Commission on Life Chances and Child Poverty
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Fabian Society The Fabian Society is Britain’s leading left of centre think tank and political society, committed to creating the political ideas and policy debates which can shape the future of progressive politics. With over 300 Fabian MPs, MEPs, Peers, MSPs and AMs, the Society plays an unparalleled role in linking the ability to influence policy debates at the highest level with vigorous grassroots debate among our growing membership of over 7000 people, 70 local branches meeting regularly throughout Britain and a vibrant Young Fabian section organising its own activities. Fabian publications, events and ideas therefore reach and influence a wider audience than those of any comparable think tank. The Society is unique among think tanks in being a thriving, democratically-constituted membership organisation, affiliated to the Labour Party but organisationally and editorially independent. For over 120 years Fabians have been central to every important renewal and revision of left of centre thinking. The Fabian commitment to open and participatory debate is as important today as ever before as we explore the ideas, politics and policies which will define the next generation of progressive politics in Britain, Europe and around the world. Find out more at www.fabian-society.org.uk Fabian Society 11 Dartmouth Street London SW1H 9BN www.fabian-society.org.uk Fabian ideas Series editor: Jonathan Heawood First published June 2005 ISBN 0 7163 0616 6 ISSN 1746-1146 This pamphlet, like all publications of the Fabian Society, represents not the collective views of the Society but only the views of the author. The responsibility of the Society is limited to approving its publications as worthy of consideration within the Labour movement. This publication may not be reproduced without express permission of the Fabian Society. British Library Cataloguing in Publication data. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Printed by Bell & Bain, Glasgow Why Life Chances Matter Acknowledgements This collection brings together the interim report of the Fabian Commission on Life Chances and Child Poverty and the texts of the Fabian Life Chances lecture series, held in March 2005, along with a new introduction by Sunder Katwala, and responses to the lectures by Polly Toynbee, Lisa Harker, Victor Adebowale, Geoff Whitty and Sukhvinder Stubbs. The Fabian Society would like to thank all the contributors for putting such enthusiasm into this project, and the sponsors of the Life Chances lecture series for their support: Pre- School Learning Alliance; Turning Point; British Property Federation; VT Education; Groundwork; and the Institute of Education for hosting the lectures. The Fabian Commission on Life Chances and Child Poverty is kindly supported by the Barrow Cadbury Trust, the Sutton Trust, the Webb Memorial Trust and the Dartmouth Street Trust. Without their commitment to supporting independent and original research its work would not be possible. The Commissioners would like to thank the Fabian Secretariat to the Commission: Louise Bamfield, Sadia Haider and Richard Brooks; as well as Sunder Katwala, Jonathan Heawood and the other staff at the Fabian Society. The Commissioners would like to thank the qualitative research staff at MORI, particularly Julian Thompson and Sarah Castell, for their invaluable expertise and timely assistance with the deliberative research aspect of this project. Our thanks also go to the many other people and organisations which have given input. The views expressed in the interim report are the responsibility of the Commissioners alone and do not necessarily represent the views of the sponsors or any other organisation or individual that has assisted the Commission in its work. iv Contents Part One: The third term challenge Sunder Katwala 1 Part Two: Life Chances: What the public really think about poverty—the Fabian Commission Interim Report 1 | Introduction 11 2 | Attitudes towards poverty and life chances 16 3 | Life chances and the politics of equality 35 4 | Making the case for more equal life chances 44 Part Three: The Fabian Life Chances lectures 5 | David Miliband | ‘A fairer Britain’ 54 6 | John Reid | ‘Aspiration moves the world’ 66 7 | Alan Milburn | ‘Labour values’ 75 8 | Ruth Kelly | ‘The comprehensive ideal’ 87 9 | Yvette Cooper | ‘We have not yet gone far enough’ 100 References 117 Terms of Reference 121 The Commission comprises the following members: Lord Victor Adebowale is the Chair of Aftab Rahman is the Community the Commission, an independent peer Cohesion Co-ordinator at the and the Chief Executive of Turning Point. government Office for the West Midlands Polly Toynbee is a columnist with the and is a former development manager Guardian newspaper and author of for the Bangladeshi Youth Forum. Hard Work: Life in Low-Pay Britain. David Piachaud is Professor of Social Peter Townsend is Professor of Policy at the London School of Economics. International Social Policy at the LSE, Andrew Robinson is Head of President of