DOCSLIB.ORG

The Tameside UDP Written Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Tameside UDP Written Statement TAMESIDE UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN Adopted Plan 17th November 2004 CONTENTS PART 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................Page 2 Other Relevant Policies and Strategies ................................................................................. 3 Overview of the Borough ..................................................................................................... 5 Themes and Objectives for the New Plan ............................................................................ 6 Part 1 Policies ....................................................................................................................... 8 PART 2 Reasoned Justifications for Part 1 Policies ......................................................................... 14 Part 2 Policies and Reasoned Justifications Employment and the Local Economy ................................................................................ 25 Housing and Community Facilities .................................................................................... 39 Town Centres, Retailing and Leisure ................................................................................. 57 Countryside, Open Land, Sport and Recreation ................................................................. 65 Transportation and Access .................................................................................................. 81 Conservation and Enhancement of the Built Environment ................................................ 97 Nature Conservation, Trees and Woodland ...................................................................... 105 Mineral Working, Waste Management and Pollution Control ......................................... 111 Utilities and Energy .......................................................................................................... 121 Indicators to Measure Performance of the Plan ................................................................ 127 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... 128 Tameside Unitary Development Plan - Adopted Plan 17th November 2004 - Part 1 TAMESIDE UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN Adopted Plan 17th November 2004 PART 1 -1- Tameside Unitary Development Plan - Adopted Plan 17th November 2004 - Part 1 INTRODUCTION The Unitary Development Plan (UDP) is a land use planning document which the Council is required to produce by law, adopt and keep under review. Its purpose is to provide a framework for development and conservation over the whole of the Tameside area, to set out the main considerations on which planning applications in the Borough are determined, and to guide land use decisions by the Council and other agencies. The Need for Review The first Tameside UDP was adopted by the Council in September 1996, at which time it superseded all previous development plans. Maintaining an up to date and relevant development plan is important if the planning system is to be dynamic and effective, and if decisions on planning applications are to continue to be made in accordance with the plan rather than on an ad-hoc basis. Although there is no strict end date for UDP policies (except for housing land requirements which run until mid-2001) the Government expects that development plans should be reviewed at least once every 5 years, depending on local circumstances. Although many of the policies and proposals in the superseded plan were working well or are still important for the future of the Borough, others have either been implemented or overtaken by events, or have proved to be unnecessary or impractical. National planning policy guidance has continued to evolve since the UDP was first drawn up, especially the importance attached to sustainability and urban regeneration, and Tameside's own conditions, problems, needs and priorities have also changed in some respects. The previously adopted UDP is also perceived by many as unnecessarily long and complex and sometimes overly prescriptive. The Form of the Review The extent of the changes which need to be made to the previously adopted UDP are such that a replacement rather than an altered plan is appropriate. Many of the policies which have been inherited from the previously adopted UDP have been shortened or refined to try to make them clearer and more effective, and the proposals map has been simplified... The period covered by the replacement plan will be extended through to 2011. Consultations In line with Government advice, pre-deposit consultations for the plan review have been based around key issues. An Issues Paper was published by the Council in July 2000, summarising the guidance, strategies and local circumstances influencing the review and putting forward key themes and