DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Resources Inventory Report, Lassen Volcanic National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Resources Inventory Report, Lassen Volcanic National Park National Park Service US Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Lassen Volcanic National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2014/755 ON THE COVER Bumpass Hell. Bumpass Hell is one of the primary hydrothermal areas within Lassen Volcanic National Park. At sunset (shown on cover) it appears golden, while during the day, the pools look aqua blue (fig. 15). National Park Service photograph, available at http://flic.kr/p/cePV8N (accessed 12 November 2013). THIS PAGE Lassen Peak. Lassen Peak is the southernmost active volcano in the Cascade Range. Before the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens in Washington, Lassen Peak was the most recent volcanic outburst in the contiguous 48 states. A series of eruptions occurred between 1914 and 1917, with the most powerful on 22 May 1915. Photography by Benjamin Franklin Loomis, available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/lassennps/8435233161/ (accessed 5 November 2013). Lassen Volcanic National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2014/755 National Park Service Geologic Resources Division PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 January 2014 US Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. Printed copies of this report are produced in a limited quantity and they are only available as long as the supply lasts. This report is available from the Geologic Resources Inventory website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/inventory/ gre_publications.cfm) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). To receive this report in a format optimized for screen readers, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: KellerLynn, K. 2014. Lassen Volcanic National Park: geologic resources inventory report. Natural resource report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2014/755. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 111/123450, January 2014 ii NPS Geologic Resources Division Contents List of Figures and Tables ............................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements and Credits ................................................................................. vii Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Geologic Features and Processes .................................................................................. 5 Volcanic Features ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Geothermal and Hydrothermal Systems...................................................................................................................... 11 Hydrothermal Features ............................................................................................................................................... 13 Glacial Features ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 Lakes ......................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Meadows .................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Streams and Waterfalls .............................................................................................................................................. 21 Geologic Issues ............................................................................................................ 23 Hydrothermal Hazards ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Volcano Hazards ........................................................................................................................................................ 25 Seismic Activity .......................................................................................................................................................... 27 Slope Movements ...................................................................................................................................................... 28 Geothermal Development .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Abandoned Mineral Lands ......................................................................................................................................... 30 Disturbed Lands Restoration ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Manzanita Lake Dam ................................................................................................................................................. 33 Geologic History .......................................................................................................... 35 Regional Volcanism .................................................................................................................................................... 35 Volcanic Centers ........................................................................................................................................................ 35 Glaciations ................................................................................................................................................................. 38 Recent Volcanic Activity ............................................................................................................................................. 