Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 65/Friday, April 4, 2003/Notices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 65/Friday, April 4, 2003/Notices 16548 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 65 / Friday, April 4, 2003 / Notices The segregative effect associated with Statement, but was included and the National Park Service (NPS) the application terminated March 19, analyzed, along with 4 additional acquiring the land on which the lake 2000, in accordance with the notice alternatives, in the Final Supplemental sits. The lake was built by Sifford to published as FR Doc. 00–3267 in the Environmental Impact Statement. The provide scenic benefits and recreational Federal Register (65 FR 7057–8) dated full range of foreseeable environmental opportunities to guests at the nearby February 11, 2000. consequences was assessed, and Drakesbad Guest Ranch, which Sifford Dated: January 21, 2003. appropriate mitigating measures were owned. Drakesbad Guest Ranch is over Howard A. Lemm, identified. 100 years old and is still in operation to The Record of Decision includes a this day. It is owned by the National Acting Deputy State Director, Division of statement of the decision made, Resources. Park Service and is located within the synopses of other alternatives boundaries of Lassen Volcanic National [FR Doc. 03–8170 Filed 4–3–03; 8:45 am] considered, the basis for the decision, a Park. Drakesbad is operated by the BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P description of the environmentally Park’s concessioner, California Guest preferable alternative, a finding Services. Drakesbad, with nearby Dream DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR regarding impairment of park resources Lake, is a popular destination and has and values, a listing of measures to been visited by many generations of National Park Service minimize environmental harm, an families. Dream Lake is a contributing overview of public involvement in the feature to the cultural landscape of Notice of Availability of a Record of decision-making process, and a Drakesbad Guest Ranch, which has been Decision (ROD) on the Final Statement of Findings. nominated for placement on the Supplemental Environmental Impact FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John National Register of Historic Places. Statement for the Winter Use Plans for Sacklin, Yellowstone National Park, PO Dream Lake Dam is an earthfill Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Box 168, Yellowstone, WY 82190, (307) embankment that forms a lake with a Parks and the John D. Rockefeller, Jr., 344–2020, [email protected]. surface area of approximately 2 acres, Memorial Parkway SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of containing approximately 11 acre-feet of the Record of Decision may be obtained water. The dam was examined by the AGENCY: National Park Service, from the contact listed above or online Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) on July Department of the Interior. 21, 1999 and found to have numerous SUMMARY: Pursuant to § 102(2)(C) of the at nps.gov/grte/winteruse/ winteruse.htm. deficiencies including sloughing, National Environmental Policy Act of sinkholes, settlements, and seepage. The 1969, Pub. L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 852, 853, Dated: March 25, 2003. BOR states in its November 6, 2000 codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. Karen Wade, Condition Survey Report that ‘‘the 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service Director, Intermountain Region, National seepage and sinkholes could endanger announces the availability of the Record Park Service. the stability of the dam, and should be of Decision for the Winter Use Plans for [FR Doc. 03–8191 Filed 4–3–03; 8:45 am] investigated and necessary corrective Yellowstone and Grand Teton National BILLING CODE 4310–70–P action should be performed * * *’’ The Parks and the John D. Rockefeller, Jr., BOR, in its Downstream Hazard Memorial Parkway; Wyoming, Montana, Classification stated that ‘‘without and Idaho. On March 24, 2003, the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR maintenance the failure of the dam in Director, Intermountain Region National Park Service the next few years is likely.’’ The BOR approved the Record of Decision for the went on the make a recommendation project with the decision effective at 12 Dream Lake Dam Management Plan; that one of two alternatives be noon m.s.t. on March 25, 2003. Lassen Volcanic National Park, Plumas implemented. Those alternatives Beginning in the winter of 2003–2004, County, California; Notice of Intent to included: (1) repairing the dam and/or the National Park Service will Prepare an Environmental Impact lowering and widening the spillway or implement this Decision although Statement (2) in a planned and controlled manner, certain provisions will not apply until breach the dam so that no water is implementing regulations are SUMMARY: Pursuant to § 102(2)(c) of the stored in the lake and the area reverts promulgated or until the winter of National Environmental Policy Act of back to pre-lake conditions. 