DOCSLIB.ORG

National Security Agency FY 2013 Military Construction, Defense-Wide ($ in Thousands)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Security Agency FY 2013 Military Construction, Defense-Wide ($ in Thousands) UNCLASSIFIED National Security Agency FY 2013 Military Construction, Defense-Wide ($ in Thousands) New/ Authorization Approp. Current Page State/Installation/Project Request Request Mission No. Colorado Buckley Air Force Base Denver Power House 30,000 30,000 C 125 Maryland Fort Meade High Performance Computing Center Inc 2 - 300,521 C 128 NSAW Recapitalize Building #1/ Site M Inc 1 128,600 25,000 C 131 Utah Camp Williams IC CNCI Data Center 1 Inc 4 - 191,414 C 134 United Kingdom RAF Menwith Hill Station MHS Utilities and Roads 3,795 3,795 C 138 Total 162,395 550,730 123 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 2. DATE 1. COMPONENT FY 2013 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM February 2012 NSA/CSS DEFENSE 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONS 4. COMMAND 5. AREA CONSTRUCTION ADF-C Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado NSA/CSS COST INDEX .96 6. PERSONNEL STRENGTH PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED TOTAL Tenant of US ARMY OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV A. AS OF B. END FY CLASS IFIED 7. INVENTORY DATA ($000) A. TOTAL ACREAGE B. INVENTORY TOTAL AS OF Aug 1999 0 C. AUTHORIZED NOT YET IN INVENTORY 0 D. APPROPRIATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM 30,000 E. AUTHORIZATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM 0 F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE YEARS 0 G. REMAINING DEFICIENCY 0 H. GRAND TOTAL 30,000 8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: CATEGORY PROJECT COST DESIGN STATUS PROJECT TITLE CODE NUMBER ($000) START COMPLETE 813 25643 Denver POWERHOUSE (FY13) 30,000 Oct 2011 0% 9. FUTURE PROJECTS: a. INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM CATEGORY COST PROJECT TITLE CODE ($000) b. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE YEARS CATEGORY COST PROJECT TITLE CODE ($000) 10. MISSION OR MAJOR FUNCTION Agency activities are classified. 11. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES: A. AIR POLLUTION 0 B. WATER POLLUTION 0 C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 0 DD Form 1390, DEC 76 124 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1. Component 2. Date FY 2013 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA NSA/CSS DEFENSE February 2012 3. Installation and Location 4. Project Title ADF-C Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado DENVER POWER HOUSE 5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project 8. Project Cost ($000) 813 Number $30,000 25643 9. COST ESTIMATES Item U/M Quantity Unit Cost Cost ($000) PRIMARY FACILITY 25,671 Generator Building LS (25,206) Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS (400) Building Information Systems LS (65) SUPPORTING FACILITIES 1,512 Electric Service and Distribution LS (1049) Water, Sewer, Gas Distribution LS (112) Site work LS (105) Earthwork LS (136) Information Systems LS (110) TOTAL CONTRUCTION COST 27,183 Contingency (~5%) 1,359 SUBTOTAL 28,542 SIOH (5.70%) 1,447 Total Project Request 29,989 TOTAL PROJECT COST (ROUNDED) 30,000 Equipment / Furniture / IT & Security Fit-up Provided From Other Appropriations (2,000) 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: This project provides for the distribution of power brought to the site by the newly constructed power plant. This project is within a fenced, limited access complex, in order to alleviate current Aerospace Data Facility (ADF-C) power deficiencies and allow for mission growth. The POWER HOUSE facility will be approximately 20,000 SF and will include the addition of up to five 2.5 MW generators and associated equipment. Supporting facilities include Heating and Air conditioning systems with redundant utilities, electrical service, exterior and security lighting, fire protection and alarm systems, information systems, and site improvements. Access for the handicapped will be provided. Comprehensive building and furnishings related interior design services will also be provided. Earthwork will include rough grading, bulk excavation, service entrance infrastructure, storm drainage structures, and duct banks for utility power services. Site work will include final grading, curb and gutter installation, road paving, walkways, groundcover and landscaping. 