ideas on how the current plan might be changed. This was widely publicised and copies or notification of its availability sent directly to a large number of organisations thought likely to have an interest. In preparing the draft plan the Council has taken into account the comments received from the 68 individuals or organisations that responded to the Issues Paper. The first deposit draft of this replacement UDP was placed on deposit between 18th June and 30th July 2001. Written submissions were received from 149 different organisations and individuals during this six week period, containing 517 duly made objections and 112 representations of support. The Council has considered each of these submissions and numerous changes to the plan have been introduced with a view to resolving objections wherever possible. Other people who might be affected by these changes had the opportunity to object during the deposit period for the revised draft, which ran from 15th March to 26th April 2002. 47 new, duly made objections were made to the changes, along with 36 representations of support, whilst 291 of the original objections were eventually withdrawn. - 2 - Tameside Unitary Development Plan - Adopted Plan 17th November 2004 - Part 1 The outstanding objections were heard by an Inspector appointed by the First Secretary of State, at a public local inquiry which took place between 29th October and 8th November 2002 and which formally closed on 29th January 2003 after all written submissions had been received. The Inspector's report was received by the Council on 24th April 2003 and published on 18th June. The Council has considered the Inspector's recommendations, took a decision on each, and deposited a list of the modifications in October/November 2003. Objections to these were considered by the Council and as a result a further set of modifications was placed on deposit in July/August 2004. Objections to these were considered by the Council on 5th October 2004 where the decision was made to adopt the plan without further modification. The replacement plan therefore was adopted on 17th November 2004. Format of the Plan It is a legal requirement that the UDP is split into two parts. Part 1 comprises, along with this introduction, other relevant policies and strategies, a strategic overview of the Borough, themes and objectives for the new plan, and the Council's general policies for the development and use of land. Part 2 contains the more detailed policies and proposals for the development and use of land, and in particular those which will form the basis for deciding planning applications. It also includes reasoned justifications for both the Part 1 and Part 2 policies, which often also contain background information about relevant local circumstances. Throughout the document policies are distinguished by use of bold typeface, justifications by italic typeface, other material by normal typeface and headings by bold italic typeface. Part 2 is completed by the proposals map inside the back cover, showing site-specific proposals and area based policies on a geographical base. OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND STRATEGIES In preparing this replacement plan the Council has taken into account both national and regional planning policy guidance issued by the Government, and relevant local strategies which have been established by the Council and its partners, including the Vision for Tameside, the Community Plan and the Economic Development Strategy. National and Regional Guidance National policy is set out in Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPGs), the main principles of which are referred to where appropriate in the reasoned justifications to the policies of this plan. There is a programme to replace these with Planning Policy Statements but at the time of printing this document only five have been published. The latest version of Regional Planning Guidance for the North West (RPG13) was published by the Government Office for the North West in March 2003. This has now become the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) and will in future be referred to as such, providing a framework within which development plans and local transport plans are prepared. The overriding aim of RSS is to promote sustainable patterns of spatial development and physical change, with the region's economic, social and environmental interests being advanced together and supporting each other. The Core Development Principles of the RSS are economy in the use of land and buildings, enhancing the quality of life, quality in new development, promoting sustainable economic growth, competitiveness and social inclusion. The Spatial Development Framework establishes that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document