39 Present-Day (Non-Volcanic) Geologic Activity ............................................................................................................. 42 Geologic Map Data ...................................................................................................... 43 Geologic Maps .......................................................................................................................................................... 43 Source Maps .............................................................................................................................................................. 43 Geologic GIS Data ..................................................................................................................................................... 43 Map Unit Properties Table .......................................................................................................................................... 44 Geologic Map Graphic ............................................................................................................................................... 44 Use Constraints .......................................................................................................................................................... 44 Glossary ........................................................................................................................ 47 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................ 51 Additional References ................................................................................................. 57 Appendix A: GRI Participants ...................................................................................... 59 Appendix B: Geologic Resource Laws, Regulations, and Policies ............................. 61 Map 1: Simplified Geologic Map...................................................................... in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologic Storage Formation Classification: Understanding Its Importance and Impacts on CCS Opportunities in the United States
    BEST PRACTICES for: Geologic Storage Formation Classification: Understanding Its Importance and Impacts on CCS Opportunities in the United States First Edition Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed therein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Cover Photos—Credits for images shown on the cover are noted with the corresponding figures within this document. Geologic Storage Formation Classification: Understanding Its Importance and Impacts on CCS Opportunities in the United States September 2010 National Energy Technology Laboratory www.netl.doe.gov DOE/NETL-2010/1420 Table of Contents Table of Contents 5 Table of Contents Executive Summary ____________________________________________________________________________ 10 1.0 Introduction and Background
    [Show full text]
  • NOMINATION FORM for NPS USE ONLY for FEDERAL PROPERTIES ENTRY DATE (Type All Entries - Complete Applicable Sections) Rti^T Fl 1SP6
    STATE: .Form Igd?6 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Uct. IV/^J NATIONAL PARK SERVICE California COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Shasta and Lassen INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES ENTRY DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) rti^T fl 1SP6 COMMON: Nobles' Emigrant Trail HS-1 AND/OR HISTORIC: Nobles' Trail (Fort Kearney, South Pass and Honey Lake Wagon Road) STREET AND NUMBER: M --"'' ^ * -X'"' '' J-- - ;/* ( ,: - "; ^ ;." ; r ^-v, % /'• - O1- - >,- ,•<•-,- , =••'"' CITY OR TOWN: / '-' j- ,. " ,-, ,, , CONG RESSIONAL DISTRICT: Lassen Volcanic National Park S econd STATE: CODE COUN TY: CODE California 06 Shaj3ta and Lassen 089/035 :. : ; STATUS ACCESSIBLE (Check?ATE,G SOne)R \ OWNERSHIP SIAIU3 T0 THE p UBL|c gf] District Q Building [ig Public Public Acquisition: [ | Occupied Yes: : : -Z Q Site | | Structure | | Private Q In Process PT"1 Unoccupied | | Restricted 0 [~~| Object Qj Both f~| Being Consider)sd Q Preservation work [X] Unrestricted in progress [~~] No u PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) | | Agricultural jj£] Government [X] Park | | Transportation | | Comments h- I | Commercial Q2 Industrial [~~| Private Residence | | Other (SpeciM »/> Q Educational Q Military [~1 Religious ;; /. z [^Entertainment Q Museum f"| Scientific UJ STATE: »/> National Park Service REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (If applicable) SIr REET AND NUMBER: Western Region l^50 Golden Gate Avenue Cl TY OR TOWN: SIPATE: CODE San Francisco California Ub V BliBsi^iiiiBHIiiMMIiBlilBl^isMiM^Ml Illlllillliil^^ COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: COUNTY: STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: SIPATE: CODE Lassen Volcanic National Park California Ob toM^ TITLE OF SURVEY: The National Survey of Historic '&&& s^n^lt^J^aglix "Overland Migrations West of the Mississippi" TI AsX -X^ ENT^Y*"NUMBER o DATE OF SURVEY: 1959 [X] Federal Q State / ^yl County | _ | LocoilP' ^k X3 Z DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: t) •j? in C OAHP, WASO c/> rj V?\ m STREET AND NUMBER: 'l - i H~*~! ^|T"-, r £;.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Guiding Geology Tour of Stanley Park
