The 2008 South Dakota Integrated Report for Surface Water Quality Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 2008 South Dakota Integrated Report for Surface Water Quality Assessment THE 2008 SOUTH DAKOTA INTEGRATED REPORT FOR SURFACE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Protecting South Dakota’s Tomorrow…Today Prepared By SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Steven M. Pirner, Secretary SOUTH DAKOTA WATER QUALITY WATER YEARS 2002-2007 (streams) and WATER YEARS 2000-2007 (lakes) The 2008 South Dakota Integrated Report Surface Water Quality Assessment by the State of South Dakota pursuant to Sections 305(b), 303(d), and 314 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources Steven M. Pirner, Secretary Table of Contents FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................... II TABLES ......................................................................................................................................................III I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................ 3 III. SURFACE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT........................................................................ 6 SURFACE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM.................................................................. 6 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................... 24 STATEWIDE SURFACE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY.................................................................. 31 LAKE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT............................................................................................ 38 RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENTS............................................................................ 43 WETLANDS.......................................................................................................................................... 158 PUBLIC HEALTH/AQUATIC LIFE CONCERNS............................................................................... 161 IV. POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAMS................................................................................. 170 POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM..................................................................... 170 NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM ............................................................ 172 V. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS .................................................................................. 179 VI. REFERENCES........................................................................................................................... 180 VII. KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................... 183 APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................... 184 APPENDIX A......................................................................................................................................... 185 WATERBODIES WITH EPA APPROVED TMDLS ........................................................................... 185 APPENDIX B......................................................................................................................................... 188 SD DENR 2008 WATERBODY DELISTING REPORT....................................................................... 188 APPENDIX C......................................................................................................................................... 193 SURFACE WATER QUALITY MONITORING SCHEDULE............................................................. 193 AND SAMPLING SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 193 APPENDIX D......................................................................................................................................... 205 MEDIAN TSI SECCHI-CHLOROPHYLL FOR ASSESSED ............................................................... 205 LAKES BY FISHERY BENEFICIAL USE ........................................................................................... 205 APPENDIX E......................................................................................................................................... 211 SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE PERMITS BY BASIN................................................................... 211 APPENDIX F ......................................................................................................................................... 215 303(D) SUMMARY................................................................................................................................ 215 APPENDIX G......................................................................................................................................... 223 PUBLIC COMMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 223 i Figures Figure 1: Status of TMDLs from the 2006 Integrated Report ...................................................................... 21 Figure 2: Major River Basins in South Dakota............................................................................................. 45 Figure 3: 2008 South Dakota Waterbody Status .......................................................................................... 46 Figure 4: Bad River Basin ............................................................................................................................ 51 Figure 5: Belle Fourche River Basin ............................................................................................................ 63 Figure 6: Upper Big Sioux River Basin........................................................................................................ 82 Figure 7: Lower Big Sioux River Basin ....................................................................................................... 83 Figure 8: Upper Cheyenne River Basin........................................................................................................ 98 Figure 9: Lower Cheyenne River Basin ....................................................................................................... 99 Figure 10: Grand River Basin..................................................................................................................... 