2004–2005. The following course of 1969 (Pub. L. 91–190) and Council on Lassen Volcanic National Park will be action will occur under alternative 4, Environmental Quality regulations (40 preparing a draft EIS because of the the preferred alternative, as modified in CFR 1502.9(c)), the National Park conflict between natural and cultural the ROD: the use of snowmobiles in the Service intends to prepare an resource management issues in parks and the parkway will be Environmental Impact Statement for a determining the future of Dream Lake permitted, provided all machines meet Management Plan for the Dream Lake Dam. The park currently does not have best available technology (BAT) Dam in the Warner Valley area of Lassen a preferred alternative. The park is standards for sound and air emissions. Volcanic National Park. Notice is hereby looking for public input as to what All snowmobile users in Yellowstone given that a public scoping process has alternatives, in addition to those will be required to be to be been initiated with the purpose of recommended by the BOR, should be accompanied by NPS permitted guides. eliciting public comment regarding examined. In order to move forward Monitoring and adaptive management current issues and concerns, a suitable with a decision regarding the future strategies will allow for the adjustment range of alternatives, the nature and management of Dream Lake Dam, a plan of oversnow vehicle numbers should extent of potential environmental must first be developed and that plan monitoring and carrying capacity impacts, appropriate mitigating will be fully scoped for public input and studies indicate that standards are not measures, and other matters that should comment and it will contain a full being met. be addressed in the forthcoming draft environmental impact analysis for all of This specific course of action was not Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). the viable alternatives. included as an alternative in the Draft Background: Dream Lake Dam was As a key step in the overall Supplemental Environmental Impact built by Alex Sifford in 1932, prior to conservation planning and VerDate Jan<31>2003 14:30 Apr 03, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM 04APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 65 / Friday, April 4, 2003 / Notices 16549 environmental impact analysis process, become part of the public record. If determinations within this notice are the NPS is seeking public comments individuals who submit comments the sole responsibility of the museum, and relevant information to guide the request that their name and/or address institution, or Federal agency that has preparation of the Draft EIS. The be withheld from public disclosure, the control of these cultural items. The objectives of this public scoping effort request will be honored to the extent National Park Service is not responsible are to: allowable by law. Such requests must be for the determinations within this Inform all interested parties of the scope stated prominently in the beginning of notice. of the problem and the need to find the comments. There also may be The cultural item is a wampum belt, a solution; circumstances wherein the NPS will which is composed of purple beads with Identify a preliminary range of withhold a respondent’s identity as white beads forming the design of four management alternatives that may allowable by law. As always, the NPS pairs of diamonds. It is interwoven with include those posted by the BOR; will make available to public inspection buckskin and has fringe at the ends. The 1 Identify substantive environmental and all submission from organizations or wampum belt measures 3 feet 8 ⁄8 cultural issues which warrant detailed businesses and from persons identifying inches long without the fringe. The Field Museum of Natural History environmental impact analysis, and themselves as representatives or purchased the wampum belt in 1900 identify any issues or topics which officials of organizations and from Henry Hysen of Wisconsin. The may not require analysis; businesses. Anonymous comments may Field Museum of Natural History Identify potential environmental and not be considered. assessioned the wampum belt into its cultural consequences and suitable Decision Process: Availability of the collection the same year (catalog mitigation strategies. Draft EIS for review and comment will number 68567). Museum records Comment Process: The public will be be announced by formal Notice in the Federal Register, through local and indicate that Mr. Hysen purchased the invited to participate from the outset of wampum belt ‘‘from the owner who the scoping process through completion regional news media, the Park’s Webpage (listed above), and direct lived on the Stock Ridge Reservation, of the draft and final EIS. The initial one of the Brotherton Indians whose scoping period has already begun and mailing. At this time, the Draft EIS is anticipated to be available for public family had held the belt since it was public meetings have been held in order sent to them by Chief Black Hawk as a to: (1) Present information developed to review and comment in the Fall of 2003. Comments on the Draft EIS will be fully message to the tribes of the Michigan date, (2) answer questions about the and Wisconsin Indians assembled at planning process, and (3) solicit and considered as an aid in preparing a Final EIS as appropriate.
