A Morphological Study of the Venom Apparatus of the Spider Allopecosa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Morphological Study of the Venom Apparatus of the Spider Allopecosa TurkJBiol 28(2004)79-83 ©TÜB‹TAK AMorphologicalStudyoftheVenomApparatusofthespider Allopecosafabilis (Araneae,Lycosidae) Külti¤inÇAVUfiO⁄LU,MeltemMARAfi,AbdullahBAYRAM DepartmentofBiology,FacultyofArtandScience,K›r›kkaleUniversity,71450,Yahflihan,K›r›kkale-TURKEY Received:24.05.2004 Abstract: ThemorphologicalstructureofthevenomapparatusofAllopecosafabrilis wasstudiedusingscanningelectronmicroscopy (SEM).Thevenomapparatusissituatedintheprosomaandiscomposedofapairofcheliceraeandvenomglands.Eachchelicera consistsof2parts,astoutbasalpartcoveredbyhair,andamovablefang.Avenomporeissituatedonthesubterminalparto fthe fang.Justbelowthefang,thereisacheliceralgroovenexttotheteeth.Eachsideofthegrooveiscoveredwithcuticular teeth. Thevenomglandsarelargeandroughlycylindrical.Eachglandissurroundedbycompletelystriatedmuscularfibers.Thevenom producedinthevenomglandsbycontractionofthesemuscularfibersisejectedintothefangthroughacanalandthevenompo re. KeyWords: Venomgland,chelicerae,scanningelectronmicroscope, Allopecosafabrilis,venom Allopecosafabrilis (Aranea,Lycosidae)Örümce¤inin ZehirAyg›t›ÜzerineMorfolojikBirÇal›flma Özet: Buçal›flmada,Allopecosafabrilis’inzehirayg›t›n›nmorfolojikyap›s›taramal›elektronmikroskobukullan›larak(SEM)incelendi. Zehirayg›t›prosomadayerleflmiflolup,birçiftkeliservezehirbezlerindenibarettir.Herbirkeliser,k›llarlakapl›kal›nbirbazalk›s›m vehareketlibirzehirdifliolmaküzereikik›s›mdanoluflur.Zehirdiflininaltk›sm›ndabirzehiraç›kl›¤›yeral›r.Zehirdifl ininhemen alt›nda,keliserdifllerineyak›nbirkeliseralbofllukbulunmaktad›r.Bofllu¤unherbirkenar›kutikulardifllerleçevrilidir.Zeh irbezleri büyükveflekilbak›m›ndansilindiriktir.Herbirbez,tamamençizgilikaslifleriileçevrelenmifltir.Bukasliflerininkas›lma s›ylazehir bezlerindeüretilenzehir,birkanalvezehiraç›kl›¤›vas›tas›ylazehirdiflineboflalmaktad›r. AnahtarSözcükler: Zehirbezi,keliser,taramal›elektronmikroskop, Allopecosafabrilis,zehir. Introduction situatedintheanteriorportionoftheprosoma.Thesize Thespidersarethelargestgroupofvenomous andshapeofthevenomglandsaredifferentinvarious animals,representedbymorethan38,000species speciesofspiders.Thevenomglandsof Loxosceles throughouttheworld.Thirtyspiderspeciesareknownto intermedia,Loxoscelesreclusa,Heteropodavenatoria, beharmfultohumans(1,2). Lycosanarbonensis,Lampanacylindrata and Agelena limbata speciesareintheprosoma(10,12),whilethose Manyspidersaresynanthropic.Thus,human-spider ofHognatarantula andPlesiophirctuscollinus speciesare encountersarenotinfrequentandbitesoccasionallyoccur inthechelicerae(8,13,14). (3,4).Forexample,ahighnumberofbitingeventsare observedinhumanpopulationsathighratesby Inthespiderembryo,thecheliceraeliebehindthe Phoneutrianigriventer becausethosespidersinfest mouthopening.Theyarelocatedintheanteriorportion clothingandshoes(5,7).Investigationsofspiders’ oftheprosomaatthenextgrowingperiod(2).Each venomsandvenomapparatushaveincreasedrecently cheliceraconsistsof2parts,astoutbasalpartanda (2,8,9). movablevenomfang(15).Therearematuremusclesin thebasalpartandvenomglandsinsomespecies.These Thevenomapparatusissituatedintheprosomaof