DOCSLIB.ORG

Zoo Time by Howard Jacobson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zoo Time by Howard Jacobson Zoo Time By Howard Jacobson In Brief Winner of the Bollinger Everyman Wodehouse Prize 2013 for comic fiction, the new novel from the author of the Booker prize- winning The Finkler Question In Detail Novelist Guy Ableman is in thrall to his vivacious wife Vanessa, a strikingly beautiful red-head, contrary, highly strung and blazingly angry. The trouble is, he is no less in thrall to her alluring mother, Poppy. More like sisters than mother and daughter, they come as a pair, a blistering presence that destroys Guy's peace of mind, suggesting the wildest stories but making it impossible for him to concentrate long enough to write any of them. Not that anyone reads Guy, anyway. Not that anyone is reading anything. Reading, Guy fears, is finished. His publisher, fearing the same, has committed suicide. His agent, like all agents, is in hiding. Vanessa, in the meantime, is writing a novel of her own. Guy doesn't expect her to finish it, or even start it, but he dreads the consequences if she does. In flight from personal disappointment and universal despair, Guy wonders if it's time to take his love for Poppy to another level. Fiction might be dead, but desire isn't. And out of that desire he imagines squeezing one more great book. By turns angry, elegiac and rude, Zoo Time is a novel about love - love of women, love of literature, love of laughter. It shows our funniest writer at his brilliant best. About the Author An award-winning writer and broadcaster, Howard Jacobson was born in Manchester, brought up in Prestwich and was educated at Stand Grammar School in Whitefield, and Downing College, Cambridge, where he studied under F. R. Leavis. He lectured for three years at the University of Sydney before returning to teach at Selwyn College, Cambridge. His novels include The Mighty Walzer (winner of the Bollinger Everyman Wodehouse Prize), Kalooki Nights (longlisted for the Man Booker Prize), the highly acclaimed The Act of Love, the 2010 Man Booker Prize-winning, The Finkler Question and, most recently, Zoo Time. Howard Jacobson lives in Soho, London. Questions for Discussion 1) ‘He says he didn’t intend to put himself in his novels, and always despised authors who did, but he admits it seems to have ended up that way’ – Lynn Barber, The Sunday Times. ‘She had no feeling for fiction [Mishnah Grunewald]. Who does anymore? She took the ‘I’ in the novel for her and therefore supposed that every thought expressed was intended to be hers.’ – Chapter 3, p.21 How important is our comprehension of the ‘author figure’ in understanding Zoo Time? Discuss in what ways the theme of ‘authorship’ is addressed in the book. 2) ‘‘‘The Mother-in-Law Joke’’ wasn’t going well. I didn’t like my hero Little Gid … He wasn’t the cause of my constipation, he was my constipation. A hero I had to squeeze out of me but who remained resolutely locked inside. What did it say about me? Was I locked inside myself?’ – Chapter 22, p.188 ‘It was fiction, told through the false prism of truth.’ – Chapter 30, p.245 ‘Jacobson’s characters are hard to be around. But this slow and bitter build-up culminates in the final quarter of Zoo Time, where everything speeds up, everybody’s life is changed and a kind of redemption is achieved.’ – Alexei Sayle, The Telegraph With your discussion of Question 1 in mind, discuss how far you think the character of Guy Ableman achieves clarity & resolution through his distortion of truth & fact in his novels. How aware are we that, as a novelist, his tendency to distort the truth affects his first-person narration of events? 3) It was a journey back to more than a previous place, it was a journey back to a previous person. I felt reclaimed, as though Wilmslow knew my secrets and had the power to keep me or let me go.’ –Chapter 24, p.196 How are Landscape, environment and setting used within the prose? Do the characters react differently, or behave differently in the various settings of the book? Did you find it odd that characters always suited or matched their environments? Think about Merton & Elmwyn, and Guy, Vanessa and Poppy’s reactions to Australia, Wilmslow and London. 4) ‘Some time later… I don’t think I need to be specific. Start counting years and all you are measuring is loss. Time passes – let’s leave it at that. Mankind cannot bear too much specify.’ – Chapter 36, p.295 Specific ‘time-frames’ (e.g. ‘Broome 3 years ago’ – Chapter 29, p.238) are rarely given to us in the novel. Time is, more often than not, treated with disregard (‘a month or so later…’ – chapter 30, p.241) and the chronology of the book is sometimes disjointed, often jumping in time frame and location between chapters. How does this affect our reading of the novel? 5) The singular, isolated use of ‘Time Passes’ in the main quote of Question 4 seems like an overt reference to Virginia Woolf’s To The Lighthouse (in which the second of three parts is titled Time Passes). On the dedication page of Zoo Time there is a quote from James Joyce’s Ulysses, another quintessentially modernist text. Considering these references to modernist writers, how could Zoo Time read as a modernist text? As well as the treatment of time, are there other features of the novel that emulate the modernist style? Did you spot any further references to modernist authors in the text? 6) ‘I’m absolutely consumed with fear of death. A lot of my friends have died over the last four or five years. I live in dread of it.’ – Jacobson, speaking to Lynn Barber, The Sunday Times. ‘Metaphorically speaking, at least, we all had pistols in our filing cabinets. Even those publishers who still had writers, even those writers who still had readers, knew the game was up.’ – Chapter 4, p.24 What does the novel have to say about the decline of ‘traditional practices’ & formats in the publishing industry? Think about characters like Merton, Francis, Guy, the ‘distinguished elderly novelist’ (p.158) at the literary festival and Sandy Ferber. Is Zoo Time wholly negative in its appraisal of the emerging, technology-based marketplace for books? In what other ways is the book preoccupied with the themes of death, decay and decline? 7) Is the publishing industry and, in a more general sense, the literary world to which Guy Ableman belongs, depicted as having equal opportunities for men and women? Does the novel present a marginalised view of either sex? Some characters to think about could be Flora McBeth, Francis, Vanessa, Guy, Philippa, Mishnah Grunewald, the Querreys, Sally Comfort, BoBo De Souza (‘Oh, I’m OK…or I will be if you let me borrow your moustache ’ – p.194, Chapter 23). 8) ‘[It’s] the funniest novel I’ve ever written’ – Jacobson, speaking to Lynn Barber, The Sunday Times. ‘[a] seriously funny book.’ – Alexei Sayle, The Telegraph ‘Less focussed and reflective than The Finkler Question, Zoo Time is considerably funnier.’ – David Grylls, The Sunday Times Magazine How funny did you find the novel? What features of Jacobson’s writing style make you laugh hardest? Did, however, you find the book depressing in instances? Does this add to the humour of the novel and do you think this is his funniest work? 9) …My father had asked me if I fancied joining him in a spit roast of my mother. My mother had understood what he meant – which alarmed me – and was only fractionally annoyed… All right, he was senile. But we go senile in a way that reflects our natures. I’d always wondered who my father was. Now I knew. He was a sleazebag…We were sons of a whoremonger, Jeffery Tumour and I. Maybe of a whore as well. We were children of the damned. – Chapter 25, p.217 How do you feel about the representation of ‘family’ in the novel? Is it wholly perverse? You could talk about Guy’s parents, Jeffery, Poppy & Vanessa’s relationship and Guy & Vanessa’s marriage. 10) What did you make of the novel’s enigmatic ending? What did the image represent for you? What could it mean and how does this relate to the novels principle concerns? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University Senate Plenary
    University Senate Plenary September 28, 2018 University Senate Proposed: September 28, 2018 Adopted: PROPOSED AGENDA University Senate Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:15 p.m. Jerome L. Greene Science Center, 9th Floor Lecture Hall (Manhattanville Campus) 1. Adoption of the agenda 2. Adoption of the minutes of April 27, 2018 3. President’s remarks 4. Executive Committee chair’s remarks: a. Summer powers b. Nominations to University Senate committees c. Welcome new senators 5. New business: a. Resolution to establish the Department of African-American and African Diaspora Studies (Education Committee) 6. Committee reports: a. Research Officers Committee b. External Relations and Research Policy Committee c. Alumni Relations Committee d. Housing Policy Committee University Senate Proposed: September 28, 2018 Adopted: MEETING OF APRIL 27, 2018 In President Bollinger’s absence, Executive Committee chair Sharyn O’Halloran called the Senate to order shortly after 1:15 pm in 104 Jerome Greene. Fifty-eight of 99 senators were present during the