Simmonsa,*, Timothy Y

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Simmonsa,*, Timothy Y mycological research 113 (2009) 450–460 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres Lobulomycetales, a new order in the Chytridiomycota D. Rabern SIMMONSa,*, Timothy Y. JAMESb, Allen F. MEYERc, Joyce E. LONGCOREa aSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA bDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA cDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA article info abstract Article history: The Chytridiales, one of the four orders in the Chytridiomycetes (Chytridiomycota), is polyphy- Received 13 February 2008 letic, but contains several well-supported clades. One of these clades is referred to as the Received in revised form Chytriomyces angularis clade, and the phylogenetic placement of this group within the Chy- 23 October 2008 tridiomycetes is uncertain. The morphology and zoospore ultrastructure of C. angularis have Accepted 13 November 2008 been studied using LM and were shown to differ from those of the type species of Chytrio- Published online 25 December 2008 myces, which is in the Chytridiaceae and is phylogenetically distinct from the C. angularis Corresponding Editor: clade. In this study, chytrids with morphologies or rDNA sequences similar to C. angularis, Gordon W. Beakes including two isolates of the morphologically similar C. poculatus, were isolated and their phylogenetic relationships determined using molecular sequence data. Results of Bayesian Keywords: and MP analyses of nuSSU and partial nuLSU rDNA sequences grouped the new isolates Chytridium polysiphoniae and the type isolate of C. angularis in a monophyletic clade within the Chytridiomycota Clydaea but distinct from the Chytridiaceae. Zoospores of isolates examined using TEM had ultra- Lobulomyces structural features similar to those of C. angularis. Genetic analyses, ultrastructural data, Maunachytrium and morphology support the establishment of a new order Lobulomycetales, placement of C. angularis and C. poculatus in a new genus (Lobulomyces), and description of additional taxa, which we have named Clydaea vesicula and Maunachytrium keaense. ª 2009 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Introduction placed C. angularis in the genus Chytriomyces, but noted that the zoospore ultrastructure and morphology of C. Some species of chytrids have characteristic morphologies angularis differed from C. hyalinus, the type of the genus that make them easily recognisable; Chytriomyces poculatus, (Letcher et al. 2005). Longcore (1992) hypothesised that C. a chytrid reported from three continents, is an example of angularis might represent a new genus, but waited to de- these. The C. poculatus zoosporangium is monocentric, scribe such a genus until more chytrids were isolated that operculate, elongate, and surrounded by a ‘ghostly, loose had light microscopic-level and ultrastructural characters veil’ (Sparrow & Lange 1977), or cupules (Willoughby & in common with the species. Townley 1961). Researchers noted non-cupuled forms of Analyses of sequence data (James et al. 2000; Letcher et al. C. poculatus (Booth 1971a, 1971b; Dogma 1969), but it was 2005) consistently place C. angularis by itself, within the Chytri- not until C. angularis (Longcore 1992) was brought into diomycota, but outside of phylogenetically well-supported pure culture and determined not to form cupules that these groups that coincide with groups based on ultrastructural two species were recognised as being distinct. Because of data (Barr 1980, 1990). James et al. (2006) included one GenBank its similarity to C. poculatus, Longcore (1992) provisionally submission that grouped with C. angularis, Chytridium * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ1 207 581 2954. E-mail address: [email protected] 0953-7562/$ – see front matter ª 2009 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2008.11.019 Lobulomycetales, a new order in the Chytridiomycota 451 polysiphoniae. This marine chytrid isolate has since been lost (Ku¨ pper, pers. comm.) and no zoosporic ultrastructural data Materials and methods have been published. Ku¨ pper et al. (2006) sequenced C. polysi- phoniae and included five sequences of uncultured organisms Chytrid isolates, medium optimisation and temperature in a nuSSU rDNA phylogeny that grouped these isolates with maxima Chytriomyces angularis. Analyses of molecular and ultrastructural data have sup- Isolates examined in this study are listed in Table 1. Because ported major taxonomic changes in the Chytridiales, including