musclesareinvolvedinmovingthefang.Ingeneral,the spidersandconsistsofapairofvenomglandsand fangrestsinagrooveofthebasalsegmentliketheblade chelicerae.Venomisproducedinapairofvenomglands 79 AMorphologicalStudyoftheVenomApparatusoftheSpider Allopecosafabilis (Araneae,Lycosidae) ofapocketknife.Whenthespiderbites,thevenomfang movesoutofthegrooveandpenetratestheprey.Atthe sametime,thevenomisinjectedintothepreyfroma tinyopeningatthetipofthevenomfang.Bothsidesof thecheliceragroovehavecuticularteeth.Spiderswith teethinthegroovemashtheirprey.Thosewithoutteeth canonlysuckouttheirvictimsthroughthesmallbite holes(2).Thenumberandsizeofcheliceralteethare veryimportantdiagnosticcharacteristicsfortaxonomists. Spidersusetheircheliceraefordefense,seizingprey, Figure1.Thegeneralappearanceofvenomgland(vg). carryingeggcocoons,makingnoiseanddigging(2,15). Spidervenomisobtainedforuseinmedicaltreatmentof lengthoftheglandswas1.38mmandthewidthwas suchdiseasesascardiacdisturbanceandforproducing 490µm(Figure2).Theoutersurfacesoftheglandsare newantibacterialreagents(16,17).Theaimofthisstudy surroundedbynumerousspirallyarrangedstriate wastoinvestigate,themorphologicalstructureofthe muscularfibers(Figure3). venomapparatusofAllopecosafabrilis. MaterialsandMethods Twentyspecimensof Allopecosafabrilis (18)were collectedfromthetownofYahflihannearK›r›kkalein July.Thespiderswereanesthetizedwithetherandtheir venomglandsintheprosomaweredissectedundera stereomicroscope(NikonSMZ10A).Thevenomglands andcheliceraewerewashedwith0.2Msodium phosphatebuffer.Thevenomglandswerefixedin3% Figure2.Theappearanceofdiameterandlengthofvenomgland. gluteraldehydebufferat4°Cfor2h.Afterrinsingin sodiumphosphatebuffer(pH7.2)3timesfor10min, theywerefixedin1%osmiumtetroxidewiththesame bufferat4°C.Sampleswereleftinsodiumphosphate buffertoremoveosmiumtetroxide,andthenwere dehydratedinthefollowingalcoholseriesfor10min; 50%,60%,70%,80%,90%,95%and99%.After dehydration,thesamplesweretransferredtopetridishes anddriedonair.Driedsampleswereplacedonstubs, thencoatedwithgoldusingaPolaron500sputtercoater andexaminedusingascanningelectronmicroscope Figure3. Theappearanceofnumerousstriatedmuscularfibers(m) (19,21). surroundingvenomgland. Eachchelicerawasobservedtohave2parts,astout Results basalpartandamovablevenomfang(Figure4).The basalpartiscoveredbylonghairs.Eachfangisobserved Inourstudies,thevenomapparatusof Allopecosa tositinagrooveatthebaseofthechelicera.Outsidethis fabrilis consistsofapairofvenomglandsintheprosoma groove,justbelowthevenomfang,cheliceraeteethare (Figure1).In Allopecosafabrilis,thevenomglandsare reciprocallyarranged(Figure5).Theseteethareusedfor cylindrical.Theglandiscomposedofacylindricalstem holdingandcrushingprey.Thereisaporetoreleasethe andacanalconnectedit.Thecanalextendsthroughthe venomproducednearthetipofthevenomfang(Figure outersurfaceofthechelicerae.Theglandswere 6). determinedtobeonelobed(Figure1).Theaverage 80 K.