DOCSLIB.ORG

The President's News Conference with Prime Minister Tony Blair Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The President's News Conference with Prime Minister Tony Blair Of Jan. 31 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 Uganda’s Ambassador to the U.S.; Anthony tutes of Health; and Father Edward Phillips, S. Fauci, Director, National Institute of Al- chairperson, Eastern Deanery CBHC and lergy and Infectious Disease, National Insti- AIDS Relief Program. The President’s News Conference With Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United Kingdom January 31, 2003 President Bush. It’s my honor to wel- that these twin threats that the world faces come Tony Blair back to the White House. are dealt with. And I have no doubt at We just had a wide-ranging discussion on all that we can deal with them. But we a lot of issues. I appreciate my friend’s should realize those two threats, terrorism, commitment to peace and security. I appre- weapons of mass destruction, are not dif- ciate his vision. I appreciate his willingness ferent; they’re linked. And dealing with to lead. Most importantly, I appreciate his both of them is essential for the future understanding that after September the peace and security and prosperity of the 11th, 2001, the world changed, that we face world. a common enemy, terrorists willing to kill Thank you. innocent lives, that we now recognize that President Bush. Fournier [Ron Fournier, threats which gather in remote regions of Associated Press]. Here’s what we’re going the world must be dealt with before others to do. I will call upon a reporter. The lose their lives. Prime Minister will call upon a reporter. Tony Blair is a friend. He’s a friend of And we’ll do this three different times. the American people. He’s a friend of Start with you. mine. I trust his judgment, and I appreciate his wisdom. Timetable for Action/U.N. Resolution 1441 Welcome. Q. Thank you, sir. First, quickly to the Prime Minister Blair. First of all, can Prime Minister, did you ask President Bush I say how delighted I am to be back in to secure a second U.N. resolution and to the White House and to see President give the inspectors more time? And Presi- Bush. And as he’s just described to you, dent Bush, the U.N. says—the U.N. inspec- we had an excellent discussion, covering all tors say Saddam is not complying; you say the key issues of the day. And I would Saddam is not complying. Why wait a mat- like to praise his leadership in the world ter of weeks? What’s—why hold up on the since September the 11th, particularly on decision? what I think are the two key issues that President Bush. First of all, you violated face our world today, which are issues of the two-question rule—as usual. He’s had international terrorism and weapons of a bad habit of this. I’ll start. mass destruction. And I think both of those Saddam Hussein is not disarming. He is issues come together because they threaten a danger to the world. He must disarm. the peace and the order and the stability And that’s why I have constantly said and of the world. the Prime Minister has constantly said this And what is essential is that in every issue will come to a head in a matter of respect, in every way that we can, we mobi- weeks, not months. lize international support and the inter- Prime Minister Blair. The whole point national community in order to make sure about the present situation is that when 114 Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 / Jan. 31 President Bush made his speech to the United Nations stand up as a body and United Nations, when we went down the show the world that it has got the capacity United Nations route, we passed Resolution to keep the peace?’’ 1441. And I think it really repays reading So, first of all, in answer to one part that, because we said very clearly that Sad- of your question, is this needs to be re- dam had what we said was a final oppor- solved quickly. Should the United Nations tunity to disarm and that he had to cooper- decide to pass a second resolution, it would ate fully in every respect with the U.N. be welcomed if it is yet another signal that weapons inspectors. we’re intent upon disarming Saddam Hus- As Dr. Blix said in his report to the sein. But 1441 gives us the authority to Security Council earlier this week, he’s not move without any second resolution. And doing that. And therefore, what is impor- Saddam Hussein must understand that if tant is that the international community he does not disarm, for the sake of peace, comes together again and makes it abso- we, along with others, will go disarm Sad- lutely clear that this is unacceptable. And dam Hussein. the reason why I believe that it will do Steve [Steve Holland, Reuters]. that is precisely because in the original Res- olution 1441, we made it clear that failure Secretary Powell’s Upcoming U.N. Visit to disarm would lead to serious con- sequences. Q. Thank you, sir. Mr. President, is Sec- So this is a test for the international com- retary Powell going to provide the undeni- munity. It’s not just a test for the United able proof of Iraq’s guilt that so many crit- States or for Britain. It’s a test for the ics are calling for? international community, too. And the judg- President Bush. Well, all due in modesty, ment has to be, at the present time, that I thought I did a pretty good job myself Saddam Hussein is not cooperating with of making it clear that he’s not disarming the inspectors and, therefore, is in breach and why he should disarm. Secretary