little is known about habitat preferences of members of this the description of the Rhizophydiales from the Chytridiales group, other than that Chytriomyces poculatus has been (Letcher et al. 2006), the amendment of the Chytridiaceae to reported from acidic, peaty, or bog soils, we searched for exclude taxa not related to C. hyalinus (Letcher et al. 2005), them by baiting a variety of soil samples and brought them and the recognition of additional clades within the order into pure culture using chytrid-isolation techniques (Barr (James et al. 2006; Letcher et al. 2005). Further changes in the 1987). Stock cultures were maintained on nutrient agar slants Chytridiomycota include the elevation of the Blastocladiales in screw-topped culture tubes at 5 C and transferred every (James et al. 2006) and the Neocallimastigales (Hibbett et al. three months. 2007) to phylum level and the Monoblepharidales to class level We first isolated strains on PmTG (1 g lÀ1 peptonized milk, (Hibbett et al. 2007). 1glÀ1 tryptone, 5 g lÀ1 glucose, 10 g lÀ1 agar) nutrient agar We cultured the type isolate of C. angularis, two C. pocula- (Barr 1986). In an attempt to optimise growth of the isolates tus isolates, and six morphologically similar chytrids. We we compared growth in liquid medium without glucose compared their morphology by LM and, when possible, zoo- (PmT) or with glucose substituted with 5 g lÀ1 cellobiose or spore ultrastructure, and determined their phylogenetic rela- 5glÀ1 keratin. The PmT medium, with no added carbohydrate tionships based on analyses of the rDNA operon. C. angularis beyond that present in the peptonised milk and tryptone, pro- and C. poculatus are monophyletic as hypothesised from their vided the best growth conditions for all isolates except C. morphology, and we place them in a new genus. Our addi- angularis. Subsequently, we used PmT nutrient agar or broth tional taxon sampling provided strong molecular support for isolation and growth of all clade members except C. angu- for a clade that contains these two species plus others. We laris, which did not grow on PmT. To determine maximum describe the ‘C. angularis clade’ (James et al. 2006) as a new temperature for growth, we incubated duplicates of all iso- order, the Lobulomycetales, and name one family and three lates in 75 ml liquid medium in 125 ml flasks at 17, 20, 25, 30, genera. and 35 C for two weeks in the dark. Table 1 – Culture designations, identities, origins, habitats, and rDNA accession numbers of Lobulomycetales isolates Culture no. New taxon Origin Habitat GenBank accession no. Identification nuSSU nuLSU ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 AF011 Undescribed Peru Alpine barren soil EF432819 EF432819 EF432819 AF017 Undescribed Peru Alpine barren soil EF432821 EF432821 EF432821 AF021a,b Maunachytrium keaense Hawaii, USA Alpine barren soil EF432822 EF432822 EF432822 JEL45 Lobulomyces angularis Maine, USA Sphagnum from acidic lake AF164253 DQ273815 AY997036 JEL178a Undescribed Maine, USA Spring under mixed EF443136 EF443141 EU352772 hard woods JEL343 Lobulomyces poculatus Maine, USA Soil under pine trees EF443134 EF443139 EU352770 JEL369a,b Clydaea vesicula California, USA Soil under Eucalyptus trees EF443137 EF443142 EU352773 JEL374 Lobulomyces poculatus New Zealand Tree canopy detritus EF443135 EF443140 EU352771 PL70 Clydaea vesicula Utah, USA Creek bank EF443138 EF443143 EU352774 CCW64c Environmental PCR Massachusetts, USA Salt marsh AY180029 Chy Pyl IR 14d Chytridium polysiphoniae Shetland, UK Marine AY032608 RSC-CHU-18e Environmental PCR North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhizosphere of Zea mays AJ506000 Germany RSC-CHU-20e Environmental PCR North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhizosphere of Zea mays AJ506002 Germany RSC-CHU-23e Environmental PCR North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhizosphere of Zea mays AJ506003 Germany RSC-CHU-69e Environmental PCR North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhizosphere of Zea mays AJ506037 Germany GenBank accession numbers for species in other orders are published in James et al. (2006). a Taxa examined using LM. b Taxa examined using TEM. c Stoeck & Epstein 2003. d Ku¨ pper et al. 2006. e C. Hussels unpubl. 452 D. R. Simmons et al. Fig 1 – Single most parsimonious tree obtained from combined nuSSU and partial nuLSU rDNA sequences. Numbers to the left of the slash indicate support above 70 % in 10K replicates with parsimony analysis. Numbers to the right of the slash are Bayesian inference estimates of PPs. MP phylogeny tree length [ 2877 steps, CI [ 0.7188, RI [ 0.6902. Species of the Monoblepharidomycetes were used as outgroup taxa. Morphology and zoospore ultrastructure and LR5 and sequenced using NS1, NS2, NS4, NS6, NS7, NS8, ITS4, LR0R, and LR5 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990; White et al. 1990). We grew isolates on agar medium incubated at 17 C in the dark Our PCR products were purified with exonuclease I and to determine morphological stages using LM. During develop- shrimp alkaline phosphatase using
