The Psychology of Friendship

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Psychology of Friendship T he Psychology of Friendship The Psychology of Friendship EDITED BY MAHZAD HOJJAT and ANNE MOYER 1 1 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America. © Oxford University Press 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Hojjat, Mahzad, editor. | Moyer, Anne, editor. Title: The psychology of friendship / edited by Mahzad Hojjat, Anne Moyer. Description: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, [2017] Identifiers: LCCN 2016014079 | ISBN 9780190222024 (jacketed hardcover : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Friendship—Psychological aspects. Classification: LCC BF575.F66 P79 2017 | DDC 158.2/5—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016014079 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc., United States of America CONTENTS Foreword ix William K. Rawlins Contributors xv Introduction: Psychological Aspects of Friendship Across the Life Span, Settings, and Relationships xix Mahzad Hojjat and Anne Moyer PART I FRIENDSHIP ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN 1. Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence 3 Cynthia A. Erdley and Helen J. Day 2. Friendships in Young and Middle Adulthood: Normative Patterns and Personality Differences 21 Cornelia Wrzus, Julia Zimmermann, Marcus Mund, and Franz J. Neyer 3. Interactive Motifs and Processes in Old Age Friendship 39 Rebecca G. Adams, Julia Hahmann, and Rosemary Blieszner PART II WHO ARE OUR FRIENDS? 4. The Hackneyed Notions of Adult “Same- Sex” and “Opposite- Sex” Friendships 59 Michael Monsour vi Contents 5. Friendships Across Race, Ethnicity, and Sexual Orientation 75 Suzanna M. Rose and Michelle M. Hospital 6. Friendship and Social Media 93 Andrew M. Ledbetter 7. Friendship and Romance: A Need- Fulfillment Perspective 109 Laura E. VanderDrift, Christopher R. Agnew, and Ezgi Besikci 8. Friendship Among Coworkers 123 Rachel L. Morrison and Helena D. Cooper- Thomas 9. Mentors as Friends 141 Laura Gail Lunsford 10. Animals as Friends: Social Psychological Implications of Human– Pet Relationships 157 Allen R. McConnell, E. Paige Lloyd, and Tonya M. Buchanan PART III FRIENDSHIP AND CONFLICT 11. The Aftermath: Friendship After Romantic Relationship Termination 177 Eddie M. Clark, Priscilla Fernandez, Abigail L. Harris, Michelle Hasan, and Katheryn B. Votaw 12. Transgression, Forgiveness, and Revenge in Friendship 195 Mahzad Hojjat, Susan D. Boon, and Elizabeth B. Lozano 13. Competition in Friendship 213 David R. Hibbard and Gail E. Walton PART IV BENEFITS AND MAINTENANCE OF FRIENDSHIPS 14. Friendship and Health 233 Julianne Holt- Lunstad 15. Friendship and Mental Health Functioning 249 Alan R. King, Tiffany D. Russell, and Amy C. Veith Contents vii 16. Maintaining Long- Lasting Friendships 267 Debra L. Oswald 17. Conclusion: Friendship: An Echo, a Hurrah, and Other Reflections 283 Daniel Perlman Index 301 FOREWORD Friendship is a commonplace notion, familiar to and cherished by people around the world and across history. The capacity for friendship is as fundamental to the human condition as are familial attachment; romantic, conjugal, and sexual lov- ing; competition; and conflict (Brain, 1976). Since the time of Aristotle, friend- ship has been recognized as essential to the well-lived life. However, only in the last 35 years has markedly increased social scientific empirical work emerged address- ing friendship as a distinctive category of human experience, cognitive and moral development, personal and social relationship, and communicative, associational, and political activity (Rawlins, 2009). Despite and perhaps because of its perva- sive presence in human life, the word “friendship” references a vexing, intellectually captivating, continually evolving, and diversely apprehended array of phenomena. In this foreword, I point out why friendship is so vital yet elusive to study, and there- fore why the present volume offers a worthwhile snapshot of this moment in the ever- unfolding saga and study of human friendship. The words “friend” and “friendship” are used to describe a gamut of human relationships— ranging from long- standing attachments of considerable affection and loyalty, to someone just met at a bar or sports event, to a purchased affiliation with a library, museum, or opera