    • Herefordshire O Council Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document April 2008 0 0 hfdscouncil herefordshire.gov.uk Contents Page Summary 1 Part 1 Context 5 1.1 Purpose of Supplementary Planning Document 5 1.2 Consultation 5 1.3 Definitions and Purpose of Planning Obligations 6 1.4 Types and Use of Planning Obligations 6 1.5 Grampian Conditions 7 1.6 Planning Policy Context 7 1.7 Council Priorities 8 1.8 Community Involvement in Pre-Application Consultation 9 1.9 Sustainability Appraisal 9 Part 2 Code Of Practice 10 2.1 The Council’s Approach 10 2.2 Procedure for Negotiating a Planning Obligation 10 2.3 Monitoring 12 2.4 Development Viability 12 2.5 Management 12 Part 3 Community Infrastructure 15 3.1 Accessibility, Transport and Movement 15 3.2 Affordable Housing See Affordable Housing SPD 2021 20 3.3 Biodiversity 24 3.4 Community Services 26 3.5 Children and Young People 29 3.6 Flood Risk Management, Water Services and Pollution Control 33 3.7 Heritage and Archaeology 34 3.8 Landscape 35 3.9 Open Space, Sports and Recreation Facilities 36 3.10 Town Centres, Community Safety and Public Realm 42 3.11 Waste Reduction and Recycling 45 Appendices 46 1 UDP Policies 46 2 Average Occupancy per Dwelling 47 3 Employee/Floorspace Ratios 48 4 Costs of Providing CCTV 49 Figures S1 Thresholds for Planning Obligations 1 S2 Summary Table of Planning Obligations 4 1 Procedure for Negotiating, Preparing and Completing a Planning Obligation 14 2 Example of Transport Contributions 18 3 Transport Accessibility Zones 19 4 Commuted Payments for
    [Show full text]
  • Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report
    Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report February 2018 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Page Left Intentionally Blank January 2018 Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Infrastructure Planning Trans-Pennine Upgrade PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT Author: Various Version Date Status of Version Rev 1.0 26.01.18 Initial Draft Rev 2.0 02.02.18 Final Draft Rev 3.0 07.02.18 Final Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report Page Left Intentionally Blank Trans-Pennine Upgrade Preliminary Environmental Information Report CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background to the Scheme and this Report .............................................................. 1 1.2 The Consenting Process ........................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................................. 2 1.4 Structure of this PEIR ................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Responding to Consultation ...................................................................................... 3 1.6 Pre-Application Consultation Programme ................................................................. 3 2 THE SCHEME ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Peak Forest
    WW GUIDE THE PEAK FOREST AND ASHTON CANALS You begin in urban Manchester – and 21 miles later, you’re in a historic basin in the glorious Peak District, moored up beside a real pub. Richard Fairhurst savours a fine canal journey The Ashton Canal FOR MANY YEARS, THE ASHTON CANAL was synonymous with all that was wrong with urban waterways. The 1896 Oarsman’s Guide was uncompromising: “Its course is entirely through a manufacturing district with the usual unpleasant surroundings. The vapour rising from its waters caused by the factories on the banks, condensing their exhaust Bugsworth steam therein, is sometimes so thick as Basin. to make it diffi cult to see one’s way.” Downloaded by David A Calverley from waterwaysworld.com June 2012 Waterways World 71 WW GUIDE 1 1 Ancoats Lock 1 – By the 1960s, its star had sunk lower note the duplicated still. Though never formally closed, it was chamber. totally unnavigable: its channel dry, its lock-gates rotten or swinging loose. Local councillors and anxious parents demanded its infi lling. Its branches to Stockport and Hollinwood were abandoned, and the main line, like so many industrial urban waterways, looked set to go the same way. What saved it was an idea fi rst hatched in 1965: the Cheshire Ring. Adventurous holidaymakers were beginning to discover the canal system, and circular routes were perfect for a week’s holiday. The Ashton and adjacent canals would provide the ‘missing link’ in one such route. Volunteers from the Peak Forest Canal Society, the Inland Waterways Association, and (latterly) the new Waterway Recovery 2 Group set about bringing the canal back to life.
    [Show full text]
  • Source 12 AW.Indd