Pow- of the U.N. resolution. And that’s why time ell will make a strong case about the danger is running out. of an armed Saddam Hussein. He will Andy. make it clear that Saddam Hussein is fool- Q. Andrew Marr, from the BBC. A ques- ing the world or trying to fool the world. tion for the President, if I may. What is He will make it clear that Saddam is a the status, in your view, of any second reso- menace to peace in his own neighborhood. lution? Is it something that you think it’s He will also talk about Al Qaida links, links worth spending time and energy trying to that really do portend a danger for America assemble and, if so, why? and for Great Britain—anybody else who President Bush. First, let me reiterate loves freedom. what I just said. This is a matter of weeks, As the Prime Minister says, the war on not months. Any attempt to drag the proc- terror is not confined to just a shadowy ess on for months will be resisted by the terrorist network. The war on terror in- United States. And as I understand the cludes people who are willing to train and Prime Minister—I’m loath to put words in to equip organizations such as Al Qaida. his mouth—but he’s also said weeks, not See, the strategic view of America months. changed after September the 11th. We Secondly, I want to remind you, I was must deal with threats before they hurt the the guy that went to the United Nations American people again. And as I have said in the first place. I said, ‘‘Why don’t we repeatedly, Saddam Hussein would like come together as a world to resolve this nothing more than to use a terrorist net- issue, once and for all? Why doesn’t the work to attack and to kill and leave no 115 Jan. 31 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 fingerprints behind. Colin Powell will con- disarm in front of inspectors. We know tinue making that case to the American what a disarmed regime looks like. We people and the world at the United Na- know what it means to disarm. There’s no tions. negotiations. The idea of calling inspectors Prime Minister Blair. Adam. in to negotiate is a charade. If he is going to disarm, he must start disarming. That’s Iraq and Terrorists the only thing he needs to talk to the in- Q. Adam Boulton, Sky News. One ques- spectors about, is, ‘‘Here. I’m disarming.’’ tion for you both. Do you believe that there Prime Minister Blair. That’s absolutely is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct right. If you look back at the history of link, and the men who attacked on Sep- this, for 12 years, he’s played these games. tember the 11th? And that’s why it’s so important to realize President Bush. I can’t make that claim. what the U.N. inspectors were put back Prime Minister Blair. That answers your in to do. The U.N. inspectors—and this question. The one thing I would say, how- is the crucial point, because it’s on this ever, is I’ve absolutely no doubt at all that basis that the whole issue of the U.N. au- unless we deal with both of these threats, thority rests—the U.N. inspectors did not they will come together in a deadly form. go back into Iraq to play a game of hide- Because, you know, what do we know after and-seek with Saddam. They didn’t go back September the 11th? We know that these in as a detective agency.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The President's News Conference with Prime Minister Tony Blair Of
    Nov. 19 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 your home. Through the last century and and British servicemembers are sacrificing into our own, Americans have appreciated in a necessary and noble cause. Once again, the friendship of your people. And we are we are acting to secure the peace of the grateful for your personal commitment world. across five decades to the health and vitality The bonds between our countries were of the alliance between our nations. formed in hard experience. We passed Of course, things didn’t start out too through great adversity together. We have well. [Laughter] Yet, even at America’s risen through great challenges together. founding, our nations shared a basic belief The mutual respect and fellowship between in human liberty. That conviction more our countries is deep and strong and per- than anything else led to our reconciliation. manent. And in time, our shared commitment to Let us raise our glasses to our common freedom became the basis of a great Atlan- ideals, to our enduring friendships, to the tic alliance that defeated tyranny in Europe preservation of our liberties, and to Her and saved the liberty of the world. Majesty, the Queen of the United Kingdom The story of liberty, the story of the of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Magna Carta and the Declaration of Inde- pendence, continues in our time. The NOTE: The President spoke at 8:49 p.m. in power of freedom has touched Asia and the Ballroom at Buckingham Palace. In his Latin America and Africa and beyond. And remarks, he referred to Prince Philip, Duke now our two countries are carrying out a of Edinburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Number 374 11 March 2019