Recommended publications
  • Drakesbad Guest Ranch Plumas CA Property Name County State
    NFS Form 10-900a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section Page SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 03001062 Date Listed: 10/22/2003 Drakesbad Guest Ranch Plumas CA Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. / Signatur the Keeper Date of Action Amended Items in Nomination: Functions: The Historic Functions should be amended to include the following categories: Domestic/Hotel; Domestic/Camp; Recreation/Outdoor Recreation; Agriculture/Agricultural Fields; and Landscape/Natural feature. These revisions were confirmed with the NFS FPO office. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NPS Form 1 0-900 OMB No. 1 024-001 8 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior , National Park Service \(} v> NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Drakesbad Guest Ranch other name/site number: Drake's Baths; Drakesbad Resort; Hot Springs Valley 2. Location street & number: N/A not for publication: n/a vicinity: Head of Warner Creek Valley, Lassen Volcanic National Park city /town: Chester state: California code: CA county: Plumas code: 063 zip code: 96020 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professionjiiemiirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study
    14 Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study The Visitor Services Project 14 OMB Approval 1024-0224 Expiration Date: 02/29/2000 United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Lassen Volcanic National Park P.O. Box 100 Mineral, CA 96020 Dear Visitor: Thank you for participating in this important study. Our goal is to learn about the expectations, opinions, and interests of visitors to Lassen Volcanic National Park. This will assist us in our efforts to better manage this site and to serve you, the visitor. This questionnaire is only being given to a select number of visitors, so your participation is very important! It should only take a few minutes during or after your visit. When your visit is over, please complete the questionnaire. Seal it with the sticker provided on the last page and drop it in any U.S. mailbox. If you have any questions, please contact Margaret Littlejohn, VSP Coordinator, Cooperative Park Studies Unit, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133. We appreciate your help. Sincerely, /s/ Marilyn H. Parris Superintendent 14 DIRECTIONS One adult in your group should complete the questionnaire. It should only take a few minutes. When you have completed the questionnaire, please seal it with the sticker provided and drop it in any U.S. mailbox. We appreciate your help. PRIVACY ACT and PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT statement: 16 U.S.C. 1a-7 authorizes collection of this information. This information will be used by park managers to better serve the public. Response to this request is voluntary.
    [Show full text]
  • Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Social Science Program Visitor Services Project Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study [Insert image here] OMB Control Number:1024-0224 Current Expiration Date: 8/31/2014 2 Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Lassen Volcanic National Park P.O. Box 100 Mineral, CA 96063 IN REPLY REFER TO: January/June 2012 Dear Visitor: Thank you for participating in this study. Our goal is to learn about the expectations, opinions, and interests of visitors to Lassen Volcanic National Park. This information will assist us in our efforts to better manage this park and to serve you. This questionnaire is only being given to a select number of visitors, so your participation is very important! It should only take about 20 minutes to complete. Please complete this questionnaire. Seal it in and return it to us in the postage paid envelope provided. If you have any questions, please contact Margaret Littlejohn, NPS VSP Director, Park Studies Unit, College of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 441139, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1139, phone: 208-885-7863, email: [email protected]. We appreciate your help. Sincerely, Darlene M. Koontz Superintendent Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study 3 DIRECTIONS At the end of your visit: 1. Please have the selected individual (at least 16 years old) complete this questionnaire. 2. Answer the questions carefully since each question is different. 3. For questions that use circles (O), please mark your answer by filling in the circle with black or blue ink.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER of HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section P