    Words Deborah Mulhearn Photographs Ian Lawson, Walter Menzies and courtesy British Waterways Cheshire’s beautiful and fascinating canals are at the forefront of the nation’s canal renaissance. Cheshire’s canals are perhaps the most diverse in the ago – to young and distinctly urban The Peak Forest Canal touches country. From the fascinating industrial heritage of the landlubbers are negotiating the locks. Boating Cheshire only briefl y, but has one of mighty Manchester Ship Canal, which cuts across the holiday companies are doing great business. its most spectacular features: the Northern edge of the county, to the dramatic Pennine The Cheshire Ring, a 97 mile long circular Marple Aqueduct and the fl ight of 16 scenery of the Macclesfi eld Canal in the east, and the route which is made up from parts of the locks that lift the canal 46m above serene beauty of the Llangollen Canal in the south-west Macclesfi eld Canal, the Peak Forest Canal, the Goyt Valley. The Trent & Mersey corner, they not only cover most of the county but also the Bridgewater Canal and the Trent & Mersey Canal, built to link the River Trent span the history of British canal building. Canal, has never been busier. and the River Mersey, was one of the Cheshire’s proximity to Liverpool and Manchester, “There’s a weird and wonderful mix of earliest canals to be completed, in the hub and heart of the industrial revolution, and to the features specifi c to Cheshire’s canals,” 1777. It runs for 92 miles and has River Mersey, meant that it was quickly criss-crossed explains Peter Birch of British Waterways even more locks – one section with by canals in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising Routes
    MaPs CaN Be BoUgHt At ThE MaRiNa, Cruising Routes Or OnLiNe FrOm AbCwEbChAnDlEr.CoM LlAnGoLlEn & ReTuRn ElLeSmErE PoRt & ReTuRn 7 Nights • Cruising Time Per day: 5.5 Hrs • Locks: 24 7 Nights • Cruising Time Per day: 6.5 Hrs • Locks: 48 • If you would like to travel to Llangollen, but were looking to • From Wrenbury you will travel up the Llangollen Canal to join the complete more locks, then start from Wrenbury Marina rather Shropshire Union Canal and travel up to the industrial town of than Whitchurch or Blackwater Meadow. Ellesmere Port. • The last locks before Llangollen are at New Marton, half way • Why not visit the Na�onal Waterways Museum which brings between Ellesmere and Chirk. together a unique fleet of historic boats and archives to tell the • From there on the canal clings to the hillside contours. An story of Britains canals and waterways? enchan�ng blend of aqueducts and tunnels will take you lock free through to Llangollen. ThE ChEsHiRe RiNg ThE FoUr CoUnTiEs RiNg 11-14 Nights • Cruising Time Per day: 6 Hrs • Locks: 137 • It is recommended to travel this ring clockwise, so heading up to 14 Nights • Cruising Time Per day: 6 Hrs • Locks: 132 Manchester. • Takes you along the wonderfully rural Staffordshire & • The ring takes in the whole of the Macclesfield Canal, parts of the Worcestershire Canal to Great Haywood Junc�on. Trent & Mersey, Bridgewater, Rochdale, Ashton and Peak Forest • Passing under a dis�nc�ve roving bridge, you join the Trent & Canals, providing a range of scenery. Mersey Canal heading north towards the Po�eries and Peak • Enjoy glorious scenery as the Macclesfield Canal skirts the edge District.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire Ring from Middlewich | UK Canal Boating
    UK Canal Boating Telephone : 01395 443545 UK Canal Boating Email : [email protected] Escape with a canal boating holiday! Booking Office : PO Box 57, Budleigh Salterton. Devon. EX9 7ZN. England. Cheshire Ring from Middlewich Cruise this route from : Middlewich View the latest version of this pdf Cheshire-Ring-from-Middlewich-Cruising-Route.html Cruising Days : 8.00 to 11.00 Cruising Time : 53.00 Total Distance : 97.00 Number of Locks : 92 Number of Tunnels : 6 Number of Aqueducts : 0 A fascinating trip that takes you through the heart of Manchester and the Peak District with its distinctive stone architecture. The Cheshire Ring is a canal cruising circuit or canal ring, which includes sections of six canals in and around Cheshire and Greater Manchester in North West England: the Ashton Canal, Peak Forest Canal, Macclesfield Canal, Trent and Mersey Canal, Bridgewater Canal and Rochdale Canal. It passes through contrasting landscapes between Manchester city centre and rural Cheshire with views of the Peak District and the Cheshire Plain. Moor at Castlefields to explore the city of Manchester, including Old Trafford, home of Manchester United F.C., the huge Arndale shopping centre and the Science & Industry Museum. The trip will let you enjoy glorious scenery as the Pennine Range overlooks the canal and, if time allows, detour along the Peak Forest canal to its terminus. Enjoy the stunning views from Marple and at Anderton pause to visit the fabulously restored boat lift which now operates throughout the cruising season to link the canal with the River Weaver. Cruising Notes Preston Brook Tunnel Tunnel times are as follows: Northbound: open on the hour, and remains open until 10 past the hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday 23Rd October 2018 2.00Pm the Etihad Stadium 93.20 Central Manchester City Football Club Sport City Manchester M11 3FF AUCTION VENUE
