DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 10 Priority Programs and Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Project for Community-based Sustainable Development Master Plan of Qeshm Island toward “Eco-Island” Final Report CHAPTER 10 PRIORITY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS 10.1 Selection of Priority Programs and Projects 10.1.1 Establishment of evaluation criteria The projects and programs are proposed in the sector development plan of the ECO-QESHM Master Plan. Among these projects and programs is a set of priority projects, which have been selected by scoring the candidate projects in relation to the evaluation criteria. The candidate projects are the projects and programs that should be commenced in the short term until 2021. They will be preferably completed in the short term, but timing of their completion can be expanded to the medium term until 2026 and the long term until 2036. The evaluation standard is established to reflect the development objectives proposed in the ECO- QESHM Master Plan. The development objectives include four aspects, namely, the economy, the environment, society and human resources. The evaluation standard also includes urgency as shown in Table 2.1.1. Evaluation criteria are constructed as broadly as possible for each evaluation standard. The objectives of establishing the criteria this broadly are to avoid missing out on important requirements for the priority projects. Even though the criteria overlap with different evaluation standards, the overlapped criteria are considered to be representative of the significance of such criteria in order to achieve the vision behind the eco-island development. The evaluation criteria for economic enhancement constitute the creation of job opportunities, livelihood improvement and regional economic growth. The promotion of export products, logistics and direct investment are also included in order to meet the role of the free zone (FZ) on Qeshm Island in terms of economic enhancement standards. The evaluation criteria are established for social and environment purposes to conserve the rich social and environmental resources on the island too. Social participation and administrative ability improvement are included in the evaluation criteria. The local residents expressed their needs concerning balanced development in the consultation meetings that were convened in process of formulating the ECO-QESHM Master Plan. The vitalization of central and western parts of the island with improved social services has been taken into consideration in the evaluation criteria. First and foremost, human resources development is important in terms of realizing the ECO-QESHM Master Plan. The evaluation criteria include the promotion of small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs), research and development, and awareness-raising of the eco-island concept. As a whole, 21 evaluation criteria have been agreed, as shown in Table 10.1.1. 10-1 The Project for Community-based Sustainable Development Master Plan of Qeshm Island toward “Eco-Island” Final Report Table 10.1.1 Evaluation Standards for Priority Projects. Evaluation standards Evaluation criteria 1. Economic 1.1 Creation of job opportunities for local residents enhancement 1.2 Livelihood improvement among local residents 1.3 Regional economic growth contributing to the local economy 1.4 Export promotion and logistics to the mainland and foreign countries in order to contribute to the local economy 1.5 Investment promotion from the mainland and foreign countries to contribute to the local economy 2. Social 2.1 Social participation of the local community including various stakeholders enhancement 2.2 Promotion of tradition and culture 2.3 Promotion of social services, including water supply, electricity, education and health 2.4 Enhancement of administrative ability for implementation 2.5 Balanced development to vitalize the central and western parts of the island 3. Environmental 3.1 Environmental management in marine and terrestrial areas enhancement 3.2 Vitalization of marine and terrestrial biodiversity 3.3 Reduction of environmental pollution by economic activities 3.4 Promotion of environmentally friendly living conditions, including solid waste management and wastewater management 3.5 Reduction of CO2 emissions and energy-saving 4. Human resources 4.1 Promotion of SMEs enhancement 4.2 Promotion of research and development suitable for Qeshm Island 4.3 Promotion of higher education suitable for Qeshm Island 4.4 Awareness-raising of the eco-island concept focusing on the environment, tradition and culture 4.5 Promotion of appropriate and advanced technology 5. Urgency 5.1 Urgency of project implementation Source: JICA Project Team 10.1.2 Selection of priority programs and projects Fifty-nine projects are selected for the candidate projects from the sector development plan. The candidate projects are evaluated in respect of the evaluation criteria. A project largely contributing to the requirement defined according to an evaluation criterion is given two points. One point is for a limited contribution. The total score is estimated for each candidate project. The candidate projects are classified into four categories, namely, economic development, infrastructure development, environmental management, and regional and community development. The priority projects are selected from the candidate projects with the third-highest evaluation points in each category. The number of priority projects is 19, as shown in Table 10.1.2. 