house. Further complicating matters, friendship is unique in its capacity to arise as a free- standing relationship on its own terms between two persons, or as a sincerely lived dimension of other relationships, such as the friendship developed between siblings, spouses, parents and children, or cowork- ers. In these instances friendship is not a necessary part of the relationship; countless such bonds exist devoid of friendship. It is a negotiated attachment between per- sons that always reflects shared personal dispositions and material sociocultural pos- sibilities. You cannot force or require friendship of any genuine emotional validity between people; and friendship may be restricted, prohibited, or even unthinkable in certain circumstances. Meanwhile, with the rapid proliferation of social media, the verb forms and related practices of “to friend” and “friending” someone have further ix x Foreword expanded, some would say diluted, the meanings of friendship, an issue I address in what follows. Such varied meanings, coupled with friendship’s contingent and flexible achieve- ment across social settings, make it notoriously difficult to define friendship- con clusively. Even so, I offer here five ideal- typical characteristics for recognizing friendship across diverse circumstances that set the stage for this volume (Rawlins, 1992, 2009). All of these features exist on continua resulting in multiple types and degrees of friendship. First and foremost, friendship is voluntary. People choose to regard and treat another person as a friend; friendship cannot be compelled. This voluntary basis for friendship contrasts with the irrevocable blood- based connec- tion of kin, the legal and religious sanctions of marriage, and the contractual certifi- cation of economic and other partnerships. While all of these bonds, except kinship, may involve initial choices in undertaking the association, factors external to the relationship preserve the bond until and only when external measures are taken to nullify its existence. Some argue that this freely chosen quality of friendship enhances the moral quality of its dedications, even as it makes friendships highly susceptible to external circumstances. Throughout the life course the demands of one’s marriage, family, and/or employment typically take precedence over those of friends— that is, unless these other bonds include friendship as a dimension, which can pose other challenges. There is wide disparity in the degree to which friendships are freely chosen and the extent to which they are a function of their social con- text. For example, it is often prudent to become friends with professional associates or seemingly necessary in specific settings to befriend those who share one’s social position, privileges, or plight. Second, friendship is a personal relationship. We live in friendship with some- one because of that person’s individual qualities, not simply because of member- ship in a certain class or category. This person- qua- person orientation of friendship, or friendship for the other’s own sake, is considered essential for true friendship (Aristotle, 1980; Suttles, 1970). Nonetheless, actual friendships vary in the degree to which dedication to sheer personhood takes precedence. We may in fact become and remain friends with others because of their singular embodiment of a categori- cal virtue or commitment to a social cause that we share. Third, friendship is an affective bond— an emotional attachment. Persons care about, like, and may pro- foundly love their friends. Again, however, the depth of affect between friends may range from merely a situational, positive disposition to a lifelong devotion. Fourth, friendship is a mutual relationship. As a free- standing bond, friendship is inherently relational; it is accomplished and sustained communicatively and through shared activities demonstrating each person’s regard for the other. A one- sided stance of friendship toward another is only would- be friendship. Persons remain friends to the extent that they continue to meet mutually developed expec- tations and standards for worthwhile behavior. Fifth and finally, friendship tends toward an equal relationship. Although friends may differ in their personal attributes Foreword xi or social station, friendship involves identifying areas of the relationship where the friends stand as equals. As C. S.
