System Variants for Operation of Trams Without a Catenary Keywords

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

System Variants for Operation of Trams Without a Catenary Keywords System variants for operation of trams without a catenary Dr. Karsten Rechenberg, Markus Gaudenz Siemens AG TS GT E 1 Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 67 91052 Erlangen, Germany Phone: +49 (9131) 7-23834 / Fax: +49 (9131) 7-23362 [email protected] [email protected] URL: www.siemens.com Keywords Hybrid vehicles, Traction, Electric vehicles Abstract This paper deals with possible tram operations without a catenary, taking advantage of an on-board electrical energy storage. A system like this is very interesting in certain cases of operation, e.g. driving through historical city centers without a catenary, using energy stored in SuperCapacitor- modules instead. In order to compare different kinds of feasible solutions technical and investment costs have to be considered. Another objective to operate without a catenary is to increase energy efficiency in comparison to conventional trams, particularly by transferring the braking energy into the electrical energy storage of SuperCapacitors. Motivation Many efforts were made within the last few years to minimize the power consumption of rail vehicles. The efficiency of the traction system was increased by reducing electrical and mechanical losses, the aerodynamic design of vehicles was modified in order to minimize the air resistance and many other actions were taken. One approach has not been considered thoroughly so far: Storing the kinetic energy during the time of braking in order to reduce the amount of energy needed for the next acceleration. Why was this approach outside the field of R&D interest? Because no suitable energy storage was available for the high requirements of railway vehicles. Recently SuperCaps with sufficient energy content had been developed. BELFORT_2004.DOC/1 von 6 SuperCap or Flywheel? What kind of energy storage became reasonable within the last years for railway applications? We have to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the electrical storage SuperCap and the mechanical storage Flywheel. It is true that the Flywheel is able to store a high amount of energy, but the power to charge and uncharge is limited (250 kW @ 5 kWh). This would lead to an unreasonable relation between the size of the energy storage and the needed rate of power. Also, the high kinetic energy means a high potential risk of violation for passengers and bystanders in case of vehicle crash. On the other hand the SuperCap is an electrical energy storage that easily can be integrated in the conventional electrical drive system. In opposite to the flywheel this system can provide the whole energy content within a few seconds. The effect of accidents or damage of the SuperCaps can be reduced by adequate means. Beyond that we are convinced that the possibilities of SuperCaps are much higher than the ones of a flywheel. Saving energy The recent development of storage technology on the base of SuperCaps allows us today to use them efficiently as traction energy storage in trams. Therefore the total energy consumption can be reduced by storing the kinetic energy during the braking phase of the tram. The following figure shows a typical speed profile with its separate phases of a urban vehicle traveling from one stop to the next. P [kW] F Ztraction,max F [kN] traction v v [km/h] max P max Edrive, max P aux phase 1 phase 2 phase 3 phase 4 phase 5 time [s] accelerating constant speed coasting braking stop Ebrake, max Fig. 1: Typical speed profile of a metro vehicle In order to get rid of the catenary, the power to accelerate has to be provided by a source or storage inside the vehicle. As indicated in figure 1 it is not sufficient to use only the energy from the phase of deceleration due to losses. The difference of the areas above and below the time-axes must be provided from an energy source. Here an on board diesel engine or a fast charging equipment at every stop of the vehicle can provide the needed amount of energy. So only the losses during a cycle must be provided, the main part will be used from the energy storage. BELFORT_2004.DOC/2 von 6 Integration of the storage into the vehicle After having found the best type of energy storage this device has to be integrated into the traction system of the vehicle. The figure below shows a possible integration of a combustion engine and SuperCap energy storage into the a conventional drive system. Pantograph DC 750 V Cooling SAR M 3 3 Auxiliaries converter 3 M DC 750-V container PWMI 3 Cooling G 3 DM 3 M 3 3 3 M DC 750-V container PWMI 3 Fig. 2: Vehicle concept for integration of on energy storage and an independent on-board energy source into a conventional drive system On