10-2 The Project for Community-based Sustainable Development Master Plan of Qeshm Island toward “Eco-Island” Final Report Table 10.1.2 Evaluation Standards for Priority Projects. Category Subcategory Number of Number of candidate priority projects projects Economic development Agriculture and animal husbandry 11 0 Fishery 7 4 Industrial development 5 1 Tourism 4 2 Infrastructure development Transportation 6 0 Water supply 2 1 Sewage treatment 3 1 Solid waste management 7 1 Power supply and renewable energy 2 1 Environmental management Marine ecosystem management 3 1 Inland ecosystem management 4 3 Geopark management 1 1 Institutional system 1 0 Regional and community development Regional development 2 2 Community development 1 1 Total 59 19 Source: JICA Project Team Table 10.1.3 shows the evaluation results for each candidate project. 10-3 The Project for Community-based Sustainable Development Master Plan of Qeshm Island toward “Eco-Island” Final Report 10-4 The Project for Community-based Sustainable Development Master Plan of Qeshm Island toward “Eco-Island” Final Report Table 10.1.3 Selection of Priority Programs and Projects 5. Project 1. Economic enhancement 2. Social enhancement 3. Environmental enhancement 4. Human resources enhancement Total Urgency contributing to the local to contributing in marine and terrestrial terrestrial and marine in stics to the mainland and stics to the mainland roject implementation implementation roject lly friendly living conditions conditions living friendly lly mthe mainland and foreign ices including water supply, water supply, including ices bute to the local economy the local economy to bute co-island concept focusing on concept focusing co-island te and advanced technology advanced technology te and cation and vocational training and vocational cation areas areas ovement for local residents local residents ovement for emissions and energy-saving emissions and energy-saving activities activities economy economy 2 the island island the management management Qeshm Island Qeshm Island various stakeholders various stakeholders 4.1 Promotion of SMEs 4.1 Promotion of suitable for Qeshm Island Qeshm Island for suitable electricity, education and health education and health electricity, 2.2 Promotion of tradition and culture culture and tradition of 2.2 Promotion the environment, tradition, and culture culture and tradition, environment, the countries to contribute countries to to the local economy 1.2 Livelihood impr 5.1 Urgency concerning p concerning 5.1 Urgency including solid waste management and wastewater and wastewater management waste solid including 3.5 Reduction of CO of 3.5 Reduction 1.1 Creation of job opportunities for local residents for local residents job opportunities 1.1 Creation of foreign countries to contri foreign countries 3.2 Vitalization of marine and terrestrial biodiversity biodiversity terrestrial and of marine Vitalization 3.2 3.3 Reduction of environmental pollution by economic by economic pollution environmental of 3.3 Reduction 4.5 Promotion of appropria 4.5 Promotion of 1.4 Export promotion and logi promotion 1.4 Export 1.3 Regional economic growth economic 1.3 Regional 4.2 Promotion of research and development suitable for development research and 4.2 Promotion of 2.3 Promotion of social serv 2.3 Promotion of 3.1 Environmental management 3.1 Environmental 1.5 Investment promotion fro promotion 1.5 Investment 2.1 Social participation by the local community including including community local by the participation 2.1 Social 4.3 Promotion of higher edu higher 4.3 Promotion of 2.5 Balanced development to vitalize the center and west of west and center the to vitalize development 2.5 Balanced 4.4 Awareness-raising of the e the of Awareness-raising 4.4 3.4 Promotion of environmenta 3.4 Promotion of 2.4 Enhancement of administrative ability for implementation implementation for ability administrative of 2.4 Enhancement Economic development Agriculture and animal husbandry AG-1 Technical guidance on agricultural 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 12 production and farm household economy AG-2 Promotion of apiculture/mangrove 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
Recommended publications
  • Geological Parks, Eco-Tourism and Sustainable Development