    Issue 374 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 11 March 2019 Issue number 374 11 March 2019 Issue 374 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 11 March 2019 Contents Introduction 3 Note to Broadcasters 4 Broadcast Standards cases In Breach News Cool FM / Downtown Radio, 18 June 2017, 16:00 7 Headline News That’s Manchester, 8 August 2018, 00:00 10 Resolved Football League: Sheffield United v Sheffield Wednesday Sky Sports Main Event, 9 November 2018, 19:47 14 Six Nations: Ireland v England Live ITV, 2 February 2019, 16:00 17 Broadcast Fairness and Privacy cases Not Upheld Complaint by Ms Shadi Danin, made on her behalf by Mrs Susan Fleet Can’t Pay? We’ll Take It Away!, Channel 5, 20 August 2017 19 Tables of cases Investigations Not in Breach 28 Complaints assessed, not investigated 29 Complaints outside of remit 39 BBC First 41 Investigations List 43 Issue 374 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 11 March 2019 Introduction Under the Communications Act 2003 (“the Act”), Ofcom has a duty to set standards for broadcast content to secure the standards objectives1. Ofcom also has a duty to ensure that On Demand Programme Services (“ODPS”) comply with certain standards requirements set out in the Act2. Ofcom reflects these requirements in its codes and rules. The Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin reports on the outcome of Ofcom’s investigations into alleged breaches of its codes and rules, as well as conditions with which broadcasters licensed by Ofcom are required to comply. The codes and rules include: a) Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code (“the Code”) for content broadcast on television and radio services licensed by Ofcom, and for content on the BBC’s licence fee funded television, radio and on demand services.
    [Show full text]
  • TV Leaders' Debates
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 5241 , 14 October 2020 By Neil Johnston and TV leaders' debates Hazel Armstrong Contents: 1. Background 2. 2010 General Election 3. 2015 General Election 4. 2017 General Election 5. 2019 General Election 6. Do we need a Debates Commission? www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 TV leaders' debates Contents Summary 3 1. Background 5 2. 2010 General Election 8 2.1 Initial proposals 8 2.2 2010 agreement 8 2.3 The 2010 debates 10 3. 2015 General Election 14 3.1 The initial proposals 14 3.2 House of Commons debate on 11 March 2015 18 3.3 Ofcom’s consultation on party election broadcasts for ‘major parties’ 20 3.4 The 2015 debates 21 4. 2017 General Election 24 5. 2019 General Election 27 6. Do we need a Debates Commission? 32 6.1 E-petition calling for an Independent Debates Commission 35 6.2 Do they make any difference? 37 Appendix A – Key principles – 2010 debates 39 Appendix B – Programme format – 2010 debates 41 Cover page image copyright: Flickr image Parliament Week welcomes BBC Question Time to Westminster Hall Parliamentary copyright/Catherine Bebbington. NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0) 3 Commons Library Briefing, 14 October 2019 Summary Televised election debates between party leaders took place during the 2010, 2015, 2017 and 2019 Parliamentary general elections campaigns. During the 2019 campaign there were, for the first time, two head-to- head debates between Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the Leader of the Opposition, Jeremy Corbyn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Television Election?
    Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 63 No. 4, 2010, 802–817 The Media and the 2010 Campaign: the Television Election? BY DOMINIC WRING AND STEPHEN WARD ABSTRACT Downloaded from The 2010 election was one of the most competitive campaigns of recent decades. The first televised leaders’ debates along with the rise of online social networking led to renewed speculation about the potential influence of the media in cam- paigns. By contrast the press appeared to revert to pre mid-1990s form with strong support for the Conservatives and personal attacks on their opponents. This article concentrates on three main areas: the influence of the leaders debates on the cam- http://pa.oxfordjournals.org/ paign and outcome of the election; whether and how press endorsements made much difference; and finally, the hype surrounding the notion of an internet elec- tion and whether e-campaigning made any difference to the campaign. at University of North Dakota on July 12, 2015 IT IS something of a cliche´ to say that the media play a major role in modern general elections but this was particularly the case during the 2010 campaign. From the broadcasting perspective, interest focused on what influence the first televised leaders debates might have on the for- tunes of the parties and the campaign generally—how far would this result in a further presidentialisation of campaigning and would any particular party/leader benefit? In relation to the oldest news medium—the press—interest centred on whether endorsement of the Conservatives by the Sun would make any difference and, more gener- ally, whether newspapers were of declining significance in a multi- media age? At the outset of the election, much speculation centred on the Internet, notably how prominent and important would social net- working tools, such as Twitter and Facebook, be in the course of the campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the UK Television News Industry 1982 - 1998