meeting. Minutes and agenda. The Senate approved the minutes of March 30, 2018, and the agenda without corrections. Executive Committee chair’s remarks. Tributes to two Senate stalwarts. Sen. O’Halloran mentioned two colleagues whose main roles in the Senate were now coming to an end. The first, Howard Jacobson, was stepping down as Senate parliamentarian. Mr. Jacobson, CC 1964, Law ’67, spent a decade in the law firm Kaye Scholer but returned to Columbia in 1979 to spend the rest of his career in the General Counsel’s office. For most of that time, she said, Mr. Jacobson was immersed in the work of the Senate, serving long stints on the Rules and Structure and Operations committees and becoming parliamentarian in the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Left Antisemitism
    “David Hirsh is one of our bravest and most thoughtful scholar-activ- ists. In this excellent book of contemporary history and political argu- ment, he makes an unanswerable case for anti-anti-Semitism.” —Anthony Julius, Professor of Law and the Arts, UCL, and author of Trials of the Diaspora (OUP, 2010) “For more than a decade, David Hirsh has campaigned courageously against the all-too-prevalent demonisation of Israel as the one national- ism in the world that must not only be criticised but ruled altogether illegitimate. This intellectual disgrace arouses not only his indignation but his commitment to gather evidence and to reason about it with care. What he asks of his readers is an equal commitment to plumb how it has happened that, in a world full of criminality and massacre, it is obsessed with the fundamental wrongheadedness of one and only national movement: Zionism.” —Todd Gitlin, Professor of Journalism and Sociology, Columbia University, USA “David Hirsh writes as a sociologist, but much of the material in his fascinating book will be of great interest to people in other disciplines as well, including political philosophers. Having participated in quite a few of the events and debates which he recounts, Hirsh has done a commendable service by deftly highlighting an ugly vein of bigotry that disfigures some substantial portions of the political left in the UK and beyond.” —Matthew H. Kramer FBA, Professor of Legal & Political Philosophy, Cambridge University, UK “A fierce and brilliant rebuttal of one of the Left’s most pertinacious obsessions. What makes David Hirsh the perfect analyst of this disorder is his first-hand knowledge of the ideologies and dogmata that sustain it.” —Howard Jacobson, Novelist and Visiting Professor at New College of Humanities, London, UK “David Hirsh’s new book Contemporary Left Anti-Semitism is an impor- tant contribution to the literature on the longest hatred.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goldsmiths Prize and Its Conceptualization of Experimental Literature
    The Goldsmiths Prize and Its Conceptualization 35 of Experimental Literature The Goldsmiths Prize and Its Conceptualization of Experimental Literature Wojciech Drąg University of Wrocław Abstract: In the aftermath of a critical debate regarding the Man Booker Prize’s adoption of ‘readability’ as the main criterion of literary value, Goldsmiths College established a new literary prize. The Goldsmiths Prize was launched in 2013 as a celebration of ‘fiction that breaks the mould or extends the possibil- ities of the novel form.’ Throughout its six editions, the prize has been awarded to such writers as Ali Smith, Nicola Barker and Eimear McBride, and has at- tracted a lot of media attention. Annually, its jury have written press features praising the shortlisted books, while invited novelists have given lectures on the condition of the novel. Thanks to its quickly won popularity, the Goldsmiths Prize has become the main institution promoting – and conceptualizing – ‘ex- perimental’ fiction in Britain. This article aims to examine all the promotional material accompanying each edition – including jury statements, press releases and commissioned articles in the New Statesman – in order to analyze how the prize defines experimentalism. Keywords: Goldsmiths Prize, literary prizes, experimental literature, avant-gar- de, contemporary British fiction Literary experimentalism is a notion both notoriously difficult to define and generally disliked by those to whose work it is often applied. B.S. Johnson famously stated that ‘to most reviewers [it] is almost always a synonym for “unsuccessful”’ (1973, 19). Among other acclaimed avant-garde authors who defied the label were Raymond Federmann and Ronald Sukenick (Bray, Gib- bon, and McHale 2012, 2-3).