the Child Poverty Action Community Development Banking at Group and Vice-President of the NatWest and Royal Bank of Scotland. Fabian Society. Richard Exell OBE is a Senior Policy Ruth Lister CBE is Professor of Social Officer at the TUC and is a member of Policy at Loughborough University, was a the Disability Rights Commission and of member of the Commission on Social the Social Security Advisory Committee. Justice and a former Director of the Fran Bennett is a Senior Research Fellow Child Poverty Action Group. at the Department of Social Policy and Ruth Cadbury is a trustee of the Barrow Social Work at the University of Oxford, Cadbury trust and an Executive and a freelance consultant on social Councillor in the London Borough of policy issues. She is a former Director of Hounslow. the Child Poverty Action Group. The Fabian Life Chances Lectures were delivered by the following: Yvette Cooper is MP for Pontefract and Castleford and Minister for Housing and Planning. At the time of the Fabian Life Chances Lectures she was Minister for Sustainable Communities. Ruth Kelly is MP for Bolton West and Secretary of State for Education and Skills. Alan Milburn is MP for Darlington. At the time of these lectures he was Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. David Miliband is MP for South Shields and Minister for Communities and Local Government. At the time of these lectures he was Minister for the Cabinet Office. John Reid is MP for Airdrie and Shotts and Secretary of State for Defence. At the time of these lectures he was Secretary of State for Health. vi Part One The Third Term Challenge The Third Term Challenge Sunder Katwala he mission to improve and equalise life chances defines the polit- ical left. That is the central argument of this collection. The TLabour government’s stated ambition is to embed a ‘progressive consensus’ in British politics and society. If it is to succeed, it will need to give a sharper public account of ‘Labour Britain’—how the country it is seeking to create differs from the unequal Britain which Labour inher- ited and governs today. That is why the Fabian Society, on the eve of the 2005 campaign, invited leading ministers to set out a positive life chances agenda, and to debate their vision in post-lecture debates with leading opinion formers. The Life Chances lecture series, and the work of the Fabian Life Chances Commision, articulate a clear progressive purpose for Labour’s third term. The speeches are at times strikingly frank in acknowledging just how much Labour has still to do. They set out the progress made on employment and the minimum wage and the attack on child and pensioner poverty. But a clear critique of the limits, as well as the scope, of New Labour’s first eight years is implicit in David Miliband’s analysis that having ‘proven competence’ and ‘delivered progress’ in its first and second terms, it will take the third term to ‘decide whether this is a realigning government’. Miliband’s central argument, in opening the lecture series, that ‘inequality in life chances defines the moral, economic and social agenda we face’ was developed across the range of policy areas in subsequent lectures. For John Reid, a politics of empow- The Third Term Challenge erment is central to narrowing health inequalities; Ruth Kelly argues that the evidence of stalled social mobility demonstrates the need for education reform, citing Anthony Crosland’s vision of comprehensive education as an engine of social equality; Alan Milburn argues that a third Labour victory, marking a historic defeat for Thatcherism, must enable progressives to break the glass ceiling on opportunity; and Yvette Cooper offers a powerful analysis of why Labour must do more to mobilise public support for an attack on inequality, as well as poverty and social exclusion. Governments face many demands and pressures. Of course, adminis- trative competence is necessary; being trusted to run a strong economy is vital, and being able to win support and sustain a progressive govern- ment over time is essential. Yet the argument here is that all of these, however challenging in themselves, ultimately remain merely means to an end. For progressives, the fundamental test of a Labour government is how far it can be judged to have reduced inequality in life chances, by improving and spreading opportunities. This is, rightly, to set the bar high. The jury is out on how far the third term will now deliver on this ambition. This introduction seeks to assess the implications for the politics of life chances of the 2005 General Election. The election presented what could be seen as three reasons for sober pessimism about the prospects for a life chances-centred third Labour term: firstly, the life chances narrative and analysis was too often missing from the election campaign; secondly, a narrower majority and the electoral landscape of 2009 will make a substantive life chances agenda more difficult to pursue; and thirdly, the government’s post- election response has not, to date, put tackling inequality at the heart of its third term political and policy narrative.