ÇAVUfiO⁄LU,M.MARAfi,A.BAYRAM callinus andHognatarantula (13,22,26)theyareinthe chelicerae.Inthisstudy,thevenomglandof Allopecosa fabrilis speciesissituatedintheprosomaandextends throughtheoutsideofthecheliceraewithapairof canals. Previousstudiesshowedthatthevenomglandsvary inshapeandposition(27).Forexample,inthegenus Atypus theglandsarecomposite,in Filistata theyare multilobularandin Scytodes theyarebilobular Figure4.Theappearanceofbasalpart(bp)andvenomfang(vf). (11,28,29).Thevenomglandsof Loxoscelesreclusa and Loxoscelesintermedia arebulbous;in Heteropoda venatoria,Latrodectusmactans,Lycosaindagastrix they arecylindrical;in Ctnedusmedius theyarepurse-like;in Plesiophirctuscollinus theyarecarrot-like;andinAgelena labyrinthica theyareaubergineinshape(11,30,32).The venomglandsof Allopecosafabrllis haveonelobeasis alsothecaseinLoxoscelesintermedia,Lycosaindagastrix, Heteropodavenatoria,Loxoscelesreclusa,Cuppiennius salai,Dolomedestenebrosus,Agelenalimbata, Latrodectusmactans and Lycosanarbonensis Figure5.Theappearanceofcheliceraeteeth(ct). (11,12,23,25),andtheyarecylindrical. Thesizeofthevenomglandisnotnecessarilyrelated tothesizeofthespider.Forexample,largetheraphosid spidersandtarantulashaveverysmallglands,whereas mostsmalllabidognathspeciespossesscomparatively largeglands(1,2).Inourresearch,although Allopecosa fabrilis hasasmallbody,thesizeofitsvenomglandis ratherlarge. Themovementofthecheliceraediffersbetweenin the2largesubordersLabidognathaandOrthognatha. Thecheliceraearesituatedundertheprosomainthe Labidognathamembers.Thecheliceraeareopposite,like Figure6. Theappearanceofthepore(p)throughwhichvenomis thearmsoftheletterV.IntheOrthognathamembers, released. thecheliceraeareconnectedwiththeanteriorofthe prosomaandthevenomfangslieparalleltoeachother. Discussion Theymoveupanddown(33).Basedonitschelicera movement, Allopecosafabrilis belongstothesuborder Kaston(22)statedthatthevenomglandsofspiders Labidognatha. aregenerallyfoundintheprosoma,andrarelyinthe chelicerae,exceptforthefamiliesUloboridaeand Collatz(34)reportedthatalthoughsomespiders Holarchaidae,whichlackvenomglandsentirely.Inthe havecheliceralteeth,somedonot.Forexample,the species Loxoscelesintermedia,Ctnedusmedius,Lycosa Araneidae,Tetragnatidae,AgelenidaeandAvucularidae indagastrix,Heteropodavenatoria,Loxoscelesreclusa, membershavecheliceraecoveredwithlargeteeth, Cuppienniussalai,Dolomedestenebrosus,Agelena whereastheTheridiidaeandThomisidaemembersdonot limbata,Latrodectusmactans and Lycosanarbonensis haveteeth.Intermsofthesizeoftheteeth, Allopecosa narbonensis (11,12,23,25)itwasreportedthatthe fabrilis issimilartotheAraneidae,Tetragnatidae, venomglandsareintheprosoma,andin Plesiophirctus AgelenidaeandAvicularidaemembers. 81 AMorphologicalStudyoftheVenomApparatusoftheSpider Allopecosafabilis (Araneae,Lycosidae) Studiesshowedthatthenumberofchelicerateeth Correspondingauthor: playsanimportantroleintaxonomy.Forexample,while Külti¤inÇAVUfiO⁄LU thereisonlyonetoothattheposteriorofthechelicera K›r›kkaleUniversity,FacultyofArtandScience, toothgrooveinthefemale Enoplognatha (Theriididae), DepartmentofBiology, thereare6-7largeteethinthe Tapinopa (Linyphiidae) (22).Fourpairsofteetharepresentonthecheliceraeof 71450,Yahflihan,K›r›kkale-TURKEY Allopecosafabrilis inanoppositearrangement.Inthis E-mail:[email protected] study,itwasdeterminedthatthemorphological structureofthevenomapparatusof Allopecosafabrilis resemblesthoseofrelatedspecies,buttherearesome smalldifferences. References 1. Schmidt,H.Giftspinnenaucheinproblemdesferntourismus.Med 16. BodeF,SachF,FranzMR.Tarantulapeptidesinhibitsatrial Wschr115:2237,1973.
