THE USE of a MULTIMEDIA PERSONAL TOXIC EXPOSURE for ASSESSMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS in CHILDREN (The Example of Pervouralsk)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE USE of a MULTIMEDIA PERSONAL TOXIC EXPOSURE for ASSESSMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS in CHILDREN (The Example of Pervouralsk) THE USE OF A MULTIMEDIA PERSONAL TOXIC EXPOSURE FOR ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS IN CHILDREN (the example of Pervouralsk) S.V. Kuzmin1, E.A. Kuzmina1, V.B. Gurvich2, S.A. Voronin2, L.I. Privalova3, G.V. Matyukhina2 1 Ekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers of Rospotrebnadzor 2 Sverdlovsk Regional Agency of the Federal Service for Surveillance in the Sphere of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare 3 The Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology in the Sverdlovsk Region, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation The exposure assessment on the population level is not only averaged for sufficiently large groups and areas within which is varies significantly but is often incomplete because it does not consider indoor concentrations of chemicals in residential and public buildings that significantly depend on some local factors. Children spend their time in different microenvironments (at home, in the kindergarten, transport, shops, in the street, etc.). The soil and dust exposure is especially relevant for children due to their behavioral habits and inadequate hygienic skills. The studies showed that preschool children spend almost 80% of time indoors. Without establishing the qualitative and quantitative composition of pollutants in microenvironments it is impossible to make a reliable assessment of the personal exposure to the pollutants and to substantiate the most effective measures of its reduction. The goal of work was to assess a multimedia personal exposure of preschool children to pollutants with account for the time spent in various microenvironments and the lifestyle, to evaluate the contribution of contamination of these microenvironments in the total chemical load in order to choose priority measures of environmental risk management on the population and personal levels. The work was done in 2003-2008 and covered 287 children aged 3-7 in seven towns of the Sverdlovsk Region (Ekaterinburg, Pervouralsk, Krasnoturyinsk, Revda, Nizhni Tagil, Verkhnyaya Pyshma, and Krasnouralsk) that are big industrial centers with developed ferrous and nonferrous industries, aluminum production, machine building, heavy traffic and industrially polluted environment. Concentrations of pollutants (nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, formaldehyde, volatile organic compounds, suspended particles, lead, chromium, copper, cadmium, nickel, arsenic, zinc, aluminum, and manganese) in the air (in the breathing zone, the ambient air, indoor air in residences and kindergartens) were measured using personal samplers made in the USA, Japan and Russia. To assess the multimedia toxic load we also established concentrations of toxic metals in soil in the garden and the playground of kindergartens, in vegetables grown in private grounds, in drinking water, in dust sampled from the carpeting and the floor at home and in the kindergarten. The time study was conducted and the parents were asked to fill out a questionnaire. Here, as an example, we present the results obtained in the town of Pervouralsk. The time study showed that, on the average, the children spent 6.7% of time in the street, 32.0% - in kindergartens, and 59.0% - at home; and also 1.5% of time – indoors in other places including schools of development, shops, etc., 0.8% - in transport. The contribution of indoor air at home in the time-weighed average concentrations estimated based on average results for air of three microenvironments and the average time spent in them, was the highest in respect of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde, of indoor air in kindergartens – sulfur dioxide, and the contribution of ambient air was the lowest for all three pollutants (the latter was, probably, due to the short time of stay out of doors). All concentrations of volatile organic compounds established by personal sampling and also in the ambient air, in the indoor air in kindergartens and homes were significantly lower than the maximum permissible concentrations. Higher concentrations of all VOCs were found in indoor air in residences. Concentrations of other pollutants in the ambient air and indoor air in kindergartens did not exceed the corresponding maximum permissible average daily concentrations either. The analysis of concentrations of toxicants in vegetables grown in private gardens of families of the children under study showed that concentrations of cadmium in beet were 2.6 times, and in carrot – 1.3-1.7 times higher than the permissible level. Concentrations of contaminants in other studied vegetables (potato, cabbage) were within the permitted limits. Based on data on averaging concentrations of the studied toxicants in soils where the vegetables were grown, the concentration of zinc was 1.3 times higher than the maximum permissible level. In the soil of