    Geological Parks, Eco-Tourism and Sustainable Development

    3rd International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation (MSMI 2016) Geological Parks, Eco-tourism and Sustainable Development Jian-Xinog Qin Institute of Regional Geography &Tourism Development, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu, China E-mail: [email protected] Abstract—Based on the comparative analysis of the definition From the definition we can see, both in function and of geological parks, ecological tourism and sustainable purpose is consistent, and emphasize the following three development, this paper discusses the dialectical relationship binding: combination of local economic development and between the geological parks, ecological tourism and the protection of natural and cultural ecological system; sustainable development. The geological park is an important appreciate the nature and know the combination of nature; part of the ecological tourism resources, and the geological protection ecological environment and widespread public park is an important place and an ideal place for the awareness of protection combined. development of eco-tourism. Geological park and ecological tourism development has a similar goal system, development II. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE characteristics, development principles and contents. GEOLOGICAL PARK AND ECOLOGICAL TOURISM Geological park is an important part of the theory of sustainable development, is the embodiment of sustainable A. Geological relic resource is an important part of the tourism. The tourism development of geopark is a concrete ecological
  • Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan2)

    Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan2)

    MALAYSIA NATIONAL PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SHARK (PLAN2) DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRO-BASED INDUSTRY MALAYSIA 2014 First Printing, 2014 Copyright Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 2014 All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the Department of Fisheries Malaysia. Published in Malaysia by Department of Fisheries Malaysia Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Malaysia, Level 1-6, Wisma Tani Lot 4G2, Precinct 4, 62628 Putrajaya Malaysia Telephone No. : 603 88704000 Fax No. : 603 88891233 E-mail : [email protected] Website : http://dof.gov.my Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data ISBN 978-983-9819-99-1 This publication should be cited as follows: Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 2014. Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan 2), Ministry of Agriculture and Agro- based Industry Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia. 50pp SUMMARY Malaysia has been very supportive of the International Plan of Action for Sharks (IPOA-SHARKS) developed by FAO that is to be implemented voluntarily by countries concerned. This led to the development of Malaysia’s own National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark or NPOA-Shark (Plan 1) in 2006. The successful development of Malaysia’s second National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan 2) is a manifestation of her renewed commitment to the continuous improvement of shark conservation and management measures in Malaysia.
  • THE CINCINNATI MYTH by Eliana Johnson Saturday Night Massacre, and IRS Discrimination Wasn’T Just the Work of Rogue Agents

    THE CINCINNATI MYTH by Eliana Johnson Saturday Night Massacre, and IRS Discrimination Wasn’T Just the Work of Rogue Agents

    2013_07_01 subscribe:cover61404-postal.qxd 6/11/2013 8:18 PM Page 1 July 1, 2013 $4.99 JAY NORDLINGER: The Left’s Racial Putdowns KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON ON RAND AND STEINBECK JOHN J. MILLER HENRY OLSEN: IS RAND PAUL THE ANSWER? ON HARRY JAFFA Daniiel Foster w eliiaannaa Johnson w roobb lloonngg $4.99 tthhee eeDDittoorss 26 0 74820 08155 6 www.nationalreview.com base:milliken-mar 22.qxd 6/10/2013 2:27 PM Page 1 TOC:QXP-1127940144.qxp 6/12/2013 2:33 PM Page 1 Contents JULY 1, 2013 | VOLUME LXV, NO. 12 | www.nationalreview.com ON THE COVER Page 16 The Cincinnati Myth John J. Miller on Harry V. Jaffa p. 32 Two Cincinnati employees have told the House Oversight Committee that BOOKS, ARTS they were taking orders from Washington. One of those employees told & MANNERS the committee he began singling out tea- 41 LINCOLN’S PATH, STILL Jay Winik reviews Lincoln party applications at the request of a Unbound: How an Ambitious supervisor who told him “Washington, Young Railsplitter Saved the American Dream—And D.C., wanted some cases.” Eliana Johnson How We Can Do It Again, by Rich Lowry. COVER: ROMAN GENN 42 GREATNESS IN A DARK TIME ARTICLES Charles J. Cooper reviews Saving Justice: Watergate, the 16 THE CINCINNATI MYTH by Eliana Johnson Saturday Night Massacre, and IRS discrimination wasn’t just the work of rogue agents. Other Adventures of a Solicitor General, by Robert H. Bork. 18 ONE-PARTY TAXMEN by Daniel Foster Is it time to un-reform the civil service? 45 EPIC OF A NATION Daniel Johnson reviews Flight of 21 BUREAUCRATIC ROT by Rob Long the Eagle: The Grand Strategies A government, like a fish, decays from its guts.
  • The George Wright Forum