Recommended publications
  • For Review Only 377 Algomyces Stechlinensis Clustered Together with Environmental Clones from a Eutrophic 378 Lake in France (Jobard Et Al
    Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology Page 18 of 43 1 Running head: Parasitic chytrids of volvocacean algae. 2 3 Title: Diversity and Hidden Host Specificity of Chytrids infecting Colonial 4 Volvocacean Algae. 5 Authors: Silke Van den Wyngaerta, Keilor Rojas-Jimeneza,b, Kensuke Setoc, Maiko Kagamic, 6 Hans-Peter Grossarta,d 7 a Department of ExperimentalFor Limnology, Review Leibniz-Institute Only of Freshwater Ecology and Inland 8 Fisheries, Alte Fischerhuette 2, D-16775 Stechlin, Germany 9 b Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, Campus San Pedro, Apdo. 10138-1000, San Jose, Costa Rica 10 c Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Toho University, Funabashi, Chiba, 11 Japan 12 d Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, Potsdam University, Maulbeerallee 2, 14476 Potsdam, 13 Germany 14 15 Corresponding Author: 16 Silke Van den Wyngaert, Department of Experimental Limnology, Leibniz-Institute of 17 Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Alte Fischerhuette 2, D-16775 Stechlin, Germany 18 Telephone number: +49 33082 69972; Fax number: +49 33082 69917; e-mail: [email protected], 19 [email protected] 20 21 22 23 1 Page 19 of 43 Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 24 ABSTRACT 25 Chytrids are zoosporic fungi that play an important, but yet understudied, ecological role in 26 aquatic ecosystems. Many chytrid species have been morphologically described as parasites on 27 phytoplankton. However, the majority of them have rarely been isolated and lack DNA sequence 28 data. In this study we isolated and cultivated three parasitic chytrids, infecting a common 29 volvocacean host species, Yamagishiella unicocca. In order to identify the chytrids, we 30 characterized morphology and life cycle, and analyzed phylogenetic relationships based on 18S 31 and 28S rDNA genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Assessment of Non-Cultured Aquatic Fungal Diversity from Differenthabitats in Mexico
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Valderrama, Brenda; Paredes-Valdez, Guadalupe; Rodríguez, Rocío; Romero-Guido, Cynthia; Martínez, Fernando; Martínez-Romero, Julio; Guerrero-Galván, Saúl; Mendoza- Herrera, Alberto; Folch-Mallol, Jorge Luis Assessment of non-cultured aquatic fungal diversity from differenthabitats in Mexico Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 87, núm. 1, marzo, 2016, pp. 18-28 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42546734003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87 (2016) 18–28 www.ib.unam.mx/revista/ Taxonomy and systematics Assessment of non-cultured aquatic fungal diversity from different habitats in Mexico Estimación de la diversidad de hongos acuáticos no-cultivables de diferentes hábitats en México a a b b Brenda Valderrama , Guadalupe Paredes-Valdez , Rocío Rodríguez , Cynthia Romero-Guido , b c d Fernando Martínez , Julio Martínez-Romero , Saúl Guerrero-Galván , e b,∗ Alberto Mendoza-Herrera , Jorge Luis Folch-Mallol a Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 2001, Col. Chamilpa, 62210 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico b Centro de Investigación en Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Avenida Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa, 62209 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico c Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad s/n, Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Entomopathogens Fungi: Which Groups Conquered