Recommended publications
  • Todd Rundgren to Perform at Four Winds Casinos on June 7
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE TODD RUNDGREN TO PERFORM AT SILVER CREEK EVENT CENTER, FOUR WINDS NEW BUFFALO, ON FRIDAY, JUNE 7 CORRECTED TICKET SALE DATE: Tickets go on sale Friday, March 29 at 10 a.m. ET NEW BUFFALO, Mich. – March 26, 2019 – The Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians’ Four Winds® Casinos are pleased to announce Todd Rundgren will perform at Silver Creek® Event Center on Friday, June 7, 2019 at 9 p.m. ET. Ticket prices for the show start at $29 plus applicable fees and can be purchased beginning Friday, March 29 at 10 a.m. ET by visiting FourWindsCasino.com, or by calling (800) 745-3000. Hotel rooms are available on the night of the Todd Rundgren performance and can be purchased with event tickets. As a songwriter, video pioneer, producer, recording artist, computer software developer, conceptualist, and interactive artist (re-designated TR-i), Rundgren has made a lasting impact on both the form and content of popular music. Born and raised in Philadelphia, Rundgren began playing guitar as a teenager, founded the band The Nazz, before launching a solo career. 1972's Something/Anything? prompted the press to dub him 'Rock's New Wunderkind'. It was followed by several albums and hit singles, among them I Saw The Light, Hello It's Me, Can We Still Be Friends, and Bang The Drum. As a producer, Rundgren has worked with Patti Smith, Cheap Trick, Psychedelic Furs, Meatloaf, XTC, Grand Funk Railroad, and Hall And Oates. He composed all the music and lyrics for Joe Papp's 1989 Off-Broadway production of Joe Orton's Up Against It and composed the music for a number of television series, including Pee Wee’s Playhouse and Crime Story.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Rebound Relationship?
    What Is A Rebound Relationship? By Nina Atwood What is the definition of a "rebound relationship"? Is it true they can be unhealthy? - David Rebound relationships occur very shortly after the Commitment hunger. "My last boyfriend dated end of a significant love, and sometimes begin me for three years without making a commitment, before the end. The problem with a rebound is that so I'm expecting an engagement ring within six it doesn't allow time for the grieving and healing months or I'm out of here." process to be complete. Chronic fear and anxiety. "After what my ex did When this happens, there is emotional confusion. to me, I have to constantly check to see that you're Sometimes, the feelings for the old partner simply really there for me, even if that drives you crazy." transfer to the new one, and that results in the illusion that you've found someone totally Skyrocket relationship. Rebound dating "different," when, in fact, you've found someone relationships are often too fast-paced, with a false very much like your old love. Often the issues that sense of urgency, in order to "make sure" that this drove you away from your previous partner are the one sticks. very ones with which you eventually find yourself grappling in the new relationship. The biggest risk of a rebound is that it serves its purpose and then the re-bounder moves on, Rebound relationships serve a purpose: To protect leaving someone else devastated. If you're dating the heart from the devastation of losing someone someone who has just left another relationship, very important.
    [Show full text]
  • Friendship Characteristics, Threat Appraisals, and Varieties of Jealousy About Romantic Partners’ Friendships
    Interpersona | An International Journal on Personal Relationships interpersona.psychopen.eu | 1981-6472 Articles Friendship Characteristics, Threat Appraisals, and Varieties of Jealousy About Romantic Partners’ Friendships Timothy R. Worley* a, Jennifer Samp b [a] Murray State University, Murray, KY, USA. [b] Department of Communication Studies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. Abstract This study examined the role of friendship sex composition, friendship history, and threat appraisals in the experience of jealousy about a romantic partner’s involvement in extradyadic friendships. Using a survey, 201 individuals responded to scenarios describing a romantic partner’s involvement in a significant friendship outside the romantic dyad. A partner’s involvement in a cross-sex friendship was associated with greater perceptions of threat to both the existence and quality of the romantic relationship than was a partner’s involvement in a same-sex friendship. Further, the specific forms of jealousy experienced about partners’ friendships were dependent on the threat appraisals individuals associated with the friendships. Appraisals of relational existence threat mediated the influence of friendship characteristics (i.e., sex composition and history) on sexual jealousy and companionship jealousy, while appraisals of relational quality threat mediated the influence of friendship characteristics on intimacy jealousy, power jealousy, and companionship jealousy. This study points toward the central role of threat appraisals in mediating associations between rival characteristics and various forms of jealousy about a partner’s friendships. Keywords: jealousy, friendship, threat appraisals, cross-sex friendships Interpersona, 2014, Vol. 8(2), 231–244, doi:10.5964/ijpr.v8i2.169 Received: 2014-07-02. Accepted: 2014-10-29. Published (VoR): 2014-12-19.