104 Figure 11: Upper James River Basin.......................................................................................................... 116 Figure 12: Lower James River Basin ......................................................................................................... 117 Figure 13: Little Missouri River Basin....................................................................................................... 120 Figure 14: Minnesota River Basin.............................................................................................................. 125 Figure 15: Upper Missouri River Basin...................................................................................................... 135 Figure 16: Lower Missouri River Basin ..................................................................................................... 136 Figure 17: Moreau River Basin .................................................................................................................. 140 Figure 18: Niobrara River Basin ................................................................................................................ 143 Figure 19: Red River Basin ........................................................................................................................ 146 Figure 20: Vermillion River Basin ............................................................................................................. 151 Figure 21: White River Basin..................................................................................................................... 157 Figure 22: Map Depicting Prairie Pothole Region ..................................................................................... 158 Figure 23: Status of TMDL Assessment and Implementation Projects...................................................... 178 Figure 24: South Dakota DENR Water Quality Monitoring Sites.............................................................. 200 Figure 25: Water Quality Monitoring Sites on Whitewood Creek and Tributaries in Lead-Deadwood Area..................................................................................................................... 201 Figure 26: Water Quality Monitoring Sites Located on the Big Sioux River in the Sioux Falls Area ....... 202 Figure 27: Water Quality Monitoring Sites Located along the Cheyenne River and White River that are Monitored for Uranium ..................................................................................... 203 Figure 28: Water Quality Monitoring Sites Located near the Grand River and Moreau River that are Monitored for Uranium.......................................................................................................... 204 ii Tables Table 1. Atlas ................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Lac Qui Parle County Water Plan (2014-2023) ~ Table of Contents ~
    Lac qui Parle County Local Water Management Plan Serving the Years 2014-2023 ~ With 2014-2018 Implementation Plan ~ Prepared by The Lac qui Parle County Resource Commission, with assistance from Midwest Community Planning, LLC Lac qui Parle County Resource Commission ~ The Resource Commission works to coordinate and guide water resource management in Lac qui Parle County ~ Graylen Carlson County Commissioner (as appointed by the County Board) Darrell Ellefson Watershed Manager (as appointed by the Watershed District) Bob Ludvigson SWCD Supervisor (as appointed by the SWCD) Dave Craigmile Planning & Zoning (as appointed by the Planning & Zoning Board) Mark Bourne Township Officer (selection at discretion of the County Board) Members-At-Large Jeff Rheingans ~ Crops Jim Nesvold ~ Well Sealer Ron Enger ~ Livestock/Cattle Jerry Stensrud ~ Septics Kay Fernholz ~ Organic Jeff Olson ~ Seed Dealer/Edible Beans John Plathe ~ Crops James Barthel ~ Livestock/Dairy Mark Hastad ~ Crops Myron Anhalt ~ Livestock/Turkeys Local Units of Government Jennifer Breberg ~ Environmental Officer Trudy Hastad ~ LqPYB Watershed District Grant Bullemer ~ LqP SWCD Jon Radermacher ~ City of Madison Sonja Farmer ~ City of Marietta Mary Homan ~ LqPYB Clean Water Partnership Agency Advisors Burton Hendrickson, Natural Resource Conservation Service David Sill, Board of Water and Soil Resources Stacy Salvevold, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Brad Olson, Department of Natural Resources Katherine Pekarek-Scott, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Water Plan Coordinator ~ Terry Wittnebel, LqP SWCD District Manager Lac qui Parle County Water Plan (2014-2023) ~ Table of Contents ~ Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... iv A: Purpose of the Local Water Plan ........................................................................ iv B: A Description of Lac qui Parle County’s Priority Concerns ............................... v C: Summary of Goals, Objectives, Action Steps, and Estimated Cost ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of South Dakota
    MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 119 Fishes of South Dakota REEVE M. BAILEY AND MARVIN 0. ALLUM South Dakota State College ANN ARBOR MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN JUNE 5, 1962 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY 01; MICHIGAN The publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, consist of two series-the Occasional Papers and the Miscellaneous Publications. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W. W. Newcomb. The Occasional Papers, publication of which was begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They are issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and indi- viduals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneous Publications, which include papers on field and museum tech- niques, monographic studies, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, are published separately. It is not intended that they be grouped into volumes. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents. A conlplete list of publications on Birds, Fishes, Insects, Mammals, Mollusks, and Reptiles and Amphibians is available. Address inquiries to the Director, Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan No. 13. Studies of the fishes of the order Cyprinodontes. By CARL L. HUBBS. (1924) 23 pp., 4 pls. ............................................. No. 15. A check-list of the fishes of the Great Lakes and tributary waters, with nomenclatorial notes and analytical keys.