Recommended publications
  • The Life Cycle of Heteropoda Venatoria (Linnaeus) (Araneae: Heteropodidae)I, by John Ross 3, David B
    THE LIFE CYCLE OF HETEROPODA VENATORIA (LINNAEUS) (ARANEAE: HETEROPODIDAE)I, BY JOHN ROSS 3, DAVID B. RICHMAN 3, FADEL MANSOUR4, ANNE TRAMBARULO3, AND W. H. WHITCOMB The giant crab spider, Heteropoda venatoria (L.), is known to occur throughout much of the tropics and subtropics of the world where it is valued as a predator of cockroaches (Guthrie and Tindall 1968, Hughes 1977, Edwards 1979). Its feeding habits, like those of most spiders, vary somewhat and it has also been known to eat scorpions and bats (Bhattacharya 1941), although it is questionable as to whether it normally attacks such prey. This spider is often found associated with human habitation, possibly due to the abun- dance of prey (Subrahamanyam 1944, Edwards 1979). Although biological notes on H. venatoria have been published by several workers (Lucas 1871, Minchin 1904, Bristowe 1924, Bonnet 1930, Ori 1974, 1977), the only life history work to date was published by Bonnet (1932) and Sekiguchi (1943, 1944a,b, 1945). Bonnet (1932) based his study on only 12 spiders (of which seven matured) and lacked data on the postembryonic stages. Sekiguchi (1943, 1944a,b, 1945) presented a more nearly complete study, but the papers are difficult to translate and they still lack some data, especially in regard to variation in the number of instars and carapace width. We have raised H. venatoria in the laboratory and present here our data on life cycle of this important beneficial arthropod. MATERIALS AND METHODS Spiders were obtained from avocado groves in south Florida, near Homestead, Dade County. Egg sacs taken from our laboratory This study was partially supported by the United States-lsrael BARD Fund as Research Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in the Knowledge of Brown Spider Toxins
    Chaves-Moreira et al. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases (2017) 23:6 DOI 10.1186/s40409-017-0097-8 REVIEW Open Access Highlights in the knowledge of brown spider toxins Daniele Chaves-Moreira1, Andrea Senff-Ribeiro1, Ana Carolina Martins Wille1,2, Luiza Helena Gremski1, Olga Meiri Chaim1 and Silvio Sanches Veiga1* Abstract Brown spiders are venomous arthropods that use their venom for predation and defense. In humans, bites of these animals provoke injuries including dermonecrosis with gravitational spread of lesions, hematological abnormalities and impaired renal function. The signs and symptoms observed following a brown spider bite are called loxoscelism. Brown spider venom is a complex mixture of toxins enriched in low molecular mass proteins (4–40 kDa). Characterization of the venom confirmed the presence of three highly expressed protein classes: phospholipases D, metalloproteases (astacins) and insecticidal peptides (knottins). Recently, toxins with low levels of expression have also been found in Loxosceles venom, such as serine proteases, protease inhibitors (serpins), hyaluronidases, allergen-like toxins and histamine-releasing factors. The toxin belonging to the phospholipase-D family (also known as the dermonecrotic toxin) is the most studied class of brown spider toxins. This class of toxins single-handedly can induce inflammatory response, dermonecrosis, hemolysis, thrombocytopenia and renal failure. The functional role of the hyaluronidase toxin as a spreading factor in loxoscelism has also been demonstrated. However, the biological characterization of other toxins remains unclear and the mechanism by which Loxosceles toxins exert their noxious effects is yet to be fully elucidated. The aim of this review is to provide an insight into brown spider venom toxins and toxicology, including a description of historical data already available in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analyses of Venoms from American and African Sicarius Spiders That Differ in Sphingomyelinase D Activity
