in many ways superior to the late Classical world it aped and thought to be reconstituting.
    [Show full text]
  • Means O F E X Change
    63076_om_kaupang_bind2_r1.qxd 29/07/08 8:05 Side 1 Published in the series Norske Oldfunn, Kaupang Excavation Project Museum of Cultural History, 2 Publication Series, Volume 2 University of Oslo Norske Oldfunn XXIII means This second volume concerning the excavations in the Viking-period town Kaupang in 1998–2003 examines types of find used in economic transactions: coins, silver ingots, hacksilver, balances and weights. Changes in the types and means of volume of economic transactions at Kaupang and in Scandinavia are discussed, and the economic thought-world of Viking-age craftsmen and traders explored. The study of Viking silver currency has previously been based mainly on hoards. In this volume, the integrated study of the types of finds noted, in light of of the detailed chronology of settlement finds from sites such as Kaupang, sheds exchange completely new light upon economy and exchange. In the early 9th century, long-distance trade goods seem to have come to Kaupang mainly from the Carolingian world. In the earliest phase, transactions exchange were made using commodities as payment within a commodity-money system. From c. 825 silver weighed using locally produced lead weights, and possibly also Western coins, was used as currency on a limited scale. The old øre weight-unit was easily convertible into Carolingian measures. After the mid-9th century, trade with Carolingian regions declined and Kaupang was more heavily involved in trade with the Baltic. The greater supply of silver resulting from the importation, via eastern Scandinavia, of Islamic coins, as well as the introduction in most of Scandinavia of standardized weights of probably Islamic origin, paved the way for an increasing use of silver in pay- ment from then on.
    [Show full text]
  • Skiringssal, Kaupang, Tjølling 4 – the Toponymic Evidence
    Skiringssal, Kaupang, Tjølling 4 – the Toponymic Evidence stefan brink This article deals with the toponymic evidence – the place-names – in the Tjølling area, and the hist- orical evidence they may reflect. In the settlement district (bygd) of Tjølling we find a few, probably very old, settlement-names, in -vin and -heimr, presumably to be dated to the first half or the middle of the first mil- lennium. These are grouped around a lake whose name is probably to be found as the first element of one of these names, namely Vittersen. This name may be interpreted as denoting a sacral lake, probably of impor- tance in some cultic activity here, containing a word related to the ON noun vítr, véttr, vettr, vættr ‘supernat- ural being, spirit, god’.Other settlement-names portray the settlement district as a large archipelago during the Iron Age, with several large and small islands, the names of some of which have been preserved. Finally the names Huseby (< Skíringssalr), Tjølling (< Qjóealyng) and Kaupang are interpreted and discussed. These names are to be seen as evidence of the socio-economic importance of this district, with an aristocratic chieftain’s or royal farmstead controlling a major harbour/market-place (Kaupangr). The Tjølling settlement district has enjoyed a lot of focus on Kaupang. The shift can in broad outlines attention in archaeological and historical research for also be said to be one from the area being seen as a centuries, for obvious reasons. The toponymic evi- major political site, one of the significant royal dence, which also is very interesting, has not been strongholds important in state-formation in Norway scrutinized and discussed to the same extent, and that (rikssamlingen), to it being regarded as perhaps the is a pity.
    [Show full text]
  • Scripta Islandica 60
    SCRIPTA ISLANDICA ISLÄNDSKA SÄLLSKAPETS ÅRSBOK 60/2009 ––––––––––– REDIGERAD AV DANIEL SÄVBORG under medverkan av Guðrún Nordal (Reykjavík) Heimir Pálsson (Uppsala) Pernille Hermann (Århus) Mindy MacLeod (Melbourne) Else Mundal (Bergen) Rune Palm (Stockholm) With English summaries UPPSALA, SWEDEN Tryckt med bidrag från Samfundet Sverige–Island © Författarna och Scripta Islandica ISSN 0582-3234 Sättning: Textgruppen i Uppsala AB Tryckning: Reklam & Katalogtryck AB, Uppsala 2010 Innehåll DANIEL S ÄVBORG, Scripta Islandica 60 . 5 SVANHILDUR Ó SKARSDÓTTIR, To the letter: Philology as a core component of Old Norse studies. 7 JOHN M CKINNELL, Ynglingatal – A minimalist interpretation. 23 LARS L ÖNNROTH, Old Norse text as performance. 49 ELENA G UREVICH, From accusation to narration: The transforma- tion of senna in Íslendingaþættir. 61 THEODORE M. A NDERSSON, The formation of the Kings’ Sagas. 77 HELGI S KÚLI K JARTANSSON, Law recital according to Old Icelandic law: Written evidence of oral transmission? . 89 TERRY G UNNELL, Ansgar’s conversion of Iceland. 105 HELEN F. L ESLIE, Border crossings: Landscape and the Other World in the Fornaldarsögur. 119 TSUKUSU I TÓ, The Gosforth fishing-stone and Hymiskviða: An example of inter-communicability between Old English and Old Norse speakers. 137 Författarna i denna årgång . 159 Scripta Islandica 60 Scripta Islandica fyller sextio år. Jubileet firas med tidskriftens mest in- ternationella nummer hittills. Här finns nio artiklar, åtta av dem skrivna av ickesvenska författare. De kommer från Island, England, USA, Ryss- land och Japan. Några av författarna har länge funnits med inom forsk- ningen, andra är nytillkomna. Theodore Andersson publicerade sin första vetenskapliga artikel 1962, för övrigt också den gången om muntlig tradition i sagalitteraturen, medan Helen Leslie här publicerar sin allra första artikel.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 the Ship Graves on Kormt – and Beyond
    Jan Bill 5 The Ship Graves on Kormt – and Beyond Two of the most significant archaeological monuments on Karmøy are the burials from Storhaug and Grønhaug. Consisting of impressive mounds containing large chamber graves in ships, they belong to the most exclusive and costly group of ritual expressions known from the Viking Age. The two ship graves on Karmøy thus represent persons and politics at the very heart of what made this island an important place in early medieval Scandinavia. This chapter suggests that the majority of monumental burials using the ship allegory were manifestations of a certain ori- gin myth, of which the Danish Skjǫldungar legend is an example, erected as part of the power struggle between ascendant royal families. Archaeological material and written sources are analysed to illuminate the use of ship sym- bolism in monumental burials in and around Scandinavia: large mounds with inhumations or cremations in ships; large ship-shaped stone settings; and written sources from the 10th to the 14th century mentioning ship burials. The archaeological study shows that two different tradi- tions were in use from the late 6th to the late 10th century. One was utilising stone ship settings, at least sometimes in combination with cremations, and was used in southern and eastern Sweden as well as in Denmark. The other, employing inhumation burials in ships, derived from a Scandinavian tradition of placing the deceased in boats for the funerals, but was only developed into a monumental format in East Anglia around 600. From there, it spread to Norway and, to a lesser extent, Denmark in the late 8th–10th centuries.
    [Show full text]