    [Show full text]
  • Il[Irlllii~Lliilllmlilrliilr
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY LI~~~Jm'llllll~~~il[irlllii~lliilllmlilrliilas part of an ongoingr digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 3 0307 00062 5502 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Division of Water Quality Municipal Section WASTEWATER DISPOSAL FACILITIES INVENTORY July 1, 1991 Summary Number Population Total State Population (1990) 4,375,099 Municipalities in the State 855 3,396,371 Municipalities with Sewer Systems 661 3,305,749 Municipalities without Sewer System 194 90,622 Municipalities having a Sewer System 2 413 without Treatment Municipalities which have only Primary 4 541 treatment (4 plants) Municipalities which have a Maximum of 502 2,684,724 Secondary Treatment (403 plants) Municipalities which have Tertiary 153 620,071 Treatment (129 plants) Municipalities having a Sewer System 659 3,305,336 with Treatment Works (536 plants) 1 Table of Contents Tables Pages 1. Municipal and Sanitary District Wastewater Treatment Works 2. Unincorporated Communities Having Sewer Systems and Wastewater Treatment Works 3. Wastewater Disposal Facilities at State Institutions 4. Wastewater Disposal Facilities at Sanatoriums and Nursing Homes 5. Wastewater Disposal Facilities at Federal Installations 6. Miscellaneous Wastewater Treatment Works 7. Facilities Operated by Sanitary Districts 8. Municipal Industrial Waste Treatment Works 9. Wastewater Disposal Facilities Operated by Indian Councils 10. Wastewater Treatment Facilities with Tertiary Treatment 11. Wastewater Treatment Facilities Completed in 1990 and 1991 12. Wastewater Treatment Facilities Under Construction 13. Municipalities Having Sewer Systems Without Treatment Works Listed Alphabetically 14. Municipalities Without Sewer Systems - Listed Alphabetically 15.
    [Show full text]
  • 7050.0470 CLASSIFICATIONS for SURFACE WATERS in MAJOR DRAINAGE BASINS. Subpart 1. Lake Superior Basin. the Water Use Classifica
    1 REVISOR 7050.0470 7050.0470 CLASSIFICATIONS FOR SURFACE WATERS IN MAJOR DRAINAGE BASINS. Subpart 1. Lake Superior basin. The water use classifications for the listed waters in the Lake Superior basin are as identified in items A to D. See parts 7050.0425 and 7050.0430 for the classifications of waters not listed. A. Streams: (1) Ahlenius Creek, (T.53, R.14, S.9, 10): 1B, 2A, 3B; (2) Amenda Creek, (T.59, R.5, S.19, 20, 29, 30, 31; T.59, R.6, S.36): 1B, 2A, 3B; (3) Amity Creek, (T.50, R.13, S.5, 6; T.50, R.14, S.1; T.51, R.13, S.31, 32; T.51, R.14, S.26, 27, 28, 35, 36): 1B, 2A, 3B; (4) Amity Creek, East Branch (T.51, R.13, S.30, 31; T.51, R.14, S.13, 14, 15, 22, 24, 25, 36): 1B, 2A, 3B; (5) Anderson Creek, Carlton County, (T.46, R.17, S.11, 14, 15, 22, 26, 27): 1B, 2A, 3B; (6) Anderson Creek, St. Louis County, (T.49, R.15, S.16, 17, 18; T.49, R.16, S.12, 13): 1B, 2A, 3B; (7) Artichoke Creek, (T.52, R.17, S.7, 17, 18): 1B, 2A, 3B; (8) Assinika Creek, (T.63, R.1E, S.1; T.63, R.2E, S.7, 8, 16, 17, 21; T.64, R.1E, S.36; T.64, R.2E, S.31): 1B, 2A, 3B; (9) Bally Creek, (T.61, R.1W, S.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; T.61, R.2W, S.12): 1B, 2A, 3B; (10) Baptism River, East Branch, (T.57, R.6, S.6; T.57, R.7, S.1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 20; T.58, R.6, S.30, 31; T.58, R.7, S.13, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 36; T.58, R.8, S.22, 23, 24, 25, 26): 1B, 2A, 3B; (11) Baptism River, Main Branch, (T.56, R.7, S.3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 14, 15; T.57, R.7, S.20, 27, 28, 29, 33, 34): 1B, 2A, 3B; (12) Baptism River, West Branch, (T.57, R.7, S.7, 17, 18, 20; T.57, R.8, S.1, 2, 12; T.58, R.8, S.2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36; T.59, R.8, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Lac Qui Parle River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy
    Watershed August 2021 Lac qui Parle River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report Authors Timothy Erickson, P.E., Houston Engineering, Inc. Scott Kronholm, PhD, Houston Engineering, Inc. Lori Han, PhD, Houston Engineering, Inc. Contributors/acknowledgements Katherine Pekarek-Scott, MPCA Scott MacLean, MPCA Marco Graziani, MPCA Anna Bosch, MPCA Kelli Nerem, MPCA Chuck Regan, MPCA Ian Ackman, MPCA Ryan Bjerke, DNR WRAPS Local Work Group Lac qui Parle – Yellow Bank Watershed District Yellow Medicine County SWCD Mitch Enderson Brooke Buysse Mark Hiles Trudy Hastad Kurt Johnson Jason Beckler Jared Roiland Anita Borg Darrel Ellefson Brayden Anderson Minnesota Department of Dave Craigmile Tyler Knutson Natural Resources David Ludvigson Jon Lore John Cornell Yellow Medicine County Ryan Bjerke Michael Frank Christopher Balfany Brady Swanson Jolene Johnson Brooke Hacker Lac qui Parle County Taralee Latozke Deron Brehmer Lincoln County SWCD Jenny Breberg Dale Sterzinger National Resources John Maatz Colleen Wichern Conservation Service Jacob Harrison Burton Hendrickson Lac qui Parle County SWCD Rhyan Schicker Board of Water and Soil U.S. Fish and Wildlife Quintin Peterson Resources Stephanie Bishir Chessa Frahm Douglas Goodrich Cover photo credit: Lac qui Parle River MPCA webpage https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/watersheds/lac-qui-parle-river The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to a wider audience. Visit our website for more information. The MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Those with disabilities limiting their ability to access report information may contact the MPCA Watershed Project Manager to provide alternate formats that suit their needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sioux River Watershed Strategic Plan
    BIG SIOUX RIVER WATERSHED STRATEGIC PLAN In Cooperation With: South Dakota Conservation Districts South Dakota Association of Conservation Districts South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Date: June 2016 Prepared by: TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 9 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 12 1.1 Project Background and Scope .................................................................... 12 1.2 Climate ....................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Population................................................................................................... 13 1.4 Geography .................................................................................................. 16 1.5 Soils ........................................................................................................... 18 1.6 Land Use .................................................................................................... 22 1.7 Water Resources ......................................................................................... 22 1.8 Big Sioux River Watershed Improvement History ....................................... 23 1.8.1 Upper Big Sioux River Watershed ........................................................ 26 1.8.2 North-Central
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Water Fund Expenditure Report
    z c Clean Water Fund Expenditure Report January 2012 Legislative Charge Minn. Statutes § 114d.50, subd. 4c A state agency or other recipient of a direct appropriation from the Clean Water Fund must compile and submit all information for proposed and funded projects or programs, including the proposed measurable outcomes and all other items required under Section 3.303, subdivision 10, to the Legislative Coordinating Commission as soon as practicable or by January 15 of the applicable fiscal year, whichever comes first. Authors Estimated cost of preparing this report (as Myrna Halbach required by Minn. Stat. § 3.197) Alexis Donath Total staff time: 55 hrs. $1,388 Kurt Soular Production/duplication $63 Total $1,451 Contributors / Acknowledgements Linda Carroll The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs Jennifer Crea by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to wider audience. Visit our web site Editing and Graphic Design for more information. Paul Andre MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer Scott Andre recycled content paper manufactured without Jerome Davis chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Beth Tegdesch Cover photo: Scott Andre Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: lrp-f-1sy12 Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Minnesota River Watershed Five Year Strategic Plan
    UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED FIVE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN In Cooperation With: East Dakota Water Development District South Dakota Conservation Districts South Dakota Association of Conservation Districts South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Date: August 2012 Prepared by: TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................6 Introduction ........................................................................................................................8 1.1 Project Background and Scope ........................................................................8 1.2 Upper Minnesota River Watershed History ...................................................10 1.3 Upper Minnesota River Watershed Water Quality Studies ..........................13 1.4 Goals of the Upper Minnesota River Basin Project .......................................15 2.0 Causes and Sources of Impairment .......................................................................15 2.0.1 Geography, Soils, and Land Use....................................................................15 2.0.2 Water Bodies Studies and Current Status .....................................................24 2.1.0 Description of the Impairments for 303(d) Water Body Listings in the Upper Minnesota River Basin ............................................................29 2.1.1 Temperature ...................................................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Bridges in South Dakota, 1893-1943
    NEB Ram 10-900-b * QB ND. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES QC I & 0 133 MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM N&T1GH&L j This farm is fear use in documenting rtultiple property groups relating to cne or several historic ccnbexts. Se4 instrtcticns in Guidelines for OQndetinq Naticnal Register Etarrns (National Ragister Bulletin 161. CtrrpiLete each iten by marking "x" in the appccptriate box or hy entering the regjested infcaitHbkn. Rar additional space use cxxtiinuaticn sheets (Ram lO-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing___________________________________ Historic Bridges in South Dakota, 1893-1943 B. Associated Historic Contexts____________________________________ Historic Bridges in South Dakota, 1893-1943 C. Geographical Data The State of South Dakota DQg See continuation sheet_____________________________________________________________ D. Certification________________________________________________ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. Signature o£ certifying official Date State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating E. Statement of Historic Contexts HISTORIC BRIDGES IN SOUTH DAKOTA, 1893-1942 THE FIRST SOUTH DAKOTA BRIDGES AND THEIR BUILDERS Prior to the early 19th century and the establishment of the European- American fur trade in South Dakota, the region's transportation network consisted of the trails and water routes of the Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Permit Provisions and Agreement
    AEDISTRIBUTION FOR PART 50 D0CET 1'A7ERTAL (T/~PO~ARy F0R4 CONTROL :O: 1722 - _____ ____ ____ ____ ENVIRO DAT Minnesota Pollution Control Agenc3 OF DOC: DATE REC'D LT MEMo Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 3-6-73 3-14-73 Grant J.-Merritt I - .ORIG 3 OIER SENT AECi x L. Manning Muntzing SENT LOCAL __X =1; t ss:r? - 23 50-263 DESCRIPTION: ENCLOSURES: Ltr re Water Certification...with attached Regulations; permit provisions and Agreement. ACKNO G P.ANT NAbZS: Monticello DO NOT REMOVE FOR ACTION OR>ATION -n- 0 BT1LER(L) SCHWENCER(L) **ZIEMANN(L) / Co e C -IOUNGBLOOD(E) ,cWLCopies W/ CLARK(L) r/ Copies 4 Copies STOLZ(L) ROUSE(FM) REGAN(E) W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies* W/ Copies GOLLER(L) VASSALLO(L) *DICKER(E) V / -Copies W/ Copies / KNIEL(L) Copies W/ Copies SCE-1EL(L) KNIGETON(E) -W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ copies W/ Copies wi Copies e~tumJ D ISTRIBUTION TECH REVIEW DENTON F & M WADE E HEND RIE GRIMES SMILEY BROWN E 0OGC, R0014 P-506A SCER )OEER GAMMILL NUSSBAUMER ...G. WILLAMS E .. *MUZINGSTAFF MACCARY KASTNER E CASE 'SHEPPARD KNIGHT(2) BALLARD. LIC ASST. GIAYBUSSO PAWLICKI SPANGLER SERVICE L IND BOYD A/T SHAO WIISON L BRAITnnk V. MOORE-L(FBR) STELLO ENVIRO GOULBOURNE L SALTZMAN DEYOUNG-L(P-w-R) HOUSTON MULLER SMITH L Ld6KOVHOLT-L NOVACK DICKER GEARIN L PIANS P. COLLINS ROSS KNIGHTON .ovDIGGS L MCDONALD IPPOLITO YOUNGBLOOD TEETS L DUBE REG OPR TEDESCO REGAN LEE L ./IE& REGION(2) LONG PROJ LEADER MAIGRET L INFO MORRIS IAINAS SHAFER F & M C.