    Page 1 of 30 Self-guiding geology tour of Stanley Park Points of geological interest along the sea-wall between Ferguson Point & Prospect Point, Stanley Park, a distance of approximately 2km. (Terms in bold are defined in the glossary) David L. Cook P.Eng; FGAC. Introduction:- Geomorphologically Stanley Park is a type of hill called a cuesta (Figure 1), one of many in the Fraser Valley which would have formed islands when the sea level was higher e.g. 7000 years ago. The surfaces of the cuestas in the Fraser valley slope up to the north 10° to 15° but approximately 40 Mya (which is the convention for “million years ago” not to be confused with Ma which is the convention for “million years”) were part of a flat, eroded peneplain now raised on its north side because of uplift of the Coast Range due to plate tectonics (Eisbacher 1977) (Figure 2). Cuestas form because they have some feature which resists erosion such as a bastion of resistant rock (e.g. volcanic rock in the case of Stanley Park, Sentinel Hill, Little Mountain at Queen Elizabeth Park, Silverdale Hill and Grant Hill or a bed of conglomerate such as Burnaby Mountain). Figure 1: Stanley Park showing its cuesta form with Burnaby Mountain, also a cuesta, in the background. Page 2 of 30 Figure 2: About 40 million years ago the Coast Mountains began to rise from a flat plain (peneplain). The peneplain is now elevated, although somewhat eroded, to about 900 metres above sea level. The average annual rate of uplift over the 40 million years has therefore been approximately 0.02 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Adventure Hat Creek Ranger District Lassen National Forest
    Area Adventure Hat Creek Ranger District Lassen National Forest Welcome The following list of recreation activities are avail- able in the Hat Creek Recreation Area. For more detailed information please stop by the Old Station Visitor Information Center, open April - December, or our District Office located in Fall River Mills. Give Hat Creek Rim Overlook - Nearly 1 million years us a call year-around Mon.- Fri. at (530) 336-5521. ago, active faulting gradually dropped a block of Enjoy your visit to this very interesting country. the Earth’s crust (now Hat Creek Valley) 1,000 feet below the top of the Hat Creek Rim, leaving behind Subway Cave - See an underground cave formed this large fault scarp. This fault system is still “alive by flowing lava. Located just off Highway 89, 1/4 and cracking”. mile north of Old Station junction with Highway 44. The lava tube tour is self guided and the walk is A heritage of the Hat Creek area’s past, it offers mag- 1/3 mile long. Bring a lantern or strong flashlight nificent views of Hat Creek Valley, Lassen Peak, as the cave is not lighted. Sturdy Shoes and a light Burney Mountain, and, further away, Mt. Shasta. jacket are advisable. Subway Cave is closed during the winter months. Fault Hat Creek Rim Fault Scarp Vertical movement Hat Creek V Cross Section of a Lava Tube along this fault system alley dropped this block of earth into its present position Spattercone Trail - Walk a nature trail where volca- nic spattercones and other interesting geologic fea- tures may be seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Source to Surface Model of Monogenetic Volcanism: a Critical Review
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Source to surface model of monogenetic volcanism: a critical review I. E. M. SMITH1 &K.NE´ METH2* 1School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2Volcanic Risk Solutions, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Small-scale volcanic systems are the most widespread type of volcanism on Earth and occur in all of the main tectonic settings. Most commonly, these systems erupt basaltic magmas within a wide compositional range from strongly silica undersaturated to saturated and oversatu- rated; less commonly, the spectrum includes more siliceous compositions. Small-scale volcanic systems are commonly monogenetic in the sense that they are represented at the Earth’s surface by fields of small volcanoes, each the product of a temporally restricted eruption of a composition- ally distinct batch of magma, and this is in contrast to polygenetic systems characterized by rela- tively large edifices built by multiple eruptions over longer periods of time involving magmas with diverse origins. Eruption styles of small-scale volcanoes range from pyroclastic to effusive, and are strongly controlled by the relative influence of the characteristics of the magmatic system and the surface environment. Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license. Small-scale basaltic magmatic systems characteris- hazards associated with eruptions, and this is tically occur at the Earth’s surface as fields of small particularly true where volcanic fields are in close monogenetic volcanoes. These volcanoes are the proximity to population centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Gems of California's State Parks