    NFS Form 10-900a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section Page SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 03001062 Date Listed: 10/22/2003 Drakesbad Guest Ranch Plumas CA Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. / Signatur the Keeper Date of Action Amended Items in Nomination: Functions: The Historic Functions should be amended to include the following categories: Domestic/Hotel; Domestic/Camp; Recreation/Outdoor Recreation; Agriculture/Agricultural Fields; and Landscape/Natural feature. These revisions were confirmed with the NFS FPO office. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NPS Form 1 0-900 OMB No. 1 024-001 8 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior , National Park Service \(} v> NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Drakesbad Guest Ranch other name/site number: Drake's Baths; Drakesbad Resort; Hot Springs Valley 2. Location street & number: N/A not for publication: n/a vicinity: Head of Warner Creek Valley, Lassen Volcanic National Park city /town: Chester state: California code: CA county: Plumas code: 063 zip code: 96020 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professionjiiemiirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources
    4. Environmental Analysis 4.12 Cultural Resources 4.12 Cultural Resources Introduction This section of the DEIR addresses potential impacts to a variety of cultural resources (i.e., paleontological, archaeological, and historic) within the County. The regulatory setting provides a description of applicable federal, State, and local regulatory policies. The environmental setting provides a summary of known resources in the County. A description of the potential impacts of the proposed project is also provided and includes the identification of feasible mitigation (where applicable) to avoid or lessen the impacts. Summary of NOP Comments NOP comment letters from the United States Department of Agriculture and the Native American Heritage Commission were received, and addressed in this section, as appropriate. Summary of Impact Conclusions A summary of the cultural resource impacts described in this section are provided below in Table 4.12-1. TABLE 4.12-1 SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCE IMPACTS Impact Number Impact Topic Impact Conclusion Impact After Mitigation Impact 4.12-1 Historical Resources Potentially Significant Significant and Unavoidable Impact 4.12-2 Archaeological Resources Less Than Significant Less Than Significant Impact 4.12-3 Paleontological Resources Less Than Significant Less Than Significant Impact 4.12-4 Burial Sites Less Than Significant Less Than Significant Regulatory Setting Federal Regulations National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Most applicable Federal regulations concerning historic resources have been established
    [Show full text]
  • Lassen Volcanic National Park in 1916
    ® LASSEN VOLCANIC NATIONAL PARK NATIONAL PARK VOLCANIC LASSEN A R esource Assessment November 2009 ® Center for State of the Parks ® More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as the CONTENTS world’s first national park. That single act was the beginning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, historical, and cultural heritage. Today, Americans are learning that national park designation REPORT SUMMARY 1 alone cannot provide full resource protection. Many parks are LASSEN VOLCANIC NATIONAL compromised by development of adjacent lands, air and water pollu- tion, invasive plants and animals, and rapid increases in motorized PARK AT A GLANCE 2 recreation. Park officials often lack adequate information on the RATINGS 4 status of and trends in conditions of critical resources. The National Parks Conservation Association initiated the State of PARK STATISTICS 5 the Parks program in 2000 to assess the condition of natural and cultural resources in the parks, and determine how well equipped the KEY FINDINGS 6 National Park Service is to protect the parks—its stewardship capac- RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ity. The goal is to provide information that will help policymakers, the public, and the National Park Service improve conditions in HIGHLIGHTS 8 national parks, celebrate successes as models for other parks, and PARK MAP 10 ensure a lasting legacy for future generations. For more information about the methodology and research used THE LASSEN VOLCANIC in preparing this report and to learn more about the Center for State NATIONAL PARK ASSESSMENT 18 of the Parks, visit www.npca.org/stateoftheparks or contact: NPCA, Center for State of the Parks, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Plumas Pines Bar & Grill • Live Music