11. REQUIREMENT: 20,000 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTANDARD: None PROJECT: Construct an expansion of the Aerospace Data Facility (ADF-C) power plant infrastructure to accommodate mission growth and address increased loads, deficiencies and to allow the redistribution of loads from the existing ADF-C power plant to the new power plant. REQUIREMENT: The project is required to leverage the residual power remaining from the power feeder brought to site in support of the MV, in order to alleviate the current power deficiencies at the ADF-C. Distribution of power from the newly installed power plant will include the addition of up to 5 diesel Generators and associated equipment. Identify loads to be moved from existing ADF-C power plant and re- feed them from the new power plant. Facility will be designed and certifiable to the highest LEED rating attainable within available resources with a target of LEED-NC Silver and will include: sustainable site characteristics, water and energy efficiency, materials and resources criteria, and indoor environmental quality. Stormwater management to mitigate environmental impact per EISA requirements is included. This project is to be compliant with the current version of the Maryland Procurement Office (MPO), Facilities Engineering Design Standards (FEDS) as well as site facilities criteria DD Form 1391, DEC 76 125 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1. Component 2. Date FY 2013 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA NSA/CSS DEFENSE February 2012 3. Installation and Location 4. Project Title ADF-C Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado DENVER POWER HOUSE 5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project 8. Project Cost ($000) 813 Number Authorized FY13 $30,000 25643 Appropriated FY13 $30,000 CURRENT SITUATION: The ADF-C currently projects being out of power capacity in the FY15 timeframe. Completion of the NSA/CSS Colorado Power house will alleviate this issue. IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: There is no current plan in place to alleviate this issue. Without this project, the site will be out of power in 3 years. As the maximum power available is approached, the higher the chance of equipment failure, compounding an already serious situation. ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with multi-agency input covering a number of disciplines to include physical security, and complies with all required physical security and/or combating terrorism measures. Building and Utility requirements have been explored throughout the development of this project, and the design as it stands has been chosen as the most feasible option to meet said requirements. Construction on the Buckley Air Force Base (BAFB) is more complex than at similar military installations for several reasons. First, the nature of work being done at the ADF-C and subsequently BAFB mandates very closely scheduled events, with outages and other sensitive work typically occurring on weekends and at night. Second, limited access to controlled facilities during the programming and design phases can lead to unforeseen conditions during construction. Finally, access to the installation, clearances for personnel, waiting for escorts, and other daily processes at NSA create additional costs for contractors. Escorts are required for positive control of access to primary and secondary utilities which service critical NSA operational facilities. 12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: 1. Status (a) Design Start: Oct 2011 (b) Design 35% Complete: Jan 2012 (c) Construction Start: Jan 2013 (d) Construction Complete: Jan 2014 (e) Type of Contract: Design/Bid/Build 2. Total Cost Construction: $30,000 DD Form 1391, DEC 76 126 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1. COMPONENT 2. DATE NSA/CSS DEFENSE FY 2013 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM February 2012 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. COMMAND 5. AREA CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX FT. George G. Meade, Maryland NSA/CSS 1.00 6. PERSONNEL STRENGTH PERMANENT STUDENTS SUPPORTED TOTAL IC Community Installation OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV OFF ENL CIV a. AS OF x b. END FY CLASS IFIED 7. INVENTORY DATA ($000) A. TOTAL ACREAGE 200 B. INVENTORY TOTAL AS OF DEC 2010 0 C. AUTHORIZED NOT YET IN INVENTORY 0 D. APPROPRIATION REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM 325,521 E. APPROPRIATION INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM 489,000 F. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE YEARS 203, 010 G. PLANNING AND DESIGN COST 0 H. REMAINING DEFICIENCY 0 I. GRAND TOTAL 1,017,731 8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: CATEGORY PROJECT COST DESIGN STATUS PROJECT TITLE CODE NUMBER ($000) START COMPLETE 141 24649 HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING CENTER (FY13) $300,521 Dec 2010 Feb 2012 141 23773 NSAW Recapitalization/Site M (FY13) $25,000 May 2011 Oct 2013 9. FUTURE PROJECTS: a. INCLUDED IN FOLLOWING PROGRAM CATEGORY COST PROJECT TITLE CODE ($000) 141 24649 HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING CENTER (FY14) $431,000 141 23773 NSAW Recapitalization/Site M (FY14) $58,000 b. PLANNED IN NEXT THREE YEARS CATEGORY PROJECT COST PROJECT TITLE CODE NUMBER ($000) NSAW Recapitalization Site M (FY15) 141 23773 45,600 141 17836 South Campus Building Re-Feed(FY15) 69,000 141 17869 North Campus Building Feeders (FY16) 16,000 141 28492 Cooper Avenue Facility/SWM (FY16) 5,000 141 21099 Central Boiler Plant Replacement (FY16) 26,500 141 Classified Materials Conversion (FY17) 40,910 10. MISSION OR MAJOR FUNCTION Agency activities are classified. 11. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES: A. AIR POLLUTION TBD B. WATER POLLUTION TBD C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH TBD DD Form 1390, DEC 76 127 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 1. COMPONENT 2. Date FY 2013 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA NSA/CSS DEFENSE February 2012 3. Installation and Location 4. Project Title FT. George G. Meade, Maryland HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING CENTER (HPCC), INCREMENT 2 5. Program Element 6. Category Code 7. Project 8. Project
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Camp Williams – Master Plan
    Request for Proposals Camp Williams – Master Plan Utah Army National Guard, Construction, Facilities, and Maintenance Office (CFMO) 12953 South Minuteman Drive, Draper, UT 84020 December 18, 2020 Contact: 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Numbers Title Sheet 1 Table of Contents 2 Notice to Consultants 3 Study Description 4 Procurement Process 5-11 1 NOTICE TO CONSULTANTS The Utah Army National Guard, Construction, Facilities, and Maintenance Office (CFMO) is soliciting the services of qualified teams/individuals to perform consulting services for the following study: Camp Williams – Master Plan The Utah Army National Guard CFMO is serving as the sponsor for the Camp Williams – Master Plan which is a long-range planning document for Camp Williams, Utah. It will also include participation from the leadership, Department of Public Works (DPW) and other tenants of Camp Williams, along with the office of Environmental Resource Management (ERM). A Camp Williams master plan was completed in 2013 which did a good job of identifying many compatibility and growth issues. Since that time, tremendous growth has occurred in the area surrounding Camp Williams and growth on the base has deviated from previous plans. A new Master Plan will be able to evaluate the effectiveness of the previous plan and present ideas to improve the planning process going into the future. Since Camp Williams is an important training facility, it is imperative that good planning does what it can to influence communities to focus on the best methods to protect military training and installation resilience while sustaining compatible economic development. Provide the Best Value for the Budget The budget for this study is $230,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Data Center, As Well As Any Search Results Pages
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 84688A 2 May 2017 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald : This responds to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of 14 June 2016 for Intellipedia pages on Boundless Information and/or BOUNDLESS INFORMANT and/or Bull Run and/or BULLRUN and/or Room 641A and/ or Stellar Wind and/ or Tailored Access Operations and/ or Utah Data Center, as well as any search results pages. A copy of your request is enclosed. As stated in our previous response, dated 15 June 2016, your request was assigned Case Number 84688. For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided in your letter, you are considered an "all other" requester. As such, you are allowed 2 hours of search and the duplication of 100 pages at no cost. There are no assessable fees for this request. Your request has been processed under the FOIA. For your information, NSA provides a service of common concern for the Intelligence Community (IC) by serving as the executive agent for Intelink. As such, NSA provides technical services that enable users to access and share information with peers and stakeholders across the IC and DoD.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's Defense Sector: Economic Impacts of the Military and Veterans