    [Show full text]
  • First Evidence of Multiple Paternity in the Bull Shark (Carcharhinus Leucas) Agathe Pirog, Sébastien Jaquemet, Marc Soria, Hélène Magalon
    First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) Agathe Pirog, Sébastien Jaquemet, Marc Soria, Hélène Magalon To cite this version: Agathe Pirog, Sébastien Jaquemet, Marc Soria, Hélène Magalon. First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas). Marine and Freshwater Research, CSIRO Publishing, 2015, 10.1071/mf15255. hal-01253775 HAL Id: hal-01253775 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01253775 Submitted on 4 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. First evidence of multiple paternity in the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) Agathe PirogA, Se´bastien JaquemetA,B, Marc SoriaC and He´le`ne MagalonA,B,D AUniversite´ de La Re´union, UMR 9220 ENTROPIE (Universite´ de La Re´union/IRD/CNRS), 15 Avenue Rene´ Cassin, CS 92003, F-97744 Saint Denis Cedex 09, La Re´union, France. BLaboratory of Excellence CORAIL, 58, Avenue Paul Alduy, F-66860 Perpignan Cedex, France. CIRD Re´union, UMR 248 MARBEC, CS 41095 2 rue Joseph Wetzell, F-97492 Sainte-Clotilde, La Re´union, France. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The present study assessed the occurrence of multiple paternity in four litters of bull shark Carcharhinus leucas (n ¼ 5, 8, 9 and 11 embryos) sampled at Reunion Island in the Western Indian Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Communicative Infidelity on Relationship Outcomes
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2009 Stay or leave? The effects of communicative infidelity on relationship outcomes Colleen C. Malachowski West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Malachowski, Colleen C., "Stay or leave? The effects of communicative infidelity on relationship outcomes" (2009). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 794. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/794 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stay or Leave? The Effects of Communicative Infidelity on Relationship Outcomes Colleen C. Malachowski Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communication Theory and Research Megan R. Dillow, Ph.D., Chair Maria Brann, Ph.D. Keith Weber, Ed.D. Department of Communication Studies Morgantown, West Virginia 2009 Keywords: Communicative Infidelity; Investment Model; Forgiveness; Exit; Voice; Neglect ABSTRACT Stay or Leave? The Effects of Communicative Infidelity on Relationship Outcomes Colleen C.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Marketing
    Relationship Marketing Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Customer Satisfaction and Customer Retention Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH Thorsten Hennig-Thurau . Ursula Hansen Editors Relationship Marketing Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Customer Satisfaction and Customer Retention With 80 Figures and 24 Tables Springer Dr. Thorsten Hennig-Thurau Prof. Dr. Ursula Hansen University of Hannover Department of Marketing Koenigsworther Platz 1 30167 Hannover Germany ISBN 978-3-642-08622-9 ISBN 978-3-662-09745-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-09745-8 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Relationship marketing: gaining competitive advantage through customer satisfaction and customer retention; with 24 tables 1 Thorsten Hennig-Thurau; Ursula Hansen, ed. - Berlin; Heidelberg; New York; Barcelona; Hong Kong; London; Milan; Paris; Singapore; Tokyo: Springer, 2000 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illus­ trations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag. Viola­ tions are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000 Originally published by Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York in 2000. Softcover reprint of the hardcover I st edition 2000 The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publica­ tion does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Studies About Sex: Implications for Relationships, Health, Culture, and Identity