    The George Wright Forum

    The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 27 number 1 • 2010 Origins Founded in 1980, the George Wright Society is organized for the pur­ poses of promoting the application of knowledge, fostering communica­ tion, improving resource management, and providing information to improve public understanding and appreciation of the basic purposes of natural and cultural parks and equivalent reserves. The Society is dedicat­ ed to the protection, preservation, and management of cultural and natural parks and reserves through research and education. Mission The George Wright Society advances the scientific and heritage values of parks and protected areas. The Society promotes professional research and resource stewardship across natural and cultural disciplines, provides avenues of communication, and encourages public policies that embrace these values. Our Goal The Society strives to he the premier organization connecting people, places, knowledge, and ideas to foster excellence in natural and cultural resource management, research, protection, and interpretation in parks and equivalent reserves. Board of Directors ROLF DIA.MANT, President • Woodstock, Vermont STEPHANIE T(K)"1'1IMAN, Vice President • Seattle, Washington DAVID GKXW.R, Secretary * Three Rivers, California JOHN WAITHAKA, Treasurer * Ottawa, Ontario BRAD BARR • Woods Hole, Massachusetts MELIA LANE-KAMAHELE • Honolulu, Hawaii SUZANNE LEWIS • Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming BRENT A. MITCHELL • Ipswich, Massachusetts FRANK J. PRIZNAR • Gaithershnrg, Maryland JAN W. VAN WAGTENDONK • El Portal, California ROBERT A. WINFREE • Anchorage, Alaska Graduate Student Representative to the Board REBECCA E. STANFIELD MCCOWN • Burlington, Vermont Executive Office DAVID HARMON,Executive Director EMILY DEKKER-FIALA, Conference Coordinator P. O. Box 65 • Hancock, Michigan 49930-0065 USA 1-906-487-9722 • infoldgeorgewright.org • www.georgewright.org Tfie George Wright Forum REBECCA CONARD & DAVID HARMON, Editors © 2010 The George Wright Society, Inc.
  • An Exploration of Environmental Values in the Asian, Developing

    An Exploration of Environmental Values in the Asian, Developing

    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 8-2016 An Exploration of Environmental Values in the Asian, Developing-World Context of Dong Van Karst Plateau Global Geopark, Vietnam Madeline Duda Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Duda, Madeline, "An Exploration of Environmental Values in the Asian, Developing-World Context of Dong Van Karst Plateau Global Geopark, Vietnam" (2016). All Theses. 2475. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2475 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN EXPLORATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES IN THE ASIAN, DEVELOPING-WORLD CONTEXT OF DONG VAN KARST PLATEAU GLOBAL GEOPARK, VIETNAM A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management by Madeline Duda August 2016 Accepted by: Robert B. Powell, Committee Chair Jeffrey C. Hallo Brett A. Wright ABSTRACT It has been generally assumed that individuals’ environmental values are influenced by culture, experiences, social norms, economic standing, among others. However, to date research on held environmental values has focused primarily on the developed world context. To address this gap, this research explores the environmental values of
  • Frequently Asked Questions About UNESCO Global Geoparks – General Information, Definitions, Governance and Framing Issues

    Frequently Asked Questions About UNESCO Global Geoparks – General Information, Definitions, Governance and Framing Issues

    FAQs general public Frequently asked questions about UNESCO Global Geoparks – General information, definitions, governance and framing issues What is a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Definition • What are the aims of a UNESCO Global Geopark? • What are the essential factors to be considered before creating a UNESCO Global Geopark? • How are UNESCO Global Geoparks established and managed? • Has a UNESCO Global Geopark a required minimum or a maximum size? • Is a UNESCO Global Geopark a new category of protected area? • Is there a limited number of UNESCO Global Geoparks within any one country? • What are typical activities within a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Do UNESCO Global Geoparks do scientific research? • What does community involvement and empowerment entail in a UNESCO Global Geopark? • How does a YNESCO Global Geopark deal with natural resources? • Can industrial activities and construction projects take place in a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Is the selling of any original geological material (e.g. rocks, minerals, and fossils) permitted within a UNESCO Global Geopark? • What to do if a National Geoparks Network exists in a country? • What is the Global Geoparks Network? UNESCO Global Geoparks among UNESCO designations and the role of UNESCO • What is the difference between UNESCO Global Geoparks, Biosphere Reserves and World Heritage Sites? • What is the role of UNESCO? • Does UNESCO provide training courses? What is a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Definition UNESCO Global Geoparks are single, unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with a holistic concept of protection, education and sustainable development. A UNESCO Global Geopark comprises a number of geological heritage sites of special scientific importance, rarity or beauty.
  • Izu Peninsula Geopark Promotion Council