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Toxicon 55 (2010) 1274–1282 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon Comparative analyses of venoms from American and African Sicarius spiders that differ in sphingomyelinase D activity Pamela A. Zobel-Thropp*, Melissa R. Bodner 1, Greta J. Binford Department of Biology, Lewis and Clark College, 0615 SW Palatine Hill Road, Portland, OR 97219, USA article info abstract Article history: Spider venoms are cocktails of toxic proteins and peptides, whose composition varies at Received 27 August 2009 many levels. Understanding patterns of variation in chemistry and bioactivity is funda- Received in revised form 14 January 2010 mental for understanding factors influencing variation. The venom toxin sphingomyeli- Accepted 27 January 2010 nase D (SMase D) in sicariid spider venom (Loxosceles and Sicarius) causes dermonecrotic Available online 8 February 2010 lesions in mammals. Multiple forms of venom-expressed genes with homology to SMase D are expressed in venoms of both genera.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Distribution of Sphingomyelinase D Activity in Venoms of Haplogyne Spiders
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 25–33 The phylogenetic distribution of sphingomyelinase D activity in venoms of Haplogyne spiders Greta J. Binford*, Michael A. Wells Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received 6 October 2002; received in revised form 8 February 2003; accepted 10 February 2003 Abstract The venoms of Loxosceles spiders cause severe dermonecrotic lesions in human tissues. The venom component sphingomyelinase D (SMD) is a contributor to lesion formation and is unknown elsewhere in the animal kingdom. This study reports comparative analyses of SMD activity and venom composition of select Loxosceles species and representatives of closely related Haplogyne genera. The goal was to identify the phylogenetic group of spiders with SMD and infer the timing of evolutionary origin of this toxin. We also preliminarily characterized variation in molecular masses of venom components in the size range of SMD. SMD activity was detected in all (10) Loxosceles species sampled and two species representing their sister taxon, Sicarius, but not in any other venoms or tissues surveyed. Mass spectrometry analyses indicated that all Loxosceles and Sicarius species surveyed had multiple (at least four to six) molecules in the size range corresponding to known SMD proteins (31–35 kDa), whereas other Haplogynes analyzed had no molecules in this mass range in their venom. This suggests SMD originated in the ancestors of the Loxoscelesy Sicarius lineage. These groups of proteins varied in molecular mass across species with North American Loxosceles having 31–32 kDa, African Loxosceles having 32–33.5 kDa and Sicarius having 32–33 kDa molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • ANA CAROLINA MARTINS WILLE.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ ANA CAROLINA MARTINS WILLE AVALIAÇÃO DA ATIVIDADE DE FOSFOLIPASE-D RECOMBINANTE DO VENENO DA ARANHA MARROM (Loxosceles intermedia) SOBRE A PROLIFERAÇÃO, INFLUXO DE CÁLCIO E METABOLISMO DE FOSFOLIPÍDIOS EM CÉLULAS TUMORAIS. CURITIBA 2014 i Wille, Ana Carolina Martins Avaliação da atividade de fosfolipase-D recombinante do veneno da aranha marrom (Loxosceles intermedia) sobre a proliferação, influxo de cálcio e metabolismo de fosfolipídios em células tumorais Curitiba, 2014. 217p. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Federal do Paraná – UFPR 1.veneno de aranha marrom. 2. fosfolipase-D. 3.proliferação celular. 4.metabolismo de lipídios. 5.influxo de cálcio. ANA CAROLINA MARTINS WILLE AVALIAÇÃO DA ATIVIDADE DE FOSFOLIPASE-D RECOMBINANTE DO VENENO DA ARANHA MARROM (Loxosceles intermedia) SOBRE A PROLIFERAÇÃO, INFLUXO DE CÁLCIO E METABOLISMO DE FOSFOLIPÍDIOS EM CÉLULAS TUMORAIS. Tese apresentada como requisito à obtenção do grau de Doutor em Biologia Celular e Molecular, Curso de Pós- Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná. Orientador(a): Dra. Andrea Senff Ribeiro Co-orientador: Dr. Silvio Sanches Veiga CURITIBA 2014 ii O desenvolvimento deste trabalho foi possível devido ao apoio financeiro do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), a Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação Araucária e SETI-PR. iii Dedico este trabalho àquela que antes da sua existência foi o grande sonho que motivou minha vida. Sonho que foi a base para que eu escolhesse uma profissão e um trabalho. À você, minha amada filha GIOVANNA, hoje minha realidade, dedico todo meu trabalho. iv Dedico também este trabalho ao meu amado marido, amigo, professor e co- orientador Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Araneae, Agelenidae, Agelena