    -iì~ '1,,J C.12 The Development of the UK Television News Industry 1982 - 1998 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Alison Preston Deparent of Film and Media Studies University of Stirling July 1999 Abstract This thesis examines and assesses the development of the UK television news industry during the period 1982-1998. Its aim is to ascertain the degree to which a market for television news has developed, how such a market operates, and how it coexists with the 'public service' goals of news provision. A major purpose of the research is to investigate whether 'the market' and 'public service' requirements have to be the conceptual polarities they are commonly supposed to be in much media academic analysis of the television news genre. It has conducted such an analysis through an examination of the development strategies ofthe major news organisations of the BBC, ITN and Sky News, and an assessment of the changes that have taken place to the structure of the news industry as a whole. It places these developments within the determining contexts of Government economic policy and broadcasting regulation. The research method employed was primarily that of the in-depth interview with television news management, politicians and regulators: in other words, those instrumental in directing the strategic development within the television news industry. Its main findings are that there has indeed been a development of market activity within the television news industry, but that the amount of this activity has been limited by the particular economic attributes of the television news product.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Watch: Media Notes on #GE2015
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2015/05/05/election-watch-notes-on-ge2015/ Election Watch: Media Notes on #GE2015 I am tediously optimistic, but as Britain goes to the polls I feel depressed about every likely outcome. (6.5.15) This will not be a decisive election and I fear that out of the chaos will come, well… more confusion. I am not against coalition government in principle and I instinctively welcome the idea of more plural politics. I would love to see the self-indulgent wishfulness of nationalism (SNP, Ukip) and lifestyle idealism (Green Party) exposed to more rigourous scrutiny and the test of having to be engaged in gritty decision-making. They might inject some fertility into the near-moribund anatomy of the main political parties. But here’s the downside. Firstly, as a media person I am so bored by the tight-arsed failure of the parties to embrace the possibilities of digital media — but also mainstream media — to have a full, frank and entertaining debate about politics. It’s been a dull, stupid, bland, campaign. The broadcasters have been slavishly compliant in the relentless photo- opportunities, too lazy even to go for the odd wide shot to expose the visual chicanery involved. The faked moonlanding conspiracy has nothing on this election. Secondly, I share the view of people like Andrew Marr, Adam Boulton and Martin Wolf that the big issues have been ignored. Not just in the avoidance of detail. The Tories won’t tell us the welfare cuts to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam Boulton, Sky News Political Editor
    Adam Boulton, Political Editor, Sky News Adam Boulton was a founding member of the Sky News team. He was invited to set up the Sky political team, which pioneered innovative use of live analysis and pictures. Since those early days it is reckoned that he has spent more hours covering breaking stories than any other British television reporter. In 2002 Adam won the prestigious Judge's Award at the Royal Television Society journalism awards ceremony. Previously TV-am's Political Editor, Adam has been a member of the Parliamentary Lobby for twenty years. He has fronted a wide variety of programmes from his Millbank base in the very heart of Westminster. He presents the Sky News flagship current affairs programme Sunday with Adam Boulton which provides an in-depth analysis of the week's news. Adam's also enjoys the extended interview format - Tony Blair, John Major, Margaret Thatcher, Al Gore, Lech Walesa and President Hosni Mubarak are among an illustrious list of political guests who have appeared with him. Adam's interests are wide-ranging and his One on One interviews over the years have also included many stars from film, television, theatre and music. Adam presented Sky News PMQs programme until the recent changes in the parliamentary schedule. He has also taken his current affairs road show, Forum, around the country and as far afield as Israel and the United States. Adam passionately believes that the role of a 24-hour television news channel is to break news. In 1995 he was the only journalist to predict live, and then report John Major's leadership resignation.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Prime Ministerial Debate 22 April 2010
    Second prime ministerial debate 22 April 2010 TRANSCRIPT 1 ADAM BOULTON: Good evening from the Arnolfini in Bristol and welcome to the Sky News leaders' debate, round two of the first ever televised prime ministerial debates in the UK. The three men who want to run the country after May 6th are here and raring to go, so please welcome David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Gordon Brown. APPLAUSE ADAM BOULTON: The agreed theme for the first half of this debate is international affairs. Each leader will make a short opening statement before taking questions from the audience. In the second half tonight, we'll move on to general issues. Lots have been drawn to decide who goes first. We begin with the current Prime Minister and leader of the Labour Party, Gordon Brown. Mr Brown. GORDON BROWN: This may have the feel of a TV popularity contest, but in truth, this is an election about Britain's future, a fight for your future, and for your jobs. If it's all about style and PR, count me out. If it's about the big decisions, if it's about judgment, it's delivering a better future for this country, I'm your man. Ahead are huge challenges, delivering the economic recovery in jobs, bringing our brave troops safely home from Afghanistan, keeping our streets free of terrorism, building alliances in Europe against nuclear weapons, against climate change, against poverty and to deal with our banks. Now, not everyone has the answers, but I say get the big decisions wrong and Britain's security and jobs are at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005-Pages.Pdf
