DOCSLIB.ORG

A Failure of Trust: Resolving Property Disputes on Cohabitation Breakdown

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Failure of Trust: Resolving Property Disputes on Cohabitation Breakdown CARDIFF LAW SCHOOL RESEARCH PAPERS No: 1 A Failure of Trust: Resolving Property Disputes on Cohabitation Breakdown Report of a Research Study funded by the ESRC by Gillian Douglas, Julia Pearce and Hilary Woodward ISBN 0-9516976-7-6 This study was conducted jointly by Cardiff University and the University of Bristol A Failure of Trust: Resolving Property Disputes on Cohabitation Breakdown by Gillian Douglas Julia Pearce Hilary Woodward 2007 First published in Great Britain in 2007 by: School of Law Cardiff Law School University of Bristol Cardiff University Wills Memorial Building Museum Avenue Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ Cardiff CF10 3AX ISBN 0-9516976-7-6 www.law.cf.ac.uk/research/researchpapers/paper1.html www.bris.ac.uk/law/research/centres-themes/cohabit/cohabit-rep.pdf © Gillian Douglas, Julia Pearce and Hilary Woodward 2007 Gillian Douglas is Professor of Law at Cardiff University, Julia Pearce is a Research Fellow at the University of Bristol and Hilary Woodward is a Research Associate at Cardiff University. All rights reserved: no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the authors. Acknowledgements We would like to express our thanks to the following, whose kind assistance enabled us to complete this study. The research was funded by the ESRC and conducted during 2004 to 2007. Additional funding was provided by Cardiff University (Vice-Chancellor’s Fund) and the University of Bristol (Law and Policy Research Unit) to facilitate completion and production of this report. Access to court records was provided with the permission of the (then) Department for Constitutional Affairs and the Court Service. We would particularly like to thank Deirdre Back of the DCA Research Secretariat for her assistance in processing our application for access. We also wish to record our gratitude to the staff of the court where we conducted our file study for their help in enabling us to find and sort the records we needed. We could not have undertaken the study without the co-operation and support of professional practitioners – the family solicitors, conveyancers and mediators in the four study areas. The practitioners who agreed to participate in the study gave generously of their time not only to share their insights and perspectives at interview, but were also immensely helpful and patient with us, particularly when we made repeated telephone calls to seek their advice or to follow up queries arising from interviews. We also wish to thank the district judges and barristers who participated in our focus groups to discuss our preliminary findings and who provided their own perspectives on how these cases are handled in the courts. We would like also to thank James Sandbach, in the Social Policy Department of Citizens Advice, for his informative co-operation at the preliminary stages of the study, and also to the managers of the CABx in two of the study areas who assisted by providing us with information about the types of case they handle, and in offering views on the law and its problems. Most of all, we owe an enormous debt of gratitude to the 29 cohabitants who agreed to take part in the study. They were dealing with a very stressful situation, over what turned out to be, for many of them, an extended period of time, but they were unfailingly prepared to discuss very personal matters in frank detail. Their experiences, perceptions and views provided us with the greatest insights into the difficulties that arise when cohabitants separate and we hope that we have done justice to their accounts. We would like to thank Professor Emeritus Gwynn Davis, of the University of Bristol, who advised on the original research proposal, and Professors Nigel Lowe, Richard Moorhead and Mervyn Murch CBE, of Cardiff Law School, who offered advice during the study, read drafts of our report and provided many helpful comments for its improvement. We would also like to express our thanks to Professor Stuart Bridge and Jo Miles of the Law Commission for the opportunity to pass on our findings and discuss their implications for the Law Commission’s proposed reforms of the law. Finally our thanks go to Kay Bader for her feedback and invaluable help in the preparation of this report and to Carol Marks for her help with typing up the fieldnotes. Contents Page List of Tables i Table of Cases ii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Research aims and questions 1 The specific population for study 2 Use of qualitative methods 3 Method 3 Report structure 5 Chapter 2: The demographic and social picture 7 Incidence of cohabitation 7 Duration and stability of cohabitation 8 Children of cohabiting couples 8 Pre-marital cohabitation 9 Cohabitation instead of marriage 10 Attitudes to cohabitation 10 Cohabitants’ knowledge of their legal position 14 Cohabitants’ property arrangements 15 Cohabitants’ separation arrangements 16 Summary 18 Chapter 3: The legal landscape 19 Introduction 19 The protection of cohabitation as a human right 20 Ownership of the family home in England and Wales 21 Establishing an interest 24 Quantification of shares in the property 29 Occupation of the family home 31 Statutory protection and recognition of cohabitants’ 32 property interests Powers where the cohabitants have a child – Schedule 1 34 to the Children Act 1989 Summary 36 Chapter 4: The cohabitants 37 Basic statistical data 37 General profile of the core sample 39 Attitudes to marriage 40 Financial arrangements during the relationship 43 Engagement with the law 48 Summary 53 Chapter 5: Property 54 Ownership 54 Agreements 55 Understanding of ownership at the time of purchase 56 Views of family solicitors 59 Conveyancing practice and procedures 60 Summary 67 Chapter 6: The issues 69 The cohabitants’ perspective 69 The legal perspective 77 Seeking advice 81 Summary 88 Chapter 7: The practitioners 90 The family solicitors 90 The mediators 98 Involvement of barristers 102 Summary 103 Chapter 8: The process of resolving the issues 105 Cohabitants resolving issues with minimal professional help 105 Negotiations 107 The Land Registry 113 Issuing proceedings 115 The duration of cases 119 The cost of cases 119 Summary 121 Chapter 9: Outcomes 122 How the cohabitants resolved their primary issues 122 Cohabitants’ satisfaction with the outcomes 124 The practitioner perspective 130 What if the cohabitants had been married? 133 Difficult cases 135 After the final order or agreement 136 Summary 137 Chapter 10: Conclusions and reform 138 The injustice created by the current law 138 Reform of the current law 139 The Law Commission’s proposals in 2006 141 A critique of the proposed scheme 144 Suggested reforms to property and conveyancing law 146 In conclusion 147 Appendices Appendix 1: Method 149 Appendix 2: Pen pictures 163 Appendix 3: Interview schedules 182 Bibliography 193 List of Tables page Table 1: Sample Profile 37 Table 2: Couples: Length of relationship/Financial contributions 43 Table 3: Couples: Property ownership / Banks accounts / Financial 45 Management Table 4: Home Ownership 55 Table 5: Means of resolution by issue for core sample participants 123 i Table of Cases A v A (A Minor: Financial Provision) [1994] 1 FLR 657 Re B (Child: Property) [1999] 2 FLR 418, CA Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571, CA Barclays Bank plc v O’Brien [1994] 1 AC 180, HL Re Basham [1987] 1 All ER 405 Bedson v Bedson [1965] 2 QB 666, CA Bernard v Josephs [1982] Ch 391, CA Burns v Burns [1984] Ch 317, CA Chamberlain v Chamberlain [1974] 1 All ER 33, CA Chan Pui Chun v Leung Kam Ho [2002] EWCA Civ 1075 [2003] 1 FLR 23 Chapman v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 399 Cowcher v Cowcher [1972] 1 All ER 943 Curley v Parkes [2004] EWCA Civ 1515 Drake v Whipp [1996] 1 FLR 826, CA Draskovic v Draskovic (1980) 11 Fam Law 87. Re Evers’ Trust [1980] 3 All ER 399, CA Eves v Eves [1975] 3 All ER 768, CA Fender v St John Mildmay [1938] AC 1, HL G v G (Periodical Payments: Jurisdiction) [1997] 1 FLR 368, CA Gay v Sheeran [1999] 2 FLR 519, CA Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 [2004] 2 AC 557 Gillett v Holt [2000] 2 FLR 266, CA Gillow v United Kingdom (1986) 11 EHRR 335 Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886, HL Goodman v Gallant [1986] Fam 106, CA Grant v Edwards [1986] Ch 638, CA Greasley v Cooke [1980] 3 All ER 710, CA. H v P (Illegitimate Child: Capital Provision) [1993] Fam Law 515 Hammond v Mitchell [1992] 2 All ER 109 Harwood v Harwood [1991] 2 FLR 274 Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43 [2004] 1 AC 983 Horrocks v Forray [1976] 1 All ER 737, CA Huntingford v Hobbs [1993] 1 FLR 736, CA J v C (Child: Financial Provision) [1999] 1 FLR 152 Jones v Challenger [1961] 1 QB 176, CA ii K v K (Minors: Property Transfer) [1992] 2 All ER 727, CA Karner v Austria (2004) 38 EHRR 24 Keegan v Ireland (1994) 18 EHRR 342 Kroon v Netherlands (1995) 19 EHRR 263 Laird v Laird [1999] 1 FLR 791 Lebbink v Netherlands [2004] 2 FLR 463 Le Foe v Le Foe and Woolwich plc [2001] 2 FLR 970 Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset [1991] 1 AC 107, HL Mesher v Mesher [1980] 1 All ER 126 Midland Bank plc v Cooke [1995] 4 All ER 562, CA Midland Bank plc v Dobson [1986] 1 FLR 171, CA Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [2006] 2 AC 618 Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546 [2004] 3 All ER 703 Re P (Child: Financial Provision) [2003] EWCA Civ 837 [2003] 2 FLR 865 Pascoe v Turner [1979] 2 All ER 945, CA Paul v Constance [1977] 1 All ER 195, CA Pettitt v Pettitt [1970] AC 777, HL Rowe v Prance [1999] 2 FLR 787 Royal Bank of Scotland (No 2) v Etridge [2001] UKHL 44, [2002] 2 AC 773 Saucedo Gomez v Spain Application No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is a Rebound Relationship?