    Tuesday 23rd October 2018 2.00pm The Etihad Stadium 93.20 Central Manchester City Football Club Sport City Manchester M11 3FF AUCTION VENUE Etihad Campus Briscoe Lane Philips Park GAS Key: Bradford Road M60N A1 Entrances Bus Stops G Metrolink Stops GAS H GATE 2 Etihad Campus Car Parking 53, 217, 218 Etihad Stadium Joe M M L Manchester Regional Arena K A National Squash Centre ercer Tennis l a n J Centre U Main Entrance T Way u - The Colin Bell Stand r i CITY STORE n g F East Stand Entrance & TICKET OFFICE W a £ Cash Machine y BT CITY SQUARE A 6 t BARS & CAFE 0 e 1 e r 0 t S GATE 3 t c S u ibbon treet d National G a i Squash V £ w Centre A1 e As A2 hton Canal N B1 Z3 B2 Manchester Z1 C Y2 Regional D Arena Y1 Tuesday 23rd October 2018 X E W F V Philips Park Rd Rowsley G 2.00pm Street U H T J ASDA S A K1 K2 GATE 13 R P2 Commonwealth Way L1 P1 N2 L2 GATE 11 Citizens Way N1 M2 M1 J The Etihad Stadium CAR B DE ALERSHIP C Ashton New Road D Ashton New Road 188,216,217, 188,216,217, 218,231,236, 218,231,236, Gre 93.20 Central 237 237 Councillor St city@home GATE 7 y Mare Ln Manchester City Football Club Albert Street M60S/E Sport City Manchester M11 3FF Visitors directions on the day Everyone attending the auction should enter via gate 7 on Ashton New Road (A662) and park in the adjacent Car Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Document [Transplant and Rehabilitation]
    Briefing Document [Transplant and Rehabilitation] Laura Brett Unit 5b Hybrid Territories Transplant and Rehabilitation Atherosclerosis Discourse “ ... all the money goes up top, while the infrastructure wastes away from neglect. The famous skyline is a cheap trick now, a sleight-of-hand to draw your eye from the truth, as illusory as a bodybuilder with osteoporosis... ” [Andrew Vachss, Mask Market] [Introduction] Page 1 [Introduction] Page 2 The Cheshire Ring chesh-ire A collection of post-industrial places stitched together by a canal circuit that knows no boundaries. The circulatory canal system connects to microcirculatory waterways from in and around Cheshire and venturing further, terri- tories of North West England. At the edge of the ring remains a place [Runcorn], once the backbone of industrial trade, fundamental for its prosperity that so heavily depended on its waterways. Now, stands a fragile town lingering on distantly dissipating memories. The prognosis would advocate [Runcorn], a case of abandonment. [The Site] Page 3 Cheshire Ring Atherosclerosis Discourse The Site_Runcorn [The Site] Page 4 Project 1 Project 2 Dissection Stent An investigation of the compo- A device of plastic or sprung nent parts of a whole and their metal mesh inserted into a relations in making up the tubular structure, such as a whole. blood vessel, to provide support Project 1 provided an opportu- Project 2 advanced the knowl- nity to explore a place [site] edge and experience acquired more in depth than before, by dissecting and furthered this basing its ideals on the concept by intending a design to form of peeling back information and that would alter the site itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Tameside Locality Assessments GMSF 2020
    November 2020 Transport Locality Assessments Introductory Note and Assessments – Tameside allocations GMSF 2020 Table of contents 1. Background 2 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 2 1.2 Policy Context – The National Planning Policy Framework 3 1.3 Policy Context – Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 5 1.4 Structure of this Note 9 2. Site Selection 10 2.1 The Process 10 2.2 Greater Manchester Accessibility Levels 13 3. Approach to Strategic Modelling 15 4. Approach to Technical Analysis 17 4.1 Background 17 4.2 Approach to identifying Public Transport schemes 18 4.3 Mitigations and Scheme Development 19 5. Conclusion 23 6. GMSF Allocations List 24 Appendix A - GMA38 Ashton Moss West Locality Assessment A1 Appendix B - GMA39 Godley Green Garden Village Locality Assessment B1 Appendix C - GMA40 Land South of Hyde Locality Assessment C1 1 1. Background 1.1 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) 1.1.1 The GMSF is a joint plan of all ten local authorities in Greater Manchester, providing a spatial interpretation of the Greater Manchester Strategy which will set out how Greater Manchester should develop over the next two decades up to the year 2037. It will: ⚫ identify the amount of new development that will come forward across the 10 Local Authorities, in terms of housing, offices, and industry and warehousing, and the main areas in which this will be focused; ⚫ ensure we have an appropriate supply of land to meet this need; ⚫ protect the important environmental assets across the conurbation; ⚫ allocate sites for employment and housing outside of the urban area; ⚫ support the delivery of key infrastructure, such as transport and utilities; ⚫ define a new Green Belt boundary for Greater Manchester.