the playground in the kindergarten the concentration of zinc was 1.6 times higher than the permissible level. The evaluation of pollutants in dust sampled in kindergartens and in home dust showed that the added toxic load on children was due to high concentrations of heavy metals. Concentrations of lead, cadmium and chromium in dust were significantly higher than in soil. That could be explained by the presence of local industrial sources of emission of those chemicals. The levels of other metals in soil and dust were comparable or higher in soils. Concentrations of toxicants in drinking water consumed by children did not exceed maximum permissible concentrations. The contribution of the studied environmental media in the total toxic load was assessed for each child. Here we present some results that characterize possible health risk factors obtained based on the questionnaire data. 66.6% of children were born in Pervouralsk. 94.4% of those children lived in panel or block houses. 94,4% of flats where the children lived had windows facing the street. Gas was used for cooking in 100% of flats while the exhaust ventilation from the gas stove was arranged only in 16.7% of flats. 33% of families used tap water from the central water supply system for drinking. Floors were washed once a day in 33% of families, and once a week – in 67% of flats. In 61.1% of families somebody smoked cigarettes every day in the permanent residence of the child. The average number of cigarettes smoked a day was 13. Pets were in 44% of families (fish, cats, dogs, birds, turtles and rodents). The correlation analysis helped reveal statistically significant correlations between the personal inhalation exposure to formaldehyde and decorations in the flat in the previous 12 months; between the personal exposure to nitrogen dioxide and the gas stove in the kitchen; between concentrations of sulfur dioxide, trichloroethylene established during the personal monitoring and the floor of living (4-7 and above); between the exposure to formaldehyde and windows facing the traffic road in the flat. The results show that the main inhalation exposure of children to nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, formaldehyde, and volatile organic compounds took place indoors. High concentrations of heavy metals were found in dust samples taken from horizontal surfaces including carpeting. We also found lots of polymer and synthetic materials in flats. The results of assessing the multimedia personal exposure help obtain adequate information about the contribution of concentrations of toxicants in microenvironments in the total toxic load, develop personal measures of its reduction as well as recommendations for health risk management on the population level. S.V. Kuzmin, E.A, Kuzmina, V.B. Gurvich, S.A. Voronin, L.I. Privalova, G.V. Matyukhina. The use of a multimedia personal toxic exposure for assessment of environmental risk factors in children (the example of Pervouralsk). In: Health protection in the population of industrial regions: the strategy of development, innovative approaches and perspectives. Proceedings of the Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation, Ekaterinburg, 28-30 October 2009. Pp. 72-75. .
Recommended publications
  • Systemic Criteria for the Evaluation of the Role of Monofunctional Towns in the Formation of Local Urban Agglomerations
    ISSN 2007-9737 Systemic Criteria for the Evaluation of the Role of Monofunctional Towns in the Formation of Local Urban Agglomerations Pavel P. Makagonov1, Lyudmila V. Tokun2, Liliana Chanona Hernández3, Edith Adriana Jiménez Contreras4 1 Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Russia 2 State University of Management, Finance and Credit Department, Russia 3 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Mexico 4 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Cómputo, Mexico [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. There exist various federal and regional monotowns do not possess any distinguishing self- programs aimed at solving the problem of organization peculiarities in comparison to other monofunctional towns in the periods of economic small towns. stagnation and structural unemployment occurrence. Nevertheless, people living in such towns can find Keywords. Systemic analysis, labor migration, labor solutions to the existing problems with the help of self- market, agglomeration process criterion, self- organization including diurnal labor commuting migration organization of monotown population. to the nearest towns with a more stable economic situation. This accounts for the initial reason for agglomeration processes in regions with a large number 1 Introduction of monotowns. Experimental models of the rank distribution of towns in a system (region) and evolution In this paper, we discuss the problems of criteria of such systems from basic ones to agglomerations are explored in order to assess the monotown population using as an example several intensity of agglomeration processes in the systems of monotowns located in Siberia (Russia). In 2014 the towns in the Middle and Southern Urals (the Sverdlovsk Government of the Russian Federation issued two and Chelyabinsk regions of Russia).