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT Determination of river otter (Lontra canadensis) distribution and evaluation of potential sites for population expansion in South Dakota 1 October 2011 - 30 January 2015 Prepared for: Wildlife Diversity Program South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Submitted by Wayne E. Melquist, Ph.D. CREX Consulting [email protected] May 2015 Grant Number T-55-R-1, Study No. 2465 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Completion of this project would have been immensely more challenging were it not for the support, cooperation, and encouragement of numerous South Dakota Game, Fish, and Parks (SDGFP) personnel. Silka Kempema, biologist with the Wildlife Diversity Program, was my primary contact in administering this contract, including multiple amendments. She never hesitated to assist in any way possible and enthusiastically joined me on floats down the Belle Fourche and Cheyenne Rivers. Silka has been a good companion and friend. Behind the scene, Eileen Dowd Stukel, head of the Wildlife Diversity Program, facilitated many aspects of the project and provided valuable input and review of the final report. Heather Berg, GIS Analyst, exhibited great patience with me during production of the maps found in the report, even when we went through multiple iterations before arriving at a final product. And Chelsea West, Heather’s supervisor, has provided me with graphic assistance for a decade of South Dakota projects. Jacquie Ermer, Regional Wildlife Manager, Watertown, conducted some of the early assessments of otters in South Dakota, and was a kindred spirit when it came to furbearers. The door was always open at the “Ermer Hotel” whenever I was in the Webster area, and I enjoyed sharing time with her family.
    [Show full text]
  • Wq-Rule4-12E 09/26/16 REVISOR CKM/DI RD4237
    09/26/16 REVISOR CKM/DI RD4237 1.1 Pollution Control Agency 1.2 Proposed Permanent Rule Relating to Water Quality Standards and Tiered Aquatic 1.3 Life Use 1.4 7050.0140 USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR WATERS OF THE STATE. 1.5 [For text of subps 1 and 2, see M.R.] 1.6 Subp. 3. Class 2 waters, aquatic life and recreation. Aquatic life and recreation 1.7 includes all waters of the state that support or may support fish, other aquatic life aquatic 1.8 biota, bathing, boating, or other recreational purposes and for which quality control is or 1.9 may be necessary to protect aquatic or terrestrial life or their habitats or the public health, 1.10 safety, or welfare. 1.11 [For text of subps 4 to 8, see M.R.] 1.12 7050.0150 DETERMINATION OF WATER QUALITY, BIOLOGICAL AND 1.13 PHYSICAL CONDITIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS. 1.14 [For text of subps 1 and 2, see M.R.] 1.15 Subp. 3. Narrative standards. For all Class 2 waters, the aquatic habitat, which 1.16 includes the waters of the state and stream bed, shall not be degraded in any material 1.17 manner, there shall be no material increase in undesirable slime growths or aquatic plants, 1.18 including algae, nor shall there be any significant increase in harmful pesticide or other 1.19 residues in the waters, sediments, and aquatic flora and fauna; the normal fishery and lower 1.20 aquatic biota upon which it is dependent and the use thereof shall not be seriously impaired 1.21 or endangered, the species composition shall not be altered materially, and the propagation 1.22 or migration of the fish and other aquatic biota normally present shall not be prevented or 1.23 hindered by the discharge of any sewage, industrial waste, or other wastes to the waters.
    [Show full text]