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/003756; this version posted April 4, 2014. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Diversity of entomopathogens Fungi: Which groups conquered the insect body? João P. M. Araújoa & David P. Hughesb aDepartment of Biology, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America. bDepartment of Entomology and Department of Biology, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America. [email protected]; [email protected]; Abstract The entomopathogenic Fungi comprise a wide range of ecologically diverse species. This group of parasites can be found distributed among all fungal phyla and as well as among the ecologically similar but phylogenetically distinct Oomycetes or water molds, that belong to a different kingdom (Stramenopila). As a group, the entomopathogenic fungi and water molds parasitize a wide range of insect hosts from aquatic larvae in streams to adult insects of high canopy tropical forests. Their hosts are spread among 18 orders of insects, in all developmental stages such as: eggs, larvae, pupae, nymphs and adults exhibiting completely different ecologies. Such assortment of niches has resulted in these parasites evolving a considerable morphological diversity, resulting in enormous biodiversity, much of which remains unknown. Here we gather together a huge amount of records of these entomopathogens to comparing and describe both their morphologies and ecological traits. These findings highlight a wide range of adaptations that evolved following the evolutionary transition to infecting the most diverse and widespread animals on Earth, the insects.
    [Show full text]
  • S41467-021-25308-W.Pdf
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25308-w OPEN Phylogenomics of a new fungal phylum reveals multiple waves of reductive evolution across Holomycota ✉ ✉ Luis Javier Galindo 1 , Purificación López-García 1, Guifré Torruella1, Sergey Karpov2,3 & David Moreira 1 Compared to multicellular fungi and unicellular yeasts, unicellular fungi with free-living fla- gellated stages (zoospores) remain poorly known and their phylogenetic position is often 1234567890():,; unresolved. Recently, rRNA gene phylogenetic analyses of two atypical parasitic fungi with amoeboid zoospores and long kinetosomes, the sanchytrids Amoeboradix gromovi and San- chytrium tribonematis, showed that they formed a monophyletic group without close affinity with known fungal clades. Here, we sequence single-cell genomes for both species to assess their phylogenetic position and evolution. Phylogenomic analyses using different protein datasets and a comprehensive taxon sampling result in an almost fully-resolved fungal tree, with Chytridiomycota as sister to all other fungi, and sanchytrids forming a well-supported, fast-evolving clade sister to Blastocladiomycota. Comparative genomic analyses across fungi and their allies (Holomycota) reveal an atypically reduced metabolic repertoire for sanchy- trids. We infer three main independent flagellum losses from the distribution of over 60 flagellum-specific proteins across Holomycota. Based on sanchytrids’ phylogenetic position and unique traits, we propose the designation of a novel phylum, Sanchytriomycota. In addition, our results indicate that most of the hyphal morphogenesis gene repertoire of multicellular fungi had already evolved in early holomycotan lineages. 1 Ecologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Orsay, France. 2 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. ✉ Petersburg, Russia. 3 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungi: Identification
    CHAPTER V- 1 Fungi: Identification RICHARD A. HUMBER USDA-ARS Plant Protection Research Unit, US Plant, Soil & Nutrition Laboratory, Tower Road, Ithaca, New York 14853-2901, USA a detailed guide to the diagnostic characters of many 1 INTRODUCTION important fungal entomopathogens. This chapter also discusses the preparation of Most scientists who find and try to identify ento- mounts for microscopic examination. Similar points mopathogenic fungi have little mycological back- are covered in other chapters, but good slide mounts ground. This chapter presents the basic skills and and simple issues of microscopy are indispensable information needed to allow non-mycologists to skills for facilitating the observation of key taxo- identify the major genera and, in some instances, nomic characters. Many publications discuss the most common species of fungal entomopathogens to principles of microscopy, but a manual by Smith the genetic or, in many instances, to the specific level (1994) is easy to understand and notable for its many with a degree of confidence. micrographs showing the practical effects of the Although many major species of fungal ento- proper and improper use of a light microscope. mopathogens have basic diagnostic characters mak- The recording of images presents a wholly new set ing them quickly identifiable, it must