    [Show full text]
  • T H E T I M E W O
    GEOGRAPHY OF THE WORLD UralsTHE TIMEWORN GEOGRAPHY OF THE WORLD UralsTHE TIMEWORN By Barbara A. Somervill THE CHILD’S WORLD® CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Published in the United States of America by The Child’s World® PO Box 326, Chanhassen, MN 55317-0326 800-599-READ www.childsworld.com Content Adviser: Photo Credits: Cover/frontispiece: TASS/Sovfoto. Interior: Bryan & Cherry Alexander: 18; Animals Animals/Earth Scenes: 9 (OSF/O. Mark Williams, Newman), 14 (Bradley W. Stahl), 17 (Darek Kapp); Corbis: 11 (Steve Raymer), 26 Associate Professor, (Dave G. Houser); Wolfgang Kaehler: 6; Wolfgang Kaehler/Corbis: 8, 16, 21; Jacques University of Colorado, Langevin/Corbis Sygma: 22; Novosti/Sovfoto: 4, 24; TASS/Sovfoto: 5, 12, 13. Boulder, Colorado The Child’s World®: Mary Berendes, Publishing Director Editorial Directions, Inc.: E. Russell Primm, Editorial Director; Melissa McDaniel, Line Editor; Katie Marsico, Associate Editor; Judi Shiffer, Associate Editor and Library Media Specialist; Matthew Messbarger, Editorial Assistant; Susan Hindman, Copy Editor; Sarah E. De Capua and Lucia Raatma, Proofreaders; Marsha Bonnoit, Peter Garnham, Terry Johnson, Olivia Nellums, Chris Simms, Katherine Trickle, and Stephen Carl Wender, Fact Checkers; Tim Griffin/IndexServ, Indexer; Cian Loughlin O’Day, Photo Researcher; Linda S. Koutris, Photo Selector; XNR Productions, Inc., Cartographer The Design Lab: Kathleen Petelinsek, Design and Page Production Copyright © 2005 by The Child’s World® All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means without written permission from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Somervill, Barbara A. The timeworn Urals / by Barbara A. Somervill. p.
    [Show full text]
  • EAP Task Force
    EAP Task Force Document 5 Joint Meeting of the EU Water Initiative’s EECCA Working Group and the EAP Task Force Environmental Finance and Water Networks 29 March –1 April 2005, Chisinau, Moldova Overview of Domestic and International Private Companies Operating in the Water Utilities Sector in Russian Federation Participants are invited to take note of the document and to comment on it as appropriate. ACTION REQUIRED: For information, discussion, and endorsement. TABLE OF CONTENT: USED ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS..................................................................3 PREFACE........................................................................................................................4 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY...............................................................................................6 CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE COMPANIES OPERATING IN UTILITIES SECTOR IN RUSSIA..................................19 CHAPTER 2. EXPERIENCE OF DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE COMPANIES IN IMPLEMENTING SPECIFIC PROJECTS......................................................................28 RUSSIAN UTILITY SYSTEMS....................................................................................................................29 ROSVODOKANAL......................................................................................................................................33 NEW URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE OF PRIKAMYE..................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Indutry of Russia in 1998
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA By Richard M. Levine Russia extends over more than 75% of the territory of the According to the Minister of Natural Resources, Russia will former Soviet Union (FSU) and accordingly possesses a large not begin to replenish diminishing reserves until the period from percentage of the FSU’s mineral resources. Russia was a major 2003 to 2005, at the earliest. Although some positive trends mineral producer, accounting for a large percentage of the were appearing during the 1996-97 period, the financial crisis in FSU’s production of a range of mineral products, including 1998 set the geological sector back several years as the minimal aluminum, bauxite, cobalt, coal, diamonds, mica, natural