    [Show full text]
  • Interview Summary Sheet Project: Memories of Fiction: an Oral History of Readers’ Lives
    Interview Summary Sheet Project: Memories of Fiction: An Oral History of Readers’ Lives Reference No. Interviewee name and title: Highley, Katherine Interviewee DOB and place of birth: August 1938, Ontario Canada Interviewee Occupation: Retired catering business owner Book group(s) attended: Balham Date(s) of recording: 9 January 2015 Location of recording: Interviewee’s home, Balham, London. Interviewer: Dr. Shelley Trower Duration(s): [01:40:11] Summariser: Haley Moyse Fenning Copyright/Clearance: Interviewer/Summariser comments: 00:57:12 Index of Marcel Proust, Remembrance of Things Past shown to interviewer 01:35:34 Penguin postcards shown to interviewer Key themes: Balham, Reading, book groups, libraries, writing, Russian writers, plays, technology. All books and authors mentioned (those discussed for >20 seconds in bold): Lucy Maud Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables Enid Blyton Johanna Spyri, Heidi Jonathan Swift, Gulliver’s Travels Robert Louis Stevenson, Kidnapped Robert Louis Stevenson, Treasure Island Emily Brontë, Wuthering Heights Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre Charles Dickens Jean Rhys, Wide Sargasso Sea Agatha Christie Raymond Chandler Dashiell Hammett William Shakespeare Anton Chekhov, Three Sisters Fyodor Mikhail Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment Fyodor Mikhail Dostoyevsky, The Brothers Karamazov Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace Leo Tolstoy, Anna Karenina Helen Dunmore, The Siege Aldous Huxley, Brave New World George Orwell, 1984 Margaret Atwood Richard Flanagan, The Narrow Road to the Deep North Natasha Soloman, Mr Rosenblum’s List
    [Show full text]
  • Under Postcolonial Eyes
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters University of Nebraska Press 2013 Under Postcolonial Eyes Efraim Sicher Linda Weinhouse Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples Sicher, Efraim and Weinhouse, Linda, "Under Postcolonial Eyes" (2013). University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters. 138. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples/138 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Nebraska Press at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Under Postcolonial Eyes: Figuring the “jew” in Contemporary British Writing Buy the Book STUDIES IN ANTISEMITISM Vadim Rossman, Russian Intellectual Antisemitism in the Post-Communist Era Anthony D. Kauders, Democratization and the Jews, Munich 1945–1965 Cesare G. DeMichelis, The Non-Existent Manuscript: A Study of the Protocols of the Sages of Zion Robert S. Wistrich, Laboratory for World Destruction: Germans and Jews in Central Europe Graciela Ben-Dror, The Catholic Church and the Jews, Argentina, 1933– 1945 Andrei Oi܈teanu, Inventing the Jew: Antisemitic Stereotypes in Romanian and Other Central-East European Cultures Olaf Blaschke, Offenders or Victims? German Jews and the Causes of Modern Catholic Antisemitism Robert S. Wistrich,
    [Show full text]
  • Addition to Summer Letter
    May 2020 Dear Student, You are enrolled in Advanced Placement English Literature and Composition for the coming school year. Bowling Green High School has offered this course since 1983. I thought that I would tell you a little bit about the course and what will be expected of you. Please share this letter with your parents or guardians. A.P. Literature and Composition is a year-long class that is taught on a college freshman level. This means that we will read college level texts—often from college anthologies—and we will deal with other materials generally taught in college. You should be advised that some of these texts are sophisticated and contain mature themes and/or advanced levels of difficulty. In this class we will concentrate on refining reading, writing, and critical analysis skills, as well as personal reactions to literature. A.P. Literature is not a survey course or a history of literature course so instead of studying English and world literature chronologically, we will be studying a mix of classic and contemporary pieces of fiction from all eras and from diverse cultures. This gives us an opportunity to develop more than a superficial understanding of literary works and their ideas. Writing is at the heart of this A.P. course, so you will write often in journals, in both personal and researched essays, and in creative responses. You will need to revise your writing. I have found that even good students—like you—need to refine, mature, and improve their writing skills. You will have to work diligently at revising major essays.