be remembered of options and challenges in increasingly computer- that species such as Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) ized laboratories. Until this century, the only visual Vuill., Metarhizium anisopliae (Sorok.) Metsch, and means to record microscopic observations was with Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) Vi6gas are widely drawings; such artwork, whether rendered freehand agreed to be species complexes whose resolutions or with the aid of a camera lucida, still remains an will depend on correlating molecular, morphologi- important means of illustrating many characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological, Molecular, and Ultrastructural Characterization of Rozella Rhizoclosmatii, a New Species in Cryptomycota
    fungal biology 121 (2017) 1e10 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funbio Morphological, molecular, and ultrastructural characterization of Rozella rhizoclosmatii, a new species in Cryptomycota Peter M. LETCHERa,*, Joyce E. LONGCOREb, C. Alisha QUANDTc, Domingos da Silva LEITEd, Timothy Y. JAMESc, Martha J. POWELLa aDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA bSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA cDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA dDepartamento de Genetica, Evoluc¸ao~ e Bioagentes, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13082-862, Brazil article info abstract Article history: Rozella is a genus of unwalled endoparasites of a variety of hosts including Oomycota (Stra- Received 10 June 2016 menopiles), Blastocladiomycota and Chytridiomycota (Fungi), and one green alga (Coleo- Received in revised form chaete, Chlorophyceae). It currently includes more than 20 formally described species, 15 August 2016 and no new species of Rozella have been described since 1987. We discovered a new Rozella Accepted 19 August 2016 species parasitizing Rhizoclosmatium globosum (Chytridiales, Chytridiomycota) and investi- Available online 4 September 2016 gated its morphology, ultrastructure, and phylogenetic position. Herein named as Rozella Corresponding Editor: rhizoclosmatii sp. nov., the organism induces hypertrophy of the host. Its zoospore is ultra- Gordon William Beakes structurally similar to that of Rozella allomycis, although it has a unique zoospore ultrastruc- tural feature, a lattice of perpendicular rods about the nucleus. The 18S rDNA molecular Keywords: sequence of R. rhizoclosmatii is similar to that of the previously sequenced ‘Rozella ex Rhizo- Lattice closmatium’. This is the first study to inclusively characterize a new species of Rozella with Morphology morphological, ultrastructural and molecular data.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversité Phylogénétique Et Fonctionnelle Des Eumycètes Dans Les Écosystèmes Pélagiques Marlène Jobard-Portas
    Diversité phylogénétique et fonctionnelle des Eumycètes dans les écosystèmes pélagiques Marlène Jobard-Portas To cite this version: Marlène Jobard-Portas. Diversité phylogénétique et fonctionnelle des Eumycètes dans les écosystèmes pélagiques. Sciences agricoles. Université Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand II, 2010. Français. NNT : 2010CLF22090. tel-00769938 HAL Id: tel-00769938 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00769938 Submitted on 4 Jan 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE BLAISE PASCAL Année 2010 N°D.U. 2090 ECOLE DOCTORALE DES SCIENCES DE LA VIE, SANTE, AGRONOMIE, ENVIRONNEMENT N° d’ordre 535 Thèse Présentée à l’Université Blaise Pascal pour l’obtention du grade de DOCTEUR D’UNIVERSITE (Spécialité : Ecologie Microbienne) Soutenue le 14 Décembre 2010 Marlène JOBARD Diversité phylogénétique et fonctionnelle des Eumycètes dans les écosystèmes pélagiques Président : Pr Gilles Bourdier, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Fd, France Invité Institutionnel : Dr Henry-Michel Cauchie, CRP, Belvaux, Luxembourg Directeur de
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Classification Chapter 2