    What Is A Rebound Relationship? By Nina Atwood What is the definition of a "rebound relationship"? Is it true they can be unhealthy? - David Rebound relationships occur very shortly after the Commitment hunger. "My last boyfriend dated end of a significant love, and sometimes begin me for three years without making a commitment, before the end. The problem with a rebound is that so I'm expecting an engagement ring within six it doesn't allow time for the grieving and healing months or I'm out of here." process to be complete. Chronic fear and anxiety. "After what my ex did When this happens, there is emotional confusion. to me, I have to constantly check to see that you're Sometimes, the feelings for the old partner simply really there for me, even if that drives you crazy." transfer to the new one, and that results in the illusion that you've found someone totally Skyrocket relationship. Rebound dating "different," when, in fact, you've found someone relationships are often too fast-paced, with a false very much like your old love. Often the issues that sense of urgency, in order to "make sure" that this drove you away from your previous partner are the one sticks. very ones with which you eventually find yourself grappling in the new relationship. The biggest risk of a rebound is that it serves its purpose and then the re-bounder moves on, Rebound relationships serve a purpose: To protect leaving someone else devastated. If you're dating the heart from the devastation of losing someone someone who has just left another relationship, very important.
    [Show full text]
  • First Evidence of Multiple Paternity in the Bull Shark (Carcharhinus Leucas) Agathe Pirog, Sébastien Jaquemet, Marc Soria, Hélène Magalon
    First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) Agathe Pirog, Sébastien Jaquemet, Marc Soria, Hélène Magalon To cite this version: Agathe Pirog, Sébastien Jaquemet, Marc Soria, Hélène Magalon. First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas). Marine and Freshwater Research, CSIRO Publishing, 2015, 10.1071/mf15255. hal-01253775 HAL Id: hal-01253775 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01253775 Submitted on 4 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) Agathe PirogA, Se´bastien JaquemetA,B, Marc SoriaC and He´le`ne MagalonA,B,D AUniversite´ de La Re´union, UMR 9220 ENTROPIE (Universite´ de La Re´union/IRD/CNRS), 15 Avenue Rene´ Cassin, CS 92003, F-97744 Saint Denis Cedex 09, La Re´union, France. BLaboratory of Excellence CORAIL, 58, Avenue Paul Alduy, F-66860 Perpignan Cedex, France. CIRD Re´union, UMR 248 MARBEC, CS 41095 2 rue Joseph Wetzell, F-97492 Sainte-Clotilde, La Re´union, France. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The present study assessed the occurrence of multiple paternity in four litters of bull shark Carcharhinus leucas (n ¼ 5, 8, 9 and 11 embryos) sampled at Reunion Island in the Western Indian Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Humans Have Sex
    Arch Sex Behav (2007) 36:477–507 DOI 10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Why Humans Have Sex Cindy M. Meston Æ David M. Buss Received: 20 December 2005 / Revised: 18 July 2006 / Accepted: 24 September 2006 / Published online: 3 July 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract Historically, the reasons people have sex have Keywords Sexual motivation Á Sexual intercourse Á been assumed to be few in number and simple in nature–to Gender differences reproduce, to experience pleasure, or to relieve sexual tension. Several theoretical perspectives suggest that mo- tives for engaging in sexual intercourse may be larger in Introduction number and psychologically complex in nature. Study 1 used a nomination procedure that identified 237 expressed Why people have sex is an extremely important, but reasons for having sex, ranging from the mundane (e.g., ‘‘I surprisingly little studied topic. One reason for its relative wanted to experience physical pleasure’’) to the spiritual neglect is that scientists might simply assume that the (e.g., ‘‘I wanted to get closer to God’’), from altruistic (e.g., answers are obvious: to experience sexual pleasure, to ‘‘I wanted the person to feel good about himself/herself’’) relieve sexual tension, or to reproduce. Previous research to vengeful (e.g., ‘‘I wanted to get back at my partner for already tells us that the answers cannot be as few or having cheated on me’’). Study 2 asked participants psychologically simple. Leigh (1989), for example, docu- (N = 1,549) to evaluate the degree to which each of the 237 mented seven reasons for sex: pure pleasure, to express reasons had led them to have sexual intercourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Degrees of Freedom