    Utah’s Defense Sector: Economic Impacts of the Military and Veterans Authored by: John Downen and Levi Pace March 2017 (Updated September 2020) Utah’s Defense Sector: Economic Impacts of the Military and Veterans Table of Contents: Executive Summary .........................................2 Section 8. Defense Grants and Contracts ....................27 Economic Impacts ........................................2 8.1 DOD and VA Contracts and Grants in Utah, Fiscal Impacts .............................................4 FY 2000 to 2015 ....................................27 Federal Defense Employment .............................4 8.2 FY 2015 Contracts and Grants ......................28 Section 1. Study Methods ...................................5 8.3 Impacts of Defense Grants .........................30 1.1 Terms Used in This Report ...........................5 8.4 Impacts of Other Defense Contracts ................32 1.2 Data Collection .....................................6 Section 9. Trends in Defense Employment 1.3 Estimating Economic Impacts .......................7 and Compensation ................................33 1.4 Estimating Fiscal Impacts ...........................8 9.1 Defense Employment in Utah, 1990 to 2015 ........33 1.5 Acknowledgments ..................................8 9.2 Compensation from Defense Employment, Section 2. Hill Air Force Base Current Operations ............10 1990 to 2015. .34 Section 3. Dugway Proving Ground .........................13 Section 10. Hill Air Force Base Closure Scenario .............36
    [Show full text]
  • WRP Utah Military Asset List (MAL)
    WRP Utah Military Asset List (MAL) Within the Western Regional Partnership (WRP) region, there are significant military testing and training installations and ranges. WRP developed summaries from all of the Services and the National Guard, describing the history, missions, and importance of these assets. These summaries use only publicly available information and are written for the policy maker new to military issues and the military savvy person needing specific military information. It is our hope that WRP Partners use these summaries as a tool for land use planning efforts to encourage compatible growth and ensure future mission viability. Incompatible development (encroachment) comes in many forms but for the military, it means those issues that affect their ability to fulfill their mission on land, in the sea, or in the air. These military summaries are for general planning purposes. Attached Utah MAL summaries: Air Force: • Hill Air Force Base • Utah Test and Training Range Army: • Dugway Proving Ground • Tooele Army Depot National Guard: • Utah Air National Guard • Utah Army National Guard Military Asset List 2016 U.S. Air Force: HILL AFB : UTAH Hill Air Force Base is an Air Force Materiel Command base located in northern Utah. Hill is the Air Force's third largest base by population and size. The base is home to many operational and support missions, with the host organization Above: Hill AFB is the largest single-site employer in Utah. (Associated Press being the 75th Photo) Air Base Wing. Left: Two F-16s taxi on runway at Hill AFB. (U.S. Air Force photo) Hill AFB traces its history to when the Army attempted to establish an airmail station in the area MISSION STATEMENT Provide mission-ready Airmen and in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Williams, Utah West Traverse Sentinel Landscape Source: Envision Utah, Point of the Mountain Commission a Brief History of Camp Williams
    Camp Williams, Utah West Traverse Sentinel Landscape Source: Envision Utah, Point of the Mountain Commission A Brief History of Camp Williams . 1894 - Utah Territorial Legislature authorized the establishment of the Utah National Guard. 1914 - President Woodrow Wilson set aside 18,700 acres to provide permanent training grounds. 1926-1928 – The cantonment area is rented by the State of Utah as the training area lacked level ground for constructing support structures. The State of Utah later purchases this property and is currently the garrison area at Camp Williams. (659 acres) . 1928 – Camp Williams is officially established for permanent use and is named Camp W.G. Williams after Brigadier General William Grey Williams for his work in establishing the training site and for his service during the Spanish-American War. 2013 - Utah Data Center is opened. Operated by the NSA as part of the National Cybersecurity Initiative. Current – 24,063 acres of premier training ground. What We Are Protecting . 24,063 Acres of training area. 19,927 Federal Acres . 3,146 State Armory Board Acres . 991 SITLA Acres . Realistic terrain and conditions for wartime mission preparation. $1.1B in state of the art ranges, support facilities, and land. (Replacement costs as of 4 Oct 18, Pride Database) . $1.5B Utah Data Center . Accessible Training. Training Time/Less Travel Time = Well Trained Force Recent Use of Camp Williams Army and Air National Guard – Department of the Navy – United States Marine Corps – United States Army – Alpine Police Department – Utah Department of Public Safety – Army Corps of Engineers – Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms – Bureau of Land Management – Brigham Young ROTC - Brigham Young-Idaho ROTC – United States Forest Service – Freedom Academy – Heber City Police – Hill Air Force Base – Herriman Police – Highland High JROTC – Iron County SWAT – Layton Police – Lehi HS Football – Logan Police – Lehi Police – SLC Police – SL County Fire – Sandy Police – Saratoga Springs Police – SEABEES – SOCOM – Utah Parks and Rec – So.