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA – EDMUND G. BROWN JR., GOVERNOR NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY – JOHN LAIRD, SECRETARY CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION – LISA MANGAT, DIRECTOR JOHN D. PARRISH, Ph.D., STATE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION – DAVID BUNN, DIRECTOR PLATE 1 The rugged cliffs of Del Norte Coast Redwoods State Park are composed of some of California’s Bio-regions the most tortured, twisted, and mobile rocks of the North American continent. The California’s Geomorphic Provinces rocks are mostly buried beneath soils and covered by vigorous redwood forests, which thrive in a climate famous for summer fog and powerful winter storms. The rocks only reveal themselves in steep stream banks, along road and trail cut banks, along the precipitous coastal cliffs and offshore in the form of towering rock monuments or sea stacks. (Photograph by CalTrans staff.) Few of California’s State parks display impressive monoliths adorned like a Patrick’s Point State Park displays a snapshot of geologic processes that have castle with towering spires and few permit rock climbing. Castle Crags State shaped the face of western North America, and that continue today. The rocks Park is an exception. The scenic beauty is best enjoyed from a distant exposed in the seacliffs and offshore represent dynamic interplay between the vantage point where one can see the range of surrounding landforms. The The Klamath Mountains consist of several rugged ranges and deep canyons. Klamath/North Coast Bioregion San Joaquin Valley Colorado Desert subducting oceanic tectonic plate (Gorda Plate) and the continental North American monolith and its surroundings are a microcosm of the Klamath Mountains The mountains reach elevations of 6,000 to 8,000 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 65/Friday, April 4, 2003/Notices
    16548 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 65 / Friday, April 4, 2003 / Notices The segregative effect associated with Statement, but was included and the National Park Service (NPS) the application terminated March 19, analyzed, along with 4 additional acquiring the land on which the lake 2000, in accordance with the notice alternatives, in the Final Supplemental sits. The lake was built by Sifford to published as FR Doc. 00–3267 in the Environmental Impact Statement. The provide scenic benefits and recreational Federal Register (65 FR 7057–8) dated full range of foreseeable environmental opportunities to guests at the nearby February 11, 2000. consequences was assessed, and Drakesbad Guest Ranch, which Sifford Dated: January 21, 2003. appropriate mitigating measures were owned. Drakesbad Guest Ranch is over Howard A. Lemm, identified. 100 years old and is still in operation to The Record of Decision includes a this day. It is owned by the National Acting Deputy State Director, Division of statement of the decision made, Resources. Park Service and is located within the synopses of other alternatives boundaries of Lassen Volcanic National [FR Doc. 03–8170 Filed 4–3–03; 8:45 am] considered, the basis for the decision, a Park. Drakesbad is operated by the BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P description of the environmentally Park’s concessioner, California Guest preferable alternative, a finding Services. Drakesbad, with nearby Dream DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR regarding impairment of park resources Lake, is a popular destination and has and values, a listing of measures to been visited by many generations of National Park Service minimize environmental harm, an families.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique Volcanic Field in Tharsis, Mars: Monogenetic Cinder Cones and Lava Flows As Evidence for Hawaiian Eruptions
    42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2011) 1379.pdf A UNIQUE VOLCANIC FIELD IN THARSIS, MARS: MONOGENETIC CINDER CONES AND LAVA FLOWS AS EVIDENCE FOR HAWAIIAN ERUPTIONS. P. Brož1 and E. Hauber2, 1Institute of Geophysics ASCR, v.v.i., Prague, Czech Republic, [email protected], 2Institut für Planetenforschung, DLR, Berlin, Germany, [email protected]. Introduction: Most volcanoes on Mars that have Data: We use images from several cameras, i.e. been studied so far seem to be basaltic shield volca- Context Camera (CTX), High Resolution Stereo Cam- noes, which can be very large with diameters of hun- era (HRSC), and High Resolution Imaging Science dreds of kilometers [e.g., 1] or much smaller with di- Experiment (HiRISE) for morphological analyses. ameters of several kilometers only [2]. Few Viking Topographic information (e.g., heights and slope an- Orbiter-based studies reported the possible existence gles) were determined from single shots of the Mars of cinder cones [3,4] or stratovolcanoes [5-7], and only Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) in a GIS environ- the advent of higher-resolution data led to the tentative ment, and from stereo images (HRSC, CTX) and de- interpretation of previously unknown edifices as cinder rived gridded digital elevation models (DEM). cones [8] or rootless cones [9]. The identification of Morphometry: For comparison between the cinder cones can constrain the nature of eruption proc- cones and terrestrial morphological analogues (i.e. esses and, indirectly, our understanding of the nature cinder cones [10]) we determined some basic mor- of parent magmas (e.g., volatile content). Here we re- phometric properties and their ratios (e.g., crater di- port on our observation of a unique cluster of possible ameter [WCR] vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Legacy