gas, funding that had been available for exploration decreased nickel, oil, platinum-group metals, tin, and a host of other further. In 1998, 74% of all geologic prospecting was for oil metals, industrial minerals, and mineral fuels. Still, Russia was and gas (Interfax Mining and Metals Report, 1999n; Novikov significantly import-dependent on a number of mineral products, and Yastrzhembskiy, 1999). including alumina, bauxite, chromite, manganese, and titanium Lack of funding caused a deterioration of capital stock at and zirconium ores. The most significant regions of the country mining enterprises. At the majority of mining enterprises, there for metal mining were East Siberia (cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, was a sharp decrease in production indicators. As a result, in the columbium, platinum-group metals, tungsten, and zinc), the last 7 years more than 20 million metric tons (Mt) of capacity Kola Peninsula (cobalt, copper, nickel, columbium, rare-earth has been decommissioned at iron ore mining enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Sverdlovsk Region: Profile
    Sverdlovsk Region: Profile Geography Sverdlovsk region is situated at the boarder of Europe and Asia, at the junction of two large physical-geographical complexes. Its area is 194,8 thousand sq. km (1,1% of the Russian Federation area, that is 20th place in RF). The western part of the region lies mainly on the eastern slopes of the low Ural Mountains, their heights range from 700-800 up to 1569 m (Konzhakovsky Kamen mountain). Extreme southwest of the region is situated on the hilly Foreurals, and the eastern part of the region borders with West-Siberian Plain. The region is mainly covered with taiga. In the mountain part of the area prevail coniferous trees and the plain is mostly covered with pine forests with birch and aspen forests and forest-steppes in the south. The soils of the region are typical for forest and forest-steppe zones. The southern part of the region is well-developed, while the northern part is poorly populated and barely changed. The biggest rivers of the region are Tura, Tchusovaya, Sosva, Iset. 173 fresh water springs were found which can provide 1 408 thousand m3 of potable water per day that significantly increases water resources. Forests and numerous water sources create favorable conditions for development of tourism. Furthermore, national parks Pripyshminskiye Bory, reserves Visimsky and Denezhkin Kamen’ are situated on the territory of the region. More than 1900 different kinds of plants grow within the bounds of the region and nearly 212 species of various animals and birds could be found here. The region borders with Tyumen, Kurgan, Tchelyabinsk, Perm Regions and Bashkir and Komi Republics.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Companies
    List of companies Ural pipe plant Production of electric turbines 18, Frontovykh Brigad Str., Ekaterinburg, 620017 Russia Phone: +7 (343) 339-42-11, fax: 334-79-65 Open joint stock company «Uralhydromash» Production of deep-well pumps, hydraulic turbines 2а, Karl Libknekht Str., Sysert, Sverdlovsk region, 624020 Russia Phone: +7 (34374) 2-17-76, fax: 2-17-28 E-mail: [email protected] www.uhm.chat.ru Ural plant of heavy mechanical engineering Production of metallurgical, oil and gas, mining, hoisting and transport equipment, equipment for power industry Square of First pyatiletka, Ekaterinburg, 620012 Russia Phone: +7 (343) 336-60-22, fax: 269-60-40 E-mail: [email protected] www.uralmash.ru Ural diesel engine plant Production of diesel engines 18, Frontovykh Brigad Str., Ekaterinburg, 620017 Russia Phone: +7 (343) 334-42-22 Fax: +7 (343) 334-05-37 Baranchinskiy electromechanical plant 2а, Lenin Str., Baranchinskiy settlement, Kushva, Sverdlovsk region, 624305 Russia Phone: +7 (343) 372-86-91, fax: 370-45-22 Uralelectrotyazhmash 22, Frontovykh Brigad Str., Ekaterinburg, 620017 Russia Phone: +7 (343) 216-75-00, fax: 216-75-24 Ural plant of chemical mechanical engineering Production of chemical equipment 31, per. Khibinogorskiy, Ekaterinburg, 620010 Russia Phone: +7 (343) 221-74-00, fax: 227-50-92 E-mail: [email protected] www.uralhimmash.ru Open joint stock company «Pneumostroymashina» Production of power hydraulics for road-construction and hoisting and transport equipment 1, Sibirskiy tract, Ekaterinburg, 620055 Russia Phone: +7 (343)