the left side are the energy sources: the 750 V voltage from the pantograph and, in order to replace a conventional catenary system, a diesel engine. The outlined 750 V connection necessarily has not to be an ordinary catenery system, a charging unit installed at the stops might be used instead. We call this voltage the “supply voltage”. The energy storage of the SuperCaps are linked to a DC/DC converter. This converter is controlling the charging and uncharging operations of the storage. The converter is needed because the voltage of the DC link capacitor is approximately as high as the suppling voltage. On the other side of the converter the voltage of the SuperCaps depends on the energy content of the storage. This way of connecting the storage can be realized easily with the possibilities of Siemens standard traction converters (SIBAC) and ensures an efficient operation of a tram. It results that the advantage of the SuperCap as a electrical storage for the integration in comparison to the flywheel is evident. Vehicle operation without catenary – a survey of different systems In conclusion of the previous sections we decide to use SuperCaps in storage applications. As explained above, we have to recover the losses of the propulsion system, driving resistance, potential energy and auxiliaries. The necessary energy might be taken from a combusting engine or from a charging unit at the stops. The following systems are configurations for operating without a catenary: System 1: − Stationary charging stations with SuperCaps integrated at the stop. BELFORT_2004.DOC/3 von 6 − Tram travels from one charging station to the next. − Mobile storage is charged during the time (about 15 sec) at the stop. System 2: − SuperCap storage is charged by an energy source that is permanent on board (diesel; in future: fuel cells) System 3: − Combination of both systems The systems 1 is only applicable for theoretical reviews. In practice it is not suitable, because a tram often runs within the individual traffic of cars and buses. So stops and their duration are unpredictable. In case of traffic jams the time between two charging stops might be to long to provide enough power to the auxiliary system (e.g. air condition, lights etc.). In that case the storage runs empty and it is impossible to reach the next stop for charging. To avoid this case it is necessary to carry a small energy source (exceptionally battery). The choice for a specific project depends on various parameters like number of vehicles, length of the tracks, environmental regulations, noise emission and other requirements. In simulations many possibilities were compared. An optimum was found for an example of a 16 km track (double) with typical distances between the stops. The results are shown in Table I. The system 2 is chosen that only the kinetic energy during braking is fed into the SuperCap. Design strategy Number of Design of the Number and stationary mobile energy size of diesel annotation charging storage engines per stations (16 vehicle km/double tracked) Conventional track electrification 0 0 0 catenary SYSTEM 1: 33 6.7 kWh 0 Pure energy storage operation SYSTEM 2: 0 2.2 kWh 2 x 180 kW Diesel-electric operation with energy storage without SYSTEM 3/1: 27 5.6 kWh 1 x 50 kW catenary Energy storage operation with auxiliary diesel engine and charging at the stops SYSTEM 3/2: 24 3.3 kWh 1 x 180 kW Diesel-electric operation with energy storage and charging at the stops Table I: Values for storages, the charging units and the energy source of different systems The following diagram presents the results of simulations on the base of the four systems. The most important value is the energy consumption. It can be seen easily that a reduction of more than 20% in comparison to an already optimistic conventional system with catenary (30% of the braking energy BELFORT_2004.DOC/4 von 6 can be fed into the grid during braking) can be reached. The higher the rating of the diesel engine the lower the value of the energy, that has to be stored in the SuperCaps. So the optimum in combining system 1 and system 2 strongly depends on the current prices of the SuperCaps, energy costs and the aleady above mentioned operating datas. The difference in energy consumption between the systems can be explained by having a look at the losses of the system. Due to the high currents during the short charging period at the stops we have a lower efficiency in comparison to the other systems. In system 2 the size of the energy storage is calculated on the base of the needed energy for acceleration. Therefore it is not able to store the whole kinetic energy of the vehicle. The excessive energy has to be converted in thermical losses in the braking resistor. The variants of system 3 overcome these disadvantages by combining the advantages of system 1 and 2.