    16 BIOLOGY CHAPTER 2 BIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION 2.1 Kingdom Monera Since the dawn of civilisation, there have been many attempts to classify living organisms. It was done instinctively not using criteria that were 2.2 Kingdom Protista scientific but borne out of a need to use organisms for our own use – for 2.3 Kingdom Fungi food, shelter and clothing. Aristotle was the earliest to attempt a more 2.4 Kingdom Plantae scientific basis for classification. He used simple morphological characters to classify plants into trees, shrubs and herbs. He also divided animals 2.5 Kingdom into two groups, those which had red blood and those that did not. Animalia In Linnaeus' time a Two Kingdom system of classification with 2.6 Viruses, Viroids Plantae and Animalia kingdoms was developed that included all plants and Lichens and animals respectively. This system was used till very recently. This system did not distinguish between the eukaryotes and prokaryotes, unicellular and multicellular organisms and photosynthetic (green algae) and non-photosynthetic (fungi) organisms. Classification of organisms into plants and animals was easily done and was easy to understand, inspite, a large number of organisms did not fall into either category. Hence the two kingdom classification used for a long time was found inadequate. A need was also felt for including, besides gross morphology, other characteristics like cell structure, nature of wall, mode of nutrition, habitat, methods of reproduction, evolutionary relationships, etc. Classification systems for the living organisms have hence, undergone several changes over time. Though plant and animal kingdoms have been a constant under all different systems, the understanding of what groups/organisms be included under these kingdoms have been changing; the number and nature of other kingdoms have also been understood differently by different scientists over time.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. in Whittaker's System of Classification, Prokaryotes Are Placed in the Kingdom (A) Protista (B) Monera (C) Plantae (D) Animal
    1. In Whittaker's system of classification, prokaryotes are placed 12. An organism having cytoplasm i.e. DNA and RNA but no in the kingdom cell wall is (a) Protista (b) Monera (a) Cyanobacterium (b) Mycoplasma (c) Plantae (d) Animalia (c) Bacterium (d) Virus 2. In the five kingdom system of classification, which single 13. Kingdom monera comprises the – kingdom out of the following can include blue-green algae, (a) Plants of economic importance nitrogen fixing bacteria and methanogenic archaebacteria ? (b) All the plants studied in botany (a) Monera (b) Fungi (c) Prokaryotic organisms (c) Plantae (d) Protista (d) Plants of Thallophyta group 3. Which of the following kingdom does not have nuclear 14. The cell wall of green plants is made up of membrane? (a) Pectin (b) Suberin (a) Protista (b) Fungi (c) Cellulose (d) Chitin (c) Monera (d) Plantae 15. Which of the following is not a blue-green algae ? 4. What type of mode of nutrition is found in the kingdom (a) Nostoc (b) Anabaena Animalia? (c) Lichen (d) Aulosiras (a) Autotrophic and heterotrophic 16. During rainy seasons, the ground becomes slippery due to (b) Chemosynthetic and photosynthetic dense growth of (c) Saprophytic and parasitic (a) Lichens (b) Bacteria (d) Holozoic and saprophytic (c) Green algae (d) Cyanobacteria 5. The separation of living beings into five kingdoms is based 17. Paramecium is a on – (a) Protozoan (b) Bacterium (a) Complexity of cell structure (c) Virus (d) Annelid (b) Complexity of organism's body 18. Protists are (c) Mode of obtaining nutrition (a) single-celled eukaryotes (b) multicellular eukaryotes (d) All of the above (c) single-celled prokaryotes (d) single-celled akaryote 6.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2014/029697 Al 27 February 2014 (27.02.2014) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2014/029697 Al 27 February 2014 (27.02.2014) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Common Representative: BASF SE; 67056 Ludwig A01N 25/00 (2006.01) A01N 43/56 (2006.01) shafen (DE). A0 43/40 (2006.01) A0 43/78 (2006.01) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A01N 47/24 (2006.01) A0 45/02 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A01N 43/88 (2006.01) A01P 3/00 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, A0 37/50 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) International Application Number: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/EP20 13/067 148 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, (22) International Filing Date: MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, 16 August 2013 (16.08.2013) OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (25) Filing Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, (26) Publication Language: English ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 1218 13 12.5 22 August 2012 (22.08.2012) EP kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant: BASF SE [DE/DE]; 67056 Ludwigshafen GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, (DE).