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter in the Urals 7 Mountain Ski Resort “Stozhok” Mountain Ski Resort “Stozhok” Is a Quiet and Comfortable Place for Winter Holidays
    WinterIN THE URALS The Government of Sverdlovsk Region mountain ski resorts The Ministry of Investment and Development of Sverdlovsk Region ecotourism “Tourism Development Centre of Sverdlovsk Region” 13, 8 Marta Str., entrance 3, 2nd fl oor Ekaterinburg, 620014 active tourism phone +7 (343) 350-05-25 leisure base wellness winter fi shing gotoural.соm ice rinks ski resort FREE TABLE OF CONTENTS MOUNTAIN SKI RESORTS 6-21 GORA BELAYA 6-7 STOZHOK 8 ISET 9 GORA VOLCHIHA 10-11 GORA PYLNAYA 12 GORA TYEPLAYA 13 GORA DOLGAYA 14-15 GORA LISTVENNAYA 16 SPORTCOMPLEX “UKTUS” 17 GORA YEZHOVAYA 18-19 GORA VORONINA 20 FLUS 21 ACTIVE TOURISM 22-23 ECOTOURISM 24-27 ACTIVE LEISURE 28-33 LEISURE BASE 34-35 WELLNESS 36-37 WINTER FISHING 38-39 NEW YEAR’S FESTIVITIES 40-41 ICE RINKS, SKI RESORT 42-43 WINTER EVENT CALENDAR 44-46 LEGEND address chair lift GPS coordinates surface lift website trail for mountain skis phone trail for running skis snowtubing MAP OF TOURIST SITES Losva 1 Severouralsk Khanty-Mansi Sosnovka Autonomous Okrug Krasnoturyinsk Karpinsk 18 Borovoy 31 Serov Kytlym Gari 2 Pavda Sosva Andryushino Tavda Novoselovo Verkhoturye Alexandrovskaya Raskat Kachkanar Tura Iksa 3 Verhnyaya Tura Tabory Perm Region Niznyaya Tura Kumaryinskoe Basyanovskiy Kushva Tagil Niznyaya Salda Turinsk 27 29 Verkhnyaya Salda Nitza 4 Nizhny Tagil 26 1 Niznyaya Sinyachikha Chernoistochinsk Visimo-Utkinsk Alapaevsk 7 Verkhnie Tavolgi Irbit Turinskaya Sloboda Ust-Utka Chusovaya Visim Aramashevo Artemovskiy Verkhniy Tagil Nevyansk Rezh 10 25 Chusovoe 2 Shalya 23 Novouralsk
    [Show full text]
  • List of Cities in Russia
    Population Population Sr.No City/town Federal subject (2002 (2010 Census (preliminary)) Census) 001 Moscow Moscow 10,382,754 11,514,330 002 Saint Petersburg Saint Petersburg 4,661,219 4,848,742 003 Novosibirsk Novosibirsk Oblast 1,425,508 1,473,737 004 Yekaterinburg Sverdlovsk Oblast 1,293,537 1,350,136 005 Nizhny Novgorod Nizhny Novgorod Oblast 1,311,252 1,250,615 006 Samara Samara Oblast 1,157,880 1,164,896 007 Omsk Omsk Oblast 1,134,016 1,153,971 008 Kazan Republic of Tatarstan 1,105,289 1,143,546 009 Chelyabinsk Chelyabinsk Oblast 1,077,174 1,130,273 010 Rostov-on-Don Rostov Oblast 1,068,267 1,089,851 011 Ufa Republic of Bashkortostan 1,042,437 1,062,300 012 Volgograd Volgograd Oblast 1,011,417 1,021,244 013 Perm Perm Krai 1,001,653 991,530 014 Krasnoyarsk Krasnoyarsk Krai 909,341 973,891 015 Voronezh Voronezh Oblast 848,752 889,989 016 Saratov Saratov Oblast 873,055 837,831 017 Krasnodar Krasnodar Krai 646,175 744,933 018 Tolyatti Samara Oblast 702,879 719,514 019 Izhevsk Udmurt Republic 632,140 628,116 020 Ulyanovsk Ulyanovsk Oblast 635,947 613,793 021 Barnaul Altai Krai 600,749 612,091 022 Vladivostok Primorsky Krai 594,701 592,069 023 Yaroslavl Yaroslavl Oblast 613,088 591,486 024 Irkutsk Irkutsk Oblast 593,604 587,225 025 Tyumen Tyumen Oblast 510,719 581,758 026 Makhachkala Republic of Dagestan 462,412 577,990 027 Khabarovsk Khabarovsk Krai 583,072 577,668 028 Novokuznetsk Kemerovo Oblast 549,870 547,885 029 Orenburg Orenburg Oblast 549,361 544,987 030 Kemerovo Kemerovo Oblast 484,754 532,884 031 Ryazan Ryazan Oblast 521,560
    [Show full text]
  • SUPERSONIC ENERGY Business Report
    2009 INTERREGIONAL DISTRIBUTIVE G RID C OMPANY IDG C OF URALS SUPERSONIC ENERGY business report Back to Contents >> Key financial indicators1 2009 2009 20082 (US$, thous.) (RUR, thous.) (RUR, thous.) Revenues, including 1 299 894.1 41 297 636 35 964 707 transmission revenues 1 259 086.4 40 001 176 34 437 161 connection revenues 30 657.4 973 985 895 581 Expenses 1 152 773.4 36 623 611 33 947 171 Operating profit 147 120.7 4 674 025 2 017 536 Operating margin, % 11.3% 11.3% 5.6% EBITDA3 131 941.8 4 191 790 3 576 138 EBITDA margin, % 10.2% 10.2% 9.9% Pre-tax income 43 845.5 1 392 972 1 288 425 Net profit 33 152.9 1 053 267 862 085 Net margin, % 2.6% 2.6% 2.4% Earnings per share US$ 0.0003 RUR 0.01 RUR 0.02 Short-term loans and borrowings 0 0 1 200 000 Long-term loans and borrowings 175 749.5 5 583 562 5 161 534 bonds 51.6 1 638 1 000 000 Debt/ Equity, % 20% 20% 23% Equity/ Assets, % 66% 66% 66% Energy sales 2009 2008 Change, % Energy supply, mln kW/h 75 795.9 86 365.8 - 12.24 Productive supply, mln kW/h 69 339.2 79 902 - 13.22 1 Key financial indicators of the Company are represented on the basis of 2008-2009 Operating figures 2009 audited financial statements under Russian Accounting Aerial lines (in chains), km 122 054 Standards (RAS). 