Recommended publications
  • Jational Register of Historic Places Inventory -- Nomination Form
    •m No. 10-300 REV. (9/77) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE JATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS >_____ NAME HISTORIC BROADWAY THEATER AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICT________________________ AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER <f' 300-8^9 ^tttff Broadway —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Los Angeles VICINITY OF 25 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 Los Angeles 037 | CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^.OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED .^COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE .XBOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ^ENTERTAINMENT _ REUGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS 2L.YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: NAME Multiple Ownership (see list) STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE VICINITY OF | LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDSETC. Los Angeie s County Hall of Records STREET & NUMBER 320 West Temple Street CITY. TOWN STATE Los Angeles California ! REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TiTLE California Historic Resources Inventory DATE July 1977 —FEDERAL ^JSTATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS office of Historic Preservation CITY, TOWN STATE . ,. Los Angeles California DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE X.GOOD 0 —RUINS X_ALTERED _MOVED DATE- —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Broadway Theater and Commercial District is a six-block complex of predominately commercial and entertainment structures done in a variety of architectural styles. The district extends along both sides of Broadway from Third to Ninth Streets and exhibits a number of structures in varying condition and degree of alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) Stab-Lok Breakers and Panelboards
    Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) Stab-Lok Breakers and Panelboards HSB, part of Munich Re, is a What is the best course of action when discovered? technology-driven company built on a foundation of specialty insurance, engineering and technology, all Federal Pacific Electric Company (FPE) manufactured many electrical products working together to drive innovation while in business including a panelboard and breaker line called Stab-Lok. The in a modern world. Stab-Lok products are no longer manufactured, but millions had been installed in residential and commercial buildings between 1950 and 1985. The purpose of the breaker is to protect the building from fire in the event of an electrical circuit abnormality. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) investigated many reports in 1982 of Stab-Lok breakers failing to trip as required by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) testing standards. The CPSC did not have the funding to further investigate this problem or arrive at a definitive conclusion. Tests by the CPSC and independent consulting engineers concluded that certain Stab-Lok breakers do not trip according to UL requirements and in some cases, can jam in the “on” position. In addition, overheating problems have been found within the panelboard internal bus connections. Unfortunately, this information surfaced after many Stab-Lokinstallations were completed and had been in service for years. In 2002, a New Jersey class-action lawsuit decided that the manufacturer of the Stab-Lok breakers committed fraud over many years in issuing UL labels to products they knew did not meet the UL testing requirements. HSB Page 2/2 Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) Stab-Lok Breakers and Panelboards The National Electrical Code requires that all installed products must be listed and labeled by an independent testing agency to be acceptable for the intended use.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Commerce Commission Washington
    INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION WASHINGTON REPORT NO. 3374 PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY IN BE ACCIDENT AT LOS ANGELES, CALIF., ON OCTOBER 10, 1950 - 2 - Report No. 3374 SUMMARY Date: October 10, 1950 Railroad: Pacific Electric Lo cation: Los Angeles, Calif. Kind of accident: Rear-end collision Trains involved; Freight Passenger Train numbers: Extra 1611 North 2113 Engine numbers: Electric locomo­ tive 1611 Consists: 2 muitiple-uelt 10 cars, caboose passenger cars Estimated speeds: 10 m. p h, Standing ft Operation: Timetable and operating rules Tracks: Four; tangent; ] percent descending grade northward Weather: Dense fog Time: 6:11 a. m. Casualties: 50 injured Cause: Failure properly to control speed of the following train in accordance with flagman's instructions - 3 - INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORT NO, 3374 IN THE MATTER OF MAKING ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORTS UNDER THE ACCIDENT REPORTS ACT OF MAY 6, 1910. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY January 5, 1951 Accident at Los Angeles, Calif., on October 10, 1950, caused by failure properly to control the speed of the following train in accordance with flagman's instructions. 1 REPORT OF THE COMMISSION PATTERSON, Commissioner: On October 10, 1950, there was a rear-end collision between a freight train and a passenger train on the Pacific Electric Railway at Los Angeles, Calif., which resulted in the injury of 48 passengers and 2 employees. This accident was investigated in conjunction with a representative of the Railroad Commission of the State of California. 1 Under authority of section 17 (2) of the Interstate Com­ merce Act the above-entitled proceeding was referred by the Commission to Commissioner Patterson for consideration and disposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice Template Instructions