    Izu Peninsula Geopark Promotion Council

    Contents A. Identification of the Area ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 A.1 Name of the Proposed Geopark ........................................................................................................................................... 1 A.2 Location of the Proposed Geopark ....................................................................................................................................... 1 A.3 Surface Area, Physical and Human Geographical Characteristics ....................................................................................... 1 A.3.1 Physical Geographical Characteristics .......................................................................................................................... 1 A.3.2 Human Geographical Charactersitics ........................................................................................................................... 3 A.4 Organization in charge and Management Structure ............................................................................................................. 5 A.4.1 Izu Peninsula Geopark Promotion Council ................................................................................................................... 5 A.4.2 Structure of the Management Organization .................................................................................................................. 6 A.4.3 Supporting Units/ Members
  • Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis Based on Bibliometric and Sustainability Indicators Using Ordination Techniques

    Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis Based on Bibliometric and Sustainability Indicators Using Ordination Techniques

    land Article Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis Based on Bibliometric and Sustainability Indicators Using Ordination Techniques Boglárka Németh, Károly Németh * and Jon N. Procter School of Agriculture and Environment, Volcanic Risk Solutions, Turitea Campus, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; [email protected] (B.N.); [email protected] (J.N.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-27-479-1484 Abstract: Ordination methods are used in ecological multivariate statistics in order to reduce the number of dimensions and arrange individual variables along environmental variables. Geoheritage designation is a new challenge for conservation planning. Quantification of geoheritage to date is used explicitly for site selection, however, it also carries significant potential to be one of the indicators of sustainable development that is delivered through geosystem services. In order to achieve such a dominant position, geoheritage needs to be included in the business as usual model of conservation planning. Questions about the quantification process that have typically been addressed in geoheritage studies can be answered more directly by their relationships to world development indicators. We aim to relate the major informative geoheritage practices to underlying trends of successful geoheritage implementation through statistical analysis of countries with the highest trackable geoheritage interest. Correspondence analysis (CA) was used to obtain information on how certain indicators bundle together. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was used Citation: Németh, B.; Németh, K.; to detect sets of factors to determine positive geoheritage conservation outcomes. The analysis Procter, J.N. Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis resulted in ordination diagrams that visualize correlations among determinant variables translated Based on Bibliometric and to links between socio-economic background and geoheritage conservation outcomes.
  • Optimal Storage Conditions for Fresh Farmed Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus) Fillets

    Optimal Storage Conditions for Fresh Farmed Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus) Fillets

    Optimal storage conditions for fresh farmed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fillets By: CYPRIAN OGOMBE ODOLI Supervisors: Sigurjón Arason and Emilía Martinsdóttir MS committee: Hannes Magnússon, Hélène L. Lauzon and Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTERS IN SCIENCE (60 ECTS units) Department of Food Science and Nutrition University of Iceland May 2009 Optimal storage conditions for fresh farmed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fillets Cyprian Ogombe Odoli Supervisors: Sigurjón Arason and Emilía Martinsdóttir MS committee: Hannes Magnússon, Hélène L. Lauzon and Kolbrún Sveinsdóttir Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTERS IN SCIENCE (60 ECTS units) Department of Food Science and Nutrition Faculty of Science University of Iceland May 2009 Declaration I wish to declare that this work has sole been done by me and has never been submitted at any other university before. ___________________ Cyprian Ogombe Odoli Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my daughter Sharon for growing up at early age without seeing her father. More so, my beloved wife Lillian Awuor for accepting a lonesome life while I pursuit academic accomplishment. ii Abstract The main aim was to establish optimal storage conditions for fresh tilapia fillets, by determining its shelf life from the sensory and microbiological evaluation, as well as monitoring its physical-chemical properties. With this intent, Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) farmed in recirculation aquaculture system was filleted and packaged in 100% air and 50% CO2: 50% N2 MA prior to storage at different temperature; 1˚C and -1˚C. Initial samples from filleting (control d0) were also evaluated for comparison.
  • Cold Chain in Seafood Industry