    February 2015 D of F EXPANDING COLLEGE OPPORTUNITIES for Currently and Formerly Incarcerated Californians Stanford Criminal Justice Center Chief Justice Earl Warren Stanford Law School Institute on Law and Social Policy UC Berkeley School of Law DEGREES OF FREEDOM: Expanding College Opportunities for Currently and Formerly Incarcerated Californians February 2015 A report of the Renewing Communities Initiative Acknowledgements This report was co-written by Debbie Mukamal, Rebecca Silbert, and Rebecca M. Taylor. This report is part of a larger initiative – Renewing Communities – to expand college opportunities for currently and formerly incarcerated students in California. Nicole Lindahl was a contributing author; Nicole Lindahl and Laura Van Tassel also provided research assistance for this report. The research and publication of this report has been supported by the Ford Foundation. The authors thank Douglas Wood of the Ford Foundation for his vision and leadership which catapulted this report. The authors are grateful to the many people who provided information, experience, and guidance in the development of this report. These individuals are listed in Appendix A. Any errors or misstatements in this report are the responsibility of the authors; the recommendations made herein may, or may not, be supported by the individuals listed in Appendix A. Founded in 2005, the Stanford Criminal Justice Center serves as a research and policy institute on issues related to the criminal justice system. Its efforts are geared towards both generating policy research for the public sector, as well as providing pedagogical opportunities to Stanford Law School students with academic or career interests in criminal law and crime policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Grounds
    Grounds of Marriage Nullity The following are the possible grounds that can be used in a marriage case before a Tribunal. There is a brief description and a list of questions relating to each ground. The judges decide each case solely on the basis of whether the grounds are proven by the testimony submitted by the parties, their witnesses, and expert consultants. If you are starting a marriage case with the Tribunal, the Case Assessor will help you to suggest or propose grounds for your case. If you have already started a case, or if you are a Respondent in a case, your Advocate can help you to understand the grounds. If you believe that one or more grounds may be applicable to your case, the questions will help you in selecting possible witnesses. Witnesses will be asked questions related to the ground or grounds used in the case. Every marriage case must have at least one ground. At the beginning of the process, the parties suggest possible grounds and explain in written statements why they believe those grounds apply to their case. After both parties have had the opportunity to do this, the Judges will set the actual ground or grounds for the case. The parties will be notified of the grounds. They may express their objections to the chosen grounds if they so choose, and the Judges may then reconsider. The Judges may select several grounds at the beginning of the case; the testimony of the parties and witnesses will determine which is the best ground on which to judge the case in the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Is It Really Over?: How Past Romantic Relationships Impact Subsequent Relationships Cassie Elizabeth Shimek [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2-2019 If We're "Over," Is It Really Over?: How Past Romantic Relationships Impact Subsequent Relationships Cassie Elizabeth Shimek [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Interpersonal and Small Group Communication Commons Recommended Citation Shimek, Cassie Elizabeth, "If We're "Over," Is It Really Over?: How Past Romantic Relationships Impact Subsequent Relationships" (2019). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4905. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4905 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. IF WE’RE “OVER,” IS IT REALLY OVER?: HOW PAST ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS IMPACT SUBSEQUENT RELATIONSHIPS A Dissertation Submitted to Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Communication Studies by Cassie Elizabeth Shimek B.A., Sam Houston State University, 2009 M.A., Sam Houston State University, 2012 August 2019 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My continued work and effort to prove myself through my accomplishments was a selfish necessity that impacted so many important people that surrounded and continue to support me. I realize that my pursuit of a doctoral degree is not just my accomplishment now, but something all of my loved ones sacrificed for and therefore ultimately reap the reward of.