    Communication studies about sex: Implications for relationships, health, culture, and identity. A review Jimmie Manning Nota: Este artículo se puede leer en español en: http://www.profesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2021/ene/manning_espanol.pdf How to cite this article: Manning, Jimmie (2021). “Communication studies about sex: Implications for relationships, health, culture, and identity. A review”. Profesional de la información, v. 30, n. 1, e300114. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.ene.14 Invited manuscript received on February, 2nd 2020 Jimmie Manning https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-8005 University of Nevada School of Social Research & Justice Studies Communication Studies - Mail Stop 0229 1664 N. Virginia Ave. Reno, NV 89577 USA [email protected] Abstract This article features a review of communication scholarship about sex from the past two decades (2000-2020). A typo- graphic analysis of relevant research reveals 11 primary topic areas related to how interpersonal sexual communication is commonly researched in communication studies. Six of these topic areas are relationship-oriented in nature: flirting and initiation; pleasure and desire; sexual expectations; relational and sexual satisfaction; communication after sex; and negative aspects of sex and sexuality. Three of the topics are health-oriented in nature: sex education, especially in consideration of how parent-child talk happens in families; negotiation of safe sex practices; and sexual dysfunction. Finally, two of the topics are cultural in nature: social factors and influences; and media influences and representations. Scholarship is also reviewed in terms of theoretical commitments, with most research following sociopsychological or critical traditions but with a noteworthy number also embracing sociocultural or biological paradigms.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Humans Have Sex
    Arch Sex Behav (2007) 36:477–507 DOI 10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Why Humans Have Sex Cindy M. Meston Æ David M. Buss Received: 20 December 2005 / Revised: 18 July 2006 / Accepted: 24 September 2006 / Published online: 3 July 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract Historically, the reasons people have sex have Keywords Sexual motivation Á Sexual intercourse Á been assumed to be few in number and simple in nature–to Gender differences reproduce, to experience pleasure, or to relieve sexual tension. Several theoretical perspectives suggest that mo- tives for engaging in sexual intercourse may be larger in Introduction number and psychologically complex in nature. Study 1 used a nomination procedure that identified 237 expressed Why people have sex is an extremely important, but reasons for having sex, ranging from the mundane (e.g., ‘‘I surprisingly little studied topic. One reason for its relative wanted to experience physical pleasure’’) to the spiritual neglect is that scientists might simply assume that the (e.g., ‘‘I wanted to get closer to God’’), from altruistic (e.g., answers are obvious: to experience sexual pleasure, to ‘‘I wanted the person to feel good about himself/herself’’) relieve sexual tension, or to reproduce. Previous research to vengeful (e.g., ‘‘I wanted to get back at my partner for already tells us that the answers cannot be as few or having cheated on me’’). Study 2 asked participants psychologically simple. Leigh (1989), for example, docu- (N = 1,549) to evaluate the degree to which each of the 237 mented seven reasons for sex: pure pleasure, to express reasons had led them to have sexual intercourse.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781412929998.Pdf
    Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007 10:39 AM Page i Human Relationships Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007 10:39 AM Page ii Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007 10:39 AM Page iii Human Relationships 4th Edition Steve Duck Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007 10:39 AM Page iv © Steve Duck 2007 First published 2007 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. SAGE Publications Ltd 1 Oliver’s Yard 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP SAGE Publications Inc. 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320 SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044 India SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte Ltd 33 Pekin Street #02-01 Far East Square Singapore 048763 British Library Cataloguing in Publication data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-4129-2998-1 ISBN 978-1-4129-2999-8 (pbk) Library of Congress Control Number: 2006929060 Typeset by C&M Digitals (P) Ltd, Chennai, India Printed in Great Britain by The Alden Press, Witney Printed on paper from sustainable resources Duck-3494-Prelims.qxd 1/16/2007
    [Show full text]
  • Degrees of Freedom