    Zootaxa 1021: 45–63 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1021 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) On Agelena labyrinthica (Clerck, 1757) and some allied species, with descriptions of two new species of the genus Agelena from China (Araneae: Agelenidae) ZHI-SHENG ZHANG1,2*, MING-SHENG ZHU1** & DA-XIANG SONG1*** 1. College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, P. R. China; 2. Baoding Teachers College, Baoding, Hebei 071051, P. R. China; *[email protected], **[email protected] (Corresponding author), ***[email protected] Abstract Seven allied species of the funnel-weaver spider genus Agelena Walckenaer, 1805, including the type species Agelena labyrinthica (Clerck, 1757), known to occur in Asia and Europe, are reviewed on the basis of the similarity of genital structures. Two new species are described: Agelena chayu sp. nov. and Agelena cuspidata sp. nov. The specific name A. silvatica Oliger, 1983 is revalidated. The female is newly described for A. injuria Fox, 1936. Two specific names are newly synony- mized: Agelena daoxianensis Peng, Gong et Kim, 1996 with A. silvatica Oliger, 1983, and A. sub- limbata Wang, 1991 with A. limbata Thorell, 1897. Some names are proposed for these species to represent some particular genital structures: conductor ventral apophysis, conductor median apo- physis, conductor distal apophysis and conductor dorsal apophysis for male palp and spermathecal head, spermathecal stalk, spermathecal base and spermathecal apophysis for female epigynum. Key words: genital structure, revalidation, synonym, review, taxonomy Introduction The funnel-weaver spider genus Agelena was erected by Walckenaer (1805) with the type species Araneus labyrinthicus Clerck, 1757.
    [Show full text]
  • Sphingomyelinase D Activity in Sicarius Tropicus Venom:Toxic
    toxins Article Sphingomyelinase D Activity in Sicarius tropicus Venom: Toxic Potential and Clues to the Evolution of SMases D in the Sicariidae Family Priscila Hess Lopes 1, Caroline Sayuri Fukushima 2,3 , Rosana Shoji 1, Rogério Bertani 2 and Denise V. Tambourgi 1,* 1 Immunochemistry Laboratory, Butantan Institute, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil; [email protected] (P.H.L.); [email protected] (R.S.) 2 Special Laboratory of Ecology and Evolution, Butantan Institute, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil; [email protected] (C.S.F.); [email protected] (R.B.) 3 Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The spider family Sicariidae includes three genera, Hexophthalma, Sicarius and Loxosceles. The three genera share a common characteristic in their venoms: the presence of Sphingomyelinases D (SMase D). SMases D are considered the toxins that cause the main pathological effects of the Loxosceles venom, that is, those responsible for the development of loxoscelism. Some studies have shown that Sicarius spiders have less or undetectable SMase D activity in their venoms, when compared to Hexophthalma. In contrast, our group has shown that Sicarius ornatus, a Brazilian species, has active SMase D and toxic potential to envenomation. However, few species of Sicarius have been characterized for their toxic potential. In order to contribute to a better understanding about the toxicity of Sicarius venoms, the aim of this study was to characterize the toxic properties of male and female venoms from Sicarius tropicus and compare them with that from Loxosceles laeta, one Citation: Lopes, P.H.; Fukushima, of the most toxic Loxosceles venoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mai Po Nature Reserve Management Plan: 2019-2024