    Template Instructions Importing Templates into Best Practice Templates are usually in the form of a .rtf (Rich Text File) file. They must not be opened except in Best Practice. To import them into Best Practice: 1. Right-mouse click on the file and select Save Target As. Go to the folder or location on the hard drive of the computer where you want to save it, and select Save. 2. Start the Correspondence Out module (either from the main menu or from within a patient record from the menu bar) 3. Click Template > Import Template from the Menu Bar 4. Find and select the template file to be imported, and either double-click on it or press 'open'- this will import the template into Best Practice 8. Then click File > Page setup and change ALL margins to 5mm this will modify the page to suit the layout of this template. 9. Save the template by selecting File > Save as from the Menu Bar 10. Type in a new name for the template and click on the box Available to All Users depending on who is to have access to the template 11. Click Save 12. This will save the template under the Custom tab Using Templates To create a letter or document based on a template, you must open Correspondence Out from within a patient record. 1. Select File > New from the Menu Bar or click on the New Document icon 2. Highlight the template to be used under the Custom, Supplied or All 3. Respond to any prompts for addressees, dates, drop-down boxes, etc 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority Meeting Council Chambers, City Hall, 104 S
    MINUTES OF CLAREMORE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 104 S. MUSKOGEE, CLAREMORE, OKLAHOMA MARCH 03, 2008 CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order by Mayor Brant Shallenburger at 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Nan Pope called roll. The following were: Present: Brant Shallenburger, Buddy Robertson, Tony Mullenger, Flo Guthrie, Mick Webber, Terry Chase, Tom Lehman, Paula Watson Absent: Don Myers Staff Present: City Manager Troy Powell, Nan Pope, Serena Kauk, Matt Mueller, Randy Elliott, Cassie Sowers, Phil Stowell, Steve Lett, Daryl Golbek, Joe Kays, Gene Edwards, Tim Miller, Tamryn Cluck, Mark Dowler Pledge of Allegiance by all. Invocation by James Graham, Verdigris United Methodist Church. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman that the agenda for the regular CPWA meeting of March 03, 2008, be approved as written. 8 yes, Mullenger, Lehman, Robertson, Guthrie, Shallenburger, Webber, Chase, Watson. ITEMS UNFORESEEN AT THE TIME AGENDA WAS POSTED None CALL TO THE PUBLIC None CURRENT BUSINESS Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman to approve the following consent items: (a) Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority meeting on February 18, 2008, as printed. (b) All claims as printed. (c) Approve budget supplement for upgrading the electric distribution system and adding an additional Substation for the new Oklahoma Plaza Development - $586,985 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (d) Approve budget supplement for purchase of an additional concrete control house for new Substation #5 for Oklahoma Plaza Development - $93,946 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (e) Approve budget supplement for electrical engineering contract with Ledbetter, Corner and Associates for engineering design phase for Substation #5 - Oklahoma Plaza Development - $198,488 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Connectivity and Accessibility Between Tram Stops and Public Facilities: a Case Study in the Historic Cities of Europe
    Urban Street Design & Planning 73 A study on connectivity and accessibility between tram stops and public facilities: a case study in the historic cities of Europe Y. Kitao1 & K. Hirano2 1Kyoto Women’s University, Japan 2Kei Atelier, Yame, Fukuoka, Japan Abstract The purpose of this paper is to understand urban structures in terms of tram networks by using the examples of historic cities in Europe. We have incorporated the concept of interconnectivity and accessibility between public facilities and tram stops to examine how European cities, which have built world class public transportation systems, use the tram network in relationship to their public facilities. We selected western European tram-type cities which have a bus system, but no subway system, and we focused on 24 historic cities with populations from 100,000 to 200,000, which is the optimum size for a large-scale community. In order to analyze the relationship, we mapped the ‘pedestrian accessible area’ from any tram station in the city, and analyzed how many public facilities and pedestrian streets were in this area. As a result, we were able to compare the urban space structures of these cities in terms of the accessibility and connectivity between their tram stops and their public facilities. Thus we could understand the features which determined the relationship between urban space and urban facilities. This enabled us to evaluate which of our target cities was the most pedestrian orientated city. Finally, we were able to define five categories of tram-type cities. These findings have provided us with a means to recognize the urban space structure of a city, which will help us to improve city planning in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA
    Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA Matthew Barrett Metro Transportation Research Library, Archive & Public Records - metro.net/library Transportation Research Library & Archive • Originally the library of the Los • Transportation research library for Angeles Railway (1895-1945), employees, consultants, students, and intended to serve as both academics, other government public outreach and an agencies and the general public. employee resource. • Partner of the National • Repository of federally funded Transportation Library, member of transportation research starting Transportation Knowledge in 1971. Networks, and affiliate of the National Academies’ Transportation • Began computer cataloging into Research Board (TRB). OCLC’s World Catalog using Library of Congress Subject • Largest transit operator-owned Headings and honoring library, forth largest transportation interlibrary loan requests from library collection after U.C. outside institutions in 1978. Berkeley, Northwestern University and the U.S. DOT’s Volpe Center. • Archive of Los Angeles transit history from 1873-present. • Member of Getty/USC’s L.A. as Subject forum. Accessing the Library • Online: metro.net/library – Library Catalog librarycat.metro.net – Daily aggregated transportation news headlines: headlines.metroprimaryresources.info – Highlights of current and historical documents in our collection: metroprimaryresources.info – Photos: flickr.com/metrolibraryarchive – Film/Video: youtube/metrolibrarian – Social Media: facebook, twitter, tumblr, google+,
    [Show full text]
  • VOLT Owner's Manual
    19_CHEV_VOLT_COV_en_US_84044803A_2018JUN22.ai 1 6/14/2018 10:17:33 AM 2019 VOLT C M Y CM MY CY CMY VOLT K Owner’s Manual 84044803 A Chevrolet VOLT Owner Manual (GMNA-Localizing-U.S./Canada/Mexico- 12163007) - 2019 - crc - 6/11/18 Contents Introduction . 2 In Brief . 5 Keys, Doors, and Windows . 30 Seats and Restraints . 52 Storage . 99 Instruments and Controls . 102 Lighting . 143 Infotainment System . 150 Climate Controls . 151 Driving and Operating . 158 Vehicle Care . 236 Service and Maintenance . 321 Technical Data . 334 Customer Information . 337 Reporting Safety Defects . 348 OnStar . 351 Connected Services . 359 Index . 363 Chevrolet VOLT Owner Manual (GMNA-Localizing-U.S./Canada/Mexico- 12163007) - 2019 - crc - 6/11/18 2 Introduction Introduction This manual describes features that Helm, Incorporated may or may not be on the vehicle Attention: Customer Service because of optional equipment that 47911 Halyard Drive was not purchased on the vehicle, Plymouth, MI 48170 model variants, country USA specifications, features/applications that may not be available in your Using this Manual region, or changes subsequent to To quickly locate information about the printing of this owner’s manual. the vehicle, use the Index in the The names, logos, emblems, Refer to the purchase back of the manual. It is an slogans, vehicle model names, and documentation relating to your alphabetical list of what is in the vehicle body designs appearing in specific vehicle to confirm the manual and the page number where this manual including, but not limited features. it can be found. to, GM, the GM logo, CHEVROLET, the CHEVROLET Emblem, VOLT, Keep this manual in the vehicle for and the VOLT logo are trademarks quick reference.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neighborly Substation the Neighborly Substation Electricity, Zoning, and Urban Design
    MANHATTAN INSTITUTE CENTER FORTHE RETHINKING DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION Hope Cohen 2008 er B ecem D THE NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION THE NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION Electricity, Zoning, and Urban Design Hope Cohen Deputy Director Center for Rethinking Development Manhattan Institute In 1879, the remarkable thing about Edison’s new lightbulb was that it didn’t burst into flames as soon as it was lit. That disposed of the first key problem of the electrical age: how to confine and tame electricity to the point where it could be usefully integrated into offices, homes, and every corner of daily life. Edison then designed and built six twenty-seven-ton, hundred-kilowatt “Jumbo” Engine-Driven Dynamos, deployed them in lower Manhattan, and the rest is history. “We will make electric light so cheap,” Edison promised, “that only the rich will be able to burn candles.” There was more taming to come first, however. An electrical fire caused by faulty wiring seriously FOREWORD damaged the library at one of Edison’s early installations—J. P. Morgan’s Madison Avenue brownstone. Fast-forward to the massive blackout of August 2003. Batteries and standby generators kicked in to keep trading alive on the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. But the Amex failed to open—it had backup generators for the trading-floor computers but depended on Consolidated Edison to cool them, so that they wouldn’t melt into puddles of silicon. Banks kept their ATM-control computers running at their central offices, but most of the ATMs themselves went dead. Cell-phone service deteriorated fast, because soaring call volumes quickly drained the cell- tower backup batteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Google Document and Sharing the Link in Schoology