    [Show full text]
  • Saratoga Springs, UT
    RETAIL PROFILE SARATOGA SPRINGS / UTAH 2018 PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS SARATOGA SPRINGS Retail Profile / 2018 Saratoga Springs is a growing, vibrant community that retailers will want to announce as their new home in the coming years. Located at the crossroads of northwest Utah County on the shores of Utah Lake, Saratoga Springs boasts beautiful lakeshore living, great air quality, superb views, and a central location. Saratoga Springs has seen a 57 percent Mayor growth in population since 2010 as one of the fastest growing cities in Utah. Jim Miller 30,000 people call Saratoga Springs home and as a region, the northern Utah County is home to more than 200,000 residents. Based on this continued growth, Saratoga Springs’ population will increase another 33% in the next 5 years and 66% over the next 10 years. 1 Community Stats Utah Saratoga 10 Min Drive Time 30 Min Drive Time Overview Total Population 2,948,427 30,670 58,763 660,320 The City of Saratoga Springs Annual Growth Rate 1.55% 6.91% %4.01 2.22% is experiencing high levels of population and income growth. Total Households 1,024,047 5,721 14,766 190,134 We have a young, active population Median Household Income $62,518 $80,857 $69,343 $69,479 looking for family-oriented activities and experiences. Median Household Age 30.3 years 20.4 years 21.9 years 26.9 years Employee Population 1,447,260 5,836 7,225 225,869 2 Population Consumer Characteristics > 84 75 - 84 65 - 74 Education City State Housing 55 - 64 45 - 54 No High School Diploma 2.8% 8.3% 35 - 44 25 - 34 High
    [Show full text]
  • Washington National Guard Pamphlet
    WASH ARNG PAM 870-1-5 WASH ANG PAM 210-1-5 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD PAMPHLET THE OFFICIAL HISTORY OF THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD VOLUME 5 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN WORLD WAR I HEADQUARTERS MILITARY DEPARTMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL CAMP MURRAY, TACOMA 33, WASHINGTON THIS VOLUME IS A TRUE COPY THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ROSTERS HEREIN HAVE BEEN REVISED BUT ONLY TO PUT EACH UNIT, IF POSSIBLE, WHOLLY ON A SINGLE PAGE AND TO ALPHABETIZE THE PERSONNEL THEREIN DIGITIZED VERSION CREATED BY WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 5 WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN WORLD WAR I. CHAPTER PAGE I WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN THE POST ..................................... 1 PHILIPPINE INSURRECTION PERIOD II WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD MANEUVERS ................................. 21 WITH REGULAR ARMY 1904-12 III BEGINNING OF THE COAST ARTILLERY IN ........................................... 34 THE WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IV THE NAVAL MILITIA OF THE WASHINGTON .......................................... 61 NATIONAL GUARD V WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN THE ............................................. 79 MEXICAN BORDER INCIDENT VI WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN THE ........................................... 104 PRE - WORLD WAR I PERIOD VII WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN WORLD WAR I .......................114 - i - - ii - CHAPTER I WASHINGTON NATIONAL GUARD IN THE POST PHILIPPINE INSURRECTION PERIOD It may be recalled from the previous chapter that with the discharge of members of the Washington National Guard to join the First Regiment of United States Volunteers and the federalizing of the Independent Washington Battalion, the State was left with no organized forces. Accordingly, Governor Rogers, on 22 July 1898, directed Adjutant General William J. Canton to re-establish a State force in Conformity with the Military Code of Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Envision Utah Envision Utah Utilities