    [Show full text]
  • Books I've Read Since 2002
    Tracy Chevalier – Books I’ve read since 2002 2019 January The Mars Room Rachel Kushner My Sister, the Serial Killer Oyinkan Braithwaite Ma'am Darling: 99 Glimpses of Princess Margaret Craig Brown Liar Ayelet Gundar-Goshen Less Andrew Sean Greer War and Peace Leo Tolstoy (continued) February How to Own the Room Viv Groskop The Doll Factory Elizabeth Macneal The Cut Out Girl Bart van Es The Gifted, the Talented and Me Will Sutcliffe War and Peace Leo Tolstoy (continued) March Late in the Day Tessa Hadley The Cleaner of Chartres Salley Vickers War and Peace Leo Tolstoy (finished!) April Sweet Sorrow David Nicholls The Familiars Stacey Halls Pillars of the Earth Ken Follett May The Mercies Kiran Millwood Hargraves (published Jan 2020) Ghost Wall Sarah Moss Two Girls Down Louisa Luna The Carer Deborah Moggach Holy Disorders Edmund Crispin June Ordinary People Diana Evans The Dutch House Ann Patchett The Tenant of Wildfell Hall Anne Bronte (reread) Miss Garnet's Angel Salley Vickers (reread) Glass Town Isabel Greenberg July American Dirt Jeanine Cummins How to Change Your Mind Michael Pollan A Month in the Country J.L. Carr Venice Jan Morris The White Road Edmund de Waal August Fleishman Is in Trouble Taffy Brodesser-Akner Kindred Octavia Butler Another Fine Mess Tim Moore Three Women Lisa Taddeo Flaubert's Parrot Julian Barnes September The Nickel Boys Colson Whitehead The Testaments Margaret Atwood Mothership Francesca Segal The Secret Commonwealth Philip Pullman October Notes to Self Emilie Pine The Water Cure Sophie Mackintosh Hamnet Maggie O'Farrell The Country Girls Edna O'Brien November Midnight's Children Salman Rushdie (reread) The Wych Elm Tana French On Earth We're Briefly Gorgeous Ocean Vuong December Olive, Again Elizabeth Strout* Drive Your Plow Over the Bones of the Dead Olga Tokarczuk And Then There Were None Agatha Christie Girl Edna O'Brien My Dark Vanessa Kate Elizabeth Russell *my book of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • SF Commentary 106
    SF Commentary 106 May 2021 80 pages A Tribute to Yvonne Rousseau (1945–2021) Bruce Gillespie with help from Vida Weiss, Elaine Cochrane, and Dave Langford plus Yvonne’s own bibliography and the story of how she met everybody Perry Middlemiss The Hugo Awards of 1961 Andrew Darlington Early John Brunner Jennifer Bryce’s Ten best novels of 2020 Tony Thomas and Jennifer Bryce The Booker Awards of 2020 Plus letters and comments from 40 friends Elaine Cochrane: ‘Yvonne Rousseau, 1987’. SSFF CCOOMMMMEENNTTAARRYY 110066 May 2021 80 pages SF COMMENTARY No. 106, May 2021, is edited and published by Bruce Gillespie, 5 Howard Street, Greensborough, VIC 3088, Australia. Email: [email protected]. Phone: 61-3-9435 7786. .PDF FILE FROM EFANZINES.COM. For both print (portrait) and landscape (widescreen) editions, go to https://efanzines.com/SFC/index.html FRONT COVER: Elaine Cochrane: Photo of Yvonne Rousseau, at one of those picnics that Roger Weddall arranged in the Botanical Gardens, held in 1987 or thereabouts. BACK COVER: Jeanette Gillespie: ‘Back Window Bright Day’. PHOTOGRAPHS: Jenny Blackford (p. 3); Sally Yeoland (p. 4); John Foyster (p. 8); Helena Binns (pp. 8, 10); Jane Tisell (p. 9); Andrew Porter (p. 25); P. Clement via Wikipedia (p. 46); Leck Keller-Krawczyk (p. 51); Joy Window (p. 76); Daniel Farmer, ABC News (p. 79). ILLUSTRATION: Denny Marshall (p. 67). 3 I MUST BE TALKING TO MY FRIENDS, PART 1 34 TONY THOMAS TO MY FRIENDS, PART 1 THE BOOKER PRIZE 2020 READING EXPERIENCE 3, 7 41 JENNIFER BRYCE A TRIBUTE TO YVONNNE THE 2020 BOOKER PRIZE
    [Show full text]
  • The Revival of the Satiric Spirit in Contemporary British Fiction1