    [Show full text]
  • A Higher-Level Phylogenetic Classification of the Fungi
    mycological research 111 (2007) 509–547 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi David S. HIBBETTa,*, Manfred BINDERa, Joseph F. BISCHOFFb, Meredith BLACKWELLc, Paul F. CANNONd, Ove E. ERIKSSONe, Sabine HUHNDORFf, Timothy JAMESg, Paul M. KIRKd, Robert LU¨ CKINGf, H. THORSTEN LUMBSCHf, Franc¸ois LUTZONIg, P. Brandon MATHENYa, David J. MCLAUGHLINh, Martha J. POWELLi, Scott REDHEAD j, Conrad L. SCHOCHk, Joseph W. SPATAFORAk, Joost A. STALPERSl, Rytas VILGALYSg, M. Catherine AIMEm, Andre´ APTROOTn, Robert BAUERo, Dominik BEGEROWp, Gerald L. BENNYq, Lisa A. CASTLEBURYm, Pedro W. CROUSl, Yu-Cheng DAIr, Walter GAMSl, David M. GEISERs, Gareth W. GRIFFITHt,Ce´cile GUEIDANg, David L. HAWKSWORTHu, Geir HESTMARKv, Kentaro HOSAKAw, Richard A. HUMBERx, Kevin D. HYDEy, Joseph E. IRONSIDEt, Urmas KO˜ LJALGz, Cletus P. KURTZMANaa, Karl-Henrik LARSSONab, Robert LICHTWARDTac, Joyce LONGCOREad, Jolanta MIA˛ DLIKOWSKAg, Andrew MILLERae, Jean-Marc MONCALVOaf, Sharon MOZLEY-STANDRIDGEag, Franz OBERWINKLERo, Erast PARMASTOah, Vale´rie REEBg, Jack D. ROGERSai, Claude ROUXaj, Leif RYVARDENak, Jose´ Paulo SAMPAIOal, Arthur SCHU¨ ßLERam, Junta SUGIYAMAan, R. Greg THORNao, Leif TIBELLap, Wendy A. UNTEREINERaq, Christopher WALKERar, Zheng WANGa, Alex WEIRas, Michael WEISSo, Merlin M. WHITEat, Katarina WINKAe, Yi-Jian YAOau, Ning ZHANGav aBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA bNational Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information,
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Phyla
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Sydowia Jahr/Year: 1984 Band/Volume: 37 Autor(en)/Author(s): Arx Josef Adolf, von Artikel/Article: Fungal phyla. 1-5 ©Verlag Ferdinand Berger & Söhne Ges.m.b.H., Horn, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Fungal phyla J. A. von ARX Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, P. O. B. 273, NL-3740 AG Baarn, The Netherlands 40 years ago I learned from my teacher E. GÄUMANN at Zürich, that the fungi represent a monophyletic group of plants which have algal ancestors. The Myxomycetes were excluded from the fungi and grouped with the amoebae. GÄUMANN (1964) and KREISEL (1969) excluded the Oomycetes from the Mycota and connected them with the golden and brown algae. One of the first taxonomist to consider the fungi to represent several phyla (divisions with unknown ancestors) was WHITTAKER (1969). He distinguished phyla such as Myxomycota, Chytridiomycota, Zygomy- cota, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. He also connected the Oomycota with the Pyrrophyta — Chrysophyta —• Phaeophyta. The classification proposed by WHITTAKER in the meanwhile is accepted, e. g. by MÜLLER & LOEFFLER (1982) in the newest edition of their text-book "Mykologie". The oldest fungal preparation I have seen came from fossil plant material from the Carboniferous Period and was about 300 million years old. The structures could not be identified, and may have been an ascomycete or a basidiomycete. It must have been a parasite, because some deformations had been caused, and it may have been an ancestor of Taphrina (Ascomycota) or of Milesina (Uredinales, Basidiomycota).
    [Show full text]