    Envision Utah Envision Utah Utilities This appendix includes the consultant reports for the Point of the Mountain study area on storm water, gas, power, water, telecommunications, and transportation. These reports were prepared by Sherwood Design Engineers, Horrocks Engineers, and Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants and are meant to provide an overview of existing conditions in the Point of the Mountain region in regards to these key utilities. This order of the contents of this appendix are as follows: • Sherwood Design Engineers’ Storm Water Report • Horrocks Engineers’ Water, Sewer, Power, and Telecommunications Reports • Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants’ Transportation Report 2 INTRODUCTION This narrative intends to assess issues with current storm water management practices in the Point of the Mountain area and highlight opportunities for the implementation of best management practices. BACKGROUND Project Area The Point of the Mountain region encompasses 150 square miles of communities just south of Salt Lake City, Utah. The valley region is bounded by the Wasatch Mountains to the east, the Oquirrh Mountains to the west, Salt Lake City and Great Salt Lake to the north and Utah Lake to the south. The region takes its name from the Point of the Mountain, a geographic pinch point between the Wasatch Mountain ridge known as Traverse Mountain and the Oquirrh Mountains. The Point of the Mountain is coincident with a section of the Jordan River known as the Jordan Narrows. The Point of the Mountain divides the project into two counties: Salt Lake County to the north and Utah County to the south. The Point of the Mountain is the only point of connection between The Salt Lake metro region to the north and the Provo/Orem metro region to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, February 13, 2019
    BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, February 13, 2019 Notice is hereby given that the Bluffdale City Council will hold a meeting Wednesday, February 13, 2019, at the Bluffdale City Hall, 2222 West 14400 South, Bluffdale, Utah, scheduled to begin promptly at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Notice is further given that access to this meeting by the Mayor and or City Council may be by electronic means via telephonic conference call. WORK SESSION 6:00 P.M. – (The work session is for identifying future items and other council discussion. In accordance with Utah Code § 52-4-201(2)(a), while the meeting may be open to the public, there will not be any opportunity for public input during the work session). 1. Roll Call 2. Presentations – a. Presentation and discussion relating to the Utah Avalanche Soccer Club and possible SD Zone at 3157 West 13800 South, presenter, Scott Butler. b. Presentation and discussion relating to proposal for streetlights along 14400 South and Loumis Parkway, staff presenter, Shane Paddock. c. Discussion relating to policy questions from the Subdivision ordinance, staff presenter, Grant Crowell. 3. Council Discussion REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING 7:00 P.M. 1. Roll Call, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance* 2. PUBLIC FORUM – (4-minute maximum per person to bring items not already on the agenda before the Council. Participants are encouraged to submit a written statement (1 copy) for items that are complex or that may require more than 4 minutes to present). 3. CONSENT AGENDA – 3.1 Approval of the January 09, 2019 Special City Council Meeting (Economic Development) Minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp Williams UT – RAWS Fire Weather Station
    Project: RAWS-Fire Weather Forecasting Client: Camp Williams Army National Guard Location: Draper, Utah Year: 1998 RAWS Fire Weather Forecasting: Camp Williams is a National Guard Training Site operated by the Utah Army National Guard. It is located 26 miles south of Salt Lake City. It consists of 28,000 acres of training areas and has a billeting capacity of 2,800 troops. The main training site for the UTNG includes artillery, engineers, academies & other units. Adjacent to large metropolitan areas -- Salt Lake City & Provo -- the area consists of semi-desert and sage steppe. The area is used for training in combat and other similar uses. IEI was contracted to install a remote weather station for the purpose of fire danger forecasting. If the fire danger rating is too high the base shuts down operations in the range to avoid starting any fires. This makes the accuracy and availability of this weather data very valuable to the operations of the base. The Station has the following equipment: 20 ft Tower Deep Cycle Battery 20 Watt Solar Panel 05103 Wind Monitor Fire weather station CR10 Data logger (Campbell Scientific) RM Young 05103 Wind Monitor Vaisala HMP45C Temperature & RH Sensor Texas Electronics 8" Precipitation Gauge RF400 Spread Spectrum Radio HMP45C Temp & RH TE525WS Rain Gauge RF400 Radio The station is on a PakBus network, which allows the use of a repeater that is located on a small rise between the camp head quarters and the weather station. There are two base stations located within Camp Williams. One is in the Utah State University Environmental group’s office and the other is located in the Range Control office of the base.