    What happens here gets all over town. www.grizzlygrill.com Full Bar • Fine Wines • Banquet APPETIZERS, SOUPS & SALADS Porcini Mushroom & Truffle Raviolis Served with a mushroom beurre blanc. House Made Soup ENTREES Mixed Green Salad Served with Soup or Salad • Upgrade to Caesar or Grizzly Salad Available Also available with chicken or salmon. Chicken Gorgonzola Sautéed chicken, mushrooms, artichoke hearts Grizzly Grill Salad Mixed greens served with honey roasted and gorgonzola cheese tossed in a sun-dried tomato pesto sauce. walnuts, crumbled bleu cheese and tossed with country vinaigrette. Also available with chicken or salmon. Chicken Parmesan Two breaded chicken cutlets topped with our homemade marinara sauce, mozzarella and parmesan cheese, served Classic Caesar Salad with pasta. Also available with chicken or salmon. Grilled Filet of Salmon on a bed of sautéed spinach with a side of Bruschetta French bread croutons smothered with diced tomato, mushroom parmesan fresh herb risotto. garlic, fresh basil, Italian parsley, kalamata olives, mozzarella & parmesan cheese with extra virgin olive oil. Shrimp Scampi with sautéed mushrooms, garlic and fresh herbs in a lemon cream sauce, served on a bed of rice. Deep-Fried Calamari Hot and crispy morsels served with cocktail and remoulade sauce. Canadian Lobster Tail Cold water lobster tail, sweet and delicious, Fresh Green-Lipped Mussells Steamed in white wine with garlic served with melted butter. and fresh herbs. Jambalaya A spicy mix of peppers and onions sautéed with Artichoke and Spinach Dip Bubbly hot, served with French Andouille sausage, grilled chicken & prawns, served over rice. baguette crostinis. Barbecued Pork Ribs 1/2 rack of succulent pork ribs in our PASTAS homemade barbecue sauce.
    [Show full text]
  • 261.1 LAVO Rept Nrss
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study Summer 2012 Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/EQD/NRR—2013/739 ON THE COVER Left: Kayaking on Manzanita Lake – Photo by Park Volunteer, D. Schlom Right: Visitors at Upper Kings Creek Meadow – NPS Photo, K. Haner Lower: Ranger Hoban and Junior Rangers – NPS Photo Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study Summer 2012 Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/EQD/NRR—2013/739 Ally Begly, Yen Le, Steven J. Hollenhorst Visitor Services Project Park Studies Unit College of Natural Resources University of Idaho 875 Perimeter Drive MS 1139 Moscow, ID 83844-1139 November 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado Lassen Volcanic National Park – VSP Visitor Study 261.1 August 3–9, 2012 The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study Summer 1999
    Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study Summer 1999 Report 116 Visitor Services Project Cooperative Park Studies Unit Lassen Volcanic National Park Visitor Study Summer 1999 Jennifer Rogers Visitor Services Project Report 116 April 2000 Jennifer Rogers is a Survey Assistant with the Visitor Services Project (VSP) at the Cooperative Park Studies Unit, University of Idaho. The VSP would like to thank Rosie Pavlov, Mike Meehan, Leigh Blackburn, Margaret Littlejohn, Karen Haner, and the staff of Lassen Volcanic National Park for their assistance with this study. The VSP acknowledges the Public Opinion Lab of the Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University, for its technical assistance. Visitor Services Project Lassen Volcanic National Park Report Summary • This report describes the results of a visitor study at Lassen Volcanic National Park (NP) during August 15-21, 1999. A total of 600 questionnaires were distributed to visitors. Visitors returned 473 questionnaires for a 79% response rate. • This report profiles Lassen Volcanic NP visitors. A separate appendix contains visitors' comments about their visit. This report and the appendix include summaries of those comments. • Over two-thirds (70%) of the visitor groups were family groups. Forty-one percent of visitor groups were groups of two. Forty-one percent of visitors were between 36 and 55 years old. Twenty-four percent of visitors were under the age of 15. • Forty-nine percent of visitors were making their first visit to Lassen Volcanic NP. Most of the visitor groups (58%) spent less than a day at the park. Of those groups that spent less than a day at the park, 49% spent four hours or less.