    [Show full text]
  • PW 454 Is Two New Lovers Double The
    +Polyamory Weekly Show Notes 454: Two new lovers: double the fun? November 12, 2015 Introduction Under 18? Stop listening now and visit http://www.scarleteen.com 1:00 Host Chat Want to find out about new episodes, classes and ebooks hot off the press? Sign up for our email newsletter. 1:30 Poly in the News • Death is more complicated with poly relationships • Can polyamory solve China’s gender imbalance problem? 7:00 Topic: Is taking two new lovers double the fun? • A listener writes in to ask if it’s common to date two new people at once. Is more jealousy and insecurity a natural side effect of that situation? o It depends on the people involved. o What’s more important is what do YOU want and need. Does this situation work for you? • Alisha writes in to ask what to do: she wants to be her partner’s girlfriend, but he’s on the rebound from a 14-year marriage and feels he can’t be in a serious relationship. What to do? o Date your species. 16:30 Feedback Herbalwise calls in to say he LOVES to date poly newbies! 20:00 Happy Poly Moment Greg shares a happy poly moment as a sex worker deciding to expand his boundaries and getting love and support from his partners when he does! 21:45 Wrap Up Questions? Comments? Feedback? Email [email protected] and attach an audio comment or call the listener comment line at 802-505-POLY. Friend us on Twitter or Facebook, leave a comment here.
    [Show full text]
  • Are You the One for Me?: Knowing Whos Right & Avoiding Whos Wrong Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    ARE YOU THE ONE FOR ME?: KNOWING WHOS RIGHT & AVOIDING WHOS WRONG PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Barbara De Angelis | 353 pages | 01 Apr 1997 | Random House (Pty) Ltd South Africa | 9780440506706 | English | Parklands, South Africa Are You the One for ME?: Knowing Whos Right & Avoiding Whos Wrong PDF Book Look in the mirror people! It just takes organization. Sort order. Wish I had read this, long long ago. Apr 17, Alfred Timothy Lotho rated it really liked it. May 14, Wyatt rated it it was amazing. Old fashioned and only fits sixties-seventies. It tells what differences can be worked out and which probably never will. I worked through all of the exercises, which I usually skip! Review: Are You the One for Me? Never the less, this book has helped me feel at ease that I am at least aiming in the right direction At the time I read this, which was just after Carol died, it was, to date, the single best, most informative and valuable book I'd ever picked up, and became my "bible" for awhile, or what others such as my wife call a purse book because it warrants carrying eveywhere and re-reading parts until you feel you've gained all you can from it. It asserts and normalises what perhaps you already know. We all seek out old habits but Deangelos teaches us how to break the mold of failure. Quick and easy read too. You pick up a lot of self-esteem along the way an Good God! Feb 16, Angela Cloud rated it it was amazing.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DUTY to MISCEGENATE by Nathaniel Adam Tobias Coleman A
    THE DUTY TO MISCEGENATE by Nathaniel Adam Tobias Coleman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Philosophy) in The University of Michigan 2013 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elizabeth S. Anderson, Chair Associate Professor Sarah Buss Associate Professor Anna R. Kirkland Professor Peter A. Railton © Nathaniel Adam Tobias Coleman 2013 DEDICATION Doris May Hinds 27th March 1921 – 13th April 2013 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Elizabeth Secor Anderson. I thank Stella Botchway & Mark Morris Bernard Green, Linda Shultes, Molly Mahony, Sarah Buss, Anna Kirkland, & Peter Railton, Lorrel Rose Coleman, Michael Silvera Hinds, Vanessa Coleman, Linda Amanda Victoria Campbell, Ryan Eleseo Augustus Campbell, & Lydia Eleanor Campbell. 'If people of color are to "do" philosophy, philosophers must be willing to "do" people of color. When we give minorities' issues their due we dignify them as moral agents with morally and intellectually significant lives' (Allen-Castellitto 2000: 198). iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii LIST OF TABLES v CHAPTER 1. Social stigmatisation: 'a social tyranny' The chief mischief of the legal penalties 1 They strengthen the social stigma 31 2. Encounters that count: 'a foundation for solid friendship' The real remedy for breaking caste is inter-marriage 60 Another plan of action for the abolition of caste is to begin with inter-caste dinners 81 3. White right: 'a right to avoid' We have a right to avoid it 103 A right to avoid blacks? 113 BIBLIOGRAPHY 136 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Miscegenation 6 Table 2. Social tyranny 46 Table 3. Kukathas's right to exit 116 Table 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohabitation, Marriage and Children's Economic Well-Being