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacifi c Southwest Region VOLCANIC LEGACY March 2012 SCENIC BYWAY ALL AMERICAN ROAD Interpretive Plan For portions through Lassen National Forest, Lassen Volcanic National Park, Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Tule Lake, Lava Beds National Monument and World War II Valor in the Pacific National Monument 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................4 Background Information ........................................................................................................................4 Management Opportunities ....................................................................................................................5 Planning Assumptions .............................................................................................................................6 BYWAY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................7 Management Goals ..................................................................................................................................7 Management Objectives ..........................................................................................................................7 Visitor Experience Goals ........................................................................................................................7 Visitor
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Landforms: the Landform Which Is Formed from the Material Thrown out to the Surface During Volcanic Activity Is Called Extrusive Landform
    Download Testbook App Volcanic Geography NCERT Notes Landforms For UPSC ABOUT VOLCANIC LANDFORM: Volcanic landform is categorised into two types they are:extrusive and intrusive landforms. This division is done based on whether magma cools within the crust or above the crust. By the cooling process of magma different types of rock are formed. Like: Plutonic rock, it is a rock which is magma within the crust whereas Igneous rock is formed by the cooling of lava above the surface. Along with that “igneous rock” term is also used to refer to all rocks of volcanic origin. Extrusive Volcanic Landforms: The landform which is formed from the material thrown out to the surface during volcanic activity is called extrusive landform. The materials which are thrown out during volcanic activity are: lava flows, pyroclastic debris, volcanic bombs, ash, dust and gases such as nitrogen compounds, sulphur compounds and minor amounts of chlorine, hydrogen and argon. Conical Vent and Fissure Vent: Conical Vent: It is a narrow cylindrical vent through which magma flows out violently. Such vents are commonly seen in andesitic volcanism. Fissure vent: Such vent is a narrow, linear through which lava erupts with any kind of explosive events. Such vents are usually seen in basaltic volcanism. Mid-Ocean Ridges: The volcanoes which are found in oceanic areas are called mid-ocean ridges. In them there is a system of mid-ocean ridges stretching for over 70000 km all through the ocean basins. And the central part of such a ridge usually gets frequent eruptions. Composite Type Volcanic Landforms: Such volcanic landforms are also called stratovolcanoes.
    [Show full text]
  • August 24, 2020—5:00 P.M
    BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 24, 2020—5:00 P.M. Meeting via ZOOM Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89991617032?pwd=SGYzS3JYcG9mNS93ZjhqRkxSR2o0Zz09 Meeting ID: 899 9161 7032 Passcode: 300907 One tap mobile +16699006833,,89991617032# US (San Jose) +12532158782,,89991617032# US (Tacoma) Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Meeting ID: 899 9161 7032 ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Butte County Public Works Facility, Via ZOOM 2.00 Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 2.01 Roll Call – Members: Nick Repanich, Thad Walker, Teri Faulkner, Dan Taverner, Peggy Moak (Puterbaugh absent) Alternates: Vance Severin, Carolyn Denero, Bob Gage, Holly Jorgensen (voting Alt), Frank Stewart Invited Guests: Dan Efseaff,(Director, Paradise Recreation and Park District); Dave Steindorf (American Whitewater); Jim Houtman (Butte County Fire Safe Council); Taylor Nilsson (Butte County Fire Safe Council), Deb Bumpus (Forest Supervisor, Lassen National Forest); Russell Nickerson,(District Ranger, Almanor Ranger District, Lassen National Forest); Chris Carlton (Supervisor, Plumas National Forest); David Brillenz (District Ranger, Feather River Ranger District (FRRD), Plumas National Forest); Clay Davis (NEPA Planner, FRRD); Brett Sanders (Congressman LaMalfa’s Representative); Dennis Schmidt (Director of Public Works); Paula Daneluk (Director of Development Services) 2.02 Self-introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests, and Public – 5 Min. 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and approve minutes of 7-27-20 – 5 Min. 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Paradise Recreation & Park District Magalia and Paradise Lake Loop Trails Project – Dan Efseaff, Director- 20 Min 4.02 Coordinating Committee Meeting results – Poe Relicensing Recreational Trail Letter from PG&E, Dave Steindorf of American Whitewater to share history and current situation:.
    [Show full text]