    The Revival of the Satiric Spirit in Contemporary British Fiction1 Luis Alberto Lázaro Lafuente University of Alcalá Satiric novels have traditionally been regarded as a minor form by many critics and scholars. Aristotle had already referred to the satirists as "the more trivial" poets who wrote about the actions of meaner~persons, in stark contrast to the "more serious-minded" epic poets who represented noble actions and the lives of noble people (1965: 35-36). This attitude has persisted throughout many centuries in the history of English literature. Even though satire enjoyed its golden age in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, especially with the poetry of such distinguished writers as Dryden or Pope, satiric compositions in prose did not really achieve the same high position2• When with time the novel became a well• established genre, it was mainly naturalistic fiction and psychological stories that commonly attained a prominent status among the literary critics, whereas the comic and satiric novel, with a few exceptions, was relegated to a status of popular prose on the fringe of the canon, or even outside it. Indeed, in the twentieth century, several prestigious authors have offered a rather gloomy picture of the state of novelistic satire. Robert C. Elliott, for instance, said in 1960 that the great literary figures of this century were not "preeminently satirists" (1970: 223); and Patricia Meyer Spacks, in her artide "Some Reflections on Satire" first published in 1968, even stated that satiric novel s by authors such I Some ideas oí this paper have already appeared in my essay "El espíritu satírico en la novela británica contemporánea: Menipo redivivo", included in the volume edited by Fernando Galván Már• genes y centros en la literatura británica actual.
    [Show full text]
  • Allende Amis Atwood Austen Barnes
    ALLENDE AMIS ATWOOD AUSTEN BARNES BARRY BINET BOLAÑO BORGES BULGAKOV BURNSIDE BYATT CALVINO CARROLL CARTER CARVER CHANG CHATWIN COETZEE CONRAD DARWIN De BERNIÈRES DE WAAL DIAMOND DI LAMPEDUSA DICKENS DOSTOEVSKY DOYLE ECO ENRIGHT FAULKNER FAULKS FIELDING FITZGERALD FOULDS FOWLES GIBBONS GRASS GREENE GROSSMAN HADDON HELLER HIGHSMITH HOUELLEBECQ HUXLEY ISHERWOOD JACOBSON JOHNSON JONES JOYCE KAFKA KENNEDY KNAUSGAARD KUSHNER LEE LENNON MAK MARÍAS MATTHIESSEN MAXWELL McCARTHY McEWAN MISHIMA MORRISON MUNRO MURAKAMI MURDOCH NADAS NÉMIROVSKY NIFFENEGGER OGAWA ONDAATJE OZ PASTERNAK PENROSE PEREC PETTERSON POLITKOVSKAYA PROUST PYNCHON REMARQUE RIVAS ROTH RUSHDIE SARAMAGO SCHAMA SEBALD SHUTE SNYDER SOLZHENITSYN STEVENSON STYRON TAN TANIZAKI Thiong’o THIRLWELL TVINTAGEHORPE BOOKS THU CATALOGUEBRON TOLSTOY TREMAIN TJULY–DECEMBERYLER VARGAS 2020 VONNEGUT WARHOL WELSH WESLEY WHEELER WIGGINS WILLIAMS WINTERSON WOLFE WOOLF WYLD YATES ZOLA ALLENDE AMIS ATWOOD AUSTEN BARNES BARRY BINET BOLAÑO BORGES BULGAKOV BURNSIDE BYATT CALVINO CARROLL CARTER CARVER CHANG CHATWIN COETZEE CONRAD DARWIN De BERNIÈRES DE WAAL DIAMOND DI LAMPEDUSA DICKENS DOSTOEVSKY DOYLE ECO ENRIGHT FAULKNER FAULKS FIELDING FITZGERALD FOULDS FOWLES GIBBONS GRASS GREENE GROSSMAN HADDON HELLER HIGHSMITH HOUELLEBECQ HUXLEY ISHERWOOD JACOBSON JOHNSON JONES JOYCE KAFKA KENNEDY KNAUSGAARD KUSHNER LEE LENNON MAK MARÍAS MATTHIESSEN MAXWELL McCARTHY McEWAN MISHIMA MORRISON MUNRO MURAKAMI MURDOCH NADAS NÉMIROVSKY NIFFENEGGER OGAWA ONDAATJE OZ PASTERNAK PENROSE PEREC PETTERSON POLITKOVSKAYA PROUST PYNCHON REMARQUE RIVAS ROTH RUSHDIE SARAMAGO SCHAMA SEBALD SHUTE SNYDER SOLZHENITSYN STEVENSON STYRON TAN TANIZAKI Thiong’o THIRLWELL TBODLEYHORPE HEAD THUBRON TOLSTOY TREMAIN TJULY–DECEMBERYLER VARGAS 2020 VONNEGUT WARHOL WELSH WESLEY WHEELER WIGGINS WILLIAMS WINTERSON WOLFE WOOLF WYLD YATES ZOLA Why We Drive On Freedom, Risk and Taking Back Control Matthew Crawford Why We Drive is about the defining question of our times: who is really in control? Driving requires some of our most important abilities and liberties.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT of a STRATEGIC PLAN for MLF (Freelance Contract)