    Mai Po Nature Reserve Management Plan: 2019-2024 ©Anthony Sun June 2021 (Mid-term version) Prepared by WWF-Hong Kong Mai Po Nature Reserve Management Plan: 2019-2024 Page | 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Regional and Global Context ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Local Biodiversity and Wise Use ................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Geology and Geological History ................................................................................................................. 10 1.4 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Climate ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.6 Climate Change Impacts ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.7 Biodiversity ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 Arachnids As
    CHAPTER THIRTEEN ARACHNIDS 13.1 The arachnid fauna of south central Seram As with insects, only a very few specimens compared with the total number of known species were collected in the field. Nevertheless, they do cover most species commonly encountered and named by the Nuaulu. A checklist of arachnid specimens recorded in the Nuaulu area during field- work is presented in table 22. 13.2 Nuaulu categories applied to arachnids excepting Acarida 13.2.1 kanopone Scorpions (SCORPIONIDA) and possibly also whip-scorpions ( URO- PYGI ). 13.2.2 riko-riko, nau asue The first term is consistently applied to harvestmen ( PHALANGIDA ). In the second, nau is a general term for augury and divination; asu = 'dog', asu- = 'cheek' + non-human possessive pronominal suffix. Nau asue is applied to the harvestman Altobunus formosus. It is probably a synonym for riko-riko, being used as a nick-name in circumstances in which it seems auspicious. 13.2.3 kahuneke hatu nohu inae Hatu nohu(e), meaning 'cavernous rock outcrop, cave', indicates the habitat of this spider; inae = 'mother'. As kahunekete is the generic term for spider we thus have 'mother cave spider'. Applied quite specifically to tailess whip scorpions, and generally encountered in rock fissures when hunting bats. 13.2.4 kahuneke ai ukune Ai ukune = 'treetop', far forest. Applied to various kinds of long- bodied spider, including Theridion and possibly Nephilia. It therefore seems to be applied to both hunters and spinners of irregular webs in forest habi- tats. - 201 - 13.2.5 kahuneke titie Titie = 'hot', so-called on account of the ability of this round-bodied spider to bite humans and cause a painful swelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnides 76
    Arachnides, 2015, n°76 ARACHNIDES BULLETIN DE TERRARIOPHILIE ET DE RECHERCHES DE L’A.P.C.I. (Association Pour la Connaissance des Invertébrés) 76 2015 0 Arachnides, 2015, n°76 LES PREDATEURS DES SCORPIONS (ARACHNIDA : SCORPIONES) G. DUPRE Dans leur revue sur les prédateurs de scorpions, Polis, Sissom & Mac Cormick (1981) relèvent 150 espèces dont essentiellement des espèces adaptées au comportement nocturne de leur proie (chouettes, rongeurs, carnivores nocturnes) mais également des espèces diurnes (lézards, rongeurs, carnivores....) qui débusquent les scorpions sous les pierres ou dans leurs terriers. Dans une précédente note (Dupré, 2008) nous avions effectué un relevé afin d'actualiser cette étude de 1981. Sept ans après, de nouvelles données sont présentées dans cette synthèse. Voici un nouveau relevé des espèces prédatrices. Nous ne faisons pas mention des scorpions qui feront l'objet d'un futur article traité avec le cannibalisme. Explication des tableaux: La première colonne correspond aux prédateurs, la seconde aux régions concernées et la troisième aux références. Dans la mesure du possible, les noms scientifiques ont été rectifiés en fonction des synonymies ou des nouvelles combinaisons appliquées depuis les dates de publication d'origine. ARTHROPODA ARACHNIDA SOLIFUGAE Solifugae Afrique du Nord Millot & Vachon, 1949; Punzo, 1998; Cloudsley-Thompson, 1977 Eremobates sp. USA Bradley, 1983 ARACHNIDA ARANEAE Acanthoscurria atrox Brésil Lourenço, 1981 Aphonopelma sp. et autres Amérique centrale Mazzotti, 1964 Teraphosidae Phormictopus auratus Cuba Teruel & De Armas, 2012 Brachypelma vagans Mexique Dor et al., 2011 Epicadus heterogaster Brésil Lourenço et al. 2006 Latrodectus sp. USA Baerg, 1961 L. hesperus USA Polis et al., 1981 L. mactans Cuba Teruel, 1996; Teruel & De Armas, 2012 L.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Recluse Spider, Loxosceles Reclusa Gertsch & Mulaik (Arachnida: Araneae: Sicariidae)1 G
