POSTMODERNISM AND BECKETT'S AESTHETICS OF FAILURE Author(s): Laura Cerrato Source: Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd'hui, Vol. 2, BECKETT IN THE 1990s (1993), pp. 21- 30 Published by: Brill Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25781147 Accessed: 02-04-2016 06:10 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Brill is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd'hui This content downloaded from 132.174.254.12 on Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:10:26 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms POSTMODERNISM AND BECKETT'S AESTHETICS OF FAILURE Is Beckett a modernist or is he a postmodernist? Probably, even before the appearance of this second term, Beckett had already chosen for himself (if we can think in terms of choice, concerning this question) when, in 1937, in his "German Letter", he decided: "Let us therefore act as the mad mathematician who used a different principle of measurement at each step of his calculation."1 But why is it suddenly so important to define Beckett in terms of Modernism or Postmodernism? Perhaps one of the reasons is that modernism has traditionally involved all the great and original writers who have transgressed the canon of their times, and because postmodernism has most often been described with regard to non-artistic and non-literary values.