    [Show full text]
  • Up 264, Initial (Application, Complaint, Petition), 8/17/2010
    825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000 PACIFIC POWER Portland, Oregon 97232 A DIVISION OF PACIFICORP August 17,2010 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY Oregon Public Utility Commission 550 Capitol Street NE, Suite 215 Salem, OR 97301-2551 Attn: Filing Center RE: UP _ - Application Requesting Approval of Sale of the Terminal-Camp Williams Property Enclosed for filing by PacifiCorp dba, Pacific Power is an Application Requesting Approval ofthe Sale of the Terminal-Camp Williams Property. An original and one (1) copy will be provided via overnight delivery. PacifiCorp respectfully requests that all data requests regarding this matter be addressed to: By E-mail (preferred): By regular mail: Data Request Response Center PacifiCorp 825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97232 Please direct informal questions with respect to this filing to J oelle Steward, Regulatory Manager, at (503) 813-5542. Very truly yours, ~ - I 1 ~ ;\ f\ \jUffi l Andrea L. Kelly Vice President, Regulation Enclosure BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UP In the Matter of the Application of PACIFICORP Requesting Approval of the APPLICA nON OF P ACIFICORP AND Sale of the Terminal-Camp Williams WAIVER OF PAPER SERVICE Property 1 Pursuant to ORS 757.480(1)(a) and OAR 860-027-0025, PacifiCorp, d.b.a. Pacific 2 Power ("Company"), seeks approval from the Public Utility Commission of Oregon 3 ("Commission") for the sale of property located in Herriman, Utah, referred to by the 4 Company and in this Application as "Terminal-Camp Williams." Additionally, pursuant to 5 OAR 860-013-0070(4), the Company respectfully waives paper service in this docket.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Army National Guard : Utah
    Military Asset List 2016 Utah National Guard UTAH ARMY NATIONAL GUARD : UTAH The Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG) is an element of the Utah National Guard and a component of the U.S. Army. The UTARNG, headquartered in Draper, Utah, supports a broad variety of units and capabilities throughout Utah. Army Garrison Camp Williams is a professional training enviroment located just 26 miles south of Salt Lake City. It is a National Guard Training Site operated by the UTARNG and home to the Utah Training Site. Above: AH-64 Apaches from the 1st Utah Training Center—Camp Attack Reconnaissance Battalion, 211th Williams, with 28,000 acres of Aviation out of West Jordan conducts combat-training areas, is the largest live-fire exercises at the Utah Test & Training Range. (U.S. Army photo) training center in Utah and a major training facility for U.S. and Allied Left: Twenty-three Soldiers from across the Utah Army National Guard compete commands. Training facilities in Warrior Task lanes during the state’s include: Small Arms Ranges: 25- annual Best Warrior Competition on Meter, Known Distance, Modified Camp Williams, Utah. (U.S. Army photo) Record Fire, and Pistol; Large-Caliber Direct-Fire Ranges: Grenade VISION STATEMENT Launcher Range and Aerial Gunnery The Guard is America’s Army. We are community based but with capabilities Range; Artillery and Mortar Firing that stretch worldwide. The 379-year Ranges; Battalion Artillery Firing tradition that we enjoy as Guard Positions, Scaled Mortar Range and members is, in every sense, as relevant today as during colonial times. Mortar Range; Demolition Ranges; Military Operations in Urban Terrain (MOUT) Ranges: Urban Assault Course, Shoothouse, Military Assault Course, and Infantry Squad FEDERAL MISSION STATEMENT Battle Course; Paintball Ranges; Land-Navigation Courses; Biathlon Maintain properly trained and equipped units available for prompt mobilization Range; and Hand-Grenade Range.
    [Show full text]