    Cold Chain in Seafood Industry

    COLD CHAIN IN SEAFOOD INDUSTRY Alex Augusto Gonçalves1, Ph.D and Francisco Blaha2, MSc. Abstract: When seafood is freshly caught eating quality is high, but over time quality will deteriorate and eventually will become unsuitable for consumption. Maintenance of the cold chain and careful handling are a fundamental part in minimizing seafood spoilage. The cold chain in seafood industry is a temperature chain and begins once the seafood is caught. From the quality and regulatory perspective fresh seafood means that has been stored at 0°C and for frozen seafood it means –18°C or colder (from the sea to the consumer). The cold chain is broken every time the temperature of the seafood rises above 1°C. Fluctuations in the cold chain increases quality loss, these losses cannot be reversed by any means after the event. There are many avoidable and unavoidable occurrences that cause fluctuation in the cold chain. Good chilling and/or freezing practices on board harvest vessels are a condition sine qua non for maximizing the best possible quality of all seafoods. Best practices on seafood handling and the minimization of temperature fluctuations are paramount for seafood distributed under refrigeration (i.e., chilled and/or frozen) to maintain its quality and maximize its shelf–life. The present chapter addresses some of the developments in seafood cold chain under four mainly headings: i) cold chain in seafood industry; ii) selected aspects of refrigeration (chilling and freezing) process (including equipment and storage conditions); iii) safety and shelf–life issues in seafood cold chain; iv) regulation and legislation. 1.
  • UNESCO Global Geoparks Contributing

    UNESCO Global Geoparks Contributing

    UNESCO Global Geoparks Sustainable Development Goals Are single, unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with United Nations UNESCO a holistic concept of protection, education and sustainable Educational, Scientific and Global Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms Goal 11: Make cities and human Cultural Organization Geoparks development. A UNESCO Global Geopark uses its geological heritage, in connection with all other aspects of the area’s everywhere settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and natural and cultural heritage, to enhance awareness and (especially target 1.5) sustainable understanding of key issues facing society, such as using Earth’s (especially target 11.4) resources sustainably, mitigating the effects of climate change and Disaster risk reduction is essential to ending poverty reducing the impact of natural disasters. By raising awareness of the and fostering sustainable development. The bottom- Protecting, safeguarding and celebrating our importance of the area’s geological heritage in history and society up approach of the UNESCO Global Geoparks cultural and natural heritage are the foundation today, UNESCO Global Geoparks give local people a sense of reduces the vulnerability of local communities to of the holistic approach of the UNESCO Global pride in their region and strengthen their identification with the area. extreme events and other shocks and disasters Geoparks. UNESCO Global Geoparks aim to give UNESCO Global The creation of innovative local enterprises, new jobs and high quality through active risk awareness and resilience local people a sense of pride in their region and training courses is stimulated as new sources of revenue are training.
  • Projects Funded Through the Atlantic Fisheries Fund Announced on December 16, 2020

    Projects Funded Through the Atlantic Fisheries Fund Announced on December 16, 2020

    Projects Funded through the Atlantic Fisheries Fund Announced on December 16, 2020 Recipient Location Project Description Project Costs AFF AFF Pillar Contribution Grieg NL Marystown Purchase and install $926,045 $694,534 Infrastructure Nurseries Ltd. salmon vaccination equipment. Merasheen Merasheen Island Purchase and install optical $124,930 $99,900 Infrastructure Oyster Farms eye sorter for oyster Inc. grading. LBA Little Bay Arm Purchase and install $127,779 $99,900 Infrastructure Enterprises mussel declumper and Ltd. grader. Notre Dame Triton Purchase and install $120,588 $96,470 Infrastructure Bay Mussel mussel socking equipment. Farms Miawpukek Conne River Purchase and install a $899,583 $319,623 Infrastructure First Nation robotic net cleaning system to clean salmon aquaculture nets. Newfoundland Newfoundland Mussel and oyster $583,837 $467,070 Infrastructure Aquaculture and Labrador inventory and product Industry quality maintenance during Association COVID-19. Newfoundland Milltown Purchase of robotic net $1,752,339 $1,261,754 Infrastructure Aqua Service cleaning systems Ltd. for aquaculture pens. Bobby Noble Lewisporte Purchase and install $250,771 $99,882 Infrastructure automated longline system CRS Fishing Grates Cove Purchase and install $136,960 $99,900 Infrastructure Enterprises automated longline system Ltd. Challenger 92 Fogo Island Purchase and install $102,584 $82,067 Infrastructure Ltd. automated longline system Reginald Baine Harbour Purchase and install $9,786 $7,829 Infrastructure Keating automated jiggers and insulated boxes. Jerome Ward South East Bight Purchase and install $4,896 $3,917 Infrastructure automated jiggers and insulated boxes. Matthew Pasadena Purchase and install $21,891 $17,513 Infrastructure Rumbolt automated jiggers. Mervin Hollett Arnold's Cove Purchase and install $17,991 $12,515 Infrastructure automated jiggers and insulated boxes.