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Cohabitation, marriage and children’s economic well-being: Spain in comparative perspective Xiaoteng Hu Cohabitation, marriage and children’s economic well-being: Spain in comparative perspective Xiaoteng Hu Doctoral Dissertation Directors: Lluís Flaquer i Vilardebò Almudena Moreno Minguez Anna Garriga Alsina PhD Programme in Sociology Department of Sociology Faculty of Political Sciences and Sociology Autonomous University of Barcelona May 2018, Bellaterra – Barcelona (Spain) Acknowledgements Being a PhD student is one of the most significant experience in my life, it’s a journey full of opportunities as well as challenges. Standing at the end of the fantastic journey, I realized that without the help of those important persons in my life, achieving this is not even close to possible. Thus, here I would like to express my deepest appreciations to all of you. To begin with, I would like to acknowledge and thank my supervisors Lluís Flaquer, Anna Garriga, and Almudena Moreno for the systematic guidance, effective support, and constant encouragement they provided throughout my dissertation process. In particular, I feel grateful for the support and mentorship by Lluís Flaquer on my journey as a doctoral student, and I could not have imagined a better supervisor for my doctoral study.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Rebound Hits CSUF Hawaii Is No Vacation for Titans Women’S Soccer Heads to Honolulu for Big West Play
    Wednesday October 19, 2016 The Student Voice of California State University, Fullerton Volume 100 Issue 28 FB.COM/THEDAILYTITAN WWW.DAILY TITAN.COM INSTAGRAM & TWITTER @THEDAILYTITAN Project Rebound hits CSUF Hawaii is no vacation for Titans Women’s soccer heads to Honolulu for Big West play. HARRISON FAIGEN Daily Titan For most, imagining a trip to Hawaii conjures up visuals of crystal clear wa- ter, the feeling of sand be- tween their toes and the sounds of waves crashing into the shore at night. For Cal State Fullerton wom- en’s soccer, the trip won’t be quite so peaceful. “It’s not vacation and we’re not here to take a va- cation, we’re here to win a game,” said Titans leading scorer Sarah Fajnor after team practice Tuesday, in GRETCHEN DAVEY / DAILY TITAN preparation for their con- Romarilyn Ralston will serve as the program coordinator for the CSUF branch of Project Rebound, which hopes to reduce prison recividism rates by giving previously incarcerated ference matchup with Ha- people access to resources that can aid them in earning a college degree. Ralston is looking to spread community awareness both on and off campus for the program. waii on Sunday. “I think all of us have that mindset go- Program from San Francisco State Cal State Fullerton will individuals earn a degree program’s SFSU Associated ing into it, that it is just like be taking part in a three- and lower prison recidivism Students page. going to UCI or just like University receives grant, allowing year pilot program starting rates.
    [Show full text]
  • 1458697499761.Pdf
    THE ETHICAL A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO POLYAMORY, OPEN RELATIONSHIPS & OTHER ADVENTURES 2ND EDITION UPDATED & EXPANDED DOSSIE EASTON AND JANET W. HARDY CELESTIAL ARTS Berkeley Copyright © 1997, 2009 by Dossie Easton and Janet W. Hardy All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Celestial Arts, an imprint of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., New York. www.crownpublishing.com www.tenspeed.com Celestial Arts and the Celestial Arts colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. Previous edition published as The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities, by Dossie Easton and Catherine A. Liszt (Greenery Press, 1997). LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Easton, Dossie. The ethical slut: a practical guide to polyamory, open relationships, and other adventures. - 2nd ed., updated & expanded I Dossie Easton and Janet W. Hardy. p. cm. Includes index. Summary: "A practical guide to practicing polyamory and open relationships in ways that are ethically and emotionally sustainable"-Provided by publisher. 1. Non-monogamous relationships-United States. 2. Free love-United States. 3. Sexual ethics-United States. 4. Sex-United States. I. Hardy, Janet W. II. Title. HQ980.5.U5E27 2009 306.84'230973-dc22 2008043651 ISBN 9781587613371 Printed in the United States of America Cover design by The Book Designers Interior design by Chris Hall, Ampersand Visual Communications 11 109876543 Second Edition Contents Acknowledgments vii PART ONE WELCOME 1. Who Is an Ethical Slut? 3 2. Myths and Realities 9 3. Our Beliefs 20 4. Slut Styles 27 5. Battling Sex Negativity 4I 6. Infinite Possibilities 46 PART TWO THE PRACTICE OF SLUTHOOD 7.
    [Show full text]