    THE GENERALELECTION ELECTION 2005 ThursdayI Men about the They're the ones who usually ask the questions. This time it's us. Do TV's top political pundits think the election will get us tuning in? Has the election become a bit of a I blame the story. The main reason turn-off? Why should we switch on? for apathy is when voters feel that Andrew Marr (BBC): Because you either the outcome of the election is don't know the result. This election not going to make much difference to depends on how many people them, or they feel they can't make decide to vote. In 2001 we had one much difference to the outcome of of the lowest turnouts in Britain's the election because the result is a democratic history [see panel foregone conclusion. opposite]. This time it could go The best turnout recently was in considerably lower - and if it does 1992, and - guess what - that was a we'll see some very strange results close election. [John Major won a indeed. I talk to a lot of politicians, fourth consecutive Tory victory with and they all say it's weird out there. a 65-seat majority.] Nick Robinson (ITV): I agree. We Robinson: I agree. We shouldn't don't know whether the polls are assume that turnout will go down. right; we don't know how turnout It may not. will affect the result. If Blair is re-elected, the size of his majority If turnout does qo down, will will determine how long he can you be blaming yourselves for stay in office.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing in the 2010 British General Election - Perspectives, Prospect and Practice
    Journal of Marketing Management, Volume 27, Number 7–8, July 2011, Pages 647–655 Marketing in the 2010 British General Election - Perspectives, Prospect and Practice Guest Editors: Dr Paul Baines, Cranfield School of Management and Professor Phil Harris, University of Chester Abstract This editorial article discusses how televised debates transformed the British General Election campaign of 2010 and impacted upon political leader standing in the election. Papers are introduced in a number of areas including political branding, analysis of attack advertising and its implications, channel experience effectiveness measurement, consumption and co-creation in the sensitive policy area of immigration, the Europeanisation of British political marketing, and how UK expatriates could be targeted by political parties. In addition, we consider continuing gaps in political marketing research including ethical considerations, the application of frameworks from social and not-for-profit marketing and the link between lobbying and political marketing. Keywords: political marketing, British general election 2010, prime ministerial debates Perspectives: Background to the Campaign In this Special Issue of the Journal of Marketing Management, we seek to outline the story behind a remarkable regime change in the UK political landscape that saw the first coalition government come to power for more than 60 years. Table 1 outlines the formal period of the election campaign in the 2010 British general election and highlights key moments in the campaign. It particularly highlights the importance of the three main TV debates, but also other potentially pivotal moments such as the launch of the party manifestos and the only really significant unscripted event in the campaign, the moment when Gordon Brown called Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • PSA Awards 2010
    AWARD WINNERS TUESDAY 30 NOVEMBER 2010 One Great George Street, London SW1P 3AA THE AWARDS Politician of Year 2010..................................................................3 Lifetime Achievement in Politics ..............................................5 Parliamentarian .............................................................................7 Setting the Political Agenda .......................................................9 Political Journalist.......................................................................11 Broadcast Journalist ..................................................................12 Special ‘Engaging the Public’ Award .......................................13 Best Political Satire.....................................................................14 Lifetime Achievement in Political Studies............................16 Politics/Political Studies Communicator .............................19 Sir Isaiah Berlin Prize for Lifetime Contribution to Political Studies ..........................................................................20 Best book in British political studies 1950-2010 ...............21 W. J. M. MacKenzie Prize 2010 .................................................22 ANNUAL AWARD POLITICIAN OF YEAR 2010 This is an award for domestic politicians who have made a significant impact in 2010. Any person elected for political office in the UK can be considered. The Judges Say described him as “one of the ablest” Despite the inconclusive outcome of the students he has taught. 2010 general
    [Show full text]