    [Show full text]
  • LFRMS Consultation Report Appendices
    Appendix A DRAFT LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY DOCUMENT LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR STOCKPORT February 2016 Foreword by Executive Member It is with great pleasure that we can present to the public the progress we have made and the improvements that we plan to undertake to re-establish Stockport Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority for the Stockport area. We have made great progress in a short period of time and this Strategy endorses that. I certainly accept the new duties and responsibilities the Council has to help our community and look forward to developing a closer relationship with residents and other multi-disciplined agencies with an interest in water and its impact on the built environment and natural environment. I welcome and applaud the support the Council has from its partners in risk management. The beauty, amenity and critical resource of water should certainly be appreciated but also acknowledged that the power of nature can deliver adverse effects that can have a huge impact on us all and for many years. The reality of major flood events in Stockport is relatively small in comparison to other areas, but some risk will remain in areas with large urbanisation and buried waterways. Flood risk management requires the support of all key stakeholders including local residents, organisations and businesses as we all have responsibilities. If we work together then the potential impacts of floods in Stockport can be minimised. 2 Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 7 1.1. Background 7 1.2. Aims of the Strategy Error! Bookmark not defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009
    The River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Directions 2009 The Secretary of State and the Welsh Ministers, with the agreement of the Secretary of State to the extent that there is any effect in England or those parts of Wales that are within the catchment areas of the rivers Dee, Wye and Severn, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 40(2) of the Environment Act 1995(a) and now vested in them(b), and having consulted the Environment Agency, hereby give the following Directions to the Environment Agency for the implementation of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy(c): Citation and commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Directions may be cited as the River Basin Districts Typology, Standards and Groundwater threshold values (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Direction 2009 and shall come into force on 22nd December 2009. Interpretation 2.—(1) In these Directions— ―the Agency‖ means the Environment Agency; ―the Groundwater Directive‖ means Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration(d); ―the Priority Substances Directive‖ means Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy(e); ―threshold value‖ has the same meaning as in the Groundwater Directive; and ―the Directive‖ means Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Trafford Local Plan: Core Strategy (Adopted January 2012)
    TRAFFORD LOCAL PLAN: CORE STRATEGY Adopted January 2012 Trafford Local Plan - Core Strategy: Adopted January 2012 www.trafford.gov.uk Development Plan Document 1 Trafford Local Plan - Core Strategy: Adopted January 2012 2 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................5 2 THE PROFILE ...........................................................................................................................................................................................7 3 THE VISION FOR TRAFFORD ...................................................................................................................................................23 4 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES..............................................................................................................................................................25 5 PLACE OBJECTIVES .........................................................................................................................................................................27 6 THE DELIVERY STRATEGY .........................................................................................................................................................47 7 KEY DIAGRAM ....................................................................................................................................................................................48 8 STRATEGIC
    [Show full text]