    DEVELOPMENT OF A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR MLF (Freelance Contract) Manchester Literature Festival is seeking a consultant(s) to develop a strategic plan that builds on the organisation’s achievements and aspirations to guide the Festival’s development over the next 5 years. Manchester Literature Festival (MLF) was established in 2006 and provides unique and imaginative opportunities for audiences to experience high quality live literature. It has established itself as one of the most imaginative and highly regarded festivals in the UK’s cultural calendar. A firm believer in the transformative power of words and stories, MLF showcases and commissions some of the most interesting voices in fiction, poetry, literature in translation, song-writing, activism and culture. Featuring both established and emerging writers, the Festival provides a platform for women writers, LGBTQ+ writers, working class writers and writers of colour to reflect the rich diversity of Manchester. Having grown out of the Manchester Poetry Festival, MLF has tripled in size attracting an audience of 13,000+ to annual 16--day festivals featuring 75+ events. Due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, we produced a scaled down, digital iteration of the Festival in October 2020. #MLF20 comprised 17 events featuring high profile authors, poets, artists and activists from across the globe, including conversations with Tori Amos, Angela Davis, Nick Hornby, Maaza Mengiste and Kae Tempest. It attracted an audience of 5000 people from 53 countries. As well as presenting an annual Festival and Spring programme of live literature events, MLF also produces a year-round education programme which engages children, young people and their families in creative activities, specifically targeted in areas of the city where there is a low level of cultural engagement and high levels of child poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Man Booker Prize Shortlist Celebrating Five Decades of the Finest Fiction
    Press release Under embargo until 6.30pm, Saturday 26 May 2018 Golden Man Booker Prize shortlist Celebrating five decades of the finest fiction www.themanbookerprize.com| #ManBooker50 The shortlist for the Golden Man Booker Prize was announced today (Saturday 26 May) during a reception at the Hay Festival. This special one-off award for Man Booker Prize’s 50th anniversary celebrations will crown the best work of fiction from the last five decades of the prize. All 51 previous winners were considered by a panel of five specially appointed judges, each of whom was asked to read the winning novels from one decade of the prize’s history. We can now reveal that that the ‘Golden Five’ – the books thought to have best stood the test of time – are: In a Free State by V. S. Naipaul; Moon Tiger by Penelope Lively; The English Patient by Michael Ondaatje; Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel; and Lincoln in the Bardo by George Saunders. Judge Year Title Author Country Publisher of win Robert 1971 In a Free V. S. Naipaul UK Picador McCrum State Lemn Sissay 1987 Moon Penelope Lively UK Penguin Tiger Kamila 1992 The Michael Canada Bloomsbury Shamsie English Ondaatje Patient Simon Mayo 2009 Wolf Hall Hilary Mantel UK Fourth Estate Hollie 2017 Lincoln George USA Bloomsbury McNish in the Saunders Bardo Key dates 26 May to 25 June Readers are now invited to have their say on which book is their favourite from this shortlist. The month-long public vote on the Man Booker Prize website will close on 25 June.
    [Show full text]