    EENY299 Brown Recluse Spider, Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch & Mulaik (Arachnida: Araneae: Sicariidae)1 G. B. Edwards2 Introduction I called the Florida Poison Control Network to confirm these numbers, and was cited 182 total cases and 96 in the The brown recluse spider, Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch & Tampa region. The actual numbers are less important than Mulaik, is frequently reported in Florida as a cause of the fact that a significant number of unconfirmed brown necrotic lesions in humans. For example, in the year 2000 recluse spider bites are reported in the state every year. Yet alone, Loft (2001) reported that the Florida Poison Control not one specimen of brown recluse spider has ever been Network had recorded nearly 300 alleged cases of brown collected in Tampa, and the only records of Loxosceles recluse bites in the state; a subset of 95 of these bites was species in the entire region are from Orlando and vicinity. reported in the 21 counties (essentially Central Florida) A general review of the brown recluse, along with a critical under the jurisdiction of the regional poison control center examination of the known distribution of brown recluse in Tampa. and related spiders in Florida, seems in order at this time. Distribution Loxosceles reclusa was described by Gertsch and Mulaik (1940) from Texas. At the time of the first revision of the genus Loxosceles in the Americas (Gertsch 1958), the known distribution ranged from Central Texas to southern Kansas, east through middle Missouri to western Tennessee and northern Alabama, and south to southern Mississippi. Gorham (1968) added Illinois, Kentucky, and northern Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CHECKLIST of ILLINOIS SPIDERS Over 500 Spider Species Have Been
    1 CHECKLIST OF ILLINOIS SPIDERS Over 500 spider species have been reported to occur in Illinois. This checklist includes 558 species, and there may be records in the literature that have eluded the author’s attention. This checklist of Illinois species has been compiled from sources cited below. The initials in parentheses that follow each species name and authorship in the list denote the paper or other source in which the species was reported. Locality data, dates of collection, and other information about each species can be obtained by referring to the indicated sources. (AAS) American Arachnological Society Spider Species List for North America, published on the web site of the American Arachnological Society: http://americanarachnology.org/AAS_information.html (B&N) Beatty, J. A. and J. M. Nelson. 1979. Additions to the Checklist of Illinois Spiders. The Great Lakes Entomologist 12:49-56. (JB) Beatty, J. A. 2002. The Spiders of Illinois and Indiana, their Geolographical Affinities, and an Annotated Checklist. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 1:77-94. (BC) Cutler, B. 1987. A Revision of the American Species of the Antlike Jumping Spider Genus Synageles (Araneae: Salticidae). J. Arachnol.15:321-348. (G&P) Gertsch, W. J. And N. I. Platnick. 1980. A Revision of the American Spiders of the Family Atypidae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae). Amer. Mus. Novitates 2704:1-39. (BK) Kaston, B. J. 1955. Check List of Illinois Spiders. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 47: 165- 172. (SK) Kendeigh, S. C. 1979. Invertebrate Populations of the Deciduous Forest Fluctuations and Relations to Weather. Illinois Biol. Monog. 50:1-107.
    [Show full text]