    February 2015 D of F EXPANDING COLLEGE OPPORTUNITIES for Currently and Formerly Incarcerated Californians Stanford Criminal Justice Center Chief Justice Earl Warren Stanford Law School Institute on Law and Social Policy UC Berkeley School of Law DEGREES OF FREEDOM: Expanding College Opportunities for Currently and Formerly Incarcerated Californians February 2015 A report of the Renewing Communities Initiative Acknowledgements This report was co-written by Debbie Mukamal, Rebecca Silbert, and Rebecca M. Taylor. This report is part of a larger initiative – Renewing Communities – to expand college opportunities for currently and formerly incarcerated students in California. Nicole Lindahl was a contributing author; Nicole Lindahl and Laura Van Tassel also provided research assistance for this report. The research and publication of this report has been supported by the Ford Foundation. The authors thank Douglas Wood of the Ford Foundation for his vision and leadership which catapulted this report. The authors are grateful to the many people who provided information, experience, and guidance in the development of this report. These individuals are listed in Appendix A. Any errors or misstatements in this report are the responsibility of the authors; the recommendations made herein may, or may not, be supported by the individuals listed in Appendix A. Founded in 2005, the Stanford Criminal Justice Center serves as a research and policy institute on issues related to the criminal justice system. Its efforts are geared towards both generating policy research for the public sector, as well as providing pedagogical opportunities to Stanford Law School students with academic or career interests in criminal law and crime policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Grounds
    Grounds of Marriage Nullity The following are the possible grounds that can be used in a marriage case before a Tribunal. There is a brief description and a list of questions relating to each ground. The judges decide each case solely on the basis of whether the grounds are proven by the testimony submitted by the parties, their witnesses, and expert consultants. If you are starting a marriage case with the Tribunal, the Case Assessor will help you to suggest or propose grounds for your case. If you have already started a case, or if you are a Respondent in a case, your Advocate can help you to understand the grounds. If you believe that one or more grounds may be applicable to your case, the questions will help you in selecting possible witnesses. Witnesses will be asked questions related to the ground or grounds used in the case. Every marriage case must have at least one ground. At the beginning of the process, the parties suggest possible grounds and explain in written statements why they believe those grounds apply to their case. After both parties have had the opportunity to do this, the Judges will set the actual ground or grounds for the case. The parties will be notified of the grounds. They may express their objections to the chosen grounds if they so choose, and the Judges may then reconsider. The Judges may select several grounds at the beginning of the case; the testimony of the parties and witnesses will determine which is the best ground on which to judge the case in the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Todd Rundgren: “Back to the Bars ”
    Serving DeKalb Community College Vol. \A Friday, March 30, 1979 Page 1 Scott is just not a good businessman.” This week’s edition of The Open Door is only four pages in length because of the Spring break. The paper will return to its —John Truelove regular 8-page editions starting next week. Photo by B. Maher A* by Bill Maher According to a report in Activity Calander the Thursday, March 22,1979 issue of the Atlanta Journal, The following is a list of the already scheduled activities for the chairman of the DeKalb the month of April. County School Board will not April support the renewal of 3 - InterClub Council Meeting. 2:15 p.m r President W. Wayne Scott’s 3 - Student Government Association Meeting. 3:15 p.m. contract for another year. 10 - Student Government Association meeting. 3:15 p.m School Board Chairman 11 - Tech Rap Committee - Technical Division and College Trustee John Truelove told the Journal Spring Fling. 11:00 (activities hour) that, "Dr. Scott is just not a 17 - InterClub Council meeting. 2:15 p.m. good businessman.” 17 - Student Government Association. 3:15 p.m. Truelove also said that the 18 - Inter-Varsity sponsors a contemporary gospel concert. school board urged Scott to 11:00 a.m. place his children in public 24 - Student Government Association meeting. 3:15 p.m. school soon after he was 25 - Club meetings hired. Scott complied with the wishes of the board but- President Scott. Is his job on the line? put the children back into told us he was doing it.” Board has no stated policy SGA Meetings private schools last Dr.
    [Show full text]