2009 indica- tors were shown in US dollars Aerial lines (in lines), km 113 210 just for information (average rate as of 2009 is 1US$= RUR Cable lines, km 4 691 31.77).
    [Show full text]
  • The Implementation of the Competition Development Standard
    The 12th International Days of Statistics and Economics, Prague, September 6-8, 2018 THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION DEVELOPMENT STANDARD Ekaterina Ogorodnikova – Alexandr Kokovikhin – Andrey Plakhin Abstract The article contains data obtained as a result of research into the implementation methodology of The competition development standard in the subjects of the Russian Federation on the materials of Sverdlovsk region.The methods of introducing the Standard from the position of the general management methodology and from the position of evaluation of business entities are characterized. The basis for the study was the normative documents of state authorities and local self- government of the Sverdlovsk region, which ensure the implementation of the Standard, as well as the results of surveys of business entities. The method of conducting the survey was an online survey conducted on the website of the regional Investments and DevelopmentMinistry. The base of respondents includes more than 2000 subjects of entrepreneurial activity. The authors have revealed the methodological disproportions in the formation of the management tools for the implementation of the Standard, which consist in the prevalence of economic methods for the implementation of the competition development standard in the subjects of the Russian Federation on the territory of the Sverdlovsk Region. The results of the study allow to formulate recommendations on increasing the effectiveness of measures taken by state authorities and local self-government bodies in
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation Dated July
    Resolution # 784 of the Government of the Russian Federation dated July 17, 1998 On the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (Incorporates changes and additions of August 7, August 14, October 31, November 14, December 18, 1998; February 27, August 30, September 3, September 9, October 16, December 31, 1999; March 16, October 19, 2001; and May 15, 2002) In connection with the Federal Law “On Privatization of State Property and Fundamental Principles of Privatizing Municipal Property in the Russian Federation”, and in accordance with paragraph 1 of Decree # 478 of the President of the Russian Federation dated May 11, 1995 “On Measures to Guarantee the Accommodation of Privatization Revenues in thee Federal Budget” (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 1995, # 20, page 1776; 1996, # 39, page 4531; 1997, # 5, page 658; # 20, page 2240), the Government of the Russian Federation has resolved: 1. To adopt the List of Joint-Stock Companies Producing Goods (Products, Services) of Strategic Importance for Safeguarding National Security of the State with Federally-Owned Shares Not to Be Sold Ahead of Schedule (attached). In accordance with Decree # 1514 of the President of the Russian Federation dated December 21, 2001, pending the adoption by the President of the Russian Federation in concordance with Article 6 of the Federal Law “On Privatization of State and Municipal Property” of lists of strategic enterprises and strategic joint-stock companies, changes and additions to the list of joint-stock companies adopted by this Resolution shall bee introduced by Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation issued on the basis of Decrees of the President of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]