    Creating a Google Document and Sharing the Link in Schoology 1. Begin by creating your Google Doc that you want to share with your students. 2. Click on the share button in the upper right corner. If you do not allow your students access you will have to grant them access one at a time when they request access. This is a sample message that they would receive. 3. In order to avoid that message click on Share>Advanced. ​ 4. Click on Change… a new box will open and click On ­ Anyone with the link then select Access: Can ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ View>Save. 5. The Link to Share will be highlighted, and it looks something like the link below. ​ ​ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hYnvd_08Lx8AZOBFYWLTVJKUAAEsi5KJJMeVjMmf­q4/edit?u ​ ​ sp=sharing 6. If you want it to force the students to make a copy upon opening the Google Document you will just replace the word edit with the word copy. If you don’t edit the link your students will open a “View ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Only” copy then they will have to make a copy for themselves. 7. Now, log into Schoology and Add Assignment. ​ ​ 8. Follow the steps to add the assignment. 9. Name the Assignment (Remember that the assignment name will be what appears in Skyward if you sync this grade). 10. Add any directions in the description section. 11. Click on the link button to add a link to the assignment. 12. This is where you will put the shared link from Google Drive. See # 5, and remember to replace the word edit with the word copy to force students to make a copy as soon as opening the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Pacific Electric Panels
    Federal Pacific Electric Panels Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) panels do not meet today’s current safety code standards. The Consumer Product Safety Fact: There are millions of Federal Commission (CPSC) found that the material used to make Pacific circuit breaker panels the breakers is sub-standard, which may prevent a breaker currently being used in the U.S. from effectively working. Thus, FPE breakers present a high risk for an electrical fire. Due to lack of funding the CPSC Thousands of these electrical was unsuccessful in continuing their investigation to obtain panels lead to electrical fires each enough information to recall the FPE panel, which allowed the defective panels to be placed in millions of homes and year. businesses. The solution to preventing an electrical fire is to replace FPE panels. Do you want to gamble with inadequate fire protection? How is an electrical panel supposed to work? • An electrical panel includes bus bars, which conduct a major current of electricity from incoming feeders. • Circuit breakers connect to bus bars and safely distribute electricity throughout the facility. • Each circuit breaker protects the electric current flowing to a specific appliance or outlet. • The circuit breaker will trip (shut off) the flow of electricity if it senses that the current is overloaded or short-circuited. • When a circuit breaker trips, it prevents the wiring from overheating and starting an electrical fire. Why are Federal Pacific Electric panels so dangerous? • FPE panels are known to be overcrowded with wires. • Bus bars for several of the panels are spring mounted which can cause unstable connections.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: California Abuse/Neglect Mandated Reporters
    Appendix A: California abuse/neglect mandated reporters Child Abuse/Neglect (Penal Code § Elder/Dependent Adult Abuse (Welfare & Inst. Injury by Firearm or 11165.7) Code §§ 15630, 15610.37) Assault/Abuse (Penal Code § 11160) 1. Teacher. 1. Any employee (including support staff Health practitioners. Physician, and maintenance staff) working in any surgeon, psychiatrist, psychologist, 2. Instructional aide. facility that provides any elder or dentist, resident, intern, podiatrist, chiropractor, licensed nurse, dental 3. Teacher's aide or teacher's dependent care services. hygienist, optometrist, marriage, assistant. 2. Any employee providing direct health family and child counselor, clinical social worker, or other licensed 4. Administrative officer or care or social services to an elder or health care professional. supervisor of child welfare and dependent adult. attendance, or a certificated i. Certified emergency 3. Health care practitioners. pupil-personnel employee of medical technician I or any school. i. Physician, surgeon, II, paramedic, or other psychiatrist, psychologist, emergency services 5. Head Start program teacher. dentist, resident, intern, personnel. 6. Administrator of a public or podiatrist, chiropractor, ii. Registered private day camp. licensed nurse, dental psychological assistant. 7. Administrator or employee of a hygienist, optometrist, iii. Marriage, family and youth marriage, family and child child therapist trainee or center, recreation program or counselor, clinical social unlicensed intern. organization. worker, or other licensed health care professional. iv. Any person who 8. Administrator or employee of an performs autopsies. organization whose duties ii. Certified emergency require direct contact and medical technician I or II, supervision of children. paramedic, or other emergency services 9. Licensee, administrator or personnel. employee of a licensed community care or child day iii.
    [Show full text]