    [Show full text]
  • Haleakala Mountains
    Park Guide Book - Introduction Welcome to the 3rd edition of Bink Ink’s National Park So in this “land of opportunity” how is it that these stunning Guide Book! The Binkele family has long been advocates of environments we call our National Parks managed to escape privatization? How is it that we the citizens of the USA came to own a stake in over 84 million acres of public land covering over our country’s National Parks.th From the very first experience I 400 park locations? had camping along the Merced River in Yosemite in the ‘50’s, to the recent visit of our 57 park - Voyageurs in Minnesota - our The story of our park system begins with the people who had family has held a deep appreciation and respect for those who the vision, the passion, and the dedication to contribute to the made and continue to make these visits possible. creation, protection and preservation of our country’s “best idea.” Famous people and many people unknown. Rich people, In 2013, an idea developed to blend our passion for the parks poor people and people in between. Politicians, businessmen, with our son Charlie’sTrekking artistic the creativity National and Parks™ board. game design naturalists, scientists and soldiers. We owe this debt of gratitude ability. Thus became the genesis for the tabletop board game to the many folks who generously contributed their time, energy we created called and resources to help set aside these treasured lands for the Park Guide Book world to experience. An important component of the original game was the 32 page educate - a collection of information about each of Yet the future of our parks rests in the hands of our children.
    [Show full text]
  • Lassen Volcanic National Park
    Lassen Volcanic National Park Edquist Davis Exhibits Edquist Davis Exhibits 2010–2019 Under contract with National Park Service Harpers Ferry EdquistCenter Davis ExhibitsInterpretive Planning Long-Range Interpretive Plan Edquist Davis Exhibits Edquist Davis Exhibits Edquist Davis Exhibits Executive Summary This is the first Long-Range Interpretive Plan developed for Lassen Volcanic National Park. This plan represents both a snapshot of Lassen’s interpretation and education program at this time and a roadmap for its development over the next ten years. Goals and recommended actions set forth by this plan are supported by foundational information—Park Purpose, Significances, and Interpretive Themes—established to guide the park in all of its interpretive efforts. This plan is intended to assist staff and stakeholders as they strive to create greater emotional and intellectual connections between visitors and this dynamic park. While this plan is extremely ambitious, the park has many assets and partners that will help to meet the goals and complete the actions that the plan sets forth. These are partnerships that have been nurtured over the years and have grown into strong relationships that support the park’s current—and future—interpretive endeavors. 3 Park Significance These statements reflect the most current understanding of the significant resources at Lassen Volcanic National Park. 1 Lassen Volcanic National Park showcases a dynamic geological landscape containing an intact, accessible network of hydrothermal features. Located in relatively close proximity, 60 extinct and active volcanoes represent all four types recognized by geologists—plug dome, shield, composite, and cinder cone. 2 Lassen Peak violently erupted in 1914 and 1915 and became quiet by 1921.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Guide for Lassen Volcanic National Park
    LASSEN VACATION HIKING GUIDE Brought to you by St. Bernard Lodge... St. Bernard Lodge is an historic and affordable B&B in an ideal location just south of Lassen Volcanic National Park and just west of Lake Almanor. Explore the beautiful surroundings and then relax in our comfortable rooms and enjoy our delicious food. Call us at 530-258-3382 with any questions, visit our webpage (StBernardLodge.com), or just stop by to say hello and look at our extensive assortment of regional maps, brochures, and guidebooks. ----------------------- This Lassen Vacation Hiking Guide shares the best hiking opportunities in and around Lassen Volcanic National Park. The Lassen region has everything you could possibly want for your vacation: high mountain lakes for fishing and boating, extensive road systems for both street riding and mountain biking, many opportunities for winter snowshoeing... But most visitors to Lassen country do a lot of hiking. Lassen Volcanic National Park is the prime destination: dozens of miles of trails wander through forest and meadow to waterfalls and alpine lakes, and some trails climb steeply to the highest points in the park, including Brokeoff Mountain and Lassen Peak. The region surrounding the park also contains many hiking trails, all very beautiful and all less crowded than the park trails. Hiking Safety 1. Know where you’re going. This means having a map, especially if your route involves multiple trail intersections. 2. Bring the right supplies: map ample food and water first-aid kit rain protection map headlamp or flashlight with extra bulbs and batteries extra clothes toilet paper sunscreen Always check the weather report before you go.
    [Show full text]